Next Article in Journal
Theoretical and Experimental Research on the Short-Range Structure in Gallium Melts Based on the Wulff Cluster Model
Previous Article in Journal
Abrasive Wear Performance of Spherical Hierarchical Structured TiC/High-Manganese Steel Composites
Previous Article in Special Issue
Exploring the Reconfigurable Memory Effect in Electroforming-Free YMnO3-Based Resistive Switches: Towards a Tunable Frequency Response
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Doping on Elastic Strain in Crystalline Ge-Sb-Te

1
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea
2
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Kumoh National Institute of Technology, Gumi 39177, Republic of Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2025, 18(1), 132; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18010132
Submission received: 27 October 2024 / Revised: 10 December 2024 / Accepted: 23 December 2024 / Published: 31 December 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Semiconductor/Memory Materials and Devices)

Abstract

Phase-change random access memory (PcRAM) faces significant challenges due to the inherent instability of amorphous Ge2Sb2Te5 (GST). While doping has emerged as an effective method for amorphous stabilization, understanding the precise mechanisms of structural modification and their impact on material stability remains a critical challenge. This study provides a comprehensive investigation of elastic strain and stress in crystalline lattices induced by various dopants (C, N, and Al) through systematic measurements of film thickness changes during crystallization. Through detailed analysis of cross-sectional electron microscopy data and theoretical calculations, we reveal distinct behavior patterns between interstitial and substitutional dopants. Interstitial dopants (C and N) generate substantial elastic strain energy (~9 J/g) due to their smaller atomic radii (0.07–0.08 nm) and ability to occupy spaces between lattice sites. In contrast, substitutional dopants (Al) produce lower strain energy (~5 J/g) due to their similar atomic radius (0.14 nm) to host atoms. We demonstrate that N doping achieves higher elastic strain energy compared to C doping, attributed to its preferential formation of Ge-N bonds and resulting lattice distortions. The correlation between dopant properties, structural features, and induced strain energy provides quantitative insights for optimizing dopant selection. These findings establish a fundamental framework for understanding dopant-induced thermodynamic stabilization in GST materials, offering practical guidelines for enhancing the reliability and performance of next-generation PcRAM devices.
Keywords: PcRAM; Ge2Sb2Te5; amorphous phase; elastic strain energy; C-doping; N-doping; Al-doping PcRAM; Ge2Sb2Te5; amorphous phase; elastic strain energy; C-doping; N-doping; Al-doping

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cho, J.-Y.; Lee, S.-Y. Effects of Doping on Elastic Strain in Crystalline Ge-Sb-Te. Materials 2025, 18, 132. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18010132

AMA Style

Cho J-Y, Lee S-Y. Effects of Doping on Elastic Strain in Crystalline Ge-Sb-Te. Materials. 2025; 18(1):132. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18010132

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cho, Ju-Young, and So-Yeon Lee. 2025. "Effects of Doping on Elastic Strain in Crystalline Ge-Sb-Te" Materials 18, no. 1: 132. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18010132

APA Style

Cho, J.-Y., & Lee, S.-Y. (2025). Effects of Doping on Elastic Strain in Crystalline Ge-Sb-Te. Materials, 18(1), 132. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18010132

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop