Next Article in Journal
Material Removal Modeling for Free-Form Rubber Materials
Next Article in Special Issue
The Effects of Biomass Combustion Ash and Lignin on the Properties of Cement Mortars and Their Environmental Impact
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Rotational Speed on Accuracy in Measuring MIRS of Aerospace Aluminum Alloy by Incremental Hole-Milling Method
Previous Article in Special Issue
Experimental Study on the Uplift Bearing Mechanism of New Pneumatic Pipe Piles
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study on Mechanical Properties and Curing Reaction Mechanism of Alkali-Activated-Slag Solidified Port Soft Soil with Different Activators

1
School of Transportation Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, China
2
Key Laboratory of Building Structural Retrofitting and Underground Space Engineering (Shandong Jianzhu University), Ministry of Education, Jinan 250101, China
3
Ural International Rail Transit College, Shandong Polytechnic, Jinan 250104, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2025, 18(7), 1583; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18071583
Submission received: 28 February 2025 / Revised: 25 March 2025 / Accepted: 27 March 2025 / Published: 31 March 2025

Abstract

:
The application of alkali-activated slag (AAS) cementing material to the curing of soft soil foundations has a good engineering application prospect and is economical and environmentally friendly. In this study, three different activators (Na2O·nSiO2, NaOH, Ca(OH)2) were used to alkali-activate slag powder to solidify and improve soft soil in inland port areas. In order to explore the mechanical properties and strength formation mechanism of AAS-solidified soil under different activators, mechanical properties, and microscopic tests were carried out. Firstly, with unconfined compressive strength as the evaluation index, an orthogonal test of three factors, such as the type of activator, the amount of activator, and the amount of slag powder, was designed. Then, the unconfined compressive strength, resilience modulus, shear strength, and compression modulus of AAS-solidified soil were tested with the three activators under optimal dosage. Finally, phase composition, SEM-EDS, TG-DTG, and FT-IR analyses were carried out with the three AAS-solidified soils. The results show the following: (1) The factors affecting the unconfined compressive strength of AAS-solidified soil are ordered as follows: the type of activator > the amount of activator > the amount of slag powder. In addition, the optimal factors were as follows: activator type: Na2O·nSiO2; amount of activator: 3%; and amount of slag powder: 20%. (2) In considering the macroscopic mechanical properties, the effect of the activator is Na2O·nSiO2 > NaOH > Ca(OH)2, and the Na2O·nSiO2 AAS-solidified soil has good early strength. (3) The hydration products of AAS are mainly C-A-S-H gel, N-A-S-H gel, and C-S-H gel, which increase the strength and cohesion of solidified soil. The results show that AAS-solidified soil with 0.7-modulus Na2O·nSiO2 as the activator has good engineering characteristics and can be used for curing soft soil foundations.

1. Introduction

The soft soil foundation in an inland port area has poor bearing capacity, high compressibility, and low shear strength. The soft soil foundation is prone to settlement deformation and other problems without treatment [1,2]. Alkali-activated slag (AAS) cementing material is an environmentally friendly cementing material produced with slag powder using an alkaline activator [3]. In recent years, more and more scholars have begun to pay attention to the development and properties of alkali-activated slag/steel slag cementing materials [4]. Some scholars have also studied the effects of adding modifiers such as latex and nano-silica [5,6,7] or high-temperature conditions [8] on the properties of AAS cementing materials, and some scholars have used AAS, fly ash, and coal gangue as solidified materials [9,10] for solidified soil [11,12,13]. Liu Lin et al. [14] prepared AASC fluid-solidified soil using alkali-activated slag cement instead of Portland cement to solidify sludge, and they studied the strength formation mechanism of solidified soil using SEM and EDS tests. Zhu Yue [15] used a geopolymer made of alkali-activated steel slag and cement instead of cement to produce mixing piles to reinforce the soft soil foundation. Yi Yaolin et al. [16] used three activators, NaOH, Na2SO4, and Na2CO3, to alkali-activate mineral powder + calcium carbide slag and compared its unconfined compressive strength. Liu Gang et al. [17] studied the compressive and flexural strength of an alkali-activated slag powder–fly ash geopolymer and analyzed the hydration process via XRD, SEM, EDS, and DTG. Yang Xiaoyun et al. [18] found through orthogonal tests that the influencing factors of geopolymer strength are, in order, slag content, alkali content, and the Na2O·nSiO2 modulus, and they clarified the strength development mechanism of a geopolymer through XRD, FTIR, and SEM-EDS tests.
After several rounds of tentative tests, it was found that some activators had a poor excitation effect on the selected slag powder, such as neutral salt Na2SO4, alkaline salt Na2CO3, NaHCO3, high-modulus Na2O·nSiO2, and weak acid CH3COOH. The OH in NaOH and Ca(OH)2 can effectively stimulate the activity of slag. The Na2O·nSiO2 with a suitable modulus adjusted by NaOH can not only provide OH but also introduce a silicon source so that more cementitious materials are produced after the activation of slag. Moreover, compared with other activators, the three activators have no irritating odor during the mixing process. Therefore, Na2O·nSiO2 with a suitable modulus, NaOH, and Ca(OH)2 were selected for the alkali excitation of slag powder to solidified soft soil in a port area. When preparing the sample, the slag powder and the soil were first fully mixed, and then the activator was dissolved in water to prepare a solution, which was then stirred for more than 3 min until the solution was transparent. The solution was added to the slag powder and the soil and mixed for more than 5 min to prepare the AAS-solidified soil. The optimal ratio of AAS-solidified soil was obtained by conducting an orthogonal test, and its mechanical properties and microscopic reaction mechanism under different activators were analyzed comprehensively.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Raw Material

The appearance and basic properties of the raw materials are shown in Table 1, Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4. The soil samples used in this study were taken from the main port area of Jinan Port. The particle distribution curve is shown in Figure 1. The content of the medium-fine-grain group (<0.075 mm) is 51.15%. In the coarse-grain group (2~60 mm), the content of sand (0.075~2 mm) is 36.92%, and the content of gravel (2~60 mm) is 11.93%. Since the mass of fine-grained soil particles is greater than 50% of the total mass, the soil samples taken according to the Standard for Soil Test Methods (JTG 3430-2020) [19] were fine-grained soil. The plasticity index IP is 12.14, where 10 < IP ≤ 17; the liquid limit is 30.61% < 50%; and the soil sample was named low-liquid-limit silty clay.
The metal oxide content of slag powder was analyzed using an X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (XRF, Rigaku ZSX Primus III+).
The Na2O·nSiO2 used in the test was Yourui-brand liquid Na2O·nSiO2, a colorless transparent liquid, slightly viscous; the NaOH and Ca(OH)2 used in the experiment were all analytically pure. The appearance and essential property indicators of the raw materials are shown in Table 1, Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4.

2.2. AAS Matching Design

2.2.1. Mixing of Sodium Silicate Modulus

The modulus (nSiO2/nNa2O) is an important parameter of Na2O·nSiO2. The modulus of Na2O·nSiO2 was prepared with analytically pure NaOH using the following formulas and equations.
n = m 0 m
In the formula, n is the amount of matter; m0 is the mass of the substance (g); and m is the molar mass of the matter (60 g/mol for SiO2 and 62 g/mol for Na2O).
M = n ( S i O 2 ) n ( N a 2 O )
In the formula, M is the Na2O·nSiO2 modulus, and n is the amount of matter.
The conversion equation between NaOH and Na2O is as follows:
N a 2 O S i O 2 + 2 N a O H N a 2 O S i O 2 + N a 2 O + H 2 O
Per 100 g of Yourui liquid Na2O·nSiO2, the equation is as follows:
m n = 10.96 M 0 M n 10.96
In the formula, mn is the mass (g) of NaOH that should be added when the modulus of Na2O·nSiO2 is n; M0 is the modulus of Youri liquid Na2O·nSiO2 = 3.3; and Mn is the required modulus n.
Specifically, when Na2O·nSiO2 with a modulus of n is needed, every 100 g of Youri liquid Na2O·nSiO2 with a modulus of 3.3 needs to be analyzed and purified with mn g of NaOH so that Na2O·nSiO2 with a modulus of n of (100 + mn) g can be obtained.

2.2.2. Optimum Modulus Test Scheme for Na2O·nSiO2

To explore the influence of the Na2O·nSiO2 modulus on AAS-solidified soil, the Na2O·nSiO2 modulus was optimized using an experimental design, as shown in Table 5. The original soil sample was mixed with slag powder and excitation material in an extrinsic manner, and cylinder specimens of h5 cm × Φ5 cm were prepared. Unconfined compressive strength tests were then carried out after curing for 7 days.

2.2.3. Orthogonal Test Design of AAS-Solidified Soil

The Na2O·nSiO2 with best modulus value, NaOH, and Ca(OH)2 were separately administered different dosages of slag powder to investigate the strength properties of different AAS-solidified soils. An orthogonal test design was carried out. A, B, and C were used to represent three influencing factors: the type of activator, the amount of activator, and the amount of slag powder. Three different levels were designed for each influencing factor, and the values of each level showed equal gradient changes. The specimens were prepared according to the ratios in Table 6, and the unconfined compressive strength at the curing ages of 7 d and 28 d was measured.

2.3. Test Method

The unconfined compressive strength test was carried out according to the Standard for Soil Test Methods (JTG 3430-2020) [19]. The resilient modulus test, rapid consolidation test, and rapid shear test were carried out on the AAS-solidified soil under the optimal ratio, and the soil’s mechanical properties under the three activators were obtained.
To analyze the effect of different stimulants and curing ages on the hydration product, the solidified soil was dried to constant weight, and X-ray diffraction (XRD) test was carried out with a scanning range of 5~80° and a scanning speed of 2°/min. Then, Jade 6.0 software was used for analysis. The SEM-EDS test was carried out on the AAS-solidified soil with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) and energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS), and the morphology and element content of the product was observed and measured. The infrared spectrum of AAS-solidified soil was measured using a Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FTIR, type: Thermo Fisher Scientific Nicolet S20, Waltham, MA, USA). The wave number range was 400~4000 cm−1, and the molecular structure and chemical bond of the hydration products were analyzed. A Thermal Gravimetric Analyzer (TG, model: Rigaku TG/DTA 8122) was used for thermogravimetric analysis. The test temperature was 30~800 °C, and the heating rate was 10 °C/min. The relationship between the mass loss of solidified soil and temperature was measured.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Optimum Modulus of Na2O·nSiO2

The unconfined compressive strength of the AAS-solidified soil was tested according to the values in Table 5, and the unconfined compressive strength of AAS-solidified port soft soil under different Na2O·nSiO2 modulus was obtained. As shown in Figure 2, when the modulus of Na2O·nSiO2 is 0.7, the unconfined compressive strength of the solidified soil is the highest, at 7.81 MPa, meaning that the best modulus of Na2O·nSiO2 is 0.7.

3.2. Analysis of Orthogonal Test Results

The orthogonal test results of the unconfined compression at 7 d and 28 d are shown in Table 7.
A range analysis was carried out on the test results in Table 7, and the relationship between the unconfined compressive strength of the AAS-solidified soil, and the three factors (activator type, activator content, and slag powder content) was explored, as shown in Table 8 and Figure 2.
As seen from Table 8 and Figure 3, the order of the factors affecting the unconfined compressive strength of AAS-solidified soil is activator type A > activator content B > slag powder content C. The changing trend of unconfined compressive strength at the curing ages of 7 d and 28 d is the same, but the unconfined compressive strength at 28 d is significantly higher than that at 7 d. The optimal factors are Na2O·nSiO2 as the activator, 3% as the activator content, and 20% as the slag powder. The type of activator has the most significant influence on AAS-solidified soil and is the main factor in improving strength. The unconfined compressive strength of the cured soil at 7 d is 1.15 and 1.73 times that of NaOH and Ca(OH)2, respectively, when the activator is Na2O·nSiO2, and at 28 d, it is 1.29 and 1.57 times that of NaOH and Ca(OH)2, respectively. That is, Na2O·nSiO2 has the best excitation effect, followed by NaOH and Ca(OH)2. When Na2O·nSiO2, NaOH, or Ca(OH)2 is used as the activator, the unconfined compressive strength of solidified soil at 28 d is 25%, 11%, or 38% higher, respectively, than that at 7 d. Based on the unconfined compressive strength of cured soil at 7 d and 28 d, Na2O·nSiO2 > NaOH > Ca(OH)2. The content of the activator is also an essential factor affecting the unconfined compressive strength of solidified soil. It can be seen from Figure 3 that the unconfined compressive strength of solidified soil is the best when the content of the activator is 3%, and the strength of solidified soil at 7 d is 48% and 38% higher than that when the content of the activator is 4% and 5%, respectively. It can be seen that a greater amount of activator does not mean that the unconfined compressive strength of solidified soil is higher. Finally, although slag powder is the primary curing agent, the main curing effect is the gelling material generated after the alkali excitation of slag powder. Hence, the content of slag powder is not the main factor for improving the strength of solidified soil. The unconfined compressive strength of the solidified soil with 20% slag powder increased by 38% compared with 10% with slag powder at 7 d, and the unconfined compressive strength at 28 d increased by 19%. Moreover, if the slag powder content is too high, the hydration speed will be too fast and more difficult to mix. At the same time, considering economic factors, the optimal content of 15% slag powder was selected.

3.3. Mechanical Properties of AAS-Solidified Soils

According to the orthogonal test results, the optimal settings involve stimulating 15% slag powder with 3% Na2O·nSiO2 (modulus of 0.7) with unconfined compressive strength as the evaluation index. In order to evaluate the mechanical properties of AAS-solidified soil under different activators, the unconfined compressive strength, resilience modulus, shear strength, and resilience modulus of the three kinds of activators were tested.

3.3.1. Unconfined Compressive Strength

The influence of different activator types on the unconfined compressive strength of AAS-solidified soil is shown in Figure 4. When Na2O·nSiO2, NaOH, or Ca(OH)2 was used as the activator, the unconfined compressive strength of the cured soil at 7 d was 11.00 MPa, 7.3 MPa, and 5.9 MPa, respectively. At 28 d, the compressive strength increased slightly and was 12.2 MPa, 9.1 MPa, and 7.6 MPa, respectively, meaning that it increased by 10.7%, 24.63%, and 28.94%, respectively, compared with that at 7 d. Moreover, the compressive strength at 90 d continued to increase, with strengths of 14.85 MPa, 12.17 MPa, and 12.73 MPa, respectively, indicating that the unconfined compressive strength had increased by 35.45%, 67.12%, and 115.25%, respectively, compared with that at 7 d. It can be seen that the type of activator has a significant effect on the unconfined compressive strength, and the exciting impact of Na2O·nSiO2 is the best. In addition, the low compressive strength growth rate of Na2O·nSiO2 under different curing ages indicates that the alkali excitation of Na2O·nSiO2 results in early strength formation.

3.3.2. Rebound Modulus

The relationship between the unit pressure and rebound deformation of the AAS-solidified soil under different activators is shown in Figure 5. Under the same unit pressure, the deformation amount is the largest when the activator is NaOH and the smallest when the activator is Na2O·nSiO2. The resilience modulus of AAS-solidified soil is inversely proportional to the deformation. In comparing the results of the resilience modulus (Figure 6), that of Na2O·nSiO2-solidified soil is the largest, and that of Na2O·nSiO2-solidified soil is 2 times that of NaOH AAS-solidified soil and 6.5 times that of Ca(OH)2 AAS-solidified soil.

3.3.3. Shear Strength

Figure 7 shows the shear strength values of the three AAS-solidified soils under different vertical pressures, and the cohesion and internal friction angles of the three AAS-solidified soils obtained from Figure 7 are shown in Table 9. It can be seen from the chart that under the same vertical pressure condition, AAS-solidified soil with Na2O·nSiO2 as the activator has the highest shear strength, followed by AAS-solidified soil with NaOH as the activator and AAS-solidified soil with Ca(OH)2 with the worst shear strength.

3.3.4. Compression Modulus

Rapid consolidation tests were carried out on three kinds of AAS-solidified soil, and e-lgp curves of AAS-solidified soil under different activators were obtained, as shown in Figure 8.
The compression modulus Es1-2, which was obtained when the pressure interval increased from Pi = 0.1 MPa to Pi+1 = 0.2 MPa, was selected to determine the compression characteristics of the solidified soil, and the compression modulus of the three AAS-solidified soils was obtained, as shown in Figure 8. It can be seen from Figure 9 that when the activator is Na2O·nSiO2, the compression modulus of AAS-solidified soil under the same load is significantly greater than that of AAS-solidified soil under the other two activators; that is, the vertical deformation of AAS-solidified soil under the same load is small.

3.3.5. Evaluation of Macroscopic Mechanical Properties of AAS-Solidified Soil

The macroscopic mechanical properties of AAS-solidified soil and port soft soil were compared separately, as shown in Figure 10. It can be seen from the figure that the three AAS-solidified soils have obvious advantages in improving the unconfined compressive strength of plain soil, especially the unconfined compressive strength of Na2O·nSiO2 AAS-solidified soil is higher. Regarding resilience modulus, Na2O·nSiO2 AAS-solidified soil increased by more than 50 times, NaOH AAS-solidified soil increased by more than 20 times, and Ca(OH)2 AAS-solidified soil increased by nearly 8 times compared with port soft soil. The compression modulus of the soil cured by AAS is also improved effectively. Compared with the soft soil in the port area, the Na2O·nSiO2 AAS-solidified soil is increased 4 times, and the NaOH and the Ca(OH)2 AAS-solidified soil are both increased 3 times. The internal friction angle and cohesion value of the three AAS-solidified soils are also higher than that of the port soft soils. In general, compared with three kinds of AAS-solidified soil, Na2O·nSiO2 AAS-solidified soil has the best compressive properties, shear properties, and deformation resistance.

3.4. Microscopic Analysis

3.4.1. Phase Composition Analysis

Three different AAS-solidified soils with curing ages of 7 d and 28 d were analyzed through XRD tests. Figure 11 shows the XRD patterns of the three AAS-solidified soils at different curing ages. The blue line at the bottom of the figure is the PDF card of quartz (SiO2), and the diffraction peak of SiO2 is removed. The diffraction patterns of the three AAS-solidified soils mainly showed three kinds of sharp crystal peaks: the characteristic peaks of Albite, Anorthite, and Calcium silicate. At the same time, a broad dispersion peak appeared at 25~35°.
It can be seen from Figure 11a that the steamed bun peak (amorphous peak) appears in the Na2O·nSiO2 AAS-solidified soil at 25~35° at the age of 7 d. C(N)-(A)-S-H is an amorphous gel, and its diffraction peak cannot be seen directly on the XRD pattern, but the mineral powder as a curing agent contains a large amount of CaO, SiO2, Al2O3, and the activator contains Na2O. The reaction between the two forms of calcium aluminosilicate hydrate (C-A-S-H) gel, sodium aluminosilicate hydrate (N-A-S-H) gel, and calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) gel. Therefore, in the three figures, the steamed bun peak at 25~35° is most likely C(N)-(A)-S-H. Whether it is the gel product mentioned above still needs to be determined by EDS, FTIR, and other analytical means. In addition, in Figure 11a, the characteristic peak of C-S-H did not appear obviously when the curing age was 28 d, which was due to the large amount of Al in the AAS system at the later stage of hydration, which replaced Si in C-S-H, Na in Na2O·nSiO2 replaced Ca, and generated more C(N)-A-S-H gels. In Figure 11b, when the activator is NaOH, the curing reaction and hydration products are similar to Na2O·nSiO2. In Figure 11c, when the activator is Ca(OH)2, there is only the distinctive peak of C(A)-S-H in the spectrum, and the characteristic peak of CaCO3 appears, so the hydration products when the activator is Ca(OH)2 are mainly C-(A)-S-H gel and CaCO3.

3.4.2. SEM-EDS Analysis

(1)
Micromorphology
Figure 12 shows the SEM images of the products of three AAS-solidified soils enlarged by 20,000 times. As can be seen from the figure, in the soil cured by AAS, the gels generated by the reaction are amorphous or fibrous. These gels form a dense network structure covering the surface of the soil particles and filling the pores, changing the pores from large connected pores to small isolated ones, reducing the porosity of the soil sample. In addition, the gel products are closely bonded to the soil particles, and the interface bonding state is good. Figure 12a1–a3 shows the product morphology of Na2O·nSiO2-solidified soil. It can be seen that there are flocculent structures wrapped in soil particles and some hydration products, such as flake, rod, or columnar crystals. The product morphology of NaOH AAS-solidified soil is shown in Figure 12b1,b2. The gel products with flake structures are filled in the soil particle gap, and some network structures are interwoven in the cracks. The hydration products of Ca(OH)2 are shown in Figure 12c1,c2. The products are polygonal sheets and contain some rod-like hydration products. However, from the image, the gel products do not completely wrap the edges of clay minerals, and there is a phenomenon of falling off.
(2)
Element content
Figure 13 shows the EDS hydration products of AAS-solidified soil corresponding to Figure 12. The elements are mainly O, Ca, Si, C, Mg, Al, Na, Fe, etc. In Figure 13, the two elements with the highest content are O and Ca, consistent with the XRF results of slag powder, confirming that the hydration products that enhance the strength of soil samples are AAS.
As shown in Figure 13, it can be seen that the regions of Na (blue), Ca (green), Si (red), and Al (pink) elements are highly overlapped, and the content of these elements is relatively high. The flaky and rod-shaped gel products co-located by the three elements are C(N)-A-S-H gel. Filling the gel in the gap can wrap the soil particles, greatly reducing the porosity and cementing the soil particles together well. Compared with Figure 13b,c, the Ca/Si value and Na/Si value of Figure 13a are higher, which means that more C(N)-A-S-H gels are generated. Therefore, the Na2O·nSiO2 AAS-solidified soil shows better macroscopic mechanical properties than NaOH and Ca(OH)2 AAS-solidified soil.

3.4.3. TG-DTG Analysis

Figure 14 shows the TG-DTG curves (thermogravimetric differential curves) of three AAS-solidified soils at a curing age of 7 d, recording the weight loss of AAS-solidified soils with a temperature of 30~800 °C. In the figure, the most obvious mass loss occurs between 30 °C and 150 °C, which is due to the loss of free water in the solidified soil and the adsorbed water in C-A-S-H gel, N-A-S-H gel, and C-S-H gel. The weight loss of AAS-solidified soil with Na2O·nSiO2 as the activator is significantly greater than that of the solidified soil with the other two activators. This means that when Na2O·nSiO2 is the activator, more C(N)-(A)-S-H gels are generated. The second noticeable mass loss occurs between 600 and 800 °C, which is the decomposition of carbonate. There is also an insignificant weight loss peak, occurring between 350 and 450 °C, which is the decomposition of Ca(OH)2, and it is more noticeable when the activator is Ca(OH)2, indicating that there is Ca(OH)2 that does not participate in the reaction.

3.4.4. FTIR Analysis

Figure 15 shows the infrared spectra of slag powder and AAS-solidified soil. The O–H bond expansion vibration peak of the hydroxyl group in slag powder and AAS-solidified soil is at 3440 cm−1, and the bending vibration peak of the O–H bond is at 1650 cm−1, indicating that water exists in both slag powder and solidified soil, which is consistent with the TG test results. An amount of 400–1300 cm−1 is the fingerprint region of the infrared spectrum, and the characteristics of the absorption peak are relatively strong. Upon magnification observation, the absorption peak of slag powder appears at 500 cm−1 and 956 cm−1. Additionally, 500 cm−1 is the bending vibration peak of the Al–O bond, and 956 cm−1 is the stretching vibration of Si–O. The absorption peaks of AAS-solidified soil appeared near 465 cm−1, 775 cm−1, 875 cm−1, 1020 cm−1 and 1420 cm−1. The absorption peaks at 465 cm−1, 775 cm−1, 1020 cm−1 are caused by the vibration of Al–O and Si–O, which proves that the hydration products of alkali-activated cementitious materials are C-A-S-H and N-A-S-H because they all contain tetrahedral [SiO4]4− and [AlO4]5−. An amount of 1420 cm−1 and 875 cm−1, corresponding to the asymmetric stretching vibration and bending vibration of the C–O bond, respectively, reflect the formation of silicate.
Compared with sodium silicate AAS-solidified soil, the high-pH environment of NaOH AAS-solidified soil can accelerate the absorption of CO2 and generate more carbonates (the peak intensity of C–O bonds increases), which significantly aggravates the degree of carbonization. The increase in O–H peak intensity indicates that the structure of solidified soil is loose and the porosity is higher, which leads to the lower strength and higher permeability of sodium hydroxide AAS-solidified soil. Therefore, an appropriate modulus of Na2O·nSiO2 can balance the alkalinity supply and silicon source, which is better than that of single-doped sodium hydroxide. In comparing the three kinds of AAS-solidified soil, Na2O·nSiO2 AAS-solidified soil has a high gel polymerization degree, a small carbonization risk, and the highest mechanical strength potential; NaOH AAS-solidified soil has a high early strength and weak long-term performance; and the micro- and macro-mechanical angles of calcium hydroxide are general.

3.4.5. AAS Reaction Mechanism

Slag is dominated by an amorphous glass structure. The hydration reaction of alkali-activated slag is a multi-stage dynamic evolution process, and its core lies in the depolymerization–reconstruction mechanism of aluminosilicate glass. The specific reaction mechanism can be divided into three stages:
(1)
Vitreous deconstruction stage
The OH in the alkaline environment attacks the bridge oxygen bond, destroys the Si–O-Si and Al–O-Al bonds, and leads to network depolymerization. [SiO4] and [AlO4] tetrahedrons in the slag undergo a hydrolysis reaction to release the active aluminosilicate monomers [SiO4]4− and [AlO4]5−.
(2)
Monomer polycondensation stage
The dissolved monomers [SiO4]4− and [AlO4]5− coordinate with Ca2+ to form a short-chain C-S-H gel.
(3)
Gel evolution stage
With the development of the reaction process, the system undergoes the following structural evolution: the aluminum–oxygen tetrahedron enters the silicon–oxygen chain (T-O-T, T = Si/Al) through isomorphism substitution, and the silicon–aluminum monomer forms a cross-linked structure through a polycondensation reaction to form a three-dimensional network structure C-A-S-H gel. Na2O·nSiO2 and Na+ in NaOH replace some calcium sites through ion exchange to form a C(N)-A-S-H composite gel, which further optimizes the structure and mechanical properties of the soil particles.

4. Conclusions

(1)
Orthogonal tests were carried out on three factors: the type of activator, the amount of activator, and the amount of slag powder in AAS-solidified soil. It was found that the main factor affecting the unconfined compressive strength of AAS-solidified soil was the type of activator, the secondary factor was the amount of activator, and the tertiary factor was the amount of slag powder. The optimal factors were as follows: Na2O·nSiO2 as the activator type, 3% for the activator amount, and 20% for the slag powder amount.
(2)
The unconfined compressive strength, resilience modulus, shear strength, and compression modulus of the three AAS-solidified soils were tested. It was concluded that the effects of the initiators can be ordered as follows: Na2O·nSiO2 > NaOH > Ca(OH)2. Here, the unconfined compressive strength of Na2O·nSiO2 AAS-solidified soil can reach 11 MPa after 7 days, and the early strength forms quickly. Regarding macroscopic mechanical properties, AAS-solidified soil can effectively improve the mechanical properties of plain soil, and AAS-solidified soil as a foundation has good engineering characteristics.
(3)
Through XRD, FTIR, and TG-DTG tests on AAS-solidified soil, it was concluded that the hydration products of AAS are mainly C-A-S-H gel, N-A-S-H gel, and C-S-H gel. The gel cementation of soil particles can enhance the strength and stability of soft soil foundations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and funding acquisition, W.H.; writing—original draft preparation, methodology, and experiments, H.Z. and K.L.; writing—review and editing and validation, Y.C. and Z.Z.; data curation, Y.X. and K.L.; investigation and resources, Y.H.; formal analysis, J.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (Grant No. ZR2021ME238) and Project of Shandong Province Higher Educational Science and Technology Program (Grant No. J18KA216).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Nomenclature

XRFX-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometer
XRDX-Ray Diffraction
SEMScanning Electron Microscopy
EDSEnergy Dispersive Spectrometer
FTIRFourier Transform Infrared Spectrometer
TGThermal Gravimetric Analyzer
dDay

References

  1. Zhong, W. Study on Settlement Deformation Control of Shallow Solidified Soft Soil Foundation Under Traffic Load; Changsha University of Science and Technology: Changsha, China, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  2. Li, Y. Study on Settlement Law of Gully High Fill Foundation in Collapsible Loess Area; Lanzhou Jiaotong University: Lanzhou, China, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  3. Provis, J.L.; Palomo, A.; Shi, C. Advances in understanding alkali-activated materials. Cem. Concr. Res. 2015, 78, 110–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sun, J.; Zhang, Z.; Zhuang, S.; He, W. Hydration properties and microstructure characteristics of alkali–activated steel slag. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 241, 118141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. El-Yamany, H.E.; El-Salamawy, M.A.; El-Assal, N.T. Microstructure and mechanical properties of alkali-activated slag mortar modified with latex. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 191, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, X.G.; Xu, J.S.; Jiang, D.B.; Lyu, Y.; He, C.C.; Zhang, C.; Fu, Q.Y. Effect of Internal Curing of SAP on Properties of Alkali-Activated Slag Cementitious Materials. Silic. Bull. 2021, 40, 3435–3441. [Google Scholar]
  7. Long, W.J.; Xiao, B.X.; Gu, Y.C.; Xing, F. Micro- and macro-scale characterization of nano-SiO2 reinforced alkali activated slag composites. Mater. Charact. 2017, 136, 111–121. [Google Scholar]
  8. Wang, W.C.; Wang, H.Y.; Lo, M.H. The engineering properties of alkali-activated slag pastes exposed to high temperatures. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 68, 409–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cao, W.W.; Lei, T.; Min, Z.H.; Xu, X.L.; D, P.P. Performance and Mechanism of Solid Alkali-Activated Slag/Fly Ash Grouting Material. Silic. Bull. 2021, 40, 4037–4043. [Google Scholar]
  10. Shen, W.; Zhou, M.; Ma, W.; Hu, J.; Cai, Z. Investigation on the application of steel slag–fly ash–phosphogypsum solidified material as road base material. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 164, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  11. Liu, Y.; Wang, J.Z.; Lu, N.W.; Wang, B.W. Mechanical Properties of Alkali-Activated Slag-Fly Ash Geopolymers. China-Foreign Highw. 2024, 44, 67–74. [Google Scholar]
  12. Urinskas, D.; Vaiiukynien, D.; Stelmokaitis, G.; Doroševas, V. Clayey Soil Strength Improvement by Using Alkali Activated Slag Reinforcing. Minerals 2020, 10, 1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yang, Y.; Hu, A.P.; Li, P.; Chai, Y.B.; Wang, Z.Y. Research on Composite Improvement of Loess with Alkali Activated Coal Gangue Powder and Mineral Powder. Highway 2024, 69, 334–338. [Google Scholar]
  14. Liu, L.; Chen, S.; Chen, F.; He, L.; Shen, S. Analysis of strength characteristics and microstructure of alkali-activated slag cement fluidized solidified soil. Mater. Res. Express 2024, 11, 085502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhu, Y. Research on Mechanical Mechanism of Soft Soil Foundation Reinforced by Geopolymer Mixing Pile; Chang’an University: Xi’an, China, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  16. Yi, Y.L.; Li, C.; Sun, C.; Zhang, Z.F.; Liu, S.Y. Test on Alkali-activated Ground Granulated Blast-furnace Slag (GGBS) for Lianyungang Soft Soil Stabilization. J. Rock Mech. Eng. 2013, 32, 1820–1826. [Google Scholar]
  17. Liu, G.; Ding, M.W.; Liu, J.J.; WAN, H.W.; Xue, Y.J.; Jian, S.W. Hydration Behavior and Mechanical Properties of Alkaline Excited Slag-Fly Ash-Metakaolin Geopolymer. Silic. Bull. 2023, 42, 2106–2114. [Google Scholar]
  18. Yang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Lin, C. Compressive and Flexural Properties of Ultra-Fine Coal Gangue-Based Geopolymer Gels and Microscopic Mechanism Analysis. Gels 2022, 8, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. JTG 3430-2020; Test Methods of Soils for Highway Enginering. Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China, China Communications Press: Beijing, China, 2020.
Figure 1. Grain size distribution.
Figure 1. Grain size distribution.
Materials 18 01583 g001
Figure 2. Influence of Na2O·nSiO2 modulus on unconfined compressive strength of AAS-solidified soil.
Figure 2. Influence of Na2O·nSiO2 modulus on unconfined compressive strength of AAS-solidified soil.
Materials 18 01583 g002
Figure 3. Diagram of AAS-solidified soil’s unconfined compressive strength and three factors.
Figure 3. Diagram of AAS-solidified soil’s unconfined compressive strength and three factors.
Materials 18 01583 g003
Figure 4. Unconfined compressive strength of AAS-solidified soil with different activators.
Figure 4. Unconfined compressive strength of AAS-solidified soil with different activators.
Materials 18 01583 g004
Figure 5. Relation curve of unit pressure–rebound deformation.
Figure 5. Relation curve of unit pressure–rebound deformation.
Materials 18 01583 g005
Figure 6. Resilience modulus of AAS-solidified soil under different activators.
Figure 6. Resilience modulus of AAS-solidified soil under different activators.
Materials 18 01583 g006
Figure 7. Relation curve of vertical pressure–shear strength.
Figure 7. Relation curve of vertical pressure–shear strength.
Materials 18 01583 g007
Figure 8. e-lgp curves of three AAS-solidified soils.
Figure 8. e-lgp curves of three AAS-solidified soils.
Materials 18 01583 g008
Figure 9. Compression modulus values under different activators.
Figure 9. Compression modulus values under different activators.
Materials 18 01583 g009
Figure 10. Radar diagram of three AAS-solidified soils.
Figure 10. Radar diagram of three AAS-solidified soils.
Materials 18 01583 g010
Figure 11. XRD patterns of AAS-solidified soil with different activators. (a) Na2O·nSiO2 (b) NaOH (c) Ca(OH)2.
Figure 11. XRD patterns of AAS-solidified soil with different activators. (a) Na2O·nSiO2 (b) NaOH (c) Ca(OH)2.
Materials 18 01583 g011
Figure 12. Micromorphologies of different AAS-solidified soils ((a1a3): Na2O·nSiO2 as the activator; (b1,b2): NaOH as the activator; (c1,c2): Ca(OH)2 as the activator).
Figure 12. Micromorphologies of different AAS-solidified soils ((a1a3): Na2O·nSiO2 as the activator; (b1,b2): NaOH as the activator; (c1,c2): Ca(OH)2 as the activator).
Materials 18 01583 g012
Figure 13. EDS spectra of three AAS-solidified soils. (a) Elemental composition and energy spectrum when Na2O·nSiO2 is the activator. (b) Elemental composition and energy spectrum when NaOH is the activator. (c) Elemental composition and energy spectrum when Ca(OH)2 is the activator.
Figure 13. EDS spectra of three AAS-solidified soils. (a) Elemental composition and energy spectrum when Na2O·nSiO2 is the activator. (b) Elemental composition and energy spectrum when NaOH is the activator. (c) Elemental composition and energy spectrum when Ca(OH)2 is the activator.
Materials 18 01583 g013aMaterials 18 01583 g013b
Figure 14. TG-DTG curve of 7 d AAS-solidified soil.
Figure 14. TG-DTG curve of 7 d AAS-solidified soil.
Materials 18 01583 g014
Figure 15. Infrared spectra of slag and 28 d AAS-solidified soil.
Figure 15. Infrared spectra of slag and 28 d AAS-solidified soil.
Materials 18 01583 g015
Table 1. Appearances of the raw materials.
Table 1. Appearances of the raw materials.
Soil sampleSlag powder
Materials 18 01583 i001Materials 18 01583 i002
Na2O·nSiO2NaOHCa(OH)2
Materials 18 01583 i003Materials 18 01583 i004Materials 18 01583 i005
Table 2. Physical and mechanical properties of port soft soil.
Table 2. Physical and mechanical properties of port soft soil.
Natural Moisture Content/%Maximum Dry Density/g/cm3Best Moisture Content/%Liquid Limit/%Plastic Limit/%Plastic Index
27.051.7711.730.6118.4712.14
Table 3. Oxide content of slag powder.
Table 3. Oxide content of slag powder.
OxideCaOSiO2Al2O3MgOSO3TiO2Fe2O3MnOK2ONa2O
Content/%37.1726.6617.2912.183.421.510.580.370.310.29
Table 4. Basic properties of Na2O·nSiO2.
Table 4. Basic properties of Na2O·nSiO2.
Modulus (nSiO2/nNa2O)Solid Content/%SiO2/%Na2O/%Baume Degree/°BéPHBulk Density/t/m3
3.335.526.988.5338.510–131.35
Table 5. Na2O·nSiO2 modulus test design.
Table 5. Na2O·nSiO2 modulus test design.
Na2O·nSiO2 Modulus Activator Content/% Slag Powder Content/%
0.3/0.5/0.7/0.9/1.1415
Table 6. Orthogonal test design table of AAS-solidified soil.
Table 6. Orthogonal test design table of AAS-solidified soil.
No.Activator Type A Activator Content B/% Slag Powder Content C/%
1Na2O·nSiO25%20%
2Na2O·nSiO24%10%
3Na2O·nSiO23%15%
4NaOH5%10%
5NaOH4%15%
6NaOH3%20%
7Ca(OH)25%15%
8Ca(OH)24%20%
9Ca(OH)23%10%
Table 7. Orthogonal test results of AAS-solidified soil.
Table 7. Orthogonal test results of AAS-solidified soil.
Orthogonal Test Number 7 d Unconfined Compressive Strength 28 d Unconfined Compressive Strength
19.15910.958
25.8519.399
311.00412.188
46.3047.682
56.7646.643
69.53510.781
73.7536.025
85.3047.368
95.9137.272
Table 8. Range analysis table.
Table 8. Range analysis table.
Range7 d Unconfined Compressive Strength28 d Unconfined Compressive Strength
Activator Type A Activator Content B/% Slag Powder Content C/%Activator Type A Activator Content B/% Slag Powder Content C/%
K126.0126.4518.0732.5530.2424.35
K222.6017.9221.5225.1123.4124.86
K314.9719.2224.0020.6724.6729.11
k18.678.826.0210.8510.088.12
k27.535.977.178.377.808.29
k34.996.418.006.898.229.70
Superior levelA1B1C3A1B1C3
R3.682.841.983.962.281.58
Table 9. Shear strength index of AAS-solidified soil with different activators.
Table 9. Shear strength index of AAS-solidified soil with different activators.
Type of Solidified SoilCohesion
C (KPa)
Internal Friction Angle
φ (°)
Na2O·nSiO2 AAS-solidified soil67.4527.1
NaOH AAS-solidified soil56.1323.5
Ca(OH)2 AAS-solidified soil54.8823.0
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hu, W.; Zhang, H.; Cheng, Y.; Xue, Y.; Han, Y.; Jia, J.; Li, K.; Zhang, Z. Study on Mechanical Properties and Curing Reaction Mechanism of Alkali-Activated-Slag Solidified Port Soft Soil with Different Activators. Materials 2025, 18, 1583. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18071583

AMA Style

Hu W, Zhang H, Cheng Y, Xue Y, Han Y, Jia J, Li K, Zhang Z. Study on Mechanical Properties and Curing Reaction Mechanism of Alkali-Activated-Slag Solidified Port Soft Soil with Different Activators. Materials. 2025; 18(7):1583. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18071583

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hu, Wenjun, Han Zhang, Yu Cheng, Yi Xue, Yutong Han, Jianghua Jia, Kun Li, and Zhifeng Zhang. 2025. "Study on Mechanical Properties and Curing Reaction Mechanism of Alkali-Activated-Slag Solidified Port Soft Soil with Different Activators" Materials 18, no. 7: 1583. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18071583

APA Style

Hu, W., Zhang, H., Cheng, Y., Xue, Y., Han, Y., Jia, J., Li, K., & Zhang, Z. (2025). Study on Mechanical Properties and Curing Reaction Mechanism of Alkali-Activated-Slag Solidified Port Soft Soil with Different Activators. Materials, 18(7), 1583. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18071583

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop