Next Article in Journal
Phase Transformation Behavior, Mechanical Properties Under Thermal Stress, and Slag-Induced Erosion of 2–4 mol% CeO2-Doped CaO-Stabilized Zirconia
Next Article in Special Issue
Thermal Optimization of Edge-Emitting Lasers Arrays
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Different Spot Pattern Lasers on Cleaning Effect of TC4 Titanium Alloy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Improving Visible Light Photocatalysis Using Optical Defects in CoOx-TiO2 Photonic Crystals
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Lu3Al5O12:Ce3+ Fluorescent Ceramic with Deep Traps: Thermoluminescence and Photostimulable Luminescence Properties

1
Engineering Research Center of Optical Instrument and System, Ministry of Education and Shanghai Key Lab of Modern Optical System, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, No. 516 Jungong Road, Shanghai 200093, China
2
Aerospace Laser Technology and System Department, Wangzhijiang Innovation Center for Laser, Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2025, 18(1), 63; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18010063
Submission received: 23 November 2024 / Revised: 22 December 2024 / Accepted: 25 December 2024 / Published: 27 December 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Materials Physics (2nd Edition))

Abstract

:
Electron-trapping materials have attracted a lot of attention in the field of optical data storage. However, the lack of suitable trap levels has hindered its development and application in the field of optical data storage. Herein, Lu3Al5O12:Ce3+ fluorescent ceramics were developed as the optical storage medium, and high-temperature vacuum sintering induced the formation of deep traps (1.36 eV). The matrix based on the garnet-structured material ensures excellent rewritability. By analyzing the thermoluminescence and photostimulable luminescence, it is found that the transition of electrons provided by Ce3+ between the conduction band and trap levels offers the possibility for optical data storage. As evidence of its application, the optical information encoding using 254 nm light and decoding using a light stimulus and thermal stimulus were applied. These findings are expected to provide candidate material for novel optical storage technology, and further promote the development of advanced information storage technology.

1. Introduction

With the rapid development of society, the amount of global data increase exponentially. The huge amount of data puts forward challenges for information storage technology. Optical data storage (ODS) is widely used in information storage because of its outstanding performance, environmentally friendly nature, high capacity, and long lifetime [1,2,3]. However, caused by the limitation of optical diffraction resolution, the application of traditional ODS technologies is facing considerable challenges. The emergence of super-resolution recording [4] and information multiplexing technologies is expected to solve these problems [5,6,7,8,9]. To better apply the two technologies, a new optical storage medium needs to be developed.
Since Lindmayer first proposed the concept of electron-trapping materials (ETMs) in 1986 [10], they have been widely used in data storage [11,12,13], emergency display [14], and information processing [15]. ETMs, which can retain excitation energy and release it as light emission upon external thermal and optical stimulations, are also referred to as photostimulable luminescence (PSL) materials. PSL materials have great application prospects in the field of ODS due to its all-optical operation mode [16]. Some sulfide-based PSL materials have been developed in the previous period, but most of them focus on optical computing operations [17,18,19,20]; there are few studies on ODS performance, and the problems of sulfide pollution and poor thermal stability limit its applications. The emergence of ceramic phosphors solves the above problems and exhibits good ODS properties, such as rewritability and high speed of reading/writing. Some researchers have prepared organic–inorganic composite fluorescent films. Zhuang et al. proposed two PSL materials (Sr1-xBax)Si2O2N2:Eu/Yb, Dy and NaMgF3:Tb that can complete the writing and reading of information by 405 nm and 980 nm laser/heating, which allows for information multiplexing; Deng et al. prepared Y2GeO5:Pr, Tb PSL materials that can record information in a bit by bit mode by a 515 nm laser, which demonstrated the potential of PSL materials in the field of high-density ODS [21,22,23]; Lin et al. prepared phosphor-in-glass BaSi2O5:Eu, Nd for data storage, and established the relationship between trap and PSL performance [24]. As a result of the poor stability and uniformity of these materials, they are not ideal materials for data storage. Cerium-doped lutetium aluminum garnet (Lu3Al5O12:Ce) ceramic is a promising ceramic material with excellent optical and thermal properties, good chemical stability, and high mechanical strength, which has been widely used in the fields of fluorescent materials, laser materials, and scintillation materials [25,26,27,28,29]. The above characteristics are very suitable as optical storage matrix materials.
However, the lack of appropriate depth of traps limits the application of new information storage materials. The trap levels of ETMs should be considered. Generally, the trap depth is between 1 and 1.5 eV, which can not only ensure the stable storage of information, but also be read out by near-infrared light [24,30]. Ion doping is a typical modulation method to construct traps. Xie et al. reported a series of Y3Al5-xGaxO12:Ce3+, V3+ PSL materials with a tunable trap depth (1.2–1.6 eV). According to the vacuum referred binding energy (VRBE) diagram, the effect of Ga3+ doping on the formation of deep traps was analyzed [31]. In the typical spinel-structured system, there are lots of anti-site defects of Ga3+ and Mg2+, and the doping of Bi3+/Cr3+ can induce the formation of deep traps [32,33].
In this work, Lu3Al5O12:Ce3+ PSL materials were developed by vacuum sintering technology. Its spectral properties and crystal structure were studied in detail, capable of emitting 512 nm green light, and SEM shows that the grain size distribution is between 10 and 12 μm. In particular, the origin of the trap and the mechanism of optical storage were analyzed by thermoluminescence curves. Then, its rewritability and information retention ability were tested. It also exhibited the writing/reading process of the optical information by a 254 nm light and 980 nm laser/heating.

2. Experiments

Lu3−xAl5O12:xCe (x = 0.011, 0.013 and 0.015) (abbreviated as LuAG:xCe) materials were prepared by the vacuum sintering technique. The required chemical regents include Lu2O3 (4N), Al2O3 (4N), CeO2 (4N), MgO, and TEOs. Firstly, raw materials were mixed with anhydrous alcohol according to the stoichiometric ratio and ground in a planet-type ball mill at 230 rpm for 12 h. The ball-milled mixtures were rinsed with anhydrous alcohol and dried in an oven at 80 °C for 6 h. Then, the dried samples were thoroughly ground. After grinding, the dried powders were sieved through a 200-mesh screen. Prior to sintering, the green bodies were shaped from powders under a uniaxial press of 30 MPa and were cold isostatic pressed (CIP) at 210 MPa. The obtained samples were pressed and pre-sintered at 800 °C for 6 h and high-temperature sintered at 1850 °C for 6 h; the preparation flow chart of fluorescent ceramics as shown in Figure S1.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were obtained by an X-ray diffractometer, and the test range is 2θ = 10–90° (Bruker D8 ADVANCE, Karlsruhe, Germany). The steady photoluminescence (PL) and photoluminescence excitation (PLE) were tested by a fluorescence spectrophotometer (Hitachi F-4600, Tokyo, Japan). The morphologies of the ceramics were measured using a scanning electron microscope (SEM, Verios G4 UC, Waltham, MA, USA). Thermoluminescence (TL) was tested by a TOSL-3DS meter (Guangzhou Rongfan, Guangzhou, China). Luminescence decay curves and Photostimulated luminescence (PSL) spectra were measured by a Time-resolved spectrometer (Edinburgh Instruments, FLSP-920, Livingston, UK).

3. Results and Analysis

3.1. Structure and Optical Properties

As shown in Figure 1a, we tested the XRD spectrum of the Lu3−xAl5O12:xCe (x = 0.011, 0.013 and 0.015), and the diffraction peaks are in good agreement with the standard XRD pattern of Lu3Al5O12 (NO. 73-1368); the space group is Ia–3d (NO. 230), and no obvious impurity peaks are observed. This indicates that Ce3+ is doped into the Lu3Al5O12 lattice, forming a solid solution. Different concentrations of Ce3+ doping have little effect on the lattice structure of LuAG, and the peak positions are basically consistent [29,34]. The calculated lattice parameters are a = b = c =11.8903 Å, α = β = γ = 90°. The XRD Rietveld refinement of the Lu2.987Al5O12:0.013Ce3+ is presented in Figure 1b; the reliability parameters Rwp, Rp, and χ2 were calculated at 10.73%, 8.10%, and 10.04. Almost all the peaks are well-indexed with the Lu3Al5O12 material, which indicates the results are reliable. Figure 1c presents the PLE (λem = 512 nm) and PL (λex = 437 nm) of the LuAG:xCe3+ material. The excitation spectrums have two peaks located at 350 nm and 450 nm, which matches the 4f→5d transition of Ce3+. The PL peak of LuAG:Ce3+ is located at 512 nm, which is equivalent to the transitions of 5d12F5/2 and 5d12F7/2. With the increase in the Ce3+ concentration, the PL intensity decreases first and then increases in a small range, which may be related to the difference in the crystallinity of ceramics. The SEM micrograph of the surface region of LuAG:0.013Ce3+ ceramics are displayed in Figure 1d. The samples have a dense structure, few micropores and defects, and the grain size was almost the same at 10–12 μm. From the EDS mapping in Figure S2, it can be seen that the elements of Lu, Al, O, and Ce are evenly distributed. This result confirmed that high-quality ceramics have been prepared and provides a good foundation for optical information storage.
Trap levels are closely related to the information storage properties of ETMs; they are generally analyzed by the thermoluminescence (TL) curve. TL involves the process in which storage optical energy by irradiation with light is re-emitted by heating. As an effective tool to study the trap levels, the TL curve provide lots of information about the traps. The peak position is related to the trap depth, and the peak intensity is related to the number of traps. Therefore, the TL curves of the LuAG:xCe3+ materials were measured at 1 K s−1 in Figure 2a. There are two different depths of trap (T1 and T2). Compared with the pure LuAG, the TL intensity of LuAG:0.013Ce3+ is significantly improved. The calculation of the depth is as shown in Figure 2b. The specific calculation method is shown in the following formula [35,36]:
β E k B T m 2 = s e x p ( E k B T m )
where E (eV), β (K/s), and kB are the trap depth, heating rate, and Boltzmann constant; Tm (K) is the temperature corresponding to the maximum vertical axis; and s (s−1) is the frequency factor. In Figure 2b, By plotting ln( T m 2 / β ) against 1/(kBTm), the trap depth of the TL curve can be determined from the slope of the straight line. When x = 0.013, the trap depths are 1.36 eV and 0.89 eV, respectively, which are larger than those of most typical ETMs [37]. Next, the information retention ability of the sample was tested, which was expressed as the integral area under the TL curves. As shown in Figure 2c, the TL curve of the LuAG:0.013Ce3+ materials were tested for different decay times after being irradiated by 254 nm light. With the decay time increasing, the signal intensity attenuates and gradually flattens out. After a delay for 168 h, the sample still has about 40% integrated intensity, and the stability of information storage is slightly lower than that of the YAG: Ce crystal [38]. This indicates that the sample has a relatively stable information storage capacity.
Rewritability is one of the most important properties for electron-trapping materials. Therefore, the rewritability of the LuAG:Ce material was verified. This cycle includes write-in, readout, and erasing. Firstly, UV light is used to excite the ceramic for 1 min; then, the ceramic is heated to 673 K after 30 s, and the data were recorded during heating. Finally, the sample is cooled down to room temperature. The area integral of the TL curve in each cycle is taken as the optical signal intensity, as shown in Figure 2d. Obviously, after 25 cycles, the signal intensity remains basically unchanged, and the size fluctuated around 7%, which was basically the same as the literature results [21]. This is due to the electron capture and de-trapping mechanism. In addition, it is proving that the sample has a higher physical and chemical stability than sulfide and glass phosphors [17,18,24].

3.2. Analysis of Trap and Optical Storage Principle

From the analysis of the TL glow curve, we know that there are two traps of different depths in LuAG:Ce. This may be due to the difference in the attraction of the traps to the carriers, which makes the carrier trapped in different positions around the traps. The principle of information storage is based on the optical quantum effect of the trap level on electron capture and release. Therefore, it is necessary to study the transfer process of electrons clearly. In LuAG:Ce, Ce3+ is not only the luminescence center [39], but also provides electrons; this is because Ce3+ is inclined to lose electrons and become Ce4+, due to its special external electron configuration [40,41]. These electrons are captured by traps and stored stably. This explains the significant enhancement of the TL intensity of LuAG with Ce3+ doping.
For the nature of the trap level, it is generally considered to have oxygen vacancies [42,43], and few LuAl,16a anti-site defects (ADs) [44]. Herein, the samples were prepared in a high-temperature vacuum environment, which is more likely to generate defects. To study the origin of defects, the TL intensity of the sample was tested after high-temperature annealing in air, and the TL curves are displayed in Figure 3a. Compared with the unannealed sample, the TL intensity of the sample after air annealing almost disappeared; this is because oxygen vacancies are filled by oxygen under the high-temperature and oxygen-rich atmosphere [45,46]. The above results indicate that the trap levels in the material are related to oxygen vacancies.
On the basis of the above experiments, an information storage principle of the LuAG:Ce material was proposed, as shown in Figure 3b. After the ceramic is irradiated, the electrons on the Ce3+ ground state 4f are excited to the 5d energy level and continue to the conduction band. Some activated electrons in the conduction band return to the 5d energy level and transition to the 4f ground state with 512 nm. The other electrons can transfer to the conduction band (CB) and are captured by trap levels. Electrons are released from the trap when stimulated by heating or 980 nm and transfer to the Ce3+ excited state energy level and ground state, resulting in the green PSL (readout).

3.3. Performance of ODS

An experimental scheme of the optical storage and readout is shown in Figure 4a. The 254 nm UV light is irradiated to the sample through the mask. The electrons in the material are excited and transitioned to the CB, and then captured by the deep trap level and stabilized for a period of time, that is, the letters “USST” are recorded into the storage medium, and the data are read by heating the sample. Figure 4b was photographed in sunlight (i) and 254 nm light (ii). As shown in Figure 4b(iii), LuAG:Ce was covered with a mask, then irradiated with a 254 nm UV lamp for 5 min, and heated to 250 °C; the letters “U, S, S, and T” were read out, and the unirradiated area was black.
Furthermore, the reading of information by NIR photostimulation (980 nm laser) was demonstrated, as shown in Figure 5a. The luminescence decay curve was recorded at room temperature. The sample produced persistent luminescent (PersL) in the dark due to the shallow traps. After 300 s, we used the 980 nm laser (0.7 W) in a periodically on/off mode to excite the sample and recorded the intensity change. A bright emission from the sample was observed after turning on the 980 nm laser, and the intensity was much higher than the PersL. With the increase in laser irradiation time, the intensity gradually decreases, since the electrons in the trap are gradually released by the 980 nm laser. The PSL emission spectra by using the 980 nm laser in different power modes were tested, and as shown in Figure 5b, the emission peak position is basically consistent with Figure 1c. In addition, with the increase in laser power, the emission intensity first increases and then decreases, which corresponds with the “readout” and “erasing” of the 980 nm laser. The above results show that it is possible to readout information at a high speed by the 980 nm laser, which is of great significance to information storage.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we prepared Lu3−xAl5O12:xCe (x = 0.011, 0.013 and 0.015) fluorescent ceramics by the vacuum sintering technique, and its crystal structure, trap level, and optical storage characteristics were systematically studied. The TL intensity is significantly increased by the selective introduction of Ce3+; it acts as a luminescence center. The lutetium aluminum garnet-structured ceramics ensure good cycle stability (25 times). The nature of the trap was discussed, and is it believed that the oxygen vacancies generated by the vacuum sintering environment capture electrons and lead to PSL and TL. Finally, the thermally stimulated readout and PSL properties of the sample were verified, demonstrating the potential of LuAG:Ce in field of optical storage. Currently, LuAG:Ce’s short information storage time and heating-based readout method limit its ODS application. With these results, we hope to promote the development of new storage technology by optimizing material design and combining advanced optical technologies.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ma18010063/s1, Figure S1: Flowchart of the preparation of LuAG:Ce ceramics; Figure S2: Flowchart of the preparation of LuAG:Ce ceramics.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.R.; methodology, M.Z. and J.Z.; software, Q.H.; validation, J.Z.; formal analysis, R.J.; investigation, M.Z. and J.Z.; resources, H.R. and H.L.; data curation, Q.H. and J.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, J.Z.; writing—review and editing, H.R. and H.L.; visualization, R.J. and Q.H.; supervision, H.R. and H.L.; project administration, H.R.; funding acquisition, H.R. and H.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFB2802001).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Gu, M.; Li, X.; Cao, Y. Optical storage arrays: A perspective for future big data storage. Light Sci. Appl. 2014, 3, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gu, M.; Zhang, Q.; Lamon, S. Nanomaterials for optical data storage. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2016, 1, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhao, M.; Wen, J.; Hu, Q.; Wei, X.; Zhong, Y.; Ruan, H.; Gu, M. A 3D nanoscale optical disk memory with petabit capacity. Nature 2024, 626, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hell, S.W.; Wichmann, J. Breaking the diffraction resolution limit by stimulated emission: Stimulated-emission-depletion fluorescence microscopy. Opt. Lett. 1994, 19, 780–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Bozinovic, N.; Yue, Y.; Ren, Y.; Tur, M.; Kristensen, P.; Huang, H.; Willner, A.E.; Ramachandran, S. Terabit-Scale Orbital Angular Momentum Mode Division Multiplexing in Fibers. Science 2013, 340, 1545–1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Huang, L.; Chen, X.; Mühlenbernd, H.; Zhang, H.; Chen, S.; Bai, B.; Tan, Q.; Jin, G.; Cheah, K.W.; Qiu, C.; et al. Three-dimensional optical holography using a plasmonic metasurface. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cumpston, B.H.; Ananthavel, S.P.; Barlow, S.; Dyer, D.L.; Ehrlich, J.E.; Erskine, L.L.; Heikal, A.A.; Kuebler, S.M.; Lee, I.Y.S.; McCord-Maughon, D.; et al. Two-photon polymerization initiators for three-dimensional optical data storage and microfabrication. Nature 1999, 398, 51–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kawata, S.; Kawata, Y. Three-dimensional optical data storage using photochromic materials. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 1777–1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Parthenopoulos, D.A.; Rentzepis, P.M. Three-dimensional optical storage memory. Science 1989, 245, 843–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Lindmayer, J. A new erasable optical memory. Solid State Technol. 1988, 31, 135–138. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhuang, Y.; Chen, D.; Chen, W.; Zhang, W.; Su, X.; Deng, R.; An, Z.; Chen, H.; Xie, R. X-ray-charged bright persistent luminescence in NaYF4:Ln3+@NaYF4 nanoparticles for multidimensional optical information storage. Light Sci. Appl. 2021, 10, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Li, P.; Hua, Y.; Ye, R.; Cai, M.; Xu, S.; Zhang, J. SrAl2O4 crystallite embedded inorganic medium with super-long persistent luminescence, thermoluminescence, and photostimulable luminescence for smart optical information storage. Photonics Res. 2022, 10, 381–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lin, S.; Lin, H.; Ma, C.; Cheng, Y.; Ye, S.; Lin, F.; Li, R.; Xu, J.; Wang, Y. High-security-level multi-dimensional optical storage medium: Nanostructured glass embedded with LiGa5O8: Mn2+ with photostimulated luminescence. Light Sci. Appl. 2020, 9, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ueda, J.; Kuroishi, K.; Tanabe, S. Bright persistent ceramic phosphors of Ce3+-Cr3+-codoped garnet able to store by blue light. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 104, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bian, H.; Qin, X.; Wu, Y.; Yi, Z.; Liu, S.; Wang, Y.; Brites, C.D.S.; Carlos, L.D.; Liu, X. Multimodal Tuning of Synaptic Plasticity Using Persistent Luminescent Memitters. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Lv, X.; Liang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, D.; Shan, X.; Wang, X.-J. Deep-trap ultraviolet persistent phosphor for advanced optical storage application in bright environments. Light Sci. Appl. 2024, 13, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Jutamulia, S.; Storti, G.M.; Lindmayer, J.; Seiderman, W. Use of electron trapping materials in optical signal processing. 1: Parallel Boolean logic. Appl. Opt. 1990, 29, 4806–4811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Wu, J.; Newman, D.; Viney, I.V.F. Study on relationship of luminescence in CaS:Eu,Sm and dopants concentration. J. Lumin. 2002, 99, 237–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pashaie, R.; Farhat, N.H. Optical realization of bioinspired spiking neurons in the electron trapping material thin film. Appl. Opt. 2007, 46, 8411–8418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sun, J.; Liu, Z.; Du, H. Effect of trivalent rare earth ions doping on the fluorescence properties of electron trapping materials SrS:Eu2+. J. Rare Earths 2011, 29, 101–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhuang, Y.; Wang, L.; Lv, Y.; Zhou, T.; Xie, R. Optical Data Storage and Multicolor Emission Readout on Flexible Films Using Deep-Trap Persistent Luminescence Materials. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, Y.; Chen, D.; Zhuang, Y.; Chen, W.; Long, H.; Chen, H.; Xie, R. NaMgF3:Tb3+@NaMgF3 Nanoparticles Containing Deep Traps for Optical Information Storage. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2021, 9, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Deng, M.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, C.; Guo, X.; Zhou, Z.; Xu, X. Novel Co-Doped Y2GeO5:Pr3+,Tb3+: Deep Trap Level Formation and Analog Binary Optical Storage with Submicron Information Points. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2021, 9, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lin, S.; Lin, H.; Huang, Q.; Cheng, Y.; Xu, J.; Wang, J.; Xiang, X.; Wang, C.; Zhang, L.; Wang, Y. A Photostimulated BaSi2O5:Eu2+,Nd3+ Phosphor-in-Glass for Erasable-Rewritable Optical Storage Medium. Laser Photonics Rev. 2019, 13, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fu, J.; Feng, S.; Genevois, C.; Veron, E.; Yang, Y.; Wang, H.; Ma, Z.; Bai, L.; Xu, W.; Fan, R.; et al. Green-emissive Ce3+:Lu3Al5O12-Al2O3 nanoceramics elaborated via glass crystallization for high-power laser lighting applications. J. Mater. Chem. C 2024, 12, 7188–7196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hao, W.; Wang, X.-J.; Guo, J.; Liu, J.; Li, S.; Xu, X. Fabrication of LuAG:Ce-Al2O3 eutectics via laser-heated pedestal growth technique for high-power laser-driven lighting. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2024, 107, 8291–8298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ling, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Xu, W.; Zhou, Y.; Hong, M. Ultrathin green-emitting LuAG:Ce-Al2O3 composite fine-grained ceramics for high-brightness chip-scale packaging LEDs. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2025, 45, 116948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhu, D.; Cai, J.; Beitlerova, A.; Kucerkova, R.; Hu, C.; Zhou, Z.; Chewpraditkul, W.; Nikl, M.; Li, J. Stoichiometric modulation and scintillation property characterization of Ce,Ca:LuAG ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2024, 107, 6844–6852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ding, H.; Liu, Z.; Hu, P.; Liu, Y.; Sun, P.; Luo, Z.; Chen, X.; Jiang, H.; Jiang, J. High Efficiency Green-Emitting LuAG:Ce Ceramic Phosphors for Laser Diode Lighting. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2021, 9, 2002141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhuang, Y.; Chen, D.; Xie, R. Persistent Luminescent Materials with Deep Traps for Optical Information Storage. Laser Optoelectron. Prog. 2021, 58, 1516001-1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, W.; Zhuang, Y.; Zheng, P.; Zhou, T.-L.; Xu, J.; Ueda, J.; Tanabe, S.; Wang, L.; Xie, R.-J. Tailoring Trap Depth and Emission Wavelength in Y3Al5-x,GaxO12:Ce3+,V3+ Phosphor-in-Glass Films for Optical Information Storage. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 27150–27159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Tang, Y.; Deng, M.; Wang, M.; Liu, X.; Zhou, Z.; Wang, J.; Liu, Q. Bismuth-Activated Persistent Phosphors. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2023, 11, 2201827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tang, Y.; Deng, M.; Zhou, Z.; Xu, X.; Wang, J.; Liu, Q. Bi-activated MgGa2O4 phosphors with rich defect energy levels: Spectral property and optical storage applications. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 19141–19149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wen, Q.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, C.; Xu, L.; Wang, X.; Xu, Y.; Lin, S.; Liang, X.; Liu, J.; Xiang, W. Ultrahigh Power Density LuAG:Ce Green Converters For High-Luminance Laser-Driven Solid State Lighting. Laser Photonics Rev. 2023, 17, 2200909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bos, A.J.J.; Dorenbos, P.; Bessière, A.; Lecointre, A.; Bedu, M.; Bettinelli, M.; Piccinelli, F. Study of TL glow curves of YPO4 double doped with lanthanide ions. Radiat. Meas. 2011, 46, 1410–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bos, A.J.J. High sensitivity thermoluminescence dosimetry. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B 2001, 184, 3–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yuan, L.; Jin, Y.; Su, Y.; Wu, H.; Hu, Y.; Yang, S. Optically Stimulated Luminescence Phosphors: Principles, Applications, and Prospects. Laser Photonics Rev. 2020, 14, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hu, Z.; Guan, J.; Zheng, S.; Chai, Z.; Wu, S.; Liu, D.; Su, J.; Shi, F.; Duan, C.; Wang, Y.; et al. Burn After Read: A Rewritable Multiplexing Optical Information Storage and Encryption Method. Laser Photonics Rev. 2024, 18, 2301024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lai, X.; Fang, Z.; Zhang, J.; Wang, B.; Zhu, W.; Zhang, R. Structure and luminescence properties of Ce3+-activated BaLu2Al2Ga2SiO12 persistent phosphors for optical information storage. Opt. Mater. 2021, 120, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, L.; Li, T.; Hu, Y.; Cai, C.; Li, Y.; Zhang, X.; Liang, B.; Yang, Y.; Qiu, J. Mechanism of the trivalent lanthanides’ persistent luminescence in wide bandgap materials. Light Sci. Appl. 2022, 11, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gallo, S.; Veronese, I.; Vedda, A.; Fasoli, M. Evidence of Optically Stimulated Luminescence in Lu3Al5O12:Ce. Phys. Status Solidi A 2019, 216, 1900103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Trojan-Piegza, J.; Niittykoski, J.; Holsa, J.; Zych, E. Thermoluminescence and kinetics of persistent luminescence of vacuum-sintered Tb3+-doped and Tb3+, Ca2+-codoped LU2O3 materials. Chem. Mater. 2008, 20, 2252–2261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wang, C.; Deng, M.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Q.; Zhou, Z.; Xu, X.; He, H. Multicomponent garnet phosphor (LuYGd)(Al4Ga)O12:Ce3+,V3+: Trap modulation via reductive gas annealing and an optical information storage property. Opt. Mater. Express 2021, 11, 2256–2267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hu, C.; Liu, S.; Shi, Y.; Kou, H.; Li, J.; Pan, Y.; Feng, X.; Liu, Q. Antisite defects in nonstoichiometric Lu3Al5O12:Ce ceramic scintillators. Phys. Status Solidi B 2015, 252, 1993–1999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhou, T.; Zhang, L.; Selim, F.A.; Sun, R.; Wong, C.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Q. Annealing induced discoloration of transparent YAG ceramics using divalent additives in solid-state reaction sintering. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2017, 37, 4123–4128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chen, X.; Hu, Z.; Dai, J.; Chen, H.; Shi, Y.; Kou, H.; Wang, T.; Vedda, A.; Beitlerova, A.; Kucerkova, R.; et al. The influence of air annealing on the microstructure and scintillation properties of Ce,Mg:LuAG ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2019, 102, 1805–1813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) XRD patterns of LuAG:xCe (x = 0.011, 0.013 and 0.015). (b) Rietveld refinement of LuAG:0.013Ce. (c) PLE and PL spectra of LuAG:xCe (λem = 512 nm, λex = 437 nm). (d) SEM image of LuAG:0.013Ce3+.
Figure 1. (a) XRD patterns of LuAG:xCe (x = 0.011, 0.013 and 0.015). (b) Rietveld refinement of LuAG:0.013Ce. (c) PLE and PL spectra of LuAG:xCe (λem = 512 nm, λex = 437 nm). (d) SEM image of LuAG:0.013Ce3+.
Materials 18 00063 g001
Figure 2. (a) TL curves of LuAG:xCe3+. (b) TL curves with different heating rate of LuAG:0.013Ce3+ (Inset: Heating rate plots of LuAG:0.013Ce3+). (c) TL curves of LuAG:0.013Ce3+ for different delay time (Inset: Integral area of TL curves as function of delay time). (d) The rewritability test of LuAG:0.013Ce3+.
Figure 2. (a) TL curves of LuAG:xCe3+. (b) TL curves with different heating rate of LuAG:0.013Ce3+ (Inset: Heating rate plots of LuAG:0.013Ce3+). (c) TL curves of LuAG:0.013Ce3+ for different delay time (Inset: Integral area of TL curves as function of delay time). (d) The rewritability test of LuAG:0.013Ce3+.
Materials 18 00063 g002
Figure 3. (a) TL curves of LuAG:Ce before and after annealing at 1000 °C. (b) A diagram of the information storage principle.
Figure 3. (a) TL curves of LuAG:Ce before and after annealing at 1000 °C. (b) A diagram of the information storage principle.
Materials 18 00063 g003
Figure 4. (a) Diagram of the optical storage application. (b) Photos of LuAG:Ce under (i) sunlight; (ii) under 254 nm light; (iii) the sample was covered with photomask “U”, “S”, “S”, and “T” for 5 min and heated to 250 °C.
Figure 4. (a) Diagram of the optical storage application. (b) Photos of LuAG:Ce under (i) sunlight; (ii) under 254 nm light; (iii) the sample was covered with photomask “U”, “S”, “S”, and “T” for 5 min and heated to 250 °C.
Materials 18 00063 g004
Figure 5. Sample was excited by 254 nm light for 15 min. (a) Luminescence decay curve of the sample. (b) Photostimulated luminescence (PSL) curves of the ceramic by 980 nm laser in different power settings.
Figure 5. Sample was excited by 254 nm light for 15 min. (a) Luminescence decay curve of the sample. (b) Photostimulated luminescence (PSL) curves of the ceramic by 980 nm laser in different power settings.
Materials 18 00063 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, J.; Zhao, M.; Hu, Q.; Jiang, R.; Ruan, H.; Lin, H. Lu3Al5O12:Ce3+ Fluorescent Ceramic with Deep Traps: Thermoluminescence and Photostimulable Luminescence Properties. Materials 2025, 18, 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18010063

AMA Style

Zhang J, Zhao M, Hu Q, Jiang R, Ruan H, Lin H. Lu3Al5O12:Ce3+ Fluorescent Ceramic with Deep Traps: Thermoluminescence and Photostimulable Luminescence Properties. Materials. 2025; 18(1):63. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18010063

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Junwei, Miao Zhao, Qiao Hu, Renjie Jiang, Hao Ruan, and Hui Lin. 2025. "Lu3Al5O12:Ce3+ Fluorescent Ceramic with Deep Traps: Thermoluminescence and Photostimulable Luminescence Properties" Materials 18, no. 1: 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18010063

APA Style

Zhang, J., Zhao, M., Hu, Q., Jiang, R., Ruan, H., & Lin, H. (2025). Lu3Al5O12:Ce3+ Fluorescent Ceramic with Deep Traps: Thermoluminescence and Photostimulable Luminescence Properties. Materials, 18(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18010063

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop