Next Article in Journal
Properties of Electrode Induction Melting Gas Atomization- and Vacuum Induction Melting Atomization-Produced Powders and Their As-HIPed Blanks
Next Article in Special Issue
Articulating Materials Are Determinants of Survivorship of Hip Arthroplasties Performed for Nontraumatic Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head
Previous Article in Journal
The Influence of Roughness on the Protective Layer Formation Induced by Marine Microorganisms on 5083 Aluminum Alloy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hydroxyapatite-Based Natural Biopolymer Composite for Tissue Regeneration
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluation of the Properties of Bioactive Mesoporous Glasses Doped with Cerium and Loaded with Polyphenols

1
Dipartimento di Chimica, Università degli Studi di Torino, 10125 Torino, Italy
2
Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche e Geologiche, Università degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia, 41125 Modena, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors equally contributed to this work.
Materials 2025, 18(3), 709; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18030709
Submission received: 4 January 2025 / Revised: 24 January 2025 / Accepted: 27 January 2025 / Published: 6 February 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Progress in Bioceramics and Their Composites)

Abstract

:
(1) Background: The onset of inflammation and oxidative stress after biomaterial implantation can lead to complications and prolonged recovery times. To address this, bioactive mesoporous glasses doped with cerium (0, 3.6 and 5.3 mol%) were loaded with three different biomolecules—3-hydroxyflavone, quercetin and morin hydrate—to enhance antioxidant properties while preserving bioactivity. (2) Methods: Elemental analysis, specific surface area determination, spectroscopic techniques, evaluation of antioxidant activity and in vitro bioactivity assessment were performed to characterize mesoporous glass loaded with biomolecules. (3) Results: Biomolecule loading gives values in the range of 0.5–2.0% and 10.3–39.6% for loading content and loading efficiency, respectively. The loading order is quercetin > morine hydrate > 3-hydroxyflavone, and a cerium percentage of 3.6 seems to be a good compromise. The antioxidant properties evaluated on both solids and solutions in contact with simulated biological fluids improve markedly over loaded glasses, and the most promising results are obtained with quercetin. In the most efficient systems, the bioactivity results were delayed and more evident at longer times (168 h) but were still retained. (4) Conclusions: We obtained new materials still bioactive with improved antioxidant properties that can be proposed for the regeneration of both hard and soft tissues.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Bioactive glasses (BGs) are widely utilized in medicine as bone fillers, scaffolds, and implant coatings due to their remarkable capacity to promote bone regeneration. Since the introduction of 45S5 Bioglass® [1], their applications have broadened significantly, paving the way for numerous biomedical innovations. The versatility of BGs lies in their ability to adapt across various forms, such as powders, coatings, 3D scaffolds, and fibers, and in the incorporation of therapeutic inorganic ions (TIIs), which enhance key properties including osteogenesis, angiogenesis, antibacterial activity, and cementogenesis [2]. The insertion of a biomaterial through surgery often results in the onset of local inflammation and is linked to the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), thus creating a condition of oxidative stress, which in turn increases inflammation, leading to further ROS generation [3,4]. The ability to convert ROS into non-hazardous species is therefore a desirable feature of a biomaterial in order to reduce post-implantation complications and the need for lengthy drug treatments and recovery times [5]. A suitable strategy to this end is adding antioxidant properties to biomaterial by doping with TIIs and loading with biomolecules and/or drugs [6,7]. BGs are particularly suited to this purpose due to their surface reactivity. Among TIIs, cerium, whose compounds are known for therapeutic applications, is of particular interest as an antioxidant [8,9], as it is able to inhibit ROS production and regulate their levels within the microenvironment, showing antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities [10,11,12,13]. Moreover, cerium-doped BGs (BGsCe) are produced by different synthetic methods, each of which corresponds to a specific category: melted quenched glasses (MQGs), sol–gel bioactive glasses (SGGs) and mesoporous bioactive glasses (MBGs). The reactivity of BGs depends on the method of synthesis; MBGs are more reactive due to their high pore volume and specific surface area (SSA) [9,14]. Furthermore, MBGs are effective drug delivery systems (DDSs), allowing for high loading efficiency combined with slow and controlled release kinetics [15,16,17,18]. Recently, we developed a range of BGsCe that differ in synthesis, composition, reactivity and in vitro properties [19,20,21]. We demonstrated that the addition of cerium does not significantly alter the bioactivity and the antibacterial properties of the biomaterial, while it has a positive effect on biocompatibility and improves antioxidant properties [9,11,13].
The use of natural polyphenols for health has increased considerably in recent years [11,22,23] due to their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, osteoinductive and anticancer properties. The activity of polyphenols does not depend solely on the concentration of these biomolecules in food; it also depends on their bioavailability following absorption, metabolization and tissue distribution. Unfortunately, the exposures required to achieve a therapeutic effect by polyphenols are often not achievable in vivo solely through diet. Loading a biomaterial with polyphenols is therefore a strategy to optimize a controlled release of these biomolecules, to increase their bioavailability and to achieve synergistic effects between the properties of the biomaterial and biomolecules [11,23,24,25].
In previous works [11,23], we reported a further improvement in the antioxidant properties of cerium-doped MBGs (MBGsCe) loaded with a mixture of polyphenols extracted from chestnuts (POLY) and also confirmed the ability of the loaded MBGs to retain bioactivity in a biological medium.
The aim of the present study is to evaluate other biomolecules in the same setting in order to identify hybrid materials with optimal antioxidant properties and controlled drug delivery behavior. We report therefore a multiparametric evaluation of MBGsCe loaded with three different biomolecules: 3-hydroxyflavone, quercetin and morin hydrate, whose structure is reported in Figure 1.
While not found in nature, 3-hydroxyflavone represents the basic backbone of flavonoids, and it is investigated for its various pharmacological properties [26], such as antiviral, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant. Furthermore, the strong electron conjugation of the aromatic systems also confers on 3-hydroxyflavone a fluorescent property, which makes it usable as an imaging agent for therapeutic purposes [26]. Distinctly from quercetin and morine, 3-hydroxyflavone does not present catechol groups, which are commonly found in natural polyphenols [27].
Quercetin is a flavonoid found in fruit and vegetables, and it has been indicated for treating various oral diseases, including oral cancer, periodontitis, caries, recurrent aphthous ulcers, endodontic root canal and dental restoration [28].
Morin hydrate is a bioflavonoid obtained mainly from the fruits, stems and leaves of plants in the Moraceae family, and it has been indicated for various life-threatening chronic and degenerative diseases [29].
In this study, we present the evaluation of the loading extent of these biomolecules on MBGsCe, which is followed by the study of their stability, antioxidant properties and bioactivity upon loading.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. MBGsCe Preparation and Biomolecules’ Loading

Three MBGsCe (Table 1) containing different cerium amounts (0, 3.6 and 5.3 mol%) were synthesized by a sol–gel EISA modified method, using TEOS, TEP, Ca(NO3)2 and Ce(NO3)3 as precursors, as reported in our previous papers [9,10,11,13,30] sieved to a 212–355 µm dimension and loaded with 1.0 mg/mL of the biomolecules’ loading solutions. Specifically, in the EISA method, we used the Pluronic P123 as a self-assembling polymer. The procedure is the following: first, 4.5 g of the surfactant Pluronic P123 (Sigma-Aldrich, Merck Life Science S.r.l. Milano, Italy, Mn~5800) was dissolved by magnetic stirring (~1 h) in 85 mL of ethanol (C2H5OH, Sigma-Aldrich, Merck Life Science S.r.l. Milano, Italy, ≥99.8) containing 1.2 mL of a 10% HCl (Sigma Aldrich, Merck Life Science S.r.l. Milano, Italy) solution; then, the appropriate amounts of TEOS (Sigma-Aldrich, Merck Life Science S.r.l. Milano, Italy, ≥99%), TEP (Sigma-Aldrich, Merck Life Science S.r.l. Milano, Italy, Italia, ≥99.8%), Ca(NO3)2·4H2O (Sigma-Aldrich, Merck Life Science S.r.l. Milano, Italy, ≥99%) and Ce(NO3)3·6H2O (Sigma-Aldrich, Merck Life Science S.r.l. Milano, Italy, 99%) were added under continuous stirring in 3 h intervals at room temperature.
The concentrations of the loading solutions derive from the optimal values reported in our previous manuscripts [11,23].
3-Hydroxyflavone, quercetin and morin are 98, 95 and 100% pure, respectively, and from Sigma Aldrich. FT-IR spectra and XRPD pattens of biomolecules are reported in Supplementary Materials Figures S1 and S2). Then, 1.0 mg/mL loading solutions were prepared by dissolving the biomolecules in ethanol for 2 h under magnetic stirring. The loading was carried out by soaking 0.1 g of each sample for 3 h at 37 °C in 5 mL of the biomolecules’ loading solution. All the samples were covered with aluminum foils to prevent exposure to light.
The name of the samples obtained and studied is indicated as “MBGsCepoly” with Ce = 0, 3.6, 5.3 mol% poly = F, Q, M for 3-hydroxyflavone, quercetin and morin, respectively. The use in figure captions of the term UL indicates that the samples are not loaded.

2.2. Surface Activation

The surface activation of each sample was carried out according to the literature [32,33,34] in order to free the hydroxyl groups on the surface and promote loading. First, 0.4 g of each sample was suspended in 5 mL of acetone and washed for 5 min in an ultrasonic bath; then, it was rinsed three times with 5 mL of double-distilled water, under sonication, and finally soaked in the loading solution.

2.3. Elemental Analysis (EA)

Elemental analysis (EA) was carried out with a FLASH 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) analyzer in order to quantify the amount of biomolecules in the loaded MBGs by measuring C (%). The results for each biomolecule will be expressed as loading content, LC (%) and loading efficiency LE (%) calculated as follows, where m = mass.
These data derive from three replicated experiments.
L C % = M M b i o m o l e c u l e m o l C i n t o b i o m o l e c u l e × M A C × C %
L E % = m b i o m o l e c u l e l o a d e d m b i o m o l e c u l e l o a d i n g s o l u t i o n × 100

2.4. Folin–Ciocalteu (FC) Method

A modified Folin–Ciocalteu (FC) method was applied to quantify the amount of loaded biomolecules via UV-Vis determination (JASCO V-570, Mettler Toledo, Columbus, OH, USA). First, 300 µL of biomolecules’ solution after loading was mixed with 900 µL of double-distilled water, 75 µL of Folin–Ciocalteu reagent (Sigma Aldrich) and 225 µL of Na2CO3 20% (w/v). A calibration curve for each biomolecule was also prepared. After 2 h, UV-Vis measurement was carried out (λ = 754 nm).
The results are expressed as LC (%) and LE (%), which were calculated as follows:
L E % = C i C f C i × 100
L C % * = L E % × C i × V i m M B G × 100
* Derived from LE (%). Where Ci = biomolecules’ loading solution concentration (mg/mL) before loading; Cf = biomolecules’ loading solution concentration (mg/mL) after loading; Vi = biomolecules’ loading solution volume (mL); m (MBG) = MBGs mass (mg).
Due to the nature of the biomolecule, it was not possible to perform this test on the MBGsCe loaded with 3-hydroxyflavone.

2.5. FT-IR Spectroscopy

FT-ATR (Attenuated Total Reflection) spectra of MBGsCe and MBGsCepoly were recorded with a VERTEX 70 spectrophotometer equipped with a Harrick MVP2 ATR cell and a DTGS detector (64 scans, 4 cm−1 resolution) (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany). FT-IR spectra were recorded with same instrument as for the FT-ATR ones: samples were prepared in the form of self-supporting pellets (ca. 10 mg cm−2) to obtain a sufficiently thin pellet to be inspected in transmission mode. However, this condition should have enough accuracy regarding all the spectral components that we need to characterize our materials, in particular in the region below 1400 cm−1.

2.6. Specific Surface Area (SSA) Determination

Specific surface area (SSA) was evaluated before and after loading in order to assess the possible textural changes arising from this process. SSA was determined by nitrogen adsorption porosimetry using a Chemisorb 2750 (Micromeritics SRL, Milano, Italy) and the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method [35].

2.7. Antioxidant Activity Assays

The antioxidant properties of MBGsCepoly were evaluated by two different methods described below. The first is named superoxide dismutase (SOD)-like activity [11,23,36] in analogy with the role of the SOD enzyme. The second is the 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) removal assay, which is a bioanalytical method used to measure radical scavenging activity (RSA) [37,38,39].

SOD-like Activity

SOD-like activity tests were performed using the SOD Determination Kit (Sigma Aldrich) adapted for a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (JASCO V-570, Mettler Toledo, Columbus, OH, USA). The test was performed on MBGsCepoly powders and on Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline, D8537 (DPBS) solution after 1, 4, 24, and 48 h of soaking with the powders (MBGsCepoly (mg)/DPBS (mL) = 75/50). The SOD-like activity is expressed as the rate of inhibition (I.R.%) of the formation of a water-soluble formazan dye formed upon the reduction of a tetrazolium salt (WST-1) by the superoxide anion, which was catalyzed by xanthine oxidase (XO) and inhibited by SOD. Values are reported as means ± standard deviation from three replicated experiments. A t-test was used to compare the means, and statistically significant differences were defined as those with a p-values less than 0.01.

2.8. RSA

The antioxidant capacity was evaluated using the DPPH test for a UV-Vis Spectrophotometer Cary3500 Compact UV-Vis (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA), monitoring the variation in absorbance at 524 nm. The test was performed after 1, 4, 24, and 48 h of DPBS soaking with the powders (MBGsCepoly (mg)/DPBS (mL) = ratio of 9.0/6.0). The test was performed in triplicate and the solutions were merged prior to the analysis. Then, 1.2 mL of DPPH ethanolic solution (5 × 10−5 M) was added to 1.2 mL of DPBS soaking solution, and the absorbance was monitored for 45 min, acquiring spectra every three minutes.
The following formula was used to calculate the percentage of RSA:
%   RSA = A 0 A 30 A 0 × 100
where A0 = absorbance at time zero; A30 = absorbance after 30 min.

2.9. In Vitro Bioactivity Assessment

MBGsCepoly were soaked in a simulated biological fluid (SBF) prepared as described by Kokubo [40,41] at 37 °C for 24, 72 and 168 h in order to verify the retention of bioactivity (formation of an apatitic layer constituted of hydroxyapatite, Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2, HA) by the loaded materials [40,41,42]. After soaking, FT-ATR spectra were collected on a Perkin Elmer 1600 spectrometer (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) in the range of 400–4000 cm−1, 180 scans to identify the characteristic bands of HA. Moreover, mineralogical evaluations (by X-ray Powder Diffraction, XRPD) were also carried out using an X’Pert PRO diffractometer (Malvern PANanalytical, Almelo, The Netherlands) (Cu Kα radiation, 5–70°, 2θ range) to detect the characteristic peaks of HA. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) with a JSM-6010LA microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with electron-dispersive spectroscopy, EDS, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) was used to evaluate morphological changes on the surface.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Loading Evaluation

EA and BET

LC (%) and LE (%) are reported in Table 2; these results indicate an efficient loading of the selected biomolecules on MBGsCe with values ranging from 0.5 to 2.0% and from 10.3 to 39.6% for LC and LE, respectively. The presence of cerium lowers these values without markedly compromising the extent of loading.
The loading effect was also assessed by measuring the specific surface area (SSA), as reported in Figure 2.
The unloaded MBGsCe possess high SSA (300–350 m2/g) consistently with their mesoporous structure and regardless of cerium content; loaded MBGsCe showed a significant decrease in SSA (160–200 m2/g), likely due to pore occlusion, which does not depend on the type of loaded molecules.

3.2. FT-IR

In the ATR spectra of samples, the characteristic bands of silica can be observed; in particular, the asymmetric stretching mode of O-Si-O units generates an intense band in the spectral range of 1300–900 cm−1 (Figure 3a). In the presence of cerium, there is a shoulder at 940 cm−1 that can be related to Si-O-Ce modes [43].
The spectra of MBGsCepoly samples are very similar, and no signal attributable to biomolecules is identifiable, probably for the low quantity loaded on each sample. Trying to improve the intensity of the signals, we recorded the FT-IR spectra of a pure self-supported pellet. For both unloaded and loaded MBG3.6 samples, see Figure 3b, it is possible to recognize the overtone of silica (2000–1800 cm−1), the bending mode of absorbed water molecules at 1630 cm−1 and a multiple band with maxima at 1450 and 1410 cm−1, which are, respectively, attributable to the formation of carbonate groups on the surface of the materials. Comparing the normalized spectra, there is an increase in the intensity of the former band due to the superimposition with the most intense modes of polyphenols molecules. At higher wavenumbers, the signal of isolated silanol surface groups at 3740 cm−1 is well recognizable, whose intensity decreases in MBGsCepoly, suggesting that polyphenols adsorption involved the formation of H bonding with these groups. Similar results were observed for higher cerium amounts.

3.3. Antioxidant Properties

The results of the SOD assay on the MBGsCepoly (Figure 4) indicate that loading with biomolecules causes a significant improvement in the SOD-like activity of the hybrid materials, especially with Q-loaded samples, that reach full I.R. at all cerium contents. Interestingly, the SOD-like activity of F-loaded samples decreases significantly at higher amounts of cerium: 80, 50 and 30 I.R. (%) for MBG0, MBG3.6 and MBG5.3, respectively. M-loaded samples show intermediate behavior with only the MBG5.3 sample showing a marked decrease with I.R. at 60%.
We then tested the SOD-like activity the solution after DPBS soaking (Figure 5).
All the eluates show a growing SOD-like activity up to 24 h; at 24 h, all samples have I.R. around 60–70% with the single exception of MBG0Q that show I.R > 90%. At 48 h, all samples show a marked decrease in SOD-like activity, except for unloaded MBG5.3, which presents a marked activity at longer times of release. This latter result suggests a limited radical scavenging activity linked to the dissolved cerium ions, as we observed in previous studies [11].
To further profile this behavior, we decided to investigate the antioxidant activity of the eluates by the DPPH test to measure their RSA [37,38,39]. In agreement with what was observed with the SOD assay, the results (Figure 6) indicate an improvement in the antioxidant activity with respect to unloaded MBGs, at least for MBG0 and MBG3.6, and increasing RSA at longer soaking times up to 24 h.
While in the SOD assay all loaded samples behaved in a roughly similar manner, the F-loaded samples present higher RSA than Q and M at all time points for MBG0 and MBG3.6 with a moderate decrease in RSA only a later time points. Albeit flavonoids with higher RSA values usually present a larger number of hydroxyl groups in their structures [44]; discrepancies between the results of different antioxidant assays are commonly observed [45,46]. Given the absence of catechol groups in F, the difference between the results in the two assays could be linked to a different affinity of the polyphenols with the molecular probes of the two assays, namely the small, charged superoxide anion and radical DPPH. The trend in RSA for MBGs5.3 is again comparable with that of the SOD-like assay with unloaded MBG5.3 showing a detectable antioxidant activity and a decrease in the RSA of the functionalized MBGs5.3 at longer time points. As observed for the SOD assay at 48 h, the RSA of all loaded samples with polyphenols decreases with the specific exception of MBG0F. The general decrease in RSA at longer time points again suggests a partial degradation of the polyphenols after prolonged time in solution.
Indeed, the quantification of the released F, M and Q in DPBS was complicated by the fact that the UV-Vis spectra of release solutions do not correspond to that of the starting molecule, confirming the partial degradation of the polyphenols in the tested solution.

3.4. In Vitro Bioactivity Assessment

From FT-IR measurements, the presence of the most important characteristic bands of HA is discussed, and the results are shown in Table 3. The results indicate that biomolecule loading delays but does not inhibit crystalline HA formation, which is in agreement with previous studies that indicated at least 168 h as the time required for HA [11,23] identification. The behavior of biomolecules is related to the presence of cerium, which is in agreement as widely discussed with increased structural cross-linking. Specifically, from a qualitative point of view, F best preserves the bioactivity for all MBGsCe studied (Figure S3).
XRPD patterns of MBGsCe loaded with Q, M were not reported, as the formed apatitic phase proved to be highly amorphous, making it poorly visible. Regarding the loading with F, with and without cerium, after 72 and 168 h in SBF (Figure 7a,b), some of the characteristic peaks of HA, at 26 and 32, 33 (°2θ), PDF [47] are recognized. The presence of a competitive phosphatic phase, CePO4 PDF [47], is also observed, with peaks at ~29 (°2θ); this is consistent with the reported mechanism in the literature, as it is a compound with a solubility product conducive to precipitation [11].
The presence of HA was also verified for the most representative sample, MBG3.6F, via SEM-EDS analyses. A micrograph (Figure 8) reveals the reacted surface (circled in gray), and it is possible to observe the formation of more clear aggregates of spherical shape. Moreover, a significant increase in the CaO and P2O5 oxides was observed when comparing the values obtained from the EDS analysis (Table 4).

4. Conclusions

The objective of this study was to assess the degree of loading of three biomolecules, 3-hydroxyflavone (F), quercetin (Q), and morin hydrate (M), onto MBGsCe, resulting in the evaluation of their stability, antioxidant properties and bioactivity upon loading.
The loading of the studied biomolecules was successful with values in the range of 0.5–2.0% and 10.3–39.6% for loading content and loading efficiency, respectively.
The presence of cerium can lower loading values, but a cerium concentration of 3.6 is a good compromise, and among the various biomolecules studied, the best loading order is as follows: MBG3.6Q > MBG3.6M > MBG3.6F
The SSA decreased generally from about 300 to 200 m2/g in accordance with partial pore occlusion, which, however, does not compromise the mesoporous structure of the studied glasses, and also cerium does not markedly affect the SSA values.
Antioxidant properties increase compared to unloaded glasses depend on the type of biomolecule and agree with the loading values trend. In all cases, after 24 h, antioxidant activity tends to be depleted.
Finally, the bioactivity is retained at longer times (168 h) for MBGsCe that have better antioxidant properties.
The combination of new antioxidant properties with persistent bioactivity allows us to state that these new materials may be proposed to propose new controlled biomolecules’ delivery systems for both hard and soft tissues regeneration.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ma18030709/s1, Figure S1: FT-IR spectra of F (a), Q (b), and M (c); Figure S2: XRPD patterns of F (a), Q (b), and M (c); Figure S3: FT-IR spectra of MBG3.6 and MBG5.3 loaded with F after 72 (blue-red) and 168 (orange–light blue) in SBF; Table S1: LC (%) and LE (%), calculated for MBGsCepoly with FC method.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization (A.Z., G.L. and G.C.), Methodology (C.C., F.F., A.G., G.L. and A.Z.), Validation (C.C., F.F., A.G., G.L. and A.Z.), Investigation (C.C., F.F., A.G., G.L., G.C. and A.Z.), Resources (G.C., A.Z. and G.L.), Data Curation (P.Z.), Writing—Original Draft (A.G., C.C., F.F., A.Z. and G.L.), Writing—Review and Editing Preparation (C.C., A.Z. and G.L.), Supervision (A.G., C.C., F.F., A.Z., G.C. and G.L.). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Zarwah Sohail, Sofia Antonioni, Monica Rigoletto, for helpful assistance in carrying out glass synthesis, enzymatic and antioxidant assays the development of the loading procedure.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hench, L.L. Bioceramics: From Concept to Clinic. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1991, 74, 1487–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hoppe, A.; Güldal, N.S.; Boccaccini, A.R. A review of the biological response to ionic dissolution products from bioactive glasses and glass-ceramics. Biomaterials 2011, 32, 2757–2774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Rosenfeldt, F.; Wilson, M.; Lee, G.; Kure, C.; Ou, R.; Braun, L.; de Haan, J. Oxidative Stress in Surgery in an Ageing Population: Pathophysiology and Therapy. Exp. Gerontol. 2013, 48, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kelly, F.J. Oxidative Stress: Its Role in Air Pollution and Adverse Health Effects. Occup. Environ. Med. 2003, 60, 612–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ferraris, S.; Corazzari, I.; Turci, F.; Cochis, A.; Rimondini, L.; Vernè, E. Antioxidant Activity of Silica-Based Bioactive Glasses. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 7, 2309–2316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Baino, F.; Hamzehlou, S.; Kargozar, S. Bioactive Glasses: Where Are We and Where Are We Going? J. Funct. Biomater. 2018, 9, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hoppe, A.; Mouriño, V.; Boccaccini, A.R. Therapeutic Inorganic Ions in Bioactive Glasses to Enhance Bone Formation and Beyond. Biomater. Sci. 2013, 1, 254–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Westhauser, F.; Rehder, F.; Decker, S.; Kunisch, E.; Moghaddam, A.; Zheng, K.; Boccaccini, A. Ionic Dissolution Products of Cerium-Doped Bioactive Glass Nanoparticles Promote Cellular Osteogenic Differentiation and Extracellular Matrix Formation of Human Bone Marrow Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells. Biomed. Mater. 2021, 16, 035028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zambon, A.; Malavasi, G.; Pallini, A.; Fraulini, F.; Lusvardi, G. Cerium Containing Bioactive Glasses: A Review. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 7, 4388–4401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nicolini, V.; Gambuzzi, E.; Malavasi, G.; Menabue, L.; Menziani, M.C.; Lusvardi, G.; Pedone, A.; Benedetti, F.; Luches, P.; D’Addato, S.; et al. Evidence of Catalase Mimetic Activity in Ce3+/Ce4+ Doped Bioactive Glasses. J. Phys. Chem. B 2015, 119, 4009–4019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lusvardi, G.; Fraulini, F.; D’Addato, S.; Zambon, A. Loading with Biomolecules Modulates the Antioxidant Activity of Cerium-Doped Bioactive Glasses. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2022, 8, 2890–2898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zheng, K.; Torre, E.; Bari, A.; Taccardi, N.; Cassinelli, C.; Morra, M.; Fiorilli, S.; Vitale-Brovarone, C.; Iviglia, G.; Boccaccini, A.R. Antioxidant Mesoporous Ce-Doped Bioactive Glass Nanoparticles with Anti-Inflammatory and pro-Osteogenic Activities. Mater. Today Bio 2020, 5, 100041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Nicolini, V.; Malavasi, G.; Lusvardi, G.; Zambon, A.; Benedetti, F.; Cerrato, G.; Valeri, S.; Luches, P. Mesoporous Bioactive Glasses Doped with Cerium: Investigation over Enzymatic-like Mimetic Activities and Bioactivity. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 20910–20920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Migneco, C.; Fiume, E.; Verné, E.; Baino, F. A Guided Walk through the World of Mesoporous Bioactive Glasses (MBGs): Fundamentals, Processing, and Applications. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 2571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Baino, F.; Fiorilli, S.; Mortera, R.; Onida, B.; Saino, E.; Visai, L.; Verné, E.; Vitale-Brovarone, C. Mesoporous Bioactive Glass as a Multifunctional System for Bone Regeneration and Controlled Drug Release. J. Appl. Biomater. Funct. Mater. 2012, 10, 12–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Vallet-Regí, M. Ordered Mesoporous Materials in the Context of Drug Delivery Systems and Bone Tissue Engineering. Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 5934–5943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xia, W.; Chang, J. Well-Ordered Mesoporous Bioactive Glasses (MBG): A Promising Bioactive Drug Delivery System. J. Control. Release 2006, 110, 522–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hum, J.; Boccaccini, A.R. Bioactive Glasses as Carriers for Bioactive Molecules and Therapeutic Drugs: A Review. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2012, 23, 2317–2333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Leonelli, C.; Lusvardi, G.; Malavasi, G.; Menabue, L.; Tonelli, M. Synthesis and Characterization of Cerium-Doped Glasses and in Vitro Evaluation of Bioactivity. J. Non Cryst. Solids 2003, 316, 198–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fraulini, F.; Raimondi, S.; Candeliere, F.; Ranieri, R.; Zambon, A.; Lusvardi, G. Ce-MBGs Loaded with Gentamicin: Characterization and in Vitro Evaluation. J. Funct. Biomater. 2023, 14, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Raimondi, S.; Zambon, A.; Ranieri, R.; Fraulini, F.; Amaretti, A.; Rossi, M.; Lusvardi, G. Investigation on the Antimicrobial Properties of Cerium-Doped Bioactive Glasses. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2022, 110, 504–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Torre, E.; Iviglia, G.; Cassinelli, C.; Morra, M. Potentials of Polyphenols in Bone-Implant Devices. In Polyphenols; Wong, J., Ed.; IntechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia, 2018; Chapter 4; ISBN 978-1-78923-425-1. [Google Scholar]
  23. Zambon, A.; Fraulini, F.; Raimondi, S.; Lusvardi, G. Dual Loaded Ce-MBGs with Bioactivity, Antioxidant and Antibacterial Properties. Ceram. Int. 2023, 49, 30875–30880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cazzola, M.; Vernè, E.; Cochis, A.; Sorrentino, R.; Azzimonti, B.; Prenesti, E.; Rimondini, L.; Ferraris, S. Bioactive Glasses Functionalized with Polyphenols: In Vitro Interactions with Healthy and Cancerous Osteoblast Cells. J. Mater. Sci. 2017, 52, 9211–9223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Riccucci, G.; Cazzola, M.; Ferraris, S.; Gobbo, V.A.; Miola, M.; Bosso, A.; Örlygsson, G.; Ng, C.H.; Verné, E.; Spriano, S. Surface Functionalization of Bioactive Glasses and Hydroxyapatite with Polyphenols from Organic Red Grape Pomace. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2022, 105, 1697–1710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Butun, B.; Topcu, G.; Ozturk, T. Recent Advances on 3-Hydroxyflavone Derivatives: Structures and Properties. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2017, 17, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Quideau, S.; Deffieux, D.; Douat-Casassus, C.; Pouységu, L. Plant Polyphenols: Chemical Properties, Biological Activities, and Synthesis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 586–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, Y.; Yao, J.; Han, C.; Yang, J.; Chaudhry, M.; Wang, S.; Liu, H.; Yin, Y. Quercetin, Inflammation and Immunity. Nutrients 2016, 8, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ali, S.; Wang, X.; Yan, H.-C. Morin Hydrate: A Comprehensive Review on Novel Natural Dietary Bioactive Compound with Versatile Biological and Pharmacological Potential. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021, 13, 111511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Varini, E.; Sánchez-Salcedo, S.; Malavasi, G.; Lusvardi, G.; Vallet-Regí, M.; Salinas, A.J. Cerium (III) and (IV) Containing Mesoporous Glasses/Alginate Beads for Bone Regeneration: Bioactivity, Biocompatibility and Reactive Oxygen Species Activity. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 105, 109971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lusvardi, G.; Fraulini, F.; Cavazzoli, C.; Zambon, A. Evaluation of the behaviour of hydrogels containing mesoporous glasses doped with cerium and loaded with polyphenols. Ceram. Int. 2024, 50, 33937–33945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Verné, E.; Vitale-Brovarone, C.; Bui, E.; Bianchi, C.L.; Boccaccini, A.R. Surface Functionalization of Bioactive Glasses. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2009, 90A, 981–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zhang, X.; Ferraris, S.; Prenesti, E.; Verné, E. Surface Functionalization of Bioactive Glasses with Natural Molecules of Biological Significance, Part I: Gallic Acid as Model Molecule. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013, 287, 329–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, X.; Ferraris, S.; Prenesti, E.; Verné, E. Surface Functionalization of Bioactive Glasses with Natural Molecules of Biological Significance, Part II: Grafting of Polyphenols Extracted from Grape Skin. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013, 287, 341–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Brunauer, S.; Emmett, P.H.; Teller, E. Adsorption of Gases in Multimolecular Layers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1938, 60, 309–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Karakoti, A.; Singh, S.; Dowding, J.M.; Seal, S.; Self, W.T. Redox-Active Radical Scavenging Nanomaterials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 4422–4432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gulcin, İ.; Alwasel, S.H. DPPH Radical Scavenging Assay. Processes 2023, 11, 2248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Xie, J.; Schaich, K.M. Re-Evaluation of the 2,2-Diphenyl-1-Picrylhydrazyl Free Radical (DPPH) Assay for Antioxidant Activity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 4251–4260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Foti, M.C. Use and Abuse of the DPPH• Radical. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 8765–8776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Maçon, A.L.B.; Kim, T.; Valliant, E.; Goetschius, K.; Brow, R.; Day, D.; Hoppe, A.; Boccaccini, A.; Kim, I.; Ohtsuki, C.; et al. A Unified in Vitro Evaluation for Apatite-Forming Ability of Bioactive Glasses and Their Variants. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2015, 26, 5403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kokubo, T.; Kushitani, H.; Sakka, S.; Kitsugi, T.; Yamamuro, T. Solutions Able to Reproduce in Vivo Surface-Structure Changes in Bioactive Glass-Ceramic A-W3. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1990, 24, 721–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kokubo, T.; Takadama, H. How Useful Is SBF in Predicting in Vivo Bone Bioactivity? Biomaterials 2006, 27, 2907–2915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Farag, M.M.; Al-Rashidy, Z.M. Synergistic Effect of Cerium and Structure Directing Agent on Drug Release Behavior and Kinetics. J. Solgel Sci. Technol. 2023, 105, 430–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chen, Z.Y.; Chan, P.T.; Ho, K.Y.; Fung, K.P.; Wang, J. Antioxidant Activity of Natural Flavonoids Is Governed by Number and Location of Their Aromatic Hydroxyl Groups. Chem. Phys. Lipids 1996, 79, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Caroli, C.; Baron, G.; Cappellucci, G.; Brighenti, V.; Della Vedova, L.; Fraulini, F.; Oliaro-Bosso, S.; Alessandrini, A.; Zambon, A.; Lusvardi, G.; et al. Extraction, Purification and in Vitro Assessment of the Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Policosanols from Non-Psychoactive Cannabis sativa L. Heliyon 2024, 10, e30291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Dudonné, S.; Vitrac, X.; Coutière, P.; Woillez, M.; Mérillon, J.-M. Comparative Study of Antioxidant Properties and Total Phenolic Content of 30 Plant Extracts of Industrial Interest Using DPPH, ABTS, FRAP, SOD, and ORAC Assays. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 1768–1774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gates-Rector, S.; Blanton, T. The Powder Diffraction File: A Quality Materials Characterization Database. Powder Diffr. 2019, 34, 352–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Chemical structure of 3-hydroxyflavone (F), quercetin (Q) and morin hydrate (M).
Figure 1. Chemical structure of 3-hydroxyflavone (F), quercetin (Q) and morin hydrate (M).
Materials 18 00709 g001
Figure 2. SSA (m2/g) of MBGsCe before and after biomolecules loading. Tests were performed in triplicate. Data are presented as averages with error bars representing the SD.
Figure 2. SSA (m2/g) of MBGsCe before and after biomolecules loading. Tests were performed in triplicate. Data are presented as averages with error bars representing the SD.
Materials 18 00709 g002
Figure 3. (a) ATR spectra of MBG0 (purple), MBG3.6 (red) and MBG5.3 (black); (b) FT-IR spectra of MBGs3.6: UL (pink), Q (blue), M (orange) and F (green).
Figure 3. (a) ATR spectra of MBG0 (purple), MBG3.6 (red) and MBG5.3 (black); (b) FT-IR spectra of MBGs3.6: UL (pink), Q (blue), M (orange) and F (green).
Materials 18 00709 g003
Figure 4. SOD-like activity of MBGsCepoly. Tests were performed in triplicate. Data are presented as averages with error bars representing the SD.
Figure 4. SOD-like activity of MBGsCepoly. Tests were performed in triplicate. Data are presented as averages with error bars representing the SD.
Materials 18 00709 g004
Figure 5. SOD-like activity of MBGsCepoly after DPBS soaking. Tests were performed in triplicate. Data are presented as averages with error bars representing the SD.
Figure 5. SOD-like activity of MBGsCepoly after DPBS soaking. Tests were performed in triplicate. Data are presented as averages with error bars representing the SD.
Materials 18 00709 g005
Figure 6. RSA values of MBGsCepoly after DPBS soaking. Tests were performed in triplicate. Data are presented as averages with error bars representing the SD.
Figure 6. RSA values of MBGsCepoly after DPBS soaking. Tests were performed in triplicate. Data are presented as averages with error bars representing the SD.
Materials 18 00709 g006
Figure 7. XRPD patterns of MBG0 (green), MBG3.6 (yellow) and MBG5.3 (blue) loaded with F after 72 (a) and 168 (b) h of SBF soaking. HA = Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2, Ce = CePO4.
Figure 7. XRPD patterns of MBG0 (green), MBG3.6 (yellow) and MBG5.3 (blue) loaded with F after 72 (a) and 168 (b) h of SBF soaking. HA = Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2, Ce = CePO4.
Materials 18 00709 g007
Figure 8. SEM micrograph of MBG3.6F after 168 h of SBF soaking.
Figure 8. SEM micrograph of MBG3.6F after 168 h of SBF soaking.
Materials 18 00709 g008
Table 1. Nominal composition (mol%) of the MBGsCe [31].
Table 1. Nominal composition (mol%) of the MBGsCe [31].
MBGsCeSiO2CaOP2O5CeO2
MBG080155-
MBG3.677.114.54.83.6
MBG5.375.814.24.75.3
Table 2. LC (%) and LE (%) of MBGsCepoly calculated by EA.
Table 2. LC (%) and LE (%) of MBGsCepoly calculated by EA.
MBGsCepolyLC (%)LE (%)
MBG0Q2.039.6
MBG3.6Q1.223.2
MBG5.3Q1.019.5
MBG0M1.121.7
MBG3.6M0.510.3
MBG5.3M0.611.7
MBG0F1.734.9
MBG3.6F1.020.1
MBG5.3F0.611.9
Similar results were obtained with the FC method and are shown in Supplementary Materials (Table S1).
Table 3. FT-IR characteristic bands of HA after 24 (gray), 72 (blue) and 168 (green) h.
Table 3. FT-IR characteristic bands of HA after 24 (gray), 72 (blue) and 168 (green) h.
MBGsCeWavenumber (cm−1)
605565605565605565
MBG0++++++++++++++
MBG3.6++++++++++++
MBG5.3++++++++++++
MBG0Q++++++
MBG3.6Q++
MBG5.3Q++
MBG0F++++++++++++++++++
MBG3.6F++++++++
MBG5.3F++++++++++
MBG0M++++++++++++++++++
MBG3.6M++
MBG5.3M++
(+ present, ++ intense, +++ very intense band, − absent).
Table 4. EDS oxides compositions (mol %) of MBGs3.6F before and after 168 h of SBF soaking.
Table 4. EDS oxides compositions (mol %) of MBGs3.6F before and after 168 h of SBF soaking.
MBG3.6FSiO2P2O5CaOCeO2
before 77.14.814.53.6
after (circle 1) 2.623.673.8-
after (circle 2)3.920.775.4-
after (circle 3)3.323.373.4-
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Giordana, A.; Cavazzoli, C.; Fraulini, F.; Zardi, P.; Zambon, A.; Cerrato, G.; Lusvardi, G. Evaluation of the Properties of Bioactive Mesoporous Glasses Doped with Cerium and Loaded with Polyphenols. Materials 2025, 18, 709. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18030709

AMA Style

Giordana A, Cavazzoli C, Fraulini F, Zardi P, Zambon A, Cerrato G, Lusvardi G. Evaluation of the Properties of Bioactive Mesoporous Glasses Doped with Cerium and Loaded with Polyphenols. Materials. 2025; 18(3):709. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18030709

Chicago/Turabian Style

Giordana, Alessia, Chiara Cavazzoli, Francesca Fraulini, Paolo Zardi, Alfonso Zambon, Giuseppina Cerrato, and Gigliola Lusvardi. 2025. "Evaluation of the Properties of Bioactive Mesoporous Glasses Doped with Cerium and Loaded with Polyphenols" Materials 18, no. 3: 709. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18030709

APA Style

Giordana, A., Cavazzoli, C., Fraulini, F., Zardi, P., Zambon, A., Cerrato, G., & Lusvardi, G. (2025). Evaluation of the Properties of Bioactive Mesoporous Glasses Doped with Cerium and Loaded with Polyphenols. Materials, 18(3), 709. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18030709

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop