Synergistic Effects of Bioactive Glass on the Physicochemical Properties and In Vitro Bioactivity of 3D-Printed PCL Scaffolds
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
2.2. Synthesis and Characterization of 58S Bioactive Glass (BG)
2.3. Fabrication and Characterization of PCL/BG Composite Scaffolds
2.4. Scaffold In Vitro Degradation
2.5. Cell Experiment
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Morphology and Phase Analysis of BG
3.2. Ink Printability Evaluation
3.3. Analysis of Mechanical Properties of PCL/BG Composite Scaffolds
3.4. Porosity Analysis of the Composite Scaffolds
3.5. Hydrophilicity Analysis of the Composite Scaffolds
3.6. Water Retention Analysis of the Composite Scaffolds
3.7. Structural Analysis of the Pre-Mineralized Composite Scaffolds
3.8. Analysis of the Appearance and Morphology of Composite Scaffolds
3.9. Analysis of the Hydroxyapatite Formation Process in SBF Solution
3.10. Analysis of the Degradation Performance of the Composite Scaffolds
3.11. Effect of BG Content on Early Cell Adhesion and Morphology
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Schemitsch, E.H. Size Matters: Defining Critical in Bone Defect Size! J. Orthop. Trauma 2017, 31, S20–S22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Dimitriou, R.; Jones, E.; McGonagle, D.; Giannoudis, P.V. Bone regeneration: Current concepts and future directions. BMC Med. 2011, 9, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Geetha, M.; Singh, A.K.; Asokamani, R.; Gogia, A.K. Ti based biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopaedic implants—A review. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2009, 54, 397–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- James, A.W.; LaChaud, G.; Shen, J.; Asatrian, G.; Nguyen, V.; Zhang, X.; Ting, K.; Soo, C. A Review of the Clinical Side Effects of Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2. Tissue Eng. Part. B Rev. 2016, 22, 284–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Carragee, E.J.; Hurwitz, E.L.; Weiner, B.K. A critical review of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 trials in spinal surgery: Emerging safety concerns and lessons learned. Spine J. 2011, 11, 471–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hutmacher, D.W. Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials 2000, 21, 2529–2543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Salgado, A.J.; Coutinho, O.P.; Reis, R.L. Bone tissue engineering: State of the art and future trends. Macromol. Biosci. 2004, 4, 743–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- O’Brien, F.J. Biomaterials & scaffolds for tissue engineering. Mater. Today 2011, 14, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Rezwan, K.; Chen, Q.Z.; Blaker, J.J.; Boccaccini, A.R. Biodegradable and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2006, 27, 3413–3431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Du, X.Y.; Wei, D.X.; Huang, L.; Zhu, M.; Zhang, Y.P.; Zhu, Y.F. 3D printing of mesoporous bioactive glass/silk fibroin composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C-Mater. Biol. Appl. 2019, 103, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ilyas, R.A.; Zuhri, M.Y.M.; Norrrahim, M.N.F.; Misenan, M.S.M.; Jenol, M.A.; Samsudin, S.A.; Nurazzi, N.M.; Asyraf, M.R.M.; Supian, A.B.M.; Bangar, S.P.; et al. Natural Fiber-Reinforced Polycaprolactone Green and Hybrid Biocomposites for Various Advanced Applications. Polymers 2022, 14, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Zargar Kharazi, A.; Hosseini, E.; Shafaat, A.; Fathi, M.H. Optimization of the Manufacturing Process and Mechanical Evaluation of a Functionally Graded Biodegradable Composite Screw for Orthopedic Applications. J. Med. Signals Sens. 2023, 13, 300–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Gharibshahian, M.; Salehi, M.; Beheshtizadeh, N.; Kamalabadi-Farahani, M.; Atashi, A.; Nourbakhsh, M.S.; Alizadeh, M. Recent advances on 3D-printed PCL-based composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2023, 11, 1168504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Mahmoodiyan Najafabadi, F.; Karbasi, S.; Benisi, S.Z.; Shojaei, S.; Poursamar, S.A.; Nasr Azadani, R. Evaluation of the effects of alumina nanowire on 3D printed polycaprolactone/magnetic mesoporous bioactive glass scaffold for bone tissue engineering applications. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2023, 303, 127616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Borhan, S.; Hesaraki, S.; Shahrezaee, M. Evaluation of 3D printed polycaprolactone/tetracalcium phosphate nanocomposite as potential scaffold for bone tissue engineering. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2025, 36, 1130–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Jalali Dehkordi, M.; Bahrami, A.; Emadi, R.; Khodaei, M. On the implications of Si3N4 nanoparticle addition for the structural, mechanical, and biomedical properties of 3D-printed polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration purposes. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2025, 38, 1921–1933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Emadi, H.; Karevan, M.; Masoudi Rad, M.; Sadeghzade, S.; Pahlevanzadeh, F.; Khodaei, M.; Khayatzadeh, S.; Lotfian, S. Bioactive and Biodegradable Polycaprolactone-Based Nanocomposite for Bone Repair Applications. Polymers 2023, 15, 3617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Montanheiro, T.L.d.A.; Schatkoski, V.M.; de Menezes, B.R.C.; Pereira, R.M.; Ribas, R.G.; de Freitas, A.d.S.M.; Lemes, A.P.; Fernandes, M.H.F.V.; Thim, G.P. Recent progress on polymer scaffolds production: Methods, main results, advantages and disadvantages. Express Polym. Lett. 2022, 16, 197–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Varlik, E.; Viviant, L.; Kurtuldu, F.; Nawaz, Q.; Chen, S.; Kraxner, J.; Galusek, D.; Michálek, M.; Boccaccini, A.R. Bioactive glass (BG) particle shape affects the mechanical and biological properties of PLA/BG scaffolds for bone regeneration. Mater. Lett. 2026, 403, 139383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Boschetto, F.; Ngoc Doan, H.; Phong Vo, P.; Zanocco, M.; Zhu, W.; Sakai, W.; Adachi, T.; Ohgitani, E.; Tsutsumi, N.; Mazda, O.; et al. Antibacterial and Osteoconductive Effects of Chitosan/Polyethylene Oxide (PEO)/Bioactive Glass Nanofibers for Orthopedic Applications. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 2360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Parvinnasab, A.; Rostami, S.; Namdar, A.; Salahinejad, E.; Taghvaei, A.H.; Abdi, S.; Rajabi, S.; Tayebi, L. Balanced enhancement of antibacterial activity and biocompatibility in chitosan-vancomycin 3D-printed scaffolds through mesoporous bioactive glass addition. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2025, 105, 106637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Jones, J.R. Reprint of: Review of bioactive glass: From Hench to hybrids. Acta Biomater. 2015, 23, S53–S82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Sepulveda, P.; Jones, J.R.; Hench, L.L. Characterization of melt-derived 45S5 and sol-gel-derived 58S bioactive glasses. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2001, 58, 734–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Boccaccini, A.R.; Erol, M.; Stark, W.J.; Mohn, D.; Hong, Z.K.; Mano, J.F. Polymer/bioactive glass nanocomposites for biomedical applications: A review. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2010, 70, 1764–1776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Roether, J.A.; Boccaccini, A.R.; Hench, L.L.; Maquet, V.; Gautier, S.; Jérôme, R. Development and in vitro characterisation of novel bioresorbable and bioactive composite materials based on polylactide foams and Bioglass® for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials 2002, 23, 3871–3878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Berthelot, T.; Lebullenger, R.; Brezulier, D.; Tricot, S.; Cammas-Marion, S.; Lefeuvre, B.; Lucas, A. Investigating the influence of sol-gel bioactive glass 92S6 P123 on 3D-Printed scaffold fabrication. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2025, 168, 107041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Janmohammadi, M.; Nourbakhsh, M.S.; Bahraminasab, M. 3D printed polycaprolactone scaffold incorporated with tragacanth gum/bioactive glass and cellulose nanocrystals for bone tissue engineering. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 305, 141114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Yang, Z.; He, X.; Chen, Y.; Zhu, M.; Xu, P. 3D-printed piezoelectric scaffolds composed of uniform core-shell structured BaTiO3@ bioactive glasses particles for bone regeneration. Ceram. Int. 2024, 50, 18303–18311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Li, R.; Clark, A.E.; Hench, L.L. An investigation of bioactive glass powders by sol-gel processing. J. Appl. Biomater. 1991, 2, 231–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Agrawal, C.M.; Ray, R.B. Biodegradable polymeric scaffolds for musculoskeletal tissue engineering. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2001, 55, 141–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kokubo, T.; Takadama, H. How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity? Biomaterials 2006, 27, 2907–2915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Editor’s Comment on: Review of bioactive glass: From Hench to hybrids. Acta Biomater. 2015, 23, S52. [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Eqtesadi, S.; Motealleh, A.; Miranda, P.; Pajares, A.; Lemos, A.; Ferreira, J.M.F. Robocasting of 45S5 bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2014, 34, 113–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bednarzig, V.; Schrüfer, S.; Schneider, T.C.; Schubert, D.W.; Detsch, R.; Boccaccini, A.R. Improved 3D Printing and Cell Biology Characterization of Inorganic-Filler Containing Alginate-Based Composites for Bone Regeneration: Particle Shape and Effective Surface Area Are the Dominant Factors for Printing Performance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 4750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Raggio, J.I.C.; Pardo, M.; Nunez, P.; Millan, C.; Siqueira, G.; Palza, H.; Vivanco, J.F.; Aiyangar, A.K. Effect of Processing Parameters on the Printability and Mechano-Biological Properties of Polycaprolactone-Bioactive Glass Composites for 3D-Printed Scaffold Fabrication. Polymers 2025, 17, 1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Fu, S.Y.; Feng, X.Q.; Lauke, B.; Mai, Y.W. Effects of particle size, particle/matrix interface adhesion and particle loading on mechanical properties of particulate-polymer composites. Compos. Pt. B-Eng. 2008, 39, 933–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tamayo-Vegas, S.; Muhsan, A.; Liu, C.; Tarfaoui, M.; Lafdi, K. The Effect of Agglomeration on the Electrical and Mechanical Properties of Polymer Matrix Nanocomposites Reinforced with Carbon Nanotubes. Polymers 2022, 14, 1842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Karageorgiou, V.; Kaplan, D. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials 2005, 26, 5474–5491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Trachtenberg, J.E.; Mountziaris, P.M.; Miller, J.S.; Wettergreen, M.; Kasper, F.K.; Mikos, A.G. Open-source three-dimensional printing of biodegradable polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2014, 102, 4326–4335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Cheng, S.Y.; Chiang, Y.L.; Chang, Y.H.; Thissen, H.; Tsai, S.W. An aqueous-based process to bioactivate poly(ε-caprolactone)/mesoporous bioglass composite surfaces by prebiotic chemistry-inspired polymer coatings for biomedical applications. Colloid. Surf. B-Biointerfaces 2021, 205, 111913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Dziadek, M.; Dziadek, K.; Checinska, K.; Zagrajczuk, B.; Cholewa-Kowalska, K. Bioactive Glasses Modulate Anticancer Activity and Other Polyphenol-Related Properties of Polyphenol-Loaded PCL/Bioactive Glass Composites. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2024, 16, 24261–24273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mosca Balma, A.; Pedraza, R.; Roato, I.; Orrico, C.; Meinardi, S.; Bertinetti, S.; Genova, T.; Gautier di Confiengo, G.; Faga, M.G.; Duraccio, D.; et al. Early Biological Response to Poly(ε-caprolactone) PCL—Bioactive Glass Composites Obtained by 3D Printing as Bone Substitutes. Polymers 2025, 17, 2229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bosworth, L.A.; Downes, S. Physicochemical characterisation of degrading polycaprolactone scaffolds. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2010, 95, 2269–2276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hench, L.L. The story of Bioglass®. J. Mater. Sci.-Mater. Med. 2006, 17, 967–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Woodruff, M.A.; Hutmacher, D.W. The return of a forgotten polymer-Polycaprolactone in the 21st century. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2010, 35, 1217–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hoppe, A.; Güldal, N.S.; Boccaccini, A.R. A review of the biological response to ionic dissolution products from bioactive glasses and glass-ceramics. Biomaterials 2011, 32, 2757–2774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Distler, T.; Fournier, N.; Grünewald, A.; Polley, C.; Seitz, H.; Detsch, R.; Boccaccini, A.R. Polymer-Bioactive Glass Composite Filaments for 3D Scaffold Manufacturing by Fused Deposition Modeling: Fabrication and Characterization. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]














| Sample | PCL (g) | BG (g) | CHCl3 (mL) | DMSO (mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pure PCL | 2 | 0 | 6.8 | 0.2 |
| PCL/10%BG | 2 | 0.222 | 6.8 | 0.2 |
| PCL/20%BG | 2 | 0.500 | 6.8 | 0.2 |
| PCL/30%BG | 2 | 0.857 | 6.8 | 0.2 |
| PCL/40%BG | 2 | 1.333 | 6.8 | 0.2 |
| Sample | Tm (°C) | ΔHm (J/g) | Xc (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pure PCL | 72.83 | 71.80 | 51.47 |
| PCL/10%BG | 70.96 | 57.94 | 46.15 |
| PCL/20%BG | 69.64 | 51.21 | 45.89 |
| PCL/30%BG | 67.91 | 42.40 | 43.42 |
| PCL/40%BG | 65.76 | 30.33 | 36.23 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Yang, B.; Wang, R.; Yang, G.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, X. Synergistic Effects of Bioactive Glass on the Physicochemical Properties and In Vitro Bioactivity of 3D-Printed PCL Scaffolds. Materials 2026, 19, 1740. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19091740
Yang B, Wang R, Yang G, Zhang Z, Chen X. Synergistic Effects of Bioactive Glass on the Physicochemical Properties and In Vitro Bioactivity of 3D-Printed PCL Scaffolds. Materials. 2026; 19(9):1740. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19091740
Chicago/Turabian StyleYang, Bo, Runhua Wang, Guang Yang, Zejia Zhang, and Xiaohong Chen. 2026. "Synergistic Effects of Bioactive Glass on the Physicochemical Properties and In Vitro Bioactivity of 3D-Printed PCL Scaffolds" Materials 19, no. 9: 1740. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19091740
APA StyleYang, B., Wang, R., Yang, G., Zhang, Z., & Chen, X. (2026). Synergistic Effects of Bioactive Glass on the Physicochemical Properties and In Vitro Bioactivity of 3D-Printed PCL Scaffolds. Materials, 19(9), 1740. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19091740
