Effects of Aggregate Size and Nozzle Diameter on Printability and Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Ferronickel Slag–GGBFS Concrete
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Raw Materials
2.2. Mix Proportion Design
2.3. Experimental Methods for Evaluating Printability
- Static Shear Procedure: The paste was sheared at a constant shear rate of 0.1 s−1 for 60 s. The peak shear stress obtained during this period was recorded as the static yield stress.
- Dynamic Yield Stress: A pre-shear at a shear rate of 30 s−1 was applied for 60 s to ensure uniform dispersion of the cement matrix, followed by a 30-s rest period. Subsequently, between 90 and 210 s, the shear rate was gradually increased from 0.1 s−1 to 60 s−1. During the interval from 210 to 330 s, the shear rate was uniformly decreased from 60 s−1 to 0 s−1, generating corresponding shear rate versus shear stress curves.
- Thixotropy Test: The thixotropic behavior of the 3D printed ferronickel slag–GGBFS concrete was characterized by the area enclosed between the rheological curves obtained during the increasing and decreasing shear rate segments, where the shear rate ranged from 0 to 60 s−1.
2.4. Methods for Mechanical Properties Test
3. Results and Analysis of Printing Tests
3.1. Analysis of Printability
3.1.1. Flowability and Slump
3.1.2. Extrudability
3.1.3. Buildability
3.2. Rheological Performance Analysis
3.2.1. Static Yield Stress
3.2.2. Dynamic Yield Stress
3.2.3. Thixotropy
4. Mechanical Properties Test Results and Analysis
4.1. Compressive Strength Test Results and Analysis
4.2. Flexural Strength Test Results and Analysis
4.3. Anisotropy Analysis
5. Microstructure Morphology and Analysis
5.1. Microstructure of Interlayer Interfaces Under Different Nozzle Diameters
5.2. Microstructure of Interlayer Interfaces with Different Aggregate Size Incorporated
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Aktar, M.A.; Alam, M.M.; Al-Amin, A.Q. Global economic crisis, energy use, CO2 emissions, and policy roadmap amid COVID-19. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2021, 26, 770–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, J.; Ji, G.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, G.; Mechtcherine, V.; Pan, J.; Wang, L.; Ding, T.; Duan, Z.; Du, S. Large-scale 3D printing concrete technology: Current status and future opportunities. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2021, 122, 104115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pegna, J. Exploratory investigation of solid freeform construction. Autom. Constr. 1997, 5, 427–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khoshnevis, B. Automated construction by contour crafting—Related robotics and information technologies. Autom. Constr. 2004, 13, 5–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Le, T.T.; Austin, S.A.; Lim, S.; Buswell, R.A.; Gibb, A.G.F.; Thorpe, T. Mix design and fresh properties for high-performance printing concrete. Mater. Struct. 2012, 45, 1221–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Q.; Cui, X.; Wang, J.; Li, S.; Lv, C.; Dong, Y. Effect of fly ash on rheological properties of graphene oxide cement paste. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 138, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bong, S.H.; Nematollahi, B.; Nerella, V.N.; Mechtcherine, V. Method of formulating 3D-printable strain-hardening alkali-activated composites for additive construction. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2022, 134, 104780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman, M.A.; Sarker, P.K.; Shaikh, F.U.A.; Saha, A.K. Soundness and Compressive Strength of Portland Cement Blended with Ground Granulated Ferronickel Slag. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 140, 194–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, S.; Ma, J.; Yan, B.; Li, J.R.; Liu, X.D. Characteristics of several types of nickel slag and their feasibility in cement and concrete applications. Bull. Chin. Ceram. Soc. 2019, 38, 2268–2273+2280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, F. Preparation and Properties of 3D Printed Composite Ferro Nickel Slag Concrete. Master’s Thesis, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, China, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Gao, H.; Jin, L.; Chen, Y.; Chen, Q.; Liu, X.; Yu, Q. Rheological Behavior of 3D Printed Concrete: Influential Factors and Printability Prediction Scheme. J. Build. Eng. 2024, 91, 109626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, Y.; Yang, Z.; Ding, T.; Xiao, J. Environmental and economic assessment on 3D Printed buildings with recycled concrete. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 278, 123884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, T.; Xiao, J.; Qin, F.; Duan, Z. Mechanical behavior of 3D Printed mortar with recycled sand at early ages. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 248, 118654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- An, D.; Zhang, Y.X.; Yang, R.C. Incorporating coarse aggregates into 3D concrete printing from mixture design and process control to structural behaviours and practical applications: A review. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 2024, 19, e2351154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mechtcherine, V.; Nerella, V.N.; Will, F.; Näther, M.; Otto, J.; Krause, M. Large scale digital concrete construction—CONPrint3D concept for on-site, monolithic 3D-printing. Autom. Constr. 2019, 107, 102933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, Y.; Sheng, R.; Yao, X.; Pichler, B.; Mang, H.A.; Zhang, J.-L. A three-step development strategy for 3D printable concrete containing coarse aggregates. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2025, 22, e04540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.; Liu, C.; Bai, G.; Wu, Y. Experimental study on mechanical properties of 3D Printed coarse aggregate concrete based on the pore structure defects. Chin. Civ. Eng. J. 2022, 55, 54–64. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.; Liu, C.; Bai, G.; Wu, Y.; He, C.; Zhang, R.; Wang, Y. Influence of pore defects on the hardened properties of 3D Printed concrete with coarse aggregate. Addit. Manuf. 2022, 55, 102843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, C.; Hou, Z.; Chen, C.; Zhang, Y.; Mechtcherine, V.; Sun, Z. Design of 3D printable concrete based on the relationship between flowability of cement paste and optimum aggregate content. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2019, 104, 103406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- GB/T 2419-2005; Test Method for Fluidity of Cement Mortar. Standards Press of China: Beijing, China, 2005.
- Panda, B.; Unluer, C.; Tan, M.J. Extrusion and rheology characterization of geopolymer nanocomposites used in 3D printing. Compos. Part. B Eng. 2019, 176, 107290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Liu, C.; Cao, R.; Chen, C.; Mechtcherine, V.; Zhang, Y. Systematical investigation of rheological performance regarding 3D printing process for alkali-activated materials: Effect of precursor nature. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2022, 128, 104450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- GB/T 17671-1999; Method of Testing Cements—Determination of Strength (ISO Method). Standards Press of China: Beijing, China, 1999.
- Zhu, W.; Liu, C.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, T. Rheological performance regulation and material optimization of manufactured sand concrete in 3D printing. Constr. Build. Mater. 2025, 483, 141735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Irshidat, M.; Cabibihan, J.J.; Fadli, F.; Al-Yacoubi, S.; Al-Sadah, M. Waste Materials Utilization in 3D Printable Concrete for Sustainable Construction Applications: A Review. Emergent Mater. 2025, 8, 1357–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tseng, K.-C.; Chi, M.; Yeih, W.; Huang, R. Influence of Slag/Fly Ash as Partial Cement Replacement on Printability and Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Concrete. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 3933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, M.; Li, L.; Zheng, Y.; Zhao, P.; Lu, L.; Cheng, X. Rheological and mechanical properties of admixtures modified 3D printing sulphoaluminate cementitious materials. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 189, 601–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhuo, J.; Zhang, P.; Hu, S. Mesoscale synergistic effect mechanism of aggregate grading and specimen size on compressive strength of concrete with large aggregate size. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 367, 130346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bong, S.H.; Xia, M.; Nematollahi, B.; Shi, C. Ambient temperature cured ‘just-add-water’ geopolymer for 3D concrete printing applications. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2021, 121, 104060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Chen, B.; Vo, T.L.; Rezania, M. Mechanical anisotropy, rheology and carbon footprint of 3D printable concrete: A review. J. Build. Eng. 2023, 76, 107309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Wang, B.; Bai, G.; Ma, G. Study on anisotropic mechanical properties of 3D Printed concrete. Exp. Mech. 2020, 35, 243–250. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, S.; Li, W.; Cai, Y.; Zhang, K. Effects of carbonated recycled sand on the interfacial bonding performance of 3D Printed cement-based material. J. Build. Eng. 2025, 99, 111551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, Q.-L.; Yu, K.-K.; Long, W.-J.; Zheng, S.-Y.; Geng, S.-Y.; Feng, G.-L.; Wang, H.-L.; Qiu, Z.-H. Influence of different types of superabsorbent polymers on fresh mechanical properties and interlayer adhesion of 3D Printed concrete. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2024, 21, e03517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Jiang, H.; Li, Z.; Ma, G. Mechanical behaviors of 3D Printed lightweight concrete structure with hollow section. Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 2020, 20, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, G.; Yang, Y.; Wu, M.; Pang, B. Fresh properties of a novel 3D printing concrete ink. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 174, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Quartz Sand | P·O42.5 | Ferro Nickel | GGBFS | Silica Fume | Water | Water Reducer | Cellulose Ether | Attapulgite Clay | RDP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1500 g | 600 g | 150 g | 150 g | 100 g | 352 g | 0.14% | 0.15% | 0.3% | 0.08% |
Group | 6–10 Mesh (1.65–3.35 mm) | 10–20 Mesh (0.83–1.65 mm) | 20–40 Mesh (0.35–0.83 mm) | 40–80 Mesh (0.2–0.35 mm) | Average Diameter (mm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SD-1 | 0 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 0.39–0.80 |
SD-2 | 0 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 0.48–0.97 |
SD-3 | 0 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 0.51–1.06 |
SD-4 | 20% | 30% | 30% | 20% | 0.72–1.48 |
SD-5 | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 0.94–1.91 |
Group | Extruded Quality (g) | Width-10 mm (mm) | Width-20 mm (mm) | Strips (10 mm) | Fluidity (mm) | Slump (mm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SD-1 | 308.6 | 9.7 | 19.3 | 10 | 169 | 58 |
SD-2 | 336.0 | 10.5 | 20.6 | 12 | 173 | 55 |
SD-3 | 367.3 | 11.4 | 21.0 | 12 | 178 | 47 |
SD-4 | 389.5 | 11.7 | 21.6 | 12 | 182 | 39 |
SD-5 | 403.6 | 12.1 | 22.5 | 12 | 190 | 32 |
Group | Compressive Strength | Flexural Strength | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10 mm | 20 mm | 10 mm | 20 mm | |||||
7-Days | 28-Days | 7-Days | 28-Days | 7-Days | 28-Days | 7-Days | 28-Days | |
SD-1 | 16.36% | 16.83% | 40.00% | 36.37% | 14.41% | 15.43% | 7.63% | 28.40% |
SD-2 | 22.31% | 21.81% | 41.94% | 36.84% | 15.32% | 8.97% | 17.74% | 12.18% |
SD-3 | 16.84% | 23.18% | 37.21% | 39.28% | 25.0% | 13.95% | 27.70% | 22.67% |
SD-4 | 18.60% | 18.83% | 42.32% | 31.36% | 27.85% | 12.50% | 29.11% | 25.00% |
SD-5 | 18.66% | 19.92% | 36.57% | 33.75% | 32.22% | 11.46% | 35.00% | 20.83% |
Nozzle Diameter | Group | Anisotropic Coefficient (Ia) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-d Compressive Strength | 28-d Compressive Strength | 7-d Flexural Strength | 28-d Flexural Strength | ||
10 mm | SD-1 | 7.40 | 6.05 | 1.06 | 0.35 |
SD-2 | 5.62 | 4.34 | 0.35 | 0.14 | |
SD-3 | 6.26 | 5.69 | 0.35 | 0.42 | |
SD-4 | 6.84 | 8.51 | 0.28 | 0.21 | |
SD-5 | 5.23 | 4.20 | 0.28 | 0.57 | |
20 mm | SD-1 | 6.58 | 2.04 | 0.49 | 0.28 |
SD-2 | 5.52 | 2.26 | 0.57 | 0.49 | |
SD-3 | 6.65 | 4.60 | 0.35 | 0.92 | |
SD-4 | 5.11 | 5.59 | 0.42 | 0.00 | |
SD-5 | 6.39 | 4.82 | 0.35 | 0.28 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wang, S.; Wang, X.; Yan, X.; Chen, S. Effects of Aggregate Size and Nozzle Diameter on Printability and Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Ferronickel Slag–GGBFS Concrete. Materials 2025, 18, 3681. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18153681
Wang S, Wang X, Yan X, Chen S. Effects of Aggregate Size and Nozzle Diameter on Printability and Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Ferronickel Slag–GGBFS Concrete. Materials. 2025; 18(15):3681. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18153681
Chicago/Turabian StyleWang, Suguo, Xing Wang, Xueyuan Yan, and Shanghong Chen. 2025. "Effects of Aggregate Size and Nozzle Diameter on Printability and Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Ferronickel Slag–GGBFS Concrete" Materials 18, no. 15: 3681. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18153681
APA StyleWang, S., Wang, X., Yan, X., & Chen, S. (2025). Effects of Aggregate Size and Nozzle Diameter on Printability and Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Ferronickel Slag–GGBFS Concrete. Materials, 18(15), 3681. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18153681