Next Article in Journal
Strengthening Copper Nano-Solder Pastes with Group IV 2D Materials: A Molecular Dynamics Insight
Previous Article in Journal
Study on the Mechanical Property Degradation Laws of 6061-T6 Aluminum Alloy Under the Synergistic Effect of Corrosion and Cyclic Loading
Previous Article in Special Issue
Low-Cost and High-Strength Titanium–Zirconium–Oxygen Alloy Prepared by Spark Plasma Sintering
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Research on Multiscale Characterization and Computational Modeling/Simulation of Metallic Materials

1
School of Mechanical, Materials, Mechatronic and Biomedical Engineering, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
2
College of Chemical Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2026, 19(7), 1417; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19071417
Submission received: 21 March 2026 / Accepted: 30 March 2026 / Published: 2 April 2026
Metallic materials are fundamental to strategic sectors such as aerospace and energy systems. Understanding the cross-scale relationship between microstructure and macroscopic service performance has long been a central issue in materials science. With the rapid development of multiscale characterization techniques and computational modeling and simulation, the traditional trial-and-error paradigm in metallic materials development is being progressively transformed. A systematic research framework has emerged, covering atomic-scale defect evolution [1,2,3,4], mesoscale microstructural evolution [5,6,7], macroscopic mechanical performance [8,9,10], and artificial intelligence-assisted materials design [11,12,13,14]. These advances provide strong support for the development of high-performance metallic materials, process optimization, and service reliability evaluation. This Special Issue (SI)—entitled “Multiscale Characterization and Computational Modeling/Simulation of Metallic Materials”—presents recent advances in theoretical analysis, experimental characterization, and computational simulation of metallic materials. This editorial summarizes the fifteen contributions included in the SI.
Macroscopic mechanical properties remain key indicators for evaluating the engineering performance of metallic materials. These properties are typically characterized using experimental techniques such as in situ slow strain rate tensile testing [15,16,17] and room-temperature compression testing [18], which enable the quantitative evaluation of strength, ductility, and strain-hardening behavior [19]. Zhang et al. [20] conducted eighteen single-factor experiments and showed that discontinuous scanning tracks and lack-of-fusion defects occurred when laser power was below 800 W or the defocus distance reached −5 mm, while scanning speed was identified as the most critical parameter influencing thermal history. Based on upsetting and hot rolling experiments, Cojocaru et al. [21] reported that increasing deformation temperature or impact energy significantly enhanced the deformation degree, whereas deformation resistance and mechanical work decreased. Xu et al. [22] investigated hydrogen embrittlement using electrochemical cathodic hydrogen charging combined with slow strain rate tensile testing and revealed a non-monotonic temperature dependence, with 308 K identified as a critical threshold.
The macroscopic behavior of metallic materials originates from mesoscale microstructural characteristics, making microstructural characterization essential for understanding the underlying mechanisms. Advanced techniques, including scanning electron microscopy (SEM), electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) [23,24,25,26], enable detailed analyses of grain refinement, grain boundary evolution, phase transformation, second-phase distribution, and texture development [27,28,29]. Ni et al. [30], using EBSD and microhardness measurements, demonstrated that focused high-pressure torsion (HPT) deformation refined grains through repeated elongation and fragmentation processes, accompanied by a nonlinear increase in microhardness. Wan et al. [31], through OM, SEM/EDS, and XRD analyses, observed that Ca suppressed grain growth and promoted the transformation of the β-Mg17Al12 phase into a Ca- and Sn-containing blocky structure distributed along grain boundaries. Xiang et al. [32] reported that spark plasma sintering completely decomposed TiO2, allowing oxygen atoms to dissolve into the Ti-Zr matrix. Xu et al. [33] observed using metallographic optical microscopy that the phase compositions of ten types of bcc steels consisted of ferrite and pearlite, martensite, or spheroidal cementite. Hardness tests further showed that microhardness decreased with increasing indentation depth, which was consistent with the indentation size effect.
From atomic interactions to macroscopic engineering behavior, cross-scale computational modeling and simulation [34,35,36,37,38] have become powerful tools for revealing constitutive mechanisms and predicting material performance. Zheng et al. [39], using molecular dynamics simulations, investigated irradiation-induced defect evolution in single-crystal and bicrystal tungsten under different temperatures and primary knock-on atom (PKA) energies. The results showed that grain boundaries hindered the recombination of interstitial atoms and vacancies, while vacancies in bicrystals tended to form larger clusters. Wang et al. [40] employed finite element simulations and demonstrated that a 10–15 nm austenite layer improved fracture toughness by altering crack propagation paths and delaying crack growth, whereas crack orientation had only a minor influence. Tian et al. [41] simulated the leakage and diffusion behavior of buried pure hydrogen pipelines using ANSYS Fluent 2023R2. Their results clarified that hydrogen migration was restricted when the leakage aperture was ≤2 mm, while the hazardous zone expanded nonlinearly when the pressure exceeded 2 MPa. An SQP optimization prediction model was also constructed, achieving a mean absolute error below 10%. Tian et al. [42] conducted transient numerical simulations of hydrogen–methane mixing in T-type pipelines using ANSYS Fluent. They found that increasing the hydrogen proportion shortened the mixing distance but prolonged the total mixing time, whereas increasing the methane flow rate reduced the overall mixing time but required a longer pipeline for complete mixing.
Microstructural evolution and failure processes in metallic materials are essentially macroscopic manifestations of coupled atomic-, mesoscale-, and macroscale interactions under multiple physical fields [43,44,45]. Consequently, characterization or modeling at a single scale often cannot fully reveal the intrinsic relationships among composition, structure, and performance. Integrated multiscale experimental and computational approaches are therefore essential. Trusov et al. [46] developed a multiscale recrystallization model demonstrating that sub-grain coalescence acted as a dynamic recovery mechanism and competed energetically with recrystallization nucleation. Focusing on corrosion in magnesium alloys, Horstemeyer et al. [47] established a quantitative model incorporating multiple corrosion mechanisms based on internal state variable theory and multiscale modeling concepts, enabling corrosion behavior to be predicted directly from elemental composition.
With the rapid development of materials data science, artificial intelligence and machine learning [48,49] have emerged as promising approaches for addressing the long development cycles and high costs associated with conventional materials research. Essa et al. [50] proposed an artificial neural network (ANN) model with a 2-8-4 architecture capable of reliably predicting the mechanical properties of friction stir welded AA5754-H24 aluminum alloy joints, achieving higher prediction accuracy for tensile strength, elongation, and weld nugget zone hardness than for thermo-mechanically affected zone hardness. Román-Sedano et al. [51] developed an ANN-based predictive model using experimentally derived variables and analyzed the relative importance of the inputs using the Garson algorithm, achieving correlation coefficients of 0.96 and 0.80 for predicting the effective diffusion coefficient and steady-state flux, respectively.
With continued methodological advances, future research on metallic materials will increasingly emphasize the integration of multiscale experiments, computational simulations, and data-driven methods. On the one hand, multiscale characterization techniques are expected to evolve toward in situ and dynamic capabilities. Techniques such as in situ SEM, TEM, and in situ XRD thermodynamic analysis [52,53] will enable real-time observation of microstructural evolution during service. On the other hand, high-fidelity cross-scale coupling of physical models should be strengthened by integrating computational frameworks such as density functional theory, molecular dynamics, and crystal plasticity finite element methods [54,55], enabling more accurate prediction of material performance throughout the service lifecycle. In addition, deeper integration between physics-based modeling and machine learning should be promoted, particularly in emerging areas such as physics-informed neural networks and machine-learning-based interatomic potentials [56,57].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Shapeev, A.V. Moment tensor potentials: A class of systematically improvable interatomic potentials. Multiscale Model. Simul. 2016, 14, 1153–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sharifi, H.; Ding, H.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, B.; Meng, W.J.; Meng, A.C.; Wick, C.D. How compositional segregation can enhance the strength of complex concentrated alloys at the atomic level. Acta Mater. 2025, 302, 121666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Reiners-Sakic, A.; Schnitzer, R.; Holec, D. DFT and MLIP study of solute segregation to coherent and semi-coherent α-Fe/Fe3C interfaces. arXiv 2026, arXiv:2602.14603v1. [Google Scholar]
  4. Sim, E.S.; Yi, G.S.; Je, M.; Lee, Y.; Chung, Y.C. Understanding the anchoring behavior of titanium carbide-based MXenes depending on the functional group in Li–S batteries: A density functional theory study. J. Power Sources 2017, 342, 64–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, S.; Lin, X.; Wang, L.; Yu, X.; Hu, Y.; Yang, H.; Huang, W. Strengthening mechanisms in selective laser-melted Inconel718 superalloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2021, 812, 141145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ni, K.; Ku, M.H.; Tseng, Y.J.; Yen, H.W.; Wu, M.W. Identification of prior β grains of additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V alloy using electron backscatter diffraction. Mater. Lett. 2022, 324, 132758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Baek, M.S.; Kim, K.S.; Park, T.W.; Ham, J.; Lee, K.A. Quantitative phase analysis of martensite-bainite steel using EBSD and its microstructure, tensile and high-cycle fatigue behaviors. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2020, 785, 139375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zou, X.W.; Han, W.Z.; Ma, E. Uncovering the intrinsic high fracture toughness of titanium via lowered oxygen impurity content. Adv. Mater. 2024, 36, 2408286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yi, M.; Zhang, P.; Deng, S.; Xue, H.; Yang, C.; Liu, F.; Sun, J. Atomic-scale compositional complexity ductilizes eutectic phase towards creep-resistant Al-Ce alloys with improved fracture toughness. Acta Mater. 2024, 276, 120133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Deng, D.; Peng, R.L.; Moverare, J. High temperature mechanical integrity of selective laser melted alloy 718 evaluated by slow strain rate tests. Int. J. Plast. 2021, 140, 102974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Song, K.; Zhao, R.; Liu, J.; Wang, Y.; Lindgren, E.; Wang, Y.; Chen, S.; Xu, K.; Liang, T.; Ying, P.; et al. General-purpose machine-learned potential for 16 elemental metals and their alloys. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 10208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yao, Y.; Cappola, J.; Kethamukkala, K.; Gu, Y.; Li, L. Machine Learning-Enhanced Multiscale Material Mechanics Modeling for Complex Alloys. Acc. Mater. Res. 2026, 7, 234–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pei, C.; Gao, Q. A novel model to predict oxidation behavior of superalloys based on machine learning. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2025, 235, 232–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Shen, C.; Wang, C.; Wei, X.; Li, Y.; van der Zwaag, S.; Xu, W. Physical metallurgy-guided machine learning and artificial intelligent design of ultrahigh-strength stainless steel. Acta Mater. 2019, 179, 201–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lee, S.; Kim, J.; Park, S. Hydrogen Embrittlement Behavior of API X70 Linepipe Steel under Ex Situ and In Situ Hydrogen Charging. Materials 2024, 17, 4887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Xia, H.; Li, L.; Tan, C.; Yang, J.; Li, H.; Song, W.; Zhang, K.; Wang, Q.; Ma, N. In situ SEM study on tensile fractured behavior of Al/steel laser welding-brazing interface. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2024, 224, 111320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dong, L.; Zhang, G.; Li, S.; Wu, C.; Wang, H.; Zheng, H.; Wang, Q. Insights into the stress corrosion cracking of M54 ultra-high-strength steel in the marine environments at varying temperatures by comparison of slow strain rate tensile and crack growth tests. Corros. Sci. 2024, 241, 112543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, A.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, H.; Sun, H.; Li, Y. Effect of cyclic compression on the micromechanical properties of a Zr-based metallic glass. Front. Mater. 2024, 11, 1401094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Hua, L.; Huang, F.; Ji, K.; Chen, Y.; Mao, J. Deformation behavior and microstructural evolution of Ti-6Al-4V alloy under compression with confining pressure. Int. J. Plast. 2026, 198, 104610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, J.; Cao, Y.; Wang, H.; Shi, T.; Su, B.; Zhang, L. Effect of annular laser metal deposition (ALMD) process parameters on track geometry and thermal history on Ti6Al4v alloy clad. Materials 2023, 16, 4062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cojocaru, V.D.; Șerban, N.; Cojocaru, E.M.; Zărnescu-Ivan, N. High-Temperature Deformation Behaviour of UNS S32750 Super Duplex Stainless Steel (SDSS) Alloy. Materials 2024, 17, 5151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Xu, C.; Wang, F.; Li, J. The Influence of Hydrogen-Charging Current Density and Temperature on Hydrogen Permeation and Hydrogen Embrittlement Susceptibility of 4130X Steel. Materials 2025, 18, 3448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Wang, H. Ex situ and in situ TEM investigations of carbide precipitation in a 10Cr martensitic steel. J. Mater. Sci. 2018, 53, 7845–7856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, X.; Zhang, X.; Du, Y.; Li, S.; Chen, H.; Li, K.; Chen, W. Insights into microstructural stability and embrittlement of TC25 high temperature titanium alloy subjected to thermal exposure. Mater. Charact. 2024, 210, 113820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Xie, Y.; Zhao, P.; Tong, Y.; Tan, J.; Sun, B.; Cui, Y.; Tu, S. Precipitation and heterogeneous strengthened CoCrNi-based medium entropy alloy with excellent strength-ductility combination from room to cryogenic temperatures. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 2022, 65, 1780–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Williams, R.J.; Al-Lami, J.; Hooper, P.A.; Pham, M.S.; Davies, C.M. Creep deformation and failure properties of 316 L stainless steel manufactured by laser powder bed fusion under multiaxial loading conditions. Addit. Manuf. 2021, 37, 101706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Carneiro, Í.; Simões, S. Recent advances in EBSD characterization of metals. Metals 2020, 10, 1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bai, Y.; Zhang, R.; Cui, C.; Zhou, Y.; Sun, X. In-situ observation of Ni-Co based wrought superalloy high-temperature deformation: Lattice rotation and grain boundary response. Mater. Res. Lett. 2024, 12, 869–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhou, Q.; Ding, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Wei, X.; Zhang, Z.; Bei, H. The application of in situ TEM on the grain boundary brittleness of precipitation-strengthened Ni-based superalloys: Recent progress and perspective. Front. Met. Alloys 2022, 1, 1016638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ni, H.; Ding, C.; Wang, H.; Lv, S.; Wang, X.; Liu, Y. The evolutions of microstructure, texture and hardness of A1050 deformed by HPT at the transition area. Materials 2023, 16, 4686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wan, X.; Kang, C.; Tian, Q.; Zhou, J.; Qian, S.; Ma, C. Effect of Ca content on electrochemical discharge and corrosion performance of Mg-6Al-1Sn alloy anodes for Mg-air batteries. Materials 2025, 18, 1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Xiang, H.; Wu, Q.; You, W.; Cai, X.; Zhao, W.; Huang, Y.; Wu, C. Low-Cost and High-Strength Titanium–Zirconium–Oxygen Alloy Prepared by Spark Plasma Sintering. Material 2025, 18, 5138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Xu, A.; Song, X.; Ye, M.; Wan, Y.; Zhang, C. Microhardness Variation with Indentation Depth for Body-Centered Cubic Steels Pertinent to Grain Size and Ferrite Content. Materials 2024, 17, 2371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Dong, H.; Chen, Y.; Wu, D.; Ma, H.; Wang, Q.; Feng, Z.; Su, R. Molecular dynamics simulation of tensile properties of nickel-based superalloy with temperature and Co. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2024, 326, 129635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chen, X.; Deng, Y.; Qi, H.; Wang, J.; Wang, Q.; Zu, X.; Xiao, H. The design of Mg-based lightweight high entropy alloys for hydrogen storage via first-principles calculations. J. Alloys Compd. 2025, 1044, 184251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chen, W.; Li, X. Structure and mechanical properties of novel lightweight refractory high entropy alloys NbMoTiZr-(Al/V): A combined first principles and experimental study. J. Alloys Compd. 2024, 973, 172855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sirinakorn, T.; Uthaisangsuk, V. Investigation of damage initiation in high-strength dual-phase steels using cohesive zone model. Int. J. Damage Mech. 2018, 27, 409–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hojjati-Talemi, R.; Cooreman, S.; Van Hoecke, D. Finite element simulation of dynamic brittle fracture in pipeline steel: A XFEM-based cohesive zone approach. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part L J. Mater. Des. Appl. 2018, 232, 357–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zheng, R.; Xuan, W.; Xie, J.; Chen, S.; Yang, L.; Zhang, L. The Evolution of Structural Defects under Irradiation in W by Molecular Dynamics Simulation. Materials 2023, 16, 4414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, C.; Zhang, C.; Yang, Z.; Su, J.; Weng, Y. Analysis of fracture toughness in high Co–Ni secondary hardening steel using FEM. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2015, 646, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tian, Y.; Zhang, J.; Ren, G.; Deng, B. Numerical Investigation of Hydrogen Leakage Quantification and Dispersion Characteristics in Buried Pipelines. Materials 2025, 18, 4535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Tian, Y.; Tian, T.; Ren, G.; Zhang, J. Numerical simulation of hydrogen mixing process in t-junction natural gas pipeline. Materials 2025, 18, 1879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Li, S.; Xiao, Y.; Hu, R.; Mei, F.; Li, Y.; Chen, Z. Numerical Simulation and Experimental Study on the Influence of Scanning Strategy on Stress–Strain Behavior of GH3536 in Laser Powder Bed Fusion. Crystals 2026, 16, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chen, J.; Hou, Z.; Wang, Z.; Li, K.; Zou, P.; Dong, K.; Shi, G. Quantitative analysis of multiple deformation mechanisms in NiCrCoFe high-entropy alloy. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2024, 238, 112926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hasan, M.S.; Bayat, H.; de Jong, W.; Xu, W. Machine learning-enabled multiscale modeling of mechanical deformation of aluminum and Al-SiC nanocomposites. Mater. Des. 2025, 260, 115063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Trusov, P.; Kondratev, N.; Baldin, M.; Bezverkhy, D. A multilevel physically based model of recrystallization: Analysis of the influence of subgrain coalescence at grain boundaries on the formation of recrystallization nuclei in metals. Materials 2023, 16, 2810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Horstemeyer, M.F.; Song, W.; Cho, H.E.; Wipf, D.; Martin, H.J.; Francis, D.K.; Chaudhuri, S. A Multiscale Inelastic Internal State Variable Corrosion Model. Materials 2024, 17, 3995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Milyutin, V.A.; Bureš, R.; Fáberová, M.; Birčáková, Z.; Molčanová, Z.; Kunca, B.; Füzer, J. Machine learning assisted optimization of soft magnetic properties in ternary Fe–Si–Al alloys. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2024, 29, 5060–5073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kano, K.; Koga, K. Deep learning-assisted high-throughput screening of Fe–Co–Ni ternary system using density functional calculations. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2024, 244, 113211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Essa, A.R.; Ahmed, M.M.; Aboud, A.R.; Alyamani, R.; Sebaey, T.A. Prediction of tool eccentricity effects on the mechanical properties of friction stir welded AA5754-H24 aluminum alloy using ANN model. Materials 2023, 16, 3777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Román-Sedano, A.M.; Campillo, B.; Villalobos, J.C.; Castillo, F.; Flores, O. Hydrogen diffusion in nickel superalloys: Electrochemical permeation study and computational AI predictive modeling. Materials 2023, 16, 6622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Sang, L.; Lu, J.; Cheng, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Z. In Situ EBSD Study of Deformation Behavior at Grain Scale of Inconel 718 Alloy During Tensile Test at 650 °C. Materials 2025, 18, 1934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Pivak, Y.; Deen-van Rossum, C.; Andersen, M.; Pen, M.; Basak, S.; Eichel, R.A.; Pérez Garza, H. A Versatile MEMS-Based In Situ SEM Holder for Heating, Biasing, and Correlative Microstructural Characterization. Microsc. Microanal. 2025, 31, 048–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zirkle, T.; Zhu, T.; McDowell, D.L. Multiscale modeling of hydrogen-affected crack tip damage using fully coupled chemo-mechanical crystal plasticity framework for austenitic stainless steel. Int. J. Multiscale Comput. Eng. 2023, 21, 21–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhou, Z.Y.; Zheng, Q.Y.; Li, Y.; Ding, C.; Peng, G.J.; Piao, Z.Y. Research on the mechanism of the two-dimensional ultrasonic surface burnishing process to enhance the wear resistance for aluminum alloy. Friction 2024, 12, 490–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Pun, G.P.; Batra, R.; Ramprasad, R.; Mishin, Y. Physically informed artificial neural networks for atomistic modeling of materials. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Takamoto, M.; Zaverkin, V.; Niepert, M. Physics-Informed Weakly Supervised Learning for Interatomic Potentials. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2408.05215v2. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, R.; Li, J. Research on Multiscale Characterization and Computational Modeling/Simulation of Metallic Materials. Materials 2026, 19, 1417. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19071417

AMA Style

Wang R, Li J. Research on Multiscale Characterization and Computational Modeling/Simulation of Metallic Materials. Materials. 2026; 19(7):1417. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19071417

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Rui, and Jiaqing Li. 2026. "Research on Multiscale Characterization and Computational Modeling/Simulation of Metallic Materials" Materials 19, no. 7: 1417. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19071417

APA Style

Wang, R., & Li, J. (2026). Research on Multiscale Characterization and Computational Modeling/Simulation of Metallic Materials. Materials, 19(7), 1417. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19071417

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop