Next Article in Journal
Effect of Al/Ni Ratio on the Microstructure and Properties of Nickel–Aluminum Bronze Alloys
Next Article in Special Issue
Shape–Preserved CoFeNi–MOF/NF Exhibiting Superior Performance for Overall Water Splitting across Alkaline and Neutral Conditions
Previous Article in Journal
Mechanical Properties of Lattice Structures with a Central Cube: Experiments and Simulations
Previous Article in Special Issue
Iodine-Doped Hollow Carbon Nanocages without Templates Strategy for Boosting Zinc-Ion Storage by Nucleophilicity
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 17
Issue 6
10.3390/ma17061331
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study of the Durability of Membrane Electrode Assemblies in Various Accelerated Stress Tests for Proton-Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysis

by
Zhengquan Su
1,2,
Jun Liu
2,*,
Pengfei Li
2 and
Changhao Liang
2
1
Institute of Physical Science and Information Technology, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China
2
Key Laboratory of Materials Physics, Anhui Key Laboratory of Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology, Institute of Solid State Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2024, 17(6), 1331; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17061331
Submission received: 24 February 2024 / Revised: 11 March 2024 / Accepted: 12 March 2024 / Published: 14 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Electrocatalytic Materials for Energy and Environmental Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this work, we focus on the degradation of membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs) in proton-exchange membrane water electrolysis (PEMWE) induced by different accelerated stress tests (ASTs), including constant-current mode, square-wave mode, and solar photovoltaic mode. In constant-current mode, at continuous testing for 600 h at 80 °C, a degradation of operating voltage increased by the enhanced current density from 22 µV/h (1 A/cm2) to 50 µV/h (3 A/cm2). In square-wave mode, we found that in the narrow fluctuation range (1–2 A/cm2), the shorter step time (2 s) generates a higher degradation rate of operating voltage, but in the wide fluctuation range (1–3 A/cm2), the longer step time (22 s) induces a faster operating voltage rise. In the solar photovoltaic mode, we used a simulation of 11 h sunshine duration containing multiple constant-current and square-wave modes, which is closest to the actual application environment. Over 1400 h ASTs, the solar photovoltaic mode lead to the most serious voltage rise of 87.7 µV/h. These results are beneficial to understanding the durability of the PEM electrolyzer and optimizing the components of MEAs, such as catalysts, membranes, and gas diffusion layers.

1. Introduction

The extensive usage of fossil fuels has exacerbated environmental issues, intensifying the urgent need to develop alternative energy sources. In line with the swift progress in wind and solar photovoltaic power installation, the development of suitable energy storage solutions is imperative [1]. In a perfect scenario, the combination of water decomposition and renewable energy sources could offer a practical approach to converting excess energy into hydrogen, a promising solution for both renewable energy storage and fluctuation challenges [2,3,4]. Proton-exchange membrane water electrolysis (PEMWE) stands out as a leading method for clean hydrogen production due to its compact design, high efficiency, and operational flexibility, which enable its direct coupling with renewable energy sources [5]. Nevertheless, the intermittency of and fluctuation in renewable energy sources can degrade the performance of proton-exchange membrane water electrolysers, potentially leading to increased voltage values in the electrolyzer [6]. Aiming at this issue, the challenge lies in effectively assessing durability under laboratory conditions and identifying the critical degradation parameters, particularly during dynamic operation, which is not yet well understood [7,8].
The operational lifespan of PEMWE have been the subject of numerous studies in the literature [9,10,11,12,13,14]. It has been well accepted that both constant-current (static) mode and square-wave (dynamic) mode may lead to performance degradation. The overall performance degradation of an electrolyzer mainly comes from the degradation of the MEA, which results from two sources: the proton-exchange membrane and the catalyst. A proton-exchange membrane could degrade or become contaminated, which would result in degradation of the electrolytic performance. Membrane degradation is divided into three categories: mechanical, chemical, and thermal degradation. Of these, chemical and thermal degradation are more affected by fluctuations in the power supply. In the anode of an electrolyzer, water undergoes an oxidation reaction, and H2O2 or hydroxyl radicals generated through the two-electron reaction pathway attack the hydrocarbon chain segments of the perfluorinated sulfonic acid membrane, causing the membrane to degrade [10]. When faced with fluctuating conditions, the uneven distribution of current in the catalyst layer produces a local hot area that causes uneven heating of the proton-exchange membrane, resulting in membrane expansion or deformation, and at the same time, the small amount of hydrogen and oxygen that passes through the membrane reacts with exothermic heat [15], which also produces a local hot area, thus accelerating the degradation reaction of the membrane. And catalyst degradation can be further categorized into redeposition, Ostwald ripening, and coalescence degradation [16,17]. In the constant-current mode, when operating at a current density of 3 A/cm2 for 1000 h, it was observed that the corrosion rate at 3 A/cm2 was triple that at 1 A/cm2 [18]. Chandesris et al. [19] have discovered that variations in current density had a negligible impact on attenuation under constant-current test conditions of 10 A/cm2. However, this constant-current operation does not accurately reflect the actual conditions of PEMWE application. Li et al. [20,21] have conducted experiments with low-current fluctuations ranging from 0 to 0.5 A/cm2 and 1.2 to 2 A/cm2, demonstrating that low-current cycling had a more significant effect on voltage degradation, and that a reduction in ohmic losses under high-current cycling indicated membrane thinning and failure. Rakousky [22,23] and Fouda-Onana [24] have attributed the degradation to the oxidation of the porous titanium plate, which serves as a transport layer, as well as the thinning of the polymeric membrane. Rakousky et al. [25] have investigated PEMWE with five different current density fluctuation curves and identified varying degrees of degradation. Steffen et al. [26] have systematically examined the impact of different dynamic modes on the degradation of PEMWE, finding that faster current cycling enhanced the overall performance over a test duration of 500 h. Despite this, the precise degradation mechanisms [27,28,29,30,31,32] that impact their performance remain largely unexplained. Furthermore, there is ongoing ambiguity regarding the differential influence of various current modes, such as the dynamic rate of the current on the degradation rates.
As the MEA production process continues to advance, performance and stability have been improved, and in order to assess the stability of the new MEA, it is necessary to run it for a longer period of time, which undoubtedly greatly increases the time cost. For MEAs with excellent stability performance, it is more difficult to observe the performance in the later period of the test, so some extreme test conditions are needed to accelerate the aging of MEA, so that the MEA can reach the state in the later period of the test in a relatively shorter period of time. Aiming at this issue, we have designed three acceleration schemes in the hope of finding the factor that causes the rapid degradation of MEA performance in electrolyzer. The three acceleration schemes are constant-current mode for 600 h, square-wave mode for 600 h, and simulating solar PV mode over 1400 h, which are used in this work to investigate the effects of current density, fluctuation range, and step time on the voltage rise of a PEM electrolyzer. Corresponding EIS investigations were performed to explain the very reason for the degradation rate of MEAs.

2. Experimental

2.1. Membrane Electrode Assemblies and Test Bench Setup

The membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs) were provided by Anhui Contango New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. (Hefei, China), where Pt/C with a loading of 0.5 mg/cm2 and Ir black with a loading of 1.0 mg/cm2 were used as cathode catalysts and anode catalysts, respectively. The PEM membrane with a thickness of 120 µm (DM6321A) was from Dongyue Future Hydrogen Energy Co., Ltd. (Zibo, China) Carbon paper (TGP-H-60, Toray, Tokyo, Japan) with a thickness of 0.18 mm was employed as the cathode gas diffusion layer (GDL), and Pt-coated porous sintered titanium was used as the anode GDL. The cathode end-plate had serpentine-shaped flow fields and the anode end-plate had dotted flow fields. The effective active area of the MEA in all the experiments was 30.624 cm2 (5.80 cm × 5.28 cm). The single-cell electrolyzer was secured with screws and nuts, and the amount of compression was set at 2.7 MPa for this experiment. The structure of the electrolyser used in this experiment is shown schematically in Figure S1. The single-cell electrolyzer was connected to a 6 mm inner diameter water flow line, and a pump continuously supplied deionized water to the PEMWE at a flow rate of 100 mL/min to circulate the deionized water between the tank and the PEMWE anode and replenish the tank with deionized water at regular intervals in order to minimize the adverse effects of the decrease in water on the membrane electrodes as a result of the increase in the concentration of ions. A variety of current switching processes were implemented on the PEMWE system with a temperature of 80 °C for durability test.

2.2. Electrochemical Measurements

Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements were performed in yhr constant-current mode at a frequency range between 10 kHz and 1 Hz. The cyclic voltammetry curve was measured at a scan rate of 0.01 V/s over a voltage range of 0.05–1.3 V. More detailed experimental procedures of this investigation are displayed in Figure S2. The durability experimental tests were performed by a computer-controlled DC power supply, temperature probe, voltmeter, impedance meter, and electrochemical workstation, which contained the following steps:
(1)
Activation process: Before the performance test, an activation procedure was applied to the electrolyzer using ITECH’s DC power supply IT-M3110 (ITECH, Nanjing, China) to provide current, and it was carried out in the following order: 0.2 A/cm2 for 1 h, 1 A/cm2 for 1 h, 2 V for 0.5 h, 1.7 V for 2 h, and 2 V for 0.5 h.
(2)
Accelerated stress tests (ASTs): Three types of ASTs were performed. The first one was the constant-current mode test at 1 A/cm2, 2 A/cm2, and 3 A/cm2; The second was square-wave mode tests fluctuating in the range of 1–2 A/cm2 and 1–3 A/cm2; a cycle of the square-wave mode consisted of two parts, a current-holding part and a current-change part. In this investigation, the current-holding part was used for 28 s dwell time, while the current-varying part was used for different step times (2 s, 12 s, and 22 s). The last AST simulated a solar fluctuation, using the power generated in Qinghai, China, during 13 h of sunshine on a day in June 2022. Detailed parameters of the ASTs are displayed in Table 1, and the corresponding test waveforms are shown in Figure 1a–d.

3. Results and Discussion

This section compares the degradation in different operation modes; however, in order to better understand the dynamic mode of operation of the grid service and discuss the impact of transient changes in PV power generation on the electrolyzer, the analysis focuses on the discussion of the AST, which has faster degradation rates: N02 and W22. Although, none of them decay as fast as Solar, and the degradation rates for each AST are shown in Table 2.

3.1. PEMWE Performance Change

This investigation is divided into three modes: constant current, square wave, and simulated solar. In the 600 h test time of this experiment, except for the existence of performance enhancement at the beginning of the test, the voltage gradually increases with time thereafter.
Figure 2 shows that the degradation rates of different modes are obviously different. Figure 2a shows the degradation pattern in the constant-current mode, and the three fitted lines show the degradation rates of the three constant currents. Consistent with common sense, a higher current leads to a greater degradation rate. Figure 2b shows the relationship between the degradation rate and the step time for different square-wave fluctuations, and the relationship between the degradation rate and the step time appears to be different for the wide and narrow square-wave tests. The plots of the voltage with time in different square-wave tests are compared, as shown in Figure S3. Briefly, the degradation rate is linearly correlated with the step time, although this trend changes depending on whether a narrow or wide square-wave test is used. Increasing the step time in the wide square-wave test would accelerate degradation; conversely, increasing the step time in the narrow square-wave test would slow degradation. Figure 2c demonstrates that the largest increase in voltage in this investigation is solar. And the data for all sets of voltage over time are shown in Tables S1–S4.
More information could be derived from Figure 3a–c, as after AST, the degradation rate at the larger current was always greater than the degradation at the smaller current. The degradation rate follows a different pattern from the current step time for different square-wave modes. In the wide square-wave mode, the degradation rate of W02 increased from 46.2 μV/h to 52.7 μV/h with W12, continued to increase the current step time W22, and then degradation rate reached a maximum value of 52.8 μV/h calculated at 3 A/cm2. The rate of degradation increased with the increase in the current step time. In contrast, the degradation rate decreased with the increasing step time in the narrow square-mode test. The speculation of this phenomenon is that in the narrow square-wave mode, low current would produce less impact, and the main influencing factor of degradation would be the rapid change in current; meanwhile, in the wide square-wave mode, it would be exposed to higher currents for longer time, the main influencing factor would be the high current, and the degree of impact of the high current would be greater than the current switching process, which explains the increase in the current step time accompanied by an increase in the decay rate. Therefore, this leads the fastest AST obtained from the square-wave mode to be W22.
The constant-current mode test was used to allow the electrolyzer to run at 1 A/cm2, 2 A/cm2, and 3 A/cm2 for 600 h. Polarization curves and EIS were recorded periodically to analyze the degradation pattern. Figure 2a indicates that the fastest AST in the constant-current mode is C3, and Figure 3 shows the electrochemical tests during the test period. Figures S4 and S5 show the difference between the fresh MEA and the MEA after running at a constant-current density of 3 A/cm2 for 600 h, where more cracks and bumps were observed on the surface of the anode catalyst layer by using SEM. Additionally, the content after EDS showed a change in the elemental content, mainly a decrease in the percentage of Ir from 86.62% to 81.71%, an increase in O from 7.79% to 10.45%, and in increase in F from 5.59% to 7.84%. A similar situation occurred with the square-wave mode test and the solar photovoltaic mode ASTs, as shown in Figures S6–S8 (N02, W22, and solar). The CV curves in Figure S9, observed from the initial (0 h), intermediate state (200 and 400 h), and final (600 h) states, show a larger recession in AST at W22, which is consistent with the larger increase in measured voltage.
The IV curve in Figure 3a shows that in the part of the current density that is less than 0.5 A/cm2, the polarization curve basically does not change with time, indicating that the electrolyzer performance is stable and less affected by test condition. However, in the region of higher current density, the voltage gradually increases with time. Although during the early part of this investigation the magnitude of voltage values increased and decreased at times, all the values showed a pattern of degradation after 600 h of AST. Figure 3b shows the Nyquist plot of the EIS spectrum at 0.2 A/cm2; the high-frequency impedance decreases in the early part of AST and then increases, which is consistent with the voltage decrease in the polarization curve in the early part of the AST. The initial and final CV curves of the fastest AST for the constant-current mode are shown in Figure 3c. Usually, the area under the CV curve represents the amount of redox charge involved in the electrochemical reaction. The capacitance current will be less than the initial current, and this is a result of the lower performance of the electrolyzer; the same change has been observed in previous studies [33,34]. The average oxidation and reduction currents of the electrolyzer decreased after the durability test, the catalytic performance decreased, and the degradation was evident in the electrochemical characterization tests.
Figure 4 shows the degradation of the three ASTs in wide square-wave mode, with the average degradation rate calculated every 100 h for a total of 600 h of degradation. The average degradation rate at different times of the wide square mode can be seen from Figure 4a–c, except for the 100 h at the beginning of the experiment. Due to other factors, W12 has a faster degradation in the same fluctuation range, and then all of the wide square-wave modes satisfy the pattern that the degradation rate and the current step time are positively correlated. Passivation of Ti tends to occur at high potentials because when the titanium capacitive is passivated and an oxide layer is formed on the surface, the oxide layer prevents the transfer of electrons and ions, leading to an increase in electrolytic resistance, which in turn requires a higher voltage to maintain a certain current density [35,36]. This will increase the energy consumption and voltage of the electrolysis process. After the titanium plate passivates to a certain degree, the surface oxide layer will not be significantly thickened by the high voltage; that is, the titanium plate reaches a more stable state due to the existence of the surface oxide layer, which enhances the corrosion resistance and electrochemical stability of the titanium plate at the expense of part of the electrode efficiency to obtain the property of long-term stability. However, since this part of the change occurs inside the electrolyzer, there is no study that can accurately describe the mechanism of the change. Some relevant studies have shown that it is possible to plate a layer of titanium plate with a good conductivity line and electrocatalytic activity Pt, the purpose of which is to artificially inhibit the oxidation of the titanium plate and protect the Ti substrate from corrosion passivation with the Pt layer, which can reduce the electrolysis voltage to a certain extent and improve the performance of the electrolytic water by enhancing the stability of the components.

3.2. Analyzing the Evolution of Resistance

As can be seen in Figure 5b, an impedance spectrum can be described by two semicircles, which correspond to the two R-C models in Figure 5a and are referred to as the high-frequency arc RHF and the low-frequency arc RLF, whose centers are below the real axis. This indicates the presence of non-ideal capacitive behavior [37,38]. The high-frequency intercept on the real axis represents the total ohmic resistance of the electrolyzer, mainly from the electrical or ionic conductive elements, which corresponds to Rohm in the equivalent circuit model. The difference between the low-frequency and high-frequency intercepts of Rohm in the plot is defined as the polarization resistance (Rp). The shape and magnitude of the impedance spectrum of the electrolytic bath significantly change with current density. When the current density is high enough, the polarization resistance (RHF + RLF) becomes small and the impedance becomes mainly ohmic. The literature suggests that the effect of the cathode process is responsible for RHF [39]. On the other hand, the anode process (OER) corresponds to RLF. Since the analysis of impedance at low currents is of practical interest because of the possibility of partial-load operation in grid-balancing services and the phenomena observed at small current densities mainly reflect the behavior of the catalyst, comparatively, the AC impedance at high current densities is not very useful.
The loss of performance is categorized into reversible loss and irreversible loss, and it has been shown that allowing the electrolyzer to dwell time (zero current) for a sufficient period of time could restore some of the reversible loss [41]. In addition to reversible loss, destructive degradation of the catalyst occurs, which results in an increase in the polarization resistance, known as irreversible loss. Apart from the effect of the catalyst, other factors that contribute to the voltage increase include the decline in individual components in the electrolyzer.
The relevant literature indicates that the changes in electrolyzer performance can be explained by the changes in the proton exchange membrane and PTL, and the effect of PTL is mainly a negative effect due to surface corrosion and the passivation of the Ti plate, but there may also be other effects on non-ohmic resistance. The common method used today is the Nyquist plot, where the high-frequency impedance represents the total ohmic impedance. In this investigation, the high-frequency impedance was analyzed to understand the change in ohmic impedance of the membrane electrodes in different ASTs.
Figure 6 shows the percentage rate of change in high-frequency impedance with time, at a current density of 2 A/cm2. In this investigation design of ASTs, a slight decrease in high-frequency impedance at the beginning of the test can be observed. We speculate that it is the insufficient activation process that produces this phenomenon, so all the first 100 h are regarded as the activation time in the impedance calculation process; thereafter, the increase in high-frequency impedance was mainly due to the effect of the titanium plate [18,25]. By analyzing the graphs as the ohmic resistance increases, the degradation rate due to a combination of influences other than the titanium plate can be obtained. The total degradation rate was extracted from the polarization curve, except for first 100 h at 2 A/cm2+, and HFR increasing was used to calculate the degradation from the titanium plate, which was subtracted to obtain the non-ohmic degradation. From Figure 7, although the pattern of total degradation rate versus current step time varied with square-wave mode, evidently, as the step time increases, the degradation rate due to ohmic impedance, i.e., the negative impact of corrosion and passivation on the performance of the titanium plate, decreases. This was probably due to the shorter residual time of oxygen within the electrode operation during cyclic operation. This is also the reason suggested earlier as a reason for lower local membrane dehydration of the proton membrane dehydration.
Compared with the previous ASTs in this investigation, the ohmic impedance follows the same law of becoming smaller and then increasing. Because the durability test time is long for 1430 h, and the ohmic impedance decrease was observed in the first 100 h, which indicates that the passivation of the Ti plate was basically stable, the decrease in the ohmic value in the early part of the investigation was caused by the incomplete activation process.
The degradation rates shown in Figure 6a are consistent with common sense, and high current will promote degradation. C1 is special, as the final high-frequency impedance has a very small reduction compared to the start, indicating that the influence of C1 on the titanium plate is small. Alongside this, the membrane and the titanium plate bring about the effect to counteract each other, so the 1 A/cm2 current mode is not able to accelerate degradation. Figure 6b,c shows the percentage change in high-frequency impedance in the square-wave mode, and larger changes occur in the wide square-wave mode, affected by high current. Meanwhile, Figure 6d illustrates that solar simulation would cause more severe corrosion and passivation of the titanium plates, in the form of increased high-frequency impedance.
Figure 7 shows that the separation of voltage degradation rate and the phenomenon of high-frequency impedance decrease exist in the first 100 h of each AST, indicating that the electrolyzer has not reached a stable state; consequently, it is not included in the calculation of the degradation rate separation. Thereafter, the high-frequency impedance continues to increase, implying that the titanium plate is gradually corroding and passivating. Interestingly, different from the law of total degradation rate, the voltage degradation due to ohmic resistance decreases when increasing the step time. The speculation of this phenomenon is that the gas produced from the catalyst layer is not discharged in time under the case of rapid current change and remains in the GDL; thus, the insufficient exchange of substances increases the impedance value, which ultimately leads to irreversible damage to the membrane electrodes.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we investigated the impact of different AST conditions on an electrolyzer’s performance, including constant-current, square-wave, and simulate photovoltaic fluctuations, by collecting polarization curves and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy data, offering comprehensive insights into the electrolyzer’s performance dynamics.
In the constant-current density mode tests, a consistent consensus was that the higher current density yields higher degradation rates of the operating voltage compared to the instances involving lower current densities. The square-wave measurements lead to two counter trends: within a narrow fluctuation range (1–2 A/cm2), the short step time (2 s) exhibits a higher degradation rate compared to the long step times (12 and 22 s). However, within a wide fluctuation range (1–3 A/cm2), the trend is inverse. The degradation rate associated with the current step time of 22 s was observed to be higher than those of the 2 and 12 s. For the simulating solar test, which consists of multiple constant-current density and square-wave modes, the investigations indicate that a high current density and long step time would lead to the most serious degradation rate compared with other ASTs.
Our investigation offers valuable insights into accelerating test efficiency and understanding service life by elucidating the intricate relationship between current-related parameters and electrolyzer performance degradation. Understanding these factors makes it possible to balance research with the design and operation of PEM electrolysis systems to improve overall performance and reliability. Consequently, when executing ASTs that encompass high-current conditions, meticulous consideration and balance of all component responses become imperative. This equilibrium is crucial due to the interconnected nature of the system components.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ma17061331/s1. Figure S1. A graphical outline of accelerated stress tests. Figure S2. (a) Schematic diagram of the structure and (b) exploded view of the electrolyzer used in the investigation. Figure S3. Degradation rate of narrow square wave mode in (a) 1 A/cm2 and (b) 2 A/cm2, and degradation rate in (c) 1 A/cm2 and (d) 3 A/cm2 for wide square wave mode, the slope k represents the degradation rate. Figure S4. (a) High and (b) low magnification SEM images and (c–f) EDS mappings of the fresh MEA used in this investigation. Figure S5. (a) High and (b) low magnification SEM images and (c–f) EDS mappings of the MEA after constant current mode AST C3. Figure S6. (a) High and (b) low magnification SEM images and (c–f) EDS mappings of the MEA after narrow square wave mode AST N02. Figure S7. (a) High and (b) low magnification SEM images and (c–f) EDS mappings of the MEA after wide square wave mode AST W22. Figure S8. (a) High and (b) low magnification SEM images and (c–f) EDS mappings of the MEA after solar photovoltaic mode AST. Figure S9. CV curves over time in (a) constant current density mode AST C3, (b) narrow square wave mode AST N02 and (c) wide square wave mode AST W22. Table S1. Voltage at different times in constant current test. Table S2. Voltage in 1 A/cm2 and 2 A/cm2 at different times in narrow square wave mode test. Table S3. Voltage in 1 A/cm2 and 3 A/cm2 at different times in wide square wave mode test. Table S4. Voltage at different times in Simulating solar fluctuation test.

Author Contributions

Methodology, P.L.; Software, P.L.; Validation, C.L.; Investigation, Z.S.; Data curation, Z.S.; Writing—original draft, Z.S.; Writing—review & editing, J.L.; Project administration, C.L.; Funding acquisition, J.L. and C.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, 51971211, 52071313), the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of CAS (2017483), the HFIPS Director’s Fund (YZJJ202102, YZJJKX202202, YZJJ-GGZX-2022-01), and the Plan for Anhui Major Provincial Science & Technology Project (Grants 2021d05050006).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ziegler, M.S.; Mueller, J.M.; Pereira, G.D.; Song, J.; Ferrara, M.; Chiang, Y.-M.; Trancik, J.E. Storage Requirements and Costs of Shaping Renewable Energy Toward Grid Decarbonization. Joule 2019, 3, 2134–2153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Carmo, M.; Fritz, D.L.; Mergel, J.; Stolten, D. A comprehensive review on PEM water electrolysis. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2013, 38, 4901–4934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kojima, H.; Nagasawa, K.; Todoroki, N.; Ito, Y.; Matsui, T.; Nakajima, R. Influence of renewable energy power fluctuations on water electrolysis for green hydrogen production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 4572–4593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Moradi Nafchi, F.; Baniasadi, E.; Afshari, E.; Javani, N. Performance assessment of a solar hydrogen and electricity production plant using high temperature PEM electrolyzer and energy storage. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2018, 43, 5820–5831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Makhsoos, A.; Kandidayeni, M.; Pollet, B.G.; Boulon, L. A perspective on increasing the efficiency of proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers–a review. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2023, 48, 15341–15370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Schnuelle, C.; Wassermann, T.; Fuhrlaender, D.; Zondervan, E. Dynamic hydrogen production from PV & wind direct electricity supply–Modeling and techno-economic assessment. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 29938–29952. [Google Scholar]
  7. Frensch, S.H.; Serre, G.; Fouda-Onana, F.; Jensen, H.C.; Christensen, M.L.; Araya, S.S.; Kær, S.K. Impact of iron and hydrogen peroxide on membrane degradation for polymer electrolyte membrane water electrolysis: Computational and experimental investigation on fluoride emission. J. Power Sources 2019, 420, 54–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Alia, S.M.; Rasimick, B.; Ngo, C.; Neyerlin, K.; Kocha, S.S.; Pylypenko, S.; Xu, H.; Pivovar, B.S. Activity and durability of iridium nanoparticles in the oxygen evolution reaction. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2016, 163, F3105–F3112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gago, A.S.; Ansar, A.S.; Gazdzicki, P.; Wagner, N.; Arnold, J.; Friedrich, K.A. Low cost bipolar plates for large scale PEM electrolyzers. ECS Trans. 2014, 64, 1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wong, K.H.; Kjeang, E.J.C. Mitigation of chemical membrane degradation in fuel cells: Understanding the effect of cell voltage and iron ion redox cycle. ChemSusChem 2015, 8, 1072–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fonseca, C.; Barbosa, M.J.C.S. Corrosion behaviour of titanium in biofluids containing H2O2 studied by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Corros. Sci. 2001, 43, 547–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cherevko, S.; Geiger, S.; Kasian, O.; Mingers, A.; Mayrhofer, K.J. Oxygen evolution activity and stability of iridium in acidic media. Part 2.–Electrochemically grown hydrous iridium oxide. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2016, 774, 102–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lettenmeier, P.; Wang, R.; Abouatallah, R.; Helmly, S.; Morawietz, T.; Hiesgen, R.; Kolb, S.; Burggraf, F.; Kallo, J.; Gago, A. Durable membrane electrode assemblies for proton exchange membrane electrolyzer systems operating at high current densities. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 210, 502–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Scohy, M.; Abbou, S.; Martin, V.; Gilles, B.; Sibert, E.; Dubau, L.; Maillard, F. Probing surface oxide formation and dissolution on/of Ir single crystals via X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 9859–9869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Martin, A.; Trinke, P.; Stähler, M.; Stähler, A.; Scheepers, F.; Bensmann, B.; Carmo, M.; Lehnert, W.; Hanke-Rauschenbach, R. The Effect of Cell Compression and Cathode Pressure on Hydrogen Crossover in PEM Water Electrolysis. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2022, 169, 014502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Feng, Q.; Yuan, X.Z.; Liu, G.; Wei, B.; Zhang, Z.; Li, H.; Wang, H. A review of proton exchange membrane water electrolysis on degradation mechanisms and mitigation strategies. J. Power Sources 2017, 366, 33–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pham, C.V.; Escalera-López, D.; Mayrhofer, K.; Cherevko, S.; Thiele, S. Essentials of High Performance Water Electrolyzers–From Catalyst Layer Materials to Electrode Engineering. Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11, 2101998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Siracusano, S.; Hodnik, N.; Jovanovic, P.; Ruiz-Zepeda, F.; Šala, M.; Baglio, V.; Aricò, A.S. New insights into the stability of a high performance nanostructured catalyst for sustainable water electrolysis. Nano Energy 2017, 40, 618–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chandesris, M.; Medeau, V.; Guillet, N.; Chelghoum, S.; Thoby, D.; Fouda-Onana, F. Membrane degradation in PEM water electrolyzer: Numerical modeling and experimental evidence of the influence of temperature and current density. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2015, 40, 1353–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xiuying, G.; Xianming, L.; Zhuang, X.; Guangli, H.; Ping, M. Cost analysis of hydrogen production by electrolysis of renewable energy. Energy Storage Sci. Technol. 2020, 9, 688. [Google Scholar]
  21. Li, N.; Araya, S.S.; Kær, S.K. Investigating low and high load cycling tests as accelerated stress tests for proton exchange membrane water electrolysis. Electrochim. Acta 2021, 370, 137748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rakousky, C.; Reimer, U.; Wippermann, K.; Carmo, M.; Lueke, W.; Stolten, D. An analysis of degradation phenomena in polymer electrolyte membrane water electrolysis. J. Power Sources 2016, 326, 120–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Siracusano, S.; Trocino, S.; Briguglio, N.; Pantò, F.; Aricò, A.S. Analysis of performance degradation during steady-state and load-thermal cycles of proton exchange membrane water electrolysis cells. J. Power Sources 2020, 468, 228390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fouda-Onana, F.; Chandesris, M.; Médeau, V.; Chelghoum, S.; Thoby, D.; Guillet, N. Investigation on the degradation of MEAs for PEM water electrolysers part I: Effects of testing conditions on MEA performances and membrane properties. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2016, 41, 16627–16636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rakousky, C.; Reimer, U.; Wippermann, K.; Kuhri, S.; Carmo, M.; Lueke, W.; Stolten, D. Polymer electrolyte membrane water electrolysis: Restraining degradation in the presence of fluctuating power. J. Power Sources 2017, 342, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Frensch, S.H.; Fouda-Onana, F.; Serre, G.; Thoby, D.; Araya, S.S.; Kær, S.K. Influence of the operation mode on PEM water electrolysis degradation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 29889–29898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Babic, U.; Tarik, M.; Schmidt, T.J.; Gubler, L. Understanding the effects of material properties and operating conditions on component aging in polymer electrolyte water electrolyzers. J. Power Sources 2020, 451, 227778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Alia, S.M.; Stariha, S.; Borup, R.L. Electrolyzer Durability at Low Catalyst Loading and with Dynamic Operation. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2019, 166, F1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Böhm, D.; Beetz, M.; Gebauer, C.; Bernt, M.; Schröter, J.; Kornherr, M.; Zoller, F.; Bein, T.; Fattakhova-Rohlfing, D. Highly conductive titania supported iridium oxide nanoparticles with low overall iridium density as OER catalyst for large-scale PEM electrolysis. Appl. Mater. Today 2021, 24, 101134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Aßmann, P.; Gago, A.S.; Gazdzicki, P.; Friedrich, K.A.; Wark, M. Toward developing accelerated stress tests for proton exchange membrane electrolyzers. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2020, 21, 225–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ayers, K.E.; Anderson, E.B.; Capuano, C.; Carter, B.; Dalton, L.; Hanlon, G.; Manco, J.; Niedzwiecki, M. Research Advances towards Low Cost, High Efficiency PEM Electrolysis. ECS Trans. 2010, 33, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Shiva Kumar, S.; Himabindu, V. Hydrogen production by PEM water electrolysis–A review. Mater. Sci. Energy Technol. 2019, 2, 442–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Alia, S.M.; Reeves, K.S.; Baxter, J.S.; Cullen, D.A. The Impact of Ink and Spray Variables on Catalyst Layer Properties, Electrolyzer Performance, and Electrolyzer Durability. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2020, 167, 144512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Alia, S.M.; Reeves, K.S.; Yu, H.; Park, J.; Kariuki, N.; Kropf, A.J.; Myers, D.J.; Cullen, D.A. Electrolyzer Performance Loss from Accelerated Stress Tests and Corresponding Changes to Catalyst Layers and Interfaces. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2022, 169, 054517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yuan, X.-Z.; Shaigan, N.; Song, C.; Aujla, M.; Neburchilov, V.; Kwan, J.T.H.; Wilkinson, D.P.; Bazylak, A.; Fatih, K. The porous transport layer in proton exchange membrane water electrolysis: Perspectives on a complex component. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2022, 6, 1824–1853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kulkarni, D.; Huynh, A.; Satjaritanun, P.; O’Brien, M.; Shimpalee, S.; Parkinson, D.; Shevchenko, P.; DeCarlo, F.; Danilovic, N.; Ayers, K.E.; et al. Elucidating effects of catalyst loadings and porous transport layer morphologies on operation of proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2022, 308, 121213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Barsoukov, E.; Macdonald, J.R. Impedance Spectroscopy: Theory, Experiment, and Applications; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  38. Damjanovic, A. Electron transfer through thin anodic films in oxygen evolution at Pt electrodes in alkaline solutions. Electrochim. Acta 1992, 37, 2533–2539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Siracusano, S.; Trocino, S.; Briguglio, N.; Baglio, V.; Aricò, A.S. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy as a diagnostic tool in polymer electrolyte membrane electrolysis. Materials 2018, 11, 1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Moya, A.A. Electrochemical Impedance of Ion-Exchange Membranes with Interfacial Charge Transfer Resistances. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 6543–6552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cai, X.; Lin, R.; Xu, J.; Lu, Y. Construction and analysis of photovoltaic directly coupled conditions in PEM electrolyzer. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 6494–6507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 17 01331 g001
Figure 1. The AST waveforms used in this investigation. (a) The 1, 2, and 3 A/cm2 constant-current density mode tests. (b) Narrow square-wave mode test with fluctuations in the range of 1–2 A/cm2. (c) Wide square-wave mode test with fluctuations in the range of 1–3 A/cm2. (d) Simulating solar PV fluctuation mode within a current density range of 0–3 A/cm2.
Figure 1. The AST waveforms used in this investigation. (a) The 1, 2, and 3 A/cm2 constant-current density mode tests. (b) Narrow square-wave mode test with fluctuations in the range of 1–2 A/cm2. (c) Wide square-wave mode test with fluctuations in the range of 1–3 A/cm2. (d) Simulating solar PV fluctuation mode within a current density range of 0–3 A/cm2.
Materials 17 01331 g001
Materials 17 01331 g002
Figure 2. (a) Voltage change at different constant-current density, and the slope of the fitted line represents average degradation rate. (b) The relationship between degradation rate and step time in narrow and wide square-wave tests. (c) Voltage rise in solar at different current densities.
Figure 2. (a) Voltage change at different constant-current density, and the slope of the fitted line represents average degradation rate. (b) The relationship between degradation rate and step time in narrow and wide square-wave tests. (c) Voltage rise in solar at different current densities.
Materials 17 01331 g002
Materials 17 01331 g003
Figure 3. C3′s (a) polarization curves at different times, (b) EIS over time, and (c) CV plots changes before and after AST.
Figure 3. C3′s (a) polarization curves at different times, (b) EIS over time, and (c) CV plots changes before and after AST.
Materials 17 01331 g003
Materials 17 01331 g004
Figure 4. Average degradation rate at 1 A/cm2 and 3 A/cm2 for (a) W02, (b) W12, and (c) W22 with time in wide square mode. (d) Comparison of the degradation of three ASTs at 1 A/cm2 in wide square-wave mode.
Figure 4. Average degradation rate at 1 A/cm2 and 3 A/cm2 for (a) W02, (b) W12, and (c) W22 with time in wide square mode. (d) Comparison of the degradation of three ASTs at 1 A/cm2 in wide square-wave mode.
Materials 17 01331 g004
Materials 17 01331 g005
Figure 5. (a) Equivalent circuit model [40] and (b) EIS measured at different current densities.
Figure 5. (a) Equivalent circuit model [40] and (b) EIS measured at different current densities.
Materials 17 01331 g005
Materials 17 01331 g006
Figure 6. Percentage change rate in HFR over time for (a) constant-current mode, (b) narrow square-wave mode, (c) wide square-wave mode, and (d) solar.
Figure 6. Percentage change rate in HFR over time for (a) constant-current mode, (b) narrow square-wave mode, (c) wide square-wave mode, and (d) solar.
Materials 17 01331 g006
Materials 17 01331 g007
Figure 7. Separation of the impact of ohmic resistance on the voltage degradation rate at 2.0 A/cm2. The total degradation rate was extracted from IV curves at different times.
Figure 7. Separation of the impact of ohmic resistance on the voltage degradation rate at 2.0 A/cm2. The total degradation rate was extracted from IV curves at different times.
Materials 17 01331 g007
Table 1. Investigated operation modes. Each AST was kept running under the same test conditions for 600 h, except the solar PV profile which was running for 1430 h.
Table 1. Investigated operation modes. Each AST was kept running under the same test conditions for 600 h, except the solar PV profile which was running for 1430 h.
Operation ModeTest ConditionMode of Change (Name)
Constant current600 h, 80 °C1 A/cm2 (C1)
2 A/cm2 (C2)
3 A/cm2 (C3)
Narrow square wave1~2 A/cm2
28 s dwell time
600 h, 80 °C		2 s step time (N02)
12 s step time (N12)
22 s step time (N22)
Wide square wave1~3 A/cm2
28 s dwell time
600 h, 80 °C		2 s step time (W02)
12 s step time (W12)
22 s step time (W22)
Solar photovoltaic mode0~3 A/cm2
1540 h, 80 °C		Simulating fluctuation (Solar)
Table 2. Degradation rate analyses for different ASTs used in this investigation.
Table 2. Degradation rate analyses for different ASTs used in this investigation.
Test ModeASTDegradation RateImpact on Degradation
Constant-current modeC122. 7 μV/h @ 1 A/cm2High current density would accelerate degradation.
C226.1 μV/h @ 2 A/cm2
C350.0 μV/h @ 3 A/cm2
Narrow square-wave mode
(1–2 A/cm2)		N0232.5 μV/h @ 1 A/cm2
47.3 μV/h @ 2 A/cm2		Fluctuates in the range of 1–2 A/cm2, decreasing step time of current would accelerate degradation.
N1227.1 μV/h @ 1 A/cm2
36.6 μV/h @ 2 A/cm2
N2221.7 μV/h @ 1 A/cm2
24.9 μV/h @ 2 A/cm2
Wide square-wave mode (1–3 A/cm2)W0227.9 μV/h @ 1 A/cm2
46.2 μV/h @ 3 A/cm2		Fluctuates in the range of 1–3 A/cm2, increasing step time of current would accelerate degradation, but there seems to be an upper limit.
W1229.8 μV/h @ 1 A/cm2
52.7 μV/h @ 3 A/cm2
W2236.7 μV/h @ 1 A/cm2
52.8 μV/h @ 3 A/cm2
Simulating solar modeSolar39.7 μV/h @ 1 A/cm2
52.4 μV/h @ 2 A/cm2
87.7 μV/h @ 3 A/cm2		Near 2–3 A/cm2, increasing step time, the maximum degradation rate occurs.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Su, Z.; Liu, J.; Li, P.; Liang, C. Study of the Durability of Membrane Electrode Assemblies in Various Accelerated Stress Tests for Proton-Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysis. Materials 2024, 17, 1331. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17061331

AMA Style

Su Z, Liu J, Li P, Liang C. Study of the Durability of Membrane Electrode Assemblies in Various Accelerated Stress Tests for Proton-Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysis. Materials. 2024; 17(6):1331. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17061331

Chicago/Turabian Style

Su, Zhengquan, Jun Liu, Pengfei Li, and Changhao Liang. 2024. "Study of the Durability of Membrane Electrode Assemblies in Various Accelerated Stress Tests for Proton-Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysis" Materials 17, no. 6: 1331. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17061331

APA Style

Su, Z., Liu, J., Li, P., & Liang, C. (2024). Study of the Durability of Membrane Electrode Assemblies in Various Accelerated Stress Tests for Proton-Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysis. Materials, 17(6), 1331. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17061331

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop