Next Article in Journal
Study of the Influence of Gas Tungsten Arc (GTA) Welding on the Microstructure and Properties of Mg–Al–RE-Type Magnesium Alloys
Previous Article in Journal
A Modified Fatigue Life Prediction Model for Cyclic Hardening/Softening Steel
Previous Article in Special Issue
Optimizing the Thermal Treatment of Mining-Waste-Amended Clays for Ceramic Aggregates in Pavement Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mechanistic Insights into Full Solid-Waste Activators for Enhancing the Performance of Blast Furnace Slag–Fly Ash Cementitious Composites

1
Gansu Provincial Highway Development Group Co., Ltd., Lanzhou 730030, China
2
Gansu Provincial Transportation Planning Survey & Design Institute Co., Ltd., Lanzhou 730030, China
3
School of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2025, 18(14), 3275; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18143275
Submission received: 23 May 2025 / Revised: 3 July 2025 / Accepted: 9 July 2025 / Published: 11 July 2025

Abstract

To address the practical limitations of conventional alkaline activators (e.g., handling hazards, cost) and promote the resource utilization of industrial solid wastes, this study developed a novel all-solid-waste activator system comprising soda residue (SR) and carbide slag (CS). The synergistic effects of SR-CS activators on the hydration behavior of blast furnace slag (GGBS)–fly ash (FA) cementitious composites were systematically investigated. Mechanical performance, phase evolution, and microstructural development were analyzed through compressive strength tests, XRD, FTIR, TG-DTG, and SEM-EDS. Results demonstrate that in the SR-CS activator system, which combines with desulfuriation gypsum as sulfate activator, increasing CS content elevates the normal consistency water demand due to the high-polarity, low-solubility Ca(OH)2 in CS. The SR-CS activator accelerates the early hydration process of cementitious materials, shortening the paste setting time while achieving compressive strengths of 17 MPa at 7 days and 32.4 MPa at 28 days, respectively. Higher fly ash content reduced strength owing to increased unreacted particles and prolonged setting. Conversely, desulfurization gypsum exhibited a sulfate activation effect, with compressive strength peaking at 34.2 MPa with 4 wt% gypsum. Chloride immobilization by C-S-H gel was confirmed, effectively mitigating environmental risks associated with SR. This work establishes a sustainable pathway for developing low-carbon cementitious materials using multi-source solid wastes.

1. Introduction

The rapid industrialization in China from the mid-20th century to the present has generated substantial industrial solid wastes, primarily comprising ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) from steel plants and fly ash (FA) from thermal power plants. Recent statistics reveal an annual production of approximately 3.7 billion tons of industrial solid waste, with a comprehensive utilization rate of merely 55% and accumulated stockpiles exceeding 60 billion tons [1]. Conventional disposal methods, such as landfilling and roadbed backfilling, not only result in resource wastage and economic burdens for enterprises but also pose significant environmental risks. Meanwhile, as the necessity for human society, cement production accounts for 7–8% of global CO2 emissions from human behaviors [2]. This has caused problems like global warming and glacier melting. Fortunately, most industrial solid wastes, predominantly composed of Si, O, and Al elements, exhibit potential hydration activity or geopolymerization capabilities under aqueous conditions. These materials can serve as cementitious alternatives to traditional Portland cement without requiring energy-intensive “two-step grinding and one-step calcination” processes [3], presenting crucial implications for achieving carbon neutrality and sustainable development.
Extensive research has been conducted on alkali-activated binders (AABs) in recent years. Korniejenko, K. et al. [4] reviewed the global literature on geopolymer production from industrial solid wastes for circular economy objectives, revealing that the role of industrial solid wastes in the construction materials sector is increasing, as they constitute valuable sources for geopolymer synthesis. The development of sustainable materials enables post-service life reuse, thereby introducing closed-loop processes into production systems—a critical pathway toward achieving circular economies. Xie et al. [5] systematically investigated red mud–fly ash binary geopolymer materials using sodium silicate and NaOH as activators, revealing optimal workability, stability, and compressive strength at an activator modulus of 3.0. Liu et al. [6] developed a ternary geopolymer system (FA–slag–carbide slag = 32:15:3), achieving 77.83 MPa compressive strength at 28 days through optimized parameters (solid–liquid ratio 0.55, activator modulus 1.2), with microstructural characterization via MIP and SEM. Cai et al. [7] compared the durability of ultra-high-strength alkali-activated concrete (AAB-UHSC) with conventional counterparts, demonstrating superior chloride resistance but relatively weaker carbonation resistance compared to OPC-UHSC, while noting sixfold enhanced carbonation resistance versus AAB-NSC. Xia et al. [8] formulated high-performance AABs (>70 MPa) using desert sand and high-calcium FA, identifying optimal parameters (alkali content 5–8%, sodium silicate modulus 1.0–1.5) and attributing strength development to C(N)-A-S-H gel formation.
Current research predominantly employs strong alkaline solutions (NaOH/sodium silicate) as activators, which present limitations for road engineering applications requiring “dry-mix transportation and on-site mixing.” Moreover, these chemical activators incur high costs. Recent investigations have explored alkaline solid wastes as alternative activators, including carbide slag [9,10,11,12] and red mud [13,14]. In Qinghai Province, substantial quantities of soda residue (SR, pH > 13) from sodium carbonate production (Figure 1a) and carbide slag (CS, Ca(OH)2-dominated, pH > 13, Figure 1b) from acetylene manufacturing accumulate, creating significant environmental and economic pressures.
This study innovatively develops a multi-component solid-waste-based activator system using GGBS and FA as precursors, supplemented with SR (alkaline activator) and desulfurization gypsum (sulfate activator). Compared to traditional alkali activators, this study eliminates chemical reagents by utilizing industrial solid wastes for both precursor materials and activators in the cementitious system. This novel approach offers simplified production processes, cost-effectiveness, and a low carbon footprint. In the study, we systematically investigate the synergistic effects of various activator combinations on the mechanical properties of the GGBS-FA binary system. Advanced characterization techniques, including XRD, SEM-EDS, FTIR, and TG-DSC, are employed to elucidate the activation mechanisms and hydration products formation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Raw Materials

The chemical compositions of raw materials are presented in Table 1. The desulfurization gypsum (gypsum) and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) were supplied by Lanxin Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. (Lanzhou, China), while fly ash (FA) was obtained from Lanzhou Hongyuan Building Materials Co., Ltd. (Lanzhou, China). Carbide slag (CS) and soda residue (SR) were provided by Qinghai Salt Lake Magnesium Industry Co., Ltd. (Golmud, China). The SR was initially in a wet state with 65% moisture content, exhibiting a milky-white appearance. After natural drying, the pH value was measured at 11 using the ion-selective electrode method. All other materials (CS, gypsum, GGBS, and FA) were supplied in dry form. The GGBS demonstrates a density of 2.9 g/cm3 and a specific surface area of 424 m2/g, with 17.5% residue on a 45 μm sieve for FA.
Based on the chemical composition of the GGBS in Table 1, the basicity coefficient (Mo) and quality coefficient (K) were calculated using Equations (1) and (2), yielding MO = 0.86 (confirming the alkaline nature of the slag) and K = 1.87, which complies with GB/T 18046-2017 “Ground granulated blast furnace slag for cement, mortar, and concrete” [15]. Activity index validation per this standard demonstrated a 7-day activity index of 70.2% and a 28-day index of 96%, qualifying the material as S95-grade slag powder with high reactivity.
M O = CaO + MgO SiO 2 + Al 2 O 3
K = CaO + MgO + Al 2 O 3 TiO 2 + SiO 2 + MnO
X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis (Figure 2) revealed distinct phase characteristics:
  • GGBS (Figure 2a) displayed a broad hump between 20 and 40° 2θ, indicating predominant amorphous glass phases with high reactivity.
  • FA (Figure 2b) contained crystalline quartz (SiO2) and mullite (3Al2O3·2SiO2) with secondary phases of anhydrite (CaSO4), accompanied by reactive glassy phases.
  • SR (Figure 2c) primarily consisted of Calcite (CaCO3), Common salt (NaCl), and Calcium chloride (CaClOH) phases formed through complex precipitation processes involving Ca2+, Cl, CO32−, and Na+ ions.
  • CS showed a dominant Ca(OH)2 phase (91.66% CaO content).
  • Gypsum was identified as dihydrate calcium sulfate (CaSO4·2H2O).
Particle size distribution analysis using a Shimadzu SALD-2300 laser particle size analyzer (Shimadzu, Shanghai, China) (Figure 3) demonstrated the following:
  • GGBS: median diameter (D50) = 5.40 μm, mean diameter = 4.91 μm, mode diameter = 19.02 μm, SD = 0.49;
  • FA: D50 = 13.74 μm, mean diameter = 12.89 μm, mode diameter = 19.02 μm, SD = 0.59.

2.2. Mix Proportion Design

Previous studies have established optimal dosage ranges of 4–13 wt% for carbide slag (CS) and 15–30 wt% for soda residue (SR) as activators. This investigation develops a compound activator system (SR:CS = 3:7 by mass ratio) through a three-phase experimental design:
(1).
Phase I—Activator optimization:
  • Baseline groups (BG-series) with GGBS as sole precursor;
  • CS: 4/8/12 wt%;
  • SR: 26/22/18 wt%;
  • Constant GGBS content: 70 wt%.
(2).
Phase II—Binary precursor system:
  • Optimal activator combination with FA substitution (10/20/30 wt%, OG-series).
(3).
Phase III—Sulfate activation:
  • Gypsum substitution (4–10 wt%, SOG-series) in FA-containing system

2.3. Specimen Preparation

(1).
Precisely weigh constituents according to Table 2 proportions.
(2).
Sequentially add materials to the pre-wetted mortar mixer:
  • Initial low-speed mixing (140 ± 5 rpm): 30 s binder–water blending;
  • Standard sand incorporation during the second 30 s of low-speed mixing;
  • High-speed mixing (285 ± 10 rpm): 30 s + 60 s after 90 s rest period.
(3).
Cast 40 × 40 × 160 mm prism specimens using two-layer placement.
(4).
Compact each layer with 60 vibrations on the standard jolting table.
(5).
Cure under controlled conditions (20 ± 2 °C, 95% RH) for 24 h prior to demolding.

2.4. Testing Protocols

  • Strength development: Measure 3/7/28-day compressive strength per GB/T 17671 (ISO 679) [16];
  • Phase analysis: Rigaku D/max-A XRD (Tokyo, Japan) (Cu-Kα, 40 kV/40 mA, 5–85° 2θ, 2°/min);
  • Thermal analysis: Shimadzu DTG-60 AH (Shanghai, China) (N2, 50 mL/min, 10 °C/min to 900 °C);
  • Molecular characterization: Nicolet iS5 FTIR (Beijing, China) (400–4000 cm−1, KBr pellet);
  • Microstructural observation: ZEISS Sigma300 SEM (Jena, Germany) (90 s Au-sputtered samples).

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 31). The compressive strength and bending strength results obtained at 7 days and 28 days of curing are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), with each data point representing the mean of measurements from n = 11 independent specimens per age. The normality of the data distribution within each age group was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test (α = 0.05), and the homogeneity of variances between the two age groups was evaluated using Levene’s test (α = 0.05). An independent samples t-test was used to determine if there was a statistically significant difference in mean strength between the 7-day and 28-day curing periods; a probability (p) value of less than 0.05 (p < 0.05) was considered statistically significant. The error bars depicted in the bar charts represent the standard deviation (SD).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. The Influence of Multi-Source Solid-Waste Activation on the Standard Consistency Water Demand and Setting Time of the GGBS-FA System

Figure 4 illustrates the influence of multi-source solid-waste activation on the standard consistency water demand of cementitious material systems. In the BG system, as the CS content increases, the standard consistency water demand of the paste rises from 24% to 26.2%. This occurs because CS primarily consists of highly polar and low-solubility Ca(OH)2, whose loose and porous microstructure results in a large specific surface area. Compared to SR, CS requires more water to wet particle surfaces and fill pores. In the OG system, with increasing FA substitution for GGBS, the standard consistency water demand of the paste increases from 26.2% to 28.8%. This is mainly attributed to FA’s porous or hollow particle morphology and higher specific surface area, which demand additional water for surface wetting and pore filling. In contrast, GGBS effectively combines free water and optimizes paste fluidity through its dense particle structure. In the SOG system, as gypsum replaces GGBS, the standard consistency water demand decreases from 28.8% to 24.4%. This reduction stems from gypsum’s composition, dominated by soluble calcium sulfate, whose dense particle morphology and ion dissolution release effectively reduce paste viscosity while diminishing free water requirements.
Figure 5 illustrates the influence of multi-source solid-waste activation on the setting time of cementitious material systems. In the BG system, the initial setting time of the paste first decreases and then increases, with BG-2 exhibiting the shortest initial setting time of 103 min. This is attributed to the optimal activation ratio achieved between CS and SR in the paste, which promotes hydration. In the OG system, as the FA substitution for GGBS increases, the setting time gradually lengthens, with OG-3 showing the longest initial setting time of 147 min. This occurs because the hydration activity of FA is significantly lower than that of GGBS, slowing the hydration process and prolonging the setting time. In the SOG system, the setting time first decreases and then increases with the substitution of gypsum for GGBS. At low substitution levels, gypsum provides a “sulfate activation” effect, accelerating hydration and shortening the setting time. However, as the substitution amount increases, excessive gypsum fails to participate in hydration reactions during the early stages, leading to an extended setting time.

3.2. Effects of Multi-Source Solid-Waste Activation on Mechanical Properties of Slag–Fly Ash System

Figure 6 and Figure 7 present the 7-day and 28-day compressive and flexural strengths of cement mortar under different mix proportions. The strength test results demonstrate that when the total content of alkali residue and carbide slag reaches 30 wt%, their activation effect on slag becomes feasible. As carbide slag replaces alkali residue in 4% wt increments, the mortar strength initially increases, then decreases. The optimal alkali residue content is 22 wt% with 8 wt% carbide slag, achieving a 28-day compressive strength of 30.4 MPa. This occurs because the alkaline environment created by alkali residue and carbide slag facilitates the “depolymerization” reaction of slag, promoting the formation of C-S-H and C-A-S-H gels during hydration, thereby enhancing strength development [17]. Increased carbide slag content introduces substantial Ca2+ and OH ions, establishing a strong alkaline environment and supplementing calcium ions to accelerate nucleation of C-S-H and C-A-S-H gels. Simultaneously, the supplemented Ca2+ promotes the formation of ettringite (AFt) from aluminosilicate phases in slag [18]. However, when carbide slag content increases from 8 wt% to 12 wt%, the 28-day mortar strength decreases from 30.4 MPa to 25.3 MPa due to Ca(OH)2 solution saturation and subsequent crystal formation that impedes strength development [19].
Under optimal alkali residue and carbide slag proportions, when fly ash replaces slag in 10 wt% increments, both 7-day and 28-day strengths progressively decrease. At 30 wt% fly ash content, 7-day compressive strength decreases by 43% and 28-day strength by 30.9%. This reduction occurs because fly ash exhibits significantly lower hydration activity than slag powder under ambient conditions, slowing the hydration rate of the system [20,21].
In five SOG system test groups using desulfurization gypsum to replace slag powder in 2 wt% increments, strength tests reveal initial strength enhancement followed by reduction with increasing gypsum content. The maximum strength occurs at 4 wt% desulfurization gypsum content, yielding 17 MPa 7-day compressive strength and 34.2 MPa 28-day strength. Appropriate gypsum addition supplements Ca2+ and SO42− ions in the alkaline environment created by alkali residue and carbide slag, promoting AFt formation during slag–fly ash hydration. The interlocking needle-shaped AFt crystals form a reinforcing framework. However, excessive gypsum content induces expansion stress from unreacted gypsum during early hydration, increasing mortar porosity and reducing strength [22].

3.3. XRD Analysis

To ensure the relevance and comprehensiveness of this study, samples for microscopic analysis were selected to encompass the influence of the activator on three distinct cementitious material systems: GGBS alone, GGBS-FA, and GGBS-FA–gypsum. Furthermore, within each of these three systems, the specimen exhibiting optimal mechanical performance at both the 7-day and 28-day curing ages (specifically BG-2, OG-1, and SOG-2, respectively) was chosen for microscopic analysis.
To characterize the types of hydration products formed with different precursors and activators, XRD analysis was conducted on three groups of samples (BG-2, OG-1, and SOG-2) after 28 days of hydration, with results shown in Figure 8. The main crystalline phases identified in the three groups of samples after 28 days of hydration include Friedel’s salt (3CaO·Al2O3·CaCl2·10H2O, FS), calcite (CaCO3), quartz (SiO2), calcium aluminosilicate hydrate (C-A-S-H), calcium hydroxide, calcium silicate, and zeolite (Ca2(Si9Al3)O24·8H2O). Among these, FS, C-A-S-H, and zeolite are primarily generated through hydration reactions. The XRD patterns exhibit a distinct “hump” region between 20 and 40°, attributed to the formation of amorphous C-S-H gel during hydration [23]. A diffraction peak of C-A-S-H is observed near 31°, where Al3+ ions dissolved from Al2O3 in the precursor are incorporated into the C-S-H gel during hydration to form C-A-S-H [24]. Simultaneously, the Si-O and Al-O tetrahedra in slag powder and fly ash undergo “depolymerization-polycondensation” reactions in the alkaline environment created by alkali residue and carbide slag dissolution, producing zeolite-type minerals (Ca2(Si9Al3)O24·8H2O) [25].
Calcite mainly originates from alkali residue, quartz from unreacted slag powder and fly ash, and calcium hydroxide from carbide slag. The diffraction peak intensity of the quartz phase in OG-1 is significantly higher than that in BG-2 and SOG-2, with BG-2 showing the lowest intensity. This is attributed to the replacement of 10 wt% slag powder with fly ash in OG-1. Given the substantially lower cementitious activity of fly ash compared to slag powder, the unreacted quartz content in OG-1 exceeds that in BG-2 under equivalent alkali residue and carbide slag conditions. In SOG-2, the addition of 4 wt% desulfurization gypsum introduces Ca2+ and SO42− ions, creating a “sulfate activation” effect that enhances precursor hydration. Consequently, SOG-2 exhibits reduced quartz phase diffraction peaks compared to OG-1 [21].

3.4. FTIR Analysis

The FTIR analysis results of 28-day hydration products for BG-2, OG-1, and SOG-2 are shown in Figure 9. Absorption bands near 530 cm−1, 801 cm−1, and 974 cm−1 correspond to stretching and bending vibrations of Si-O bonds, characteristic of C-S-H gel. SOG-2 exhibits the broadest and most intense absorption peaks at these positions, followed by BG-2, with OG-1 showing the weakest signals. This indicates that SOG-2 generates the highest amount of C-S-H gel after 28 days of hydration, consistent with its superior 28-day compressive strength results [26].
The absorption band near 1416 cm−1 arises from C-O bond stretching vibrations, confirming the presence of calcite [27]. Absorption bands at 1642 cm−1 and 3410 cm−1 are attributed to asymmetric stretching vibrations of O-H bonds, reflecting internal vibrations of crystalline water primarily originating from C-S-H gel and Friedel’s salt (FS) [26]. SOG-2 demonstrates the strongest intensity and broadest peaks for these features, followed by BG-2, while OG-1 shows the weakest signals. These observations suggest that SOG-2 contains the highest proportion of hydration products with crystalline water, aligning with its enhanced 28-day compressive performance compared to the other two groups.

3.5. TG-DTG Analysis

TG-DTG analysis was conducted on 28-day hydrated samples of BG-2, OG-1, and SOG-2, with results shown in Figure 10. The DTG curves exhibit four primary weight loss peaks corresponding to the decomposition and dehydration of hydration products.
The weight loss peak in the 50–200 °C range primarily arises from the decomposition of C-S-H and C-A-S-H gels [28]. Within this temperature range, these gels undergo thermal decomposition and dehydration, leading to significant weight loss in the TG curves and corresponding peaks in the DTG curves. As shown in Figure 10, the DTG peak area in the 50–200 °C range follows the order SOG-2 > BG-2 > OG-1, indicating that SOG-2 produces the highest quantity of C-S-H and C-A-S-H gels during hydration, followed by BG-2 and then OG-1. This observation aligns with the 28-day compressive strength test results of the three groups.
The weight loss peak in the 300–400 °C range is attributed to the dehydration of Friedel’s salt (FS) [29]. Thermal dehydration of FS within this temperature range generates distinct DTG peaks, with peak areas following SOG-2 > BG-2 > OG-1, suggesting that FS formation during 28-day hydration follows the same order. These findings are consistent with XRD and FTIR results. The weight loss peak in the 450–550 °C range corresponds to the decomposition of Ca(OH)2 [10], primarily originating from unreacted calcium hydroxide in carbide slag, indicating incomplete consumption of Ca(OH)2 during hydration. The peak in the 600–750 °C range results from calcite decomposition [21], predominantly derived from alkali residue in raw materials, with a minor portion formed through carbonation of Ca(OH)2 during late hydration. Comparative analysis reveals that SOG-2 and BG-2 exhibit higher hydration degrees, resulting in less carbonation-induced calcite formation in SOG-2 [30].
In summary, the TG-DTG results demonstrate full consistency with XRD and FTIR experimental findings.

3.6. SEM-EDS Analysis

To further clarify the hydration products of cementitious materials under different mixing ratios and analyze the influence of these ratios on their microstructure, SEM-EDS analysis was conducted on 28-day hydration products of three groups of samples (BG-2, OG-1, and SOG-2), as shown in Figure 11. The SEM-EDS results indicate that the primary hydration products of all three groups at 28 days are C-S-H gel. Among them, BG-2 exhibits the highest content of C-S-H gel, with a dense and uniformly distributed structure. Additionally, lamellar FS crystals are observed in BG-2, exhibiting a nested distribution within the C-S-H gel. This nested configuration constitutes a critical component of the cementitious strength [31], demonstrating that the optimal dosages of alkali residue and calcium carbide residue play a pivotal role in promoting the hydration of slag powder.
Compared to BG-2, the C-S-H gel structure in OG-1 appears looser, with significantly reduced gel content, thereby impeding strength development. SEM images reveal the presence of spherical and columnar phases. EDS analysis identifies the spherical particles as unhydrated fly ash, while the columnar phase corresponds to stilbite [29], consistent with XRD results.
In SOG-2, the hydration products primarily consist of C-S-H gel, FS crystals, and unhydrated fly ash particles. SEM images clearly show a denser C-S-H structure and increased FS content, attributed to the “sulfate activation” effect induced by the addition of desulfurization gypsum, which enhances sample strength. EDS results from Spot2 and Spot3 detect the presence of Mg, Al, and Cl elements, indicating partial substitution of Si4+ by Al3+ and Mg2+ in the C-S-H gel, along with Cl immobilization. Similar substitution patterns (partial replacement of Al3+ by Mg2+ and Si4+ in FS) are also observed in Spot1 and Spot7 [32].
In this study, we explore the possibility of all-solid-waste alkaline activator and systematically analyze the hydration products and microstructures of the cementitious composites. However, more work is needed to replenish. For example, TEM technique can be used to further investigate the generation of hydration products in the cementitious composite prepared in our study [33]; NMR can be quote to observe the molecular structural development of C-S-H [34,35]; MIP test can be invited to figure out the pore development in our cementitious composites [36,37]. Meanwhile, it is recognized that the high shrinkage associated with alkali-activated slag cementitious materials with high slag content is a major limitation for their practical application [38,39]. The incorporation of gypsum compensates for this slag hydration-induced shrinkage through the formation of AFt. However, excessive AFt formation or delayed AFt formation can lead to expansion and cracking. Therefore, further investigation into the gypsum content and ettringite formation in alkali-activated slag–gypsum cementitious systems is warranted [40,41,42,43].

4. Conclusions

This study investigated the effects of alkali residue–calcium carbide residue on the slag powder–fly ash precursor system through compressive strength analysis and microstructural characterization of hydration products. The following conclusions were drawn:
(1)
When the alkali residue and calcium carbide residue contents reached 22 wt% and 8 wt%, respectively, the highest activation efficiency for slag powder was achieved. The compressive strength reached 15.1 MPa at 7 days and 30.4 MPa at 28 days. Substituting 10 wt% slag powder with fly ash resulted in reduced compressive strength at both curing ages (7 d and 28 d). This decline is attributed to the significantly lower hydration activity of fly ash under ambient conditions compared to slag powder, which decelerates the overall hydration kinetics of the system.
(2)
Replacing slag powder with desulfurization gypsum at 2 wt% increments initially increased then decreased compressive strength. The maximum strength (17 MPa at 7 d and 34.2 MPa at 28 d) occurred at 4 wt% desulfurization gypsum content. This enhancement stems from the dissolution of gypsum, which releases Ca2+ and SO42− ions, inducing a “sulfate activation” effect that accelerates hydration reactions in the precursor system.
(3)
XRD, FTIR, TG-DTG, and SEM-EDS analyses confirmed that the 28-day hydration products of BG-2, OG-1, and SOG-2 samples primarily consisted of FS, C-(A)-S-H gel, and zeolites. The quantities of FS and C-(A)-S-H gel followed the following order: SOG-2 > BG-2 > OG-1. Alkali residue and calcium carbide residue provided the necessary alkaline environment to promote slag hydration. Fly ash substitution (10 wt%) reduced hydration products due to its slower reaction kinetics, while subsequent 4 wt% desulfurization gypsum addition enhanced sulfate activation, increasing hydration product formation.
(4)
The results demonstrate the feasibility of using a fully solid-waste composite activator (alkali residue–calcium carbide residue–desulfurization gypsum) to replace conventional strong alkali chemicals for activating slag powder–fly ash systems. This approach enables the development of low-carbon cementitious materials based entirely on solid wastes, offering significant potential for advancing green building materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.Z., Y.L., and D.W.; methodology, H.Z., X.W., and Y.W.; validation, Y.L. and Y.W.; formal analysis, H.Z., Y.L., and X.W.; investigation, H.Z., Y.L., D.W., X.W., and Y.W.; writing—original draft preparation, H.Z.; writing—review and editing, H.Z., Y.L., D.W., X.W., and Y.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the Science and Technology Project of Gansu Provincial Department of Transportation (2024-49) and National Key R&D Program of China (2024YFB2605101).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Huiying Zhang was employed by the company Gansu Provincial Highway Development Group Co., Ltd. Authors Yongchun Li, Dingbang Wei, Xu Wu and Yapeng Wang were employed by the company Gansu Provincial Transportation Planning Survey & Design Institute Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Liu, X. Analysis of the current situation and progress of comprehensive utilization of industrial solid waste in China. Resour. Sav. Environ. Protection. 2021, 2, 95–96. [Google Scholar]
  2. Wang, D.; Xu, D.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, J. The Evolution and Prospects of Cement-Based Cementitious Materials. J. Build. Mater. 2025, 1–12. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  3. Ahmad, M.R.; Qian, L.P.; Fang, Y.; Wang, A.; Dai, J.G. A multiscale study on gel composition of hybrid alkali-activated materials partially utilizing air pollution control residue as an activator. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2023, 136, 104856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Korniejenko, K.; Mikuła, J.; Brudny, K.; Aruova, L.; Zhakanov, A.; Jexembayeva, A.; Zhaksylykova, L. A Review of Industrial By-Product Utilization and Future Pathways of Circular Economy: Geopolymers as Modern Materials for Sustainable Building. Sustainability 2025, 17, 4536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Xie, B. Characterization of Geopolymer Bi-Liquid Slurry Materials in Alkali-Excited Red Mud-Fly Ash Binary System; East China University of Science and Technology: Shanghai, China, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  6. Liu, Y.; Chen, X.; Wang, B.; Lu, N.; Xiao, X.; Luo, D. Preparation and strength mechanism of alkali-excited fly ash-slag-electrolytic slag-based aggregates. Bull. Chin. Ceram. Soc. 2023, 42, 1353. [Google Scholar]
  7. Cai, R.; Tian, Z.; Ye, H. Durability characteristics and quantification of ultra-high strength alkali-activated concrete. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2022, 134, 104743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Xia, D.; Chen, R.; Cheng, J.; Tang, Y.; Xiao, Z.; Li, Z. Desert sand-high calcium fly ash-based alkali-activated mortar: Flowability, mechanical properties, and microscopic analysis. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 398, 131729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. An, S.; Wang, B.; Cheng, W.; Zhao, Q. Mechanism of action of calcium carbide slag to stimulate slag-fly ash composite cementitious materials. Silic. Bull. 2023, 42, 1333–1343. [Google Scholar]
  10. Gao, Y.; Meng, H.; Wan, H.; Hu, X.; Chen, C. Properties and microstructure of calcium carbide slag alkali-inspired slag/fly ash cementitious materials. J. Cent. South Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2023, 54, 1739–1747. [Google Scholar]
  11. Luo, X.; Zhang, S.; Guo, R.; Jia, J.; Ma, F.; Kong, C. Effect of replacement of cement by calcium carbide slag as an alkali exciter on the properties and microstructure of cementitious materials made of persulfurized phosphorus gypsum. Mater. Herald 2023, 37, 298–304. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gao, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Meng, H.; Hu, X.; Li, Z. Synergistic enhancement mechanism of calcium carbide slag-desulfurization gypsum-steel slag modified fly ash geopolymer. J. Build. Mater. 2023, 26, 870–878. [Google Scholar]
  13. Sun, L. Preparation and Hydration Mechanism of Polymerized Materials from Aged Bayer Red Mud Bases. Master’s Thesis, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hou, D.; Wu, D.; Wang, X.; Gao, S.; Yu, R.; Li, M.; Wang, P.; Wang, Y. Sustainable use of red mud in ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC): Design and performance evaluation. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2021, 115, 103862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. GB/T 18046-2017; Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag Used for Cement and Concrete. China Standards Press: Beijing, China, 2017.
  16. GB/T 17671-2021; Test Method of Cement Mortar Strength (ISO Method). China Standards Press: Beijing, China, 2021.
  17. Lv, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Peng, Z.; Wang, D. Study of the properties of red mud-based foamed geopolymers. Silic. Bull. 2023, 42, 3624–3632. [Google Scholar]
  18. You, H. Experimental Study on the Durability of Gravel Stabilized by Red Mud-Based Cementitious Materials. Master’s Thesis, Shandong University, Jinan, China, 2023. (In Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  19. Guo, Q.; Du, L.; Hua, L.; Gao, M.; Liu, R.; Ai, G. Performance study of alkali-excited slag-steel slag composite cementitious system. New Build. Mater. 2024, 51, 108–113. [Google Scholar]
  20. Yang, J.; Zeng, J.; He, X.; Zhang, Y.; Su, Y.; Tan, H. Sustainable clinker-free solid waste binder produced from wet-ground granulated blast-furnace slag, phosphogypsum and carbide slag. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 330, 127218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, W.; Yi, Y. Use of carbide slag from acetylene industry for activation of ground granulated blast-furnace slag. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 238, 117713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhuang, X.Y.; Chen, L.; Komarneni, S.; Zhou, C.H.; Tong, D.S.; Yang, H.M.; Yu, W.H.; Wang, H. Fly ash-based geopolymer: Clean production, properties and applications. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 125, 253–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Li, X. Study on the Effect of Activated MgO on the Hydration and Compensation of Drying Shrinkage Properties of Alkali-stimulated Fly Ash-Slag. Master’s Thesis, Hebei University, Wuhan, China, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  24. Gao, Y.; Meng, H.; Leng, Z.; Pu, T.; Long, G.; Duan, K. Properties and microstructure of calcium carbide slag-desulfurization gypsum composite excitation filling material. J. Civ. Environ. Eng. 2023, 45, 99–106, (In English and Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  25. Guo, W.; Wang, S.; Xu, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, C.; Bai, Y.; Zhao, Q. Mechanical performance and microstructure improvement of soda residue–carbide slag–ground granulated blast furnace slag binder by optimizing its preparation process and curing method. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 302, 124403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Guo, W.; Zhang, Z.; Bai, Y.; Zhao, G.; Sang, Z.; Zhao, Q. Development and characterization of a new multi-strength level binder system using soda residue-carbide slag as composite activator. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 291, 123367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kumar, S.; Maradani, L.S.R.; Mohapatra, A.K.; Pradhan, B. Effect of mix parameters on chloride content, sulfate ion concentration, and microstructure of geopolymer concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024, 435, 136864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lodeiro, I.; Macphee, D.E.; Palomo, A.; Fernández-Jiménez, A. Effect of alkalis on fresh C–S–H gels. FTIR analysis. Cem. Concr. Res. 2009, 39, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xu, D.; Ni, W.; Wang, Q.; Xu, C.; Jiang, Y. Preparation of clinker-free concrete with alkali slag composite cementitious materials. J. Harbin Inst. Technol. 2020, 52, 151–160. [Google Scholar]
  30. Wang, Q.; Li, J.; Yao, G.; Zhu, X.; Hu, S.; Qiu, J.; Chen, P.; Lyu, X. Characterization of the mechanical properties and microcosmic mechanism of Portland cement prepared with soda residue. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 241, 117994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Abdalqader, A.F.; Jin, F.; Al-Tabbaa, A. Characterisation of reactive magnesia and sodium carbonate-activated fly ash/slag paste blends. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 93, 506–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhao, G. Durability and Micro-Mechanism of Alkali Slag-Electric Slag-Inspired Mineral Powder-Fly Ash Cementitious Material System. Master’s Thesis, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, China, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  33. Wei, E. Preparation and Transformation Mechanism of Zeolite (NaA/NaX/SOD) Microspheres with Different Geopolymerization and Their Adsorption Properties on Pb2+. Master’s Thesis, Guangxi University, Nanning, China, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  34. Liu, X.; Zhang, N.; Yao, Y.; Sun, H.; Feng, H. Micro-structural characterization of the hydration products of bauxite-calcination-method red mud-coal gangue based cementitious materials. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013, 262, 428–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Emminger, H.Y.; Ladner, L.; Agudo, R.C. Comparative study of the early stages of crystallization of calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) and calcium aluminate silicate hydrate (C-A-S-H). Cem. Concr. Res. 2025, 193, 107873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ye, K.; Dasari, A.; Hooper, T.J.N. Structural characterization and fire performance of geopolymer-glass fiber composite panels. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 400, 132633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wu, H.; Shen, A.; Zhang, J. Quasi-static and dynamic mechanical properties of concrete containing cellulose fiber: Mechanism and effects. Constr. Build. Mater. 2025, 483, 141701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, Z.; Chen, Y.; Provis, J.L.; Cizer, Ö.; Ye, G. Autogenous shrinkage of alkali-activated slag: A critical review. Cem. Concr. Res. 2023, 172, 107244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Thomas, R.J.; Ye, H.; Radlińska, A.; Peethamparan, S. Alkali-activated slag concrete: A closer look at sustainable alternatives to portland cement. Concr. Int. 2016, 38, 33–38. [Google Scholar]
  40. Duxson, P.; Provis, J.L.; Lukey, G.C.; Van Deventer, J.S.J. The role of inorganic polymer technology in the development of ‘green concrete’. Cem. Concr. Res. 2007, 37, 1590–1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ye, H.; Radlińska, A. Shrinkage mitigation strategies in alkali-activated slag. Cem. Concr. Res. 2017, 101, 131–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Xue, L.; Ni, Z.; Zhou, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Xiong, H.; Wang, H.; Zhuge, X.; Liu, H. Effects of desulfurized gypsum on shrinkage behavior of alkali-activated slag (AAS) and hybrid alkali-activated cement (HAC). Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2025, 22, e04320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wang, T.; Wu, K.; Wu, M. Development of green binder systems based on flue gas desulfurization gypsum and fly ash incorporating slag or steel slag powders. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 265, 120275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Large piles of alkaline solid waste: (a) SR, (b) CS.
Figure 1. Large piles of alkaline solid waste: (a) SR, (b) CS.
Materials 18 03275 g001
Figure 2. XRD: (a) GGBS, (b) FA, (c) SR, (d) CS, (e) gypsum.
Figure 2. XRD: (a) GGBS, (b) FA, (c) SR, (d) CS, (e) gypsum.
Materials 18 03275 g002
Figure 3. Particle size distribution: (a) GGBS, (b) FA.
Figure 3. Particle size distribution: (a) GGBS, (b) FA.
Materials 18 03275 g003
Figure 4. Influence of multi-source solid-waste activation on the standard consistency water demand of the GGBS-FA system.
Figure 4. Influence of multi-source solid-waste activation on the standard consistency water demand of the GGBS-FA system.
Materials 18 03275 g004
Figure 5. Influence of multi-source solid-waste activation on the setting time of the GGBS-FA system.
Figure 5. Influence of multi-source solid-waste activation on the setting time of the GGBS-FA system.
Materials 18 03275 g005
Figure 6. Compressive strength.
Figure 6. Compressive strength.
Materials 18 03275 g006
Figure 7. Bending strength.
Figure 7. Bending strength.
Materials 18 03275 g007
Figure 8. XRD patterns of 28-day specimens.
Figure 8. XRD patterns of 28-day specimens.
Materials 18 03275 g008
Figure 9. FTIR patterns of 28-day specimens.
Figure 9. FTIR patterns of 28-day specimens.
Materials 18 03275 g009
Figure 10. TG-DTG patterns of 28-day specimens.
Figure 10. TG-DTG patterns of 28-day specimens.
Materials 18 03275 g010
Figure 11. SEM-EDS test results of 28-day specimens.
Figure 11. SEM-EDS test results of 28-day specimens.
Materials 18 03275 g011aMaterials 18 03275 g011b
Table 1. Chemical composition of raw materials.
Table 1. Chemical composition of raw materials.
MaterialCaOSiO2Al2O3Fe2O3MgOTiO2K2OSO3MnONa2OClOtherLOI
GGBS32.9631.4318.920.2210.201.310.442.550.491.090.120.040.23
FA9.5844.8228.245.391.680.981.681.740.093.300.210.381.93
SR55.8611.181.850.743.6-0.211.06-4.1818.580.152.43
CS91.625.121.990.27-0.05-0.76---0.060.11
Gypsum34.043.641.980.601.190.070.2639.370.020.250.130.0818.53
Table 2. Mix ratio.
Table 2. Mix ratio.
IDSR (wt%)CS (wt%)GGBS (wt%)FA (wt%)Gypsum (wt%)W/B
BG-126470--0.5
BG-222870--
BG-3181270--
OG-12286010
OG-22285020
OG-32285030
SOG-122858102
SOG-222856104
SOG-322854106
SOG-422852108
SOG-5228501010
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, H.; Li, Y.; Wei, D.; Wu, X.; Wang, Y. Mechanistic Insights into Full Solid-Waste Activators for Enhancing the Performance of Blast Furnace Slag–Fly Ash Cementitious Composites. Materials 2025, 18, 3275. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18143275

AMA Style

Zhang H, Li Y, Wei D, Wu X, Wang Y. Mechanistic Insights into Full Solid-Waste Activators for Enhancing the Performance of Blast Furnace Slag–Fly Ash Cementitious Composites. Materials. 2025; 18(14):3275. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18143275

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Huiying, Yongchun Li, Dingbang Wei, Xu Wu, and Yapeng Wang. 2025. "Mechanistic Insights into Full Solid-Waste Activators for Enhancing the Performance of Blast Furnace Slag–Fly Ash Cementitious Composites" Materials 18, no. 14: 3275. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18143275

APA Style

Zhang, H., Li, Y., Wei, D., Wu, X., & Wang, Y. (2025). Mechanistic Insights into Full Solid-Waste Activators for Enhancing the Performance of Blast Furnace Slag–Fly Ash Cementitious Composites. Materials, 18(14), 3275. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18143275

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop