Next Article in Journal
Monitoring and Discrimination of Salt Stress in Salix matsudana × alba Using Vis/NIR-HSI Technology
Previous Article in Journal
Comparative Multi-Omics Analysis Reveals Key Pathways in Chlorophyll Metabolism and Stress Adaptation in Poplar Under Dual Stress
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Solid Microbial Fertilizers Prepared with Different Carriers Have the Potential to Enhance Plant Growth

Forests 2025, 16(3), 539; https://doi.org/10.3390/f16030539
by Lianhao Sun 1, Yuexiang Zhou 1, Hui Nie 1, Chong Li 1,2, Xin Liu 1, Jie Lin 1, Xiongfei Zhang 3 and Jinchi Zhang 1,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Forests 2025, 16(3), 539; https://doi.org/10.3390/f16030539
Submission received: 12 February 2025 / Revised: 9 March 2025 / Accepted: 18 March 2025 / Published: 19 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Forest Soil)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Dear Authors,

The review comments can be found in the PDF file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

In manuscript «Solid microbial fertilizers prepared with different carriers have the potential to enhance plant growth» examines the influence of various solid microbial inoculants on the restoration of degraded soils. The manuscript is in line with the theme of the journal. The article is a relevant study and the findings are interpreted correctly. The conclusions are consistent with the evidence and arguments presented. The manuscript complements existing knowledge, the research is clear and well-structured for the readership.

In the introduction, in sentence «Recent studies have found that microorganisms play important regulatory roles in the phytoremediation of degraded soils [6].», I propose replacing phytoremediation with bioremediation for a more correct statement.

The numbering in the list of references is duplicated.

Author Response

Please see attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The authors addressed most of the comments during the review process.

I believe the manuscript has been adequately improved and can be considered for publication in the journal Forest."

Back to TopTop