Next Article in Journal
Prediction and Experimental Study of Low-Frequency Acoustic and Vibration Responses for an Aircraft Instrument Compartment Based on the Virtual Material Method
Previous Article in Journal
Microstructural Evolution and Mechanical Performance of A500 Bulletproof Steel Joints Welded with Austenitic and Ferritic Filler Materials
Previous Article in Special Issue
Efficient Photoelectrochemical Reduction of CO2 in Seawater with Cheap and Abundant Cu2O/Al2O3/TiO2 Electrode
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Theoretical Investigation of Single-Atom Catalysts for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction Based on Two-Dimensional Tetragonal V2C2 and V3C3

1
School of Physical Science and Technology, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710129, China
2
MSEA International Institute for Materials Genome, Langfang 065500, China
3
Particle Cloud Biotechnology (Hangzhou) Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 310018, China
4
Science and Technology on Thermostructural Composite Materials Laboratory, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China
5
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710129, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2025, 18(5), 931; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18050931
Submission received: 28 January 2025 / Revised: 18 February 2025 / Accepted: 19 February 2025 / Published: 20 February 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Multicomponent Catalytic Materials)

Abstract

:
Developing stable and effective catalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) has been a long-standing pursuit. In this work, we propose a series of single-atom catalysts (SACs) by importing transition-metal atoms into the carbon and vanadium vacancies of tetragonal V2C2 and V3C3 slabs, where the transition-metal atoms refer to Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, and Cu. By means of first-principles computations, the possibility of applying these SACs in HER catalysis was investigated. All the SACs are conductive, which is favorable to charge transfer during HER. The Gibbs free energy change (ΔGH*) during hydrogen adsorption was adopted to assess their catalytic ability. For the V2C2-based SACs with V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Ni, and Cu located at the carbon vacancy, excellent HER catalytic performance was achieved, with a |ΔGH*| smaller than 0.2 eV. Among the V3C3-based SACs, apart from the SAC with Mn located at the carbon vacancy, all the SACs can act as outstanding HER catalysts. According to the ΔGH*, these excellent V2C2- and V3C3-based SACs are comparable to the best-known Pt-based HER catalysts. However, it should be noted that the V2C2 and V3C3 slabs have not been successfully synthesized in the laboratory, leading to a pure investigation without practical application in this work.

1. Introduction

Energy is an important issue related to the economically and environmentally sustainable development of the world [1,2]. The conventional sources of energy, such as coal, petroleum, and natural gas, are available in limited quantity and not renewable and environmentally friendly [3,4]. To alleviate the looming energy crises, there is a global drive to explore and develop renewable and clean alternatives to fossil fuels [5]. This pressing need has sparked significant scientific efforts aimed at developing sustainable energy technologies to satisfy the growing energy demands of society while reducing carbon emissions as well as environmental degradation. As a clean and sustainable energy carrier, hydrogen (H2) possesses high gravimetric energy density and emits only water as a byproduct when utilized in a fuel cell [6]. Hydrogen production driven by renewable energy sources has become a promising strategy for generating carbon-free fuel from sustainable energy at low cost.
Electrochemical water splitting on the cathode is an efficient approach for hydrogen production, where the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) plays a key role in producing H2 [7]. During the HER process, highly effective catalysts are required to reduce the energy barrier and boost H2 production. Among the various types of electrocatalysts, Pt-based catalysts have demonstrated exceptional electrocatalytic performance and have been acknowledged as the most effective HER catalysts [8,9]. However, the limitation in availability and the high cost of Pt obstruct large-scale implementation, which leads to the exploration of alternatives as substitutes for Pt-based catalysts [10,11,12]. Up to now, a variety of efficient catalysts based on abundant elements have been developed with the advancement of nanotechnology. Zhao et al. successfully synthesized a series of cobalt-doped Ni0.85Se chalcogenides (CoxNi0.85-xSe, x = 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4) as electrocatalysts for HER [13]. The results indicate that Co0.1Ni0.75Se displays the highest HER performance. When adopting graphene oxide (rGO) in this catalyst as the support, the supported Co0.1Ni0.75Se exhibits even better performance than unsupported Co0.1Ni0.75Se, which is determined by the decrease in the HER overpotential of Co0.1Ni0.75Se/rGO (103 mV) compared to Co0.1Ni0.75Se (153 mV) at a current density of 10 mA cm−2, and the lower Tafel slope (43 mV dec−1) and kinetic resistance (21.34 Ω) compared to Co0.1Ni0.75Se (47 mV dec−1, 30.23 Ω). Ito and coworkers reported that N, S co-doped nanoporous graphene possesses high HER catalytic ability at low operating potential, comparable to two-dimensional (2D) MoS2 [14]. Wang et al. reported a double-deck carbon-coated V8C7 network as an efficient HER electrocatalyst. The HER catalytic performances of the V8C7 network are comparable to those of Pt in all pH conditions, with an overpotential of 38, 77, and 47 mV at a current density of −10 mA cm−2 in 0.5 M H2SO4, 0.1 M phosphate buffer, and 1 M KOH, respectively [15]. The significant progress of non-Pt-based catalysts encourages researchers to explore more noble-metal-free catalytic materials for HER.
Since 2D materials possess special physical and chemical properties, such as a large specific surface area [16], excellent optical transparency [17], and good mechanical properties [18], their potential application in HER catalysis has been intensively studied for decades [19]. Among the various 2D materials, 2D transition-metal carbides (TMCs) have exhibited great potential as electrocatalysts for HER due to their outstanding characteristics, including their excellent structural stability, high electrical conductivity, and large active surface. A class of 2D TMCs known as MXenes show great potential to act as HER catalysts. Bai et al. introduced many applications of MXene-based HER electrocatalysts from theoretical and experimental perspectives [20]. According to their review, many MXene-based materials, such as O-terminated Ti3C2, nanoribbons of Ti3C2, transition-metal-promoted V2CO2, and Co-substituted Mo2CTx, are promising candidates for HER catalysts. In addition to MXenes, many other 2D TMCs have also been reported to possess HER catalytic ability. By performing first-principles calculations, Yu et al. found that NbC2, TaC2, and MoC2 possess excellent HER catalytic ability under the reaction controlled by the Volmer–Heyrovsky mechanism [21]. These studies show that 2D TMCs possess significant potential in catalyzing HER.
With the development of catalyst preparation methods, the rational design of potential catalysts for HER has become fascinating. Among the different types of catalysts, single-atom catalysts (SACs), with only isolated atoms dispersed on the support surface, have attracted considerable interest due to their maximum atom utilization efficiency and high selectivity [22,23,24]. The high dispersion of isolated atoms can greatly reduce the usage of metals, which can greatly lower the application cost of SACs. Importantly, SACs possess unique spatial and electronic structures, and the electronic structure can be adjusted via heteroatom doping, thus achieving a specific coordination environment of the isolated atoms [25]. The active sites in SACs typically consist of individual metal atoms and the coordinating atoms of the support material [26]. Up to now, many species of metal atoms (precious and transition metals) and different support materials have been adopted in SACs with great HER catalytic ability. For example, Qiu et al. reported that isolated nickel atoms anchored to nanoporous graphene exhibit excellent HER catalysis with a low overpotential of about 50 mV and a Tafel slope of 45 mV dec−1 in 0.5 M H2SO4, together with high cycling stability [27]. Zhang and coworkers developed an SAC by importing single Pt atoms into the Mo vacancies of Mo2TiC2Tx MXene, and this SAC shows excellent HER catalytic performance with low overpotentials of 30 and 77 mV at current densities of 10 and 100 mA cm−2, respectively [28]. Furthermore, this Mo2TiC2Tx-based SAC possesses a mass activity about 40 times greater than that of a Pt-on-carbon catalyst. Deng et al. demonstrated that the HER catalytic ability of the in-plane S atoms of 2D MoS2 can be enhanced by Pt atom doping [29]. In order to explore more suitable SACs for HER, it is essential to investigate novel combinations of different support materials and single atoms.
Using experimental methods, researchers can prepare SACs based on 2D materials with isolated transition-metal atoms dispersed on the surface of substrates [30,31]. On the other hand, there are many works that theoretically investigate SACs based on 2D materials [32,33,34]. Inspired by these theoretical studies, in this work, we rationally designed a series of SACs theoretically by embedding various transition-metal atoms in the C and V vacancies of the stable 2D tetragonal vanadium carbides V2C2 and V3C3 that were identified by previous structural prediction on V-C phases [35,36], where the transition-metal atoms refer to Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, and Cu. The thermally, dynamically, and mechanically stable V2C2 and V3C3 possess good electrical conductivity, which is favorable to electrocatalysis. In addition, different from most 2D materials, each sub-layer of V2C2 and V3C3 has the same coordination for the C/V atom in the xy plane, which may result in unique HER catalytic properties. After the construction of V2C2- and V3C3-based SACs, the HER catalytic performances of the proposed SACs at different adsorption sites were investigated theoretically.

2. Computational Details

All the calculations based on spin-polarized density functional theory (DFT) were carried out with the Vienna ab initio simulation package (VASP 5.4.4) [37,38]. The exchange correlation effect was treated using generalized gradient approximation (GGA) [39] in the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE) form [40]. The kinetic energy cut-off was set as 500 eV, and the convergence criteria for electron self-consistent loop and geometry optimization were set as 10−5 eV and 0.02 eV/Å, respectively. A vacuum space larger than 15 Å in the z direction was chosen to eliminate spurious interactions between adjacent images. The DFT-D3 scheme [41] was employed to capture the long-range van der Waals interaction between the slabs. The 4 × 4 supercells of the V2C2 and V3C3 slabs were used to design SACs, and a 4 × 4 × 1 Gamma-centered k-point mesh was utilized to sample the Brillouin zone. In addition, to inspect the thermal stability of the studied SACs, ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) simulations were conducted at 600 K with a time step of 2 fs for 10 ps. The AIMD calculations were performed using the Andersen thermostat [42] and NVT ensemble.
To evaluate the possibility of forming a single vacancy on the V2C2/V3C3 slab, the defect formation energy was calculated via the following equation:
E form ( V i ) = E perfect V i E perfect + n μ i
where E perfect V i and E perfect are the energies of the V2C2/V3C3 slab with and without isolated vacancies, respectively, μi is the chemical potential of type i atom, and n is the number of vacancies, which is 1 in this study.
The binding energy of transition-metal atoms (TM = Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, and Cu) embedded in the vacancies of the V2C2/V3C3 slab was determined as follows:
E bind = E TM + S E S E TM
where ETM+S, ES, and ETM represent the energies of the designed SACs, defective V2C2/V3C3 slabs, and a single transition-metal atom in its bulk phase, respectively. According to the defined criteria, more negative values of Ebind correspond to more stable structures.
It is widely accepted that HER occurs via a multi-step electrochemical process. Specifically, in acidic solutions, the mechanism of the HER process involves hydrogen adsorption (Volmer reaction) followed by hydrogen desorption (Heyrovsky reaction and/or Tafel reaction) [43]:
H+ + e +* → H* (Volmer)
H* + H+ + e → H2 + * (Heyrovsky)
H* + H* → H2 + * (Tafel)
where the asterisk refers to the adsorption sites on the surfaces of the catalysts. Both Volmer and Heyrovsky/Tafel reactions influence the HER activity, and the Volmer reaction is a dominant step for the overall HER process, which can be applied to assess the HER catalytic ability of the catalyst [44]. The change in Gibbs free energy for hydrogen adsorption (∆GH∗) during the Volmer step is an effective descriptor for measuring HER catalytic activity and can be obtained by the following expression:
Δ G H * = Δ E H + Δ E ZPE T Δ S H
In this expression, ΔEH is the hydrogen adsorption energy and is calculated using the following equation:
Δ E H = E ( catalyst + H ) E catalyst 1 2 E H 2
where Ecatalyst+H and Ecatalyst denote the energies of the SACs with and without an adsorbed hydrogen atom, respectively, and E H 2 is the energy of the hydrogen molecule. ΔEZPE is the zero-point energy (EZPE) difference, and the contributions from the substrate to EZPE are negligible. Hence, ΔEZPE is computed by
Δ E ZPE = E ZPE H 1 2 E ZPE H 2
where E ZPE H and E ZPE H 2 are the EZPE of the adsorbed hydrogen atom and H2 in the gas phase, respectively. T is the temperature (T = 298.15 K), and TΔSH is the vibrational entropy difference during hydrogen adsorption. It should be noted that the contributions from the substrate to entropy are insignificant. Thus, TΔSH can be approximated as the entropy difference between the adsorbed hydrogen atom and hydrogen in a gaseous state. At 298.15 K, the entropy of gaseous H2 is approximately 0.40 eV [45].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Structures, Stability, and Active Sites

Pristine 2D V2C2 and V3C3 are tetragonal structures, and they possess two and three sub-layers, respectively [36]. For each sub-layer of these two vanadium carbides, each C/V atom is four-fold coordinated with its neighboring V/C atoms in the xy plane. For (4 × 4)-V2C2, the vacancy formation energies (Eform) of C and V vacancies are 8.52 and 10.54 eV, respectively. Given that the surfaces of V3C3 are more likely to produce vacancy defects compared to the middle sub-layer, the Eform of the Csurf (surface C) and Vsurf (surface V) vacancies of (4 × 4)-V3C3 were calculated, and the corresponding Eform are 7.25 and 10.82 eV, respectively. It is evident that both V2C2 and V3C3 show greater potential to form carbon defects on the surface with relatively low Eform compared to vanadium defects. The binding energies (Ebind) of transition-metal atoms embedded in the vacancies are listed in Table 1 and Table 2 for (4 × 4)-V2C2 and (4 × 4)-V3C3, respectively. The Ebind of transition-metal atoms at the C vacancy of (4 × 4)-V2C2 range from 0.92 to 2.27 eV, while those at the V vacancy range from −5.02 to −1.14 eV. The Ebind at the vacancies of (4 × 4)-V3C3 exhibit a similar range to those of defective (4 × 4)-V2C2. The Cr atom imported into the carbon defects shows the biggest binding energies (2.27 and 2.90 eV for V2C2 and V3C3 supercells, respectively), while the Ti atom in the vanadium defects exhibits the smallest binding energies (−5.02 and −5.61 eV for V2C2 and V3C3 supercells, respectively). Although the vanadium defects have higher formation energies compared with the carbon defects, they exhibit negative binding energies for all the imported transition-metal atoms. Taking into account both formation energies and binding energies, both carbon and vanadium defects are considered to be replaced by transition-metal atoms in this study.
The lattice constants of (4 × 4)-V2C2 with C and V vacancies are 11.400 and 11.389 Å, respectively, slightly smaller than those of (4 × 4)-V2C2 (11.415 Å). Figure 1a,b present the configurations of the V2C2-based SACs, along with the considered adsorption sites for HER, and Figures S1 and S2 (Supplementary Materials) show the relaxed structures of the SACs. It can be seen that there are significant height differences between the substrate and transition-metal atoms located at the C vacancy (Figure S1). This is because the radii of transition-metal atoms are bigger than the radius of a carbon atom, and a C vacancy does not have enough space to accommodate a transition-metal atom. When transition-metal atoms are stabilized at the V vacancy, the encased transition-metal atoms and surface of defective (4 × 4)-V2C2 are almost at the same height (Figure S2). The SACs are labeled TM@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC and TM@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VV, as shown in Figures S1 and S2, respectively. For TM@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC and TM@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VV, the anchored transition-metal atoms are surrounded by five V atoms and five C atoms, respectively. In addition, the lattice constants of optimized TM@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC and TM@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VV are listed in Tables S1 and S2 (Supplementary Materials), respectively. The lattice constants of most TM@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC are bigger than those of pristine (4 × 4)-V2C2, while those of most TM@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VV are smaller than those of (4 × 4)-V2C2. The lattice constant changes are related to the sizes of the vacancies, the radii of imported transition-metal atoms, and the heights of imported atoms from the substrate. Larger vacancies, smaller radii of imported atoms, and higher anchoring heights are conducive to smaller lattice constants.
The lattice constants of (4 × 4)-V3C3 with Csurf and Vsurf vacancies are 11.508 and 11.493 Å, respectively, slightly smaller than those of pristine (4 × 4)-V3C3 (11.510 Å) and larger than those of defective (4 × 4)-V2C2. Figure 1c,d display the configurations of the V3C3-based SACs, along with the considered adsorption sites for HER, and Figures S3 and S4 (Supplementary Materials) show the relaxed structures of the SACs. The relative position between the imported transition-metal atoms and substrates is similar to the situation in the V2C2-based SACs. The V3C3-based SACs are labeled TM@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C and TM@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-V, as shown in Figures S3 and S4, respectively. The lattice constants of all the TM@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C are bigger than those of pristine (4 × 4)-V3C3 (Table S3 of the Supplementary Materials), while those of most TM@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-V are smaller than those of (4 × 4)-V3C3 (Table S4 of the Supplementary Materials). Overall, the differences in lattice constants are less than 1%, indicating a good stiffness of the substrates.
The thermal stability of the studied SACs was evaluated by AIMD simulations at 600K with a time step of 2 fs. The AIMD results for the V2C2- and V3C3-based SACs are shown in Figures S5–S8 (Supplementary Materials). During the simulations, the energy profiles for each catalyst did not fluctuate violently. Furthermore, the studied systems did not undergo any degradation after the 10 ps AIMD simulations. These results demonstrate that all the designed SACs are thermally stable at high temperature.
The considered adsorption sites for HER are marked in Figure 1. For both the V2C2- and V3C3-based SACs, when transition-metal atoms (Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, and Cu) are anchored at the C/Csurf vacancy, the tops of the transition-metal atoms (site TM1), V atoms (sites V1, V2, and V3), and C atoms (sites C1, C2, C3, C4, and C5) are chosen as the adsorption sites for HER. For the SACs with transition-metal atoms (Ti, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, and Cu) embedded in the V/Vsurf vacancy, the nine adsorption sites are the tops of the transition-metal atoms (site TM1), C atoms (sites C1, C2, and C3), and V atoms (sites V1, V2, V3, V4, and V5).

3.2. Electronic Conductivity

Electronic conductivity is closely related to the efficiency of charge transfer during the catalytic process [46]. The densities of states (DOSs) of the defective V2C2/V3C3 supercells and constructed SACs are displayed in Figures S9–S12 (Supplementary Materials). As shown in Figures S9a and S10a, the V2C2 slab with a C/V vacancy exhibits good electronic conductivity, with the Fermi level falling into a continuum of energy states. Furthermore, all the TM@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC and TM@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VV also possess excellent conductivity (Figures S9b–i and S10b–h). According to the projected density of states (PDOS), the electronic conductivity of the V2C2-based SACs is dominated by V-d orbitals near the Fermi level. In addition, the DOSs of the defective (4 × 4)-V3C3 and V3C3-based SACs have similar characteristics to the DOSs of the V2C2-based structures (Figures S11 and S12). Overall, similar to other excellent HER catalysts, such as Mo2B2-, MoS2-, and MXene-based catalysts [32,47,48], all the designed SACs exhibit high electronic conductivity, which can ensure efficient charge transfer in HER.

3.3. Hydrogen Evolution Reaction Activity of V2C2-Based Catalysts

Generally, the HER process can be divided into three states, including the initial state H+ + e, the intermediate adsorbed H*, and the final H2 state. The Gibbs free energy difference between H* and H2GH*) is considered a key descriptor of the HER activity. In this work, the HER catalytic ability of 2D V2C2- and V3C3-based SACs at different adsorption sites is determined by ΔGH*. A smaller absolute value of ΔGH* means a better HER performance, and the optimal value of ΔGH* is zero. In general, catalysts with a | ΔGH*| smaller than 0.2 eV are regarded as excellent HER catalysts.
For TM@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC and TM@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VV, the calculation details for the free energy differences are listed in Tables S5–S19 (Supplementary Materials), including the energies (E), EZPE, vibrational entropy (TSH), Gibbs free energies (G), and ΔGH* of every V2C2-based SAC at different active sites. For each TM@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC, the EZPE value of the catalyst with the hydrogen atom adsorbed on the top of the imported transition-metal atom is smaller than that of its counterparts adsorbing H on the top of the C or V atoms. In addition, almost all the TSH values are less than 0.1 eV, much smaller than the EZPE values. Hence, compared with TSH, EZPE contributes more to the free energy.
The ΔGH* values of TM@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC at different adsorption sites are listed in Table 3. For each TM@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC, the ΔGH* at adsorption site C1 is not higher than that at sites on the top of other C atoms, and the ΔGH* at adsorption site V1 is smaller than that at sites on the top of other V atoms. Compared with other adsorption sites, C1 and V1 are closer to the imported transition-metal atoms, and the great impact of the transition-metal atoms on hydrogen adsorption leads to the relatively small ΔGH* values. Apart from (Ti and Co)@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC, other TM@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC exhibit high HER catalytic ability, with a |ΔGH*| smaller than 0.2 eV at some active sites. Specifically, there are up to eight adsorption sites that display great HER catalytic activity on the surface of Mn@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC, including C1, C2, C3, C4, C5, V2, V3, and TM1. In particular, the ΔGH* of Mn@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC at site C2 is zero, suggesting the best catalytic performance. (Fe, Ni and Cu)@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC have two active sites (V1 and TM1) with a |ΔGH*| smaller than 0.2 eV, and (V and Cr)@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC have only one active site (TM1) possessing excellent catalytic capacity. Among all the V2C2-based SACs, (Cr, Mn, Fe, and Cu)@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC possess active sites with a smaller |ΔGH*| compared to Pt (0.09 eV) [49]. In addition, for each TM@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC, the |ΔGH*| value of some sites is lower than that of Mo2B2 (0.37 eV) [32], and the |ΔGH*| value of all the sites is lower than that of MoS2 (2.0 eV) [50]. It should be noted that pristine tetragonal V2C2 is not suitable for HER catalysis [36], and the construction of SACs based on tetragonal V2C2 has enhanced its HER catalytic ability. Besides V2C2, the HER catalytic performance of Mo2B2, graphene, and MoS2 has also been greatly improved after importing transition-metal atoms [32,34,50], indicating the huge potential of SACs in HER catalysis.
Table 4 lists the ΔGH* values of TM@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VV at different adsorption sites. Similar to TM@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC, adsorption site C1 exhibits a relatively low ΔGH* among the sites on the top of the C atoms. Overall, the ΔGH* values of sites on the top of the C atoms are lower than those of sites on the top of the V atoms. For each TM@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VV, the free energy differences of all the considered adsorption sites are larger than 0.3 eV, suggesting inefficient HER catalytic performance.

3.4. Hydrogen Evolution Reaction Activity of V3C3-Based Catalysts

For TM@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C and TM@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-V, the calculation details for the free energy differences are listed in Tables S20–S34 (Supplementary Materials). It can be seen that the EZPE values of the SACs with hydrogen atoms adsorbed on the top of the C atoms (around 0.24 eV) are larger than those of the SACs adsorbing H on the top of the V atoms (0.17–0.19 eV) or imported transition-metal atoms (no more than 0.20 eV). In addition, the TSH values are smaller than 0.1 eV, indicating less influence on the free energy compared with EZPE.
The ΔGH* values of TM@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C at different adsorption sites are listed in Table 5. For each TM@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C, the ΔGH* values of the active sites on the top of the C atoms are lower than those of the V2 and V3 sites. In addition, adsorption sites V2 and V3 exhibit similar values of Gibbs free energy. Apart from Mn@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C, other TM@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C possess active sites with a |ΔGH*| smaller than 0.2 eV, suggesting their great HER catalytic ability. Specifically, (Ti and Co)@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C display excellent catalytic performance at sites C1, C2, C3, C4, C5, and TM1. Ni@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C also has six sites (C1, C3, C4, C5, V1, and TM1) exhibiting excellent catalytic performance. (V, Fe and Cu)@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C have more than two active sites with a |ΔGH*| smaller than 0.2 eV. Only Cr@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C has one adsorption site with great catalytic performance. These results indicate that most of the designed TM@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C have potential as promising HER catalysts.
The ΔGH* values of TM@(4 × 4)-V2C2-Vsurf-V suggest that they are all outstanding HER catalysts (Table 6). All the adsorption sites on the top of the C atoms exhibit a |ΔGH*| smaller than 0.2 eV for all the TM@(4 × 4)-V2C2-Vsurf-V except Co@(4 × 4)-V2C2-Vsurf-V. Co@(4 × 4)-V2C2-Vsurf-V shows excellent HER catalytic performance at sites C2 and C3. Different from the sites on the top of the C atoms, the sites on the top of the V atoms and anchored transition-metal atoms have values not less than 0.45 eV and display inefficient catalytic activity. On the whole, we can conclude that all the TM@(4 × 4)-V2C2-Vsurf-V can act as great HER catalysts.
Overall, V3C3-based SACs have better HER catalytic capacity than their V2C2-based counterparts. Based on the |ΔGH*| values, apart from Mn@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C, the HER catalytic abilities of other V3C3-based SACs are comparable to those of Pt- and Ru-based catalysts [51,52], suggesting the potential to replace precious-metal-based catalysts for HER. The |ΔGH*| value of every adsorption site is lower than that of MoS2 (2.0 eV) [50]. In addition, the minimum |ΔGH*| values of most V3C3-based SACs are comparable to the ΔGH* of Cr2TiC2O2 and Cr2VC2O2 MXenes [53]. Cr2TiC2O2 possesses excellent HER catalytic performance when hydrogen coverage is 1/4 (ΔGH* = −0.17 eV), 3/8 (ΔGH* = 0.16 eV), and 1/2 ML (ΔGH* = 0.20 eV), while Cr2VC2O2 exhibits great HER catalytic ability for 3/8 hydrogen coverage (ΔGH* = −0.03 eV). This indicates that transition-metal carbides have potential application value in HER catalysis.

4. Summary

In summary, we have constructed a battery of HER SACs by importing transition-metal atoms into the carbon and vanadium vacancies of 2D tetragonal V2C2 and V3C3. By means of first-principles computations, the feasibility of applying these SACs in HER catalysis was examined. The results indicated that all the SACs are thermally stable and conductive, which is favorable to catalysis. The Gibbs free energy change during hydrogen adsorption was used to evaluate their catalytic ability. Among the V2C2-based SACs, Mn@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC possesses eight adsorption sites with excellent HER catalytic ability, and (V, Cr, Fe, Ni and Cu)@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC also exhibit great HER catalytic performance at some active sites. These excellent V2C2-based SACs have a smaller |ΔGH*| at some sites than pristine V2C2, Mo2B2, and MoS2, indicating the great advantage of SACs. Among the V3C3-based SACs, apart from Mn@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C, all the SACs can act as outstanding HER catalysts. The minimum |ΔGH*| values of these outstanding V3C3-based SACs are comparable to the ΔGH* of Cr2TiC2O2 and Cr2VC2O2 MXenes. Overall, these great V2C2- and V3C3-based SACs can be compared with the best-known Pt-based HER catalysts. It should be noted that this is a pure theoretical study as the V2C2 and V3C3 slabs have not been successfully synthesized in the laboratory. This work offers researchers an incentive to synthesize these two materials. After successfully synthesizing these two materials, the stability of them in real electrochemical HER environments should be ensured before practical application.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ma18050931/s1. Figure S1: Top and side views of the optimized configurations of (a) Ti@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC, (b) V@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC, (c) Cr@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC, (d) Mn@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC, (e) Fe@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC, (f) Co@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC, (g) Ni@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC and (h) Cu@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC; Figure S2: Top and side views of the optimized configurations of (a) Ti@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VV, (b) Cr@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VV, (c) Mn@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VV, (d) Fe@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VV, (e) Co@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VV, (f) Ni@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VV and (g) Cu@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VV; Figure S3: Top and side views of the optimized configurations of (a) Ti@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C, (b) V@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C, (c) Cr@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C, (d) Mn@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C, (e) Fe@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C, (f) Co@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C, (g) Ni@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C and (h) Cu@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C; Figure S4: Top and side views of the optimized configurations of (a) Ti@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-V, (b) Cr@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-V, (c) Mn@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-V, (d) Fe@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-V, (e) Co@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-V, (f) Ni@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-V and (g) Cu@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-V; Figure S5: Energies as a function of time of (a) Ti@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC, (b) V@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC, (c) Cr@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC, (d) Mn@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC, (e) Fe@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC, (f) Co@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC, (g) Ni@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC and (h) Cu@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC. during the AIMD simulations (inset: the configurations after 10 ps AIMD simulations); Figure S6: Energies as a function of time of (a) Ti@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VV, (b) Cr@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VV, (c) Mn@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VV, (d) Fe@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VV, (e) Co@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VV, (f) Ni@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VV and (g) Cu@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VV. during the AIMD simulations (inset: the configurations after 10 ps AIMD simulations); Figure S7: Energies as a function of time of (a) Ti@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C, (b) V@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C, (c) Cr@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C, (d) Mn@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C, (e) Fe@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C, (f) Co@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C, (g) Ni@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C and (h) Cu@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C. during the AIMD simulations (inset: the configurations after 10 ps AIMD simulations); Figure S8: Energies as a function of time of (a) Ti@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-V, (b) Cr@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-V, (c) Mn@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-V, (d) Fe@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-V, (e) Co@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-V, (f) Ni@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-V and (g) Cu@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-V. during the AIMD simulations (inset: the configurations after 10 ps AIMD simulations); Figure S9: Total and partial density of states of (a) (4 × 4)-V2C2-VC, (b) Ti@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC, (c) V@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC, (d) Cr@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC, (e) Mn@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC, (f) Fe@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC, (g) Co@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC, (h) Ni@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC and (i) Cu@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC. The Fermi level is set to zero and marked with the dashed line; Figure S10: Total and partial density of states of (a) (4 × 4)-V2C2-VV, (b) Ti@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VV, (c) Cr@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VV, (d) Mn@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VV, (e) Fe@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VV, (f) Co@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VV, (g) Ni@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VV and (h) Cu@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VV. The Fermi level is set to zero and marked with the dashed line; Figure S11: Total and partial density of states of (a) (4 × 4)-V2C2-Vsurf-C, (b) Ti@(4 × 4)-V2C2-Vsurf-C, (c) V@(4 × 4)-V2C2-Vsurf-C, (d) Cr@(4 × 4)-V2C2-Vsurf-C, (e) Mn@(4 × 4)-V2C2-Vsurf-C, (f) Fe@(4 × 4)-V2C2-Vsurf-C, (g) Co@(4 × 4)-V2C2-Vsurf-C, (h) Ni@(4 × 4)-V2C2-Vsurf-C and (i) Cu@(4 × 4)-V2C2-Vsurf-C. The Fermi level is set to zero and marked with the dashed line; Figure S12: Total and partial density of states of (a) (4 × 4)-V2C2-Vsurf-V, (b) Ti@(4 × 4)-V2C2-Vsurf-V, (c) Cr@(4 × 4)-V2C2-Vsurf-V, (d) Mn@(4 × 4)-V2C2-Vsurf-V, (e) Fe@(4 × 4)-V2C2-Vsurf-V, (f) Co@(4 × 4)-V2C2-Vsurf-V, (g) Ni@(4 × 4)-V2C2-Vsurf-V and (h) Cu@(4 × 4)-V2C2-Vsurf-V. The Fermi level is set to zero and marked with the dashed line; Table S1: The lattice constants (Å) of TM@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC; Table S2: The lattice constants (Å) of TM@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VV; Table S3: The lattice constants (Å) of TM@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C; Table S4: The lattice constants (Å) of TM@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-V; Table S5: Calculated energies (E), zero-point energies (Ezpe), vibrational entropy (TSH), Gibbs free energies (G) and Gibbs free energy differences (ΔG) of Ti@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC at different adsorption sites; Table S6: Calculated energies (E), zero-point energies (Ezpe), vibrational entropy (TSH), Gibbs free energies (G) and Gibbs free energy differences (ΔG) of V@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC at different adsorption sites; Table S7: Calculated energies (E), zero-point energies (Ezpe), vibrational entropy (TSH), Gibbs free energies (G) and Gibbs free energy differences (ΔG) of Cr@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC at different adsorption sites; Table S8: Calculated energies (E), zero-point energies (Ezpe), vibrational entropy (TSH), Gibbs free energies (G) and Gibbs free energy differences (ΔG) of Mn@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC at different adsorption sites; Table S9: Calculated energies (E), zero-point energies (Ezpe), vibrational entropy (TSH), Gibbs free energies (G) and Gibbs free energy differences (ΔG) of Fe@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC at different adsorption sites; Table S10: Calculated energies (E), zero-point energies (Ezpe), vibrational entropy (TSH), Gibbs free energies (G) and Gibbs free energy differences (ΔG) of Co@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC at different adsorption sites; Table S11: Calculated energies (E), zero-point energies (Ezpe), vibrational entropy (TSH), Gibbs free energies (G) and Gibbs free energy differences (ΔG) of Ni@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC at different adsorption sites; Table S12: Calculated energies (E), zero-point energies (Ezpe), vibrational entropy (TSH), Gibbs free energies (G) and Gibbs free energy differences (ΔG) of Cu@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC at different adsorption sites; Table S13: Calculated energies (E), zero-point energies (Ezpe), vibrational entropy (TSH), Gibbs free energies (G) and Gibbs free energy differences (ΔG) of Ti@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VV at different adsorption sites; Table S14: Calculated energies (E), zero-point energies (Ezpe), vibrational entropy (TSH), Gibbs free energies (G) and Gibbs free energy differences (ΔG) of Cr@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VV at different adsorption sites; Table S15: Calculated energies (E), zero-point energies (Ezpe), vibrational entropy (TSH), Gibbs free energies (G) and Gibbs free energy differences (ΔG) of Mn@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VV at different adsorption sites; Table S16: Calculated energies (E), zero-point energies (Ezpe), vibrational entropy (TSH), Gibbs free energies (G) and Gibbs free energy differences (ΔG) of Fe@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VV at different adsorption sites; Table S17: Calculated energies (E), zero-point energies (Ezpe), vibrational entropy (TSH), Gibbs free energies (G) and Gibbs free energy differences (ΔG) of Co@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VV at different adsorption sites; Table S18: Calculated energies (E), zero-point energies (Ezpe), vibrational entropy (TSH), Gibbs free energies (G) and Gibbs free energy differences (ΔG) of Ni@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VV at different adsorption sites; Table S19: Calculated energies (E), zero-point energies (Ezpe), vibrational entropy (TSH), Gibbs free energies (G) and Gibbs free energy differences (ΔG) of Cu@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VV at different adsorption sites; Table S20: Calculated energies (E), zero-point energies (Ezpe), vibrational entropy (TSH), Gibbs free energies (G) and Gibbs free energy differences (ΔG) of Ti@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C at different adsorption sites; Table S21: Calculated energies (E), zero-point energies (Ezpe), vibrational entropy (TSH), Gibbs free energies (G) and Gibbs free energy differences (ΔG) of V@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C at different adsorption sites; Table S22: Calculated energies (E), zero-point energies (Ezpe), vibrational entropy (TSH), Gibbs free energies (G) and Gibbs free energy differences (ΔG) of Cr@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C at different adsorption sites; Table S23: Calculated energies (E), zero-point energies (Ezpe), vibrational entropy (TSH), Gibbs free energies (G) and Gibbs free energy differences (ΔG) of Mn@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C at different adsorption sites; Table S24: Calculated energies (E), zero-point energies (Ezpe), vibrational entropy (TSH), Gibbs free energies (G) and Gibbs free energy differences (ΔG) of Fe@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C at different adsorption sites; Table S25: Calculated energies (E), zero-point energies (Ezpe), vibrational entropy (TSH), Gibbs free energies (G) and Gibbs free energy differences (ΔG) of Co@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C at different adsorption sites; Table S26: Calculated energies (E), zero-point energies (Ezpe), vibrational entropy (TSH), Gibbs free energies (G) and Gibbs free energy differences (ΔG) of Ni@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C at different adsorption sites; Table S27: Calculated energies (E), zero-point energies (Ezpe), vibrational entropy (TSH), Gibbs free energies (G) and Gibbs free energy differences (ΔG) of Cu@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C at different adsorption sites; Table S28: Calculated energies (E), zero-point energies (Ezpe), vibrational entropy (TSH), Gibbs free energies (G) and Gibbs free energy differences (ΔG) of Ti@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-V at different adsorption sites; Table S29: Calculated energies (E), zero-point energies (Ezpe), vibrational entropy (TSH), Gibbs free energies (G) and Gibbs free energy differences (ΔG) of Cr@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-V at different adsorption sites; Table S30: Calculated energies (E), zero-point energies (Ezpe), vibrational entropy (TSH), Gibbs free energies (G) and Gibbs free energy differences (ΔG) of Mn@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-V at different adsorption sites; Table S31: Calculated energies (E), zero-point energies (Ezpe), vibrational entropy (TSH), Gibbs free energies (G) and Gibbs free energy differences (ΔG) of Fe@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-V at different adsorption sites; Table S32: Calculated energies (E), zero-point energies (Ezpe), vibrational entropy (TSH), Gibbs free energies (G) and Gibbs free energy differences (ΔG) of Co@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-V at different adsorption sites; Table S33: Calculated energies (E), zero-point energies (Ezpe), vibrational entropy (TSH), Gibbs free energies (G) and Gibbs free energy differences (ΔG) of Ni@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-V at different adsorption sites; Table S34: Calculated energies (E), zero-point energies (Ezpe), vibrational entropy (TSH), Gibbs free energies (G) and Gibbs free energy differences (ΔG) of Cu@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-V at different adsorption sites.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.X.; methodology, B.X. and S.Y.; software, Q.Z. and S.Y.; formal analysis, K.S.; resources, Q.Z. and K.S.; writing—original draft, B.X.; visualization, B.X.; supervision, K.S.; project administration, K.S.; funding acquisition, K.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51761135032), the MSEA International Institute for Materials Genome, and the high-performance computing center of Northwestern Polytechnical University.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors Qingfeng Zeng and Shuyin Yu were employed by the company Particle Cloud Biotechnology (Hangzhou) Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, Y.; Wang, R.; Shi, Y.; Wu, X. Can new energy become a breakthrough for economic development-based on clean development mechanism projects in less developed coastal cities. Sustainability 2024, 16, 8895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Omer, A.M. Energy, environment and sustainable development. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2008, 12, 2265–2300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, S.; Lu, A.; Zhong, C.J. Hydrogen production from water electrolysis: Role of catalysts. Nano Converg. 2021, 8, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhu, J.; Hu, L.; Zhao, P.; Lee, L.Y.S.; Wong, K.Y. Recent advances in electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution using nanoparticles. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 851–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gielen, D.; Boshell, F.; Saygin, D.; Bazilian, M.D.; Wagner, N.; Gorini, R. The role of renewable energy in the global energy transformation. Energy Strateg. Rev. 2019, 24, 38–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hassan, Q.; Algburi, S.; Sameen, A.Z.; Jaszczur, M.; Salman, H.M. Hydrogen as an energy carrier: Properties, storage methods, challenges, and future implications. Environ. Syst. Decis. 2024, 44, 327–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yao, R.; Sun, K.; Zhang, K.; Wu, Y.; Du, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Liu, G.; Chen, C.; Sun, Y.; Li, J. Stable hydrogen evolution reaction at high current densities via designing the Ni single atoms and Ru nanoparticles linked by carbon bridges. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 2218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nguyen, T.B.; Sherpa, K.; Chen, C.W.; Chen, L.; Dong, C.D. Breakthroughs and prospects in ruthenium-based electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction. J. Alloys Compd. 2023, 968, 172020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cheng, N.; Stambula, S.; Wang, D.; Banis, M.N.; Liu, J.; Riese, A.; Xiao, B.; Li, R.; Sham, T.K.; Liu, L.M.; et al. Platinum single-atom and cluster catalysis of the hydrogen evolution reaction. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, R.; Wang, H.; Luo, F.; Liao, S. Core-shell-structured low-platinum electrocatalysts for fuel cell applications. Electrochem. Energ. Rev. 2018, 1, 324–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liang, S.; Hu, H.; Liu, J.; Shen, H.; Li, Q.; Qiu, N.; Guo, H.; Guo, X.; Du, S.; Zhu, Y.; et al. Nickel-nitride composite: An eco-friendly and efficient alternative to platinum for electrocatalytic hydrogen production. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2023, 337, 123008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yuan, Y.; Wang, J.; Adimi, S.; Shen, H.; Thomas, T.; Ma, R.; Attfield, J.P.; Yang, M. Zirconium nitride catalysts surpass platinum for oxygen reduction. Nat. Mater. 2020, 19, 282–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhao, W.; Wang, S.; Feng, C.; Wu, H.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, J. Novel cobalt-doped Ni0.85Se chalcogenides (CoxNi0.85-xSe) as high active and stable electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction in electrolysis water splitting. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 40491–40499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ito, Y.; Cong, W.; Fujita, T.; Tang, Z.; Chen, M. High catalytic activity of nitrogen and sulfur Co-doped nanoporous graphene in the hydrogen evolution reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 2015, 54, 2131–2136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Xu, H.; Wan, J.; Zhang, H.; Fang, L.; Liu, L.; Huang, Z.; Li, J.; Gu, X.; Wang, Y. A new platinum-like efficient electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction at all pH: Single-crystal metallic interweaved V8C7 networks. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1800575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Siahrostami, S.; Tsai, C.; Karamad, M.; Koitz, R.; García-Melchor, M.; Bajdich, M.; Vojvodic, A.; Abild-Pedersen, F.; Nørskov, J.K.; Studt, F. Two-Dimensional materials as catalysts for energy conversion. Catal. Lett. 2016, 146, 1917–1921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Guo, Q.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, T.; Zhou, J.; Xiao, S.; Wang, S.; Feng, Y.P.; Qiu, C.W. Colossal in-plane optical anisotropy in a two-dimensional van der Waals crystal. Nat. Photon. 2024, 18, 1170–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jiang, H.; Zheng, L.; Liu, Z.; Wang, X. Two-dimensional materials: From mechanical properties to flexible mechanical sensors. InfoMat 2020, 2, 1077–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cho, Y.S.; Kang, J. Two-dimensional materials as catalysts, interfaces, and electrodes for an efficient hydrogen evolution reaction. Nanoscale 2024, 16, 3936–3950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bai, S.; Yang, M.; Jiang, J.; He, X.; Zou, J.; Xiong, Z.; Liao, G.; Liu, S. Recent advances of MXenes as electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction. npj 2D Mater. Appl. 2021, 5, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yu, Y.; Zhou, J.; Sun, Z. Novel 2D transition-metal carbides: Ultrahigh performance electrocatalysts for overall water splitting and oxygen reduction. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 2000570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, L.; Huang, L.; Liang, F.; Liu, S.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, H. Preparation, characterization and catalytic performance of single-atom catalysts. Chin. J. Catal. 2017, 38, 1528–1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pu, Z.; Amiinu, I.S.; Cheng, R.; Wang, P.; Zhang, C.; Mu, S.; Zhao, W.; Su, F.; Zhang, G.; Liao, S.; et al. Single-atom catalysts for electrochemical hydrogen evolution reaction: Recent advances and future perspectives. Nano-Micro Lett. 2020, 12, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Gao, W.; Liu, S.; Sun, G.; Zhang, C.; Pan, Y. Single-atom catalysts for hydrogen activation. Small 2023, 19, 2300956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, Z.; Yuan, X.; Guo, H.; Zhang, X.; Peng, J.; Pan, Y. Rational design principles of single-atom catalysts for hydrogen production and hydrogenation. Energy Environ. Sci. 2024, 17, 8019–8056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, J. Catalysis by supported single metal atoms. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 34–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Qiu, H.J.; Ito, Y.; Cong, W.; Tan, Y.; Liu, P.; Hirata, A.; Fujita, T.; Tang, Z.; Chen, M. Nanoporous graphene with single-atom nickel dopants: An efficient and stable catalyst for electrochemical hydrogen production. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 2015, 54, 14031–14035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, J.; Zhao, Y.; Guo, X.; Chen, C.; Dong, C.L.; Liu, R.S.; Han, C.P.; Li, Y.; Gogotsi, Y.; Wang, G. Single platinum atoms immobilized on an MXene as an efficient catalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction. Nat. Catal. 2018, 1, 985–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Deng, J.; Li, H.; Xiao, J.; Tu, Y.; Deng, D.; Yang, H.; Tian, H.; Li, J.; Ren, P.; Bao, X. Triggering the electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution activity of the inert two-dimensional MoS2 surface via single-atom metal doping. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 1594–1601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fei, H.; Dong, J.; Arellano-Jiménez, M.J.; Ye, G.; Kim, N.D.; Samuel, E.L.G.; Peng, Z.; Zhu, Z.; Qin, F.; Bao, J.; et al. Atomic cobalt on nitrogen-doped graphene for hydrogen generation. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, L.; Jia, Y.; Gao, G.; Yan, X.; Chen, N.; Chen, J.; Soo, M.T.; Wood, B.; Yang, D.; Du, A.; et al. Graphene defects trap atomic Ni species for hydrogen and oxygen evolution reactions. Chem 2018, 4, 285–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, T.; Zhang, B.; Peng, Q.; Zhou, J.; Sun, Z. Mo2B2 MBene-supported single-atom catalysts as bifunctional HER/OER and OER/ORR electrocatalysts. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ullah, F.; Ayub, K.; Mahmood, T. High performance SACs for HER process using late first-row transition metals anchored on graphyne support: A DFT insight. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 37814–37823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Fung, V.; Hu, G.; Wu, Z.; Jiang, D.E. Descriptors for hydrogen evolution on single atom catalysts in nitrogen-doped graphene. J. Phys. Chem. C 2020, 124, 19571–19578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wu, Y.Y.; Bo, T.; Zhang, J.; Lu, Z.; Wang, Z.; Li, Y.; Wang, B.T. Novel two-dimensional tetragonal vanadium carbides and nitrides as promising materials for Li-ion batteries. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019, 21, 19513–19520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Xue, B.; Xing, H.; Zhao, W.; Xie, J.; Zeng, Q.; Yu, S.; Su, K. Structural properties and hydrogen evolution reactions of predicted two-dimensional VnCn(n = 2, 3, 6) with first-principles calculations. Phys. Scr. 2023, 98, 115906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kresse, G.; Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 1996, 6, 15–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kresse, G.; Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 1996, 54, 11169–11186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Perdew, J.P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865–3868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Perdew, J.P.; Ernzerhof, M.; Burke, K. Rationale for mixing exact exchange with density functional approximations. J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 105, 9982–9985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Grimme, S.; Antony, J.; Ehrlich, S.; Krieg, H. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dis-persion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 132, 154104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Andersen, H.C. Molecular dynamics simulations at constant pressure and/or temperature. J. Chem. Phys. 1980, 72, 2384–2393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lasia, A. Mechanism and kinetics of the hydrogen evolution reaction. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 19484–19518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Liao, X.; Lu, R.; Xia, L.; Liu, Q.; Wang, H.; Zhao, K.; Wang, Z.; Zhao, Y. Density functional theory for electrocatalysis. Energy Environ. Mater. 2022, 5, 157–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Li, Q.; Lu, Y.; Luo, Q.; Yang, X.; Yang, Y.; Tan, J.; Dong, Z.; Dang, J.; Li, J.; Chen, Y.; et al. Thermodynamics and kinetics of hydriding and dehydriding reactions in Mg-based hydrogen storage materials. J. Magnes. Alloys 2021, 9, 1922–1941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Cheng, R.; Min, Y.; Li, H.; Fu, C. Electronic structure regulation in the design of low-cost efficient electrocatalysts: From theory to applications. Nano Energy 2023, 115, 108718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Liu, R.; Fei, H.L.; Ye, G.L. Recent advances in single metal atom-doped MoS2 as catalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction. Tungsten 2020, 2, 147–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Gao, G.; O’Mullane, A.P.; Du, A. 2D MXenes: A new family of promising catalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 494–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Nørskov, J.K.; Bligaard, T.; Logadottir, A.; Kitchin, J.R.; Chen, J.G.; Pandelov, S.; Stimming, U. Trends in the exchange current for hydrogen evolution. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2005, 152, J23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chen, X.; Sun, J.; Guan, J.; Ji, J.; Zhou, M.; Meng, L.; Chen, M.; Zhou, W.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, X. Enhanced hydrogen evolution reaction performance of MoS2 by dual metal atoms doping. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 23191–23200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jing, T.; Liang, D.; Hao, J.; Deng, M.; Cai, S. Single Pt atoms stabilized on Mo2TiC2O2 for hydrogen evolution: A first-principles investigation. J. Chem. Phys. 2019, 151, 024702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Wang, K.; Liu, X.; Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Hu, R.; Liu, B.; Zhang, P.; Xu, B.; Li, Y. Ru single atoms and nanoparticles immobilized on hierarchically porous carbon for robust dual-pH hydrogen evolution. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2025, 683, 324–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Cheng, Y.W.; Dai, J.H.; Zhang, Y.M.; Song, Y. Two-dimensional, ordered, double transition metal carbides (MXenes): A new family of promising catalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 28113–28122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The structures and adsorption sites of (a) TM@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC, (b) TM@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VV, (c) TM@(4 × 4)-V2C2-Vsurf-C, and (d) TM@(4 × 4)-V2C2-Vsurf-V. TM atoms are Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, and Cu for the C/Csurf vacancies, while they are Ti, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, and Cu for the V/Vsurf vacancies.
Figure 1. The structures and adsorption sites of (a) TM@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC, (b) TM@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VV, (c) TM@(4 × 4)-V2C2-Vsurf-C, and (d) TM@(4 × 4)-V2C2-Vsurf-V. TM atoms are Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, and Cu for the C/Csurf vacancies, while they are Ti, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, and Cu for the V/Vsurf vacancies.
Materials 18 00931 g001
Table 1. The binding energies Ebind (eV) of transition-metal-atom-substituted C or V monovacancies of (4 × 4)-V2C2.
Table 1. The binding energies Ebind (eV) of transition-metal-atom-substituted C or V monovacancies of (4 × 4)-V2C2.
TiVCrMnFeCoNiCu
C monovacancy1.622.222.272.121.511.581.110.92
V monovacancy−5.02 −3.81−3.34−2.84−2.49−2.14−1.14
Table 2. The binding energies Ebind (eV) of transition-metal-atom-substituted Csurf or Vsurf monovacancies of (4 × 4)-V3C3.
Table 2. The binding energies Ebind (eV) of transition-metal-atom-substituted Csurf or Vsurf monovacancies of (4 × 4)-V3C3.
TiVCrMnFeCoNiCu
Csurf monovacancy1.722.622.902.782.411.861.040.77
Vsurf monovacancy−5.61 −3.90−3.38−2.80−2.31−2.03−1.17
Table 3. Calculated Gibbs free energies at different adsorption sites for TM@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC. The units are in electron volts.
Table 3. Calculated Gibbs free energies at different adsorption sites for TM@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC. The units are in electron volts.
C1C2C3C4C5V1V2V3TM1
Ti@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC0.380.470.530.450.42−0.330.520.530.30
V@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC0.430.450.510.470.43−0.230.520.530.13
Cr@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC0.450.480.450.480.47−0.220.530.53−0.06
Mn@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC−0.130.000.02−0.04−0.05−0.780.070.06−0.04
Fe@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC0.400.490.490.450.43−0.140.540.530.04
Co@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC0.350.430.430.410.40−0.230.500.48−0.23
Ni@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC0.390.470.480.460.41−0.180.560.52−0.19
Cu@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VC0.350.510.490.420.42−0.040.530.510.19
Table 4. Calculated Gibbs free energies at different adsorption sites for TM@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VV. The units are in electron volts.
Table 4. Calculated Gibbs free energies at different adsorption sites for TM@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VV. The units are in electron volts.
C1C2C3V1V2V3V4V5TM1
Ti@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VV0.430.460.470.520.540.520.520.510.78
Cr@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VV0.460.460.470.510.500.520.500.510.31
Mn@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VV0.420.450.470.570.500.510.510.530.31
Fe@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VV0.380.460.510.590.500.530.500.540.35
Co@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VV0.330.510.550.670.540.580.560.600.47
Ni@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VV0.340.460.530.670.510.570.520.570.91
Cu@(4 × 4)-V2C2-VV0.440.470.510.630.500.620.520.561.48
Table 5. Calculated Gibbs free energies at different adsorption sites for TM@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C. The units are in electron volts.
Table 5. Calculated Gibbs free energies at different adsorption sites for TM@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C. The units are in electron volts.
C1C2C3C4C5V1V2V3TM1
Ti@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C−0.160.190.170.090.02−0.210.660.660.18
V@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C−0.360.130.170.090.03−0.210.660.660.05
Cr@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C−0.91−0.70−0.77−0.87−0.88−1.14−0.30−0.32−0.09
Mn@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C−1.23−1.04−1.10−1.18−1.20−1.46−0.62−0.63−1.07
Fe@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C−0.71−0.63−0.64−0.73−0.75−0.89−0.14−0.16−0.01
Co@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C−0.140.020.02−0.060.06−0.230.510.49−0.08
Ni@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C0.150.210.190.100.09−0.030.680.660.10
Cu@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-C0.230.280.210.120.110.040.680.660.41
Table 6. Calculated Gibbs free energies at different adsorption sites for TM@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-V. The units are in electron volts.
Table 6. Calculated Gibbs free energies at different adsorption sites for TM@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-V. The units are in electron volts.
C1C2C3V1V2V3V4V5TM1
Ti@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-V0.150.120.070.630.680.630.630.630.94
Cr@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-V−0.040.040.080.650.610.640.630.630.45
Mn@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-V−0.050.080.100.650.650.650.640.630.57
Fe@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-V−0.120.080.120.660.650.650.640.630.59
Co@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-V−0.250.030.080.640.610.660.610.630.60
Ni@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-V−0.180.080.130.660.650.670.640.620.98
Cu@(4 × 4)-V3C3-Vsurf-V−0.040.100.100.640.670.670.650.631.37
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xue, B.; Zeng, Q.; Yu, S.; Su, K. Theoretical Investigation of Single-Atom Catalysts for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction Based on Two-Dimensional Tetragonal V2C2 and V3C3. Materials 2025, 18, 931. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18050931

AMA Style

Xue B, Zeng Q, Yu S, Su K. Theoretical Investigation of Single-Atom Catalysts for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction Based on Two-Dimensional Tetragonal V2C2 and V3C3. Materials. 2025; 18(5):931. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18050931

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xue, Bo, Qingfeng Zeng, Shuyin Yu, and Kehe Su. 2025. "Theoretical Investigation of Single-Atom Catalysts for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction Based on Two-Dimensional Tetragonal V2C2 and V3C3" Materials 18, no. 5: 931. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18050931

APA Style

Xue, B., Zeng, Q., Yu, S., & Su, K. (2025). Theoretical Investigation of Single-Atom Catalysts for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction Based on Two-Dimensional Tetragonal V2C2 and V3C3. Materials, 18(5), 931. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18050931

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop