Next Article in Journal
Highly Immunogenic Nanoparticles Based on a Fusion Protein Comprising the M2e of Influenza A Virus and a Lipopeptide
Previous Article in Journal
Citrus tristeza virus P33 Protein Is Required for Efficient Transmission by the Aphid Aphis (Toxoptera) citricidus (Kirkaldy)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Viruses
Volume 12
Issue 10
10.3390/v12101132
viruses-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Molecular Insights into Bacteriophage Evolution toward Its Host

by
Marina de Leeuw
1,2,†,
Maayan Baron
1,†,
Oshrit Ben David
1 and
Ariel Kushmaro
1,3,*
1
Avram and Stella Goldstein-Goren Department of Biotechnology Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, P.O. Box 653, Be’er Sheva 8410501, Israel
2
The Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
3
The Ilse Katz Center for Meso and Nanoscale Science and Technology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Be’er Sheva 8410501, Israel
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Viruses 2020, 12(10), 1132; https://doi.org/10.3390/v12101132
Submission received: 31 July 2020 / Revised: 24 September 2020 / Accepted: 29 September 2020 / Published: 6 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Bacterial Viruses)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Bacteriophages (phages), viruses that infect bacteria, are considered to be highly host-specific. To add to the knowledge about the evolution and development of bacteriophage speciation toward its host, we conducted a 21-day experiment with the broad host-range bacteriophage Aquamicrobium phage P14. We incubated the phage, which was previously isolated and enriched with the Alphaproteobacteria Aquamicrobium H14, with the Betaproteobacteria Alcaligenaceae H5. During the experiment, we observed an increase in the phage’s predation efficacy towards Alcaligenaceae H5. Furthermore, genome analysis and the comparison of the bacteriophage’s whole genome indicated that rather than being scattered evenly along the genome, mutations occur in specific regions. In total, 67% of the mutations with a frequency higher than 30% were located in genes that encode tail proteins, which are essential for host recognition and attachment. As control, we incubated the phage with the Alphaproteobacteria Aquamicrobium H8. In both experiments, most of the mutations appeared in the gene encoding the tail fiber protein. However, mutations in the gene encoding the tail tubular protein B were only observed when the phage was incubated with Alcaligenaceae H5. This highlights the phage’s tail as a key player in its adaptation to different hosts. We conclude that mutations in the phage’s genome were mainly located in tail-related regions. Further investigation is needed to fully characterize the adaptation mechanisms of the Aquamicrobium phage P14.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Bacteriophages, or phages, are viruses that infect bacteria [1]. Consequently, phages have a marked influence on microbial populations [2,3,4]. Several studies in recent years have investigated the effects of phages on their host populations in natural environments [5,6], in the food industry [7,8,9,10,11], in agriculture [12], for medical research [13] and in wastewater treatment processes [14,15,16,17,18]. The high level of interest in phages is due to the potential of phage research not only to answer basic evolutionary questions, but also to lead to practical applications, e.g., fighting pathogens [7,8,19] and improving industrial processes [1,3,20].
Phage–host interaction is exceptional compared to other predator–prey associations. Phages are considered highly specific to their hosts, and their replication depends on the host cell’s machinery [21]. The first stage in the phage’s replication cycle is its attachment to the bacterium’s cell surface, during which a receptor on the tail or capsid of the phage recognizes receptor molecules on the host cell’s surface [22]. The ability of a phage to recognize and attach to those receptors is one of the factors that influences its host range [23]. After phage attachment to the bacterial host, it injects its genetic material into the cell. The subsequent stages in phage replication depend on the specific infection pathway [24].
To resist phage predation, bacteria exploit defense mechanisms that interfere with the phage adsorption or replication steps of the infection process [25]. Concurrently, the phage evolves novel mechanisms to enter the host’s cell and reproduce [26,27,28]. Both bacteria and phage undergo genetic changes that are favored by increased fitness and selection. The selection pressure that acts on one of the players (bacteria or phage) triggers a corresponding selection pressure on the other [29].
Previous studies have shown that mutations in viral genomes may help shift the parasite’s host range [30]. Ferris et al. [31] showed that random mutations in the host attachment gene of the RNA virus, bacteriophage φ6, enabled the phage to infect an additional strain of Pseudomonas syringae. Similarly, substitutions in the major capsid gene of the bacteriophage phiX174 were responsible for the phage’s adaptation to Salmonella and its decreased ability to infect Escherichia coli [32]. These experiments clearly demonstrated the abilities of phages to adapt to new hosts that are members of the same family as their original host.
In this study, we examined the ability of Aquamicrobium phage P14—isolated previously from a full-scale membrane bioreactor used to treat chemical industry wastewater, and propagated using Aquamicrobium H14—to adapt to the bacterium Alcaligenaceae H5 (isolated from the same reactor). Changes in the efficacy of phage predation toward Alcaligenaceae H5 were measured during a 21-day experiment, in which Aquamicrobium H14 served as the reference host. In addition, we incubated the phage with Aquamicrobium H8 (related to Aquamicrobium H14 and isolated from the same reactor). Samples from both experiments at different time points were sequenced and changes in the phage genome were monitored. The results demonstrate that rather than being evenly distributed across the phage genome, the mutations tend to cluster in tail-related regions, thus leading to increased phage predation efficacy toward Alcaligenaceae H5.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. System Description

Both the phage and the bacteria samples were obtained previously from a full-scale membrane bioreactor used to treat chemical industry wastewater [15]. The phage, Aquamicrobium phage P14 (KX660669), is a broad host-range phage that was previously isolated using the bacteria Aquamicrobium H14 (GQ254284) as host. In contrast to most phages, Aquamicrobium phage P14 has the unusual ability to infect bacteria from different classes [33]. The phage is able to form plaques when plated with Alphaproteobacteria (Aquamicrobium H8 (GQ254278) and Aquamicrobium H14) and Betaproteobacteria (Alcaligenaceae H5 (GQ254275), Alcaligenaceae H13 (GQ254283) and Alcaligenaceae H17 (GQ254287)).
To examine the development of host specificity, we designed a phage-bacteria experiment. For this experiment we used Aquamicrobium phage P14 and two host bacteria: Alcaligenaceae H5 and, as the control for comparing the mutations in the genome, Aquamicrobium H8, which belongs to the same family as Aquamicrobium H14.

2.1.1. Preparation

Aquamicrobium phage P14 was incubated with Aquamicrobium H14 for two days at 30 °C and constant shaking using 10 mL Luria–Bertani (LB) broth. The mixture of Aquamicrobium phage P14 with Aquamicrobium H14 was then filtered through a 0.22 μm Durapore PVDF membrane (Durapore® PVDF membrane, Merck Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). In parallel, Alcaligenaceae H5 and Aquamicrobium H8 were incubated in LB broth for two days in separate test tubes (30 °C, constant shaking).

2.1.2. The Experiment

At the beginning of the experiment, 1 mL of each bacteria sample was added to 10 mL of fresh LB broth (bacteria concentration: 2.33 × 107 ± 0.39 × 107 CFU/mL for Alcaligenaceae H5 and 2.73 × 106 ± 1.63 × 106 CFU/mL for Aquamicrobium H8). Then, 100 μL of Aquamicrobium phage P14 (7.72 × 108 PFU/mL, counted with Aquamicrobium H14) was added to each test tube that contained the Alcaligenaceae H5 or Aquamicrobium H8 bacteria. See Figure 1 for a schematic presentation of the experimental setup.
The experiment was conducted once and continued for 21 days under batch conditions (30 °C, constant shaking), during which the medium was refreshed every 3–4 days by transferring 1 mL from each test tube to a new test tube containing 10 mL fresh medium. Approximately every six days, live counts (colony forming units, CFUs) were used to assess the bacterial concentrations, while plaque forming unit (PFU) assays were performed using the top agar procedure to enumerate the phages. Throughout the experiment, 16S rRNA gene sequencing was used to verify bacterial identity and to screen for contamination.

2.2. Sampling

Samples containing both bacteria and phage were taken every three to four days and stored at −80 °C in 20% glycerol for future analysis. Phage samples were obtained by centrifuging the biomass at 10,000× g for 5 min. The supernatant was filtered through a 0.22 μm Durapore PVDF membrane (Durapore® PVDF membrane, Merck Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) and kept frozen (−80 °C) until analysis (DNA extraction and sequencing).

2.3. Quantification of Bacteriophage and Bacteria

Viable bacterial counts were determined on days 0, 6, 13 and 20 by plating 20 μL of serial 10-fold diluted triplicate samples on LB agar plates. The plates were incubated at 30 °C for 48 h until the formation of colonies. Phages were quantified by counting PFUs on soft agar. Briefly, 100 μL quantities of serial 10-fold diluted phage samples were mixed with either Aquamicrobium H14 or Alcaligenaceae H5 in soft LB agar (0.7% agar in LB medium, 45 °C). The soft agar was then plated on warm LB agar plates (30 °C) and the plates were incubated for 48 h at 30 °C until plaques formed. Plaque counts and morphologies were documented.

2.4. DNA Extraction and Sequencing

Samples (1.5 mL) from the test tubes were filtered through a 0.22 μm syringe filter (Durapore® PVDF membrane, Merck Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) and then concentrated 10-fold using Amicon® Ultra-0.5 3K Centrifugal Filters (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). The DNA was extracted from the concentrated 0.15 mL samples using the UltraClean Microbial DNA Isolation Kit by MO BIO (Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol with two modifications: the first step of the DNA extraction, which concentrates bacterial cells by centrifugation, was omitted, and only 25 µL of elution solution was used. The purified DNA was sequenced on a MiSeq Illumina machine (San Diego, CA, USA) with 150 bp paired-end reads. The raw sequences used in this research are available in the NCBI’s Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under accessions SRX827032 and SRX7412192.

2.5. DNA Sequence Analysis, Bioinformatics and Comparative Analysis

Sequence analysis was performed using the CLC Genomics Workbench 12.0. The raw paired-end sequence reads were trimmed (ambiguous limit of 2, quality score limit of 0.05), and reads shorter than 15 nucleotides were discarded. To locate variants, reads from each sample were mapped to a reference genome previously assembled for Aquamicrobium phage P14 [33], GenBank database [34] accession KX660669. The mapping was performed using the default parameters (length fraction 0.5, and similarity fraction 0.8) and variants were detected using the quality variant detection function, in which only those variants with frequencies higher than 10% were annotated. Only SNPs with a forward/reverse balance greater than 0.05 and an average base quality of more than 20 were used, as was done previously [35]. The gene sequences with mutations were translated into protein sequences using the translate tool ExPASy (SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics) [36].

3. Results and Discussion

Aquamicrobium phage P14 is a phage belonging to the Autographiviridae family [33]. It has icosahedral symmetry, it measures approximately 50 nm in length, it has a short tail, and its genome is 40,551 bp long. The phage used in this study was previously isolated from an industrial wastewater treatment plant [15] and enriched using Aquamicrobium H14 as the host. In contrast to most phages, however, it can infect bacteria from different classes. We therefore decided to explore this ability more rigorously by incubating the Aquamicrobium phage P14 with Alcaligenaceae H5 (which belongs to a different class than Aquamicrobium H14) and, as a control for comparing the mutations in the genome, with Aquamicrobium H8 (which belongs to the same family as the bacteria that was used during the phage enrichment stage). Since the experiment was performed once, more biological replicates are needed in order to strengthen our conclusions.

3.1. Changes in Bacterial and Bacteriophage Concentrations over Time

During the experiment, CFUs and PFUs were used to assess the bacterial concentration and to enumerate the phages (Table 1). Interestingly, bacterial concentrations did not decrease significantly during the experiment. This indicates that the bacteria gained some resistance to the phages, probably as a result of coevolution occurring along the experiment [27,37]. Another possible explanation for the relatively stable bacterial concentrations could be pseudolysogeny [38,39,40]. However, no significant morphological changes were observed in the bacterial colonies.
Curiously, the phage population remained marginally stable during the first two weeks of incubation with Alcaligenaceae H5. While refreshing the medium every several days could lead to a decrease in the phage concentration, the concentration calculated using Alcaligenaceae H5 for the plaque assay remained stable until day 13, indicating that the phages were able to propagate. Only on day 20 did the phage concentration decline; possible explanations for this may include phage inability to infect the host, in combination with natural decay and the dilution caused by the refreshment of the medium.

3.2. Changes in Phage Efficacy

Phage predation efficacy toward Alcaligenaceae H5, defined by the ratio of the PFUs per ml obtained for the Alcaligenaceae H5 to the PFU measurement obtained with the original host Aquamicrobium H14, increased substantially on day 20 (Figure 2). The ability of a phage to increase its efficacy toward one of its hosts following incubation with it was demonstrated earlier for φX174 [32] and for bacteriophage T7 [41]. We did not determine whether the change in the infection ratio is due to an increase in phage predation efficacy toward Alcaligenaceae H5 or to a decrease in that efficacy toward Aquamicrobium H14. It should be noted, however, that even after 20 days, the phage PFU concentration enumerated by plating with Aquamicrobium H14 was higher than that found when the phage was plated with Alcaligenaceae H5.

3.3. Mapping Reads to the Genome of Aquamicrobium Phage P14

Reads from each sample were trimmed and then mapped to the reference genome of Aquamicrobium phage P14, which is 40,551 bp long. Most of the samples were successfully mapped. For the Aquamicrobium phage P14 that was incubated with Alcaligenaceae H5, 637,884 reads were mapped on day 3, 174,701 reads were mapped on day 9, 230,898 reads were mapped on day 15 and 164,871 reads were mapped on day 21. For the Aquamicrobium phage P14 that was incubated with Aquamicrobium H8, 89,965 reads were mapped on day 3, 155,520 reads were mapped on day 9, 201,079 reads were mapped on day 15, and 1,513,299 reads were mapped on day 21. Unfortunately, the sample at the beginning of the experiment contained a short DNA sequence which belongs to Aquamicrobium H14 (accession: MW015988). Therefore, only 1183 out of more than 3.5 million reads were successfully mapped (~0.03% of the reads) to the Aquamicrobium phage P14. Thus, we will focus mainly on mutations which occurred after day 3, mutations that became dominant along the experiment and mutations that were detected when the phage was incubated with one bacteria but not with the other.

3.4. Mutations in the Phage Genome

The distribution of variants along the genome of Aquamicrobium phage P14 during incubation with Alcaligenaceae H5 is given in Figure 3, in which the variance frequency threshold was 10% (i.e., a minimum of 10% of the reads mapped to a specific spot had a mutation at that spot). When using a 30% variance frequency threshold, a total of 18 mutations were detected along the phage genome during the experiment (Table 2). From among these mutations, one was only detected on day 3, two were only detected on day 9 and five were only detected on day 21. All other 10 mutations were present in at least two time points.

3.4.1. Mutation in the Gene Encoding Seryl-Threonyl Protein Kinase

One notable mutation was seen in the gene encoding seryl-threonyl protein kinase, in which two nucleotides were deleted at positions 4099 and 4100. These deletions interfered with the stop codon, and instead of a glutamic acid at the end of the protein’s sequence, 20 amino acids were added to the C-terminus: VTCSINVRAWSCFGCRTGRV. It is not clear, however, what influence, if any, this addition has. A few matches to the new C-terminus were found using blastp (protein to protein) [43]. None of them were significant, however, since the sequence is relatively short.
The mutation was observed when the Aquamicrobium phage P14 was incubated with Alcaligenaceae H5, on days 9, 15 and 21 (see Table 2). It was also observed when the phage was incubated with Aquamicrobium H8 (on days 3 and 9), but in this case, the frequency of the mutation was significantly lower, and on day 21 it was found in only 13.15% of the mapped reads (see Table S2). It is possible that this mutation occurred during the preparation of the experiment (from the beginning of the experiment, only four reads were mapped to this location, and one of them had the same mutation). Interestingly, the frequency of this mutation increased only during incubation with Alcaligenaceae H5, although this could be a coincidence and further investigation is needed.

3.4.2. Mutation in the Gene Encoding DNA Polymerase A

Two mutations were annotated in the gene encoding DNA polymerase. In both cases, a guanine was replaced by thymine (locations 11,077 and 11,086). As a result, glycine134 and glycine137, which have non-polar side chains, became valines, which have a hydrophobic side chain. Although such a switch may have marked effects on protein structure and function, we do not have enough data to support such a claim. Unfortunately, only two reads from the sample at the beginning of the experiment were mapped to this area, and both of them had thymine in locations 11,077 and 11,086. In addition, in both the experimental (incubation with Alcaligenaceae H5) and control (incubation with Aquamicrobium H8) samples, about two-thirds of the mapped reads had this mutation, and no significant increase or decrease was observed in the mutation’s frequency over the course of the experiment.
Notably, these two mutations tend to appear together. For example, in 87% of the reads in which thymine is in position 11,077, a thymine is also in location 11,086, and 92% of the reads with a thymine in location 11,086 (same sample) also have a thymine in location 11,077. We used Phyre2 to predict the 3D structure based on the known structures of DNA polymerase proteins [44]. As can be seen in Figure 4, the affected amino acids are glycine134 and glycine137, both of which are replaced by a valine. According to the 3D structure prediction, these amino acids are located in a segment of a loop in which the distance between the alpha carbons of the glycines is 7.3 Å.

3.4.3. Mutation in the Genes Encoding the Tail Tubular Proteins

One mutation in location 24,958 was marked in the gene encoding the tail tubular protein A. In this case, a cytosine was replaced by a thymine. This mutation caused the replacement of a proline21, an amino acid with a non-polar side chain, with a leucine, which has a hydrophobic side chain. Interestingly, the frequency of this mutation changed along the timeline of the experiment. When the Aquamicrobium phage P14 was incubated with Alcaligenaceae H5 it increased from 44.52% on day 3 to 59.76% on day 9, and 98.11% on day 15. Then, it decreased on day 21 to 73.25%. However, during phage incubation with Aquamicrobium H8, this mutation was also observed (on days 3 (12.45%), 9 (34.76%) and 15 (79.93%)). Therefore, it is possible that the mutation already occurred during the preparation of the experiment.
Five mutations were noted during the experiment in the gene encoding the tail tubular protein B. One of them first appeared on day 9 and remained throughout the experiment (location 25,728: thymine replaced by cytosine). Each of the other four mutations was only observed once; on day 3, a mutation was annotated on location 26,835 (27.03% of mapped reads), on day 9 on location 26,976 (29.73% of mapped reads) and on day 21 mutations were annotated on locations 25,923 (35.97% of mapped reads) and 27,164 (67.64% of mapped reads). It is possible that some of these mutations were responsible for the observed changes in phage predation efficacy toward Alcaligenaceae H5 over the course of the experiment. The influence of the mutations (those with frequencies higher than 30%) on the protein sequence is shown in Figure 5. Remarkably, no mutations were seen in this gene when the phage was incubated with Aquamicrobium H8.
Tubular proteins A and B form a tubular structure surrounded by tail fibers [45]. Tubular protein A is responsible for the attachment of the fibers, while tail tubular B forms the end of the tail [45]. In addition to their structural function, recent studies suggest that the tail tubular proteins have a role in host recognition and attachment to its surface [46,47]. Furthermore, the tail tubular protein A of the Klebsiella pneumoniae phage KP32 was found to exhibit lytic activity towards exopolysaccharide [48]. These studies highlight the possibility that the tail tubular proteins of Aquamicrobium phage P14 have multiple functions, and that changes in their amino acids can influence not only the injection of viral DNA into the host, but also the attachment to the host’s receptors.

3.4.4. Mutations in Genes Encoding Internal Virion Proteins

Two mutations were observed in genes encoding internal virion proteins. In one mutation, marked at position 34,414, a thymine was replaced by guanine on day 3 in 15.65% of the reads. By day 21, this mutation became dominant and 95.04% of the mapped reads had a guanine in this location. This dominance suggests that the mutation gave the phage some advantage over phages that lacked it. While mutations in the internal virion protein may seem irrelevant to phage predation abilities, research conducted on bacteriophage T7 demonstrated the opposite. In the case of bacteriophage T7, the internal virion proteins are believed to play a major role in the ejection of the viral genome from the phage capsid into the bacterial cell [49]. In addition, mutations in these proteins were shown to have important implications for phage predation abilities [50].
Since only three reads were mapped to this location at the beginning of the experiment (none of them had the mutation), the possibility that this mutation occurred during phage preparation cannot be dismissed. Nonetheless, this mutation was not detected in any of the samples when the phage was incubated with Aquamicrobium H8. Thus, even if it occurred during phage preparation, it only became dominant when the phage was incubated with Alcaligenaceae H5.
A mutation in another internal virion protein (location 30,484) appeared only when the phage was incubated with Aquamicrobium H8. In this case, the frequency of the mutation did not increase over the course of the experiment, peaking with a frequency of 34.96% of the reads on day 3, then falling to 10.40% of the reads on day 9 and 12.88% of the reads on day 21.

3.4.5. Mutations in the Gene Encoding the Tail Fiber Protein

In total, 20 mutations were annotated in the gene encoding the tail fiber protein when Aquamicrobium phage P14 was incubated with Alcaligenaceae H5 (10% frequency threshold, Table S1). Out of them, only nine were observed in more than 30% of the mapped reads and will be discussed further.
One mutation, which was only present on day 3 (in location 35,714) and when the phage was incubated with Aquamicrobium H8 (the control), was probably introduced during the experiment preparation. Another mutation (in location 37,165) was present 9 days after the beginning of the experiment, but was not detected in the following samples. Three mutations emerged on day 15 and were still present at high frequencies on day 21, and another three emerged only on day 21 (see Table 2).
Remarkably, the nucleotide in location 37,092 (originally thymine) was replaced in the majority of mapped reads by guanine on day 9, by adenine on day 15 and again by guanine on day 21. Each mutation resulted in a different amino acid in location 609 of the phage’s tail fiber protein. However, in both cases the Isoleucine (an amino acid with a hydrophobic side chain) was replaced by an amino acid with a positively charged side chain. On days 9 and 21, the Isoleucine was replaced by Arginine, while on day 15 it was replaced by Lysine. It is possible that a positively charged side chain in this location enhances the phage’s ability to attach to Alcaligenaceae H5. Nevertheless, further investigation is needed in order to confirm this hypothesis.
Figure 6 shows an alignment of the translated protein sequences. All nine mutations were nonsynonymous, and eight of them influenced the translated amino acid sequence near the C-terminus. This end of the protein sequence does not have any blast [51] alignment (hits). In contrast, the N-terminus has a blastx [43] match (E-value: 1.28 × 10−11) to the phage T7 tail fiber protein superfamily (pfam03906). This is the point at which the tail fiber protein of the bacteriophage T7 attaches to the phage’s tail, while the C-terminus is the side that recognizes and attaches to the host [52].
This observation correlates well with the findings of previous studies with RNA and DNA viruses [53,54,55,56]. Tétart et al. (1996) and Le et al. (2013) demonstrated that changes in the C-terminus of the tail fiber protein lead to changes in the host range of the phage [55,56]. Thus, mutations in the C-terminus of its tail fiber protein confer on the phage the ability to attach to and infect new hosts, while the N-terminus, which attaches to the phage’s tail, is conserved.

3.4.6. Mutations in Non-Coding Sequences

When using the 10% frequency threshold, two mutations in non-coding regions are evident (Figure 3). The mutation in location 24,876 appeared only when Aquamicrobium phage P14 was incubated with Alcaligenaceae H5 and only on day 15 (13.87% of the mapped reads). The other mutation was the insertion of a cytosine between nucleotides 570 and 571. This mutation appeared both when the phage was incubated with Alcaligenaceae H5 and when incubated with Aquamicrobium H8. Therefore, it is possible that it already occurred during the preparation of the experiment. Since the frequency of these mutations did not increase over time, it can be assumed that they did not confer on the phage any advantage.

3.4.7. Distribution of Variants along the Genome

Mutations were mainly observed in specific genes and were not evenly spread over the entire genome. Among the 15 mutations identified on day 21 (using a 30% frequency threshold), 7 were located in the gene encoding the tail fiber protein (46.7% of the mutations), which is only 1929 bp long (4.76% of the genome). Furthermore, one mutation was located in the gene encoding the tubular tail protein A, and three were identified in the gene encoding tubular tail protein B. Thus, 11 out of 15 mutations (73.3%) were located in tail-associated genes (Table 2).
To explore the tendencies of specific genes to mutate, the number of mutations observed in a gene (in the whole phage community at a certain time point) was divided by the gene’s length. The average variances from the reference genome were 0.10, 0.20, 0.25 and 0.37 mutations per 1000 bp for days 3, 9, 15 and 21, respectively. The average variances for the tail fiber protein were 0.5, 1.0, 2.1 and 3.6 mutations per 1000 bp for days 3, 9, 15 and 21, respectively. Thus, the average variance for the gene encoding the tail fiber protein was significantly higher than that for the whole genome.
There are several possible explanations for this observation, and they raise important evolutionary questions. First, it is possible that while mutations are created randomly along the genome, some mutations, those that confer on the phage an advantage, become frequent. Thus, selection stress in the environment may dictate which genes show a tendency for mutation. On the other hand, it is also possible that the genes that enable the phage to shift its host range are more prone to mutation, and are not as sensitive to modification as other genes. These questions are also relevant to specific regions within a single gene, such as that of the gene encoding the tail fiber protein. In the case of this gene, the mutations were mainly located in a region which encodes the area near the C-terminus of the tail fiber protein; an area which is used in host recognition.
The fact that most of the observed mutations occurred in tail-related genes correlates well with previously published work by Yosef et al. (2017) [57]. In their work, the researchers extended the host range of a T7 phage by designing hybrid particles that displayed various phage tail and tail fiber proteins. Similarly, the random mutations in the tail-related genes of Aquamicrobium phage P14 allow it to explore new infection strategies that are suited to Alcaligenaceae H5.
Interestingly, in the study by Crill et al. (2000) [32], φX174 showed mutations in almost all of its genes as a result of switching hosts. However, more than half of the reversions (nucleotides that swapped back to the previous nucleotide due to incubation with the previous host) were spotted in the gene encoding the major capsid protein. Since φX174 has no tail, the major capsid protein is responsible for phage interaction with the host cell membrane and receptors. Taken together, these findings and observations strengthen the conclusion that the phage’s ability to rapidly alter the proteins responsible for host recognition allows it to adapt to new hosts.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the Aquamicrobium phage P14, a phage belonging to the Autographiviridae family, was grown with Alcaligenaceae H5 for 21 days. This experiment allowed us to monitor the mutations that occurred in the phage genome over time, and to observe changes in phage efficacy toward its host. Indeed, during the 21-day experiment, the phage efficacy toward the Alcaligenaceae H5 host increased. Furthermore, mutations in the genome were observed in specific regions, and mostly in the gene encoding the tail fiber protein, which is responsible for host recognition. The experiment was performed once and therefore more biological replicates are needed in order to confirm our conclusions. In addition, further investigation is needed to answer basic evolutionary questions about the tendency of specific genes to mutate, and the implications of those mutations for host shifts and speciation.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/12/10/1132/s1, Table S1: Variants (with frequency above 10%) in the Aquamicrobium phage P14 genome over time when incubated with Alcaligenaceae H5, Table S2: Variants (with frequency above 10%) in the Aquamicrobium phage P14 genome over time when incubated with Aquamicrobium H8.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: M.B., M.d.L. and A.K.; Formal analysis: M.d.L.; Funding acquisition: A.K.; Investigation: M.B. and O.B.D.; Writing—original draft: M.B., M.d.L., and A.K.; Writing—review and editing: M.B., M.d.L., O.B.D. and A.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft: CH 731/2-1; Ne’ot Hovav Council, Israel N/A; Israeli Ministry of Science, Technology and Space 3-9724; the Kreitman Foundation N/A; Israeli Council for Higher Education N/A; the Rieger Foundation N/A; Novo Nordisk Fonden NNF10CC1016517; Novo Nordisk Fonden NNF14OC0009473.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the German Research Foundation DFG (grant number CH 731/2-1) and the Ne’ot Hovav Council, Israel. We would like to thank the Kreitman Foundation, the Israeli Ministry of Science, Technology and Space (3-9724), the Israeli Council for Higher Education, the Rieger Foundation and the Novo Nordisk Foundation (NNF10CC1016517; NNF14OC0009473) for their support to M.d.L.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Withey, S.; Cartmell, E.; Avery, L.M.; Stephenson, T. Bacteriophages—Potential for application in wastewater treatment processes. Sci. Total Environ. 2005, 339, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Suttle, C.A. Marine viruses—Major players in the global ecosystem. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2007, 5, 801–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Johnke, J.; Cohen, Y.; de Leeuw, M.; Kushmaro, A.; Jurkevitch, E.; Chatzinotas, A. Multiple micro-predators controlling bacterial communities in the environment. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2014, 27, 185–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Fuhrman, J.A. Marine viruses and their biogeochemical and ecological effects. Nature 1999, 399, 541–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jacquet, S.; Miki, T.; Noble, R.; Peduzzi, P.; Wilhelm, S. Viruses in aquatic ecosystems: Important advancements of the last 20 years and prospects for the future in the field of microbial oceanography and limnology. Adv. Oceanogr. Limnol. 2010, 1, 97–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sime-Ngando, T. Environmental bacteriophages: Viruses of microbes in aquatic ecosystems. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Guenther, S.; Huwyler, D.; Richard, S.; Loessner, M.J. Virulent bacteriophage for efficient biocontrol of Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat foods. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 93–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Kocharunchitt, C.; Ross, T.; McNeil, D.L. Use of bacteriophages as biocontrol agents to control Salmonella associated with seed sprouts. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2009, 128, 453–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sillankorva, S.M.; Oliveira, H.; Azeredo, J. Bacteriophages and their role in food safety. Int. J. Microbiol. 2012, 2012, 863945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Carlton, R.M.; Noordman, W.H.; Biswas, B.; De Meester, E.D.; Loessner, M.J. Bacteriophage P100 for control of Listeria monocytogenes in foods: Genome sequence, bioinformatic analyses, oral toxicity study, and application. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2005, 43, 301–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hagens, S.; Loessner, M.J. Application of bacteriophages for detection and control of foodborne pathogens. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007, 76, 513–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Bhunchoth, A.; Phironrit, N.; Leksomboon, C.; Chatchawankanphanich, O.; Kotera, S.; Narulita, E.; Kawasaki, T.; Fujie, M.; Yamada, T. Isolation of Ralstonia solanacearum-infecting bacteriophages from tomato fields in Chiang Mai, Thailand, and their experimental use as biocontrol agents. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2015, 118, 1023–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Weber-Dabrowska, B.; Jończyk-Matysiak, E.; Zaczek, M.; Łobocka, M.; Łusiak-Szelachowska, M.; Górski, A. Bacteriophage procurement for therapeutic purposes. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wu, Q.; Liu, W.T. Determination of virus abundance, diversity and distribution in a municipal wastewater treatment plant. Water Res. 2009, 43, 1101–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Shapiro, O.H.; Kushmaro, A.; Brenner, A. Bacteriophage predation regulates microbial abundance and diversity in a full-scale bioreactor treating industrial wastewater. ISME J. 2010, 4, 327–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Shapiro, O.H.; Kushmaro, A. Bacteriophage ecology in environmental biotechnology processes. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2011, 22, 449–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Khan, M.A.; Satoh, H.; Katayama, H.; Kurisu, F.; Mino, T. Bacteriophages isolated from activated sludge processes and their polyvalency. Water Res. 2002, 36, 3364–3370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Otawa, K.; Lee, S.H.; Yamazoe, A.; Onuki, M.; Satoh, H.; Mino, T. Abundance, diversity, and dynamics of viruses on microorganisms in activated sludge processes. Microb. Ecol. 2007, 53, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Petrovski, S.; Seviour, R.J.; Tillett, D. Characterization of the genome of the polyvalent lytic bacteriophage GTE2, which has potential for biocontrol of Gordonia-, Rhodococcus-, and Nocardia-stabilized foams in activated sludge plants. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 3923–3929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Thomas, J.A.; Soddell, J.A.; Kurtböke, D.I. Fighting foam with phages? Water Sci. Technol. 2002, 46, 511–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Koskella, B.; Meaden, S. Understanding bacteriophage specificity in natural microbial communities. Viruses 2013, 5, 806–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Baranowski, E.; Ruiz-Jarabo, C.M.; Domingo, E. Evolution of cell recognition by viruses. Science 2001, 292, 1102–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hyman, P.; Abedon, S.T. Bacteriophage host range and bacterial resistance. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 70, 217–248. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Weinbauer, M.G. Ecology of prokaryotic viruses. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2004, 28, 127–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Labrie, S.J.; Samson, J.E.; Moineau, S. Bacteriophage resistance mechanisms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 8, 317–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Buckling, A.; Rainey, P.B. Antagonistic coevolution between a bacterium and a bacteriophage. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2002, 269, 931–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Gómez, P.; Buckling, A. Bacteria-phage antagonistic coevolution in soil. Science 2011, 332, 106–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Pal, C.; Maciá, M.D.; Oliver, A.; Schachar, I.; Buckling, A. Coevolution with viruses drives the evolution of bacterial mutation rates. Nature 2007, 450, 1079–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Woolhouse, M.E.J.; Webster, J.P.; Domingo, E.; Charlesworth, B.; Levin, B.R. Biological and biomedical implications of the co-evolution of pathogens and their hosts. Nat. Genet. 2002, 32, 569–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Longdon, B.; Brockhurst, M.A.; Russell, C.A.; Welch, J.J.; Jiggins, F.M. The evolution and genetics of virus host shifts. PLoS Pathog. 2014, 10, e1004395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Ferris, M.T.; Joyce, P.; Burch, C.L. High frequency of mutations that expand the host range of an RNA virus. Genetics 2007, 176, 1013–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Crill, W.D.; Wichman, H.A.; Bull, J.J. Evolutionary reversals during viral adaptation to alternating hosts. Genetics 2000, 154, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. De Leeuw, M.; Baron, M.; Brenner, A.; Kushmaro, A. Genome analysis of a novel broad host range proteobacteria phage isolated from a bioreactor treating industrial wastewater. Genes 2017, 8, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Benson, D.A.; Clark, K.; Karsch-Mizrachi, I.; Lipman, D.J.; Ostell, J.; Sayers, E.W. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, D30–D35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Tang, N.; San Clemente, H.; Roy, S.; Bécard, G.; Zhao, B.; Roux, C. A Survey of the gene repertoire of Gigaspora rosea unravels conserved features among glomeromycota for obligate biotrophy. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Gasteiger, E.; Gattiker, A.; Hoogland, C.; Ivanyi, I.; Appel, R.D.; Bairoch, A. ExPASy: The proteomics server for in-depth protein knowledge and analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31, 3784–3788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Koskella, B.; Brockhurst, M.A. Bacteria-phage coevolution as a driver of ecological and evolutionary processes in microbial communities. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2014, 38, 916–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Ripp, S.; Miller, R.V. The role of pseudolysogeny in bacteriophage-host interactions in a natural freshwater environment. Microbiology 1997, 143, 2065–2070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Glowacka-Rutkowska, A.; Gozdek, A.; Empel, J.; Gawor, J.; Zuchniewicz, K.; Kozinska, A.; Debski, J.; Gromadka, R.; Lobocka, M. The ability of lytic staphylococcal podovirus vB-SauP-phiAGO1.3 to coexist in equilibrium with its host facilitates the selection of host mutants of attenuated virulence but does not preclude the phage antistaphylococcal activity in a nematode infection model. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 3227. [Google Scholar]
  40. Latino, L.; Midoux, C.; Hauck, Y.; Vergnaud, G.; Pourcel, C. Pseudolysogeny and sequential mutations build multiresistance to virulent bacteriophages in pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbiology 2016, 162, 748–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yosef, I.; Edgar, R.; Levy, A.; Amitai, G.; Sorek, R.; Munitz, A.; Qimron, U. Natural selection underlies apparent stress-induced mutagenesis in a bacteriophage infection model. Nat. Microbiol. 2016, 1, 16047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Krzywinski, M.; Schein, J.; Birol, I.; Connors, J.; Gascoyne, R.; Horsman, D.; Jones, S.J.; Marra, M.A. Circos: An information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 2009, 19, 1639–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Johnson, M.; Zaretskaya, I.; Raytselis, Y.; Merezhuk, Y.; McGinnis, S.; Madden, T.L. NCBI BLAST: A better web interface. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36, W5–W9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Kelley, L.A.; Mezulis, S.; Yates, C.M.; Wass, M.N.; Sternberg, M.J.E. The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis. Nat. Protoc. 2015, 10, 845–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Cuervo, A.; Pulido-Cid, M.; Chagoyen, M.; Arranz, R.; González-García, V.A.; Garcia-Doval, C.; Castón, J.R.; Valpuesta, J.M.; Van Raaij, M.J.; Martín-Benito, J.; et al. Structural Characterization of the Bacteriophage T7 Tail Machinery. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 26290–26299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Hu, M.; Zhang, H.; Gu, D.; Ma, Y.; Zhou, X. Identification of a novel bacterial receptor that binds tail tubular proteins and mediates phage infection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2020, 9, 855–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Kemp, P.; Garcia, L.R.; Molineux, I.J. Changes in bacteriophage T7 virion structure at the initiation of infection. Virology 2005, 340, 307–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Pyra, A.; Brzozowska, E.; Pawlik, K.; Gamian, A.; Dauter, M.; Dauter, Z. Tail tubular protein A: A dual-function tail protein of Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteriophage KP. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Hu, B.; Margolin, W.; Molineux, I.J.; Liu, J. The bacteriophage T7 virion undergoes extensive structural remodeling during infection. Science 2013, 339, 576–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Chang, C.Y.; Kemp, P.; Molineux, I.J. Gp15 and gp16 cooperate in translocating bacteriophage T7 DNA into the infected cell. Virology 2010, 398, 176–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Altschul, S.F.; Gish, W.; Miller, W.; Myers, E.W.; Lipman, D.J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 215, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Garcia-Doval, C.; Van Raaij, M.J. Structure of the receptor-binding carboxy-terminal domain of bacteriophage T7 tail fibers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 9390–9395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. De Sordi, L.; Khanna, V.; Debarbieux, L. The gut microbiota facilitates drifts in the genetic diversity and infectivity of bacterial viruses. Cell Host Microbe 2017, 22, 801–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Duffy, S.; Burch, C.L.; Turner, P.E. Evolution of host specificity drives reproductive isolation among RNA viruses. Evolution (N. Y.) 2007, 61, 2614–2622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Tétart, F.; Repoila, F.; Monod, C.; Krisch, H.M. Bacteriophage T4 host range is expanded by duplications of a small domain of the tail fiber adhesin. J. Mol. Biol. 1996, 258, 726–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Le, S.; He, X.; Tan, Y.; Huang, G.; Zhang, L.; Lux, R.; Shi, W.; Hu, F. Mapping the tail fiber as the receptor binding protein responsible for differential host specificity of pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteriophages PaP1 and JG. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e68562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Yosef, I.; Goren, M.G.; Globus, R.; Molshanski-Mor, S.; Qimron, U. Extending the host range of bacteriophage particles for DNA transduction. Mol. Cell 2017, 66, 721–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Viruses 12 01132 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the experimental setting.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the experimental setting.
Viruses 12 01132 g001
Viruses 12 01132 g002 550
Figure 2. Changes in phage efficacy during the course of the experiment. Each column represents the ratio, at different time points, between the PFUs/mL of Aquamicrobium phage P14 when enumerated with Alcaligenaceae H5 (three technical replicates) and when enumerated with the Aquamicrobium H14 (three technical replicates). The results are shown as the mean ± standard deviation.
Figure 2. Changes in phage efficacy during the course of the experiment. Each column represents the ratio, at different time points, between the PFUs/mL of Aquamicrobium phage P14 when enumerated with Alcaligenaceae H5 (three technical replicates) and when enumerated with the Aquamicrobium H14 (three technical replicates). The results are shown as the mean ± standard deviation.
Viruses 12 01132 g002
Viruses 12 01132 g003 550
Figure 3. Variance from the reference genome of Aquamicrobium phage P14 over the course of the experiment. By each position at which the frequency of a mutation was higher than 10% of the mapped reads, a bar is shown to indicate the frequency (0–100%, grey line every 25%). Genes encoding hypothetical proteins are marked in grey while genes encoding proteins with an identified function are marked in color. The image was produced using Circos [42].
Figure 3. Variance from the reference genome of Aquamicrobium phage P14 over the course of the experiment. By each position at which the frequency of a mutation was higher than 10% of the mapped reads, a bar is shown to indicate the frequency (0–100%, grey line every 25%). Genes encoding hypothetical proteins are marked in grey while genes encoding proteins with an identified function are marked in color. The image was produced using Circos [42].
Viruses 12 01132 g003
Viruses 12 01132 g004 550
Figure 4. The predicted structure of the DNA polymerase A constructed using Phyre2 [44]. (A) The whole structure of the protein; Glycines 134 and 137 can be seen in the upper right corner. (B) Focus on amino acids 134 and 137. Grey: the structure with Glycines; Cyan: the structure with Valines.
Figure 4. The predicted structure of the DNA polymerase A constructed using Phyre2 [44]. (A) The whole structure of the protein; Glycines 134 and 137 can be seen in the upper right corner. (B) Focus on amino acids 134 and 137. Grey: the structure with Glycines; Cyan: the structure with Valines.
Viruses 12 01132 g004
Viruses 12 01132 g005 550
Figure 5. Amino acid sequences (61–180 and 541–600) of the tail tubular protein B and the mutations that appeared during the experiment (colored by polarity). Note: for simplicity, all mutations that occurred with more than 30% frequency at a certain time point are shown on the same protein sequence; this does not necessarily mean, however, that all the mutations occurred on the same specific protein sequence.
Figure 5. Amino acid sequences (61–180 and 541–600) of the tail tubular protein B and the mutations that appeared during the experiment (colored by polarity). Note: for simplicity, all mutations that occurred with more than 30% frequency at a certain time point are shown on the same protein sequence; this does not necessarily mean, however, that all the mutations occurred on the same specific protein sequence.
Viruses 12 01132 g005
Viruses 12 01132 g006 550
Figure 6. Amino acid sequence (91–150 and 561–642) of the tail fiber protein showing the mutations that appeared during the experiment (colored by polarity). Note: for simplicity, all mutations that occurred with more than 30% frequency at a certain time point are shown on the same protein sequence; this does not necessarily mean, however, that all the mutations occurred on the same specific protein sequence.
Figure 6. Amino acid sequence (91–150 and 561–642) of the tail fiber protein showing the mutations that appeared during the experiment (colored by polarity). Note: for simplicity, all mutations that occurred with more than 30% frequency at a certain time point are shown on the same protein sequence; this does not necessarily mean, however, that all the mutations occurred on the same specific protein sequence.
Viruses 12 01132 g006
Table
Table 1. Alcaligenaceae H5 and Aquamicrobium phage P14 concentrations during the experiment (phage concentration was determined using Alcaligenaceae H5 for the plaque assay).
Table 1. Alcaligenaceae H5 and Aquamicrobium phage P14 concentrations during the experiment (phage concentration was determined using Alcaligenaceae H5 for the plaque assay).
DayBacteria Concentration (CFU/mL)Phage Concentration (PFU/mL)
02.3 × 107 ± 3.9 × 1061.3 × 106 ± 6.5 × 105
61.2 × 107 ± 2.0 × 1061.9 × 107 ± 1.9 × 106
139.7 × 106 ± 1.6 × 1063.1 × 107 ± 1.4 × 106
202.9 × 107 ± 1.3 × 1061.3 × 106 ± 9.8 × 105
Table
Table 2. Variants (with frequency above 30%) in the Aquamicrobium phage P14 genome over time when incubated with Alcaligenaceae H5 and when incubated with Aquamicrobium H8. Frequency is indicated in parentheses. Variant types: SNV—single nucleotide variant; MNV—multiple nucleotide variant; insertion—addition of a nucleotide; and deletion—removal of a nucleotide. t *—the nucleotides in mapped reads present at the beginning of the experiment; due to the low coverage, the number of mapped reads is given in parentheses.
Table 2. Variants (with frequency above 30%) in the Aquamicrobium phage P14 genome over time when incubated with Alcaligenaceae H5 and when incubated with Aquamicrobium H8. Frequency is indicated in parentheses. Variant types: SNV—single nucleotide variant; MNV—multiple nucleotide variant; insertion—addition of a nucleotide; and deletion—removal of a nucleotide. t *—the nucleotides in mapped reads present at the beginning of the experiment; due to the low coverage, the number of mapped reads is given in parentheses.
Incubation with Alcaligenaceae H5 Incubation with Aquamicrobium H8
GenePositionTypeReferencet * = 0Day 3Day 9Day 15Day 21Day 3Day 9Day 15Day 21Changes in Protein Sequence
-570^571Insertion-C(3), (1) C (50.27%) C (32.76%)C (42.70%) -
Seryl-threonyl protein kinase4099..4100DeletionAGA(3), (1) (71.11%)(91.83%)(93.37%)(30.55%)(31.69%) Glu182->
VTCSINVRAWSCFGCRTGRV
DNA polymerase A11,077SNVGT (1)T (70.58%)T (65.97%)T (63.01%)T (64.44%)T (69.88%)T (63.34%)T (70.53%)T (70.23%)Gly134->Val
11,086SNVGT (2)T (73.98%)T (69.46%)T (66.45%)T (66.07%)T (69.64%)T (63.40%)T (72.76%)T (72.84%)Gly137->Val
Tail tubular protein A24,958SNVCC (2)T (44.52%)T (59.76%)T (98.11%)T (73.25%) T (34.76%)T (70.03%) Pro21->Leu
Tail tubular protein B25,728SNVT- C (52.85%)C (93.92%)C (74.19%) Met77->Thr
25,923SNVGG (2) T (35.97%) Arg142->Leu
27,164SNVGG (1) A (67.64%) Glu556->Lys
Internal virion protein30,484SNVCC (6), T(2) T (34.96%) Leu534 ->Phe
Internal virion protein34,414SNVTT (3) G (68.26%)G (95.04%) His1055->Gln
Tail fiber protein35,714SNVGG(3), A(1)A (42.91%) A (35.95%)A (56.24%)A (82.92%) Ala150 -> Thr
36,984SNVCC (4) A (54.63%) Ala573 -> Glu
37,023SNVGG(2), T(1) T (31.58%)T (39.81%) G586->Val
37,049SNVGC(1), G(1) A (37.67%) A (35.67%) Ala595 -> Glu
37,082SNVAA (3) C (79.15%)C (59.96%) Glu606-> Pro
37,085SNVGG (3) A (37.98%) D607->Asn
37,092SNVTT (3) G (60.30%)A (72.33%)G (93.39%) Days 9 and 21:
Ile609->Arg
Day 15:
Ile609->Lys
37,146..37,154DeletionAGACTAACCAGA * TAACC (2) (40.84%)(37.48%) ETNP->Ala627
37,148..37,149MNVACAC (1), AT (1) CT (76.17%)CT (86.69%) Thr628->Leu
37,151..37,152MNVAAAA (2) CG (77.18%)CG (87.24%) Asn629->Arg
AG (44.08%) Asn629->Ser
37,155SNVCC (2) A (30.27%) Pro630->His
37,165MNVTT (3) A (70.17%) A (51.20%) Ser633->Arg
37,187SNVAA (5) G (53.73%) Ile641->Val

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

de Leeuw, M.; Baron, M.; Ben David, O.; Kushmaro, A. Molecular Insights into Bacteriophage Evolution toward Its Host. Viruses 2020, 12, 1132. https://doi.org/10.3390/v12101132

AMA Style

de Leeuw M, Baron M, Ben David O, Kushmaro A. Molecular Insights into Bacteriophage Evolution toward Its Host. Viruses. 2020; 12(10):1132. https://doi.org/10.3390/v12101132

Chicago/Turabian Style

de Leeuw, Marina, Maayan Baron, Oshrit Ben David, and Ariel Kushmaro. 2020. "Molecular Insights into Bacteriophage Evolution toward Its Host" Viruses 12, no. 10: 1132. https://doi.org/10.3390/v12101132

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop