Next Article in Journal
Surface Layer Engineering of 3D-Printed PET-G: Effect of Printing Parameters on Surface Roughness and Wettability—Considerations for Tribological Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Polyethylenimine/Graphene Oxide Nanocomposite for Lightweight X-Ray Radiation Shielding in Aerospace Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Interface Behavior and Corrosion Study of MgO-Based Refractory Materials in Molten Pharmaceutical Waste Salts
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Thermal Shock Resistance Enhancement of Alumina-Based Castables by Incorporating Porous Alumina Spherical Aggregates

1
Henan Key Laboratory of High Temperature Functional Ceramics, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
2
Chengdu Futian High Temperature Materials Technology Co., Ltd., Chengdu 611300, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2026, 19(17), 3761; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19173761
Submission received: 15 July 2026 / Revised: 27 August 2026 / Accepted: 31 August 2026 / Published: 4 September 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in High-Temperature Ceramics and Refractory Materials)

Abstract

Chrome-containing corundum–spinel castables are the preferred materials for ladle purging plugs due to their excellent slag resistance, high mechanical strength, and good volume stability. However, their poor thermal shock resistance often leads to transverse cracking or thermal spalling, thereby limiting their service life improvement. Since aggregates typically constitute 70 wt% of castables, modifying the aggregates may be an effective strategy to enhance the thermal shock resistance. To this end, alumina spherical aggregates were prepared via a pan granulation technique using α-Al2O3 powders as the raw material and a ZnCl2 solution as the binder. The effects of the firing temperature on the physical properties and the microstructure of the as-fabricated aggregates were investigated, followed by an evaluation of their impact on castable performance. After firing at 1400 °C for 3 h, the resulting alumina spherical aggregates exhibited a porous interior and a dense exterior structure, with an apparent porosity of 27.21%, a water absorption capacity of 9.38%, and a crushing rate of 51.3%. When these aggregates were incorporated into castables, their apparent porosity increased, while the bulk density and the cold strength showed slight reductions; however, their thermal shock resistance was notably improved. Among the formulations tested, the castable containing 4% of 0.2–0 mm spherical aggregates exhibited the best thermal shock resistance, with a residual strength of 7.96 MPa and a strength retention rate of 27.85%.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

External ladle refining is essential for improving molten steel quality and developing new steel grades. Ladle bottom argon purging is a key method for achieving uniform composition and temperature, as well as facilitating inclusion removal [1,2,3]. As the direct functional component of the purging system, plug performance largely determines the refining efficiency and the ladle turnover rate [2,3,4]. Statistics show that premature plug damage increases refractory consumption, risks secondary pollution, and may even interrupt the refining process [4,5]. During the steel-making process, purging plugs endure harsh conditions: repeated thermal shocks from contact with molten steel (>1600 °C) and intermittent argon blowing, alongside high-temperature erosion, slag attack, and mechanical stress [4,5,6]. Moreover, cold argon passing through the ~1600 °C plug core creates a steep temperature gradient within the slit region. These factors collectively cause fracture failure and thermal spalling, reducing the plug service life [7,8,9,10]. To meet these demanding and severe requirements, purging plugs needed to be possessed of higher strength, good thermal shock resistance (labelled as TSR) and slag resistance.
Among Al2O3-SiO2, Al2O3, Al2O3-MgO, etc., castables, calcium aluminate cement (labelled as CAC) bonded chrome-containing corundum–spinel materials have become the preferred choice for purging plugs, owing to their high strength, excellent slag corrosion resistance, and good volume stability. These properties are attributed to the formation of Al2−xCrxO3, Ca4Al4CrO16, and Mg Al2−xCrxO4 solid solutions [8,9]. Nevertheless, in practice, these materials still suffer from typical failure modes such as thermal spalling, structural spalling, and steel penetration into the slits. However, the Cr2O3-containing plugs possess worse TSR in comparison with plugs without Cr2O3, thereby decreasing their service life and gas bubbling ability because of thermal spalling or fracture [9,10,11].
To date, various efforts have been made to improve the TSR of alumina–spinel purging plugs, such as introducing nano-alumina powders, zirconia, or calcium aluminate [12,13,14]. However, poor TSR remains a critical issue limiting any further extension of their service life. Given that aggregates account for up to 70 wt% of castables, modifying them offers a promising approach. Several studies [14,15,16,17,18,19,20] have improved TSR by incorporating different aggregates, including porous alumina, CaO·MgO·Al2O3, bonite (labelled as CA6), zirconia–alumina, resin-coated alumina, and alumina bubbles. Nevertheless, challenges such as high cost and complex procedures remain to be overcome.
Spherical aggregates offer advantages such as good flowability, low water demand, and reduced stress concentration due to their smooth edges, thereby enhancing the thermal shock resistance [21,22,23,24,25]. Thus, we proposed a technique combining a spherical shape with a porous structure, which may enhance the performance of purging plugs. To address these challenges, porous alumina spherical aggregates with a tailored structure were prepared and incorporated into alumina–spinel castables, and their effects on the properties of the castables were investigated in this work.

2. Experimental

2.1. Preparation of Alumina Spherical Aggregates

Alumina spherical aggregates (labelled as ASAs) were prepared from α-Al2O3 powders (99.6%, D50 = 5 μm, Macklin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) using an 8% ZnCl2 solution (10 mass%, Henan Tianma New Materials Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou, China) as a binder. After granulation (10 rpm), the spheres were dried at 110 °C for 24 h, sieved into three fractions (1–0.5, 0.5–0.2, and 0.2–0.09 mm), and fired at 1300–1500 °C for 3 h (see Figure 1). The vacuum evacuation method was employed for water absorption of ASAs according to Chinese standard GB/T 2999-2016 [26]. The residual mass ratio of ASAs was determined by reweighing 200 g ASAs after crushing.

2.2. Preparation of Alumina–Spinel Castables

Tabular alumina (Al2O3: 99.20%, 6–3 mm, 3–1 mm, 1–0.09 mm, Almatis Co. Ltd., Qingdao, China), white fused corundum powder (Al2O3: 99.0%, <0.088 mm, Henan Sicheng Grinding Technology Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou, China), fused spinel powder (<0.044 mm, Kaifeng Tenai Co., Ltd., Kaifeng, China), ultrafine alumina (Al2O3: 99.10%, D50 = 1.2 µm, Henan Tianma New Material Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou, China), chromium oxide powder (Cr2O3 > 98.0%, <20 µm, Henan Huaxian Jinlong Chemical Plant, Anyang, China), CAC (Secar 71, Imerys China Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), and ZnCl2 fines (AR, <0.044 mm, Macklin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) were applied as starting materials. The dispersant was 0.15% Castment FS 10 (BASF SE, Ludwigshafen, Germany). Effects of ASA particle size (1–0.5 mm, 0.5–0.2 mm, and 0.2–0 mm) and addition level (0, 2, 4, and 6 wt%) on the properties of the castables were investigated. The aggregate-to-matrix mass ratio was fixed at 70:30. The matrix was comprised of 12% fused white corundum, 8% fused spinel, 6% α- Al2O3 ultrafine powder, 2% Cr2O3, and 2% calcium aluminate cement. After weighing and mixing, water was added to prepare the castables, which were then cast into specimens of 150 × 25 × 25 mm. Following curing at room temperature and demolding, the samples were dried at 110 °C for 24 h and subsequently fired at 1100 °C, 1400 °C, and 1600 °C for 3 h.
Physical properties of the castables fired at 1100 °C, 1400 °C, and 1600 °C for 3 h, including bulk density (labelled as BD), apparent porosity (labelled as AP), cold modulus of rupture (labelled as CMOR), cold crushing strength (labelled as CCS), and permanent linear change (labelled as PLC), were measured according to Chinese standards (GB/T 5072-2023 [27], GB/T 3001-2017 [28], GB/T 2997-2015 [29], GB/T 5988-2022 [30] and GB/T 3000-2016 [31]). The hot modulus of rupture (labelled as HMOR) of the fired samples was measured at 1400 °C for 0.5 h. Thermal shock resistance (labelled as TSR) was evaluated via air-cooling (ΔT = 1100 °C, 3 cycles), and residual strength (labelled as CMORat) and residual strength ratio (labelled as RSR) were used to evaluate their TSR. Phase composition was analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD), while microstructures and cracks were observed using laser microscopy (OLS4100, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), scanning electron microscopy (SEM, ZEISS EVO HD15; ZEISS, Oberkochen, Germany) with energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) and laser microscopy.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Properties of Alumina Spherical Aggregates

Figure 2 presents the AP, the BD, the water absorption and the crushing rate of the spherical aggregates as a function of the firing temperature. As the temperature increases from 1300 °C to 1500 °C, the AP value decreases from 31.5% to 19.5%, while the BD value increases from 2.74 g/cm3 to 3.20 g/cm3 (Figure 2a). Concurrently, the water absorption capacity declines from 11.5% to 6.1% (Figure 2b). The residual mass rate of the ASAs after crushing rises significantly from 22.0% to 63.1% (Figure 2c), indicating a significant gain in their strength. However, excessive strength usually indicates a denser and more brittle structure, which can lower the fracture toughness and thus degrade the TSR. Therefore, a firing temperature of 1400 °C for 3 h was selected. The BD of the ASAs after firing at 1400 °C is 2.9 g/cm3, much lower than that of tabular alumina aggregates (about 3.58 g/cm3), indicating that the volume ratio of the fixed amount of the ASAs is much higher than that of tabular alumina. It will harm their strength but improve their TSR.
Pore formation in the ASAs arises from two sources: (1) moisture evaporation from the solution introduced during granulation, and (2) packing gaps between the α-Al2O3 particles during granulation. ZnCl2 influences the distribution, morphology, and size of these pores. As the firing temperature increases, the alumina particles bond more tightly, the internal gases are expelled, and both the apparent porosity and the water absorption capacity decrease.
The XRD and SEM analyses were conducted to investigate the phase composition and the microstructure of the 1–0.5 mm ASAs (Figure 3). As shown in Figure 3a, increasing the heat-treatment temperature does not significantly alter the phase composition. The primary crystalline phase remains corundum (ICDD No. 00-011-0661), along with a small amount of ZnAl2O4. This can be explained as follows. During drying, Zn(OH)2 forms via Reaction (1). Upon heating to 500 °C, Zn(OH)2 decomposes into ZnO and water vapor (Reaction (2)). Above 600 °C, ZnO can react with Al2O3 to form ZnAl2O4 (Reaction (3)).
ZnCl2 + 2H2O → Zn(OH)2 + 2HCl
Zn(OH)2 → ZnO + 2H2O
ZnO + Al2O3 → ZnAl2O4
Figure 3b presents an SEM image of a spherical aggregate fired at 1400 °C. The central part appears relatively loose, while the outer layer is denser. This core–shell structure arises from the decomposition of ZnCl2, which generates ZnO and HCl. ZnO reacts with Al2O3 to form ZnAl2O4, promoting interparticle bonding. Molten ZnCl2 (low melting point, about 290 °C) forms a liquid phase that facilitates particle adhesion and tends to volatilize or migrate toward the outer shell, densifying it. Meanwhile, gas volatilization and additive outflow leave the interior porous and loose. The dense outer layer reduces water absorption and demand during castable preparation, helping maintain its strength. In contrast, the loose interior buffers thermal shock via pores, thereby enhancing the castable’s TSR.

3.2. Effect of ASAs Addition on the Properties of the Castables

Figure 4 illustrates the effects of adding 1–0.5 mm ASAs on the physical properties of the castables. As the ASA content increases, the AP of both the dried and fired samples gradually increases while the BD decreases (Figure 4a,b). Among the samples fired at different temperatures, those sintered at 1400 °C exhibit the highest AP. Specifically, as the ASAs content rises from 0 to 6 wt%, the AP increases from 15.3% to 17.7% and the BD decreases from 3.22 g/cm3 to 3.16 g/cm3. This trend is attributed to the inherently higher porosity and lower density of the ASAs compared to that of the sample with tabular alumina aggregates. As shown in Figure 4c,d, the strength of the castables increases with ASAs content when fired at 1100 °C but decreases after firing at 1400 °C and 1600 °C. This reduction is primarily attributed to the ASAs’ porous structure, which lowers the particle strength compared to dense tabular alumina aggregates, and its spherical morphology, which reduces the effective load-bearing cross-section and increases local stress. Nevertheless, the overall strength loss remains modest due to the ASAs’ inherent strength and stress-buffering capability. Furthermore, the permanent linear change of the castables shows little variation with ASAs content at all firing temperatures (Figure 4e).
Figure 5 presents the variations in the AP, the CMOR, and the PLC of the castables containing 4% ASAs of different particle sizes after sintering. As shown in Figure 5a, the AP value gradually increases from 14.36% to 16.37% with decreasing particle size of the ASAs. Conversely, the change in the CMOR follows the opposite trend: as the ASAs particle size decreases, the cold strength slightly declines from 28.34 MPa to 27.32 MPa (Figure 5b). From Figure 5c, it can be observed that the linear shrinkage increases slightly with decreasing ASAs particle size. The samples with 0.2–0 mm ASAs addition possess a higher AP and a lower CMOR.
Figure 6 illustrates the effect of the ASAs with different particle sizes on the HMOR of the castables. As the ASAs content increases from 0% to 6%, the HMOR values gradually decrease, which is slightly decreased with the smaller sizes of ASAs particles. Notably, the samples containing 1–0.5 mm ASAs exhibit a higher HMOR value than those with smaller ASAs. Nevertheless, all the HMOR values of the 4% samples with different sizes of ASAs exceed 24 MPa, indicating that the castables with ASAs added still possess a relatively high hot strength, which is similar to the alumina–spinel castables without Cr2O3 addition [24]. A higher hot strength of the plugs is beneficial for the erosion resistance of the purging plug under service conditions, making their service life longer [24].
Figure 7 illustrates the effect of the content and grain size of the ASAs on the TSR of the castables. As shown in Figure 7, both the residual strength and the RSR gradually increase as the ASAs content rises from 0 to 4%, but they decrease when the content further increases to 6%. The optimal addition level is 4%, achieving residual strengths of 5.40 MPa, 6.31 MPa, and 7.95 MPa, and RSR values of 16.10%, 19.24%, and 27.85% for the different particle sizes. Moreover, a smaller ASAs particle size leads to a better TSR, with the best performance observed in the samples with 0.2–0 mm ASAs. This may be attributed to the larger number and more uniform distribution of the smaller particles within the castables, as well as their higher porosity.
To better understand the effect of the ASAs particle size on the TSR, an SEM microstructural analysis was performed on the castables containing ASAs (Figure 8). As presented in Figure 8, the spherical aggregates exhibit a loose interior and a dense exterior, a structure that buffers thermal stress via internal pores while maintaining relatively higher strength, thereby enhancing the TSR. Large particles, formed by the accumulation of smaller nucleated granules during granulation, contain larger interparticle pores that provide limited TSR improvement. In contrast, small particles feature micropores derived from micropowder stacking, thus they more effectively enhance the TSR of the specimens [25,32].
The laser microscope images and a schematic crack diagram of the sample containing 4% 1–0.5 mm ASAs after thermal shock are depicted in Figure 9. The Figure shows the reference sample containing tabular alumina aggregates, where the dense and angular tabular alumina particles are evenly distributed within the matrix. After thermal shock, large cracks propagating through the corundum particles are visible, leading to a notable reduction in material strength (Figure 9a,b). Large cracks are observed to propagate along the corundum particles (Figure 9c,d), increasing the crack path length and reducing damage to the material, thereby improving their TSR [18,20]. The reason can be ascribed to the distinct core–shell structure that can be observed in the ASAs particles, characterized by a relatively loose interior and a dense exterior.
The introduction of ASAs into alumina–spinel castables leads to notable changes in their physical and mechanical properties. Regarding their physical properties, the addition of ASAs gradually increases the AP and decreases the BD of the castables, regardless of the firing temperature of the ASAs. This trend is primarily attributed to the inherently higher porosity and lower density of the porous ASAs structure compared to the conventional dense tabular alumina aggregates. Consequently, the cold strength and the hot strength show a slight decline with increasing ASAs content. Despite this decrease, all the HMOR values exceed 24 MPa (Figure 6), indicating that the ASA-containing castables retain a rather higher hot strength. Notably, the samples containing 1–0.5 mm ASAs exhibit a relatively higher HMOR compared to those with finer ASAs particles. Regarding the TSR, the incorporation of ASAs significantly improves both the residual strength and the RSR of the castables. The optimal addition level is 4%, at which the highest TSR is achieved. Furthermore, smaller ASA particles (0.2–0 mm) yield a better TSR than larger ones. This improvement can be explained by the unique loose interior/dense exterior structure of the ASAs (Figure 3b and Figure 8), which buffers thermal stress through internal pores and deflects propagating cracks along the particle edges, extending the crack path and dissipating the thermal shock energy (Figure 9) [16,18,20]. Smaller particles are more uniformly distributed and present in greater numbers at the same addition level, further enhancing this toughening effect.
The enhanced TSR of the alumina–spinel castables containing porous spherical aggregates can be attributed to a synergistic combination of microstructural features. The core–shell structure of the porous spherical aggregates, comprising a porous interior and a dense exterior, modifies crack propagation through crack deflection, branching, and arrest at the shell–core interface. The porous interior dissipates fracture energy via microcracking and local deformation, effectively blunting the crack tip. Additionally, the pores within the aggregate interior accommodate thermal expansion mismatch stress, reducing the thermal expansion coefficient and inducing crack deflection. The spherical morphology further contributes by minimizing the stress concentration at the aggregate corners. Collectively, these mechanisms increase crack path tortuosity, dissipate thermal stress energy, and prevent catastrophic crack propagation, thereby improving thermal shock resistance.
The experimental results show that the ASAs offer a superior TSR: the 4% ASAs (0.2–0 mm) castable achieves a residual strength ratio (RSR) of 27.85%, outperforming alumina bubbles (16.36% [20]). Moreover, the simple pan granulation process makes ASAs a cost-effective alternative for industrial purging plug applications.

4. Conclusions

Alumina spherical aggregates were fabricated using ultrafine alumina as the starting material and a ZnCl2 solution as the binder, and the effects of the ASAs particle size (1–0.5 mm, 0.5–0.2 mm, and 0.2–0 mm) and addition amount (0, 2%, 4%, and 6%) on the properties of the castables were examined. The main findings are as follows. As the firing temperature increases, the apparent porosity of the alumina spherical aggregates decreases, while their bulk density and crushing rate increase. The resultant alumina spherical aggregates exhibit a flexible buffering structure with a loose interior and a dense exterior. When adding ASAs in the castables, upon increasing the ASAs content from 0% to 6%, it gradually raises the apparent porosity of the specimens and slightly reduces both the cold and hot strength. However, the residual strength and the residual strength ratio after thermal shock improve, reaching optimal levels at 4% ASAs addition. Among the tested particle sizes, the 0.2–0 mm spherical aggregate yields the best thermal shock resistance, which can be ascribed to the core–shell structure of the porous spherical aggregates, comprising a porous interior and a dense exterior, which modifies crack propagation through crack deflection and arrest at the shell–core interface.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.F. and Q.J.; Methodology, T.F.; Validation, Y.H. and H.C.; Investigation, T.F., W.X., H.C. and Q.C.; Resources, W.X., Q.C. and H.M.; Data curation, T.F. and Y.H.; Writing—original draft, T.F. and Q.J.; Visualization, T.F.; Supervision, H.M. and Q.J.; Project administration, Q.J.; Funding acquisition, Q.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors are grateful to the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52172029) and the Major Science and Technology Project of Yunnan Province (Grant No. 202502AB080185) for supporting this work.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors Ying Huang, Wei Xiong, and Qilong Chen were employed by the company Chengdu Futian High Temperature Materials Technology Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tripathi, P.K.; Kumar, D.S.; Sarkar, A.; Vishwanath, S.C. Optimization of bath mixing and steel cleanliness during steel refining through physical and mathematical modeling. Sādhanā 2021, 46, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  2. Barthel, H.; Hammerer, W.; Gortan, D.; Suppaner, M. Segment purging plugs for steel treatment in ladles. Taikabutsu 1996, 48, 535–536. [Google Scholar]
  3. Mohd, B.; Mishra, N.K.; Pani, K.C.; Chaudhuri, S.K. Studies on purging plug behavior in various steel treatment ladles. In Proceeding of UNITECR ’03, Tokyo, Japan, 2003; Refractory Technology Association: Tokyo, Japan, 2004; pp. 472–476. [Google Scholar]
  4. Teja, V.; Sarkar, S. Wall Stresses in Dual Bottom Purged Steelmaking Ladles. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2018, 139, 335–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  5. Tan, F.; Jin, S.; He, Z.; Li, Y.-W. Structural optimization and design of purging plug for improving its service performance. J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 2022, 29, 628–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  6. Tan, F.; He, Z.; Jin, S.; Li, Y.; Li, B. Study on failure and refining effect of purging plugs with different slits. Refract. WorldForum 2021, 23, 54–58. [Google Scholar]
  7. Long, B.; Xu, G.; Buhr, A.; Jin, S.; Harmuth, H. Fracture Behavior and Microstructure of Refractory Materials for Steel Ladle Purging Plugs in the System Al2O3-MgO-CaO. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 9679–9685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  8. Liu, J.; Dong, Y.; Qiu, X.; Ma, H.; Li, T.; Liu, X.; Jia, Q. Strength and microstructure evolutions of calcium aluminate cement bonded alumina-spinel castables containing Cr2O3 in the presence of ZnO. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 2025, 22, e15048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  9. Huang, A.; Fu, L.; Gu, H.; Wu, B. Towards Slag-Resistant, Anti-Clogging and Chrome-Free Castable for Gas Purging. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 18674–18680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  10. Trummer, B.; Nilica, R. New Ceramics for Innovative Purging Plug. In Proceedings of UNITECR ’07, Dresden, Germany, 18–21 September 2007; German Refractories Association: Dresden, Germany, 2007; pp. 18–21. [Google Scholar]
  11. Li, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, H. Thermal Shock Resistance and Slag Resistance of Castables for Purging Plugs, Chinese Society of Metals. In Proceedings of the 9th China Iron and Steel Conference, Beijing, Chian, 22–25 October 2013; Metallurgical Industry Press: Doncheng, China, 2013; pp. 1–6. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  12. Liu, Y.; Han, B.; Zhang, T.; Yu, H.; Yan, W.; Wei, Y.; Li, N. Effect of zirconia particle size on the properties of alumina-spinel castables. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 16961–16968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  13. Zhang, P.; Chen, A.; Ding, D.; Gao, S.; Liao, G. Trace nanoscale Al2O3 in Al2O3-MgAl2O4 castable for improved thermal shock performance. Ceram. Int. 2019, 49, 23029–23036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  14. Tang, H.; Li, C.; Gao, J.; Touzo, B.; Liu, C.; Yuan, W. Optimization of Properties for Alumina-Spinel Refractory Castables by CMA (CaO-MgO-Al2O3) Aggregates. Materials 2021, 14, 3050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  15. Chen, H.; Zhao, L.; He, X.; Fang, W.; Lei, Z.X.; Chen, H. The Fabrication of Porous Corundum Spheres with Core-Shell Structure for Corundum-Spinel Castables. Mater. Des. 2015, 85, 574–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  16. Liu, G.; Jin, X.; Qiu, W.; Ruan, G.; Li, Y. The Impact of Bonite Aggregate on the Properties of Lightweight Cement-Bonded Bonite–Alumina–Spinel Refractory Castables. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 4941–4951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  17. Yu, R.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, X.; Liu, P.; Qi, H.; Wang, J.; Liu, X. Fracture Behavior and Thermal Shock Resistance of Alumina-Spinel Castables: Effect of Added Fused Zirconia–Alumina. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 20732–20741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  18. Liu, J.; Zhao, L.; Jia, G.; Wang, S.; Cui, J.; Guo, H.; Liu, X.; Zhang, S.; Jia, Q. Preparation of Resin Coated Alumina Aggregate and Its Effect on the Properties of Alumina-Spinel Castables for Purging Plugs. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 35398–35405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  19. Qu, J.; Ding, D.; Xiao, G.; Lei, C.; Chen, J.; Luo, J.; Zang, Y. Preparation of CaCO3 Coated Corundum Aggregates by Dip-Coating and Heat Treatment and Its Effects on the Properties and Microstructures of Al2O3–MgO Castables. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 5174–5186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  20. Chen, H.N.; Shi, X.F.; Chen, J.; Sang, M.Y.; Ma, H.X.; Liu, X.H.; Jia, Q.L. Effects of Alumina Bubble Addition on the Properties of Corundum–Spinel Castables Containing Cr2O3. Materials 2024, 17, 3139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  21. Iveson, S.M.; Litster, J.D.; Hapgood, K.; Ennis, B.J. Nucleation, growth and breakage phenomena in agitated wet granulation processes: A review. Powder Technol. 2001, 117, 3–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  22. Ren, P.; Ling, T.C.; Mo, K.H. Recent advances in artificial aggregate production. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 291, 125215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  23. Yang, M.; Guo, Z.; Yang, Y.; Fan, J.; Ma, Q.; Guo, F.; Yu, X.; Liu, Y.; Zheng, X.; Sun, Z.; et al. Enhanced slag corrosion resistance of high-alumina castable with tailored spherical aggregates prepared by coal gangue and aluminum dross. Ceram. Int. 2026, 52, 26443–26459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  24. Long, B.; Andreas, B.; Xu, G. Thermodynamic evaluation and properties of refractory materials for steel ladle purging plugs in the system in the System Al2O3-MgO-CaO. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 11930–11940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  25. Bai, J.Y.; Chen, J.F.; Hou, X.S.; Lu, S.-K.; Bai, F.; Yan, W.; Wei, Y.-W.; Zhang, S.-W.; Li, N.; Zhang, Y. Fabrication of lightweight Al2O3@MgAl2O4 spherical aggregates and its influence on corrosion resistance and thermomechanical properties. J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 2026, 33, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  26. GB/T 2999-2016; Refractory Materials—Determination of Bulk Density of Granular Materials. General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2016.
  27. GB/T 5072-2023; Refractory Products—Determination of Cold Compressive Strength. State Administration for Market Regulation/Standardization Administration of China: Beijing, China, 2023.
  28. GB/T 3001-2017; Refractory Products—Determination of Modulus of Rupture at Ambient Temperature. General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2017.
  29. GB/T 2997-2015; Test Method for Bulk Density, Apparent Porosity and True Porosity of Dense Shaped Refractory Products. General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of PRC/Standardization Administration of China: Beijing, China, 2015.
  30. GB/T 5988-2022; Refractory Products—Determination of Permanent Change in Dimensions on Heating. State Administration for Market Regulation/Standardization Administration of China: Beijing, China, 2022.
  31. GB/T 3000-2016; Dense Shaped Refractory Products—Determination of Permeability to Gases. General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2016.
  32. Chen, J.; Kou, M.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, G.; Hou, X.; Yan, W.; Li, N.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, Y. A novel approach to refractory lightweight: Fabrication and application of lightweight Al2O3-MgO-based spherical aggregates. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2025, 46, 117987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of procedure for preparing alumina spherical aggregates.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of procedure for preparing alumina spherical aggregates.
Materials 19 03761 g001
Figure 2. Effect of firing temperature on the properties of the samples: (a) AP, BD, (b) water absorption, and (c) residual mass ratio.
Figure 2. Effect of firing temperature on the properties of the samples: (a) AP, BD, (b) water absorption, and (c) residual mass ratio.
Materials 19 03761 g002
Figure 3. (a) XRD patterns of ASAs fired at different temperatures and (b) SEM image of an ASAs.
Figure 3. (a) XRD patterns of ASAs fired at different temperatures and (b) SEM image of an ASAs.
Materials 19 03761 g003
Figure 4. Effect of ASAs content on the physical properties of the castables: (a) AP, (b) BD, (c) CMOR, (d) CCS and (e) PLC.
Figure 4. Effect of ASAs content on the physical properties of the castables: (a) AP, (b) BD, (c) CMOR, (d) CCS and (e) PLC.
Materials 19 03761 g004
Figure 5. Comparison of (a) AP, (b) CMOR, and (c) PLC of samples with 4% ASAs after firing at 1600 °C.
Figure 5. Comparison of (a) AP, (b) CMOR, and (c) PLC of samples with 4% ASAs after firing at 1600 °C.
Materials 19 03761 g005
Figure 6. HMOR of samples with different particle size and content of ASAs.
Figure 6. HMOR of samples with different particle size and content of ASAs.
Materials 19 03761 g006
Figure 7. Comparison of (a) residual CMOR and (b) RSR of samples with different particle sizes and ASAs contents.
Figure 7. Comparison of (a) residual CMOR and (b) RSR of samples with different particle sizes and ASAs contents.
Materials 19 03761 g007
Figure 8. SEM photos of the samples containing 4% ASAs with particle size (a) 1–0.5 mm, (b) 0.5–0.2 mm, and (c) 0.2–0 mm.
Figure 8. SEM photos of the samples containing 4% ASAs with particle size (a) 1–0.5 mm, (b) 0.5–0.2 mm, and (c) 0.2–0 mm.
Materials 19 03761 g008
Figure 9. Laser microscope photo and schematic diagram of crack propagation in the samples after thermal shock (a,b) without ASAs [20]; (c,d) with 4% 1–0.5 mm ASAs.
Figure 9. Laser microscope photo and schematic diagram of crack propagation in the samples after thermal shock (a,b) without ASAs [20]; (c,d) with 4% 1–0.5 mm ASAs.
Materials 19 03761 g009
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fu, T.; Huang, Y.; Xiong, W.; Chen, H.; Chen, Q.; Ma, H.; Jia, Q. Thermal Shock Resistance Enhancement of Alumina-Based Castables by Incorporating Porous Alumina Spherical Aggregates. Materials 2026, 19, 3761. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19173761

AMA Style

Fu T, Huang Y, Xiong W, Chen H, Chen Q, Ma H, Jia Q. Thermal Shock Resistance Enhancement of Alumina-Based Castables by Incorporating Porous Alumina Spherical Aggregates. Materials. 2026; 19(17):3761. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19173761

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fu, Tong, Ying Huang, Wei Xiong, Haonan Chen, Qilong Chen, Haoxuan Ma, and Quanli Jia. 2026. "Thermal Shock Resistance Enhancement of Alumina-Based Castables by Incorporating Porous Alumina Spherical Aggregates" Materials 19, no. 17: 3761. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19173761

APA Style

Fu, T., Huang, Y., Xiong, W., Chen, H., Chen, Q., Ma, H., & Jia, Q. (2026). Thermal Shock Resistance Enhancement of Alumina-Based Castables by Incorporating Porous Alumina Spherical Aggregates. Materials, 19(17), 3761. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19173761

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop