Next Article in Journal
Exploration of the Spatiotemporal Characteristics and Driving Mechanisms of Vegetation Greenness Changes in Laos
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring the Possibility of Ionic Liquid as a Dimensional Stabilizer for Well-Preserved Waterlogged Archaeological Wood
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Significant Shifts in Predominant Plant Dispersal Modes in Pine Forests of the Southern Urals (Russia): Responses to Technogenic Pollution and Ground Fires

1
Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology UB RAS, 620144 Yekaterinburg, Russia
2
Ilmensky State Reserve, Federal State Budgetary Institution of Science South Urals Research Center of Mineralogy and Geo-Ecology UB RAS, 456317 Miass, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2024, 15(12), 2161; https://doi.org/10.3390/f15122161
Submission received: 28 October 2024 / Revised: 1 December 2024 / Accepted: 5 December 2024 / Published: 7 December 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Forest Biodiversity)

Abstract

:
The purpose of this work was to assess the functional diversity of herb–shrub layer com munities determined by their dispersal mode in pine boreal forests depending on two factors: (i) the degree of technogenic heavy metal pollution and (ii) the time passed since the last fire. We tested two hypotheses: (1) the functional diversity of communities determined by their diaspore dispersal mode decreases in polluted forests and in forests disturbed by recent fires; (2) the abundance, i.e., participation of anemochorous species in communities, is relatively greater in polluted forests and in forests disturbed by recent fires than in unpolluted or in forests that have not burned for a long time. We analyzed 77 vegetation relevés made in polluted and unpolluted pine forests to obtain the impact gradient of the Karabash copper smelter (South Urals, Russia). The studied forests also had different durations of time since the last ground fire—from 1 to 60 years. Two classifications of the diaspore dispersal modes were used. We found that community functional diversity and predominant dispersal modes changed significantly in response to technogenic pollution and, to a lesser extent, in response to ground fires. In polluted forests, the importance of species with a long diaspore dispersal distance—anemochores and zoochores—increased. This result suggests conducting a specific study of long-distance diaspore migration as a possibly underestimated factor of community formation under severe technogenic disturbances. The importance of zoochores in a broad sense, including species with diaspores dispersed by vertebrates and invertebrates, increased in post-fire succession. This result coincides with the known pattern of increasing abundance of zoochorous plants in regenerative successions in tropical forests. Therefore, the data on plant–animal interactions can possibly provide valuable information on succession mechanisms in taiga forests.

1. Introduction

Reproduction, including diaspore production and dispersal, is a key ontogenesis stage of all organisms. The number, mass, range and seed dispersal mode are important traits, according to which the composition of specific communities is formed from species pools through a system of environmental filters [1,2,3]. The most important characteristic of dispersal success is the dispersal distance of seeds or other diaspores [4], which is clearly related to the dispersal mode [5,6].
Successional changes in the properties of seeds, their mass, and dispersal mode were studied mainly using the example of trees [7,8,9,10,11,12], rather than herbaceous plants. Another specific feature of the research array on changes in seed properties, their mass, and dispersal modes in successions is that such studies have often been conducted in tropical forests [12,13,14,15,16]. The results of studying tree successions in tropical forests suggested the relative predominance of anemochorous species at the initial stages of succession and an increase in the abundance of zoochorous species as succession progresses [3,12].
In taiga (boreal forests), the variety of tree species is generally low, and the diversity of plant communities is mainly influenced by the variety of herbs, subshrubs, and shrubs. The ontogenesis of many groundcover forest plant species is shorter than the ontogenesis of woody plants. Therefore, consideration of different adaptations to diaspora dispersal may be as important for understanding the mechanisms of plant community assemblage, mechanisms of herb and shrub species persistence in specific habitats as a similar consideration for woody plants. In the Southern Urals region, the suboptimal conditions for forest vegetation in the zonal forest-steppe ecotone combined with intensive industrial development of the territory result in increased vulnerability of forests to ongoing and expected climate change. The region near the South Urals city of Karabash is a geographically extensive contrasting ecosystem impact region formed by emissions from a large copper smelter (Karabash copper smelter) that has been operating for more than 100 years [17]. The main toxicants are metals from atmospheric emissions [17]. Another constant factor determining the region’s vegetation is periodic forest fires [18,19]. Thus, the state of forest communities in this region may be determined not only by the technogenic impact, but also by regular fire disturbances, and different forest areas are at different stages of secondary post-fire succession. As pollution increases, species richness usually decreases, although the effects are not the same across studies (meta-analysis [20,21,22,23]). The consequences of forest fires are less predictable and depend on fire intensity and fire frequency [24,25,26]. The diversity of plant communities after fires can either decrease [24,26,27], or remain unchanged [25,28,29].
The features of biology and dispersal of seeds and diasporas have often been studied in connection with habitat fragmentation [4,30,31]. However, information about the specifics of the herbaceous plant dissemination in forests under the influence of pollution and fires is limited. The study [32] shows that the least vulnerable species to technogenic transformation of habitats are anemochores, whose diaspores can spread far and wide even in the absence of specialized carriers. The abundance of annual species may increase immediately following fires, which may be related to the short maturation time, small size, and easy dispersal of seeds [33]. The abundance of some species with a short ontogenesis after ground, i.e., not total, fires may also be caused by the development of individuals from the soil seed bank [34]. Fire disturbances can affect the number of seed produced by perennial species [35,36].
The purpose of this work is to assess the functional diversity of herb–shrub layer communities determined by the seed dispersal mode in forests that have been polluted by the Karabash copper smelter emissions and have different durations of time since the last fire disturbance. We tested two hypotheses: (1) the functional diversity of communities determined by their diaspore dispersal mode decreases in polluted forests and in forests disturbed by recent fires; (2) the abundance, i.e., participation of anemochorous species in communities, is relatively greater in polluted forests and in forests disturbed by recent fires than in unpolluted or in forests that have not burned for a long time. As can be seen, we assumed similar community responses to different types of disturbances. Hypotheses were formulated as the most probable based on the analysis of known data.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The study area belongs to the subzone of southern taiga pine-birch forests of the eastern macro-slope of the Southern Urals (Chelyabinsk Region; the vicinity of the city of Karabash and the Ilmensky State Reserve UB RAS; abbreviation—ISR). Typical heights of the uplands are 250–600 m a.s.l. Albic Luvisols and Luvisols soils predominate. According to the Köppen–Geiger classification [37], the climate is cold with short warm summers (code—Dfb). The growing season is 160–170 days; precipitation is about 430 mm per year; snow cover height is up to 40 cm. Predominant vegetation types are forb pine forests and secondary grass-forb birch forests.
The ISR was established in 1920 and is categorized as IA, Strict Nature Reserve, state nature reserve, according to the International Union for Conservation of Nature classification. The ISR area is 30.4 thousand ha. The average age of the main generation trees in coniferous forests is 80–180 years. On average, 14–16 forest fires are registered in the territory of the ISR per year. The complete fire cycle for the entire reserve is 360 years. Between 1948 and 2014, the number of fires increased [18] and fire localizations changed in the peripheral, border areas of the reserve [19].
The Karabash copper smelter (KCS, Karabashmed JSC, Karabash) is a major source of emissions, the main of which are SO2 and dust containing mainly Cu, Zn, Pb and Cd. The zone of disturbed ecosystems extends up to 15–25 km from the KCS [17]. Chemical pollution of ecosystems results in a decrease in phytomass and forest productivity [38], a decrease in microbial diversity and biomass in soils [39,40] and changes in the conditions of mineral nutrition of plants [41,42].

2.2. Sample Plots

We studied 77 sample plots (SPs) in maturing, mature and overmature natural pine forests on the middle and lower parts of slopes on Albic Luvisols and Luvisols soils in the absence of waterlogging. Forty-one plots were located at distances of 3.5–12 km from the KCS (impact zone); thirty-six plots were located 25–50 km south of the KCS in the ISR forests (Figure 1). The sample plots were not selected randomly. They were selected in such a way as to cover as wide a range of fire ages as possible. Within the burned forest areas, specific locations for performing vegetation relevés were selected randomly. In the study area, the transfer of air masses from the southwest to the northeast predominates; therefore, the Ilmensky State Nature Reserve, which is located south of the smelter, can be considered a background (control) area by pollution level. The time since the last fire disturbance was represented as the number of years passed between the last recorded fire and the time when the vegetation relevé was performed. Years of fires were established from the Fire Record Books of the Ilmensky Reserve and the Karabash Forestry. The SPs with ground stable medium fires were considered burned; plots with crown fires were not considered. If there were no information about fires in the study area and no visual consequences of fires, such areas were considered unburned for 60 years. The designation for characterizing the duration of the post-fire period is N years no fire.

2.3. Characteristics of Plant Species and Plant Communities

Geobotanical relevés were performed in a 10 × 10 m area in July and the first half of August: 2017—24 SP; 2018—33 SP; 2019—18 SP; 2021—2 SP. The number of herb–shrub species per 100 m2 was recorded and the total projective cover (%) of the aerial portions and projective cover (%) of each species of herb–shrub layers were visually assessed. No devices were used to determine the projective cover. The total cover of epigeic mosses on the SPs was determined (%). Names of vascular plant species were given according to the Plants of the World Online [43]. The Shannon diversity index was calculated based on field relevés.
In total, 167 species of the herb–shrub layer were recorded in 77 vegetation relevés. For these species, two approaches were used to determine their dispersal mode.
First, the traditional dispersal mode classification was used. In accordance with this classification, species are divided into groups by their seed dispersal modes with the identification of “dispersal syndromes”, including anemochores, autochores, zoochores and others. We used the following sources: [44,45,46]. A total of 158 (95%) species were identified as having distribution syndromes according to the traditional classification. Four syndromes were analyzed: anemochores, autochores (including ballistochores), zoochores (including epizoochores and endozoochores), and myrmecochores (Table 1).
The second dispersal mode classification is chronologically more recent [47]. The classification is based on the assumption that one species can be adapted to different diaspore dispersal modes, and in accordance with it, so-called “dispersal strategies” are distinguished. To clearly distinguish between the two classification options of seed dispersal modes, we used the terms “traditional classification” and “new classification”. Dispersal strategies for 136 (81%) species according to the new classification were determined on the basis of information in the Pladias—Database of the Czech Flora and Vegetation [48]. Five strategies were analyzed: Allium-type, Bidens-type, Cornus-type, Epilobium-type and Lycopodium-type strategies.
Using the FDiversity program [49] and considering dispersal modes as a functional trait, we calculated the community functional diversity characteristics—the FAD and Rao index. The FAD index (functional attribute diversity) is the number of trait combinations occurring in a community; it is always less than or equal to the number of community species. The Rao parameter combines information about species richness and differences in functional characteristics between pairs of species. The community weighted mean (CWM) of plants with different dispersal modes was calculated using estimates of projective cover of species as weights, as shown below:
C W M = i = 1 S w i
where S is the number of species with this dispersal mode and wi is the proportion of the i-th species projective cover in the sum of projective covers of all species in the vegetation relevé.

2.4. Determination of Technogenic Impact

Concentrations of Cu, Zn, Pb and Cd were measured in samples from the middle layer of the forest floor. For each SP, sampling was performed at three sites located 5–6 m from each other. At each site, samples were collected using the envelope method from an area of 1 m2. One mixed sample was formed from the material collected from the three plots. Decomposition with a mixture of concentrated nitric acid and hydrogen peroxide was used. This method determined almost all forms of metals present in the forest floor (pseudo total concentrations) [50]. Concentrations of elements were determined with a VARIAN-720-ES atomic emission spectrometer (ICP-OES method) (Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, USA). Measurements were carried out at the South Ural Collective Center for the Study of Mineral Raw Materials of the Institute of Mineralogy of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (accreditation certificate No. AAS.A.00330, valid until 3 November 2026). The pollution index was calculated characterizing the average excess (arbitrary units—number of times) of Cu, Zn, Pb, Cd concentrations for four elements in each area compared to the least polluted area [51]. The decimal logarithm (Log(PI)) of the pollution index was used.
The concentrations of Cu varied from 14 to 74 mg/kg in the forest floors of the ISR and from 293 to 6143 mg/kg in forest floors from the KCS; the concentrations of Zn ranged from 78 to 339 mg/kg and from 666 to 4514 mg/kg; the concentrations of Pb ranged from 19 to 76 mg/kg and from 385 to 2952 mg/kg; the concentrations of Cd ranged from 0.62 to 1.91 mg/kg and from 5.35 to 37.70 mg/kg, respectively. That is, on average, the content of metals in the impact zone exceeded their content in the background forests by tens and sometimes hundreds of times. The values of the pollution index in the ISR were from 1 to 4 rel. units, and near the KCS, the values ranged from 15 to 175 rel. units.

2.5. Data Analysis

Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) was used to assess the relationship between variables. The dendrogram was constructed using the distance (1 − r) and the single linkage method. To select the optimal combination of explanatory predictors and to determine the further method of statistical analysis, the AIC calculation was used. We compared the information content of two predictors—N years no fire and Log(PI)—and two of their combinations, respectively, including and not including the interaction between the following predictors: (i) N years no fire + Log(PI); (ii) N years no fire + Log(PI) + N years no fire × Log(PI). Community characteristic variation patterns depending on Log(PI) and N years no fire were analyzed using multiple linear regression. The statistical unit was the sample plot. The arithmetic mean was used as the characteristic of the central tendency; the error of the arithmetic mean or, where appropriate, the error of the standardized partial coefficient of multiple regression is given through the ± symbol.

3. Results

3.1. The Ratio of Results Obtained Using Traditional and New Classifications

Using estimates of the absolute projective cover of species groups with different dispersal modes, we investigated how the results of the two classifications correlate with each other (Figure 2). Similar variability was observed in projective covers of plants of the following groups (in all cases n = 77 and p < 0.0001): anemochores and Epilobium-type (r = 0.85); autochores and Allium-type (r = 0.97); zoochores and Cornus-type (r = 0.96); myrmecochores and Allium-type (r = 0.88).

3.2. Selection of a Combination of Predictors Explaining the Variability of Herb–Shrub Layer Diversity Estimates

We found that the parameter “Number of years since the last fire” was not the best predictor for the diversity characteristics of the herb–shrub layer (Table 2). For the majority of traits, the minimum AIC values were found for the pollution degree predictor. Therefore, Log(PI) is the optimal predictor in terms of quality/complexity to explain variability in many community diversity characteristics. However, for some of the functional diversity characteristics, the minimum AIC values were found for the combination of predictors N years no fire + Log(PI). For a small number of characteristics, minimum AIC values were found for the following combination including interaction between the predictors: N years no fire + Log(PI) + N years no fire × Log(PI).
Thus, the parameter “Number of years since the last fire” should not be completely excluded from the analysis when explaining the functional diversity of communities. It seems optimal to use the following combination of both predictors, but not including their interaction: N years no fire + Log(PI). This approach allowed us to use multiple regression to assess the direction and strength of the predictors’ influence.

3.3. Direction and Strength of Influence of N years no fire and Log(PI) on Diversity Parameters

The direction and strength of influence of the predictors N years no fire and Log(PI) on the community diversity parameters were judged by the values of the standardized partial coefficients of multiple regression (β). The overall quality of multiple regressions was judged by the value of R2adj (Table 3).
Standard characteristics of the herb–shrub and moss layers state—number of species, Shannon index and projective cover—depended only on the pollution level. The effects associated with pollution were significant at a high statistical level (in all cases p < 0.0001). The effects associated with the parameter “Number of years since the last fire” were not statistically significant. Pollution was associated with more than a half (58%–62%) of the total variability in the herb–shrub layer state characteristics and slightly less than a half (44%; this value of the coefficient of determination indicates a weak effect) of the variability in projective cover of epigeic mosses (Figure 3). As the heavy metal content in the forest floor increased, all characteristics of the herb–shrub and moss layers decreased, including the species richness and Shannon index value by 2–3 times; herb–shrub layer projective cover by 3–5 times; mosses projective cover by more than an order of magnitude, which is explained by the almost complete disappearance of ground mosses in the forests near the plant. Also, as pollution increased, the absolute projective cover of all groups of species distinguished by dispersal mode decreased.
The characteristics of functional diversity and the proportions of functional groups of species depended either solely on the pollution level or more strongly on the pollution level rather than on the time since the last fire. Species groups with different dispersal modes were sensitive to pollution to different extents. This is evident from the dynamics of CWM values. Using the traditional classification, a significant effect of pollution level dependence was found for CWM myrmecochores, but weak effects were found for CWM anemochores, CWM autochores, and CWM zoochores (Figure 4). However, even the weakest effects were statistically significant at the level of p < 0.05. As pollution increased, the participation of autochores (by 2–2.5 times) and myrmecochores (by contrast, by tens of times) in community formation decreased. At the same time, the participation of anemochores and zoochores increased by approximately 1.5 times. Using the new classification, statistically significant dynamics of CWM values were established for Allium-type, Cornus-type, and Epilobium-type species; however, for Cornus-type and Epilobium-type species, the effects were weak. (Figure 5). As pollution increased, the participation of Allium-type species in community formation decreased (by 3–4 times). At the same time, the participation of Cornus-type and Epilobium-type species increased by 1.7–2 times. The dynamics of CWM values for Bidens-type and Lycopodium-type species depending on the level of pollution were insignificant.
The effects on functional diversity characteristics associated with the time since the last fire were rare and statistically weak (p ≈ 0.04). Using the traditional classification, we found that the participation of zoochores in community formation increased during post-pyrogenic recovery. Using the new classification, as the post-fire period increased, the CWM of Cornus-type species increased as well.
The FAD and Rao’s quadratic entropy decreased with pollution and did not depend on the time since the last fire disturbance. At the same time, FAD and Rao were less determined by the predictors included in the multiple regression than species-based characteristics. The range of R2adj values for the FAD and Rao parameters was R2adj = 0.13–0.39, and for the number of species and the Shannon index, R2adj = 0.57–0.61.

3.4. The Ratio of Species Groups with Different Diaspore Dispersal Distances in Connection with Pollution

Dispersal syndromes identified according to the traditional classification can be ranked by diaspore dispersal distance. Although there is a controversy about the actual seed dispersal distances in forests [6], we assumed that different syndromes can be characterized by the following approximate dispersal distances for most seeds [5,6]:
-
Autochores and myrmecochores—seeds disperse not far, from tens of centimeters to tens of meters;
-
Anemochores and zoochores—seeds disperse far, from tens to hundreds of meters, possibly further.
The type of dependencies in Figure 4 suggests that under pollution conditions, the contribution to community formation of species dispersing over long distances increases while the total CWM of species dispersing over short distances decreases. We tested this hypothesis by running multiple regression analyses for the “autochores + myrmecochores” and “anemochores + zoochores” groups (Table 4). Our assumption was confirmed: the CWM of the “anemochores + zoochores” group increased as pollution increased (Figure 6a), while the CWM of the “autochores + myrmecochores” group decreased.
It should be noted that simultaneous analysis of the combined groups “anemochores + zoochores” and “autochores + myrmecochores” is redundant since theoretically, their CWM is related by the following ratio:
CWM (anemochores + zoochores) = 1 − CWM (autochores + myrmecochores).
But this relationship is not fulfilled exactly because dispersal syndromes are not known for all species. Since the syndromes for some species are unknown, the multiple regression results for these groups are not completely symmetrical.

3.5. The Ratio of Species Groups with Different Diaspore Dispersal Agents in Relation to the Time Since the Last Fire Disturbances

Using traditional classification, dispersal syndromes can be ranked not only by the seed dispersal distance but also by the agents responsible for it. We identified two groups of dispersal mechanisms as shown below:
-
Seeds are dispersed without animals—anemochores and autochores;
-
Seeds are dispersed by invertebrates and vertebrates—myrmecochores and zoochores.
The analysis of β-coefficients characterizing the dependence of the CWM of species groups in connection with the time since the last fire suggested that during post-pyrogenic recovery, the CWM of anemochores and autochores decreases, while the CWM of myrmecochores and zoochores, respectively, increases. We tested this hypothesis using multiple regression (see Table 4). Our assumption was confirmed. The CWM groups allocated by seed dispersal agents did not depend on pollution but were related to the time since the last fire. The CWM of the “anemochores + autochores” group decreased during post-fire recovery (Figure 6b), while the CWM of the “myrmecochores + zoochores” group increased accordingly. Judging by the determination coefficient values, the pyrogenic dynamics of the CWM of species groups dispersing with different agents was very weak, although statistically significant.

4. Discussion

Both working hypotheses were only partially confirmed. The aspects related to the effects of technogenic pollution were found to be correct. In polluted forests, the functional diversity of the herb–shrub layer was lower compared to unpolluted forests, while the presence of anemochoric species was higher. General diversity characteristics did not depend on the time since the last fire, but we found a slight increase in the participation of animal-dispersed species as post-fire recovery progressed. According to our estimates, traditional diversity measures that do not take into account species heterogeneity—the number of species and the Shannon index—were more sensitive and changed significantly as pollution increased compared to the parameters that take into account species heterogeneity in dispersal modes. This is explained by the functional duplication of taxa. A similar pattern of functional diversity relative stability was found when studying the drought effects [52]. However, sometimes, functional diversity is as sensitive as traditional diversity measures [53,54].

4.1. Impact of Pollution

Under the influence of heavy metal pollution, the herb–shrub layer communities changed significantly. This is evident from the sharp decrease in taxonomic diversity near the factory similar to what is usually observed near industrial enterprises [17,20,21,22,23]. It is important to consider that technogenic changes in functional diversity and ratios of groups of species with different diaspore dispersal modes occurred along with a drastic decrease in plant abundance. Therefore, we tend to explain the increase in the contribution of anemochore and zoochore species to the community formation observed under pollution by the fact that autochores and myrmecochores are more sensitive to pollution impact, while anemochores and zoochores are less sensitive, i.e., relatively more resistant. The similar resistance of anemochores in forests under polymetallic pollution was demonstrated in the vicinity of another factory in the Urals [32].
The response of some groups identified by their dispersal mode is partly understandable. For example, ant diversity and abundance decrease in forests near the KCS [55]. Although the study [55] was conducted in birch forests and included observations in areas with heavily damaged vegetation, it can be assumed that the deteriorated state of ant communities due to pollution may be one of the reasons for the lower distribution of myrmecochorous herbs. The increased CWM of anemochores in polluted forests may reflect not only changes in the forest environment, but also the transformation of adjacent non-forest areas. In the KCS area, fragments of forest ecosystems alternate with heavily anthropogenically transformed industrial, agricultural and residential areas. This environment is a likely source of seeds of edge species capable of long-range dispersal [4]. In general, high abundance of species with long seed dispersal distances, including anemochores, may be a sign of disturbance of the ecosystems themselves or their environment [4,32,33].
The established relative resistance of anemochores and zoochores to pollution allowed us to suggest that species survival near the KCS may be related to the diaspore dispersal distance. It is possible that under pollution, when survival of individuals is hampered by toxic substrates, the maintenance of local populations depends on a constant flow of diaspores from less disturbed habitats. A strong decrease in the number of seedlings from soil seed banks was found earlier in this pollution gradient [56]. In this study [56], it was found that the number of seedlings from the soil seed bank decreased by 5–8 times under conditions of severe pollution, while the proportion of dicotyledons in the total number of seedlings increased. However, connection between the number of seedlings and the parameter “Number of years since the last fire” could not be established. This supports the hypothesis that a constant influx of seeds from distant habitats is important for the stable existence of species under pollution.

4.2. Impact of Fires

The direction and strength of fire impact on plant communities depend on the severity of fires and, accordingly, on the degree of post-fire disturbances [24,25,26]. We assessed the consequences of low-intensity ground fires in which trees and forest stands did not die. The consequences of such fires were not detected by standard geobotanical characteristics. We found no relationship between the time since the last fire disturbances and community diversity and the overall abundance of the herb–shrub layer. Similar conclusions of no change in plant diversity in response to fire disturbance have been observed in some studies [25,28,29], although a decrease in plant diversity was observed about as often after fires [24,26,27].
It is therefore unexpected that the ratio of species groups dispersed by different agents, although not strongly, changed in a direction depending on the time since the last fire. During post-fire succession, the CWM of zoochores in the broad sense increased including species with diaspores dispersed by vertebrates and invertebrates. In general, different plant species are known to be differentially resistant to fire disturbance and therefore affected by fire in different ways [28,29]. This is the basis for distinguishing such groups as pyrophytic, early- and late-successional species. Our data showed that one of the traits differentiating herbs in post-fire succession may be the degree of adaptation to seed dispersal by animals. The established increase in the importance of zoochory is a common feature in post-fire succession of the herb–shrub layer of pine forests and in restoration successions of tropical forests [3,12]. This similarity allows us to cautiously suggest that the pattern of successional strengthening of zoochorous planta is a general pattern reproduced in different biomes and in different succession types.

4.3. The Correspondence Between “Dispersal Syndromes” and “Dispersal Strategies”

The four dispersal syndromes used according to the traditional classification had closely varying analogs among the six dispersal strategies identified according to the new classification. This is understandable since we have classified the same set of species using two approaches. The list of partial flora species of pine forests is rather small. The basis of a particular syndrome/strategy’s projective cover is often created by one, two or several abundant species. For example, common abundant anemochores and Epilobium-type species were Calamagrostis arundinacea (L.) Roth (the most common species of the herb–shrub layer) and Chamaenerion angustifolium (L.) Scop. (a typical and sometimes common species in areas disturbed by fire). A common abundant species of autochora and Allium-type is Brachypodium pinnatum (L.) Beauv. Commonly abundant zoochoric and Cornus-type species are the dominant or common species Polygonatum odoratum (Mill.) Druce, Rubus saxatilis L. and Vaccinium vitis-idaea L. Close coincidence of the different functional groups’ dynamics can be shown not only by calculating the correlation coefficients, as shown above. We can see that similarly varying groups had similar changes in value in the condition gradient. For example, as pollution increased, the CWM of both anemochores and Epilobium-type, as well as zoochores and Cornus-type, increased as well. On the contrary, the CWM of both autochores and Allium-type decreased significantly as pollution increased.

