Next Article in Journal
Spatial Diagnosis of Climatic and Landscape Controls on Forest Leaf Area Index Across China Using Interpretable Machine Learning
Previous Article in Journal
Topographic Modulation of Vegetation Vigor and Moisture Condition in Mediterranean Ravine Ecosystems of Central Chile
Previous Article in Special Issue
Proposing Green Growth Indicators for Enterprises in the Woodworking and Furniture Industry
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Demand and Net Import Modeling and Forecasting for Wood Products in a Country with Limited Forest Resources (Tunisia)

1
National Institute of Research in Rural Engineering, Water and Forests (INRGREF), University of Carthage, Ariana 2080, Tunisia
2
Higher School of Agriculture of Mograne (ESAM), University of Carthage, Zaghouan 1121, Tunisia
3
Faculty of Economics Sciences and Management of Tunis, University of Tunis el Manar, Tunis 1068, Tunisia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2026, 17(2), 202; https://doi.org/10.3390/f17020202
Submission received: 26 November 2025 / Revised: 10 January 2026 / Accepted: 12 January 2026 / Published: 2 February 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Economics and Management of Forest Resources and Products)

Abstract

This paper analyzes long-term trends in the apparent consumption and external deficit of wood and wood-derived products in Tunisia using annual data covering the period of 1975–2024. Tunisia’s limited forest resources and increasing domestic demand have generated a structural dependence on imports, reflected in a persistent and widening trade imbalance. To investigate the determinants of this situation, ten econometric log–log models were estimated for the major product categories, including sawnwood, panels, veneers and plywood, newsprint, printing paper, and wrapping paper. The models assess how apparent consumption and external deficits could be explained through changes in income levels (GDP per capita), prices, technological progress, and labor costs. Income elasticity is found to be the primary driver of demand, while price effects remain relatively weak across most categories. Based on the estimated elasticities, demand projections were developed up to 2050 under three alternative income growth scenarios: a trend scenario (1.2% annual growth), a pessimistic scenario (0.6%), and an optimistic scenario (2%). Under the trend scenario, total demand for wood and wood-derived products is projected to increase by about 52% by 2050, leading to a further widening of the gap between domestic supply and demand, with higher growth rates under the optimistic scenario and more moderate increases under the pessimistic one. These findings highlight the challenges Tunisia faces in managing the increasing pressure on its forest resources and underscore the need for strategic planning to ensure the long-term sustainability of the wood and wood-derived industries.

1. Introduction

Tunisia is a forest-poor country, similar to other nations with low forest cover (less than 10% of their total land area). According to the FAO Global Forest Resources Assessment, approximately 49 countries worldwide fall into this category [1]. These countries are mainly located in extreme arid, arid, and semi-arid regions, including the Middle East (Qatar, Kuwait, Oman, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Jordan, and the United Arab Emirates), North Africa (Algeria, Egypt, Libya, and Mauritania), and Central Asia (Kazakhstan, Afghanistan, and Pakistan), as well as several African countries such as Djibouti, Niger, Kenya, and Namibia.
Although wood product consumption varies by income level, imports in forest-poor countries may consist either of raw wood used by furniture and woodworking industries or of finished products with higher value added. Moreover, while some countries experience a trade deficit in raw wood, they may record a surplus in finished wood products by focusing on labor-intensive processing and design activities along the value chain, as is the case for Tunisia.
International trade theory explains foreign trade flows by emphasizing differences in production costs across countries. According to Heckscher and Ohlin, these differences arise from variations in factor endowments. Countries tend to enjoy comparative advantages in the production of goods that make intensive use of the factors with which they are most richly endowed. On the fringes of this theory, Linder developed the idea in 1961 that trade in primary products is well explained by the law of factor proportions, but that trade in manufactured goods does not depend on relative natural endowments. Later, several economists explained comparative advantage not only by factor endowments [2], but also by technological development [3].
Several empirical applications of the Heckscher–Ohlin theory were developed for wood products and wood derivatives between 1990 and 2010. Studies by Bonnefoi and Buongiorno, Prestemon and Buongiorno, and Lundmark show that the theory has mainly been confirmed for primary and intermediate products, but not for finished products [4,5,6]. While abundant forest resources (in countries like France) are a favorable factor, limited resource availability (as in Italy and China) is not necessarily a limiting factor in explaining a country’s net exports and causing trade deficits [7]. The literature also highlights the fact that an increase in wood demand often relies on imported wood, even in countries with substantial forest resources, as was demonstrated for France [7] and the United Kingdom [8]. Several studies further emphasize the importance of other determinants, particularly technological development, in explaining the net exports of forest products [9]. The main implication is that reducing the wood trade deficit is more strongly influenced by technological progress and the competitiveness of wood-processing industries than by expanding domestic wood production or harvesting.
Compared to primary forest products, trade in processed wood forest products is larger, more complex in structure, and more closely linked [10]. Trade in secondary processed products is integrated into product groups. Wood and wood-derived products in Tunisia are facing a critical situation and major challenges regarding supply, demand, and international trade. The country has limited forest resources, with forest surface area covering around 700,000 ha and consisting mainly of Aleppo pine and Oak [11]. These forests are characterized by slow growth and limited extraction levels, making their ability to meet national demand complicated [12]. This situation has led to an extreme dependence on imports to meet raw material needs (90% of raw materials are imported). Also, an increasing demand is notable when examining the apparent consumption of wood and wood-derived products, which grew from from 190,000 m3 in 1961 to 1.3 million m3 in 2012 [12].
The fact that the demand for wood and wood-derived products, such as sawnwood, panels, veneers, plywood, and different categories of paper and paperboard, has increased simultaneously with the standard of income and population growth [13,14] has led to an international trade disequilibrium. This fact can be explained by the observed deficit resulting from the steadily rising net imports of wood and wood-derived products.
The lack of availability of raw materials related to natural resources and the opening up of the Tunisian market to the European market based on the free trade agreement with the European Union in 1996 have led to a disequilibrium. This situation has become worse, considering the fact that the international market favors imports when local production is not competitive enough to face international competition. Also, the external deficit depends on international markets’ fluctuations in terms of the prices and availability of imported wood [15], which are highly sensitive to crises (the war in Ukraine, post-COVID logistical disruptions).
Tracing the literature, demand models for wood and wood-derived products were first developed in the 1960s [4]. Several types of models have been developed to better understand trends in the international market and the industrial sector. The aggregate demand model is based on the relationship between the total demand for wood and wood-derived products and macroeconomic variables such as income, prices, etc. The sectoral demand model segments demand according to different products (sawnwood, panels, plywood, paper, etc.) to analyze the specific characteristics of each branch [13,16]. These models often use historical data to forecast future demand based on past trends and explanatory variables. They make it possible to analyze how demand responds to changes in income and prices, often using elasticity calculations.
For Tunisia, models of demand for wood and wood-derived products were developed in 1990, 1998, and 2007 to predict future trends. In the 90s, the first publication by Daly-Hassen used variables related to the standards of income, population, construction, and education to explain the consumption and imports of wood and wood products, paper, and paperboard, using a time series from 1970 to 1988. A good correlation between the variables was obtained, which made it possible to make projections for the period of 1990–2010. Also, power functions and linear models of apparent consumption were developed for six main wood products (sawnwood, fiberboard, particle board, veneer sheets and plywood, newsprint, printing and writing paper, wrapping and packaging paper, and paperboard) based on income, import prices, and substitute product prices, using time series data from 1970 to 1995 [17]. These showed that consumption of wood and wood products is highly elastic in relation to income, with elasticities higher than 1 for sawnwood and veneers, but low elasticity in relation to price. These models were used to make demand forecasts up to 2015, applying assumptions to explanatory variable changes (income, population, and prices). The application of these assumptions predicted an estimated global demand for wood and wood products of 2.222 million m3 roundwood equivalents (RWE) in 2015, which, compared to the real apparent consumption of 2015 (2.370 million m3 RWE), shows a variation of 6.7% that can mainly be attributed to model errors and assumptions about changes in independent variables.
In a recent publication, demand models were created for the same products using the same variables (standard of income, import prices, substitution prices), applying a logarithmic function with a longer time series: 1975–2005 [14]. Modeling the apparent consumption per capita showed a good correlation, with high elasticity in relation to the standard of income. Demand forecasts for 2030 were put forward based on assumptions on annual growth in the standard income, import prices, substitution prices, and population growth trends.
Models of the trade of wood and wood products often focus on analyzing trade flows, international market dynamics, and factors affecting trade [17,18,19]. These models allow the dynamics between imports and exports to be studied and improve the understanding of factors that influence the trade deficit in this sector. These dynamic trade balance models represent the evolution of the deficit over a given period by integrating macroeconomic variables, international prices, and trade policies. They are econometric time series models that analyze past trends in the deficit, using historical data to predict its future trajectory based on explanatory variables such as commodity prices, economic growth, or tariff policies. They also make it possible to isolate the impact of different factors (level of consumption, local supply capacity, tariff policy) on the evolution of the deficit. These models are valuable to decision-makers for anticipating potential disequilibria, guiding trade policy, and planning adaptive strategies in terms of diversification or optimization, either from the production side or the commercialization side.
This paper aims to analyze actual changes in the consumption of wood and wood products over a long period, from 1975 to 2024, and then to develop models of consumption and trade deficits for wood and wood-derived products. Finally, it compares the models developed with existing ones in order to understand the dynamics of demand, forecast for 2050, and assess Tunisia’s dependence on imports.
The primary objective of this paper is to analyze the long-term dynamics of wood and wood-derived product demand in a country with limited forest resources. To address this objective, the study examines how changes in demand translate into increasing import dependence and trade deficits under domestic supply constraints. The analysis also discusses the implications of these demand trends for forest resource use and industrial development. Together, these dimensions provide an integrated framework for understanding demand-driven trade imbalances in forest-poor countries.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Collection

Data on production were collected from the Forestry administration and the FAO databases. Data on the imports and exports of various products were collected from the National Institute of Statistics (INS) and the FAO databases [20,21,22]. The available data cover the period of 1975–2024, i.e., 49 years. The following analysis focused on the modeling of the apparent consumption and deficit of wood and wood-derived products. Products treated in this paper are classified according to the main branches of the wood industry, as mentioned in Figure 1. In the following analysis, two main groups of products are considered. The first group, “Wood and articles of wood,” includes fiber and particle board, veneers and plywood, and sawn timber. This group also includes other items such as wooden structures and furniture, which, however, are not treated separately in this paper. The second group, “Paper and paperboard,” includes newsprint, printing and writing paper, wrapping paper, and paperboard. Similarly, this group also covers other products such as paper pulp and other paper and paperboard items, which are not analyzed individually in this study.

2.2. Definition of Wood and Wood-Derived Product Consumption and Deficit

In order to analyze long-term trends in wood and wood-derived product consumption, demand dynamics were modeled using time-series data. As wood and wood-derived products are largely considered to be capital goods that stems for final products, derived demand theory provides the most appropriate framework for analyzing their demand. Based on the fact that the demand for a product is negatively related to its own price and positively related to the demand for the final goods that use it, as well as being affected by the prices of other inputs, including substitutes and complements, the derived demand for the product can be expressed as a function of final demand factors such as consumer income and the prices of substitute products [13]. Factors that may influence wood and wood-derived products include the state of internal resources and technological developments. Technological progress can help reduce wood consumption. However, the proportion of raw wood processed and used for the manufacturing of finished products may increase. The increased use of panels (particleboard and fiberboard) in the manufacturing of finished products is a sign of technological progress. Similarly, the use of waste paper and paperboard in the paper industry helps to limit the consumption of wood and wood products [19].
Consumption is estimated based on its apparent consumption “Ca” which corresponds to the sum of production and net imports (imports minus exports). The apparent consumption presented in detail for the six specific product categories and aggregated into two main product groups, as shown in Figure 1, is expressed as follows:
Cai = Sum (Pij ∗ ccj) + Sum(Mij ∗ ccj) − Sum(Xij ∗ ccj)
where
Cai: Apparent consumption in year i
Pij: Production of a considered product j in year i
Mij: Import of a considered product j in year i
Xij: Export of a considered product j in year i
ccj: conversion coefficient of a considered product j into roundwood equivalents (RWE)
Apparent consumption per capita, considered as a dependent variable, is then obtained by dividing by the population of the year i:
CaPDhi = CaBPDhi/Popi
CaPDhi: Consumption of forest product per capita in year i
Popi: Population of year i
The deficit value is calculated from the net imports of wood and wood-derived products as follows:
DWPi = Sum(Mij ∗ ccj) − Sum(Xij ∗ ccj)
where
Mij: Import of a considered product j in year i
Xij: Export of a considered product j in year i
ccj: Conversion coefficient of a considered product j into raw wood volume
Given that different wood products are expressed in m3, conversion coefficients are used to obtain a single unit: the m3 roundwood equivalents (Table 1).

2.3. Definition of Foreign Dependency

The foreign dependency coefficient measures the extent to which net imports are used to meet domestic demand for a given product. It is calculated as follows:
FDCoeff i = (Mi − Xi)/Cai
where
Cai: Apparent consumption for year i
Mi: Imports for year i
Xij: Exports for year i
The dependency coefficient was calculated for wood and wood-derived products and the two major groups: wood and wood articles, and paper and paperboard.
The price of the product includes, in addition to the import price, the trade tariffs that were applied to sawn products (until 2000) and panels (until 2007). A gradual decrease in tariffs was implemented following the agreement to create a free trade area between Tunisia and the European Union in 1996, based on the Official Journal of 1998. The duty trade tariff applied at that time was 43%. For sawn timber, a gradual reduction was applied from 1996 to 2000, while for panels, the reduction was applied from 2000 to 2007.

2.4. Model Specification

Based on the previously defined wood and wood-derived product consumption and deficit, the apparent consumption per capita is considered the dependent variable in the present model. Independent variables include the following indicators: demand (income), supply (raw materials for the wood industry and paper industry), prices (for considered products and substitutes), and technological progress (for the wood industry and paper industry). All dependent and independent variables used in the econometric analysis are defined, with their indicators, symbols, and units summarized in Table 2.
Statistical analysis was conducted to identify the main determinants of the apparent consumption of wood and wood-derived products in Tunisia and to measure elasticities. Statistical processing was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics software (version 27), chosen for its reliability in time series econometric analyses. Analysis included Logarithmic transformation: variables were converted to a Neperian logarithm (Ln-Ln) function in SPSS, which was adapted for economic log transformations.
A multiple linear regression analysis was conducted using the SPSS software in order to model the relationship between the apparent consumption of wood and wood-derived products and its main explanatory variables (Table 2). The explanatory variables were selected from a broader initial set in order to optimize model performance, while remaining consistent with the theoretical framework presented in the introduction, particularly with respect to income effects, price dynamics, substitution mechanisms, and technological progress. The log–log specification allowed the estimated coefficients to be directly interpreted as elasticities, indicating the percentage change in the consumption of each of the studied products associated with a 1% change in each explanatory variable. The regression was performed using the Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) method, and standard diagnostic tests were applied to verify the assumptions of linearity, normality, and homoscedasticity of residuals.
The logarithmic models for the apparent consumption and deficit of the different considered wood and wood-derived products are specified as follows:
l n   C A j = α 1 l n   V 1 j + α 2 l n   V 2 j + + α n l n   V n j + μ j
l n   D j = α 1 l n   V 1 j + α 2 l n   V 2 j + + α m l n   V m j + ε j
where
C A j : Apparent consumption for product j
D j : Deficit for product j
α 1 to α n , α 1 to α m : Parameters to be estimated
V 1 j to V n j : Independent variables (Table 2)
μ j , ε j : Residual errors
The econometric approach adopted in this study focuses on identifying long-run structural relationships between wood product consumption, income, prices, and technological variables. Log–log OLS specifications are widely used in forest product demand studies when the primary objective is to estimate long-term elasticities rather than short-term adjustment dynamics. Given the length and continuity of the time series (1975–2024), the estimated coefficients are interpreted as average long-run associations. While more advanced time-series techniques, such as cointegration or error-correction models, could be used to analyze short-run dynamics, these extensions fall outside the scope of the present study and are identified as directions for future research.
Model performance is assessed using standard goodness-of-fit indicators (R2, adjusted R2, F-statistics). In addition, a set of diagnostic tests is conducted to examine key assumptions of the OLS framework, including multicollinearity, heteroskedasticity, and residual autocorrelation using STATA (version 19).

2.5. Future Forecasting

For future forecasting, projections were carried out for all of the studied dependent variables included in the econometric model. The projection framework is based on a combination of scenario analysis for income growth and assumption-driven extrapolation for the remaining explanatory variables. Income growth constitutes the central driver of the projection scenarios. A baseline scenario based on the historical trend over the study period was first considered, assuming an average annual growth in GDP of 1.2% per capita. This annual growth follows the trend in Tunisia’s GDP and was calculated based on the past evolution of the Tunisian GDP per capita [21]. To account for the uncertainty surrounding future economic conditions, two alternative scenarios were defined: a pessimistic scenario assuming 0.6% annual growth (representing a 50% reduction from the historical trend) and an optimistic scenario assuming 2% annual growth [27].
Price variables were extrapolated using their historical trends, under the assumption of continuity in relative price dynamics over the projection horizon. Structural and technological variables were projected based on fixed annual growth assumptions consistent with their long-term observed evolution. In particular, the share of panel consumption was assumed to increase at an average annual rate of 0.8%, capturing gradual substitution effects between panels and sawnwood within the wood products sector. Population projections are based on United Nations demographic forecasts. Lagged consumption variables are generated endogenously within the projection process.

3. Results

3.1. Wood and Wood-Derived Product Consumption and Deficit Evolution

Diagnostic tests were conducted to assess multicollinearity using the Variance Inflation Factor (VIF), heteroskedasticity using the Breusch–Pagan test, and residual autocorrelation using Durbin’s alternative test. The results of these diagnostic tests are reported in Appendix A (Table A1). In general, the results are robust across the models. Multicollinearity remains within acceptable econometric standards, with mean VIF values below commonly used thresholds (VIF < 10). Heteroskedasticity and residual autocorrelation, evaluated at the 5% significance level, appear in some consumption series but remain limited in scope and sector-specific, with no evidence of widespread or systematic misspecification.
More specifically, deficit-related variables for both product groups—wood and wood articles and paper and paperboard—exhibit stable statistical behavior, with no significant diagnostic issues detected. Consumption series display more heterogeneous dynamics across sectors: paper and paperboard consumption shows localized deviations reflecting structural demand changes, while wood and wood article consumption exhibits stronger dynamic adjustments, consistent with industrial inertia. Overall, these findings confirm that the data and model specifications are sufficiently robust and coherent to support the empirical analysis.
When considering the two major wood products “wood and wood articles” and “paper and paper board”, we notice a continuously increasing demand until 2015, followed by a decline (Figure 2).
Looking further, the consumption of sawnwood and veneers has fallen sharply since 2005, while demand for panels (fiber and particle board), especially fiberboard, has risen significantly. The consumption of newsprint and printing paper has declined since 2015, particularly as a result of the spread of electronic information and communication. It should also be noted that income (GDP per capita) increased by only 0.2% per year during the period of 2012–2024, compared to an annual growth of 2.8% during the period of 1990–2012. This resulted in a 12% decline in demand for wood and wood-derived products during the period of 2015 to 2024 (Table 3).
The external deficit rose steadily until 2017, after which sharp fluctuations were observed, linked to both price and volume variations in imports. The external deficit in wood and wood-derived products was 1198.2 million Tunisian dinars (TND) in 2024, representing 6.32% of the trade balance deficit in 2024, including 467.5 million TND for wood and wood articles, and 730.7 million TND for paper and paperboard (Figure 3).

3.2. Foreign Dependency

Consumption of wood and wood-derived products has always been dependent on imports; in fact, the harvesting of wood for industrial use and the production of primary processing products (sawnwood, panels,…) have not kept pace with demand. This has resulted in a dependency coefficient of between 84% and 90% over the last thirty years (Figure 4).

3.3. Model Findings

In total, ten econometric regressions were estimated, covering both apparent consumption and the external deficit for the major categories of wood and wood-derived products in Tunisia. Eight models examined the determinants of apparent consumption per capita for the two main product groups—wood and wood articles (Cabob) and paper and paperboard (Capc)—as well as their respective subcomponents: Sawn Timber (CaS), Panels (Particleboard and Fiberboard) (CApa), Veneers and Plywood (CApl), Newsprint (CAJ), Printing Paper (CAI), and Wrapping and Paperboard (CApce).
Table 4 shows that across all the models, the F-statistics are statistically significant at the 1% level, indicating that the explanatory variables jointly account for a substantial share of the variation in the dependent variables. The coefficients of determination (R2) range from 0.63 to 0.98, reflecting a high explanatory power. The fact that adjusted R2 values remain close to the R2 coefficients suggests that the models are not overparameterized.
The fact that estimations rely on log–log functional forms means that all coefficients represent elasticities. Looking into the details, we notice that income is the main driver of consumption. The coefficients of LN_Y are positive, range from 0.348 to 0.860, and are mostly highly significant (p < 0.01). This means that a 1% increase in income raises consumption per capita by approximately 0.35% to 0.86%, confirming that wood and wood-derived products are normal goods. Prices generally have a negative effect on apparent consumption (sawnwood, vinyl, and plywood). A positive coefficient suggests substitution effects between product categories. The lagged consumption coefficients (LN_Caj−1) are positive and highly significant in most models. This shows that consumption habits or stock effects strongly influence current consumption, particularly for products like newsprint (CAJ) and panels (CApa).
Looking at the deficit regressions in the two main groups, these being wood and wood articles (BOB) and paper and paperboard (BFP), in Tunisia, the net import values of these products are strongly influenced by income, labor costs, and raw material availability. The fact that income has a strong positive effect on the deficits reflects that higher income drives demand faster than domestic supply can meet. Labor cost has a positive effect on the wood and wood articles deficit, increasing the deficit by 1.27% per 1% increase, indicating that higher labor costs constrain domestic production, widening the supply–demand gap. In contrast, greater availability of raw materials (Ln_Propc) reduces the deficit by 0.88% per 1% increase, highlighting the mitigating effect of raw material access on the deficit.

3.4. Forecasting Results

Baseline projections are first presented under the trend scenario, which serves as the common reference framework by combining historical consumption patterns with long-term forecasts to 2050. Under the trend scenario, the 2050 forecasting implies moderate to strong annual growth across all wood product categories. For the category of wood and wood articles (Figure 5), consumption increases at roughly 1.62% per year. Looking in more detail, a heterogeneous pattern is observed among the different wood types. Panels exhibit the highest expansion rate at nearly 3% per year, followed by sawnwood with about a 2.4% annual growth, while veneers show a more modest rise of approximately 0.3% per year.
Paper and paperboard see strong growth under the trend forecast, with an annual growth of 1.7% per year (Figure 6), showing a continued expansion in most paper categories. Printing paper and wrapping paper show a slightly higher annual growth, at 1.96% and 1.5%, respectively, in sharp contrast with newsprint, which experiences a drastic decline at −14.2% per year.
The comparison of GDP per capita growth scenarios shows clear differences in the projected consumption growth rates across product categories, except for veneer and newsprint, which display limited variation across scenarios. Average annual growth rates are computed over the 2024–2050 period.
At the aggregate level, wood and wood articles consumption increases from 1.26% annually under the pessimistic scenario to 1.64% under the trend scenario and 2.15% under the optimistic scenario. Among wood products, panels exhibit the highest growth rates, rising from 2.0% per year in the pessimistic case to 3.0% under the trend scenario and reaching 4.30% per year under the optimistic scenario. Sawnwood shows lower but still increasing growth rates, rising from 1.9% to 2.45% and 3.15% per year across the pessimistic, trend, and optimistic scenarios, respectively.
For paper and paperboard products, aggregate consumption increases from 1.13% annually in the pessimistic scenario to 1.70% under the trend scenario and 2.45% under the optimistic scenario. Printing paper consumption grows from 1.53% per year to 1.96% and 2.52% per year across the three scenarios, while wrapping paper follows a similar pattern, with growth rates of 1.15%, 1.50%, and 1.96% per year, respectively.
External deficit projections also vary across GDP growth scenarios. The wood-related external deficit grows at an average annual rate of 1.51% under the pessimistic scenario, 2.36% under the trend scenario, and 3.50% under the optimistic scenario. For paper and paperboard, the external deficit increases from 2.11% per year to 3.10% and 4.43% per year across the pessimistic, trend, and optimistic scenarios.

4. Discussion

Over the study period, Tunisia’s wood sector has been exposed to several major structural events, including trade liberalization with the European Union, global financial shocks, political transitions, and the COVID-19 pandemic. These events may have affected short-term demand and trade flows. However, the present analysis focuses on long-term structural trends rather than event-specific dynamics. Consequently, the results should be interpreted as reflecting underlying demand patterns rather than short-term shocks.
The elasticities of income for different products vary considerably. For instance, at the international level, elasticities vary greatly from one group of countries to another [28]. Elasticity estimates can be obtained by considering differences between countries, taking into account consumer preferences and choices [28]. It has also been shown that elasticities can vary from one period to another, but also between groups of countries with low and high incomes, considering the fact that effective elasticities could be obtained by grouping as many observations as possible [29]. The literature also shows that an increasing trend was found between per-capita GDP and per-capita consumption for 33 OECD member countries and 6 BRIKS. Nevertheless, consumption declined over time when a high level of income was attained [30].
While the prices of products and their substitutes were the explanatory variables in previous models, the present analysis indicates that other variables, such as technological progress—proxied here by access to the Internet—also contribute to explaining the consumption of wood and wood-derived products.
The results of this work also demonstrate the lack of a correlation between the consumption of forest products and the production of industrial wood, a finding that has been confirmed by several authors [19,29]. On the other hand, labor costs affect the performance of the trade in wood products. Indeed, growing competition from emerging countries is leading to significant changes in international trade flows of wood and wood-derived products [18].
In Tunisia, demand for wood and wood-derived products is expected to increase from 2.1 million cubic meters in 2024 to 3.2 million m3 in 2050, based on an annual growth rate in income of 1.2%. According to the FAO, the global demand for primary processed wood products is expected to increase from 2.286 million m3 in 2020 to 3.124 million m3 in 2050 [31]. For the period of 2024–2050, demand growth in Tunisia is estimated to be 52%, which is higher than global growth (37%). This growth would be 71% for sawnwood, 114% for panels, 40% for veneers, and 55% for paper and paperboard. Thus, panels continue to replace sawnwood in multiple applications such as furniture, construction, and packaging. According to the FAO, global demand for primary processed wood products is expected to increase from 2.286 million m3 to 3.124 million m3 in 2050 [31]. Following this estimate, demand for industrial roundwood will grow by 25 to 45% between 2020 and 2050, depending on the intensity of use of industrial residues. Globally, trends vary from one product to another: an increase of 30% is projected for sawnwood, 72% for particleboard and fiberboard, and 102% for veneer and plywood. Trends also vary by region and country. The higher growth rate for Tunisia is mainly explained by greater income elasticity.
The magnitude of estimated income elasticities reflects differences in consumption behavior and product maturity. Higher elasticities for panels and sawnwood indicate strong sensitivity to income growth, consistent with construction-related demand. In contrast, lower elasticities for veneers and newsprint suggest more mature or declining consumption patterns. These differences also reveal substitution effects driven by technological progress, notably the increasing use of panels and recycled materials. From a trade perspective, high income elasticities combined with limited domestic supply capacity contribute to rising import dependence and reduced international competitiveness.
These findings are consistent with international evidence reported by Buongiorno in 2015, who showed that income elasticities for several forest product categories tend to remain relatively stable over long periods, while differing significantly across product types and stages of processing [32]. In particular, the higher elasticities observed for sawnwood and panels are associated with construction-related demand, whereas lower elasticities characterize more mature products such as paper and newsprint. This reinforces the interpretation that long-term demand dynamics are driven more by structural consumption patterns and technological substitution than by short-term price fluctuations. In this perspective, the Tunisian case illustrates how stable demand elasticities, combined with limited domestic resource availability, translate into persistent import dependence.
A comparison of the obtained results with previous publications from 1998 and 2008 shows a strong correlation between the consumption of wood and wood-derived products and the income per capita in Tunisia, with relatively high elasticity, which has already been confirmed [14,17]. However, there is a significant discrepancy between the results of projections based on previous models, coupled with an assumption of annual growth in income of 3.2%, and the actual observations in 2024 of wood and wood-derived product consumption.
This is also the case in Turkey, where demand for imported wood depends mainly on the import prices of sawn timber and the prices of domestic logs, rather than on changes in production [33]. While producer countries (the United States, Finland, Sweden, Romania, and Russia) remain among Tunisia’s main suppliers of wood and wood-derived products, some neighboring countries (Turkey, Italy, Spain, and Portugal) are emerging as suppliers of wood and wood-derived products in 2024.
Unlike many countries where imports of wood products have a significant impact on ongoing forest transitions [34], the absence of an appropriate forest management and exploitation program has meant that trade in wood and wood-derived products is carried out with the aim of satisfying demand without any link to timber harvesting [35]. The forest code needs to be revised in order to meet the needs of primary processing industries while following sustainable forest management guidelines [36].
These findings are consistent with international evidence showing that forest-poor countries often experience rising import dependence despite economic growth. Similar patterns of substitution, technological upgrading, and structural transformation have been observed in other regions, reinforcing the relevance of the Tunisian case within the broader forest sector literature.

5. Conclusions

This article explores the relationships between apparent consumption and the external trade deficit in wood and wood-derived products on the one side, and income, the production of industrial wood and fiber for paper manufacturing, prices, technological progress, and labor costs on the other side. Income remains the main variable explaining the apparent consumption and external deficit, but other variables such as technological progress, prices, labor costs, and fiber production from Stipa tenacissima for paper also play a considerable role. A slowdown in demand can be noticed in the most recent years, which can be explained by the decline in income growth, but also by technological developments in the wood, paper, and paperboard industry, which are reflected in the trend toward substituting wood with other materials, and sawnwood and veneers with panels. In addition, the substantial increase in paper recycling and the rise in digitalization and the use of information networks are structural changes that will encourage this trend. In order to reduce the deficit in wood and wood-derived products, the wood and paper industries should increase their competitiveness, and the production of raw materials must also increase to ensure a regular supply to these industries. Current wood harvests have remained at the same level since 2004 despite the country’s reforestation efforts. Indeed, Tunisia has seen a significant increase in forest plantations, from 643,000 ha in 1990 to 687,000 ha in 2025, with forest plantations covering around 262,000 ha between 1990 and 2022 [11]. The development of productive forests will increase production potential as part of a long-term sustainable wood management and harvesting strategy. In addition, industrial innovation focused on the use of lower-quality wood is an argument in favor of promoting local wood. However, the lack of coordination between logging and primary wood processing within the same sector, the wood sector, hinders any short-term sectoral momentum.
The effects of increased demand for industrial wood in a country or region are not necessarily limited to those countries or regions, but can also be supplied from other countries and regions through changes in consumption, production, and trade patterns induced by variations in the prices of wood and wood products. Distortions between supply trends (industrial wood and Alfa harvests) and demand for wood and wood-derived products may explain the current deficit.
This study contributes to the literature by providing a long-term, integrated analysis of demand and trade dynamics in a forest-poor country. While the results highlight robust structural relationships, they also point to the need for future research combining long-run and short-run modeling approaches.

Author Contributions

M.K. and H.D.-H. were responsible for the overall design of the study, the methodology, the interpretation of the results, and the writing of the manuscript. H.S. and A.C. contributed to the econometric test and the revision of the manuscript. S.J. contributed to the critical review of the manuscript, with substantive input on structure and clarity. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Funded by the European Union under the Horizon Europe Framework Programme Grant Agreement Nº: 101182176. The views and opinions expressed are, however, those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or of the European Research Executive Agency. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A. Diagnostic Tests of Econometric Models

Table A1. Summary of diagnostic tests based on regressors.
Table A1. Summary of diagnostic tests based on regressors.
Dependent VariableIndependent
Variables (X)
Multicollinearity
(VIF)
Heteroskedasticity
(Breusch–Pagan)
Residual Autocorrelation (Durbin’s Alternative)
LN_Cas
(Sawnwood)
LN_Y, LN_PpMean VIF = 4.05χ2(2) = 6.50, p = 0.039χ2(1) = 16.94, p < 0.001
LN_Capa
(Panels)
LN_Y, LN_Capa(t − 1)Mean VIF = 7.73χ2(1) = 1.33, p = 0.249χ2(2) = 0.19, p = 0.910
LN_Capl
(Veneers and plywood)
LN_P0pl, LN_P0pp, LN_Pp, LN_Capl(t − 1)Mean VIF = 1.80χ2(4) = 8.11, p = 0.088χ2(1) = 7.05, p = 0.008
LN_Capi (Printing paper)LN_YNot applicable
(single regressor)
Not applicable
(static model)
Not applicable
(static model)
LN_Capj (Newsprint)LN_Capj(t − 1), LN_netMean VIF = 1.12χ2(2) = 0.20, p = 0.905χ2(1) = 7.23, p = 0.007
LN_Capce
(Wrapping and paperboard)
LN_Y, LN_Capce(t − 1)Mean VIF = 3.22χ2(2) = 31.11, p < 0.001χ2(2) = 0.38, p = 0.828
LN_Capc
(Paper and paperboard)
LN_Y, LN_Capc(t − 1)Mean VIF = 7.26χ2(2) = 5.84, p = 0.054χ2(1) = 10.41, p = 0.005
LN_Cabob
(Wood and wood articles)
LN_Y, LN_PpMean VIF = 4.05χ2(2) = 3.31, p = 0.191χ2(2) = 5.72, p = 0.057
LN_Db (Deficit—wood)LN_Y, LN_CtMean VIF = 3.13χ2(2) = 0.20, p = 0.907χ2(2) = 2.98, p = 0.226
LN_Dpc (Deficit—paper)LN_Y, LN_PropcMean VIF = 1.56χ2(2) = 5.45, p = 0.066χ2(2) = 1.65, p = 0.439
Note: Heteroskedasticity is tested using the Breusch–Pagan test conditional on the explanatory variables. Multicollinearity is assessed using the VIF. Residual autocorrelation is examined using Durbin’s alternative test. Reported statistics correspond to the respective test statistics and associated p-values.

References

  1. FAO. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2025; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2025; ISBN 9789251400821. [Google Scholar]
  2. Guillochon, B. Théorie de l’échange International—Collection Sup by Guillochon Bernard: Bon Couverture Souple (1976) | Le-Livre; Presses Universitaires de France: Paris, France, 1976. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bit, J.; Banerjee, S. Consumption of Wood Products and Dependence on Imports: A Study on Post-Reform India. Foreign Trade Rev. 2014, 49, 263–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Prestemon, J.; Buongiorno, J. Elasticities of Demand for Forest Products Based on Time-Series and Cross-Sectional Data. In Proceedings of the Quelles Sources Statistiques Pour une Modélisation de la Filière Bois? Centre de Recherche et D’études en Gestion—Groupe de Recherche en Economie des Produits Forestiers—Université de Bordeaux I: Bordeaux, France, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bonnefoi, B.; Buongiorno, J. Comparative Advantage of Countries in Forest-Products Trade. For. Ecol. Manag. 1990, 36, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lundmark, R. European Trade in Forest Products and Fuels. J. For. Econ. 2010, 16, 235–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Levet, A.L.; Guinard, L.; Purohoo, I. Le Commerce Extérieur Des Produits Bois: Existe-t-Il Réellement Un Paradoxe Français? Rev. For. Fr. 2021, 66, 51–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Iriarte-Goñi, I.; Ayuda, M.I. Not Only Subterranean Forests: Wood Consumption and Economic Development in Britain (1850–1938). Ecol. Econ. 2012, 77, 176–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Uusivuori, J.; Uusivuori, J. Comparative Advantage and Forest Endowment in Forest Products Trade: Evidence from Panel Data of OECD-Countries. J. For. Econ. 2002, 8, 53–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, L.; Chen, Y.; Yu, J.; Cheng, R. Analysis of the Trade Network of Global Wood Forest Products and Its Evolution from 1995 to 2020. For. Prod. J. 2024, 72, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. FAO. Évaluation Des Ressources Forestières Mondiales 2025 Rapport Tunisie; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  12. Daly-Hassen, H.; Kasraoui, M.; Karra, C. Le Bois Industriel En Tunisie: Aggravation de La Dépendance Extérieure Malgré Les Reboisements. Bois For. Des Trop. 2014, 322, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Buongiorno, J. Country-Specific Demand Elasticities for Forest Products: Estimation Method and Consequences for Long Term Projections. For. Policy Econ. 2019, 106, 101967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Daly-Hassen, H.; Chebil, A.; Ben Moussa, B. La Demande de de Bois et Produits Dérivés En Tunisie: Evolution et Perspectives à l’horizon 2030. In Proceedings of the Colloque Euro-Maghrébin sur les Bois Méditerranéens; Université de Boumerdès: Boumerdes, Algeria, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  15. Daly-Hassen, H.; Khouaja, A.; Chebil, A. Impact de La Baisse Des Tarifs Douaniers Sur l’Industrie Du Bois Local En Tunisie. New Medit 2008, 3, 28–31. [Google Scholar]
  16. McMahon, J.M.; Hasan, S.; Brooks, A.; Curwen, G.; Dyke, J.; Saint Ange, C.; Smart, J.C.R. Challenges in Modelling the Sediment Retention Ecosystem Service to Inform an Ecosystem Account—Examples from the Mitchell Catchment in Northern Australia. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 314, 115102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Daly-Hassen, H. Les Perspectives de l’offre et de La Demande de Bois Rond Industriel En Tunisie à l’horizon 2015. Ann. L’inrat 1998, 71, 275–296. [Google Scholar]
  18. Panico, T.; Tambaro, F.; Caracciolo, F.; Gorgitano, M.T. Assessing Italy’s Comparative Advantages and Intra-Industry Trade in Global Wood Products. Forests 2024, 15, 1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tian, M.; Li, L.; Wan, L.; Liu, J.; de Jong, W. Forest Product Trade, Wood Consumption, and Forest Conservation—The Case of 61 Countries. J. Sustain. For. 2017, 36, 717–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Régie d’Exploitation Forestière. Rapports Annuels D’activité (1990–2022); Ministère de l’Agriculture: Tunis, Tunisia; Available online: http://www.agriculture.tn/ (accessed on 25 May 2025).
  21. National Institute of statistics (INS). Evolution Annuelle Du SMIG. Available online: https://ins.tn/statistiques/90 (accessed on 18 July 2025).
  22. National Institute of Statistics (INS). Statistiques Du Commerce Extérieur. Available online: http://apps.ins.tn/comex/fr/index.php (accessed on 10 April 2025).
  23. FAO. Coefficients de Conversion. Available online: https://www.fao.org/4/x5341f/x5341f09.htm (accessed on 25 May 2025).
  24. Banque Centrale de Tunisie (BCT) Statistique—BCT. Available online: https://www.bct.gov.tn/bct/siteprod/tableau_n.jsp?params=PL203150,PL203160 (accessed on 22 November 2025).
  25. World Bank Group (WBG). Individuals Using the Internet (% of Population). Available online: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IT.NET.USER.ZS (accessed on 22 November 2025).
  26. World Bank Group (WBG). Inflation, Consumer Prices (Annual %)—Tunisia. Available online: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/FP.CPI.TOTL.ZG?locations=TN (accessed on 22 November 2025).
  27. Cilliers, J.; Welborn, L.; Kwasi, S. The Rebirth Tunisia’s Potential Development Pathways to 2040. ISS N. Afr. Rep. 2020, 2020, 1–36. [Google Scholar]
  28. Michinaka, T.; Tachibana, S.; Turner, J.A. Estimating Price and Income Elasticities of Demand for Forest Products: Cluster Analysis Used as a Tool in Grouping. For. Policy Econ. 2011, 13, 435–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tian, M.; Wan, L. Effects of Economic Development and Forest Product Trade on Wood Consumption. Resour. Sci. 2015, 37, 522–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kayo, C.; Oka, H.; Hashimoto, S.; Mizukami, M.; Takagi, S. Socioeconomic Development and Wood Consumption. J. For. Res. 2015, 20, 309–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. FAO. Global Forest Sector Outlook 2050: Assessing Future Demand and Sources of Timber for a Sustainable Economy; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2022; ISBN 978-92-5-136950-0. [Google Scholar]
  32. Buongiorno, J. Income and Time Dependence of Forest Product Demand Elasticities and Implications for Forecasting. Silva Fenn. 2015, 49, 1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kayacan, B.; Kara, O.; Ucal, M.Ş.; Öztürk, A.; Bali, R.; Koçer, S.; Kaplan, E. An Econometric Analysis of Imported Timber Demand in Turkey. J. Biomed. Inform. 2013, 11, 791–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kastner, T.; Erb, K.H.; Nonhebel, S. International Wood Trade and Forest Change: A Global Analysis. Glob. Environ. Change 2011, 21, 947–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Buongiorno, J.; Johnston, C.; Zhu, S. An Assessment of Gains and Losses from International Trade in the Forest Sector. For. Policy Econ. 2017, 80, 209–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. African Natural Resources Management and Investment Centre. Economic Performance of the Timber Industry in North Africa; African Natural Resources Management and Investment Centre: Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire, 2022. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Classification of wood and wood-derived products used in this study.
Figure 1. Classification of wood and wood-derived products used in this study.
Forests 17 00202 g001
Figure 2. Apparent consumption of wood and wood articles (BOB) and paper and paperboard (BFP) in 1000 m3 RWE.
Figure 2. Apparent consumption of wood and wood articles (BOB) and paper and paperboard (BFP) in 1000 m3 RWE.
Forests 17 00202 g002
Figure 3. The evolution of external deficit in wood and wood articles and paper and paperboard categories (Million TND).
Figure 3. The evolution of external deficit in wood and wood articles and paper and paperboard categories (Million TND).
Forests 17 00202 g003
Figure 4. Evolution of the foreign dependency coefficient (FDCoeff) for wood and wood products and their major groups of products.
Figure 4. Evolution of the foreign dependency coefficient (FDCoeff) for wood and wood products and their major groups of products.
Forests 17 00202 g004
Figure 5. Wood and wood article consumption (in 1000 RWE): historical trends (1975–2024) and 2050 forecasting under 1.2% annual growth in GDP/capita.
Figure 5. Wood and wood article consumption (in 1000 RWE): historical trends (1975–2024) and 2050 forecasting under 1.2% annual growth in GDP/capita.
Forests 17 00202 g005
Figure 6. Paper and paperboard consumption (in 1000 t): historical trends (1975–2024) and 2050 forecasting under 1.2% annual growth in GDP/capita.
Figure 6. Paper and paperboard consumption (in 1000 t): historical trends (1975–2024) and 2050 forecasting under 1.2% annual growth in GDP/capita.
Forests 17 00202 g006
Table 1. Conversion coefficient to m3 roundwood equivalents (RWE).
Table 1. Conversion coefficient to m3 roundwood equivalents (RWE).
m3/tm3 RWE/m3m3 RWE/t
Roundwood1.5
Sawnwood1.71.7
Panels1.51.55
Veneers1.332.3
Plywood1.542.3
Wooden structures1.62
Wooden furniture1.62.2
Mechanical wood pulp 2.44
Chemical wood pulp 4.64
Paper and cardboard paperboard waste 1.8
Paper, cardboard, and paperboard 2.88 (average)
Sources [23].
Table 2. List of dependent and independent variables, indicators, symbols, and units (source: [20,21,22,24,25,26].
Table 2. List of dependent and independent variables, indicators, symbols, and units (source: [20,21,22,24,25,26].
VariableIndicator/DefinitionSymbolUnit
Dependent variablesApparent consumptionApparent consumption of the different wood and wood-derived products considered in Figure 1.CAjm3 or t
DeficitTotal net imports of the different wood and wood-derived products groupsDj1000 TND
Independent variablesDemand (income)Gross Domestic Product per capitaYTND/capita
Availability of raw materials
(wood industry)
Estimated industrial wood production, equal to 60% of total wood harvestProbm3
Availability of raw materials
(paper industry)
Paper pulp production (from alfa fiber and sisal) plus waste paper productionPropcm3 RWE
Product priceProduct price at constant pricesP0jTND/m3 or TND/t
Substitute priceSubstitute product price at constant pricesPsTND/m3 or TND/t
Price indexConsumer Price IndexPI
Share of panel consumptionShare of panel consumption (particleboard and fiberboard) relative to the sum of panel and sawnwood consumptionPp%
Technological progress
(paper industry)
Share of waste paper in total paper and paperboard consumptionPTpc%
Labor costsMinimum guaranteed interprofessional wage (SMIG) in TunisiaCtTND/hour
Internet accessIndividuals using the Internet (% of population)net%
Lagged consumptionApparent consumption of product j in the previous periodCaj(t−1)
Table 3. Evolution of apparent consumption of different wood and wood-derived products.
Table 3. Evolution of apparent consumption of different wood and wood-derived products.
Wood and Wood Articles (BOB)Paper and Paper Board (PC)Wood and Wood
Derived Products
Sawn
Wood
Panels
(Fiber and Particle)
Veneers
and Plywood
NewsprintPrinting PaperWrapping
and Paperboard
Unit1000 m31000 m31000 m31000 t1000 t1000 t1000 m3 RWE
1975113.223.18.02.914.677.6596.4
1985257.941.138.710.327.094.3997.6
1995358.857.641.613.741.3102.41281.8
2005480.7103.049.119.950.0126.71825
2015446.4262.317.515.071.0188.82370.8
2024266.5249.310.56.570.0179.82092.4
Source: Calculations based on international trade data from the National Institute of Statistics [22].
Table 4. Summary statistics of apparent consumption and external deficit parameters of wood and wood-derived products in Tunisia.
Table 4. Summary statistics of apparent consumption and external deficit parameters of wood and wood-derived products in Tunisia.
Dependent Variable Independent VariableCoefficient p-Value R2R2 AdjustedStandard Error
of Estimate
FSig.
(p-Value)
LN_Cas
(n = 44)
LN_Y0.8600.0000.7210.7080.07653.1020.000
LN_Pp−0.5750.000
LN_Capa
(n = 49)
LN_Y0.3480.0050.9800.9790.0931146.0880.000
Ln_Capa-10.8250.000
LN_Capl
(n = 49)
Ln_Capl-10.3780.0020.6420.6100.19619.7480.000
LN_P0pl−0.5520.002
LN_Pp−0.1860.010
LN_P0pp0.2410.026
LN_Capj
(n = 25)
Ln_Capj-11.0060.0000.9200.9120.167120.8960.000
Ln_net−0.0260.141
LN_Capi
(n = 45)
LN_Y0.7010.0000.6310.6220.16673.3950.000
LN_Capce
(n = 40)
LN_Y0.4440.0000.8200.8100.09384.1830.000
LN_Capce-10.2430.018
LN_Cabob
(n = 42)
LN_Y0.6340.0000.7250.7100.07651.2870.000
LN_Pp−0.2040.000
LN_Capc
(n = 49)
LN_Y0.4210.0010.9300.9270.097307.2460.000
LN_Capc-10.5730.000
Ln_DB
(n = 22)
Ln_Ct1.2690.0250.7420.7150.10227.3580.000
LnY1.4050.000
Ln_Dpc
(n = 26)
LnY1.6280.0000.7790.7600.18740.6230.000
Ln_Propc−0.8790.001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Daly-Hassen, H.; Khalfaoui, M.; Sliti, H.; Chebil, A.; Jebari, S. Demand and Net Import Modeling and Forecasting for Wood Products in a Country with Limited Forest Resources (Tunisia). Forests 2026, 17, 202. https://doi.org/10.3390/f17020202

AMA Style

Daly-Hassen H, Khalfaoui M, Sliti H, Chebil A, Jebari S. Demand and Net Import Modeling and Forecasting for Wood Products in a Country with Limited Forest Resources (Tunisia). Forests. 2026; 17(2):202. https://doi.org/10.3390/f17020202

Chicago/Turabian Style

Daly-Hassen, Hamed, Mariem Khalfaoui, Hammadi Sliti, Ali Chebil, and Sihem Jebari. 2026. "Demand and Net Import Modeling and Forecasting for Wood Products in a Country with Limited Forest Resources (Tunisia)" Forests 17, no. 2: 202. https://doi.org/10.3390/f17020202

APA Style

Daly-Hassen, H., Khalfaoui, M., Sliti, H., Chebil, A., & Jebari, S. (2026). Demand and Net Import Modeling and Forecasting for Wood Products in a Country with Limited Forest Resources (Tunisia). Forests, 17(2), 202. https://doi.org/10.3390/f17020202

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop