Next Article in Journal
Spore Dispersal Patterns of Fusarium circinatum on an Infested Monterey Pine Forest in North-Western Spain
Next Article in Special Issue
Incidence of Trailer Frame Structure on Driver’s Safety during Log Transportation
Previous Article in Journal
Assessment of Flammability of Moroccan Forest Fuels: New Approach to Estimate the Flammability Index
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Optimum Slash Pile Size for Grinding Operations: Grapple Excavator and Horizontal Grinder Operations Model Based on a Sierra Nevada, California Survey
Article

Occupational Safety and Health Concerns in Logging: A Cross-Sectional Assessment in Virginia

1
Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
2
School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA
3
Department of Forest Resources & Environmental Conservation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
4
Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2017, 8(11), 440; https://doi.org/10.3390/f8110440
Received: 29 September 2017 / Revised: 9 November 2017 / Accepted: 13 November 2017 / Published: 15 November 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Forest Operations, Engineering and Management)
Increased logging mechanization has helped improve logging safety and health, yet related safety risks and concerns are not well understood. A cross-sectional study was completed among Virginia loggers. Participants (n = 122) completed a self-administered questionnaire focusing on aspects of safety and health related to logging equipment. Respondents were at a high risk of workplace injuries, with reported career and 12-month injury prevalences of 51% and 14%, respectively. Further, nearly all (98%) respondents reported experiencing musculoskeletal symptoms. Over half (57.4%) of respondents reported symptoms related to diesel exhaust exposure in their career. Few (15.6%), however, perceived their jobs to be dangerous. Based on the opinions and suggestions of respondents, three priority areas were identified for interventions: struck-by/against hazards, situational awareness (SA) during logging operations, and visibility hazards. To address these hazards, and to have a broader and more substantial positive impact on safety and health, we discuss the need for proactive approaches such as incorporating proximity technologies in a logging machine or personal equipment, and enhancing logging machine design to enhance safety, ergonomics, and SA. View Full-Text
Keywords: workplace injuries; musculoskeletal disorders; diesel exhaust exposure; mechanized logging; situational awareness workplace injuries; musculoskeletal disorders; diesel exhaust exposure; mechanized logging; situational awareness
MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, S.; Nussbaum, M.A.; Schoenfisch, A.L.; Barrett, S.M.; Bolding, M.C.; Dickerson, D.E. Occupational Safety and Health Concerns in Logging: A Cross-Sectional Assessment in Virginia. Forests 2017, 8, 440. https://doi.org/10.3390/f8110440

AMA Style

Kim S, Nussbaum MA, Schoenfisch AL, Barrett SM, Bolding MC, Dickerson DE. Occupational Safety and Health Concerns in Logging: A Cross-Sectional Assessment in Virginia. Forests. 2017; 8(11):440. https://doi.org/10.3390/f8110440

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Sunwook, Maury A. Nussbaum, Ashley L. Schoenfisch, Scott M. Barrett, Michael C. Bolding, and Deborah E. Dickerson 2017. "Occupational Safety and Health Concerns in Logging: A Cross-Sectional Assessment in Virginia" Forests 8, no. 11: 440. https://doi.org/10.3390/f8110440

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop