Next Article in Journal
Influence of the Conditioning Method for Pre-Sintered Zirconia on the Shear Bond Strength of Bilayered Porcelain/Zirconia
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Activity of Different Antibiotics Enhanced with Silver-Doped Hydroxyapatite Thin Films
Previous Article in Journal
Operation of Thin-Film Electrolyte Metal-Supported Solid Oxide Fuel Cells in Lightweight and Stationary Stacks: Material and Microstructural Aspects
Previous Article in Special Issue
Preparation of Nanofibrous Structure of Mesoporous Bioactive Glass Microbeads for Biomedical Applications
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 9
Issue 9
10.3390/ma9090763
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Novel Osteointegrative Sr-Substituted Apatitic Cements Enriched with Alginate

by
Simone Sprio
1,*,
Massimiliano Dapporto
1,
Monica Montesi
1,
Silvia Panseri
1,
Wanda Lattanzi
2,3,
Enrico Pola
4,
Giandomenico Logroscino
4 and
Anna Tampieri
1
1
Institute of Science and Technology for Ceramics, National Research Council of Italy, Via Granarolo 64, Faenza 48018, Italy
2
Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo F Vito, 1, Rome 00168, Italy
3
Latium Musculoskeletal Tissue Bank, Largo F Vito, 1, Rome 00168, Italy
4
Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo F Vito, 1, Rome 00168, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2016, 9(9), 763; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9090763
Submission received: 8 July 2016 / Revised: 29 August 2016 / Accepted: 2 September 2016 / Published: 8 September 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioceramics 2016)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The present work describes the synthesis of novel injectable, self-setting bone cements made of strontium-substituted hydroxyapatite (Sr-HA), obtained by single-phase calcium phosphate precursors doped with different amounts of strontium and enriched with alginate. The addition of alginate improved the injectability, cohesion, and compression strength of the cements, without affecting the hardening process. A Sr-HA cement exhibiting adequate hardening times and mechanical strength for clinical applications was further tested in vivo in a rabbit model, in comparison with a commercial calcium phosphate cement, revealing the maintenance of biomimetic composition and porous microstructure even after one month in vivo, as well as enhanced ability to induce new bone formation and penetration.

1. Introduction

The development of injectable and self-hardening biomaterials able to regenerate damaged bones by minimal invasive surgery is a topic of increasing interest, particularly for the treatment of vertebral fractures [1,2,3,4,5], but also tibial plateau, proximal humerus, wrist and calcaneus [6], as well as hip and femoral neck [7].
In this respect, complete bone regeneration still remains an unsolved clinical need, mainly due to the unavailability of bone cements endowed with adequate bioactivity, porosity, and osteoconductivity able to promote effective new bone formation and extensive cell proliferation upon hardening. Indeed, it has been reported that the main drawback exhibited by commercially available bone cements is the inability to be completely colonized by the new bone, thus affecting the establishment of well-integrated bone-biomaterial constructs [8,9,10]. The impairment of the mechanical performance may be due to both the excessive stiffness of the cement, as reported in the case of acrylic formulations [11,12,13,14], and the low porosity, as reported in the case of calcium phosphate bone cements (CPCs) [1,15].
The hardening of acrylic bone cements (e.g., poly(methylmethacrylate), PMMA) is also reported to occur through an exothermic polymerization, leading to the necrosis of the surrounding tissues [16]. In this respect, CPCs are considered as elective candidates for bone regeneration due to their excellent biocompatibility, chemical similarity with bone tissue, and ability to harden in vivo at body temperature.
Several approaches have been proposed to prepare CPCs; among them, the one based on the hydrolysis and transformation of α-Ca3(PO4)2 (αTCP) into elongated calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite (HA) particles is particularly interesting and promising [1]. Indeed, the chemical reactions involved in the cement hardening are isothermal and not subjected to pH variations, thus avoiding potential cell injury. Calcium-deficient HA is also characterized by increased bioactivity and bio-resorbability, if compared with stoichiometric HA [17]. Moreover, such cements can be endowed with enhanced bioactivity by introduction of bio-competent ions (e.g., Mg2+, CO32−, SiO44−, and Sr2+) in the HA lattice as substitutes of calcium or phosphate [18,19,20,21]. Strontium has been largely studied due to its proven ability to restore the bone turnover balance, especially when the treatment of bone fractures caused by osteoporosis is demanded [22,23]. As systemic pharmacological approaches based on Sr-containing drugs often resulted in deleterious effects on bone mineralization due to reduction in calcium absorption and possible alterations of the properties of the mineral bone [24], a controlled delivery of relevant active principles in situ is highly desirable to provide safe and efficient therapies against degenerative bone diseases. Some positive results on the efficacy of local release of strontium were obtained in recent studies based on titanium implants functionalized with strontium [25] or coated with Sr-substituted HA [26]. In addition, Sr-containing CPCs based on commercial αTCP and soluble salts containing strontium (e.g., SrCO3, SrHPO4) were previously developed [27,28,29] and tested in ovariectomized rats [30].
A major challenge for material scientists is the control of the chemistry and rheological properties of injectable CPCs; indeed, process parameters, such as phase composition of the inorganic precursor, particle size, liquid-on-powder ratio (L/P), polymeric additives are critical factors affecting their viscosity, cohesion, and setting times [15]. In this respect, previous research reported improved cement injectability and cohesion by decreasing the particle size of the starting powders, as well as using more viscous solutions. However, in such conditions the increase of the cement cohesion was also associated to an impairment of setting times and mechanical performance [31]. It was also reported that smaller precursor particles favor the transformation into apatite, as well as the establishment of a more packed structure and higher mechanical strength [32,33,34]. On the other hand, the introduction of foreign ions into the calcium phosphate structure prolonged the setting times [29,35]. Among the various approaches proposed to improve the hydraulic reactivity of the precursor powders, the high-energy planetary ball milling was reported to be particularly promising in terms of optimal particle size reduction efficiency [36]. Previous research was also dedicated to improve the rheological properties of the cement by addition of organic compounds such as biopolymers [15]. In this respect, alginate was reported as a biomaterial for bone tissue engineering, due to its biocompatibility, non-toxicity, and biodegradability, as well as for its strengthening ability [37].
In the present work Sr-doped HA cements were prepared by mixing Sr-substituted αTCP phases, appositely designed and synthesized to be the unique inorganic precursors, with disodium phosphate solutions enriched with alginate. The process parameters, e.g., the powder milling and liquid-to-solid ratio, were optimized to obtain adequate setting times and mechanical properties. The in vivo performance of a selected cement formulation was preliminary evaluated at four weeks after surgery into rabbit femur, in comparison with a commercial CPC, by compositional, morphological, and histological/histomorphometric analysis.

2. Results

2.1. Physicochemical Properties and Setting Behavior

The ICP analysis of the Sr-αTCP phases detected the presence of strontium in amounts very close to the nominal composition of the starting mixture (see Table 1).
The XRD patterns of the as-obtained powders show peaks that can be ascribed to αTCP (ICDD: 29-0359) and βTCP phases (ICDD: 09-0169). No XRD reflections belonging to other crystalline phases were detected (see Figure 1a). Semi-quantitative evaluation of the phase composition reported the formation of βTCP phase (in the range 7–12 wt %) in the as-prepared materials, slightly increasing with the strontium content.
The phase composition of the cements obtained after three days of incubation at 37 °C in a thermostated water bath was also investigated, showing the complete transformation of αTCP into HA phases, while preserving small amounts of βTCP (see Figure 1b).
A steady shift of the peaks towards higher d values and a quasi-linear increase of the lattice parameters were observed in both α and βTCP phases. A similar effect was also detected for the HA phases of the corresponding hardened cements (Table 2).
The Sr-free αTCP phase (Sr0) exhibited a domain size D = 362 ± 8 nm and a steady increase of the coherent domain was observed by increasing the strontium content, according to the quasi-linear trend D = 299.6 + 11.4x (R2 = 0.98), where x is the Sr/(Ca + Sr) percentage molar ratio. The domain size of βTCP showed much lower values, in the range 100–150 nm.
The average domain size of Sr-HA was about 25 nm, nearly irrespective of the strontium amount. The full width half maximum of (300) and (002) reflections (d ≌ 2.72 and 3.44 Å, respectively) were also separately evaluated, thus achieving the size of coherent domains along both the ab plane and the c axis: it was found that the introduction of strontium progressively induced anisotropic crystal growth along the c axis (Figure 2a), leading to the distortion of the HA lattice (Figure 2b) according to the quasi-linear trend c/a = 0.73 + 1.8 × 10−4x (R2 = 0.99), where x is the Sr/(Ca + Sr) percentage molar ratio.
The cement formulations enriched with alginate exhibited improved injectability and cohesion of the paste, without demixing or cement fragmentation after 30 min of immersion into Hanks’ balanced salt solution at 37 °C (Figure 3).
The presence of alginate did not negatively affect the setting reactions, while a weak retarding effect on the phase transformation was observed, especially for Sr5. On the other hand, the introduction of strontium retarded both the setting times and the transformation of Sr-αTCP into Sr-HA (Table 3 and Figure 4).

2.2. Morphological and Mechanical Aspects

The Sr-doped cements exhibited nano-sized elongated crystals developed upon heterogeneous nucleation and growth on the surface of the precursor particles (Figure 5), thus enabling the establishment of an extensive micron-sized porosity, irrespective of the extent of strontium doping.
The overall porosity of Sr0, Sr2 and Sr5 cements was calculated as 51% ± 2%, 46% ± 3%, and 49% ± 1%, respectively.
The presence of alginate significantly improved the compressive strength and Young’s modulus of the cements at three days after immersion into Hanks’ balanced salt solution at 37 °C, when compared with alginate-free formulations (Figure 6).
The Sr2 cement exhibited the highest compressive strength. The long-term compressive strength of Sr2 was also tested, exhibiting σ = 28.1 ± 1.2 MPa and Young’s modulus E = 2.3 ± 0.2 GPa after 30 days of immersion in physiological conditions.
On the basis of these results, the compressive strength of Sr2 cement was also tested in comparison with KyphOs cement, which was the control of the in vivo tests. At one, and after three, days of incubation, the KyphOs cement exhibited higher compressive strength than Sr2, and also significantly lower porosity (Figure 7).

2.3. Biological Evaluation by in Vitro Cell Tests

The incorporation of both strontium and alginate did not induce cytotoxicity, leading to a higher percentage of viable cells. The intracellular esterase activity and plasma membrane integrity were preserved. Only a few dead cells (stained in red) were observed (Figure 8a–c). Analysis of cell morphology carried out with SEM showed nearly complete coverage of Sr2 cement by well-spread cells (Figure 8d) and cell plasma extensions were evident (Figure 8e).

2.4. In Vivo Pilot Experiment and Histological Analysis

A pilot in vivo test was carried out to investigate the performance of Sr2 cement, selected for composition, setting, and the mechanical properties in accordance with the clinical need, in comparison with KyphOs FS™, Medtronic Spine LLC, Minneapolis, MN, USA, a polymer-free commercial CPC [8]. The histological analysis of the explants at four weeks after the injection in vivo evidenced an intimate contact between the bone cements and the surrounding bone, without inflammatory processes, fractures or infections (Figure 9).
The histomorphometric parameters bone-material contact rate (BMCR) and bone penetration rate length (BPR-Le) (see Table 4) were used to quantify bone-material interaction and new bone penetration, thus showing significantly enhanced formation of new bone around Sr2 cement, when compared with the control cement (Figure 10).
Explanted tissues treated with Sr2 and control cement were subjected to XRD analysis to investigate the phase composition. Complete transformation of α-TCP into HA was detected in the sample treated with Sr2, so that only low-crystallinity HA and unreacted βTCP were detected. Additionally, the profile of the HA pattern exhibited a significant peak broadening, if compared with the HA phase obtained after immersion of Sr2 for three days in Hanks’ balanced salt solution at 37 °C, thus suggesting a decrease in the crystal order possibly due to the long term permanence of the cement in vivo (Figure 11). In particular, the domain size along (300) direction (i.e., the ab plane) was reduced from 19.9 ± 0.7 to 9.6 ± 1.8 nm, whereas along the (002) direction (i.e., the c axis) it decreased from 62.9 ± 1.6 to 34.3 ± 2.2 nm. The explanted tissue treated with KyphOs showed the presence of a low-crystallinity HA phase, but was associated with a significant amount of residual precursor phases, including αTCP, thus indicating that the transformation process was not complete after one month in vivo.
Furthermore, SEM analysis of the explants highlighted marked difference in the cement microstructure after setting in vitro and in vivo, as Sr2 still exhibited after implantation a diffuse microporosity after one month in vivo, contrary to the control (Figure 12).

3. Discussion

In the present work, Sr-substituted αTCP phases were synthesized as a unique inorganic precursor for the development of apatitic bone cements. For the first time, Sr-substituted apatitic cements were obtained by incorporating sodium alginate and tested both in vitro and in a small in vivo pilot study. The cements were optimized to fulfill specific requirements for clinical applications in terms of hardening times and mechanical strength [42,43].
The precursor synthesis, based on solid state reactions followed by fast quenching, generated Sr-doped αTCP phases with limited amounts of βTCP polymorph, slightly increasing with the strontium content, as previously reported [3]. This results are in compliance with the larger ionic radius of strontium compared with calcium (Sr2+ ionic radius = 0.113 nm; Ca2+ ionic radius = 0.099 nm) and in good quantitative agreement with the data provided in previous works [38,39,40,41]. In this respect, the detection of Sr amounts very close to the nominal composition of the starting mixture (Table 1), associated with the absence of secondary phases other than TCP (Figure 1) and the simultaneous increase of the lattice parameters (Figure 2), confirmed the incorporation of strontium into the TCP crystal lattices and in the final HA phase obtained upon cement setting.
The achievement of complete injectability, associated with adequate setting times, is reported to be one of the most critical issues of CPCs [8]; in this respect, the addition of polymeric additives into CPCs has been widely investigated in previous research to enhance the rheological properties, but the precise control of their effect still remains challenging [44].
In our cements, characterized by ionic substitutions with strontium and the presence of alginate, a significant retard in both setting times (Table 3), and the transformation of TCP phases into apatite (Figure 4) were detected. However, this effect can be mainly ascribed to the presence of strontium, as also hypothesized in previous works [3,20,45], whereas the effect of alginate appeared as negligible.
As a general rule, comparative analyses among the various cements reported in literature are made quite difficult by the variety of different, and often incomparable, preparation routes [20], thus often leading to contradicting results.
It was reported that the incorporation of biopolymers can improve the functional properties of CPCs [44]. In this respect, despite previous research reporting the addition of alginate as deleterious for the mechanical performance of αTCP-based CPCs formulations [46], in the present work the use of alginate significantly improved both injectability and cohesion (Figure 3), leading also to significantly higher mechanical strength when compared with alginate-free cements (Figure 6). The effect of strontium on the mechanical strength appeared as negligible in alginate-free cements up to Sr2, while Sr5 exhibited the lowest values; a similar trend, but with greater statistical difference, was also detected among the alginate-containing cements, with Sr2 exhibiting the highest compressive strength (Figure 7), even comparable to previously-reported CPCs reinforced with fibers [15].
The reinforcement mechanism provided by alginate could be due to a crack bridging effect, similarly to what proposed by [47] in the case of cellulose-containing CPCs.
On the other hand, a previous study reported a decrease of the mechanical strength of Sr-CPCs above a certain threshold of strontium [48], possibly due to the higher occurrence of crystal lattice distortion related to strontium’s larger ionic radius; in our study, we observed a similar effect for Sr/(Sr + Ca) above 2 mol %.
For the first time the biological effect of strontium doping and alginate into an apatitic cement was tested with MG63 cells, resulting in excellent proliferation and spreading of the seeded cells (Figure 8). This finding confirms previous studies reporting beneficial effects of strontium on cell proliferation in vitro [20], while the absence of cytotoxic effects related to alginate was assessed, supporting its use in the development of biomaterials for bone regeneration.
On the basis of adequate cement composition and setting time for clinical applications [42,43], the Sr2 cement was selected to be mechanically and in vivo tested in comparison with KyphOs, a commercial strontium-containing apatitic cement [8] as control. After one month in vivo the Sr2 cement showed significantly higher bone-material contact and bone penetration (Figure 9 and Figure 10), perhaps due to the higher porosity. It might be also hypothesized that the presence of alginate favored the penetration of bone tissue into the cement by progressive bio-erosion in vivo. Comparative in vivo tests should be performed to support this hypothesis; however, in the present work we found that alginate-free pastes did not reach acceptable rheological and mechanical properties, as well as adequate setting times when injected in liquid media, so as to be considered as not interesting for real applications.
The XRD analysis of the explanted tissues reported that the composition of the control cement did not change significantly after one month in vivo, with only a partial conversion of the precursors into hydroxyapatite. Conversely, Sr2 exhibited complete transformation into hydroxyapatite in vivo, thus leading to the establishment of a completely biomimetic composition (Figure 11). In Sr2, the analysis of the HA peak profile evidenced a marked reduction of the crystal domain size. In this respect, it can be hypothesized that Sr2 underwent also a degradation process following the new bone formation and penetration.
The SEM analysis of the explants reported the maintenance of an extensive microporosity in Sr2 even after one month in vivo, while a more packed structure was exhibited by the control cement, that might have limited bone penetration into the cement mass (Figure 12). KyphOs exhibited significantly higher compressive strength but also lower overall porosity (Figure 7). Porosity substantially influences both the biological activity and the mechanical properties of biomaterials, therefore their optimization is a key aspect in the development of a bone cement. The microporosity of CPCs, which usually varies between 30% and 55%, is significantly dependent on the L/P ratio: the higher the L/P ratio, the higher the microporosity [15]. Therefore, to optimize these two properties, L/P ratio was maintained at the lowest value enabling complete injection and adequate cohesion. The final L/P of Sr2 resulted slightly higher than the control cement, i.e., 0.48 and 0.43, respectively; this yielded a much higher porosity associated with nanosized elongated crystals, as typically occurs in apatitic CPCs [3,49,50], which might have favored osteointegration.
The bioactivity and effective osteointegration of a bone scaffold are key aspects to trigger and sustain bone regeneration in critical size defects [51]. In this respect, the approach presented in this work enabled the preparation of Sr-substituted HA cements with controlled and biomimetic composition, with defined strontium content replacing calcium in the lattice of HA, associated to excellent injectability, cohesion, and stable compressive strength enabling mechanical loading. The new cement maintained also high bioactivity and porosity in vivo, making these new pastes interesting for future applicative purposes.
Although other cement formulations (e.g., PMMA-based cements) enable the early-stage mobilization of the patient after surgery due to high mechanical strength, their intrinsic bioinertness prevent effective bone regeneration. In this respect, the implantation of bioactive apatitic pastes able to completely transform into apatite while maintaining a microporous structure can be elective for bone regeneration, due to the extensive colonization by new bone that can also improve the mechanical performance of the implant over time, as already evidenced in previous studies [52,53]. This is particularly relevant in the case of young and still physically active patients, for whom effective bone regeneration is of paramount importance to restore the physiological bone functionality.

4. Experimental Section

4.1. Preparation of the Inorganic Precursors

Sr-substituted αTCP powders with different strontium content (i.e., Sr/(Ca + Sr) = 0, 2, 5 mol %, henceforth coded as Sr0, Sr2, Sr5, respectively) were synthesized by solid state reaction of stoichiometric amounts of calcium carbonate (CaCO3, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), dicalcium phosphate dibasic anhydrous (CaHPO4, Sigma Aldrich) and strontium carbonate (SrCO3, Sigma Aldrich), following the reaction:
x S r C O 3 + ( 1 − x ) C a C O 3 + 2 C a H P O 4 → C a 3 − x S r x ( P O 4 ) 2 +   H 2 O +   C O 2
The powders were dry mixed for 30 min, then pressed to form pellets and finally treated at 1400 °C for 1 h in a platinum crucible. The pellets were removed from the hot furnace and rapidly crushed into small pieces to stabilize the αTCP phase against the re-crystallization of βTCP [5]. Then, the as-obtained product was sieved below 150 µm and milled by planetary mono mill (Pulverisette 6 classic line, Fritsch, Germany). In detail, the powder was dispersed in pure ethanol and milled for 50 min at 400 rpm using a zirconia jar with 5 mm diameter grinding media (ball-to-powder weight ratio = 2).
Aqueous solutions of disodium hydrogen phosphate dehydrate, 5 wt % (Na2HPO4·2H2O, Fluka), and sodium alginate, 2 wt % (Alginic Acid Sodium Salt from Brown Algae, Sigma Aldrich) were prepared.
The solid and liquid components were sterilized with γ irradiation (25 kGy) and autoclave (121 °C for 20 min), respectively, and mixed with the powders according to a liquid-to-powder (L/P) ratio equal to 0.48. The mixing procedure of the cement components and the extrusion of the cement were performed by commercial equipment (P-system, Medmix, Rotkreuz, Switzerland).
Polymer-free formulations were obtained without adding sodium alginate into the solution.
The control cement (KyphOs FS™, Medtronic Spine LLC, Minneapolis, MN, USA), was prepared by mixing the powder and the liquid [8] with liquid-on-powder ratio equal to 0.43, according to the procedure included in the commercial package.

4.2. Characterization of the Pastes and Hardened Cements

4.2.1. Composition and Crystallographics

The elemental composition was evaluated by inductively-coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (5100 ICP-OES, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The cement precursors were analyzed by dissolution of 20 mg of powders into 2 mL of nitric acid (HNO3, Sigma Aldrich), followed by dilution to 100 mL with bi-distilled water; three specimens were tested for each cement formulation.
The XRD patterns were acquired in the 2θ range 10°–80°, with a scan step of 0.02°, counting 0.5 s (D8 Advance, Bruker AXS equipped with a LINXEYE detector, Karlsruhe, Germany). Upon subtraction of the instrumental broadening, the collected XRD patterns were evaluated by Rietveld method (TOPAS 5 software, Bruker AXS, Karlsruhe, Germany) to simultaneously refine the scale factor, peak position, and peak broadening, thus obtaining the content of crystalline phases present, the lattice parameters and domain sizes. The Rietveld analysis was carried out by using the crystal models of Sr-free αTCP [54], βTCP [55] and HA [56] phases. The hardened cements were analyzed after three days of soaking in Hanks’ balanced salt solution (H6648, Sigma Aldrich) at 37 °C.

4.2.2. Injectability and Setting Times

The cement injectability was qualitatively evaluated by measuring the amount of cement in the syringe after extrusion [33]. The initial and final setting times of the cements (indicated as Tin and Tfin, respectively) were evaluated by Gillmore apparatus, according to ASTM C266-99, testing five specimens for each composition, upon immersion in Hanks’ balanced salt solution at 37 °C. On the basis of setting times appropriate for the clinical practice, we considered an initial setting time ≤15 min as a threshold.

4.2.3. Morphological Characterization

The morphology of the cements was observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM: FEI, Quanta 200, Hillsboro, OR, USA) after immersion in Hanks’ balanced salt solution at 37 °C for 3 days. The porosity percentage was evaluated on hardened cylindrical specimens, as P = 1 − ρ/ρ0, where ρ is the cement density calculated as weight-on-volume ratio and ρ0 is the theoretical density of the hydroxyapatite phase (3.16 g/cm3).

4.2.4. Mechanical Evaluation

The compressive strength and Young’s modulus of cements were evaluated by testing cylindrical specimens (n. 12 samples; diameter = 8 mm; height = 17 mm) obtained after hardening in teflon moulds for 30 min and then immersed in Hanks’ balanced salt solution at 37 °C for three days. The tests were performed in displacement control at 1 mm/min by a universal testing machine (MTS Insight 5, Eden Prairie, MN, USA). The planarity of the endplates was obtained by using an automatic surface grinder (VAM Rettificatrici, Cuggiono, Italy).
Long term evaluation of a selected cement was carried out in agreement with ISO 9917 by testing cylindrical specimens (diameter = 8 mm; height = 17 mm) up to 30 days of soaking in Hanks’ balanced salt solution [57] at 37 °C (n. 12 samples were tested).
The Young’s modulus was approximated by calculating the slope of the linear, elastic portion of the stress–strain curves until the failure stress of the specimen. The statistical analysis of data was made by a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Sidak’s multiple comparisons test (GraphPad 6.0, GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA).

4.2.5. Cell Culture

The cytocompatibility of alginate-containing cements was investigated by direct cell culture with human osteoblast-like cell line (MG63 cell line) purchased from Lonza (Basel, Switzerland). The cells were cultured in Dulbecco Modified Eagle’s (DMEM)/F12 Medium (Gibco, Waltham, MA, USA), containing penicillin-streptomycin (100 U/mL–100 µg/mL) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and kept at 37 °C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2. For the experiments, cells were plated at 1.5 × 104/cm2 and cultured for up to three days. Cylindrical cement specimens (diameter = 10 mm and height = 2 mm) were sterilized with three washes in ethanol 70% for 20 min followed by three washes in 1X PBS for 10 min each. Samples were then air dried and sterilized by UV irradiation for 30 min per side under a laminar flow hood and preconditioned for three days in cell culture medium supplemented with FBS and penicillin-streptomycin.
Then, samples were placed one per well in a 24 well plate and a drop of 50 µL containing the cell suspension was seeded on the center of the upper discs surface allowing the cell attachment for 30 min in the incubator, before adding 1.5 mL of cell culture medium into each well.
All cell-handling procedures were performed in a sterile laminar flow hood. All cell culture incubation steps were performed at 37 °C with 5% CO2 and controlled humidity.

4.2.6. Cell Viability Assay

A live/dead assay kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, the samples were washed with 1X PBS for 5 min and incubated with calceinacetoxymethyl (Calcein AM) 2 µM plus ethidium homodimer-1 (EthD-1) 4 µM for 15 min at 37 °C in the dark, the samples were rinsed in 1X PBS [58]. Images were acquired by an inverted Nikon Ti-E fluorescence microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). One sample per cement was analyzed at day three.

4.2.7. Cell Morphology Evaluation

The samples were washed with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer pH 7.4 and fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer pH 7.4 for 2 h at 4 °C, washed in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer pH 7.4 and dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol for 10 min each. After sputter-coating with gold, the samples were observed by scanning electron microscopy.

4.2.8. In Vivo Pilot Experiment and Histological Analysis

The in vivo performance of a selected Sr-doped cement was assessed by implantation in three New Zealand White (NZW) male rabbits (weighing about 3 kg) for each cement. The tests were conducted with previous approval of the institutional Ethical Committee strictly following Italian (Law by Decree, 27 January 1992, No. 116), European (Directive 86/609/EEC) and International Laws and Regulations (ISO 10993-2-Animal Welfare Requirements). The cements were implanted according to a previously reported procedure [18,59,60]. Briefly, a blind tunnel (diameter = 4 mm; length = 8 mm) was aseptically created under fluoroscopic control by a surgical drill in the meta-epiphyseal distal zone of both femurs, then irrigated with a saline solution and filled by injection with the cements. All the procedures were performed under general anesthesia (ketamine 10 mg/kg + xylazine 0.3 mg/kg Intramuscular, isoflurane + oxygen + nitrogen protoxide with mask) with daily veterinary control. At four weeks after surgery, the animals were pharmacologically euthanized with intravenous administration of Tanax. The femurs were then harvested and the surrounding soft-tissue was removed. The presence of deformities or fractures and the bone-cement interface were investigated. For histological analysis, the harvested specimens were fixed in phosphate-buffered 4% paraformaldehyde and stored at 4 °C for 12 h until processing. Then, the specimens were embedded in Technovit 7200, according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Exakt, Norderstedt, Germany). By using a saw microtome (Leica Microsystems Srl, Milano, Italy), three consecutive central sections (30 ± 10 µm) were cut and stained with toluidine blue. The region of interest (ROI) was made by tracing over the material followed by a 100 pixel increase to include the bone-cement interface.
The microscopic examination was performed by an optical microscope (Carl Zeiss Axioscop 40 equipped with Axiocam ICC 3 Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) and Axiovision 4.8 software (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). Standard terms and nomenclature for bone histomorphometric analysis were used, according to [61]. The statistical analysis of data, expressed as mean ± SEM (standard error of the mean), was made by an unpaired t-test (GraphPad software 6.0).

Acknowledgments

The Authors acknowledge the EU project NMP3-SL-2010-SMALL-3-246373 (OPHIS) and the National Project, PNR-CNR Aging Program 2012–2014, for funding the present research. Clearly state if you received funds for covering the costs to publish in open access.

Author Contributions

Simone Sprio and Anna Tampieri conceived and designed the experiments, and wrote part of the paper; Massimiliano Dapporto carried out most of the experimental work of synthesis and characterization, and wrote part of the paper; Monica Montesi and Silvia Panseri performed some materials characterizations and biological tests; Giandomenico Logroscino designed the in vivo tests; Wanda Lattanzi and Enrico Pola carried out animal tests and data analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest, and the founding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Bohner, M. Calcium orthophosphates in medicine: From ceramics to calcium phosphate cements. Injury 2000, 31, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Poitout, D.G. Biomechanics and Biomaterials in Orthopedics, 1st ed.; Springer: London, UK, 2004; p. 654. [Google Scholar]
  3. Saint-Jean, S.J.; Camire, C.L.; Nevsten, P.; Hansen, S.; Ginebra, M.P. Study of the reactivity and in vitro bioactivity of Sr-substituted alpha-TCP cements. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2005, 16, 993–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Watts, N.B.; Harris, S.T.; Genant, H.K. Treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures with percutaneous vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty. Osteoporos. Int. 2001, 12, 429–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Xue, W.; Dahlquist, K.; Banerjee, A.; Bandyopadhyay, A.; Bose, S. Synthesis and characterization of tricalcium phosphate with Zn and Mg based dopants. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2008, 19, 2669–2677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kona, S.; Wadajkar, A.S.; Nguyen, K.T. Tissue engineering applications of injectable biomaterials. In Injectable Biomaterials; Vernon, B., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2011; pp. 142–182. [Google Scholar]
  7. Stankewich, C.J.; Swiontkowski, M.F.; Tencer, A.F.; Yetkinler, D.N.; Poser, R.D. Augmentation of femoral neck fracture fixation with an injectable calcium-phosphate bone mineral cement. J. Orthopaed. Res. 1996, 14, 786–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Bohner, M. Design of ceramic-based cements and putties for bone graft substitution. Eur. Cells Mater. 2010, 20, 3–10. [Google Scholar]
  9. Canal, C.; Ginebra, M.P. Fibre-reinforced calcium phosphate cements: A review. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. 2011, 4, 1658–1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Kruger, R.; Groll, J. Fiber reinforced calcium phosphate cements—On the way to degradable load bearing bone substitutes? Biomaterials 2012, 33, 5887–5900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Becker, S.; Dabirrahmani, D.; Hogg, M.; Appleyard, R.; Baroud, G.; Gillies, M. Disadvantages of balloon kyphoplasty with PMMA—A clinical and biomechanical statement. J. Miner. Stoffwechs. 2011, 18, 9–12. [Google Scholar]
  12. Boner, V.; Kuhn, P.; Mendel, T.; Gisep, A. Temperature evaluation during PMMA screw augmentation in osteoporotic bone—An in vitro study about the risk of thermal necrosis in human femoral heads. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2009, 90, 842–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Deramond, H.; Wright, N.T.; Belkoff, S.M. Temperature elevation caused by bone cement polymerization during vertebroplasty. Bone 1999, 25, S17–S21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kolb, J.P.; Kueny, R.A.; Puschel, K.; Boger, A.; Rueger, J.M.; Morlock, M.M.; Huber, G.; Lehmann, W. Does the cement stiffness affect fatigue fracture strength of vertebrae after cement augmentation in osteoporotic patients? Eur. Spine J. 2013, 22, 1650–1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhang, J.T.; Liu, W.Z.; Schnitzler, V.; Tancret, F.; Bouler, J.M. Calcium phosphate cements for bone substitution: Chemistry, handling and mechanical properties. Acta Biomater. 2014, 10, 1035–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ormsby, R.; McNally, T.; Mitchell, C.; Dunne, N. Incorporation of multiwalled carbon nanotubes to acrylic based bone cements: Effects on mechanical and thermal properties. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2010, 3, 136–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Mavropoulos, E.; Rossi, A.M.; da Rocha, N.C.C.; Soares, G.A.; Moreira, J.C.; Moure, G.T. Dissolution of calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite synthesized at different conditions. Mater. Charact. 2003, 50, 203–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Landi, E.; Logroscino, G.; Proietti, L.; Tampieri, A.; Sandri, M.; Sprio, S. Biomimetic Mg-substituted hydroxyapatite: From synthesis to in vivo behaviour. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2008, 19, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Landi, E.; Tampieri, A.; Celotti, G.; Sprio, S.; Sandri, M.; Logroscino, G. Sr-substituted hydroxyapatites for osteoporotic bone replacement. Acta Biomater. 2007, 3, 961–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Schumacher, M.; Gelinsky, M. Strontium modified calcium phosphate cements—Approaches towards targeted stimulation of bone turnover. J. Mater. Chem. B 2015, 3, 4626–4640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sprio, S.; Tampieri, A.; Landi, E.; Sandri, M.; Martorana, S.; Celotti, G.; Logroscino, G. Physico-chemical properties and solubility behaviour of multi-substituted hydroxyapatite powders containing silicon. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2008, 28, 179–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dahl, S.G.; Allain, P.; Marie, P.J.; Mauras, Y.; Boivin, G.; Ammann, P.; Tsouderos, Y.; Delmas, P.D.; Christiansen, C. Incorporation and distribution of strontium in bone. Bone 2001, 28, 446–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Marie, P.J.; Ammann, P.; Boivin, G.; Rey, C. Mechanisms of action and therapeutic potential of strontium in bone. Calcif. Tissue Int. 2001, 69, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Grynpas, M.D.; Hamilton, E.; Cheung, R.; Tsouderos, Y.; Deloffre, P.; Hott, M.; Marie, P.J. Strontium increases vertebral bone volume in rats at a low dose that does not induce detectable mineralization defect. Bone 1996, 18, 253–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Andersen, O.Z.; Offermanns, V.; Sillassen, M.; Almtoft, K.P.; Andersen, I.H.; Sorensen, S.; Jeppesen, C.S.; Kraft, D.C.E.; Bottiger, J.; Rasse, M.; et al. Accelerated bone ingrowth by local delivery of strontium from surface functionalized titanium implants. Biomaterials 2013, 34, 5883–5890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Li, Y.F.; Li, Q.; Zhu, S.S.; Luo, E.; Li, J.H.; Feng, G.; Liao, Y.M.; Hu, J. The effect of strontium-substituted hydroxyapatite coating on implant fixation in ovariectomized rats. Biomaterials 2010, 31, 9006–9014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Alkhraisat, M.H.; Moseke, C.; Blanco, L.; Barralet, J.E.; Lopez-Carbacos, E.; Gbureck, U. Strontium modified biocements with zero order release kinetics. Biomaterials 2008, 29, 4691–4697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Baier, M.; Staudt, P.; Klein, R.; Sommer, U.; Wenz, R.; Grafe, I.; Meeder, P.J.; Nawroth, P.P.; Kasperk, C. Strontium enhances osseointegration of calcium phosphate cement: A histomorphometric pilot study in ovariectomized rats. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2013, 8, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Schumacher, M.; Henss, A.; Rohnke, M.; Gelinsky, M. A novel and easy-to-prepare strontium(II) modified calcium phosphate bone cement with enhanced mechanical properties. Acta Biomater. 2013, 9, 7536–7544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Thormann, U.; Ray, S.; Sommer, U.; ElKhassawna, T.; Rehling, T.; Hundgeburth, M.; Henss, A.; Rohnke, M.; Janek, J.; Lips, K.S.; et al. Bone formation induced by strontium modified calcium phosphate cement in critical-size metaphyseal fracture defects in ovariectomized rats. Biomaterials 2013, 34, 8589–8598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Khairoun, I.; Driessens, F.C.M.; Boltong, M.G.; Planell, J.A.; Wenz, R. Addition of cohesion promoters to calcium phosphate cements. Biomaterials 1999, 20, 393–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ginebra, M.P.; Driessens, F.C.; Planell, J.A. Effect of the particle size on the micro and nanostructural features of a calcium phosphate cement: A kinetic analysis. Biomaterials 2004, 25, 3453–3462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Montufar, E.B.; Maazouz, Y.; Ginebra, M.P. Relevance of the setting reaction to the injectability of tricalcium phosphate pastes. Acta Biomater. 2013, 9, 6188–6198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Liu, C.S.; Shao, H.F.; Chen, F.Y.; Zheng, H.Y. Effects of the granularity of raw materials on the hydration and hardening process of calcium phosphate cement. Biomaterials 2003, 24, 4103–4113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kuang, G.M.; Yau, W.P.; Lam, W.M.; Wu, J.; Chiu, K.Y.; Lu, W.W.; Pan, H.B. An effective approach by a chelate reaction in optimizing the setting process of strontium-incorporated calcium phosphate bone cement. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B 2012, 100, 778–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Jack, V.; Buchanan, F.J.; Dunne, N.I. Particle attrition of alpha-tricalcium phosphate: Effect on mechanical, handling, and injectability properties of calcium phosphate cements. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H 2008, 222, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Lee, G.S.; Park, J.H.; Won, J.E.; Shin, U.S.; Kim, H.W. Alginate combined calcium phosphate cements: Mechanical properties and in vitro rat bone marrow stromal cell responses. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2011, 22, 1257–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Pina, S.; Torres, P.M.; Goetz-Neunhoeffer, F.; Neubauer, J.; Ferreira, J.M. Newly developed Sr-substituted alpha-TCP bone cements. Acta Biomater. 2010, 6, 928–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Bigi, A.; Foresti, E.; Gandolfi, M.; Gazzano, M.; Roveri, N. Isomorphous substitutions in β-tricalcium phosphate: The different effects of zinc and strontium. J. Inorg. Biochem. 1997, 66, 259–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bigi, A.; Boanini, E.; Capuccini, C.; Gazzano, M. Strontium-substituted hydroxyapatite nanocrystals. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2007, 360, 1009–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Donazzon, B.; Dechambre, G.; Lacout, J.L. Calcium-strontium hydroxyapatite: Hydrothermal preparation. Ann. Chim. Sci. Mater. 1998, 23, 53–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bohner, M. Reactivity of calcium phosphate cements. J. Mater. Chem. 2007, 17, 3980–3986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Dorozhkin, S.V. Calcium orthophosphate cements for biomedical application. J. Mater. Sci. 2008, 43, 3028–3057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Perez, R.A.; Kim, H.W.; Ginebra, M.P. Polymeric additives to enhance the functional properties of calcium phosphate cements. J. Tissue Eng. 2012, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Boanini, E.; Panzavolta, S.; Rubini, K.; Gandolfi, M.; Bigi, A. Effect of strontium and gelatin on the reactivity of alpha-tricalcium phosphate. Acta Biomater. 2010, 6, 936–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Dos Santos, L.A.; de Oliveria, L.C.; Rigo, E.C.; Carrodeguas, R.G.; Boschi, A.O.; de Arruda, A.C. Influence of polymeric additives on the mechanical properties of alpha-tricalcium phosphate cement. Bone 1999, 25, s99–s102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Liu, W.Z.; Zhang, J.T.; Weiss, P.; Tancret, F.; Bouler, J.M. The influence of different cellulose ethers on both the handling and mechanical properties of calcium phosphate cements for bone substitution. Acta Biomater. 2013, 9, 5740–5750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Guo, D.G.; Xu, K.W.; Zhao, X.Y.; Han, Y. Development of a strontium-containing hydroxyapatite bone cement. Biomaterials 2005, 26, 4073–4083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Oda, M.; Takeuchi, A.; Lin, X.; Matsuya, S.; Ishikawa, K. Effects of liquid phase on basic properties of alpha-tricalcium phosphate-based apatite cement. Dent. Mater. J. 2008, 27, 672–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. TenHuisen, K.S.; Brown, P.W. Formation of calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite from alpha-tricalcium phosphate. Biomaterials 1998, 19, 2209–2217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sprio, S.; Fricia, M.; Maddalena, G.F.; Nataloni, A.; Tampieri, A. Osteointegration in cranial bone reconstruction: A goal to achieve. J. Appl. Biomater. Funct. Mater. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Stefini, R.; Esposito, G.; Zanotti, B.; Iaccarino, C.; Fontanella, M.M.; Servadei, F. Use of “custom made” porous hydroxyapatite implants for cranioplasty: Postoperative analysis of complications in 1549 patients. Surg. Neurol. Int. 2013, 4, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Stefini, R.; Zanotti, B.; Nataloni, A.; Martinetti, R.; Scafuto, M.; Colasurdo, M.; Tampieri, A. The efficacy of custom-made porous hydroxyapatite prostheses for cranioplasty: Evaluation of postmarketing data on 2697 patients. J. Appl. Biomater. Funct. Mater. 2015, 13, 5000211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Mathew, M.; Schroeder, L.W.; Dickens, B.; Brown, W.E. Crystal-structure of Alpha-Ca3(Po4)2. Acta Crystallogr. Sec. B Struct. Sci. 1977, 33, 1325–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yashima, M.; Sakai, A.; Kamiyama, T.; Hoshikawa, A. Crystal structure analysis of beta-tricalcium phosphate Ca-3(PO4)(2) by neutron powder diffraction. J. Solid State Chem. 2003, 175, 272–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Rodriguez-Lorenzo, L.M.; Hart, J.N.; Gross, K.A. Structural and chemical analysis of well-crystallized hydroxyfluorapatites. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 8316–8320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Oyane, A.; Kim, H.-M.; Furuya, T.; Kokubo, T.; Miyazaki, T.; Nakamura, T. Preparation and assessment of revised simulated body fluids. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2003, 65, 188–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Papadopoulos, N.G.; Dedoussis, G.V.Z.; Spanakos, G.; Gritzapis, A.D.; Baxevanis, C.N.; Papamichail, M. An improved fluorescence assay for the determination of lymphocyte-mediated cytotoxicity using flow-cytometry. J. Immunol. Methods 1994, 177, 101–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Barkarmo, S.; Wennerberg, A.; Hoffman, M.; Kjellin, P.; Breding, K.; Handa, P.; Stenport, V. Nano-hydroxyapatite-coated PEEK implants: A pilot study in rabbit bone. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2013, 101, 465–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Landi, E.; Tampieri, A.; Celotti, G.; Belmonte, M.M.; Logroscino, G. Synthetic biomimetic nanostructured hydroxyapatite. Bioceramics 2005, 284, 949–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Dempster, D.W.; Compston, J.E.; Drezner, M.K.; Glorieux, F.H.; Kanis, J.A.; Malluche, H.; Meunier, P.J.; Ott, S.M.; Recker, R.R.; Parfitt, A.M. Standardized nomenclature, symbols, and units for bone histomorphometry: A 2012 update of the report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2013, 28, 2–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Materials 09 00763 g001 1024
Figure 1. XRD diffraction profiles of: (a) cement precursors with different Sr content (Sr/Ca: 0–5 mol %); (b) the corresponding hardened cements after 3 days of incubation at 37 °C. The • symbol indicates the peaks belonging to βTCP phase. In Figure 1a the non-indexed peaks address αTCP phase, whereas in Figure 1b, the HA phase.
Figure 1. XRD diffraction profiles of: (a) cement precursors with different Sr content (Sr/Ca: 0–5 mol %); (b) the corresponding hardened cements after 3 days of incubation at 37 °C. The • symbol indicates the peaks belonging to βTCP phase. In Figure 1a the non-indexed peaks address αTCP phase, whereas in Figure 1b, the HA phase.
Materials 09 00763 g001
Materials 09 00763 g002 1024
Figure 2. (a) Coherent domain size in Sr-HA phases along the ab plane and the c axis; and (b) distortion of the HA lattice with strontium doping.
Figure 2. (a) Coherent domain size in Sr-HA phases along the ab plane and the c axis; and (b) distortion of the HA lattice with strontium doping.
Materials 09 00763 g002
Materials 09 00763 g003 1024
Figure 3. Cohesion of the cements after 30 min of immersion in Hanks’ balanced salt solution at 37 °C. (a) Sr5 without alginate; and (b) Sr5 with alginate.
Figure 3. Cohesion of the cements after 30 min of immersion in Hanks’ balanced salt solution at 37 °C. (a) Sr5 without alginate; and (b) Sr5 with alginate.
Materials 09 00763 g003
Materials 09 00763 g004 1024
Figure 4. Progress of the transformation of αTCP precursors into HA over time, with and without alginate.
Figure 4. Progress of the transformation of αTCP precursors into HA over time, with and without alginate.
Materials 09 00763 g004
Materials 09 00763 g005 1024
Figure 5. SEM micrographs of (a) Sr0; (b) Sr2; and (c) Sr5 cements. Scale bar: 2 µm.
Figure 5. SEM micrographs of (a) Sr0; (b) Sr2; and (c) Sr5 cements. Scale bar: 2 µm.
Materials 09 00763 g005
Materials 09 00763 g006 1024
Figure 6. Effect of alginate on the compressive strength (a) and Young’s modulus (b) of Sr-doped cements after three days of immersion. * p < 0.5; ** p < 0.1; *** p < 0.01.
Figure 6. Effect of alginate on the compressive strength (a) and Young’s modulus (b) of Sr-doped cements after three days of immersion. * p < 0.5; ** p < 0.1; *** p < 0.01.
Materials 09 00763 g006
Materials 09 00763 g007 1024
Figure 7. Evaluation of Sr2 cement, compared with control cement: compressive strength (a) and porosity after three days of incubation (b). *** p < 0.01.
Figure 7. Evaluation of Sr2 cement, compared with control cement: compressive strength (a) and porosity after three days of incubation (b). *** p < 0.01.
Materials 09 00763 g007
Materials 09 00763 g008 1024
Figure 8. Cell viability analyzed by the live/dead assay: Calcein AM stains for live cells in green, EthD-1 stains for dead cells in red. (a) Sr0; (b) Sr2; and (c) Sr5 (scale bars: 100 µm); and analysis of cell morphology assessed by SEM: (d) MG63 grown for three days on Sr2 surface (scale bar: 50 µm) with a higher power view showing details of the cell plasma extensions (e) (scale bar: 20 µm).
Figure 8. Cell viability analyzed by the live/dead assay: Calcein AM stains for live cells in green, EthD-1 stains for dead cells in red. (a) Sr0; (b) Sr2; and (c) Sr5 (scale bars: 100 µm); and analysis of cell morphology assessed by SEM: (d) MG63 grown for three days on Sr2 surface (scale bar: 50 µm) with a higher power view showing details of the cell plasma extensions (e) (scale bar: 20 µm).
Materials 09 00763 g008
Materials 09 00763 g009 1024
Figure 9. Optical microscopic view of explanted Sr2 (a,b) and KyphOs (c,d) at four weeks after implantation. Cements and surrounding bone are indicated with white and black arrows, respectively. Scale bars (a,c = 2 mm; b,d = 100 µm).
Figure 9. Optical microscopic view of explanted Sr2 (a,b) and KyphOs (c,d) at four weeks after implantation. Cements and surrounding bone are indicated with white and black arrows, respectively. Scale bars (a,c = 2 mm; b,d = 100 µm).
Materials 09 00763 g009
Materials 09 00763 g010 1024
Figure 10. Histomorphometric data. The indicators BMCR and BPR-Le are explained in Table 4. * p < 0.5; ** p < 0.1.
Figure 10. Histomorphometric data. The indicators BMCR and BPR-Le are explained in Table 4. * p < 0.5; ** p < 0.1.
Materials 09 00763 g010
Materials 09 00763 g011 1024
Figure 11. XRD patterns of Sr2 and KyphOs FS cement. (a) Cements hardened in vitro; and (b) explanted samples treated with both cements. Peaks legend: αTCP (•), βTCP (□), HA (×), SrCO3 (*), Mg3(PO4)2 (○), MgHPO4 (+), aluminum of the sample-holder support (▲).
Figure 11. XRD patterns of Sr2 and KyphOs FS cement. (a) Cements hardened in vitro; and (b) explanted samples treated with both cements. Peaks legend: αTCP (•), βTCP (□), HA (×), SrCO3 (*), Mg3(PO4)2 (○), MgHPO4 (+), aluminum of the sample-holder support (▲).
Materials 09 00763 g011
Materials 09 00763 g012 1024
Figure 12. SEM images comparing the microstructure of Sr2 and the control cement after setting in vitro and in vivo. (a) Sr2 in vitro; (b) Sr2 in vivo; (c) KyphOs in vitro; and (d) KyphOs in vivo. Scale bars = 1 µm.
Figure 12. SEM images comparing the microstructure of Sr2 and the control cement after setting in vitro and in vivo. (a) Sr2 in vitro; (b) Sr2 in vivo; (c) KyphOs in vitro; and (d) KyphOs in vivo. Scale bars = 1 µm.
Materials 09 00763 g012
Table
Table 1. ICP analysis of the as-obtained Sr-αTCP precursors and final cements.
Table 1. ICP analysis of the as-obtained Sr-αTCP precursors and final cements.
Nominal Sr ConcentrationActual Composition
Sr/(Ca + Sr) (mol %)Ca/P (mol)(Sr + Ca)/P (mol)Sr/(Ca + Sr) (mol %)
01.511.510
21.441.461.8
51.401.464.9
Table
Table 2. Linear dependence of lattice parameters and volume vs. Strontium content: y = y0 + m·xSr. y0 refers to Sr-free composition, xsr: strontium content (%), m: extent of variation with the strontium content.
Table 2. Linear dependence of lattice parameters and volume vs. Strontium content: y = y0 + m·xSr. y0 refers to Sr-free composition, xsr: strontium content (%), m: extent of variation with the strontium content.
αTCPy0mR2
a12,849 Å0.00740.988
b27,340 Å0.01510.988
c15,217 Å0.00290.987
Beta angle126.30°0.016160.963
Cell volume4308 Å35.460.989
Cell volume [38]4318 Å34.86–
βTCPy0mR2
a10,414 Å0.00470.93
c37,341 Å0.012810.993
Cell volume3501 Å34.450.967
Cell volume [39]3507 Å34.90–
HAy0mR2
a9.45717 Å0.002740.997
c6.87681 Å0.003240.998
Cell volume532.8 Å30.560.998
Cell volume [40]528.0 Å30.85–
Cell volume [41]527.0 Å30.71–
Table
Table 3. Setting times of Sr-substituted formulations.
Table 3. Setting times of Sr-substituted formulations.
Setting SolutionCementTin (min)Tfin (min)
without AlginateSr010 ± 122 ± 3
Sr213 ± 130 ± 3
Sr523 ± 347 ± 3
with AlginateSr09 ± 217 ± 2
Sr211 ± 226 ± 3
Sr525 ± 351 ± 2
Table
Table 4. Parameters observed and evaluated in histomorphometric analysis.
Table 4. Parameters observed and evaluated in histomorphometric analysis.
ParameterAbbreviationFormula
Material PerimeterM-Pm–
Bone Material Contact LengthBMC-Le–
Bone Pores LengthBPo-Le–
Material DiameterM-Dm–
Bone Material Contact RateBMCR(BMC-Le/M-Pm) × 100
Bone Penetration Rate LengthBPR-Le(BPo-Le/(M-Dm/2)) × 100

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sprio, S.; Dapporto, M.; Montesi, M.; Panseri, S.; Lattanzi, W.; Pola, E.; Logroscino, G.; Tampieri, A. Novel Osteointegrative Sr-Substituted Apatitic Cements Enriched with Alginate. Materials 2016, 9, 763. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9090763

AMA Style

Sprio S, Dapporto M, Montesi M, Panseri S, Lattanzi W, Pola E, Logroscino G, Tampieri A. Novel Osteointegrative Sr-Substituted Apatitic Cements Enriched with Alginate. Materials. 2016; 9(9):763. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9090763

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sprio, Simone, Massimiliano Dapporto, Monica Montesi, Silvia Panseri, Wanda Lattanzi, Enrico Pola, Giandomenico Logroscino, and Anna Tampieri. 2016. "Novel Osteointegrative Sr-Substituted Apatitic Cements Enriched with Alginate" Materials 9, no. 9: 763. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9090763

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop