Next Article in Journal
Charge Trapping and Emission Properties in CAAC-IGZO Transistor: A First-Principles Calculations
Previous Article in Journal
Rheological Behavior of the A356 Alloy in the Semisolid State at Low Shear Rates
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Synergistic Effects of Ultrafine Slag Powder and Limestone on the Rheology Behavior, Microstructure, and Fractal Features of Ultra-High Performance Concrete (UHPC)

1
Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Preparation and Measurement of Building Materials, University of Jinan, Jinan 250022, China
2
School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Jinan, Jinan 250022, China
3
School of Civil and Architectural Engineering, University of Jinan, Jinan 250022, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(6), 2281; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16062281
Submission received: 17 January 2023 / Revised: 23 February 2023 / Accepted: 10 March 2023 / Published: 12 March 2023

Abstract

:
This study investigated the effect of the interaction between ultrafine slag powder (USL) and limestone (LS) on the rheology behavior, microstructure, and fractal features of UHPC. The results indicated that B2 with mass ratio of 2:1 between the USL and LS obtained the highest compressive strength and the lowest yield stress. The combination of the USL and LS facilitated the cement hydration, ettringite, and monocarboaluminate (Mc) formation, as well as the increase in the polymerization of the C–S–H. The synergistic action between the USL and LS refined the pore structure due to the formation of the Mc, compensating for the consumption of the CH by the pozzolanic reaction, which provided a denser microstructure in the UHPC. The fractal dimension (Ds) of the UHPC was strongly related to the concrete pore structures and the compressive strength, which demonstrated that a new metric called the Ds value may be used to assess the synergistic effect of the UHPC.

1. Introduction

UHPC is regarded as the most promising cementitious material in the concrete industry [1]. However, the large amount of cementitious material required for the preparation of UHPC has increased global carbon dioxide emissions [2,3]. There is a high potential to reduce the use of a cement clinker and CO2 emissions by adding supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs). Furthermore, incorporating a proper proportion of SCMs in the cement can improve the workability and increased the strength and the durability of the concrete [4,5].
Limestone (LS) powder with an environmental impact has been used in cement-based materials for a long time [2]. The effects of LS on the performance of the concrete, including the workability [6], strength [7,8], dimensional stability [9], and durability [10,11], have been investigated. It is well known that LS promoted the precipitation of the C–S–H and accelerated the clinker hydration [4]. However, LS also reacted with the alumina of the SCMs and showed a positive synergistic effect [12]. The calcite offered from LS reacted with the alumina to form a hemi-carboaluminate (Hc) and monocarboaluminate (Mc) phase, which increased the total volume of the hydration products and blocked the tiny pores, thus refining the pore structures and enhancing the compressive strength. Suhua Ma et al. [2] and Antoni et al. [13] indicated that incorporating metakaolin (MK) and LS significantly refined the pore structure and increased the compressive strength due to the stimulation of the C3S hydration and the ettringite stabilization. Adu-Amankwah et al. [14] demonstrated that there were synergistic effects between LS and the slag. The nucleation effects of LS enhanced the cement hydration and increased the aluminum concentration in the pore solution, which improved the slag hydration. However, Axel Schöler et al. [15] reported the actual reaction content of Al2O3 in the slag with LS was very low due to the lower activity of the slag, which limited the formation of the Hc and Mc in the concrete.
In contrast to the normal ground granulated blast furnace slag, ultrafine slag powder (USL) had an increased surface area, activity index, and an amorphous form of particles [16], which increased both the hydration rates and the number of pozzolanic reactions and improved its reaction chances with LS [17]. Herein, it is interesting to explore the synergistic action of the USL and LS on the UHPC. Furthermore, the synergistic action between the USL and LS on the rheological behaviors of the UHPC has few reports. Moreover, the USL possessed a higher pozzolanic reaction and a finer particle distribution, which not only affected the rheological properties and influenced the formation and change of the pore structure of the UHPC, but also increased the probability of the reaction with the limestone powder. The USL and LS compounded the ternary cement-based systems and posed a better potential for influencing the pore structure of the UHPC in various ways, including the filling effect, pozzolanic reactions, nucleation effect, and so on, which resulted in a pore structure or pore size distribution of the concrete that was highly complex with irregular features. It was incomplete to evaluate the effect of the synergistic action of the USL and LS on the pore structure of the UHPC using the porosity. To deeply understand the synergistic action on the microstructures of the UHPC, fractal geometry provided an effective way to investigate the complexity and heterogeneity of the microstructures of the UHPC, which also linked the macroscopic performance of the UHPC to their microscopic characteristics [18,19,20]. The complex and irregular pore structure was quantified by the fractal dimension (Ds) values [21,22,23]. The Ds has been proven to be closely associated with the compressive strength, which was revealed by Jin et al. [24] and Wang et al. [20]. The most direct manifestation of the USL and LS synergistic action in the UHPC is to obtain a denser microstructure and a high compressive strength of the hardened concrete.
However, using the fractal theory to study the synergistic action of the USL and LS on the performance of the UHPC is limited. Hence, the target of this study is to explore the effect on the microstructure and the properties of the UHPC containing the USL and LS and to better understand this synergy effect. The rheological properties and workability of the UHPC incorporating the various ratios of the USL and LS were first investigated. After that, the phase development of the paste was assessed using the X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis. Additionally, the microstructure morphology and evolution were obtained using SEM and MIP, respectively. Furthermore, the final target is to use the fractal theory to better understand the synergistic action of the USL and LS on the performance of the UHPC.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

The ordinary Portland cement (P·O 52.5, from Shanshui Cement Co., Ltd., Shandong Province, China), ultrafine slag powder (USL, from the building material market and after grinding), and limestone (LS, from the Gongyi Yuan Heng water purification material factory in Henan Province, China) were used in this study. Their compositions are listed in Table 1. The polycarboxylate superplasticizer (SP) and straight steel fibers were used in this study. The particle size distribution, XRD patterns, and SEM for all raw materials were presented in Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3, respectively. The median particle sizes of P·O 52.5, USL, and LS were 10.89 μm, 4.307 μm, and 13.50 μm, respectively. The USL had a finest distribution than the LS and P·O 52.5, and the LS obtained the coarsest distribution. The amorphous phase was observed in the USL and visible peaks of calcium carbonate were observed in LS. Figure 3 shows the SEM pictures of the USL and LS particles. As can be seen in Figure 3, the limestone was mostly cubic or elongated, with sharp angles. The superfine slag powder had smaller, flaky, or plate shaped particles.

2.2. Sample Preparation

In this study, the water-to-binder and sand-to-cement ratios were fixed at 0.18 and 1, respectively. Mixtures with 2% steel fibers and different contents of the USL and LS were introduced to the UHPC mixtures, as summarized in Table 2. A superplasticizer (SP) was used to adjust the workability of the UHPC mixture, and its dosage was fixed at 1.5% by a mass of binders. The binder materials were mixed for 3 min, and thus the mixing solution (including water and the superplasticizer) was added. Continue to mix at low speed until the mixture became a paste, followed by rapid mixing for 3 min. Finally, the sand and fiber were added gradually at a low speed and then stirred at high speed for 3 min. Then the mixtures were cast into a 40 mm × 40 mm × 160 mm mold and cured in a standard room (Relative humidity > 90%, 20 °C). After demolding, the UHPC was cured in a standard room for testing at 7 d and 28 d. The paste without the steel fiber and sand was prepared to analyze the hydration reaction and microstructure of the UHPC.

2.3. Test Method

The behavior of the rheological was measured by the cement paste. The Malvern rheometer was equipped with an automatic temperature control device and the shear rate control protocol is shown in Figure 4. To eliminate the thixotropy, the slurry was pre-sheared for 20 s and stabilized for 20 s, before undergoing the falling stages, which lasted for 200 s. The experimental temperature remained constant at 20 °C [25]. After it was vibrated 25 times, the mean diameter of the mortar was considered as the flowability, according to standard Chinese GB/T2419-2005. The compressive strength result of the mortar was obtained from six specimens with the loading rate of 2.4 kN/s. The fragment of the paste was ground into powder for XRD and 29Si NMR spectroscopy on the designated test day. After passing through a 200-mesh sieve, the powder was heated and dried to a constant weight at 60 °C under a vacuum drying oven.
The powder was pressed into thin sheets for the XRD test, which was performed at 0.2 s per step from 5° to 60° with the CuKα radiation at 40 kV and 40 mA. The SEM observed microstructure of the paste contained the USL or LS. MIP evaluated the pore structure of the paste. The solid-state 29Si NMR spectra were obtained from the AVANCE III HD 600 MHz NMR spectrometer at 9.4 T and 79.4 MHz in the magnetic field intensity and magnetic field frequency, respectively.
The fractal features of the concrete pore structure was evaluated using Zhang’s model [20,26]. There is a logarithmic law between the cumulative intrusion work (Wn) and the total amount of pores (Vn) injected with mercury [27]. The calculation formula was
l n ( W n γ n 2 ) = D s l n V n 1 3 r n + l n C
where rn is the smallest pore radius, m; C is a regression constant; and Ds is the pore surface fractal dimension.
Wn is calculated using Formula (2).
w n = i = 1 n p i Δ v i
where p i represents the pressure at the ⅈth injection of mercury, Pa; v i means the volume of the ⅈth injection of mercury, m3; and n stands for the amount of mercury injected.

3. Result and Discussion

3.1. Rheological Properties

The rheological behavior of the UHPC pastes with the different USL or LS content is shown in Figure 5A. For the pure cement paste (Ref), the shear stress increased rapidly with the increasing shear rate, which was typical for swelling fluids. Compared to the Ref, the fluid types of the rheology curves containing the USL or LS remained consistent, which illustrated that the non-linear Herschel–Bulkley (3) model was suitable to fit the non-linear flow conjunction between the shear stress and shear rate, and the parameters are shown in Table 3.
τ = τ0 + kγn
where τ0 represents the yield stress, k represents the correction parameter, and n represents the paste’s fluid flow index. The fluid flow index n-value of all the mixtures was higher than 1.0, demonstrating that the pastes’ rheological flow curve obtained a shear-thickening response [28,29]. It was further proven that the slurry presented a shear-thickening response, and the apparent viscosity changes are shown in Figure 5B. The viscosity increased continuously with the shear rate, which was consistent with the response of n > 1 [30,31]. From Figure 5 and Table 3, the n-values varied between 3.667 and 4.975 in this study. The lowest n-value of 3.667 and the yield stress of 20.822 Pa were obtained from B2 with 20% USL and 10% LS. Furthermore, the USL30 and B6 received the highest n-value of 4.975 and the highest yield stress of 47.204 Pa. At 30% total cement substitution, the yield stress and n-values of the pastes were high, whether LS or the USL replaced the cement. Still, the appropriate ratio of LS to the USL in the mixtures significantly reduced the yield stress and n-values. Since the average particle size of the USL was smaller than that of the cement particles and the average particle size of LS was more extensive than that of the cement particles, their addition improved the distribution of the total cement-based particles. Incorporating 20% USL and 10% LS in the cement, the USL filled the particle space, released the trapped water, and incremented the free water content. The large LS particle extended the skeleton space of the paste, the cement particles filled the particle space of the skeleton space of the LS, and the USL particles filled the space between the cement particles, leading to a decrease in the shear thickening and the yield stress [32,33]. Increasing the USL content increased the adsorption of the water reducing agent and its agglomeration effect, which maintained the positive impact imposed by the increase in free water and influenced the degree of shear thickening [34]. Moreover, when 30% of the cement was replaced by LS, the LS particles increased the skeleton space of the paste, which needed more cement paste to fill and resulted in smaller spaces not being filled [35]. At this time, the disordered arrangement of the particles increased the yield stress of the paste. Consequently, the plastic viscosity could not be given due to the non-linear relationship between the shear stresses and the shear rates. However, the plastic viscosity can been calculated using the De Larrard Equation (4) [36,37]:
u = 3 k n + 2 γ m a x n 1
where u presets the plastic viscosity and γ m a x is the maximum shear strain rate achieved in the test. According to Table 3, B2 obtained the lowest plastic viscosity, which was consistent with the above analysis. The reasonable particle gradation reduced the yield stress and plastic viscosity.

3.2. Flowability

Figure 6A illustrates that the slump flowability of the UHPC containing 20% USL and 10% LS (B2) showed a higher fluidity than USL30, B6, and the Ref. B2 obtained the maximum slump flowability of 245 mm, which increased by 48.8%, 32.4%, and 44.1% compared to the Ref, USL30, and B6, respectively. The USL filled the particle space, released the trapped water, and incremented the free water content. The large LS particle extended the skeleton space of the paste, leading to the decrease in the yield stress and the frictional resistance, which improved the mixture flowability [38,39]. The appropriate ratio of LS to the USL in the mixtures significantly reduced the yield stress and enhanced the flowability, which was also why B2 obtained the highest flowability. The synergistic effect of the USL and LS increased the flowability of the UHPC. In order to further characterize the influence of the yield stress on the slump flow of the UHPC, the corresponding relation between them is shown in Figure 6B. On the whole, the yield stress had a negatively correlation with the slump flow. A high yield stress hindered the fluidity of the UHPC mixture.

3.3. Compressive Strength

Figure 7 illustrates the changes in the compressive strength of the UHPC containing the USL or LS. The compressive strength of the UHPC at 7 d obtained a similar trend of a compressive strength change at 28 d, which was increased first and then decreased with an increase in the LS. With 20% USL and 10% LS, B2 obtained the highest compressive strength of 103.7 MPa and 146.3 MPa at 7 d and 28 d, respectively. The compressive strength of B2 at 28d increased by 11.1%, 4.4%, and 11.2% compared to the Ref, USL30, and B6, respectively, which illustrated that the appropriate ratio of LS to the USL in the UHPC not only improved the flowability of the mixture but also enhanced the compressive strength of the UHPC. The large LS particle extended the skeleton space of the paste, the cement particles filled the particle space of the skeleton space of the LS, and the USL particles filled the space between the cement particles. The rational particle distribution in the ternary cement blends containing the USL and LS increased the free water and released part of the entrapped air, which enhanced the hydration of the cement and decreased the porosity, leading to an increase in the compressive strength [10,40]. In addition, the low water ratio and high alkali environment led to a rupture of the Si–O and Al–O bonds within the USL particles. These fractures promoted the dissolution of the Si and Al ions and accelerated the pozzolanic reaction with calcium hydroxide(CH), which improved the compaction and compressive strength of the UHPC [41,42]. The LS particles reacted with the aluminate phase from the USL and the cement. When the mass percentage of the USL to LS was 20:10, there was a sufficient aluminum phase to react with the LS, which formed the ettringite, Hc, and Mc [2,14,43]. They also attributed a higher strength and illustrated the synergistic action between the USL and LS-enhanced compressive strength.

3.4. XRD Patterns

The XRD patterns of the mixtures hydrated at 1 d, 3 d, and 28 d are illustrated in Figure 8. The CH was clearly observed, while the opposite was true for the C–S–H with a poor crystallinity. The XRD patterns found that the pastes characteristic phase (ettringite (AFt), Hc, and Mc) evolutions varied considerably with the different content of the USL and LS. At 1 d, the CH peak increased with the LS content due to the LS particles providing plenty of nucleation sites and promoting the hydration of the cement and the formation of CH crystals [40]. With the ongoing hydration, the pozzolanic reaction between the USL particles and the CH decreased the CH peak [44]. Apart from providing a nucleation site, the LS reacted with the Al phase released from the USL and the cement, which formed the AFt, Hc, and Mc hydration products. After 1 d of hydration, the USL30 obtained the lowest peak intensity of the AFt, but incorporating LS, this peak intensity increased. B2 achieved a higher peak intensity of AFt than the other ternary blends. A similar pattern was observed in the peak intensity of the Mc compared to the AFt. This result illustrated that the LS promoted the USL and cement hydration and increased the formation of the AFt. Little to no Hc and Mc were observed throughout the hydration of the Ref. The Mc was found in the binary or ternary blends during the whole hydration. The content of the Hc was lower at 1 d, higher at 7 d, and lower at 28 d in the binary or ternary blends, which demonstrated that both the formation and transformation of the Hc to Mc were closely related to the LS during the hydration [43,45]. The little Hc existence in B2 may be related to the restrictions of the carbonate transport ions by the blockage of the pore structure due to the Mc [46,47]. The Mc formation instead of the Hc due to the reaction of the LS compensated for the consumption of the CH by the Hc formation [48], which illustrated that the appropriate ratio of LS to the USL in the pastes improved the density of the concrete and also demonstrated the synergistic effect between the USL and LS.

3.5. Hydration Products

The SEM pictures of the Ref, B2, B6, and USL30 at 1 d and 28 d are shown in Figure 9. After 1 d of hydration, the microstructure of the Ref seemed denser than the other samples due to the dilution effect of the admixtures. Due to the nucleation, few hydration products can be seen on the surface of the USL and LS particles. After curing for 28 d, the microstructure of the paste was denser. Especially in B2, the USL and LS acted as fillers to increase the density of the paste and produced plenty of hydration products to fill the pore structure. Moreover, the USL and LS particles were covered by the hydration products. In B6 and USL30, a relatively loose space was observed, and relatively small amounts of the hydration products were found around the USL or LS particles.
The backscattered electron (BSE) microscope pictures of the Ref, B2, B6, and USL30 pastes at 28 d are compared and shown in Figure 10. The brighter parts of the picture were the non-hydrated cement particles, the grey particles were LS, the fine fragmented particles were the USL, and the black particles were the pores inside the paste. The remaining part was a mixture of the hydration products of the C–S–H with a similar grey level. As can be seen, except for some minor pores caused by the entrapped air, the UHPC paste was very dense. Incorporating the USL or LS in the UHPC reduced the cement content, decreased the number of pores, and improved the density of the paste. The synergistic effect of the appropriate proportions between the USL and LS achieved a good particle packing and attributed a higher strength.

3.6. Structure of the C–S–H

To explore the synergistic action between the USL and LS on the C–S–H structure in the UHPC paste, 29Si NMR was supplied. The quantitative results of the NMR signals were calculated and fitted, as shown in Figure 11 and Table 4. According to the experimental and simulated spectra of the UHPC paste, the Q0 signal corresponding to the clinker minerals in the samples containing the USL or LS exhibited a slight drop and a leftward shift compared to the Ref [49]. Meanwhile, the Q1 and Q2 represented a silicate tetrahedra, which appeared in the end and middle of the C–S–H chain, respectively [50]. Q2(1Al) denoted that an Si atom in the C–S–H chain was replaced by an Al atom [51], which changed the aluminum to silicon (Al/Si) ratio. In addition, the mean silicate tetrahedra chain length (MCL) was also influenced by the substitution of Al atoms. The MCL and Al/Si were obtained by calculating the relative areas of the individual after the peak fitting. They C–S–H structures were determined using Equations (5) and (6) [49,52]:
A l / S i = 1 2 Q 2 1 A l Q 1 + Q 2 0 A l + Q 2 1 A l
M C l = 2 Q 1 + Q 2 0 A l + 3 2 Q 2 1 A l Q 1
where Q(n) represents the relative areas of Q(n) in the UHPC paste.
According to Table 4, compared to the Ref, the MCL of USL30, B2, B4, and B6 increased to 5.80, 6.34, 5.89, and 5.68, respectively. Meanwhile, the Al/SI of USL30, B2, B4, and B6 increased to 0.196, 0.182, 0.167, and 0.140, respectively. Incorporating the USL or LS increased the MCL, and the Al/Si may be related to the two factors. On the one hand, the amorphous silicon oxide and aluminum oxide of the USL were corroded in high alkaline environments due to the pozzolanic reaction, which led to high levels of silicon oxide and aluminum oxide being released from the glassy phases and participating in the pozzolanic reaction. Those free Si and Al ions increased the polymerization and MCL of the C–S–H and Al/Si ratio. Furthermore, the high Al content in the USL increased the probability that the Al would be inserted into the silicate chain segments and replace the Si in the C–S–H chain, which enhanced the polymerization of the C–S–H. The Q2(1Al) and MCL in B2 were higher and more substantial than the other pastes, which illustrated that the USL reacted with the CH and formed a large number of C–S–Hs and enhanced the polymerization of the C–S–H [53]. High levels of silicon oxide and aluminum oxide were released from the USL and LS and reacted with the Al phases, forming the Mc, which consumed the Al ions and decreased the Al ions concentration, promoting the further USL hydration. This demonstrated that the synergistic effect of the USL and LS increased the MCL and polymerization degree of the C–S–H. The quantity of literature has shown that longer MCLs were often accompanied by higher compressive strengths [52,54]. The hypothesis supported that the longest MCL in B2 may result in enhancing the higher compressive strengths of the UHPC.

3.7. Pore Structure

The effect of the USL or LS on the pore size distribution and total porosity of the UHPC is shown in Figure 12. According to Figure 12, incorporating the USL or LS in the UHPC decreased the total porosity of the paste and led to the peak of the size distribution dropping and shifting left. More details of the pore characteristic parameters are illustrated in Table 5. The total porosity of USL30, B1, B2, and B6 were 7.25%, 6.47%, 7.33%, and 7.69%, which decreased by 7.4%, 17.4%, 6.4%, and 1.8%, respectively, compared to the Ref. B2 obtained the lowest porosity and the critical diameter of the capillary (CDC) in all the UHPC pastes. This was mainly due to the physical and chemical synergy of the USL and LS. For the physical synergy of the USL and LS, the appropriate proportions filled the large capillary and released the entrapped air, decreasing the CDC and porosity. For the chemical synergy of the USL and LS, the pozzolanic reaction of the USL with the CH formed an additional C–S–H and the reaction of the LS compensated for the consumption of the CH by the Mc formation, which contributed to the increase in the gel pores and refined the pore structures [55]. The physical and chemical synergy of the USL and LS produced a dense microstructure and improved the pore size distribution of the UHPC.

3.8. Pore Surface Fractal Dimension (Ds)

The synergy effect of the USL and LS decreased the porosity of the UHPC and refined the pore structures. Their synergy effect on the complexity and heterogeneity of the pores in the UHPC system cannot be adequately evaluated by the porosity. The fractal dimension was selected to better understand the synergy effect on the pore structures. The Ds values of the UHPC containing the USL or LS at 28 d are shown in Table 6. All the R2 of the UHPC were close to 1, which suggested that the results were credible and accurate. In addition, a Ds value lower than 2 or higher than 3 was meaningless, according to the fractal theories [56,57]. The Ds values of all the UHPC varied between 2.589 and 2.683, which satisfied the calculations of the fractal theory [18,58]. The Ds value of B2 obtained the most considerable value of 2.683 due to the synergy effect of the USL and LS. Plenty of literature demonstrated that the percentage of 3–20 nm pores in the concrete was crucial for determining the resistance to the chloride ion penetration and shrinkage as well as the compressive strength of the concrete [58,59]. The volume fraction with pores less than 20 nm was named V3–20 nm, containing the fractions of the medium capillary and gel pore. Additionally, this relationship between the Ds and the porosity, CDC, V3–20 nm, and compressive strength of the UHPC are shown in Figure 13. According to Figure 13A B, the relationship between the Ds and the porosity and CDC illustrated a negative correlation with high R2 values of 0.988 and 0.966, respectively. For Figure (C) and (D), a similar positive correlation was obtained between the Ds and the V3–20 nm and compressive strength of the UHPC with high R2 values of 0.991 and 0.992, respectively. They demonstrated that the pore structure’s complexity and irregularity could be characterized and represented by the Ds. Furthermore, the Ds maintained a positive correlation with the compressive strength, and more importantly, the synergistic effect resulted in a higher compressive strength of the UHPC, which demonstrated that the Ds parameter remained strongly correlated with the synergistic effect. The pozzolanic reaction and filling effect, as well as the synergistic effect between the USL and LS, refined the pore structures and increased the V3–50 nm of the UHPC, which enhanced the changes in the pore structure complexity and irregularity. Compared to the relationship between the Ds and the pore structure parameters, as well as the compressive strength, the fractal theory can be conducted to understand the synergistic effect between the USL and LS on the properties of the UHPC. Thus, a new metric called the Ds value may be used to assess the synergistic effect of the UHPC.

4. Conclusions

The key observation in this study was the confirmation of the synergetic interaction between LS and the USL on the properties of the UHPC. From the results presented in this paper, the following conclusions can be drawn.
  • The synergistic effect between the USL and LS in the UHPC resulted in a decrease in the yield stress and fluid flow index, and an increase in the workability and compressive strength. Among the different USL to LS mass ratios tested, B2 with a ratio of 2:1 obtained the highest compressive strength, maximum slump flowability, and lowest yield stress.
  • The synergistic interaction between the USL and LS improved the homogeneity of the paste, promoted cement hydration, facilitated the formation of the ettringite and monosulfate phases, and increased the chain length of the calcium-silicate-hydrate (C–S–H) gel. These effects refined the pore structure and led to a denser microstructure in the UHPC.
  • The fractal dimension (Ds) of the ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) was found to be strongly correlated with its pore structure and compressive strength, suggesting that the fractal theory can be used to better understand the synergistic effect between the USL and LS on the properties of the UHPC. Therefore, the Ds value may be used as an indicator to assess the synergistic effect of the USL and LS in the UHPC.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.Z. and Y.H.; methodology, Z.Z. and C.L.; validation, Q.Y., X.L. and X.G.; investigation, C.L. and X.G.; resources, Z.Z. and Y.H.; data curation, X.L. and H.C.; writing—original draft preparation, C.L.; writing—review and editing, J.W. and P.D.; visualization, H.C. and Q.Y.; supervision, Z.Z., P.D. and Y.H.; project administration, J.W.; funding acquisition, Z.Z. and Y.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research work has been made possible thanks to financing from the Natural Science Foundation of China (52002144), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51872120), the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2020QE046), and the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2017YFB0309905).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

USLultrafine slag powder
LSlimestone
UHPCultra-high performance concrete
Mcmonocarboaluminate
Dsfractal dimension
CHportlandite
SCMsupplementary cementitious material
Hchemi-carboaluminate
MKmetakaolin
XRDX-ray diffraction
MIPmercury intrusion porosimeter
SEMscanning electron microscope
C–S–Hcalcium silicate hydrate
MCLthe mean chain length
SPsuperplasticizer
29Si NMR29Si NMR nuclear magnetic resonance
AFtettringite
CDCthe critical diameter of the capillary

References

  1. Shah, H.A.; Yuan, Q.; Photwichai, N. Use of materials to lower the cost of ultra-high-performance concrete—A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 327, 127045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Tang, J.; Wei, S.; Li, W.; Ma, S.; Ji, P.; Shen, X. Synergistic effect of metakaolin and limestone on the hydration properties of Portland cement. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 223, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Maddalena, R.; Roberts, J.J.; Hamilton, A. Can Portland cement be replaced by low-carbon alternative materials? A study on the thermal properties and carbon emissions of innovative cements. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 186, 933–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, D.; Shi, C.; Farzadnia, N.; Shi, Z.; Jia, H.; Ou, Z. A review on use of limestone powder in cement-based materials: Mechanism, hydration and microstructures. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 181, 659–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shirdam, R.; Amini, M.; Bakhshi, N. Investigating the Effects of Copper Slag and Silica Fume on Durability, Strength, and Workability of Concrete. Int. J. Environ. Res. 2019, 13, 909–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Joudi-Bahri, I.; Lecomte, A.; Ouezdou, M.B.; Achour, T. Use of limestone sands and fillers in concrete without superplasticizer. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2012, 34, 771–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yaşar, E.; Erdoğan, Y.; Kılıç, A. Effect of limestone aggregate type and water–cement ratio on concrete strength. Mater. Lett. 2004, 58, 772–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Arora, A.; Sant, G.; Neithalath, N. Ternary blends containing slag and interground/blended limestone: Hydration, strength, and pore structure. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 102, 113–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Aquino, C.; Inoue, M.; Miura, H.; Mizuta, M.; Okamoto, T. The effects of limestone aggregate on concrete properties. Constr. Build. Mater. 2010, 24, 2363–2368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, B.; Wang, J.; Zhou, M. Effect of limestone fines content in manufactured sand on durability of low- and high-strength concretes. Constr. Build. Mater. 2009, 23, 2846–2850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Menadi, B.; Kenai, S.; Khatib, J.; Aït-Mokhtar, A. Strength and durability of concrete incorporating crushed limestone sand. Constr. Build. Mater. 2009, 23, 625–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, Y.; Ling, T.-C.; Wang, M.; Wu, Y.-Y. Synergic performance of low-kaolinite calcined coal gangue blended with limestone in cement mortars. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 300, 124012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Antoni, M.; Rossen, J.; Martirena, F.; Scrivener, K. Cement substitution by a combination of metakaolin and limestone. Cem. Concr. Res. 2012, 42, 1579–1589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Adu-Amankwah, S.; Zajac, M.; Stabler, C.; Lothenbach, B.; Black, L. Influence of limestone on the hydration of ternary slag cements. Cem. Concr. Res. 2017, 100, 96–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Schöler, A.; Lothenbach, B.; Winnefeld, F.; Zajac, M. Hydration of quaternary Portland cement blends containing blast-furnace slag, siliceous fly ash and limestone powder. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2015, 55, 374–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, S.; Li, Q.; Song, J. Study on the grinding kinetics of copper tailing powder. Powder Technol. 2018, 330, 105–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Teng, S.; Lim, T.Y.D.; Sabet Divsholi, B. Durability and mechanical properties of high strength concrete incorporating ultra fine Ground Granulated Blast-furnace Slag. Constr. Build. Mater. 2013, 40, 875–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Luan, C.; Wang, J.; Gao, J.; Wang, J.; Du, P.; Zhou, Z.; Huang, Y.; Du, S. Changes in fractal dimension and durability of ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) with silica fume content. Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 2022, 22, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lü, Q.; Qiu, Q.; Zheng, J.; Wang, J.; Zeng, Q. Fractal dimension of concrete incorporating silica fume and its correlations to pore structure, strength and permeability. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 228, 116986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, L.E.I.; Luo, R.; Zhang, W.E.I.; Jin, M.; Tang, S. Effects of Fineness and Content of Phosphorus Slag on Cement Hydration, Permeability, Pore Structure and Fractal Dimension of Concrete. Fractals 2021, 29, 2140004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, L.; Jin, M.; Wu, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Tang, S. Hydration, shrinkage, pore structure and fractal dimension of silica fume modified low heat Portland cement-based materials. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 272, 121952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tang, S.; Huang, J.; Duan, L.; Yu, P.; Chen, E. A review on fractal footprint of cement-based materials. Powder Technol. 2020, 370, 237–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Li, Y.; Zhang, H.; Huang, M.; Yin, H.; Jiang, K.; Xiao, K.; Tang, S. Influence of Different Alkali Sulfates on the Shrinkage, Hydration, Pore Structure, Fractal Dimension and Microstructure of Low-Heat Portland Cement, Medium-Heat Portland Cement and Ordinary Portland Cement. Fractal Fract. 2021, 5, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jin, S.; Zhang, J.; Han, S. Fractal analysis of relation between strength and pore structure of hardened mortar. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 135, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, X.; Sun, H.; Yang, H.; Mu, R.; Chen, H. Rheological Properties of Nanosilica-Modified Cement Paste at Different Temperatures and Hydration Times. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2021, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, L.; Zhou, J. Fractal characteristics of pore structure of hardened cement paste prepared by pressurized compact molding. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 259, 119856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zeng, Q.; Luo, M.; Pang, X.; Li, L.; Li, K. Surface fractal dimension: An indicator to characterize the microstructure of cement-based porous materials. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013, 282, 302–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chen, M.; Yang, L.; Zheng, Y.; Huang, Y.; Li, L.; Zhao, P.; Wang, S.; Lu, L.; Cheng, X. Yield stress and thixotropy control of 3D-printed calcium sulfoaluminate cement composites with metakaolin related to structural build-up. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 252, 119090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Peng, J.; Deng, D.; Liu, Z.; Yuan, Q.; Ye, T. Rheological models for fresh cement asphalt paste. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 71, 254–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jiao, D.; Shi, C.; Yuan, Q. Time-dependent rheological behavior of cementitious paste under continuous shear mixing. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 226, 591–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhu, J.; Xie, W.; Li, Z.; Liu, J.; Ran, Q.; Li, X.; Tang, J.; Shu, X. An approach to describe the shear-thickening viscosity of cement paste incorporating microfines of manufactured sand. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 340, 127743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rojo-López, G.; González-Fonteboa, B.; Martínez-Abella, F.; González-Taboada, I. Rheology, durability, and mechanical performance of sustainable self-compacting concrete with metakaolin and limestone filler. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2022, 17, e01143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Benaicha, M.; Belcaid, A.; Alaoui, A.H.; Jalbaud, O.; Burtschell, Y. Effects of limestone filler and silica fume on rheology and strength of self-compacting concrete. Struct. Concr. 2019, 20, 1702–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Agostinho, L.B.; Alexandre, d.C.P.; da Silva, E.F.; Toledo Filho, R.D. Rheological study of Portland cement pastes modified with superabsorbent polymer and nanosilica. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 34, 102024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Benjeddou, O.; Soussi, C.; Jedidi, M.; Benali, M. Experimental and theoretical study of the effect of the particle size of limestone fillers on the rheology of self-compacting concrete. J. Build. Eng. 2017, 10, 32–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Khayat, K.H.; Meng, W.; Vallurupalli, K.; Teng, L. Rheological properties of ultra-high-performance concrete—An overview. Cem. Concr. Res. 2019, 124, 105828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Roussel, N.; Spangenberg, J.; Wallevik, J.; Wolfs, R. Numerical simulations of concrete processing: From standard formative casting to additive manufacturing. Cem. Concr. Res. 2020, 135, 106075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, W.G.; Huang, Z.Y.; Zu, T.Y.; Shi, C.J.; Duan, W.H.; Shah, S.P. Influence of Nanolimestone on the Hydration, Mechanical Strength, and Autogenous Shrinkage of Ultrahigh-Performance Concrete. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2016, 28, 04015068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Irassar, E.F. Sulfate attack on cementitious materials containing limestone filler—A review. Cem. Concr. Res. 2009, 39, 241–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Berodier, E.; Scrivener, K.; Scherer, G. Understanding the Filler Effect on the Nucleation and Growth of C-S-H. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2014, 97, 3764–3773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yalçınkaya, Ç.; Yazıcı, H. Effects of ambient temperature and relative humidity on early-age shrinkage of UHPC with high-volume mineral admixtures. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 144, 252–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chang, W.; Zheng, W. Effects of key parameters on fluidity and compressive strength of ultra-high performance concrete. Struct. Concr. 2019, 21, 747–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. De Weerdt, K.; Kjellsen, K.O.; Sellevold, E.; Justnes, H. Synergy between fly ash and limestone powder in ternary cements. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2011, 33, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Prakash, S.; Kumar, S.; Biswas, R.; Rai, B. Influence of silica fume and ground granulated blast furnace slag on the engineering properties of ultra-high-performance concrete. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 2021, 7, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sujjavanich, S.; Suwanvitaya, P.; Chaysuwan, D.; Heness, G. Synergistic effect of metakaolin and fly ash on properties of concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 155, 830–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Moon, J.; Yoon, S.; Wentzcovitch, R.M.; Monteiro, P.J.M. First-principles elasticity of monocarboaluminate hydrates. Am. Mineral. 2014, 99, 1360–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Pillai, R.G.; Gettu, R.; Santhanam, M.; Rengaraju, S.; Dhandapani, Y.; Rathnarajan, S.; Basavaraj, A.S. Service life and life cycle assessment of reinforced concrete systems with limestone calcined clay cement (LC3). Cem. Concr. Res. 2019, 118, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Guo, M.; Gong, G.; Yue, Y.; Xing, F.; Zhou, Y.; Hu, B. Performance evaluation of recycled aggregate concrete incorporating limestone calcined clay cement (LC3). J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 366, 132820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, L.; Jin, M.; Zhou, S.; Tang, S.; Lu, X. Investigation of microstructure of C-S-H and micro-mechanics of cement pastes under NH4NO3 dissolution by 29Si MAS NMR and microhardness. Measurement 2021, 185, 110019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Luan, C.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, Y.; Ren, Z.; Wang, J.; Yuan, L.; Du, S.; Zhou, Z.; Huang, Y. Effects of nano-SiO2, nano-CaCO3 and nano-TiO2 on properties and microstructure of the high content calcium silicate phase cement (HCSC). Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 314, 125377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sun, G.K.; Young, J.F.; Kirkpatrick, R.J. The role of Al in C–S–H: NMR, XRD, and compositional results for precipitated samples. Cem. Concr. Res. 2006, 36, 18–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wang, L.; Guo, F.; Lin, Y.; Yang, H.; Tang, S.W. Comparison between the effects of phosphorous slag and fly ash on the C-S-H structure, long-term hydration heat and volume deformation of cement-based materials. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 250, 118807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. L’Hôpital, E.; Lothenbach, B.; Kulik, D.A.; Scrivener, K. Influence of calcium to silica ratio on aluminium uptake in calcium silicate hydrate. Cem. Concr. Res. 2016, 85, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ma, B.; Li, H.; Li, X.; Mei, J.; Lv, Y. Influence of nano-TiO2 on physical and hydration characteristics of fly ash–cement systems. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 122, 242–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ting, L.; Qiang, W.; Yuqi, Z. Influence of ultra-fine slag and silica fume on properties of high-strength concrete. Mag. Concr. Res. 2020, 72, 610–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wang, L.; Yu, Z.; Liu, B.; Zhao, F.; Tang, S.; Jin, M. Effects of Fly Ash Dosage on Shrinkage, Crack Resistance and Fractal Characteristics of Face Slab Concrete. Fractal Fract. 2022, 6, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zeng, Q.; Li, K.; Fen-Chong, T.; Dangla, P. Surface fractal analysis of pore structure of high-volume fly-ash cement pastes. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2010, 257, 762–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wang, L.; Zhou, S.; Shi, Y.; Huang, Y.; Zhao, F.; Huo, T.; Tang, S. The Influence of Fly Ash Dosages on the Permeability, Pore Structure and Fractal Features of Face Slab Concrete. Fractal Fract. 2022, 6, 476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhang, W.; Hama, Y.; Na, S.H. Drying shrinkage and microstructure characteristics of mortar incorporating ground granulated blast furnace slag and shrinkage reducing admixture. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 93, 267–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Particle distribution of P·O 52.5, USL, and LS.
Figure 1. Particle distribution of P·O 52.5, USL, and LS.
Materials 16 02281 g001
Figure 2. XRD analysis of P.O 52.5, HPS, and LS.
Figure 2. XRD analysis of P.O 52.5, HPS, and LS.
Materials 16 02281 g002
Figure 3. SEM pictures of USL and LS.
Figure 3. SEM pictures of USL and LS.
Materials 16 02281 g003
Figure 4. Malvern rheometer (a) and rheological test protocol (b).
Figure 4. Malvern rheometer (a) and rheological test protocol (b).
Materials 16 02281 g004
Figure 5. Rheology curves of the cement slurry with different USL or LS content. (A) shear stress (B) apparent viscosity.
Figure 5. Rheology curves of the cement slurry with different USL or LS content. (A) shear stress (B) apparent viscosity.
Materials 16 02281 g005
Figure 6. Mini slump flow of the UHPC (A) and the relationship between the mini slump flow and yield stress (B).
Figure 6. Mini slump flow of the UHPC (A) and the relationship between the mini slump flow and yield stress (B).
Materials 16 02281 g006
Figure 7. Changes in the compressive strength of the UHPC containing USL or LS.
Figure 7. Changes in the compressive strength of the UHPC containing USL or LS.
Materials 16 02281 g007
Figure 8. XRD patterns of the blends at 1 d, 3 d, and 28 d.
Figure 8. XRD patterns of the blends at 1 d, 3 d, and 28 d.
Materials 16 02281 g008
Figure 9. SEM pictures of the Ref, B2, B6, and USL30 pastes at 1 d and 28 d.
Figure 9. SEM pictures of the Ref, B2, B6, and USL30 pastes at 1 d and 28 d.
Materials 16 02281 g009
Figure 10. BSE images of the Ref, B2, B6, and USL30 pastes at 28 d.
Figure 10. BSE images of the Ref, B2, B6, and USL30 pastes at 28 d.
Materials 16 02281 g010
Figure 11. 29Si NMR spectra of the Ref, USL30, B2, B4, and B6.
Figure 11. 29Si NMR spectra of the Ref, USL30, B2, B4, and B6.
Materials 16 02281 g011
Figure 12. MIP results with USL or LS at 28 d.
Figure 12. MIP results with USL or LS at 28 d.
Materials 16 02281 g012
Figure 13. Relationship between the Ds and the (A) porosity, (B) CDC, (C) V3–20 nm, and (D) compressive strength of the UHPC.
Figure 13. Relationship between the Ds and the (A) porosity, (B) CDC, (C) V3–20 nm, and (D) compressive strength of the UHPC.
Materials 16 02281 g013
Table 1. Chemical composition of the binders (wt.%).
Table 1. Chemical composition of the binders (wt.%).
Oxide FormulaNa2OMgOAl2O3SiO2P2O5SO3ClK2OCaOTiO2MnOFe2O3LOI
USL0.669.3716.8227.3902.600.070.3236.310.910.370.331.20
LS0.161.111.483.190.060.080.020.2959.4200.071.2240.58
P·O52.50.504.948.0622.890.103.550.110.7352.840.380.132.393.27
Table 2. Mixture proportioning the UHPC mixtures (kg/m3).
Table 2. Mixture proportioning the UHPC mixtures (kg/m3).
P·O 52.5LSUSLWaterSPSandSteel Fiber
Ref11500020717.251150152
USL30805034520717.251150152
B180557.5287.520717.251150152
B280511523020717.251150152
B3805172.5172.520717.251150152
B480523011520717.251150152
B5805287.557.520717.251150152
B6805345020717.251150152
Table 3. Herschel–Bulkley parameters and of the plastic viscosity paste with different LS and USL dosages.
Table 3. Herschel–Bulkley parameters and of the plastic viscosity paste with different LS and USL dosages.
HerschelBulkley ParametersR2Plastic Viscosity
(Pa·s)
τ0/Pakn
Ref29.0677.99 × 10−74.6460.99667.065
USL3030.5888.00 × 10−74.9750.98793.067
B128.8913.71 × 10−74.6390.99703.180
B220.8222.77 × 10−53.6670.99420.0316
B323.6231.08 × 10−53.8860.99650.0326
B424.1492.19 × 10−64.0170.99070.118
B527.8291.019 × 10−64.2160.99170.133
B647.2041.7818 × 10−64.7570.99892.584
Table 4. Deconvolution results for the 29Si NMR spectra (%).
Table 4. Deconvolution results for the 29Si NMR spectra (%).
NO. Q0Q1Q2(1Al)Q2(0Al)Al/SiMCL
RefPeak (ppm)−70.8−78.1−81.0−84.10.1073.25
Area (%)67.1821.536.793.31
USL30Peak (ppm)−71.1−77.7−81.2−85.80.1965.80
Area (%)55.9318.1617.228.69
B2Peak (ppm)−71.2−78.1−81.1−84.40.1826.34
Area (%)57.6415.7915.4111.15
B4Peak (ppm)−71.15−78.2−81.2−84.20.1675.89
Area (%)57.5816.8214.1611.44
B6Peak (ppm)−71.15−77.8−80.5−85.10.1405.68
Area (%)55.8517.7312.4014.03
Table 5. Pore distribution of the UHPC.
Table 5. Pore distribution of the UHPC.
SamplesAverage Pore Diameter (nm)Median Pore Diameter (nm)Critical Diameter of the Capillary
(nm)
Porosity (by Volume) (%)Pore Distribution (%)
By Area MethodBy Volume Method<10 nm10–100 nm>100 nm
Ref20.1619.6317.7612.327.835.5263.6829.8
USL3017.8717.7720.8011.587.256.5186.27.29
B218.117.2521.6310.416.478.4178.2113.38
B422.6321.6225.4911.387.335.6483.4910.87
B623.8020.5925.6512.147.692.5679.8217.62
Table 6. Ds of the UHPC paste at 28 d.
Table 6. Ds of the UHPC paste at 28 d.
No.DsR2
Ref2.5890.996
USL302.6370.994
B22.6830.997
B42.6280.992
B62.5960.989
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Luan, C.; Yang, Q.; Lin, X.; Gao, X.; Cheng, H.; Huang, Y.; Du, P.; Zhou, Z.; Wang, J. The Synergistic Effects of Ultrafine Slag Powder and Limestone on the Rheology Behavior, Microstructure, and Fractal Features of Ultra-High Performance Concrete (UHPC). Materials 2023, 16, 2281. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16062281

AMA Style

Luan C, Yang Q, Lin X, Gao X, Cheng H, Huang Y, Du P, Zhou Z, Wang J. The Synergistic Effects of Ultrafine Slag Powder and Limestone on the Rheology Behavior, Microstructure, and Fractal Features of Ultra-High Performance Concrete (UHPC). Materials. 2023; 16(6):2281. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16062281

Chicago/Turabian Style

Luan, Congqi, Qingchun Yang, Xinru Lin, Xin Gao, Heng Cheng, Yongbo Huang, Peng Du, Zonghui Zhou, and Jinbang Wang. 2023. "The Synergistic Effects of Ultrafine Slag Powder and Limestone on the Rheology Behavior, Microstructure, and Fractal Features of Ultra-High Performance Concrete (UHPC)" Materials 16, no. 6: 2281. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16062281

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop