Next Article in Journal
Sensitivity of Al-Doped Zinc-Oxide Extended Gate Field Effect Transistors to Low-Dose X-ray Radiation
Next Article in Special Issue
Strain-Balanced InAs/AlSb Type-II Superlattice Structures Growth on GaSb Substrate by Molecular Beam Epitaxy
Previous Article in Journal
Process Optimization of the Hot Stamping of AZ31 Magnesium Alloy Sheets Based on Response Surface Methodology
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Epitaxial CdSe/PbSe Heterojunction Growth and MWIR Photovoltaic Detector

by
Lance L. McDowell
*,†,
Milad Rastkar Mirzaei
and
Zhisheng Shi
*
The School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Materials 2023, 16(5), 1866; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16051866
Submission received: 25 January 2023 / Revised: 15 February 2023 / Accepted: 21 February 2023 / Published: 24 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Epitaxial Growth of Semiconductor Materials)

Abstract

:
A novel Epitaxial Cadmium Selenide (CdSe) on Lead Selenide (PbSe) type-II heterojunction photovoltaic detector has been demonstrated by Molecular Beam Epitaxy (MBE) growth of n-type CdSe on p-type PbSe single crystalline film. The use of Reflection High-Energy Electron Diffraction (RHEED) during the nucleation and growth of CdSe indicates high-quality single-phase cubic CdSe. This is a first-time demonstration of single crystalline and single phase CdSe growth on single crystalline PbSe, to the best of our knowledge. The current–voltage characteristic indicates a p–n junction diode with a rectifying factor over 50 at room temperature. The detector structure is characterized by radiometric measurement. A 30 μm × 30 μm pixel achieved a peak responsivity of 0.06 A/W and a specific detectivity (D*) of 6.5 × 108 Jones under a zero bias photovoltaic operation. With decreasing temperature, the optical signal increased by almost an order of magnitude as it approached 230 K (with thermoelectric cooling) while maintaining a similar level of noise, achieving a responsivity of 0.441 A/W and a D* of 4.4 × 109 Jones at 230 K.

1. Introduction

Lead selenide has a long history in Mid-Wave Infrared (MWIR) optoelectronic development, with more recent attention focused on the fabrication of MWIR detectors pushing beyond the cryogenic barrier. A room-temperature high-detectivity (D*) MWIR PbSe Photoconductor (PC) has been demonstrated [1,2,3]. To date, low-cost PbSe MWIR photoconductors operating at uncooled or Thermoelectric (TE)-cooled temperatures remain the choice for many sensing and imaging applications [4]. Such high performance is attributed to its low Auger recombination rate at high temperatures. The Auger coefficient in IV-VI semiconductors such as PbSe is roughly an order of magnitude lower than those in Sb-based type-II quantum wells (QWs), which are in turn significantly suppressed relative to other III-V and II-VI semiconductors such as Mercury Cadmium Telluride (MCT) with the same energy gaps [5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. Although very promising performance has been demonstrated by polycrystalline PbSe PC Focal Planar Arrays (FPA), several problems are still associated with their design, including film inhomogeneity, large 1/f noise and limited FPA resolution due to contact configuration for PC detectors [12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. Ideally, if one could develop PbSe photovoltaic detectors with the same performance as their PC counterpart, these problems could be solved. Due to fast dopant diffusion, it is hard to make an abrupt p–n homojunction. Therefore, the heterostructure p–n junction would be one potential option. The challenge for forming a heterojunction is finding a substrate that PbSe can grow on and, at the same time, making a viable type-II heterostructure. We proposed an n-type PbSe/p-type germanium type-II heterostructure [19,20]. Although there is more than an eight percent lattice mismatch between germanium and PbSe, single crystal PbSe was successfully grown on a surface-treated vicinal germanium substrate, resulting in an I-V curve with a very high rectification factor. Despite this, additional work is required to optimize the growth conditions and enhance the detectivity.
II-VI/IV-VI heterostructures such as PbSe/CdSe(S) offer another promising alternative. Initial demonstrations of thermally evaporated polycrystalline CdS thin films on PbSe were fabricated to produce the photovoltaic structure for MWIR detection. While the initial results from these experiments have shown great potential, issues with photogenerated carrier blocking and band alignment issues at lower operating temperatures have stunted their progress [21]. The group II-selenide CdSe and group IV-selenide PbSe form an interesting pair. As shown in Table 1, the lattice constant of CdSe (6.08 A) and PbSe (6.12 A) is close (0.66% mismatch). However, their bandgaps of bulk materials are significantly different, with CdSe being a “wide” bandgap material and PbSe being a narrow bandgap material with room temperature bandgaps of 1.71 eV and 0.27 eV, respectively [22,23,24]. These properties offer opportunities to fabricate nearly lattice-matched high-quality PbSe/CdSe heterogeneous devices. CdSe has been widely used as the shell material for PbSe/CdSe core/shell colloidal quantum dots [25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33]. Two types of crystal structures, cubic zincblende and wurtzite hexagonal crystal structures, have been reported for CdSe with different bandgap energies [23,24,34]. Reported band alignments between CdSe and PbSe are not consistent, with the reported electron affinity value of CdSe either slightly higher or lower than that of PbSe, resulting in either type-I or type-II band alignment [35,36,37,38].
In previous works, we have investigated the polycrystalline II-VI n-CdSe films and IV-VI p-PbSe heterojunctions [39,40]. While PbSe has a cubic rock salt crystal structure, polycrystalline CdSe films typically include a hexagonal crystal structure [39]. Such structural differences could introduce interface defects, likely forming a type-I band alignment. In this paper, we report a new method for fabricating an all-epitaxial single-phase (cubic) n-CdSe/p-PbSe heterostructure and link its changes in detector behavior to its polycrystalline II-VI predecessors. The aim of this paper is to fabricate an uncooled photovoltaic mid-infrared photodetector with a decent performance. The growth of a single-phase (cubic-zincblende) epitaxial CdSe thin-film on single crystalline PbSe has never been previously reported, and its demonstration here showcases its potential for the future design of enhanced MWIR PbSe-based photovoltaic detectors. In the following sections, the growth method of the heterostructure is discussed, then the material quality is characterized with RHEED and X-ray diffraction methods. Then, the IV characteristic is shown, and the radiometric measurement is carried out.

2. Experimental Methods

2.1. Epitaxial Heterojunction Growth

The epitaxial n-CdSe/p-PbSe heterostructure was deposited by MBE on freshly cleaved BaF2 (111) substrate with a background pressure of 1 × 10−8 Torr. BaF2 substrates were used for their excellent long-wave optical transmittance and similar crystal structure with PbSe, enabling epitaxial growth and subsequent back-side illumination detector design for device testing. Then, 1.2 μm PbSe thin films were deposited by direct evaporation of 99.9999% purity PbSe with 0.1% Se-rich effusion source (49.9 wt% lead atoms and 50.1 wt% selenium atoms) in combination with 99.9999% purity elemental Se effusion source to achieve a p-type carrier concentration of 2 × 1017 cm−3. Epitaxial 200 nm CdSe thin films were then deposited using a 99.999% purity CdSe compound effusion source in combination with a 99.999% purity Bi2Se3 effusion source to achieve n-type doping.

2.2. Epitaxial Heterojunction Growth

A back-side illumination detector structure was fabricated by a photolithography process involving etching of CdSe mesa using a 3:1:1 mixture of 35% HCl acid, 85% phosphoric acid and DI water for 20 sec. Se washing was necessary immediately following the CdSe etching to remove the deposited selenium residue from the sample surface. This process consists of 98 wt% H2SO4 + 30 wt% H2O2 in a 3:1 volume-to-volume ratio.
After forming the mesa structure, 300 nm gold was thermally deposited using Lesker Nano 36, and then lift-off of the gold contacts was performed, and the sample was wire bonded using a wedge gold wire bonder for current–voltage analysis and radiometric measurements. The proposed band structure diagram in Figure 1b predicts a type-II heterojunction formation between an n-doped cubic CdSe epitaxial thin film with a p-PbSe layer. After PbSe absorbs the mid-infrared light, an electron–hole pair is generated. Then, the electron–hole pair is separated by the heterostructure’s built-in potential. Finally, the electrons are diffused into CdSe, and holes are transported within the PbSe layer until they reach the contact.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Crystallography and Surface Morphology of Epitaxial CdSe Films on PbSe

RHEED is an in situ powerful tool in MBE to monitor and evaluate the real-time growth procedure. RHEED employs an electron gun to graze the substrate with high-energy electrons. Based on the atomic spacing and crystal structure of the surface of the sample, as well as the wavelength of the incident electrons, diffraction results in the constructive interference of the electrons at specific angles. We used this powerful tool to watch the layer-by-layer growth. In situ RHEED monitoring of the growth evolution was captured and analyzed using the KSA 400 data acquisition and analysis software tool. X-ray diffraction (XRD) was used to corroborate the RHEED observations and examine the surface morphology and crystallography of the epitaxial CdSe thin films on PbSe. In situ RHEED measurements were performed during the MBE deposition of lead selenide and cadmium selenide epitaxial films on barium fluoride substrates. Special interest was focused on the nucleation and growth evolution of CdSe thin films on PbSe since the single phase (cubic) epitaxial growth of CdSe on the IV-VI rock salt crystal structure has never been reported.
Observing Figure 2, the nucleation of CdSe shows a strong correlation with the growth surface, matching the structure and orientation of the PbSe seed layer while proceeding in a layer-by-layer growth mode. After the initial deposition accumulation exceeds 5 nm, RHEED observations begin to show signs of roughening, with the formation of 3D spots along the <110> direction. The rest of the bulk 200 nm thick CdSe growth proceeds virtually unchanged, with no noticeable contributions from varying CdSe crystallites, such as off-orientation cubic CdSe grains or the formation of a secondary phase of wurtzite CdSe. Interestingly, line profile analysis of the CdSe RHEED images shows an identical diffraction spacing between the <110> CdSe and the <110> PbSe fringes. This indicates that the epitaxial growth of CdSe maintained roughly the same lattice parameter as PbSe during the bulk of the 200 nm thin film growth. Only during the last few nanometers of thickness did the line spacing begin to increase, indicating a decrease in the lattice parameter. While PbSe has a relaxed lattice constant of 6.12 Å, the literature indicates an expected lattice constant of 6.08 Å for cubic CdSe. However, here we observe a slightly larger lattice parameter for the bulk CdSe film deposition closer to the 6.12 Å of PbSe. This phenomenon is further investigated in the following XRD measurement and analysis of the as-grown heterostructure.
High-resolution X-ray diffraction measurements were taken of the as-grown CdSe/PbSe heterostructure on BaF2. XRD scans of the main (111) substrate and layer peaks for PbSe and CdSe show a striking overlap of their diffraction peak contributions, as was expected from the RHEED investigation. The inset image in Figure 3 shows the deconvoluted peak contributions from the PbSe and CdSe layers, with a PbSe (111) peak position of 25.30° and a CdSe peak position of 25.38°. No off-orientation peak contributions were observed for either PbSe or CdSe, and neither were there any contributions from wurtzite CdSe, with characteristic peak positions at 23.4°, 24.8°, 26.5°, and 38.4°. The observations here corroborate the in situ RHEED measurements observed during the growth of CdSe on PbSe, indicating unambiguously the successful formation of a single phase (cubic) bulk epitaxial CdSe thin film deposited directly on PbSe.

3.2. Current-Voltage and Radiometric Measurements

Processing of a 30 μm × 30 μm pixel for I-V measurement was performed to investigate the potential p–n junction behavior between the epitaxial n-CdSe and p-PbSe films. Current-voltage measurements were performed using a Keithley 2400 source meter instrument.
Figure 4a shows the J-V statistics for the as-grown n-CdSe/p-PbSe heterojunction structure, demonstrating strong room-temperature p–n junction behavior similar to previous investigations on poly-CdSe/PbSe devices [40]. Notably, a strong rectifying factor is observed, indicating the formation of a barrier for the reverse bias current, with a rectifying factor of 50 when comparing the current density at 0.5 V forward bias and reverse bias, respectively (Figure 4b). Subsequently, the reverse bias current density at −100 mV is only 7.5 mA/cm2. While reports of similar levels of dark current density have been observed before in PbSe-based PV structures, the report here distinguishes itself in that the low leakage current was observed for the as-grown material structure without any post-growth passivation treatments.
Figure 5 shows temperature-dependent radiometric measurements, which were performed from room temperature down to 230 K to investigate the signal-dampening phenomenon observed in our previous CdSe/PbSe efforts. The as-grown n-CdSe/p-PbSe structure displays a temperature-dependent signal increase at lower temperatures while maintaining similar noise levels resulting in higher detectivities.
To measure the specific detectivity and responsivity, a calibrated 500 °C blackbody from Infrared System Development was used as the infrared light source. A Thorlabs mechanical chopper was used to modulate the mid-infrared light of the blackbody with a 750 Hz chopping frequency. Measurements were conducted under the zero-bias condition. The signal and noise currents from the device are collected from a Stanford Research System SR830 lock-in amplifier. The Responsivity (R) and Specific Detectivity (D*) were calculated using the following formulas.
D * = R * A * Δ f I n ( J o n e s )
R = I s P i ( A / W )
where Is and In are the measured detector output signal and noise currents, A is the device detection area, Δ f is the noise bandwidth, and Pi is the incident radiant power. The room temperature 30 μm × 30 μm pixel achieved a peak responsivity of 0.06 A/W and a D* of 6.5 × 108 Jones under the zero bias photovoltaic operation. With decreasing temperature, the optical signal increased by almost an order of magnitude as it approached 230 K while maintaining a similar level of noise, achieving a responsivity of 0.441 A/W and a D* of 4.4 × 109 Jones at 230 K. The temperature-dependent behavior observed in this new single-phase epitaxial n-CdSe/p-PbSe heterojunction device sheds light on the inverted temperature-dependent behavior phenomenon observed by the previous explorations of similar CdSe/PbSe PV detector structures. Here, this new epitaxial interface between cubic PbSe and CdSe films without any contributions from hexagonal-CdSe grains demonstrates the first example of the CdSe/PbSe PV detector structure’s continued increase in signal and detector performance down to thermoelectric-cooled operating temperatures. Further, the as-grown detector performance of this new technology demonstrates an almost 3 × D* increase at room temperature compared to the as-grown poly-CdSe/PbSe PV detector structure. Combined with the previous studies on device enhancement using post-growth treatment techniques and enhanced device structure design, this new epitaxial p–n heterojunction structure demonstrates a promising advancement in the fabrication of enhanced II-VI/IV-VI interfaces and heterojunctions, with the potential for developing new state-of-the-art MWIR photodetectors operating above cryogenic cooling temperatures.

4. Conclusions

This study exhibits the integration of epitaxial n-CdSe films on p-PbSe films on BaF2 substrates, resulting in a novel p–n heterogeneous structure with outstanding material quality, promising J-V statistics, and decent high-temperature detectivity. In situ and ex situ characterization of the resulting heterogeneous structure shows the formation of a high-material-quality epitaxial single-orientation CdSe on PbSe. Future work will focus on further improving and understanding the growth mechanism and growth of the material system on CaF2-Silicon substrate to utilize the scalability of the technology to the silicon technology standard. Further extending the PbSe absorption spectra via ternary Pb1−xSnxSe compound films into the long-wave infrared (LWIR) regime and integrating the n-CdSe/p-PbSe heterostructure on silicon may push the limits of this material structure and open doors to new and intriguing technological fronts.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.S.; methodology, L.L.M. and M.R.M.; formal analysis, L.L.M.; investigation, L.L.M. and M.R.M.; resources, Z.S.; data curation, L.L.M. and M.R.M.; writing—original draft preparation, L.L.M. and M.R.M.; writing—review and editing, M.R.M. and Z.S.; visualization, L.L.M. and M.R.M.; supervision, Z.S.; project administration, Z.S.; funding acquisition, Z.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by the US army research office (ARO) under contract No. W911NF-18-1-0418.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available through email upon a reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

Financial support was provided by the University of Oklahoma Libraries’ Open Access fund.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Qiu, J.; Weng, B.; Yuan, Z.; Shi, Z. Study of Sensitization Process on Mid-Infrared Uncooled PbSe Photoconductive Detectors Leads to High Detectivity. J. Appl. Phys. 2013, 113, 103102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Zhao, L.; Qiu, J.; Weng, B.; Chang, C.; Yuan, Z.; Shi, Z. Understanding Sensitization Behavior of Lead Selenide Photoconductive Detectors by Charge Separation Model. J. Appl. Phys. 2014, 115, 084502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Weng, B.; Qiu, J.; Yuan, Z.; Larson, P.R.; Strout, G.W.; Shi, Z. Responsivity Enhancement of Mid-Infrared PbSe Detectors Using CaF 2 Nano-Structured Antireflective Coatings. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 104, 021109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Green, K.; Yoo, S.-S.; Kauffman, C. Lead Salt TE-Cooled Imaging Sensor Development; Andresen, B.F., Fulop, G.F., Hanson, C.M., Norton, P.R., Eds.; SPIE: Baltimore, MD, USA, 24 June 2014; p. 90701G. [Google Scholar]
  5. Klann, R.; Höfer, T.; Buhleier, R.; Elsaesser, T.; Tomm, J.W. Fast Recombination Processes in Lead Chalcogenide Semiconductors Studied via Transient Optical Nonlinearities. J. Appl. Phys. 1995, 77, 277–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Findlay, P.C.; Pidgeon, C.R.; Kotitschke, R.; Hollingworth, A.; Murdin, B.N.; Langerak, C.J.G.M.; van der Meer, A.F.G.; Ciesla, C.M.; Oswald, J.; Homer, A.; et al. Auger Recombination Dynamics of Lead Salts under Picosecond Free-Electron-Laser Excitation. Phys. Rev. B 1998, 58, 12908–12915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Ziep, O.; Mocker, M.; Genzow, D.; Herrmann, K.H. Auger recombination in PbSnTe-like semiconductors. Phys. Stat. Sol. B 1978, 90, 197–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Youngdale, E.R.; Meyer, J.R.; Hoffman, C.A.; Bartoli, F.J.; Grein, C.H.; Young, P.M.; Ehrenreich, H.; Miles, R.H.; Chow, D.H. Auger Lifetime Enhancement in InAs–Ga1−xInx Sb Superlattices. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1994, 64, 3160–3162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Meyer, J.R.; Felix, C.L.; Bewley, W.W.; Vurgaftman, I.; Aifer, E.H.; Olafsen, L.J.; Lindle, J.R.; Hoffman, C.A.; Yang, M.-J.; Bennett, B.R.; et al. Auger Coefficients in Type-II InAs/Ga1−xInxSb Quantum Wells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1998, 73, 2857–2859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ciesla, C.M.; Murdin, B.N.; Phillips, T.J.; White, A.M.; Beattie, A.R.; Langerak, C.J.G.M.; Elliott, C.T.; Pidgeon, C.R.; Sivananthan, S. Auger Recombination Dynamics of Hg0.795Cd0.205Te in the High Excitation Regime. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1997, 71, 491–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Beattie, A.R.; White, A.M. An Analytic Approximation with a Wide Range of Applicability for Electron Initiated Auger Transitions in Narrow-Gap Semiconductors. J. Appl. Phys. 1996, 79, 802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ganguly, S.; Tang, X.; Yoo, S.-S.; Guyot-Sionnest, P.; Ghosh, A.W. Extrinsic Voltage Control of Effective Carrier Lifetime in Polycrystalline PbSe Mid-Wave IR Photodetectors for Increased Detectivity. AIP Adv. 2020, 10, 095117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yang, H.; Wang, G.; Li, X.; Zheng, J. Effect of in Situ O+ Beam Induction on the Microstructures and Optical Properties of Polycrystalline Lead Selenide Films. Mater. Lett. 2019, 251, 85–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Qiu, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, G.; Shi, K.; Li, Y.; Luo, Y. Modified Vapor Phase Deposition Technology for High-Performance Uncooled MIR PbSe Detectors. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 34908–34914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kumar, P.; Pfeffer, M.; Schweda, E.; Eibl, O.; Qiu, J.; Shi, Z. PbSe Mid-IR Photoconductive Thin Films (Part I): Phase Analysis of the Functional Layer. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 724, 316–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kumar, P.; Pfeffer, M.; Berthold, C.; Eibl, O. PbSe Mid-IR Photoconductive Thin Films (Part-II): Structural Analysis of the Functional Layer. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 735, 1654–1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wu, H.; Si, J.; Xu, T.; Cao, C. Progress of IV-VI Semiconductor Research in China. In Proceedings of the 2006 Joint 31st International Conference on Infrared Millimeter Waves and 14th International Conference on Teraherz Electronics, Shanghai, China, 18–22 September 2006; IEEE: Shanghai, China; p. 407. [Google Scholar]
  18. Yang, H.; Li, X.; Wang, G.; Zheng, J. The Electrical Properties of Carrier Transport between Lead Selenide Polycrystallites Manipulated by Iodine Concentration. AIP Adv. 2018, 8, 085316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. McDowell, L.L.; Qiu, J.; Mirzaei, M.R.; Weng, B.; Shi, Z. Integration of Epitaxial IV–VI Pb-Chalcogenide on Group IV Vicinal Ge Substrate to Form p–n Heterogeneous Structures. Cryst. Growth Des. 2022, 22, 461–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. McDowell, L.L.; Rastkar, M.; Shi, Z. Integration of Epitaxial N-PbSe Films on Mismatched p-Ge Substrates to Form a p-n Heterogeneous Structure. In Proceedings of the Infrared Technology and Applications XLVIII, Orlando, FL, USA, 30 May 2022; Fulop, G.F., Kimata, M., Zheng, L., Andresen, B.F., Miller, J.L., Kim, Y.-H., Eds.; SPIE: Orlando, FL, USA; p. 67. [Google Scholar]
  21. Weng, B.; Qiu, J.; Zhao, L.; Chang, C.; Shi, Z. CdS/PbSe Heterojunction for High Temperature Mid-Infrared Photovoltaic Detector Applications. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 104, 121111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Lach-hab, M.; Papaconstantopoulos, D.A.; Mehl, M.J. Electronic Structure Calculations of Lead Chalcogenides PbS, PbSe, PbTe. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2002, 63, 833–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Samarth, N.; Luo, H.; Furdyna, J.K.; Qadri, S.B.; Lee, Y.R.; Ramdas, A.K.; Otsuka, N. Growth of Cubic (Zinc Blende) CdSe by Molecular Beam Epitaxy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1989, 54, 2680–2682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Muslih, E.Y.; Munir, B.; Khan, M.M. Advances in Chalcogenides and Chalcogenides-Based Nanomaterials Such as Sulfides, Selenides, and Tellurides. In Chalcogenide-Based Nanomaterials as Photocatalysts; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 7–31. ISBN 978-0-12-820498-6. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hanson, C.J.; Hartmann, N.F.; Singh, A.; Ma, X.; DeBenedetti, W.J.I.; Casson, J.L.; Grey, J.K.; Chabal, Y.J.; Malko, A.V.; Sykora, M.; et al. Giant PbSe/CdSe/CdSe Quantum Dots: Crystal-Structure-Defined Ultrastable Near-Infrared Photoluminescence from Single Nanocrystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 11081–11088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zaiats, G.; Yanover, D.; Vaxenburg, R.; Shapiro, A.; Safran, A.; Hesseg, I.; Sashchiuk, A.; Lifshitz, E. PbSe/CdSe Thin-Shell Colloidal Quantum Dots. Z. Phys. Chem. 2015, 229, 3–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cirloganu, C.M.; Padilha, L.A.; Lin, Q.; Makarov, N.S.; Velizhanin, K.A.; Luo, H.; Robel, I.; Pietryga, J.M.; Klimov, V.I. Enhanced Carrier Multiplication in Engineered Quasi-Type-II Quantum Dots. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Lystrom, L.; Tamukong, P.; Mihaylov, D.; Kilina, S. Phonon-Driven Energy Relaxation in PbS/CdS and PbSe/CdSe Core/Shell Quantum Dots. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2020, 11, 4269–4278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Salzmann, B.B.V.; de Wit, J.; Li, C.; Arenas-Esteban, D.; Bals, S.; Meijerink, A.; Vanmaekelbergh, D. Two-Dimensional CdSe-PbSe Heterostructures and PbSe Nanoplatelets: Formation, Atomic Structure, and Optical Properties. J. Phys. Chem. C 2022, 126, 1513–1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Williams, K.R.; Diroll, B.T.; Watkins, N.E.; Rui, X.; Brumberg, A.; Klie, R.F.; Schaller, R.D. Synthesis of Type I PbSe/CdSe Dot-on-Plate Heterostructures with Near-Infrared Emission. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 5092–5096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. De Geyter, B.; Justo, Y.; Moreels, I.; Lambert, K.; Smet, P.F.; Van Thourhout, D.; Houtepen, A.J.; Grodzinska, D.; de Mello Donega, C.; Meijerink, A.; et al. The Different Nature of Band Edge Absorption and Emission in Colloidal PbSe/CdSe Core/Shell Quantum Dots. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Zhang, Y.; Dai, Q.; Li, X.; Cui, Q.; Gu, Z.; Zou, B.; Wang, Y.; Yu, W.W. Formation of PbSe/CdSe Core/Shell Nanocrystals for Stable Near-Infrared High Photoluminescence Emission. Nanoscale. Res. Lett. 2010, 5, 1279–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Mirzaei, M.R.; Rostami, A.; Matloub, S.; Mirtaghizadeh, H. Ultra-High-Efficiency Luminescent Solar Concentrator Using Superimposed Colloidal Quantum Dots. Opt. Quantum Electron. 2020, 52, 327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zorman, B.; Ramakrishna, M.V.; Friesner, R.A. Quantum Confinement Effects in CdSe Quantum Dots. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 7649–7653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Adachi, S. Properties of Group-IV, III–V and II–VI Semiconductors: Adachi/Properties of Group-IV, III–V and II–VI Semiconductors; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2005; ISBN 978-0-470-09034-3. [Google Scholar]
  36. Chizhov, A.S.; Rumyantseva, M.N.; Vasiliev, R.B.; Filatova, D.G.; Drozdov, K.A.; Krylov, I.V.; Marchevsky, A.V.; Karakulina, O.M.; Abakumov, A.M.; Gaskov, A.M. Visible Light Activation of Room Temperature NO2 Gas Sensors Based on ZnO, SnO2 and In2O3 Sensitized with CdSe Quantum Dots. Thin Solid Film. 2016, 618, 253–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Swank, R.K. Surface Properties of II-VI Compounds. Phys. Rev. 1967, 153, 844–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Suzuki, H. Electron Affinity of Semiconducting Compound CdSe. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 1966, 5, 1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Qiu, J.; Liu, Y.; Cai, Z.; Phan, Q.; Shi, Z. CdSe:In Mid-Infrared Transparent Conductive Films Prospering Uncooled PbSe/CdSe Heterojunction Photovoltaic Detectors. Mater. Adv. 2022, 3, 1079–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Luo, Y.; McDowell, L.; Su, L.; Liu, Y.; Qiu, J.; Shi, Z. Enhanced Performance in Uncooled N-CdSe/p-PbSe Photovoltaic Detectors by High-Temperature Chloride Passivation. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 8423–8428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (a) Configuration schematic of the n-CdSe/p-PbSe heterojunction mid-IR photodiode with back-side illumination 1.2 μm PbSe deposited on 2 mm BaF2 substrate with 200 nm CdSe film deposited on top; 300 nm thick gold deposited on top the CdSe pixel and PbSe to create the contacts. (b) suggested energy band diagram of the n-CdSe/p-PbSe heterostructure (in the figure, E vac, EC, EF, EV, EEA, VBI, EG, ΔEV, δ stands for vacuum energy, conduction band energy, Fermi energy, valence band energy, electron affinity, built-in potential, energy band gap, valence band offset, and energy difference between Fermi energy and conduction band, or Fermi energy between valence band, respectively).
Figure 1. (a) Configuration schematic of the n-CdSe/p-PbSe heterojunction mid-IR photodiode with back-side illumination 1.2 μm PbSe deposited on 2 mm BaF2 substrate with 200 nm CdSe film deposited on top; 300 nm thick gold deposited on top the CdSe pixel and PbSe to create the contacts. (b) suggested energy band diagram of the n-CdSe/p-PbSe heterostructure (in the figure, E vac, EC, EF, EV, EEA, VBI, EG, ΔEV, δ stands for vacuum energy, conduction band energy, Fermi energy, valence band energy, electron affinity, built-in potential, energy band gap, valence band offset, and energy difference between Fermi energy and conduction band, or Fermi energy between valence band, respectively).
Materials 16 01866 g001
Figure 2. In situ RHEED measurements of the characteristic [110] orientation for (a) 1 μm thick PbSe film on BaF2, (b) 3 ML nucleation of CdSe on PbSe, (c) 5 nm of CdSe, and (d) final 200 nm bulk CdSe thin film. The nucleation on growth of CdSe suggest that the CdSe followed the PbSe crystal structure and orientation.
Figure 2. In situ RHEED measurements of the characteristic [110] orientation for (a) 1 μm thick PbSe film on BaF2, (b) 3 ML nucleation of CdSe on PbSe, (c) 5 nm of CdSe, and (d) final 200 nm bulk CdSe thin film. The nucleation on growth of CdSe suggest that the CdSe followed the PbSe crystal structure and orientation.
Materials 16 01866 g002
Figure 3. XRD measurement of the epitaxial n-CdSe/p-PbSe heterostructure on BaF2 (111) substrate. The inset shows a simulated overlapping peak of PbSe and CdSe.
Figure 3. XRD measurement of the epitaxial n-CdSe/p-PbSe heterostructure on BaF2 (111) substrate. The inset shows a simulated overlapping peak of PbSe and CdSe.
Materials 16 01866 g003
Figure 4. (a) Room-temperature J-V and (b) I-V characteristic of the epitaxial n-CdSe/p-PbSe heterojunction structure shows a strong room temperature p–n junction behavior.
Figure 4. (a) Room-temperature J-V and (b) I-V characteristic of the epitaxial n-CdSe/p-PbSe heterojunction structure shows a strong room temperature p–n junction behavior.
Materials 16 01866 g004
Figure 5. Temperature-dependent peak responsivity (black curve) and D* (blue curve) measurements from 300 K down to 230 K under zero bias photovoltaic mode. It shows almost an order of magnitude of higher signal when the device is cooled down to 230 K.
Figure 5. Temperature-dependent peak responsivity (black curve) and D* (blue curve) measurements from 300 K down to 230 K under zero bias photovoltaic mode. It shows almost an order of magnitude of higher signal when the device is cooled down to 230 K.
Materials 16 01866 g005
Table 1. Material properties of PbSe and CdSe.
Table 1. Material properties of PbSe and CdSe.
MaterialCrystal StructureLattice Constant (Å)Bandgap (eV)Reference
PbSeRock Salt6.120.27[22]
CdSeZincblende6.08 1.71[23,24]
CdSeHexagonal4.31.8[24,34]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

McDowell, L.L.; Rastkar Mirzaei, M.; Shi, Z. Epitaxial CdSe/PbSe Heterojunction Growth and MWIR Photovoltaic Detector. Materials 2023, 16, 1866. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16051866

AMA Style

McDowell LL, Rastkar Mirzaei M, Shi Z. Epitaxial CdSe/PbSe Heterojunction Growth and MWIR Photovoltaic Detector. Materials. 2023; 16(5):1866. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16051866

Chicago/Turabian Style

McDowell, Lance L., Milad Rastkar Mirzaei, and Zhisheng Shi. 2023. "Epitaxial CdSe/PbSe Heterojunction Growth and MWIR Photovoltaic Detector" Materials 16, no. 5: 1866. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16051866

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop