Next Article in Journal
Comparative Pathogenesis of Asian and African-Lineage Zika Virus in Indian Rhesus Macaque’s and Development of a Non-Human Primate Model Suitable for the Evaluation of New Drugs and Vaccines
Next Article in Special Issue
In Vitro Studies of Lipopolysaccharide-Mediated DNA Release of Podovirus HK620
Previous Article in Journal
Epigenetic Modulation of CD8+ T Cell Function in Lentivirus Infections: A Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Sequence of Two Bacteriophages with Hypermodified Bases Reveals Novel Phage-Host Interactions
Open AccessArticle

Molecular Mechanisms Governing “Hair-Trigger” Induction of Shiga Toxin-Encoding Prophages

1
Department of Biological Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA
2
Department of Biology, Mercyhurst University, Erie, PA 16546, USA
3
Department of Biology, Gannon University, Erie, PA 16541, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2018, 10(5), 228; https://doi.org/10.3390/v10050228
Received: 16 March 2018 / Revised: 25 April 2018 / Accepted: 25 April 2018 / Published: 29 April 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Phage-Host Interactions)
Shiga toxin (Stx)-encoding E. coli (STEC) strains are responsible for sporadic outbreaks of food poisoning dating to 1982, when the first STEC strain, E. coli O157:H7, was isolated. Regardless of STEC serotype, the primary symptoms of STEC infections are caused by Stx that is synthesized from genes resident on lambdoid prophage present in STEC. Despite similar etiology, the severity of STEC-mediated disease varies by outbreak. However, it is unclear what modulates the severity of STEC-mediated disease. Stx production and release is controlled by lytic growth of the Stx-encoding bacteriophage, which in turn, is controlled by the phage repressor. Here, we confirm our earlier suggestion that the higher spontaneous induction frequency of Stx-encoding prophage is a consequence, in part, of lower intracellular repressor levels in STEC strains versus non-STEC strains. We also show that this lowered intracellular repressor concentration is a consequence of the utilization of alternative binding/regulatory strategies by the phage repressor. We suggest that a higher spontaneous induction frequency would lead to increased virulence. View Full-Text
Keywords: bacteriophage; Shiga toxin; DNA binding; transcription bacteriophage; Shiga toxin; DNA binding; transcription
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Chakraborty, D.; Clark, E.; Mauro, S.A.; Koudelka, G.B. Molecular Mechanisms Governing “Hair-Trigger” Induction of Shiga Toxin-Encoding Prophages. Viruses 2018, 10, 228. https://doi.org/10.3390/v10050228

AMA Style

Chakraborty D, Clark E, Mauro SA, Koudelka GB. Molecular Mechanisms Governing “Hair-Trigger” Induction of Shiga Toxin-Encoding Prophages. Viruses. 2018; 10(5):228. https://doi.org/10.3390/v10050228

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chakraborty, Dolonchapa; Clark, Eric; Mauro, Steven A.; Koudelka, Gerald B. 2018. "Molecular Mechanisms Governing “Hair-Trigger” Induction of Shiga Toxin-Encoding Prophages" Viruses 10, no. 5: 228. https://doi.org/10.3390/v10050228

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop