Next Article in Journal
Influence of Sulfurization Time on Sb2S3 Synthesis Using a New Graphite Box Design
Next Article in Special Issue
Analysis of the Deterioration Mechanisms of Tools in the Process of Forging Elements for the Automotive Industry from Nickel–Chromium Steel in Order to Select a Wear-Limiting Coating
Previous Article in Journal
Correlation between the Chemical Structure of (Meth)Acrylic Monomers and the Properties of Powder Clear Coatings Based on the Polyacrylate Resins
Previous Article in Special Issue
Possibilities of Measuring and Detecting Defects of Forged Parts in Die Hot-Forging Processes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Classification of Visual Smoothness Standards Using Multi-Scale Areal Texture Parameters and Low-Magnification Coherence Scanning Interferometry

Department of Mechanical Engineering, UNC Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2024, 17(7), 1653; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17071653
Submission received: 19 November 2023 / Revised: 7 March 2024 / Accepted: 12 March 2024 / Published: 3 April 2024

Abstract

The ability to objectively specify surface finish to ensure consistent visual appearance addresses a vital need in surface coating engineering. This work demonstrates how a computational framework, called surface quality and inspection descriptors (SQuID™), can be leveraged to effectively rank different grades of surface finish appearances. ISO 25178-2 areal surface metrics extracted from bandpass-filtered measurements of a set of ten visual smoothness standards taken on a coherent scanning interferometer are used to quantify different grades of powder-coated surface finish. The ability to automatically classify the standard tiles using multi-scale areal texture parameters is compared to parameters obtained from a hand-held gloss meter. The results indicate that the ten different surface finishes can be automatically classified with accuracies as low as 65% and as high as 99%, depending on the filtering and parameters used to quantify the surfaces. The highest classification accuracy is achieved using only five multi-scale topography descriptions of the surface.
Keywords: visual appearance; powder coating; surface texture; multi-scale; orange peel; gloss; classification; machine learning visual appearance; powder coating; surface texture; multi-scale; orange peel; gloss; classification; machine learning

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Redford, J.; Mullany, B. Classification of Visual Smoothness Standards Using Multi-Scale Areal Texture Parameters and Low-Magnification Coherence Scanning Interferometry. Materials 2024, 17, 1653. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17071653

AMA Style

Redford J, Mullany B. Classification of Visual Smoothness Standards Using Multi-Scale Areal Texture Parameters and Low-Magnification Coherence Scanning Interferometry. Materials. 2024; 17(7):1653. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17071653

Chicago/Turabian Style

Redford, Jesse, and Brigid Mullany. 2024. "Classification of Visual Smoothness Standards Using Multi-Scale Areal Texture Parameters and Low-Magnification Coherence Scanning Interferometry" Materials 17, no. 7: 1653. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17071653

APA Style

Redford, J., & Mullany, B. (2024). Classification of Visual Smoothness Standards Using Multi-Scale Areal Texture Parameters and Low-Magnification Coherence Scanning Interferometry. Materials, 17(7), 1653. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17071653

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop