Next Article in Journal
An Experimental and Numerical Investigation on Enhancing the Ballistic Resistance of 316L Stainless Steel Plates Against Blunt Projectiles by Covering with 2024-T351 Aluminum Alloy Thin Plates
Previous Article in Journal
Optimization of Internal Chip Evacuation Cutting Tool System for Deep Bottle Holes Based on Chip Morphology Control
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Transparent Wood Fiber-Reinforced Epoxy-Resin Electromagnetic-Shielding Materials with Superior Mechanical Strength and Thermal Insulation Performance

1
College of Art and Design, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
2
College of Furnishings and Industrial Design, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
3
School of Economics and Management, Huainan Normal University, Huainan 232001, China
4
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of North Texas, Denton, TX 76207, USA
5
Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center of Efffcient Processing and Utilization of Forest Resources, International Innovation Center for Forest Chemicals and Materials, College of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Retired.
Materials 2025, 18(18), 4262; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18184262
Submission received: 25 July 2025 / Revised: 30 August 2025 / Accepted: 2 September 2025 / Published: 11 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Materials Physics)

Abstract

The development of electromagnetic-shielding materials that not only meet the requirements of electromagnetic shielding but also possess transparency and additional functionalities is a new trend in the field. In this study, delignified wood fibers were used as the base material, which were impregnated in epoxy resin and then reinforced with three types of electromagnetic-shielding fillers: chopped carbon fibers, silicon carbide particles, and nano-silica. The experimental results showed that the resulting wood fiber-reinforced epoxy-resin electromagnetic-shielding transparent material not only exhibited excellent mechanical strength and thermal insulation properties but also achieved high haze and effective electromagnetic-shielding efficiency (greater than 90%) while maintaining a transmittance of approximately 50%. Based on the orthogonal experimental results, the optimal performance of the wood fiber-reinforced epoxy-resin electromagnetic-shielding transparent material was obtained when chopped carbon fibers were used as the electromagnetic-shielding filler component, with an electromagnetic-shielding filler mass fraction of 0.3 wt% and a wood fiber mass fraction of 5.0 wt%.

1. Introduction

The rapid advancement of electronic technology has significantly enhanced the convenience of modern life. However, when the electromagnetic-radiation intensity of electronic devices exceeds a critical threshold, it gives rise to electromagnetic pollution. This form of pollution not only compromises the precision and operational reliability of electronic systems but also poses serious risks to human health [1]. Buildings, as essential spaces for human habitation, have become primary environments for electromagnetic pollution. The combined effects of outdoor sources such as 4G/5G base stations, power substations, high-voltage transmission lines, and TV broadcasting towers, together with indoor sources including household appliances, kitchen equipment, and office electronics, have intensified the severity of indoor electromagnetic-radiation exposure [2,3].
To mitigate electromagnetic pollution, it is imperative to enhance regulatory standards and monitoring frameworks for electromagnetic radiation in built environments, while simultaneously advancing the development of protective technologies [2]. Among these, electromagnetic shielding and absorption are core strategies for mitigating radiation hazards. Electromagnetic shielding involves the use of designated materials or structural designs to inhibit the penetration of external electromagnetic fields into protected zones and is widely recognized as the most effective method for radiation suppression. A wide range of shielding materials tailored for architectural applications—such as electromagnetic-shielding concrete, absorbing coatings, shielding glass, and conductive fabrics—have been developed globally [4,5,6,7].
From a materials science perspective, high-performance electromagnetic-shielding materials must exhibit a balanced integration of attributes: lightweight, high shielding effectiveness, durability, ease of fabrication, cost-efficiency, and robust mechanical integrity. In building applications, additional requirements emerge, including elevated mechanical strength and thermal-insulation performance. For components such as windows, skylights, and decorative partitions, maintaining a requisite level of optical transparency is also essential. In this regard, notable progress has been made by researchers and engineers [6,7,8,9,10]. Nevertheless, the fabrication of composite materials that simultaneously achieve optical transparency and effective electromagnetic shielding remains a considerable challenge—particularly when deployed in structural contexts where mechanical robustness and thermal performance are non-negotiable.
Transparent wood has emerged as a novel and promising multifunctional material platform, attracting considerable interest due to its sustainability, low cost, favorable optical properties, excellent mechanical strength, and low thermal conductivity [8,9,10,11,12,13]. Zhang et al. [8] comprehensively reviewed the structural features, chemical composition, and performance-determining factors of transparent wood. Recent research has demonstrated the feasibility of endowing transparent wood with electromagnetic-shielding capabilities [14,15,16,17,18,19]. Methods explored include the application of indium tin oxide (ITO) coatings and the incorporation of magnetic nanoparticles such as Fe3O4 to enhance shielding efficiency [17,18]. Furthermore, through structural and compositional optimization, the electromagnetic-shielding performance can be further improved, positioning transparent wood as a sustainable alternative for electromagnetic-shielding applications [18]. However, current fabrication techniques often rely on delignified wood templates, which restrict sample sizes to millimeter or centimeter scales—thereby limiting their broader applicability.
The present study builds on the author’s previous work in transparent wood-fiber-material development [19], which successfully replaced bulk wood boards with lignin-depleted wood fibers to fabricate large-area transparent composites with improved functional performance [19,20]. In this work, three types of electromagnetic-shielding fillers—short carbon fibers (C), silicon carbide (SiC) particles, and titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles—were incorporated into an epoxy-resin matrix reinforced with wood fibers to fabricate fiber-reinforced epoxy-based electromagnetic-shielding transparent wood (FEESTW). Using orthogonal experimental design, the study systematically investigated the effects of filler type, filler content, and wood fiber content on electromagnetic-shielding effectiveness, as well as the optical, thermal, mechanical, and acoustic properties of the composite material. The goal was to develop a series of multifunctional, high-performance, transparent wood-based electromagnetic-shielding materials suitable for a range of applications including architecture, packaging, and energy-saving systems. These materials can regulate electromagnetic radiation within acceptable limits while fulfilling structural and functional requirements, thus enabling effective control of electromagnetic environments and safeguarding human health and well-being.

2. Experiment

2.1. Experimental Materials

To optimize the overall performance characteristics, wood fiber-reinforced epoxy-resin transparent composites were fabricated utilizing 40-mesh wood fibers as the reinforcing phase. The polymer matrix consisted of carboxyl-terminated bisphenol A epoxy resin (Nanjing Biochemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China). The electromagnetic-shielding fillers comprised short carbon fibers with a diameter of 7 μm and length of 0.5 mm (Carbon Tech Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China), silicon carbide (SiC) particles (Shanghai Pantian Powder Material Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), and titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles with particle sizes of <5 nm (Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). Additional reagents included anhydrous ethanol and deionized water, both of analytical grade.

2.2. Preparation Method

The fabrication process of wood fiber-reinforced epoxy-resin electromagnetic-shielding transparent composites is illustrated in Figure 1 and detailed as follows:
Figure 1 shows the preparation process of fiber-reinforced epoxy-resin electromagnetic-shielding transparent wood composites:
(1)
A predetermined quantity of wood powder fibers was accurately weighed using a precision electronic balance and immersed in anhydrous ethanol for subsequent processing.
(2)
The ethanol was carefully expelled, leaving the wood fibers in a slightly damp state. The fibers were then thoroughly mixed with the corresponding proportion of epoxy resin component A through mechanical stirring with a glass rod, followed by ultrasonic treatment to ensure homogeneous dispersion.
(3)
The resulting mixture was placed in a vacuum drying oven and evacuated for 10 min to achieve complete ethanol evaporation.
(4)
A predetermined amount of electromagnetic-shielding filler powder and the corresponding proportion of curing agent B were incorporated into the mixture. The components were thoroughly blended using mechanical stirring and ultrasonic treatment to ensure uniform distribution throughout the matrix.
(5)
The homogenized mixture was cast into a designated mold and placed in a vacuum drying oven. Curing was performed at 45 °C for 6 h to obtain the final wood fiber-reinforced epoxy-resin electromagnetic-shielding transparent composite.
Based on this preparation methodology, the present study systematically investigated the influence of electromagnetic-shielding filler composition, filler mass fraction, and wood fiber content on the properties of the resulting composites. An orthogonal experimental design was implemented to evaluate the effects of electromagnetic-shielding filler components, primarily carbon fibers and SiC particles, while incorporating the functional properties of TiO2 nanoparticles. The parameter levels for electromagnetic-shielding filler composition, filler mass fraction, and wood fiber content are summarized in Table 1, with the corresponding experimental matrix presented in Table 2.
Figure 2 presents representative samples of 12 wood fiber-reinforced epoxy-resin electromagnetic-shielding transparent composites, corresponding to the experimental conditions outlined in Table 2. The results demonstrate that preparation parameters exert significant influence on material homogeneity and pore structure, consequently affecting sample performance characteristics. Subsequent quantitative analysis systematically evaluates these parametric effects.

2.3. Performance Characterization Methods

The comprehensive characterization of wood fiber-reinforced epoxy-resin electromagnetic-shielding transparent composites encompassed material morphology and microstructure, electromagnetic wave-absorption properties, electromagnetic-shielding effectiveness, optical properties, thermal behavior, and mechanical performance. The fundamental principle of electromagnetic-wave absorption and shielding is illustrated in Figure 3. When incident electromagnetic waves interact with the shielding material, the electromagnetic energy undergoes partitioning into three distinct components [7]: (1) surface reflection at the material interface, (2) multiple internal reflections and absorption within the material matrix, and (3) residual electromagnetic-wave transmission through the material. Throughout these interaction processes, electromagnetic-wave energy attenuation occurs through three primary mechanisms: reflection loss (surface reflection), absorption loss (dielectric and magnetic losses), and multiple reflection loss (internal scattering and re-reflection phenomena).
The electromagnetic-shielding performance was quantitatively evaluated using the shielding effectiveness (SE). The total shielding effectiveness (SEtotal) can be expressed as follows [21]:
SEtotal = 10 log 10 P 1 / P 2
In this context, P1 and P2 represent the power density functions of the incident wave and transmitted wave, respectively.
The absorption performance can be characterized by the reflection loss (RL), which is defined as the difference between the incident power and the reflected power [22]:
R L = 10 log 10 P R / P 1
PR represents the power density function of the reflected wave.
During the testing process, following the GJB 2038A-2011 “Method for Reflectivity Testing of Radar Absorbing Materials”, the electromagnetic properties of the material were measured using an E5061A Vector Network Analyzer (Keysight Technologies, Santa Rosa, CA, USA). The NRW method was employed to determine the complex permittivity ε and permeability µ of the tested samples. Subsequently, the reflection loss (RL), wave impedance (Zin), and electromagnetic-wave attenuation constant (α) were calculated [22]. These parameters were used to determine the electromagnetic-shielding effectiveness of the material:
S E = A + R + M
A represents absorption loss, R represents reflection loss, and M represents multiple reflection loss. Absorption loss was generated by induced eddy currents:
A = 20 log 10 exp ( α t ) = 8.68 α t
t represents the thickness of the material, and α represents the electrical conductivity.
Multiple reflection loss was generated as electromagnetic waves underwent successive reflections and transmissions through the shielding material, and its magnitude is as follows [23]:
M = 20 log 10 1 Γ 1 2 e 2 α t
Γ 1 represents the reflection coefficient, which satisfies the following relationship [23]:
Γ 1 2 = 1 1 / 10 R L / 20
The frequency range of electromagnetic waves is vast, spanning over twenty orders of magnitude, from extremely low frequencies to high-energy radiation. This article focused on the X-band electromagnetic waves, which are widely used in space research, communication broadcasting, meteorological satellites, and other applications. The frequency range of the X-band was 8.0 to 12.4 GHz. The corresponding test sample size was 10.2 × 22.9 × 1.5 mm.
The characterization methods and literature references for optical properties, thermal properties, and mechanical properties are consistent as stated in reference [19]. The microstructure of the sample was observed using a JSM-6700F field emission scanning electron microscope. The optical performance of the sample mainly focuses on its transparency and haze, which are measured using a Hitachi U-4100 spectrophotometer (Hitachi, U-4100, Tokyo, Japan) according to ASTM D1003 “Standard Method for Haze and Transmittance of Transparent Plastics”. The thermal conductivity is measured using the heat flow meter method according to the requirements of GB/T 10294 and is measured using an EKO HC-074-200 thermal conductivity meter from the United States. The mechanical properties are tested using a multifunctional mechanical testing machine (AGS-X) in accordance with “GB/T 1041-2008 Determination of Plastic Compression Properties”.

3. Results

This study primarily investigated the microstructural characteristics, fundamental properties (optical, thermal, and mechanical properties), and electromagnetic-shielding effectiveness of wood fiber-reinforced epoxy-resin transparent composites. Through electron microscopy analysis, the interfacial relationships between wood fibers and electromagnetic-shielding fillers, as well as their influence on material properties, were elucidated. Range analysis was employed to determine the primary and secondary factor relationships governing material properties and their optimal parameter combinations.
Figure 4 presents typical SEM micrographs of wood fiber-reinforced epoxy-resin electromagnetic-shielding transparent composites containing C, SiC, C-SiC, and TiO2 electromagnetic-shielding fillers. The carbon powder exhibited a short-fiber morphology, and owing to the substantially higher mechanical strength of carbon fibers relative to the polymer matrix, they displayed characteristic fiber pull-out behavior at the interface, indicating favorable interfacial adhesion between carbon fibers and the epoxy matrix. SiC particles appeared as discrete entities uniformly dispersed within the polymer matrix, while TiO2 nanoparticles demonstrated fine particle size distribution and homogeneous dispersion throughout the epoxy-resin matrix. Figure 5 shows the SEM micrographs of CEO-5 and CEO-7. The samples of both formulations showed significant mixing effects, and there were obvious interface defects between the matrix and the doped phase, which also had a significant impact on their performance. We will further analyze this feature in the following text.

3.1. Structure and Performance Characterization

The characteristic optical properties of wood fiber-reinforced epoxy-resin electromagnetic-shielding transparent composites are illustrated in Figure 6. The optical performance of samples prepared under different parametric conditions exhibited consistent spectral trends with varying wavelengths, while demonstrating significant quantitative differences. Transmittance and haze generally displayed an inverse correlation, with higher transmittance corresponding to reduced haze values, although specific samples (CEO-5 and CEO-7) deviated from this conventional relationship. Comparative analysis of optical properties revealed that CEO-5 and CEO-7 exhibited substantially lower transmittance relative to other samples, accompanied by anomalous haze characteristics. This phenomenon was primarily attributed to elevated wood fiber content in these composites, which promoted bubble formation during the curing and consolidation process (as depicted in Figure 5. The presence of these voids increased the optical scattering cross-section, resulting in diminished transmittance and enhanced haze. This porous microstructural feature concurrently influenced other material properties, which are systematically analyzed in subsequent sections.
Figure 6a,b illustrate the transmittance and haze of 12 different material types at a wavelength of 550 nm, enabling a direct comparison of their optical-performance parameters at this specific wavelength. The range analysis results of the C-SiC-wood fiber orthogonal experiment are presented in Table 3. According to the analysis, the wood fiber mass fraction exerted the most significant influence on transmittance, followed by the type of electromagnetic-shielding filler and its mass fraction. The optimal parameter combination for maximizing transmittance was identified as a wood fiber mass fraction of 5 wt.%, a SiC electromagnetic-shielding filler, and a filler mass fraction of 0.1 wt.%. In terms of haze, the most influential factor was the electromagnetic-shielding filler mass fraction, followed by the wood fiber mass fraction and the filler type. The combination that yielded the highest haze consisted of a 0.3 wt.% electromagnetic-shielding filler mass fraction, a 10 wt.% wood fiber mass fraction, and a C-type filler. Taking both transmittance and haze into consideration, the optimal overall performance was achieved by sample CEO-3, which exhibited a transmittance of 48.6% and a haze value of 57.9%.
Additionally, Figure 6c,d depicts the transmittance and haze of samples with varying TiO2 content. A clear trend is observed: as the TiO2 mass fraction increases, transmittance decreases while haze increases. When the TiO2 mass fraction reached 0.3 wt.%, the material exhibited relatively balanced optical performance, slightly surpassing that of the C-SiC-wood fiber system.
The typical thermal properties of wood fiber-reinforced epoxy-resin electromagnetic-shielding transparent materials are shown in Figure 7, with the thermal conductivity of the nine C-SiC orthogonal experimental materials ranging from 0.179 to 0.283 W/m∙K. The relationship between factor levels and thermal conductivity is shown in Figure 8. Through range analysis, it can be concluded that the order of importance of the factors affecting thermal conductivity is as follows: electromagnetic-shielding filler mass fraction, type of electromagnetic-shielding filler, and wood fiber mass fraction. Looking at the types of electromagnetic-shielding fillers, chopped carbon fibers have a greater influence on thermal conductivity, which is related to the fact that carbon fibers are good thermal conductors. The parameter combination for the best thermal insulation performance is as follows: electromagnetic-shielding filler mass fraction of 0.3 wt%, type of electromagnetic-shielding filler as SiC, and wood fiber mass fraction of 5 wt%. When the electromagnetic-shielding filler is TiO2, the thermal conductivity ranges from 0.203 to 0.223 W/m∙K, with the highest thermal conductivity at a TiO2 mass fraction of 0.3 wt%. Compared with non-electromagnetic-shielding wood fiber epoxy-resin transparent materials, the addition of the three types of electromagnetic-shielding fillers results in minimal differences in thermal conductivity, all maintaining a low level of around 0.2 W/m∙K, indicating good thermal insulation characteristics.
The typical mechanical properties are presented in Figure 9a,b, where the tensile strength of the materials ranges from 40 to 70 MPa. The results of the C-SiC orthogonal experiment revealed significant variation across the samples. A notable enhancement in strength was observed in materials containing electromagnetic-shielding fillers compared with those without, effectively addressing the issue of “virtual contact” at the interface between the wood fiber reinforcement and the epoxy-resin matrix caused by their differing polarities. This interfacial improvement substantially increased the overall material strength.
As shown in Table 4, range analysis of tensile strength indicated that the most influential factor was the wood fiber mass fraction, followed by the type of electromagnetic-shielding filler and its mass fraction. The optimal parameter combination for maximizing strength was identified as a wood fiber mass fraction of 2.5 wt.%, a short-cut carbon fiber filler, and a filler mass fraction of 0.3 wt.%.
Figure 9 also illustrates the mechanical properties of TiO2-reinforced materials, which exhibited tensile strengths in the range of 50–60 MPa, increasing with higher TiO2 content. This improvement is attributed to the nanoscale TiO2 particles enhancing interfacial adhesion between the fibers and the epoxy matrix.

3.2. Analysis of Absorption Performance

The dielectric properties of C-SiC electromagnetic-shielding filler-modified wood fiber-reinforced epoxy-resin transparent materials are illustrated in Figure 10. The real part of the dielectric constant reflects the material’s capacitance, indicating its capacity to store electric energy under an external electric field. In contrast, the imaginary part represents dielectric loss—commonly referred to as the loss factor—which quantifies the dissipation of electric energy into the external field. A higher value of the imaginary component signifies greater electrical conductivity and, consequently, lower insulation performance.
The ratio of the imaginary to the real part of the dielectric constant, known as the loss tangent, reflects the material’s ability to couple with incident microwaves. A higher loss tangent denotes stronger microwave-absorption capability. Figure 11 presents the loss tangent values for the nine groups of samples evaluated in the orthogonal experiment.
According to the test results, the real part of the dielectric constant exhibited minor fluctuations across the frequency range, indicating good overall stability. Meanwhile, both the imaginary part and the loss tangent showed a slight increase with rising electromagnetic-wave frequency. When comparing the dielectric performance of materials fabricated under different parameter combinations, sample CEO-1 demonstrated the most favorable dielectric characteristics, with the highest values for the real part, imaginary part, and loss tangent. This was followed by CEO-3 and CEO-4, which corresponded to the second-highest mass fractions of short-cut carbon fibers. These results suggest that short-cut carbon fibers were the dominant factor affecting the dielectric behavior in the C-SiC orthogonal experiment.
In the subsequent analysis, a more quantitative assessment will be conducted, focusing on reflection loss, electromagnetic-wave attenuation constant, and overall electromagnetic-shielding effectiveness.
The reflection loss and electromagnetic-wave attenuation constant of the materials were calculated using the computational methods outlined in Section 2.3. The corresponding results are presented in Figure 12 and Figure 13, with a fixed sample thickness of 3 mm used for all calculations. The data indicate that although the reflection loss of the C-SiC orthogonal experiment materials was relatively limited, the electromagnetic-wave attenuation constant was considerably high. Among the nine tested samples, CEO-1 exhibited the most pronounced performance in both reflection loss and attenuation constant. Specifically, its reflection loss reached a minimum value of –9.74 dB at 9.56 GHz. For frequencies above 9 GHz, the attenuation constant surpassed 50 m−1 and continued to increase with frequency, albeit with slight fluctuations.
Figure 14 illustrates the reflection loss of wood fiber-reinforced epoxy-resin electromagnetic-shielding transparent materials at varying sample thicknesses. The results reveal that, as thickness increased, the minimum reflection loss initially decreased and then increased, while the corresponding frequency of minimum reflection loss shifted from higher to lower values. Optimal absorption performance was observed in samples with thicknesses ranging from 2.5 to 3.0 mm.
This shift in peak reflection-loss frequency can be interpreted through the quarter-wavelength cancelation theory [24,25], in which the sample thickness d and the frequency fm corresponding to the reflection-loss minimum are related by the following equation:
f m = c 4 d μ r ε r 1 + tan 2 δ 8
where μ r and ε r are the complex permittivity and complex permeability, c is the speed of light in vacuum, and tan δ is the loss tangent of the dielectric. It is evident that for the same material, μ r , ε r tan δ remained consistent, and as the thickness of the material increased, the corresponding fm decreased.
The average reflection loss across the tested frequency range was calculated, as shown in Figure 15. To further investigate the factors influencing the absorption performance of wood fiber-reinforced epoxy-resin electromagnetic-shielding transparent materials, an extreme difference analysis was conducted based on this parameter, with the results presented in Figure 16. The primary factors affecting the absorption performance of the C-SiC-epoxy-resin composite materials, in descending order of influence, were identified as the type of electromagnetic-shielding filler, the filler mass fraction, and the wood fiber mass fraction.
The optimal absorption performance was achieved when the electromagnetic-shielding filler was short-cut carbon fibers, the filler mass fraction was 0.5 wt.%, and the wood fiber mass fraction was 2.5 wt.%. Furthermore, the computational results indicate that short-cut carbon fibers contributed substantially more to absorption performance compared with SiC and TiO2. In contrast, the effect of TiO2 mass fraction on absorption performance was relatively limited, with the best performance observed at a TiO2 content of 0.5 wt.%.

3.3. Electromagnetic Shielding Effectiveness Analysis

The electromagnetic-shielding effectiveness (EMSE) was calculated using Equation (1), and the results are shown in Figure 17. The C-SiC-epoxy-resin orthogonal experiment materials exhibited significant variation in EMSE. A quantitative evaluation was carried out by calculating the average shielding effectiveness across the tested frequency range, as illustrated in Figure 18. The EMSE values for the nine groups of C-SiC-epoxy-resin composites ranged from 5.1 dB to 23.2 dB, corresponding to shielding efficiencies between 69.2% and 99.5%.
These results demonstrate that, even under controlled conditions where the mass fraction of electromagnetic-shielding fillers was limited to preserve transparency and haze, the materials still effectively attenuated electromagnetic radiation. This indicates their potential as architectural materials capable of mitigating radiation exposure and safeguarding human health.
Figure 17 also includes the EMSE performance of TiO2-enhanced materials. The optimal performance was observed at a TiO2 filler mass fraction of 0.5 wt.%, achieving a shielding effectiveness of 9.16 dB.
The results of the extreme difference analysis for electromagnetic-shielding effectiveness (EMSE) are summarized in Table 5. It is evident that the most critical factor influencing EMSE is the type of electromagnetic-shielding filler. The incorporation of short-cut carbon fibers significantly enhanced the shielding performance. The second most influential factor was the mass fraction of the electromagnetic-shielding filler, with higher filler content corresponding to increased shielding effectiveness.
In contrast, the influence of wood fiber content on EMSE was minimal. Within the parameter range investigated in this study, its effect can be considered negligible. The optimal combination of preparation parameters for achieving the highest EMSE was determined to be a 0.5 wt.% electromagnetic-shielding filler mass fraction, short-cut carbon fibers as the shielding component, and a wood fiber mass fraction of 2.5 wt.%.

4. Conclusions and Discussion

In this study, a series of wood fiber-reinforced epoxy-resin electromagnetic-shielding transparent materials were fabricated using short-cut carbon fibers, SiC, and nano-TiO2 particles as electromagnetic-shielding fillers. A comprehensive investigation was conducted on macroscopic morphology, microscopic structure, optical properties, thermal properties, mechanical properties, absorption performance, electromagnetic-shielding effectiveness, and the underlying shielding mechanisms of these materials. The effects of electromagnetic-shielding filler type, filler mass fraction, and wood fiber mass fraction on the material properties were systematically analyzed.
Based on the orthogonal experimental results, the optimal parameter combinations for various performance metrics are summarized in Table 6. It was found that the primary and secondary influencing factors for electromagnetic-shielding performance and absorption were consistent with the optimized combination derived from the orthogonal design, namely the CEO-1 configuration.
To further validate the reliability of the orthogonal experiment results, additional samples were prepared with an alternative parameter combination optimized for haze. The selected parameters were 0.3 wt.% electromagnetic-shielding filler mass fraction, short-cut carbon fibers as the filler component, and a 10 wt.% wood fiber mass fraction. Optical performance tests were conducted on these samples, and the fabricated materials along with their optical test results are shown in Figure 19.
The experimental data indicated that the transmittance and haze of the haze-optimized samples at 550 nm were 37.5% and 79.3%, respectively. Notably, the haze value achieved by this optimized scheme exceeded that of the orthogonal experiment, demonstrating that this optimization strategy can effectively enhance haze while maintaining desirable levels of transparency.
In summary, the wood fiber-reinforced epoxy-resin electromagnetic-shielding transparent material prepared in this article has excellent mechanical strength and insulation performance, achieving high haze and effective electromagnetic-shielding efficiency (greater than 90%) while maintaining a light transmittance of about 50%. According to the results of orthogonal experiments, the comprehensive performance of the wood fiber-reinforced epoxy-resin electromagnetic-shielding transparent material is optimal when short-cut carbon fiber is used as the electromagnetic-shielding filler component, the mass fraction of electromagnetic-shielding filler is 0.3 wt%, and the mass fraction of wood fiber is 5.0 wt%. The work of this article extends the functional characteristics of wood fiber transparent wood, clarifies the influence of adding short-cut carbon fibers, SiC, and nano TiO2 particles on the electromagnetic-shielding function of wood fiber transparent wood, and obtains performance optimization parameters. Compared with transparent materials with electromagnetic-shielding properties reported in the literature, the material obtained in this paper has significant comprehensive advantages. Compared with the material obtained by Gan [17] adding Fe3O4 and Cheng et al. [26] composite silver nanowires (AgNW), our material can increase transparency from 28.8% to about 50% in the visible light range, and the longitudinal tensile strength can be increased from 47.8 MPa to 70 MPa. The EMI shielding effect in the X-band can reach 25 dB. At the same time, the material obtained in this paper has low thermal conductivity, a low preparation cost, and easy processing, which can meet the needs of human electromagnetic protection and has broad development prospects.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.Z. and Y.Z.; methodology, L.C. and Z.Z.; formal analysis, J.G.; investigation, J.G.; resources, Z.Z.; data curation, J.G., Z.W., L.Z. and Y.G.; writing—original draft preparation, J.G.; writing—review and editing, J.G., Z.W., L.Z., Y.G., L.C., Z.Z. and Y.Z.; supervision, Y.Z.; funding acquisition, Y.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by 2025 Nanjing Forestry University Young Teachers’ Teaching Ability Improvement Project; 2025 Nanjing Forestry University Industry-University Cooperation Joint Course Project; 2025 Provincial Association for Science and Technology Society Capability Improvement Special Plan Project.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. AEberbert, L.K. Biolgic Effect of Environmental Electromagnetism; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1981. [Google Scholar]
  2. Zhang, T.M. Indoor electromagnetic environmental pollution in buildings and its protection. China Build. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2019, 28, 93–97. [Google Scholar]
  3. Han, R.J.; Cheng, Z.Q.; Lu, Y.J. Research Progress of Electromagnetic Shielding Materials for Buildings. Build. Mater. World 2018, 39, 29–32. [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen, Z.; Xu, C.; Ma, C.; Ren, W.; Cheng, H.-M. Lightweight and flexible graphene foam composites for high performance electromagnetic interference shielding. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 1296–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zhang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Chen, H.; Huang, Z.; Yang, Y.; Xiao, P.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, Y. Composition and structure control of ultralight graphene foam for high-performance microwave absorption. Carbon 2016, 105, 438–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, Z.; Wei, R.; Gu, J.; Liu, H.; Liu, C.; Luo, C.; Kong, J.; Shao, Q.; Wang, N.; Guo, Z.; et al. Ultralight, highly compressible and fire-retardant graphene aerogel with self-adjustable electromagnetic wave absorption. Carbon 2018, 139, 1126–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, C.; Murugadoss, V.; Kong, J.; He, Z.; Mai, X.; Shao, Q.; Chen, Y.; Guo, L.; Liu, C.; Angaiah, S.; et al. Overview of carbon nanostructures and nanocomposites for electromagnetic wave shielding. Carbon 2018, 140, 696–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Song, J.; Chen, C.; Zhu, S.; Zhu, M.; Dai, J.; Ray, U.; Li, Y.; Kuang, Y.; Li, Y.; Quispe, N.; et al. Processing bulk natural wood into a high-performance structural material. Nature 2018, 554, 224–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, J.; Zhang, D.; Chu, F. Wood-Derived Functional Polymeric Materials. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2001135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, Y.; Vasileva, E.; Sychugov, I.; Popov, S.; Berglund, L. Optically Transparent Wood: Recent Progress, Opportunities, and Challenges. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2018, 6, 1800059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhu, M.; Li, T.; Davis, C.S.; Yao, Y.; Dai, J.; Wang, Y.; AlQatari, F.; Gilman, J.W.; Hu, L. Transparent and haze wood composites for highly efficient broadband light management in solar cells. Nano Energy 2016, 26, 332–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mi, R.; Li, T.; Dalgo, D.; Chen, C.; Kuang, Y.; He, S.; Zhao, X.; Xie, W.; Gan, W.; Zhu, J.; et al. A Clear, Strong, and Thermally Insulated Transparent Wood for Energy Efficient Windows. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 1907511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, Y.; Yu, S.; Veinot, J.G.C.; Linnros, J.; Berglund, L.; Sychugov, I. Luminescent Transparent Wood. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2017, 5, 1600834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, J.; Koubaa, A.; Tao, Y.; Li, P.; Xing, D. The emerging development of transparent wood: Materials, characteristics, and applications. Curr. Forestry Rep. 2022, 8, 333–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cho, S.S.; Song, S.H.; Hong, I.P. Analysis of the electromagnetic properties of eco-friendly transparent wood. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 2021, 63, 2237–2241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fu, Q.; Yan, M.; Jungstedt, E.; Yang, X.; Li, Y.; Berglund, L.A. Transparent plywood as a load-bearing and luminescent biocomposite. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2018, 164, 296–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gan, W.; Gao, L.; Xiao, S.; Zhang, W.; Zhan, X.; Li, J. Transparent magnetic wood composites based on immobilizingFe3O4 nanoparticles into a delignified wood template. J. Mater. Sci. 2017, 52, 3321–3329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, L.; Wang, Z.; Ning, G.Y. Research progress of wood-based conductive electromagnetic shielding materials. Mater. Rep. 2018, 32, 2320–2328. [Google Scholar]
  19. Gao, J.; Wang, X.; Tong, J.; Kuai, B.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Li, G.; Huang, Z.; Cai, L. Large size translucent wood fiber reinforced PMMA porous composites with excellent thermal, acoustic and energy absorption properties. Compos. Commun. 2022, 30, 101059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gao, J.; Wang, X.; Xu, Q.; Kuai, B.; Wang, Z.; Cai, L.; Ge, S.; Zhang, Y.L.; Li, G. Efficient preparation and properties of wood fiber transparent materials with powdered wood. Ind. Crops Prod. 2023, 193, 116291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Xu, Y.D. Electromagnetic Interference Shielding Polymer Composites: Structural Design and Performance Research; North University of China: Taiyuan, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  22. Yao, P. Microwave Absorption and Shielding Properties of MAX Phase Ceramics and Their Composites with SiC; University of Science and Technology of China: Hefei, China, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  23. Peng, M.; Qin, F. Clarification of basic concepts for electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness. J. Appl. Phys. 2021, 130, 225108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lim, K.; Kim, M.; Lee, K.; Park, C.G. Electromagnetic wave absorption properties of amorphous alloyferrite-epoxy composites in quasi-microwave band. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2003, 39, 1836–1841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, T.; Chen, G.; Zhu, J.; Gong, H.; Zhang, L.; Wu, H. Deep understanding of impedance matching and quarter wavelength theory in electromagnetic wave absorption. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021, 595, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cheng, M.; Ying, M.; Zhao, R.; Ji, L.; Li, H.; Liu, X.; Zhang, J.; Li, Y.; Dong, X.; Zhang, X. Transparent and Flexible Electromagnetic Interference Shielding Materials by Constructing Sandwich AgNW @ MXene/Wood Composites. ACS Nano 2022, 16, 16996–17007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Preparation process of fiber-reinforced epoxy-resin electromagnetic-shielding transparent wood.
Figure 1. Preparation process of fiber-reinforced epoxy-resin electromagnetic-shielding transparent wood.
Materials 18 04262 g001
Figure 2. FEESTW samples prepared with different parameters.
Figure 2. FEESTW samples prepared with different parameters.
Materials 18 04262 g002
Figure 3. Principle of material electromagnetic shielding.
Figure 3. Principle of material electromagnetic shielding.
Materials 18 04262 g003
Figure 4. SEM images of FEESTW samples. (a) Typical C-containing powder materials (CEO-1). (b) Typical SiC-containing powder materials (CEO-2). (c) Typical CEO-3-containing powder materials (CEO-3). (d) Typical TiO2-containing powder materials (CET-1). WF: wood Fiber.
Figure 4. SEM images of FEESTW samples. (a) Typical C-containing powder materials (CEO-1). (b) Typical SiC-containing powder materials (CEO-2). (c) Typical CEO-3-containing powder materials (CEO-3). (d) Typical TiO2-containing powder materials (CET-1). WF: wood Fiber.
Materials 18 04262 g004
Figure 5. SEM images of low transparency FEESTW samples. (a) CEO-5, (b) CEO-7.
Figure 5. SEM images of low transparency FEESTW samples. (a) CEO-5, (b) CEO-7.
Materials 18 04262 g005
Figure 6. Typical optic performance of FEESTW samples prepared with different parameters. (a) Luminousness, (b) haze, (c) transparency at 550 nm, (d) haze at 550 nm.
Figure 6. Typical optic performance of FEESTW samples prepared with different parameters. (a) Luminousness, (b) haze, (c) transparency at 550 nm, (d) haze at 550 nm.
Materials 18 04262 g006
Figure 7. Typical thermal performance of FEESTW samples prepared with different parameters.
Figure 7. Typical thermal performance of FEESTW samples prepared with different parameters.
Materials 18 04262 g007
Figure 8. Relationship between factor level and thermal conductivity.
Figure 8. Relationship between factor level and thermal conductivity.
Materials 18 04262 g008
Figure 9. Typical mechanical performance of FEESTW samples prepared with different parameters. (a) Typical stress–strain curve, (b) material strength.
Figure 9. Typical mechanical performance of FEESTW samples prepared with different parameters. (a) Typical stress–strain curve, (b) material strength.
Materials 18 04262 g009
Figure 10. Dielectric constant of FEESTW samples. (a) Real part of the dielectric constant, (b) imaginary part of the dielectric constant.
Figure 10. Dielectric constant of FEESTW samples. (a) Real part of the dielectric constant, (b) imaginary part of the dielectric constant.
Materials 18 04262 g010
Figure 11. Dielectric loss angle tangents of FEESTW samples.
Figure 11. Dielectric loss angle tangents of FEESTW samples.
Materials 18 04262 g011
Figure 12. Reflection-loss curves of FEESTW samples.
Figure 12. Reflection-loss curves of FEESTW samples.
Materials 18 04262 g012
Figure 13. Attenuation constant of FEESTW samples.
Figure 13. Attenuation constant of FEESTW samples.
Materials 18 04262 g013
Figure 14. Reflection-loss curves of different FEESTW samples with different thicknesses.
Figure 14. Reflection-loss curves of different FEESTW samples with different thicknesses.
Materials 18 04262 g014
Figure 15. Mean reflection loss of different FEESTW samples.
Figure 15. Mean reflection loss of different FEESTW samples.
Materials 18 04262 g015
Figure 16. Relationship between factor level and mean reflection loss.
Figure 16. Relationship between factor level and mean reflection loss.
Materials 18 04262 g016
Figure 17. Electromagnetic-shielding effectiveness of FEESTW samples.
Figure 17. Electromagnetic-shielding effectiveness of FEESTW samples.
Materials 18 04262 g017
Figure 18. Electromagnetic-shielding effectiveness of 12 FEESTW samples.
Figure 18. Electromagnetic-shielding effectiveness of 12 FEESTW samples.
Materials 18 04262 g018
Figure 19. Optimization of haze parameters and its optical properties of samples. (a) Haze parameter optimization samples. (b) Optical performance of optimization samples.
Figure 19. Optimization of haze parameters and its optical properties of samples. (a) Haze parameter optimization samples. (b) Optical performance of optimization samples.
Materials 18 04262 g019
Table 1. Preparation process of fiber-reinforced epoxy-resin electromagnetic-shielding transparent wood.
Table 1. Preparation process of fiber-reinforced epoxy-resin electromagnetic-shielding transparent wood.
Influence FactorMagnetic Factor ComponentsMagnetic Factor Mass Fraction [%]Wood Fiber Mass Fraction [%]
Level
1C0.52.5
2SiC0.35
3C:SiC = 1:10.110
Table 2. Experiment table of fiber-reinforced epoxy-resin electromagnetic-shielding transparent wood.
Table 2. Experiment table of fiber-reinforced epoxy-resin electromagnetic-shielding transparent wood.
Influence FactorMagnetic Factor Mass Fraction [%]Magnetic Factor ComponentsWood Fiber Mass Fraction [%]
Experiment Number
Orthogonal ExperimentCEO-1111
CEO-2122
CEO-3133
CEO-4212
CEO-5223
CEO-6231
CEO-7313
CEO-8321
CEO-9332
TiO2 supplementary experimentCET-10.1%TiO25%
CET-20.3%TiO25%
CET-30.5%TiO25%
Table 3. Range analysis of orthogonal experimental results of FEESTW—transmittance and haze.
Table 3. Range analysis of orthogonal experimental results of FEESTW—transmittance and haze.
Treatment NumberTransmittanceHaze
Magnetic Factor Mass FractionMagnetic Factor ComponentsWood Fiber Mass FractionMagnetic Factor Mass FractionMagnetic Factor ComponentsWood Fiber Mass Fraction
K 1j155.3078.80154.70162.03194.64170.07
K 2j98.70171.80197.40223.36159.18137.19
K 3j159.10162.5061.00137.82169.38215.94
κ 1j51.7726.2751.5754.0164.8856.69
κ 2j32.9057.2765.8074.4553.0645.73
κ 3j53.0354.1720.3345.9456.4671.98
Range20.1331.0045.4728.5111.8226.25
Factor importance321132
Optimal solution322213
Table 4. Range analysis of orthogonal experimental results of FEESTW—strength.
Table 4. Range analysis of orthogonal experimental results of FEESTW—strength.
Treatment NumberMagnetic Factor ComponentsMagnetic Factor Mass Fraction [%]Wood Fiber Mass Fraction [%]
K 1j176.63169.94204.37
K 2j173.74177.051179.58
K 3j167.06170.44133.49
κ 1j58.8856.6568.12
κ 2j57.9159.0259.86
κ 3j55.6956.8244.50
Range3.192.3723.63
Factor importance231
Optimal solution121
Table 5. Range analysis of orthogonal experimental results of electromagnetic-shielding effectiveness.
Table 5. Range analysis of orthogonal experimental results of electromagnetic-shielding effectiveness.
Treatment
Number
Magnetic Factor Mass FractionMagnetic Factor ComponentsWood Fiber Mass Fraction
K 1j42.0945.1333.87
K 2j20.4617.8522.45
K 3j23.2922.8629.52
κ 1j14.0315.0411.29
κ 2j6.825.957.48
κ 3j7.767.629.84
Range7.219.093.80
Factor importance213
Optimal solution111
Table 6. Comprehensive analysis of performance parameter optimization of FEESTW.
Table 6. Comprehensive analysis of performance parameter optimization of FEESTW.
Optimization
Parameters *
Magnetic Factor Mass FractionMagnetic Factor ComponentsWood Fiber Mass Fraction
Performance
Parameters
Transmittance322
Haze213
Thermal conductivity321
Strength121
Reflective loss111
Electromagnetic-shielding effectiveness111
* Color-Coded Parameter Prioritization: Materials 18 04262 i001 Priority 1, Materials 18 04262 i002 Priority 2, Materials 18 04262 i003 Priority 3, the nu-meric values in the table correspond to the ranking or preferred level for the respective factors.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gao, J.; Wu, Z.; Zhu, L.; Gao, Y.; Cai, L.; Zhu, Z.; Zhang, Y. Transparent Wood Fiber-Reinforced Epoxy-Resin Electromagnetic-Shielding Materials with Superior Mechanical Strength and Thermal Insulation Performance. Materials 2025, 18, 4262. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18184262

AMA Style

Gao J, Wu Z, Zhu L, Gao Y, Cai L, Zhu Z, Zhang Y. Transparent Wood Fiber-Reinforced Epoxy-Resin Electromagnetic-Shielding Materials with Superior Mechanical Strength and Thermal Insulation Performance. Materials. 2025; 18(18):4262. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18184262

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gao, Jingshu, Zhen Wu, Ling Zhu, Yue Gao, Liping Cai, Zunling Zhu, and Yaoli Zhang. 2025. "Transparent Wood Fiber-Reinforced Epoxy-Resin Electromagnetic-Shielding Materials with Superior Mechanical Strength and Thermal Insulation Performance" Materials 18, no. 18: 4262. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18184262

APA Style

Gao, J., Wu, Z., Zhu, L., Gao, Y., Cai, L., Zhu, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2025). Transparent Wood Fiber-Reinforced Epoxy-Resin Electromagnetic-Shielding Materials with Superior Mechanical Strength and Thermal Insulation Performance. Materials, 18(18), 4262. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18184262

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop