Next Article in Journal
“French Phage Network” Annual Conference 2018—Fourth Meeting Report
Next Article in Special Issue
Presence of Antibodies against Sindbis Virus in the Israeli Population: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study
Previous Article in Journal
Don’t Shut the Stable Door after the Phage Has Bolted—The Importance of Bacteriophage Inactivation in Food Environments
Previous Article in Special Issue
First Isolation and Phylogenetic Analyses of Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus in Lower Saxony, Germany
Open AccessArticle

Detection of a Novel Phlebovirus (Drin Virus) from Sand Flies in Albania

1
Institute of Public Health, Tirana 1001, Albania
2
Unite des Virus Emergents (Aix-Marseille Univ–IRD 190–Inserm 1207–IHU Mediterranee Infection), 13005 Marseille, France
3
Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2019, 11(5), 469; https://doi.org/10.3390/v11050469
Received: 17 April 2019 / Revised: 20 May 2019 / Accepted: 21 May 2019 / Published: 23 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emerging Arboviruses)

Abstract

Phlebotomine sand flies are generalist vectors with significant implications for public health. They are able to transmit phleboviruses that cause sand fly fever, headaches, or meningitis in humans. Albania is a country in Southeast Europe with a typical Mediterranean climate which provides convenient conditions for the presence of sand flies. Hence, the circulation of phleboviruses, such as the Toscana and Balkan viruses, has been recently described in the country. We followed a virus discovery approach on sand fly samples collected in 2015 and 2016 in seven regions of Albania, with the aim to investigate and characterize potentially circulating phleboviruses in phlebotomine sand flies. A presumed novel phlebovirus was detected in a pool consisting of 24 Phlebotomus neglectus males. The virus was provisionally named the Drin virus after a river near the locality of Kukës, where the infected sand flies were trapped. Genetic and phylogenetic analysis revealed that the Drin virus is closely related to the Corfou (CFUV) virus, isolated in the 1980s from Phlebotomus major sand flies on the eponymous island of Greece, and may also be involved in human infections because of its similarity to the sand fly fever Sicilian virus. The latter justifies further studies to specifically address this concern. Together with recent findings, this study confirms that Albania and the Balkan peninsula are hot spots for phleboviruses.
Keywords: phlebovirus; sand fly-borne phleboviruses; sand fly fever; sand fly fever Sicilian (SFSV) virus; Albania phlebovirus; sand fly-borne phleboviruses; sand fly fever; sand fly fever Sicilian (SFSV) virus; Albania

1. Introduction

According to their antigenic relationships, old world sand fly-borne phleboviruses (genus Phlebovirus, family Phenuiviridae, order Bunyavirales) can be classified into three serological complexes, which are also regarded as taxonomic species or tentative species—the Sandfly fever Naples phlebovirus species (SFNV), the Salehabad phlebovirus species, and the Sandfly fever Sicilian phlebovirus tentative species (SFSV). The SFNV includes the following viruses: Arrábida (ARRV), Balkan (BALKV), Fermo (FERV), Gordil (GORV), Granada (GRAV), Massilia (MASV), Punique (PUNV), Saddaguia (SADV), Saint-Floris (SAFV), sand fly fever Naples (SFNV), Tehran (THEV), Toscana (TOSV), and Zerdali (ZERV) (https://talk.ictvonline.org/taxonomy/). The Salehabad phlebovirus species includes Adana (ADAV), Adria (ADRV), Alcube (ALCV), Arbia (ARBV), Arumowot (AMTV), Medjerda Valley (MVV), Odrenisrou (ODRV), Olbia (OLBV), Salehabad (SALV), Bregalaka (BREV), and Zaba (ZABAV) (https://talk.ictvonline.org/taxonomy/). The SFSV tentative phlebovirus species is a serocomplex which includes several phlebovirus species that are yet to be recognized by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV). The SFSV and Corfou (CFUV) phlebovirus tentative species are antigenically and genetically close to each other and may be grouped together as a unique species [1,2,3].
Most phleboviruses use sand flies as vectors [4]. Phlebovirus distribution and circulation peaks are closely related to vector presence and activity. Sand flies are broadly distributed in regions bordering the Mediterranean basin. They are abundant in peri-urban and rural environments, which are concentrated near human and domestic animal habitats [5]. Therefore, human populations are exposed to sand fly–transmitted diseases, among them phlebovirus-related diseases. For example, TOSV, which was isolated in Italy in 1971, is of major concern as it causes central nervous system infection leading to acute meningitis in humans, whereas the SFNV and SFSV only induce a transient febrile illness known as the “three-day fever”, “phlebotomus fever”, or “pappataci fever” [6,7,8]. The ADRV, detected in phlebotomine sand flies in Albania, is the only virus that is found to be associated with human disease within the Salehabad phlebovirus species [9,10]. Phleboviruses are emerging pathogens that raise veterinary and public health concerns. Recently, a large number of novel phleboviruses have been identified in the Mediterranean area and have been included in existing species or in the tentative ones detailed above.
Albania has a typical Mediterranean climate that provides convenient environmental conditions for the active circulation of sand flies between May and November. To date, a total of eight sand fly species have been described in Albania, P. neglectus being the most prevalent (75.6%), followed by P. perfiliewi (14.4%), P. papatasi (4.6%), P. tobbi (3.6%), P. similis (1.8%), P. simici (<1%), Sergentomyia dentata (<1%), and Sergentomyia minuta (<1%) [11,12].
Recently, several phleboviruses were identified in specific areas of Albania—the BALKV virus, belonging to the SFNV species and the ADRV virus, belonging to the Salehabad phlebovirus species [9,13].
Our aim was to investigate and characterize the phleboviruses in phlebotomine sand flies collected in more than one region in Albania from June to September of 2015 and 2016.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Sand Fly Trapping

CDC miniature light traps and CO2 baited traps (BioQuip Products, Rancho Dominguez, CA, USA) were used to collect sand flies in seven regions of Albania from June to September of 2015 and 2016 (Figure 1).
Live sand flies were placed on a solid–CO2 container for transportation to the laboratory and pooled in 1.5 mL tubes based on sex, trapping site, and trapping day, with up to 30 individuals per pool. The tubes were stored at −80 °C. No morphological identification of the sand flies was performed prior to viral testing to avoid virus or RNA degradation [13,14].

2.2. Sand Fly Homogenization, Tentative Isolation in Ncell Lines and Baby Mice

A volume of 600 μL of Eagle’s minimal essential medium (EMEM) (enriched with 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% penicillin–streptomycin, 1% (200 mM) l-glutamine, 1% kanamycin, and 3% amphotericin B (Fungizone)) with 3 mm tungsten beads added into tubes. Sand fly tissues were homogenized by a Mixer Mill MM300 (Qiagen, Courtaboeuf, France), and the mixture was centrifuged at 5800× g for 10 min.
A volume of 50 μL homogenate supernatant was inoculated into 450 μL Vero cells in enriched EMEM without FBS. The cells were then incubated at room temperature for 1 h. After 1 h, 2.5 mL of fresh EMEM with 5% FBS was added and the nucleons incubated at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. The nucleons were examined daily for the presence of a cytopathic effect (CPE) and passaged 8 times. In each passage, 200 μL of supernatant medium was collected from the nucleons and tested by reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) with stratifin (SFN), Nphlebo, and Lambert primers [14,15,16,17].
A volume of 2 μL of the original homogenate supernatant was used in an attempt to infect 2 to 3 day-old Oncins France 1 (OF1) mice intracerebrally. The mice were observed for signs of disease and sacrificed on days 6 to 14 of the experiment. These animal experiments were carried out according to the animal experiment regulations of Aix-Marseille Université under the license A1301309. The RNA was extracted from the brain tissues of the mice by using a QIAcube HT system with a QIAamp 96 Virus QIAcube HT Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and studied for the presence of the Drin virus.

2.3. Nucleic Acid Extraction and Molecular Assays

A volume of 200 μL homogenate supernatant was used for nucleic acid extraction. For the 2015 sand fly samples, the extraction was performed by a BioRobot EZ1-XL Advanced (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) with a Virus Extraction Mini Kit (Qiagen). The samples from 2016 were extracted using QIAcube HT system with a QIAamp 96 Virus QIAcube HT Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany).
RT-PCR was performed with the Super Script III (Thermo Fisher Scientific) kit using three different systems: (1) the Nphlebo1S/1R system targeting the polymerase gene in the L RNA segment, (2) the SFNV1S/1R system targeting the nucleoprotein gene in the S RNA segment, and (3) the Lambert Phlebovirus system, also targeting the S RNA segment [14,15,16,17]. The cycling program of the RT-PCR reaction consisted of 48 °C for 45 min and 94 °C for 2 min, followed by 40 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, the annealing temperature for 1 min, and 68 °C for 45 s, with a final elongation step at 68 °C for 7 min.
Nested PCRs were performed with a DreamTaq kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with Nphlebo2 and SFNV2 primers. The following cycle was used for the Nested-PCRs: 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, the annealing temperature for 45 s, and 72 °C for 30 s, with a final elongation step at 72 °C for 7 min.
Real-time quantitative RT-PCR (RT–qPCR) was performed with the EXPRESS qPCR SuperMix Universal (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) kit and the Quant Studio 12K Flex System. The cycling program of the RT-qPCR reaction consisted of 50 °C for 5 min and 94 °C for 20 min, followed by 40 cycles at 95 °C for 3 s, then 60 °C for 30 s. Specific primers were used to screen for the SFSV group viruses and TOSV [8,18].
The Drin virus was identified as closely related to the Corfou virus based on the partial sequence obtained from the Nphlebo primers in the polymerase (L RNA).
Because of the closeness between the polymerase partial sequences of the Drin and CFUV viruses, we designed new primers using the CFUV virus sequences as a reference. We assumed that these primers would also amplify the Drin virus segments (Table 1; Figure 2).
Additionally, we designed real-time RT-qPCR assays specifically targeting the Drin virus L-, M- and S-segments to test all the pools to check whether the Drin virus sequences were present in any of the other analyzed pools (Table 1; Figure 2). The same protocols were used for RT-PCR and real-time RT-qPCR, as described above.
The positive PCR products were purified using a QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and sequenced with next-generation sequencing (NGS) using an AU4c Ion-Torrent PGM platform as described [19].

2.4. Phylogenetic Analysis

The sequence data was analyzed through CLC Genomics Workbench version 11 software (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Homologous sequences from phleboviruses were aligned with homologous sequences of interest using Clustal W in Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis 6 (MEGA6) software [20]. The evolutionary history was inferred by the neighbor–joining (NJ) method using the Kimura 2-parameter model with 1000 bootstrap replication.

2.5. Genotyping the Sand Flies of Virus-Positive Pool

To identify the sand fly species constitutive of the Drin virus positive pool, barcoding PCR was performed with 3 μL of nucleic acid to amplify partial regions of the cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) and cytochrome b (Cytb) genes, respectively, as previously described [21,22]. The PCR products were purified and sequenced through NGS. The reads were compared with available sequences in the GenBank sequence database using CLC Genomic Workbench 11 software (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany).

3. Results

3.1. Sand Fly Collection and Virus Testing

A total of 2502 sand flies were tested for phlebovirus presence, 533 collected in 2015 (298 females and 244 males), and 1969 in 2016 (1064 females and 905 males) in seven different regions of Albania (Figure 1). They were organized in a total of 118 pools (27 and 91 pools in 2015 and 2016, respectively) which were tested as described above. Pool #17, containing 24 male sand flies collected in 2015 in the village of Domaj, in the municipality of Kukës, provided a PCR product of the expected size with polymerase Nphlebo primers [16], and a positive result with SFSV RT-qPCR tested using SFSV primers (Ct = 26,9) that are specific for SFSV and CFUV viruses [8]. The real-time RT-qPCR assay designed from CFUV L, Gc, and S RNA sequences was positive with Ct values <29. Of the 118 pools that were studied, only Pool #17 was found to be positive. Genotyping the sand flies of the virus-positive Pool #17 by NGS analysis of the PCR product provided 6910 reads for the COI gene and 397 reads for the Cytb gene. All 7307 reads 100% matched the P. neglectus sequences, and thus demonstrated that the 24 sand flies contained in Pool #17 belonged to the P. neglectus species.

3.2. Attempts of Virus Isolation

Vero cells inoculated with supernatant corresponding to Pool #17 were examined daily for CPE. Eight blind passages were done, but no CPE was observed. In addition, each passage was tested for the presence of Drin virus RNA using the SFN, Nphlebo, and Lambert sets of primers; the results were consistently negative, indicating that the Drin virus was not isolated in cell culture. For this reason, we decided to try virus isolation by using intracerebral (IC) inoculation into suckling mice. A total of 25 baby mice were injected with sand fly homogenate supernatant with the attempt to isolate the Drin virus. None of the mice developed clinical signs, which suggested that the Drin virus was not replicating in their brain tissues. Baby mice were euthanized at 7 days post-IC injection, the brain was then collected postmortem, with nucleic acid extraction performed as described above and tested with different PCR assays. All results were negative, showing that the Drin virus had not been isolated.

3.3. Genetic Characterization and Phylogenetic Analysis of Drin Virus

Partial sequences of the three RNA segments (GenBank accession numbers: MK904582, MK904583, and MK904584) were amplified and sequenced. In all cases, the Drin virus sequences were most closely related to, but clearly distinct from, those of the CFUV virus (Figure 2).
Regardless of the gene used for analysis, the Drin virus is grouped with the CFUV and Toros viruses (with 99–100% bootstrap support), the three viruses forming a sister cluster to the group including the Dashli virus and strains of SFSV (Figure 3).
All these viruses form a solid monophyletic cluster which is consistent with the proposal that they should all be placed within a single species, one that is yet to be recognized by the ICTV as a SFSV species.

4. Discussion

The viruses belonging to the SFSV and CFUV tentative phlebovirus species have previously been described in Italy, Turkey, Cyprus, Greece, Iran, and Ethiopia, but they have never been detected in Albania or the other countries of the Western region of the Balkans [1,3,23,24,25,26]. Although SFSV and CFUV viruses were respectively discovered in 1943 and 1985, both remained classified as tentative species within the genus Phlebovirus. Recently, the isolation of the Dashli virus in Iran has been an opportunity to propose to group SFSV, CFUV, and Dashli viruses within a single species putatively named Sandfly fever Sicilian phlebovirus species [3].
In this study we identified a novel phlebovirus, tentatively named the Drin virus after the eponymous river in the Kukës region of Albania. The virus was identified in a pool containing only male sand flies belonging to the P. neglectus species which is the predominant species in that area. Other studies have demonstrated that phleboviruses were potentially transmitted by several distinct species of sand flies [27]. The second interesting finding is that the pool containing Drin virus RNA consisted exclusively of male sand flies—this has been previously reported in most of the studies on phlebovirus detection in sand flies [19,28,29,30], and is related to trans-ovarial or venereal transmission [31]. Assuming that only one individual was infected in Pool #17, the sand fly infection rate was 0.18% during 2015 and 0.04% if both years are combined. For comparison, infection rates were 0.04% for the Dashli virus in Iran and 0.026% for the Toros virus in Turkey [3,32]. There is no data to allow us to calculate the infection rate for the CFUV virus in Greece [1]. Sand fly trapping sites were scattered to best cover the whole country (Figure 1). As previously reported [32], NGS analysis of PCR products within the COI and Cytb genes of sand flies is an efficient approach for species identification within a pool of insects. Here, all sand flies included in Pool #17 were P. neglectus, suggesting that this species is capable of transmitting the Drin virus between sand flies and possible vertebrate hosts. As P. neglectus is widespread in the Balkan peninsula, in Eastern Europe, and in Turkey [5], and because it was involved in the transmission of the Balkan virus [13] and Toscana virus [33], competence studies are needed to understand better the potential of this species to transmit viruses of medical importance.
Gene by gene comparative distance analysis showed that pairwise distances of the Drin virus versus CFUV and Toros viruses were consistently lower than the lowest distances observed between Drin virus and SFSV–Dashli virus. Detailed genetic distance analyses have been done for the SFSV and CFUV phlebovirus tentative species by Alkan et al. [3].
The limited genetic divergence between partial sequences of the Drin and CFUV viruses questions whether they are two distinct viruses or two strains of the same virus. Since taxonomy does not regulate delineation below the species level, there may be contradictory elements. In favor of considering that the Drin and CFUV viruses are two strains of the same virus—they are genetically very close, and they have been detected in two species of sand flies belonging to the same subgenus (Larroussius). Evidence pointing to the Drin and CFUV viruses as two distinct viruses—they have been discovered in different species of sand flies, they were discovered in different countries, and the Drin virus was found in sand flies trapped in the northern part of Albania which has no contact with Corfou island that faces the Ionian coasts of Albania. It is not known whether cross-neutralization exists for the Drin and CFUV viruses, and the isolation of the Drin virus is required to conduct the proper experiments to address this question.
Therefore, we propose to maintain that the Drin virus and CFUV virus are two distinct representatives and look forward to further studies allowing the isolation of the Drin virus.
Overall, the aforementioned viruses are different members of the same species that remain unrecognized by the ICTV; currently, a proposal has been filled and submitted.
Interestingly, since the CFUV virus discovery 30 years ago, this is the first direct evidence that a virus belonging to the SFSV group is circulating in South East Europe. At the outset of this study, there was indirect evidence (neutralization-based seroprevalence studies) showing that SFSV was circulating in Portugal, but there is not any seroprevalence survey to document this in Albania [8].
As a consequence, there are representatives of the three main species of sand fly-borne phleboviruses in Albania (Balkan, Adria, and Drin viruses) and in the Balkan as well: Toscana and Balkan viruses for the Sandfly fever Naples phlebovirus species, Adria, Zaba and Bregalaka viruses for the Salehabad phlebovirus species, CFUV and Drin viruses for the tentative SFSV phlebovirus species.
SFSV has been described in an extended geographic area from southwestern Europe to the Middle East including northern Africa. SFSV epidemics were recorded in Italy, Cyprus, Turkey, and Ethiopia [23,27]. Furthermore, seroprevalence studies have shown the presence of neutralizing antibodies in humans in France and Cyprus [25,34]. In Iraq, during an outbreak among US Army troops in 2007, IgM antibodies specific for SFSV were detected in convalescent sera [35]. Specific IgG was also detected in Marine soldiers after self-reported febrile illness cases. A variant strain of SFSV was also isolated from human serum during an important outbreak in Ethiopia [26]. Although the pathogenicity of SFSV is not disputed [23,34], so far there are no data to support that the CFUV virus or genetic variants such as the Drin virus can cause disease in humans. The areas of circulation of viruses belonging to the SFSV phlebovirus species are wide enough to justify that efforts must be made to investigate the potential role of these viruses in human infections. Further seroprevalence studies may show indirect evidence of the circulation of the virus in humans. The fact that a single real-time RT–qPCR assay is capable of detecting all viruses that are so far recognized as members of this group is an important asset for studies of clinical cohorts of febrile illness in countries where direct or indirect evidence of the presence of these viruses have been reported.

Author Contributions

S.B., X.d.L., R.N.C and N.A.; methodology, E.V., P.K., M.K., G.M. and A.B.; software, A.B. and N.A; validation, S.B., X.d.L, R.N.C. and N.A.; formal analysis, A.B. and N.A.; investigation, E.V., P.K., M.K., G.M. and A.B.; resources, S.B., E.V., P.K., M.K.,; data curation, S.B., X.d.L, R.N.C. and N.A.; writing—original draft preparation, S.B., A.B., R.N.C and N.A.; writing—review and editing, S.B., E.V. and N.A.; visualization, E.V., A.B. and N.A.; supervision, S.B., X.d.L., R.N.C and N.A.; project administration, S.B., X.d.L., R.N.C. funding acquisition, S.B., X.d.L. and R.N.C.”.

Funding

This work was supported in part by the European Virus Archive goes Global (EVAg) project that has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 653316.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgments to Institute of Public Health of Albania for supporting the preparatory and field work. The authors thank Eng. Migel Ali, GIS expert at the Company Geo Consulting Albania, who helps us to prepare the map specifically for this manuscript. Nazli Ayhan is supported by a post-doctoral fellowship awarded by the Institute of Research for Development (IRD).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Rodhain, F.; Madulo-Leblond, G.; Hannoun, C.; Tesh, R.B. Le virus Corfou. Un nouveau Phlebovirus virus isole de Phlebotomes en Grece. Ann. De L’institut Pasteur/Virol. 1985, 136, 161–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sabin, A.B. Experimental studies on Phlebotomus (pappataci, sandfly) fever during World War II. Arch. Gesamte Virusforsch 1951, 4, 367–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Alkan, C.; Moin, V.V.; Ayhan, N.; Badakhshan, M.; Bichaud, L.; Rahbarian, N.; Javadian, E.A.; Alten, B.; de Lamballerie, X.; Charrel, R.N. Isolation and sequencing of Dashli virus, a novel Sicilian-like virus in sandflies from Iran; genetic and phylogenetic evidence for the creation of one novel species within the Phlebovirus genus in the Bunyaviridae family. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2017, 11, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Elliott, R.M.; Brennan, B. Emerging phleboviruses. Curr. Opin. Virol. 2014, 5, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Killick-Kendrick, R. The biology and control of Phlebotomine sand flies. Clin. Dermatol. 1999, 17, 279–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dionisio, D.; Esperti, F.; Vivarelli, A.; Valassina, M. Epidemiological, clinical and laboratory aspects of sandfly fever. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2003, 16, 383–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Charrel, R.N.; Gallian, P.; Navarro-Marí, J.M.; Nicoletti, L.; Papa, A.; Sánchez-Seco, M.P.; Tenorio, A.; de Lamballerie, X. Emergence of Toscana virus in Europe. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2005, 11, 1657–1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Alwassouf, S.; Maia, C.; Ayhan, N.; Coimbra, M.; Cristovao, J.M.; Richet, H.; Bichaud, L.; Campino, L.; Charrel, R.N. Neutralization-based seroprevalence of toscana virus and sandfly fever sicilian virus in dogs and cats from Portugal. J. Gen. Virol 2016, 97, 2816–2823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Papa, A.; Velo, E.; Bino, S. A novel phlebovirus in Albanian sandflies. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Eur. Soc. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2011, 17, 585–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Anagnostou, V.; Pardalos, G.; Athanasiou-Metaxa, M.; Papa, A. Novel phlebovirus in febrile child, Greece. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2011, 17, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Velo, E.; Paparisto, A.; Bongiorno, G.; Di Muccio, T.; Khoury, C.; Bino, S.; Gramiccia, M.; Gradoni, L.; Maroli, M. Entomological and parasitological study on phlebotomine sandflies in central and northern Albania. Parasite 2005, 12, 45–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Velo, E.; Bongiorno, G.; Kadriaj, P.; Myrseli, T.; Crilly, J.; Lika, A.; Mersini, K.; Di Muccio, T.; Bino, S.; Gramiccia, M.; et al. The current status of phlebotomine sand flies in Albania and incrimination of Phlebotomus neglectus (Diptera, Psychodidae) as the main vector of Leishmania infantum. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0179118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ayhan, N.; Velo, E.; de Lamballerie, X.; Kota, M.; Kadriaj, P.; Ozbel, Y.; Charrel, R.N.; Bino, S. Detection of Leishmania infantum and a Novel Phlebovirus (Balkan Virus) from Sand Flies in Albania. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2016, 16, 802–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ayhan, N.; Baklouti, A.; Prudhomme, J.; Walder, G.; Amaro, F.; Alten, B.; Moutailler, S.; Ergunay, K.; Charrel, R.N.; Huemer, H. Practical Guidelines for Studies on Sandfly-Borne Phleboviruses: Part I: Important Points to Consider Ante Field Work. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2017, 17, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Huemer, H.; Prudhomme, J.; Amaro, F.; Baklouti, A.; Walder, G.; Alten, B.; Moutailler, S.; Ergunay, K.; Charrel, R.N.; Ayhan, N. Practical Guidelines for Studies on Sandfly-Borne Phleboviruses: Part II: Important Points to Consider for Fieldwork and Subsequent Virological Screening. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2017, 17, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sánchez-Seco, M.P.; Echevarría, J.M.; Hernández, L.; Estévez, D.; Navarro-Marí, J.M.; Tenorio, A. Detection and identification of Toscana and other phleboviruses by RT-nested-PCR assays with degenerated primers. J. Med. Virol. 2003, 71, 140–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Lambert, A.J.; Lanciotti, R.S. Consensus amplification and novel multiplex sequencing method for S segment species identification of 47 viruses of the Orthobunyavirus, Phlebovirus, and Nairovirus genera of the family Bunyaviridae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2009, 47, 2398–2404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Weidmann, M.; Sanchez-Seco, M.P.; Sall, A.A.; Ly, P.O.; Thiongane, Y.; Lô, M.M.; Schley, H.; Hufert, F.T. Rapid detection of important human pathogenic Phleboviruses. J. Clin. Virol. 2008, 41, 138–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Alkan, C.; Alwassouf, S.; Piorkowski, G.; Bichaud, L.; Tezcan, S.; Dincer, E.; Ergunay, K.; Ozbel, Y.; Alten, B.; de Lamballerie, X.; et al. Isolation, Genetic Characterization, and Seroprevalence of Adana Virus, a Novel Phlebovirus Belonging to the Salehabad Virus Complex, in Turkey. J. Virol. 2015, 89, 4080–4091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Peterson, D.; Filipski, A.; Kumar, S. MEGA6: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 2725–2729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Folmer, O.; Black, M.; Hoeh, W.; Lutz, R.; Vrijenhoek, R. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotechnol. 1994, 3, 294–299. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Esseghir, S.; Ready, P.D.; Ben-Ismail, R. Speciation of Phlebotomus sandflies of the subgenus Larroussius coincided with the late Miocene–Pliocene aridification of the Mediterranean subregion. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. 2000, 70, 189–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Çarhan, A.; Uyar, Y.; Özkaya, E.; Ertek, M.; Dobler, G.; Dilcher, M.; Wang, Y.; Spiegel, M.; Hufert, F.; Weidmann, M. Characterization of a sandfly fever Sicilian virus isolated during a sandfly fever epidemic in Turkey. J. Clin. Virol. 2010, 48, 264–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Castro, A.; Tempera, G.; Guglielmino, S. Incidence of arbovirus antibodies in bovine, ovine and human sera collected in Eastern Sicily. Acta. Virol. 1976, 20, 76–79. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  25. Eitrem, R.; Stylianou, M.; Niklasson, B. High prevalence rates of antibody to three sandfly fever viruses (Sicilian, Naples and Toscana) among Cypriots. Epidemiol. Infect.. 1991, 107, 685–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Woyessa, A.B.; Omballa, V.; Wang, D.; Lambert, A.; Waiboci, L.; Ayele, W.; Ahmed, A.; Abera, N.A.; Cao, S.; Ochieng, M.; et al. An outbreak of acute febrile illness caused by Sandfly Fever Sicilian Virus in the Afar region of Ethiopia, 2011. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2014, 91, 1250–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ayhan, N.; Charrel, R.N. Of phlebotomines (sandflies) and viruses: a comprehensive perspective on a complex situation. Curr. Opin. Insect. Sci. 2017, 22, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Peyrefitte, C.N.; Grandadam, M.; Bessaud, M.; Andry, P.E.; Fouque, F.; Caro, V.; Diancourt, L.; Schuffenecker, I.; Pagès, F.; Tolou, H.; et al. Diversity of Phlebotomus perniciosus in Provence, southeastern France: Detection of two putative new phlebovirus sequences. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Dis. 2013, 13, 630–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Remoli, M.E.; Fortuna, C.; Marchi, A.; Bucci, P.; Argentini, C.; Bongiorno, G.; Maroli, M.; Gradoni, L.; Gramiccia, M.; Ciufolini, M.G. Viral isolates of a novel putative phlebovirus in the Marche Region of Italy. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2014, 90, 760–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Zhioua, E.; Moureau, G.; Chelbi, I.; Ninove, L.; Bichaud, L.; Derbali, M.; Champs, M.; Cherni, S.; Salez, N.; Cook, S.; et al. Punique virus, a novel phlebovirus, related to sandfly fever Naples virus, isolated from sandflies collected in Tunisia. J. Gen. Virol. 2010, 91, 1275–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tesh, R.B. The genus Phlebovirus and its vectors. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1988, 33, 169–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Alkan, C.; Erisoz, K.O.; Alten, B.; de Lamballerie, X.; Charrel, R.N. Sandfly-Borne Phlebovirus Isolations from Turkey: New Insight into the Sandfly fever Sicilian and Sandfly fever Naples Species. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2016, 10, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ayhan, N.; Alten, B.; Ivovic, V.; Martinkovic, F.; Kasap, O.E.; Ozbel, Y.; de Lamballerie, X.; Charrel, R.N. Cocirculation of two Lineages of toscana Virus in Croatia. Front. Public Health 2017, 5, 336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bichaud, L.; Piarroux, R.P.; Izri, A.; Ninove, L.; Mary, C.; de Lamballerie, X.; Charrel, R.N. Low seroprevalence of sandfly fever Sicilian virus antibodies in humans, Marseille, France. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2011, 17, 1189–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Riddle, M.S.; Althoff, J.M.; Earhart, K.; Monteville, M.R.; Yingst, S.L.; Mohareb, E.W.; Putnam, S.D.; Sanders, J.W. Serological evidence of arboviral infection and self-reported febrile illness among US troops deployed to Al Asad, Iraq. Epidemiol. Infect. 2008, 136, 665–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Sand fly sampling regions and phlebovirus positive pool location.
Figure 1. Sand fly sampling regions and phlebovirus positive pool location.
Viruses 11 00469 g001
Figure 2. Schematic representation of specifically designed primers.
Figure 2. Schematic representation of specifically designed primers.
Viruses 11 00469 g002
Figure 3. Phylogenetic analysis of the phlebovirus amino acid sequence. Neighbor-joining (NJ) phylogeny trees were generated using the Kimura 2-parameter model with 1000 bootstrap replication. (A) L protein amino acid sequence (167 AA). (B) Gc protein amino acid sequence (170 AA). (C) Nucleoprotein amino acid sequence (170 AA). GenBank accession numbers are inserted in the taxon’s nomination.
Figure 3. Phylogenetic analysis of the phlebovirus amino acid sequence. Neighbor-joining (NJ) phylogeny trees were generated using the Kimura 2-parameter model with 1000 bootstrap replication. (A) L protein amino acid sequence (167 AA). (B) Gc protein amino acid sequence (170 AA). (C) Nucleoprotein amino acid sequence (170 AA). GenBank accession numbers are inserted in the taxon’s nomination.
Viruses 11 00469 g003aViruses 11 00469 g003bViruses 11 00469 g003c
Table 1. Corfou (CFUV) virus specific primers.
Table 1. Corfou (CFUV) virus specific primers.
Target Assay Name Sequence (5′–3′)Amplicon Size (bp)
L segment (RdRp gene)real-time RT-qPCRL-Corfou-Albania—ForwardAGCCACATAAGATGTGCAAG168
L-Corfou-Albania—Reverse CCTGTGAAGGGATTGAACAT
M segment (Gc gene)RT-PCRGc—ForwardGAAGGACAACTGCTTAGCATG718
Gc—ReverseCATTACAGGAATAACAGCCTG
Nested PCRGc-Nested—ForwardATGCGGATGCTTCAATGTT428
Gc-Nested—ReverseCATTCTATGATGTCAGTCAT
real-time RT-qPCRGc-RealTime—ForwardTTAGGTCTTCATCTGGAGC149
Gc-RealTime—ReverseCATTCTATGATGTCAGTCAT
S segment (N gene)RT-PCRN—ForwardTAGATGAGACCGTGGTCCA514
N—ReverseGTTGATGGCGGCAGACAT
Nested PCRN-Nested—ForwardATGCCAAGAAGATGATTATTC352
N-Nested—ReverseGTGAGCATCAACAATGGCAT
real-time RT-qPCRN-RealTime—ForwardATGGATAGAATCAGTGGTCAG109
N-RealTime—ReverseGCTCCTCTGAGTCCAACAT
Back to TopTop