5. Conclusions

We used elements of functional diversity analysis and two classifications of plant dispersal modes to understand whether the characteristics of diaspore dispersal are associated with technogenic and fire disturbances of the herb–shrub layer of pine forests in the Southern Urals. We found strong changes in the contributions of species with different seed dispersal modes depending on heavy metal pollution. In polluted forests, the importance of species with a long-distance diaspore dispersal—anemochores and zoochores—increased. This result suggests the need for a special study of the significance of long-distance diaspore dispersal as a probably underestimated factor in the community structure formation under severe technogenic disturbances.
The effects associated with fire disturbances were weaker than those associated with pollution. However, we found that zoochores in the broad sense, including species with diaspores dispersed by vertebrates and invertebrates, increased in importance during post-fire succession. This result seems important to us for two reasons. First, we found no relation with the time since the last fire for traditional community diversity characteristics not considering functional differences between species. We also found no relation with the time since the last fire for soil seed bank parameters [56] and for functional diversity parameters based on Grime’s ecological strategies [57]. But the dispersal modes, although not by much, changed with the time passed since the last fire. Consequently, the characteristics of seed dispersal probably determine the positions of herb species in the post-fire habitat mosaic in the Southern Urals taiga. Second, the increase in the importance of animals in seed dispersal in the post-fire succession of the herb–shrub layer in pine forests closely coincides with the well-known pattern of the increase in the abundance of zoochorous plants in restoration successions in tropical forests. Therefore, it is possible that the information on plant–animal interactions can provide valuable data about the succession mechanisms in taiga forests, which have been studied less than succession in tropical and subtropical regions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.V. and N.K.; Methodology, D.V., N.K. and D.Z.; Formal Analysis, D.V. and D.Z.; Investigation, N.K., D.Z. and A.M.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, D.V.; Writing—Review and Editing, D.V., N.K., A.M. and D.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was funded by the Russian Science Foundation Project no. 23−24-10055, which was financed by the Russian Science Foundation and the Government of the Chelyabinsk Region (https://rscf.ru/project/23-24-10055/ accessed on 1 December 2024).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Willson, M.F.; Traveset, A. The ecology of seed dispersal. In Seeds: The Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities, 2nd ed.; Fenner, M., Ed.; CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK, 2000; Chapter 4; pp. 85–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Huanca Nuñez, N.; Chazdon, R.L.; Russo, S.E. Seed rain–successional feedbacks in wet tropical forests. Ecology 2021, 102, e03362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wendt, A.L.; Chazdon, R.L.; Ramirez, O.V. Successional trajectories of seed dispersal mode and seed size of canopy tree species in wet tropical forests. Front. For. Glob. Chang. 2022, 5, 946541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Treep, J.; de Jager, M.; Bartumeus, F.; Soons, M.B. Seed dispersal as a search strategy: Dynamic and fragmented landscapes select for multi-scale movement strategies in plants. Mov. Ecol. 2021, 9, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Vittoz, P.; Engler, R. Seed dispersal distances: A typology based on dispersal modes and plant traits. Bot. Helv. 2007, 117, 109–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lososová, Z.; Axmanová, I.; Chytrý, M.; Midolo, G.; Abdulhak, S.; Karger, D.N.; Renaud, J.; Van Es, J.; Vittoz, P.; Thuiller, W. Seed dispersal distance classes and dispersal modes for the European flora. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2023, 32, 1485–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. McClanahan, T.R. The effect of a seed source on primary succession in a forest ecosystem. Vegetatio 1986, 65, 175–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Duncan, R.S.; Chapman, C.A. Seed dispersal and potential forest succession in abandoned agriculture in tropical Africa. Ecol. Appl. 1999, 9, 998–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dovčiak, M.; Frelich, L.E.; Reich, P.B. Pathways in old-field succession to white pine: Seed rain, shade, and climate effects. Ecol. Monogr. 2005, 75, 363–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Reid, J.L.; Holl, K.D. Arrival ≠ Survival. Restor. Ecol. 2013, 21, 153–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yang, X.; Yan, C.; Zhao, Q.; Holyoak, M.; Fortuna, M.A.; Bascompte, J.; Jansen, P.A.; Zhang, Z. Ecological succession drives the structural change of seed-rodent interaction networks in fragmented forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 2018, 419–420, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dent, D.H.; Estrada-Villegas, S. Uniting niche differentiation and dispersal limitation predicts tropical forest succession. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2021, 36, 700–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Coomes, D.A.; Grubb, P.J. Colonization, tolerance, competition and seed-size variation within functional groups. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2003, 18, 283–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Palma, A.C.; Goosem, M.; Fensham, R.J.; Goosem, S.; Preece, N.D.; Stevenson, P.R.; Laurance, S.G.W. Dispersal and recruitment limitations in secondary forests. J. Veg. Sci. 2021, 32, e12975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Benedicto-Royuela, J.; Costa, J.M.; Heleno, R.; Silva, J.S.; Freitas, H.; Lopes, P.; Mendes, S.B.; Timóteo, S. What is the value of biotic seed dispersal in post-fire forest regeneration? Conserv. Lett. 2023, 17, e12990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dehaudt, B.; Bruce, T.; Deblauwe, V.; Ferraz, A.; Gardner, B.; Bibila, T.G.B.; LeBreton, M.; Mempong, G.; Njabo, K.; Nkengbeza, S.N.; et al. Divergent seed dispersal outcomes: Interactions between seed, disperser, and forest traits. Ecology 2024, 105, e4409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kozlov, M.V.; Zvereva, E.L.; Zverev, V.E. Impacts of Point Polluters on Terrestrial Biota; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands; Heidelberg, Germany; London, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  18. Chibilev, A.A.; Veselkin, D.V.; Kuyantseva, N.B.; Chashchina, O.E.; Dubinin, A.E. Dynamics of forest fires and climate in Ilmen nature reserve, 1948–2013. Dokl. Earth Sci. 2016, 468, 619–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Veselkin, D.; Pustovalova, L.; Kuyantseva, N.; Mumber, A. Trends in forest fire occurrence in the Ilmensky nature reserve, Southern Urals, Russia, between 1948 and 2014. Forests 2022, 13, 528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zvereva, E.L.; Toivonen, E.; Kozlov, M.V. Changes in species richness of vascular plants under the impact of air pollution: A global perspective. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2007, 17, 305–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chernenkova, T.V.; Kabirov, R.R.; Basova, E.V. Regeneration successions of northern taiga spruce forests under reduction of aerotechnogenic impact. Contemp. Probl. Ecol. 2011, 4, 742–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chernenkova, T.V. Biodiversity of forest vegetation under industrial pollution. Russ. J. Ecol. 2014, 45, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Trubina, M.R.; Vorobeichik, E.L.; Khantemirova, E.V.; Bergman, I.E.; Kaigorodova, S.Y. Dynamics of forest vegetation after the reduction of industrial emissions: Fast recovery or continued degradation? Dokl. Biol. Sci. 2014, 458, 302–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Richter, C.; Rejmánek, M.; Miller, J.E.D.; Welch, K.R.; Weeks, J.; Safford, H. The species diversity × fire severity relationship is hump-shaped in semiarid yellow pine and mixed conifer forests. Ecosphere 2019, 10, e02882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Strand, E.K.; Satterberg, K.L.; Hudak, A.T.; Byrne, J.; Khalyani, A.H.; Smith, A.M.S. Does burn severity affect plant community diversity and composition in mixed conifer forests of the United States Intermountain West one decade post fire? Fire Ecol. 2019, 15, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Geraskina, A.P.; Tebenkova, D.N.; Ershov, D.V.; Ruchinskaya, E.V.; Sibirtseva, N.V.; Lukina, N.V. Wildfires as a factor of the loss of biodiversity and functions of forest ecosystems. For. Sci. Issues 2021, 4, 82, (In Russian with English Abstract). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kovaleva, N.M.; Ivanova, G.A. Recovery of ground vegetation at the initial stage of fire succession. Contemp. Probl. Ecol. 2013, 6, 162–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Braslavskaya, T.Y.; Geraskina, A.P.; Aleinikov, A.A.; Sibgatullin, R.Z.; Belyaeva, N.V.; Ukhova, N.L.; Korotkov, V.N.; Shilov, D.S.; Lugovaya, D.L.; Smirnova, O.V. Long-term effect of wildfires on vascular plant and soil invertebrate diversity in primary fir-spruce forests of the Ural Mountains (North Eurasia). Russ. J. Ecosyst. Ecol. 2022, 7, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Eales, J.; Haddaway, N.R.; Bernes, C.; Cooke, S.J.; Jonsson, B.G.; Kouki, J.; Petrokofsky, G.; Taylor, J.J. What is the effect of prescribed burning in temperate and boreal forest on biodiversity, beyond pyrophilous and saproxylic species? A systematic review. Environ. Evid. 2018, 7, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cote, J.; Bestion, E.; Jacob, S.; Travis, J.; Legrand, D.; Baguette, M. Evolution of dispersal strategies and dispersal syndromes in fragmented landscapes. Ecography 2017, 40, 56–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Warneke, C.R.; Caughlin, T.T.; Damschen, E.I.; Haddad, N.M.; Levey, D.J.; Brudvig, L.A. Habitat fragmentation alters the distance of abiotic seed dispersal through edge effects and direction of dispersal. Ecology 2022, 103, e03586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Trubina, M.R. Vulnerability to copper smelter emissions in species of the herb–dwarf shrub layer: Role of differences in the type of diaspore dispersal. Russ. J. Ecol. 2020, 51, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Howe, H.F.; Smallwood, J. Ecology of seed dispersal. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1982, 13, 201–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Céspedes, B.; Torres, I.; Luna, B.; Pérez, B.; Moreno, J.M. Soil seed bank, fire season, and temporal patterns of germination in a seeder-dominated Mediterranean shrubland. Plant Ecol. 2012, 213, 383–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hartnett, D.C.; Richardson, D.R. Population biology of Bonamia grandiflora (Convolvulaceae): Effects of fire on plant and seed bank dynamics. Am. J. Bot. 1989, 76, 361–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lamont, B.B.; Runciman, H.V. Fire may stimulate flowering, branching, seed production and seedling establishment in two kangaroo paws (Haemodoraceae). J. Appl. Ecol. 1993, 30, 256–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Beck, H.E.; Zimmermann, N.E.; McVicar, T.R.; Vergopolan, N.; Berg, A.; Wood, E.F. Present and future Köppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution. Sci. Data 2018, 5, 180214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Usoltsev, V.A.; Vorobeychik, E.L.; Bergman, I.E. Biological Productiviti of Ural Forests under Conditions of Air Pollutions: An Investigation of a System of Regularities; Ural’skiy Gosudarstvennyy Lesotekhnicheskiy Universitet: Yekaterinburg, Russia, 2012. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  39. Mikryukov, V.S.; Dulya, O.V.; Vorobeichik, E.L. Diversity and spatial structure of soil fungi and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in forest litter contaminated with copper smelter emissions. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2015, 226, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mikryukov, V.S.; Dulya, O.V. Contamination-induced transformation of bacterial and fungal communities in spruce-fir and birch forest litter. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2017, 114, 111–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Veselkin, D.V.; Chashchina, O.E.; Kuyantseva, N.B.; Mumber, A.G. Stable carbon and nitrogen isotopes in woody plants and herbs near the large copper smelting plant. Geochem. Int. 2019, 57, 575–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Veselkin, D.; Kuyantseva, N.; Mumber, A.; Molchanova, D.; Kiseleva, D. δ15N in birch and pine leaves in the vicinity of a large copper smelter indicating a change in the conditions of their soil nutrition. Forests 2022, 13, 1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Plants of the World Online. Available online: https://powo.science.kew.org (accessed on 9 July 2024).
  44. Ovesnov, S.A.; Efimik, E.G. Biodiversity and Ecology of Higher Plants: Textbook. Study Guide; Perm State University: Perm, Russia, 2009. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  45. Dronin, G.V.; Rakov, N.S. Ecological and florogenetic aspects of coenoflora of pine forest near village Staroe Chirkovo (Ulyanovsk Pre-Volga region). Phytodiversity East. Eur. 2013, 7, 29–62. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  46. Levina, R.E. Means of Dispersal of Fruits and Seeds; Moscow State University: Moscow, Russia, 1957. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  47. Sádlo, J.; Chytrý, M.; Pergl, J.; Pyšek, P. Plant dispersal strategies: A new classification based on themultiple dispersal modes of individual species. Preslia 2018, 90, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Pladias—Database of the Czech Flora and Vegetation. Available online: www.pladias.cz (accessed on 24 July 2024).
  49. Casanoves, F.; Pla, L.; Di Rienzo, J.A.; Díaz, S. FDiversity: A software package for the integrated analysis of functional diversity. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2011, 2, 233–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Du Laing, G. Analysis and fractionation of trace elements in soils. In Trace Elements in Soils; Hooda, P.S., Ed.; Wiley: Chichester, UK, 2010; Chapter 4; pp. 53–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Vorobeychik, E.L.; Sadykov, O.F.; Farafontov, M.G. Ecological Standardization of Terrestrial Ecosystems Technogenic Pollution (Local Scale); Nauka: Yekaterinburg, Russia, 1994. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  52. Copeland, S.M.; Harrison, S.P.; Latimer, A.M.; Damschen, E.I.; Eskelinen, A.M.; Fernandez-Going, B.; Spasojevic, M.J.; Anacker, B.L.; Thorne, J.H. Ecological effects of extreme drought on Californian herbaceous plant communities. Ecol. Monogr. 2016, 86, 295–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Mikryukov, V.S.; Vorobeichik, E.L.; Mikhailova, I.N. Variation of the epiphytic lichen diversity in a gradient of atmospheric pollution: Do taxonomic, genetic, and functional distances between species add any information? Dokl. Biol. Sci. 2014, 454, 22–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Li, H.; Luo, P.; Yang, H.; Luo, C.; Xie, W.; Jia, H.; Cheng, Y.; Huang, Y. Assessing the effect of roads on mountain plant diversity beyond species richness. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 985673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Belskaya, E.; Gilev, A.; Trubina, M.; Belskii, E. Diversity of ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) along a heavy metal pollution gradient: Evidence of a hump-shaped effect. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 106, 105447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kuyantseva, N.B.; Molchanova, D.A.; Mumber, A.G.; Veselkin, D.V. The number of seedlings from the soil seed bank of pine forests with differently dated fires near the Karabash copper smelter. Russ. J. Ecol. 2024, 55, 241–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zharkova, D.A.; Kuyantseva, N.B.; Mumber, A.G.; Veselkin, D.V. Changes in the diversity of the herb-shrub layer of pine forests caused by severe pollution and fire disturbances in the Southern Urals. Biol. Bull. 2024; in print. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The area of research with locations of sample plots. Note: Red dots—sample plots, dotter boxed—ISR borders.
Figure 1. The area of research with locations of sample plots. Note: Red dots—sample plots, dotter boxed—ISR borders.
Forests 15 02161 g001
Figure 2. Similarity dendrogram of projective cover variability of species groups with different dispersal syndromes/strategies.
Figure 2. Similarity dendrogram of projective cover variability of species groups with different dispersal syndromes/strategies.
Forests 15 02161 g002
Figure 3. Changes in species richness (a), diversity (b) and projective cover (c) of the herb–shrub layer and projective cover of epigeic mosses (d) with increasing pollution. The determination coefficient values are shown for straight line approximation.
Figure 3. Changes in species richness (a), diversity (b) and projective cover (c) of the herb–shrub layer and projective cover of epigeic mosses (d) with increasing pollution. The determination coefficient values are shown for straight line approximation.
Forests 15 02161 g003
Figure 4. Changes in CWM of species groups with different dispersal syndromes according to the traditional classification: anemochores (a), autochores (b), zoochores (c) and myrmecochores (d) with increasing pollution. The determination coefficient values are shown for straight line approximation.
Figure 4. Changes in CWM of species groups with different dispersal syndromes according to the traditional classification: anemochores (a), autochores (b), zoochores (c) and myrmecochores (d) with increasing pollution. The determination coefficient values are shown for straight line approximation.
Forests 15 02161 g004
Figure 5. Changes in CWM of species groups with different dispersal strategies according to the new classification: Allium-type (a), Cornus-type (b), Epilobium-type (c) and и Lycopodium-type (d) with increasing pollution. The determination coefficient values are shown for straight line approximation.
Figure 5. Changes in CWM of species groups with different dispersal strategies according to the new classification: Allium-type (a), Cornus-type (b), Epilobium-type (c) and и Lycopodium-type (d) with increasing pollution. The determination coefficient values are shown for straight line approximation.
Forests 15 02161 g005
Figure 6. Change in the CWM of the “anemochores + zoochores” group depending on pollution level (a) and change in the CWM of the “myrmecochores + zoochores” group depending on the time since the last fire (b). The determination coefficient values are shown for straight line approximation.
Figure 6. Change in the CWM of the “anemochores + zoochores” group depending on pollution level (a) and change in the CWM of the “myrmecochores + zoochores” group depending on the time since the last fire (b). The determination coefficient values are shown for straight line approximation.
Forests 15 02161 g006
Table 1. Number of species, average projective cover and examples of species with different dispersal syndromes according to the traditional classification and with different dispersal strategies according to the new classification.
Table 1. Number of species, average projective cover and examples of species with different dispersal syndromes according to the traditional classification and with different dispersal strategies according to the new classification.
Dispersal
Syndrome/Strategy
Total Number of
Species
Mean Value per Relevé in the Entire Set of 77
Relevés (±SE)
Typical Representatives
CoverCWM
Dispersal syndromes according to traditional classification
Anemochores 5817.6 ± 1.80.32 ± 0.02Calamagrostis arundinacea (L.) Roth, Sanguisorba officinalis L., Orthilia secunda (L.) House, Lilium pilosiusculum (Freyn) Miscz.
Autochores7116.9 ± 2.10.16 ± 0.01Brachypodium pinnatum (L.) Beauv., Stachys officinalis (L.) Trevis., Lathyrus pisiformis L., Trifolium medium L., Seseli libanotis (L.) Koch, Vicia cracca L., Geranium pseudosibiricum J. Mayer.
Zoochores1618.7 ± 1.60.41 ± 0.03Galium boreale L., Vaccinium myrtillus L., Polygonatum odoratum (Mill.) Druce, Rubus saxatilis L., Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.
Myrmecochores 138.3 ± 1.30.08 ± 0.01Luzula pilosa (L.) Willd., Carex montana L., Pulmonaria mollis Wulfen ex Hornem.
Dispersal strategies under the new classification
Allium-type9128.9 ± 3.60.33 ± 0.03Adenophora lilifolia (L.) A. DC., Brachypodium pinnatum (L.) Beauv., Galium boreale L., Sanguisorba officinalis L.
Bidens-type30.2 ± 0.10.002 ± 0.001Agrimonia pilosa Ledeb., Geum rivale L., Geum urbanum L.
Cornus-type816.1 ± 1.30.39 ± 0.03Polygonatum odoratum (Mill.) Druce, Rubus saxatilis L., Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.
Epilobium-type159.2 ± 1.20.19 ± 0.02Calamagrostis arundinacea (L.) Roth, Hieracium umbellatum L., Trommsdorffia maculata (L.) Bernh.
Lycopodium-type194.8 ± 0.70.09 ± 0.01Orthilia secunda (L.) House, Pyrola rotundifolia L., Chimaphila umbellata (L.) W.P.C. Barton, Pteridium aquilinum (L.) Kuhn.
Table 2. AIC values for different combinations of predictors explaining the variability of herb–shrub and moss layer state characteristics, as well as functional diversity characteristics of herb–shrub layer determined by dispersal modes. Gray-blue shading indicates minimum AIC values in each row.
Table 2. AIC values for different combinations of predictors explaining the variability of herb–shrub and moss layer state characteristics, as well as functional diversity characteristics of herb–shrub layer determined by dispersal modes. Gray-blue shading indicates minimum AIC values in each row.
CharacteristicsNumber of Years Since the Last Fire—N years no firePollution Index—Log(PI)Predictor Combination
Without Interaction: N years no fire + Log(PI)with Interaction: N years no fire + Log(PI) + N years no fire × Log(PI)
State characteristics of the herb–shrub and moss layers
Number of species of the herb–shrub layer per 400 m2624.81560.84562.83564.81
Shannon index193.57120.47122.39123.99
Projective cover of
   Herb–shrub layer709.98646.13648.13650.12
   epigeic mosses754.96710.67705.72706.91
Functional diversity: dispersal syndromes according to the traditional classification
Projective cover of species groups
   Anemochores648.16624.16623.75623.93
   Autochores669.34608.86609.06607.81
   Zoochores624.68540.41541.23542.68
   Myrmecochores589.15534.79536.35538.29
CWM
   Anemochores−30.41−31.48−33.24−31.28
   Autochores−91.60−110.74−109.01−111.90
   Zoochores9.720.55−3.06−1.42
   Myrmecochores−148.42−208.07−206.09−204.13
FAD233.57199.86200.10200.63
Rao’s quadratic entropy−33.15−68.71−67.87−67.72
Functional diversity: dispersal strategies according to the new classification
Projective cover of species groups
   Allium-type753.03683.76684.76684.88
   Bidens-type241.53243.38236.97236.97
   Cornus-type596.04531.02532.13533.26
   Epilobium-type573.61568.95566.38548.30
   Lycopodium-type508.26495.18497.12498.31
CWM
   Allium-type7.54−45.84−43.88−47.16
   Bidens-type−495.24−493.16−499.06−499.06
   Cornus-type16.562.27−1.94−0.31
   Epilobium-type−42.00−42.75−44.21−42.26
   Lycopodium-type−113.66−115.00−113.28−112.69
FAD151.23132.24133.87135.55
Rao’s quadratic entropy−31.48−43.90−41.91−41.89
Table 3. Parameters of multiple linear regression equations describing the dependence of herb–shrub and moss layer state characteristics, as well as functional diversity characteristics of herb–shrub layer according to the time since the last fire and pollution level. Gray shading indicates cases of significant influence of predictors.
Table 3. Parameters of multiple linear regression equations describing the dependence of herb–shrub and moss layer state characteristics, as well as functional diversity characteristics of herb–shrub layer according to the time since the last fire and pollution level. Gray shading indicates cases of significant influence of predictors.
CharacteristicsNumber of Years Since
the Last Fire—N years no fire
Pollution Index—
Log(PI)
R2adj
β ± SEpβ ± SEp
State characteristics of the herb–shrub and moss layers
Number of species of the herb–shrub layer per 400 m2−0.016 ± 0.0760.8361−0.764 ± 0.076<0.00010.57
Shannon index−0.035 ± 0.0720.6271−0.790 ± 0.072<0.00010.61
Projective cover of
   Herb–shrub layer−0.020 ± 0.0740.7841−0.776 ± 0.074<0.00010.59
   epigeic mosses0.146 ± 0.0860.0937−0.647 ± 0.086<0.00010.45
Functional diversity: dispersal syndromes according to the traditional classification
Projective cover of species groups
   Anemochores−0.193 ± 0.0960.0475−0.571 ± 0.096<0.00010.32
   Autochores−0.015 ± 0.0770.8497−0.759 ± 0.077<0.00010.56
   Zoochores0.078 ± 0.0650.2351−0.818 ± 0.065<0.00010.68
   Myrmecochores0.012 ± 0.0800.8795−0.733 ± 0.080<0.00010.53
CWM
   Anemochores−0.215 ± 0.1100.05420.244 ± 0.1100.02970.10
   Autochores−0.130 ± 0.1020.2070−0.491 ± 0.102<0.00010.22
   Zoochores0.222 ± 0.1060.03910.403 ± 0.1060.00030.17
   Myrmecochores−0.001 ± 0.0760.9942−0.763 ± 0.076<0.00010.57
FAD0.129 ± 0.0900.1579−0.609 ± 0.090<0.00010.39
Rao’s quadratic entropy0.115 ± 0.0900.2039−0.615 ± 0.090<0.00010.39
Functional diversity: dispersal strategies according to the new classification
Projective cover of species groups
   Allium-type−0.024 ± 0.0720.7410−0.795 ± 0.072<0.00010.62
   Bidens-type0.175 ± 0.1120.1233−0.201 ± 0.1120.07730.06
   Cornus-type0.089 ± 0.0740.2325−0.758 ± 0.074<0.00010.59
   Epilobium-type−0.264 ± 0.1060.0151−0.368 ± 0.1060.00090.16
   Lycopodium-type0.012 ± 0.1060.9077−0.416 ± 0.1060.00020.15
CWM
   Allium-type−0.109 ± 0.0810.1852−0.725 ± 0.081<0.00010.50
   Bidens-type0.172 ± 0.1130.1304−0.195 ± 0.1130.08700.05
   Cornus-type0.218 ± 0.1020.03570.496 ± 0.102<0.00010.22
   Epilobium-type−0.198 ± 0.1110.07840.227 ± 0.1110.04420.08
   Lycopodium-type0.036 ± 0.1160.75530.133 ± 0.1160.25610.01
FAD0.064 ± 0.1020.5308−0.474 ± 0.102<0.00010.22
Rao’s quadratic entropy0.010 ± 0.1080.9279−0.391 ± 0.1080.00050.13
Table 4. Parameters of multiple linear regression equations describing the dependence of the CWM of functional species groups with different distances and seed dispersal agents by the time since the last fire and pollution level. Gray shading indicates cases of significant influence of predictors.
Table 4. Parameters of multiple linear regression equations describing the dependence of the CWM of functional species groups with different distances and seed dispersal agents by the time since the last fire and pollution level. Gray shading indicates cases of significant influence of predictors.
CharacteristicsNumber of Years Since
the Last Fire–N years no fire
Pollution Index—
Log(PI)
R2adj
β ± SEpβ ± SEp
CWM of functional groups with different seed dispersal distances
   Autochores + myrmecochores−0.090 ± 0.0840.2872−0.704 ± 0.084<0.00010.47
   Anemochores + zoochores0.064 ± 0.0820.43770.717 ± 0.082<0.00010.49
CWM of functional groups with different seed dispersal agents
   Autochores + anemochores −0.265 ± 0.1130.0219−0.068 ± 0.1130.55130.05
   Myrmecochores + zoochores0.244 ± 0.1130.03420.146 ± 0.1130.20070.05
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Veselkin, D.; Kuyantseva, N.; Mumber, A.; Zharkova, D. Significant Shifts in Predominant Plant Dispersal Modes in Pine Forests of the Southern Urals (Russia): Responses to Technogenic Pollution and Ground Fires. Forests 2024, 15, 2161. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15122161

AMA Style

Veselkin D, Kuyantseva N, Mumber A, Zharkova D. Significant Shifts in Predominant Plant Dispersal Modes in Pine Forests of the Southern Urals (Russia): Responses to Technogenic Pollution and Ground Fires. Forests. 2024; 15(12):2161. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15122161

Chicago/Turabian Style

Veselkin, Denis, Nadezhda Kuyantseva, Aleksandr Mumber, and Darya Zharkova. 2024. "Significant Shifts in Predominant Plant Dispersal Modes in Pine Forests of the Southern Urals (Russia): Responses to Technogenic Pollution and Ground Fires" Forests 15, no. 12: 2161. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15122161

APA Style

Veselkin, D., Kuyantseva, N., Mumber, A., & Zharkova, D. (2024). Significant Shifts in Predominant Plant Dispersal Modes in Pine Forests of the Southern Urals (Russia): Responses to Technogenic Pollution and Ground Fires. Forests, 15(12), 2161. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15122161

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop