Review Reports

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In my opinion the manuscript is interested and the authors write it very well and provide the most valuable information in the study. All my comments you will find in the attached revised version of your manuscript. Hope my submitting comments are helpful for improving the manuscript.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

We're grateful and appreciate you taking the time to share your rating with us.

The response will be placed immediately after each question /or suggestion in blue color.

In our review, all the questions and modification requests were entirely addressed. If any clarification or modification is required, we will be pleased to perform it back,

Kind regards,

The authors

 

 

 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

This is a very interesting and meaningful work. In this study, the 3-PG model was applied to the calculation of carbon sequestration of Cedrus atlantica ((Endl.) Manetti ex Carrière, and the parameters were optimized and the model was verified, which proved the reliability of the method. However, some details still need to be improved.

(1) What is the size of the sample plot?

(2) How can the results of parameter sensitivity analysis be applied to parameter optimization?

(3) It is necessary to discuss the inheritance and innovation between the results of this method and other existing research results.

Author Response

We're grateful and appreciate you taking the time to share your rating with us.

The response will be placed immediately after each question /or suggestion in blue color.

All the three questions were thoroughtly adressed in our review. If any additional clarification or modification is required we will pleased to perform it.

Kind regards

The authors

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

We're grateful and appreciate you taking the time to share your rating with us.

The response will be placed immediately after each question /or suggestion in blue color.

In our review, all the questions were thoroughly addressed. If any additional clarifications or modifications are required we will be pleased to readdress them back,

Kind regards

The authors

 

 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

Thank you for your revisions. They have helped improve your manuscript. Not all the information you presented in your cover letter appeared in the text. This information is important for readers to understand your research. Please add it to the manuscript.

Thank you for your efforts in this research field. Your contributions are valuable and I look forward to reading more of your work.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

We're grateful and appreciate you taking the time to share your rating with us.

The response will be placed immediately after each question /or suggestion in red color.

We will be also pleased and available to consider any further remark or orientation,

Cordially,

The authors

 

 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx