Next Article in Journal
From Static Structures to Molecular Dynamics: Emerging Directions in X-Ray and Electron Materials Characterization
Previous Article in Journal
Complementary Employment of Shell DFT-1/2 and HSE06 for Defect State Calculations in InP
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Bond Stress Distribution at the Joint Between Rock Bolts and Grout Under Different Grouting Conditions

1
State Key Laboratory of Water Resource Protection and Utilization in Coal Mining, Beijing 102211, China
2
School of Energy and Mining Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
3
Zhongye Changtian International Engineering Co., Ltd., Changsha 410205, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2026, 19(17), 3578; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19173578 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 25 July 2026 / Revised: 20 August 2026 / Accepted: 21 August 2026 / Published: 23 August 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Construction and Building Materials)

Abstract

In rock reinforcement systems, bond stress at the joint between rock bolts and grout exerts a crucial influence on determining the bonding capacity of rock bolts. However, much less research has been conducted to study the joint bond stress (JBS) distribution with analytical deduction. Therefore, this paper adopted an analytical model to evaluate JBS distribution. The novelty of this paper is that the JBS distribution under different grouting conditions can be quantitatively studied. Based on variable controlling techniques, the influence of different parameters on JBS distribution state was studied. These studied parameters included joint strength, joint remaining strength and relative slide at joint remaining strength. Results showed that after rock bolts were loaded, the loading process can be basically divided into five different stages. Joint strength exerts a crucial influence on determining the JBS distribution state before the joint fully disconnected. After the joint started disconnecting, larger joint strength led to a slower propagation speed of the maximum JBS. When the remaining strength of the joint increased, after the whole joint deformed plastically, the disconnected length became longer, and frictional resistance in the disconnected section became larger. This led to an increase in the bonding capacity of rock bolts. Compared with joint strength and joint remaining strength, relative slide at joint remaining strength had a slightly smaller influence on JBS distribution. Before the joint disconnected, increasing relative slide at joint remaining strength was likely to improve the propagation speed of the maximum JBS. This study is valuable for further understanding the stress-transferring mechanism in rock reinforcement systems.
Keywords: ground controlling; rock anchors; bonding capacity; joint remaining strength ground controlling; rock anchors; bonding capacity; joint remaining strength

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, J.; Fang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, C.; Zhang, P. Bond Stress Distribution at the Joint Between Rock Bolts and Grout Under Different Grouting Conditions. Materials 2026, 19, 3578. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19173578

AMA Style

Chen J, Fang J, Zhang Y, Zhu C, Zhang P. Bond Stress Distribution at the Joint Between Rock Bolts and Grout Under Different Grouting Conditions. Materials. 2026; 19(17):3578. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19173578

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Jianhang, Jie Fang, Yong Zhang, Chenyang Zhu, and Pengyu Zhang. 2026. "Bond Stress Distribution at the Joint Between Rock Bolts and Grout Under Different Grouting Conditions" Materials 19, no. 17: 3578. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19173578

APA Style

Chen, J., Fang, J., Zhang, Y., Zhu, C., & Zhang, P. (2026). Bond Stress Distribution at the Joint Between Rock Bolts and Grout Under Different Grouting Conditions. Materials, 19(17), 3578. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19173578

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop