Next Article in Journal
Mechanically Referenced Early Acoustic Emission Indicators of Thermally Modified Deformation in S235 Structural Steel
Previous Article in Journal
Thermal-History-Mediated Defect–Microstructure–Property Evolution in Multi-Laser Powder Bed Fusion of TC11 Titanium Alloy Structures
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Characterization of Crack Evolution and Subsurface Damage in AA7075-T6, Anodized AA6061-T6, and Al-15 vol.% SiC T4 Composite Under Wear and Indentation Loading

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2026, 19(18), 3957; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19183957 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 14 August 2026 / Revised: 9 September 2026 / Accepted: 11 September 2026 / Published: 17 September 2026

Abstract

This study investigated the deformation behavior and damage evolution of AA7075-T6, Anodized AA6061-T6-T6 (oxide layer with an average thickness of 8.71 µm), and Al-15 vol.% SiC-T4 (particle size range of 3.1–8.3 µm) under scratch, Hertzian-type indentation, and nanoindentation loading conditions. Through controlled mechanical testing, the materials’ responses to varying test conditions were characterized in terms of penetration depth and width, resistance to deformation, and cracking mechanisms on surface and sub-surface. Results revealed that Al-15 vol.% SiC T4 exhibited the highest stability and scratch resistance due to the reinforcing effect of SiC particles, while AA7075-T6 demonstrated moderate strength with noticeable plastic deformation. Anodized AA6061-T6 showed enhanced surface hardness post processing but increased susceptibility to brittle cracking and coating delamination under higher loads and reciprocating passes. Findings indicated a transition from load-controlled to structure-controlled behavior at elevated forces, influenced by strain hardening and microstructural constraints. Hertzian-type indentation further highlighted differences in subsurface damage and crack propagation patterns among the materials. Holistically, the study established a clear correlation between microstructural features and mechanical performance, guiding material selection and surface engineering for improved wear and contact damage resistance.
Keywords: AA7075-T6; anodized AA6061-T6; Al-15 vol.% SiC T4 composite; multipass scratch; hertzian contact; nanoindentation AA7075-T6; anodized AA6061-T6; Al-15 vol.% SiC T4 composite; multipass scratch; hertzian contact; nanoindentation
Graphical Abstract

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sey, E.; Husnain, S.A.; Jarjoura, G.; Farhat, Z.N. Characterization of Crack Evolution and Subsurface Damage in AA7075-T6, Anodized AA6061-T6, and Al-15 vol.% SiC T4 Composite Under Wear and Indentation Loading. Materials 2026, 19, 3957. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19183957

AMA Style

Sey E, Husnain SA, Jarjoura G, Farhat ZN. Characterization of Crack Evolution and Subsurface Damage in AA7075-T6, Anodized AA6061-T6, and Al-15 vol.% SiC T4 Composite Under Wear and Indentation Loading. Materials. 2026; 19(18):3957. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19183957

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sey, Emmanuel, Syed Ali Husnain, George Jarjoura, and Zoheir N. Farhat. 2026. "Characterization of Crack Evolution and Subsurface Damage in AA7075-T6, Anodized AA6061-T6, and Al-15 vol.% SiC T4 Composite Under Wear and Indentation Loading" Materials 19, no. 18: 3957. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19183957

APA Style

Sey, E., Husnain, S. A., Jarjoura, G., & Farhat, Z. N. (2026). Characterization of Crack Evolution and Subsurface Damage in AA7075-T6, Anodized AA6061-T6, and Al-15 vol.% SiC T4 Composite Under Wear and Indentation Loading. Materials, 19(18), 3957. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19183957

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop