Next Article in Journal
High-Mobility Topological Semimetals as Novel Materials for Huge Magnetoresistance Effect and New Type of Quantum Hall Effect
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluating the Accuracy of Bonded Block Models for Prediction of Rockmass Analog Mechanical Behavior
Previous Article in Journal
Preparation, Characterization, and Properties of UV-Curable Coating Doped with Nano-SiO2
Previous Article in Special Issue
Recovery of Phosphorus and Metals from the Ash of Sewage Sludge, Municipal Solid Waste, or Wood Biomass: A Review and Proposals for Further Use
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

New Minerals from Inclusions in Corundum Xenocrysts from Mt. Carmel, Israel: Magnéliite, Ziroite, Sassite, Mizraite-(Ce) and Yeite

1
Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
2
Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra “A. Desio”, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Mangiagalli 34, I-20133 Milan, Italy
3
Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Via La Pira 4, I-50121 Florence, Italy
4
Shefa Gems (A.T.M.) Ltd., Netanya 4210602, Israel
5
ARC Centre of Excellence for Core to Crust Fluid Systems and GEMOC, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW 2109, Australia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(24), 7578; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16247578
Submission received: 27 October 2023 / Revised: 3 December 2023 / Accepted: 7 December 2023 / Published: 9 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Rock and Mineral Materials)

Abstract

:
Our nanomineralogical investigation of melt inclusions in corundum xenocrysts from the Mt. Carmel area, Israel has revealed seven IMA-approved new minerals since 2021. We report here four new oxide minerals and one new alloy mineral. Magnéliite (Ti3+2Ti4+2O7; IMA 2021-111) occurs as subhedral crystals, ~4 μm in size, with alabandite, zirconolite, Ti,Al,Zr-oxide, and hibonite in corundum Grain 767-1. Magnéliite has an empirical formula (Ti3+1.66Al0.13Ti4+0.15Mg0.10Ca0.01Sc0.01)Σ2.06 (Ti4+1.93Zr0.08)Σ2.01O7 and the triclinic P 1 ¯ Ti4O7-type structure with the cell parameters: a = 5.60(1) Å, b = 7.13(1) Å, c = 12.47(1) Å, α = 95.1(1)°, β = 95.2(1)°, γ = 108.7(1)°, V = 466(2) Å3, Z = 4. Ziroite (ZrO2; IMA 2022-013) occurs as irregular crystals, ~1–4 μm in size, with baddeleyite, hibonite, and Ti,Al,Zr-oxide in corundum Grain 479-1a. Ziroite has an empirical formula (Zr0.72Ti4+0.26Mg0.02Al0.02Hf0.01)Σ1.03O2 and the tetragonal P42/nmc zirconia(HT)-type structure with the cell parameters: a = 3.60(1) Å, c = 5.18(1) Å, V = 67.1(3) Å3, Z = 2. Sassite (Ti3+2Ti4+O5; IMA 2022-014) occurs as subhedral-euhedral crystals, ~4–16 μm in size, with Ti,Al,Zr-oxide, mullite, osbornite, baddeleyite, alabandite, and glass in corundum Grain 1125C1. Sassite has an empirical formula (Ti3+1.35Al0.49Ti4+0.08Mg0.07)Σ1.99(Ti4+0.93Zr0.06Si0.01)Σ1.00O5 and the orthorhombic Cmcm pseudobrookite-type structure with the cell parameters: a = 3.80(1) Å, b = 9.85(1) Å, c = 9.99(1) Å, V = 374(1) Å3, Z = 4. Mizraite-(Ce) (Ce(Al11Mg)O19; IMA 2022-027) occurs as euhedral crystals, <1–14 μm in size, with Ce-silicate, Ti-sulfide, Ti,Al,Zr-oxide, ziroite, and thorianite in corundum Grain 198-8. Mizraite-(Ce) has an empirical formula (Ce0.76Ca0.10La0.07Nd0.01)Σ0.94(Al10.43Mg0.84Ti3+0.60Si0.09Zr0.04)Σ12.00O19 and the hexagonal P63/mmc magnetoplumbite-type structure with the cell parameters: a = 5.61(1) Å, c = 22.29(1) Å, V = 608(2) Å3, Z = 2. Yeite (TiSi; IMA 2022-079) occurs as irregular-subhedral crystals, 1.2–3.5 μm in size, along with wenjiite (Ti5Si3) and zhiqinite (TiSi2) in Ti-Si alloy inclusions in corundum Grain 198c. Yeite has an empirical formula (Ti0.995Mn0.003V0.001Cr0.001)(Si0.996P0.004) and the orthorhombic Pnma FeB-type structure with the cell parameters: a = 6.55(1) Å, b = 3.64(1) Å, c = 4.99(1) Å, V = 119.0(4) Å3, Z = 4. The five minerals are high-temperature oxide or alloy phases, formed in melt pockets in corundum xenocrysts derived from the upper mantle beneath Mt. Carmel.

1. Introduction

Worldwide, super-reduced mineral assemblages are commonly associated with explosive volcanic events such as kimberlites, alkali basalts, and tholeiitic basalts, as well as in ophiolites linked to deep subduction along continental plate margins [1,2,3]. The origins of these assemblages have sparked debate, with some attributing them to human activities [4]. However, the extensively documented xenoliths and xenocrysts discovered in small Cretaceous volcanoes and Plio-Pleistocene gem placer deposits at Mt. Carmel, Israel, play a crucial role in this discussion. The geological context, along with thorough geochemical analysis and precise geochronological data, effectively refute any plausible notion of human interference [3,5,6]. Many super-reduced minerals are identified as inclusions within xenoliths composed of corundum aggregates. The relationships between these different phases within melt inclusions have been crucial in interpreting the genesis of super-reduced magma-fluid systems.
A nanomineralogical investigation of melt inclusions found in corundum xenocrysts coming from volcanic centers and associated alluvial deposits in the Mt. Carmel area, Israel, has allowed us to discover seven IMA-approved new minerals since 2021: griffinite (Al2TiO5), magnéliite (Ti3+2Ti4+2O7), ziroite (ZrO2), sassite (Ti3+2Ti4+O5), mizraite-(Ce) (Ce(Al11Mg)O19), toledoite (TiFeSi), and yeite (TiSi) [7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. All of them have been approved by the IMA-CNMNC (Commission on New Minerals, Nomenclature and Classification) as requested before naming and reporting the finding of a new mineral phase. Griffinite has been already published in detail [14]. Toledoite will be published in a separate paper. Reported here are another five new minerals, adding more information on the origin of reduced high-temperature minerals from the upper mantle.
Magnéliite (IMA 2021-111), Ti3+2Ti4+2O7 (simply Ti4O7), is a new Ti-oxide mineral that corresponds to the first member of the homologous series of Ti-oxides (with TinO2n−1), known also as Magnéli phases [15]. The name is in honor of Arne Magnéli (1914–1996), for his pioneering work on the structural chemistry of transition-metal oxides.
Ziroite (IMA 2022-013), ZrO2, is a new Zr-oxide mineral with the P42/nmc zirconia(HT)-type structure. The name is derived from its composition.
Sassite (IMA 2022-014), Ti3+2Ti4+O5 (simply Ti3O5), is another new Ti-oxide mineral with the Cmcm pseudobrookite-type structure. The name is in honor of Eytan Sass (b. 1932), a geologist at the Freddy and Nadine Herrmann Institute of Earth Sciences, Hebrew University of Jerusalem. He performed the excellent mapping work on Mt. Carmel that identified the various volcanic centers.
Mizraite-(Ce) (IMA 2022-027), Ce(Al11Mg)O19, is a new Ce-rich oxide mineral belonging to the magnetoplumbite-group [16], with the P63/mmc magnetoplumbite-type structure. The name is after the Mizra river in the Mt. Carmel region, where some corundum xenocrysts investigated in this study (including Grain 198-8) come from alluvial deposits. The tributary Mizra river flows into the Kishon River.
Yeite (IMA 2022-079) is a new alloy mineral, TiSi, with the Pnma FeB-type structure. The name is in honor of Danian Ye (b. 1939), a mineralogist at the Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, for his many contributions to mineralogy and crystal chemistry.

2. Materials and Methods

The corundum xenoliths hosting the new minerals as inclusions occur in the pyroclastic ejecta from small Cretaceous basaltic volcanoes on Mt. Carmel and from placer gemstone deposits found in the terraces of the Paleocene to Pleistocene proto-Kishon river; the modern Kishon River drains Mt. Carmel and the tributary Mizra river and enters the sea near Haifa in northern Israel [2]. Much of the xenolith material in the paleoterrace deposits probably also is derived from Miocene and Pliocene basalt outcroppings in the drainage area of the Kishon River. The xenoliths occur as aggregates of skeletal corundum crystals that enclose melt pockets containing reduced mineral assemblages [1,2,17,18].
All the type materials are deposited in the mineralogy collection of the Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Mangiagalli, 34-20133 Milano, Italy.
The type magnéliite in corundum Grain 767-1 from Mt. Carmel mount Corundum-SY is under the registration number MCMGPG-H2022-001.
The type ziroite in corundum Grain 479-1a from Mt. Carmel mount Corundum-18-1 is under the registration number MCMGPG-H2021-003.
The type sassite in corundum Grain 1125C1 from Mt. Carmel mount Corundum-18-1 is under the registration number MCMGPG-H2021-004.
The type mizraite-(Ce) in corundum Grain 198-8 from Mt. Carmel mount Corundum-18-1 is under the registration number MCMGPG-H2022-005.
The type yeite in corundum Grain 198c from Mt. Carmel mount Corundum-18-1 is under the registration number MCMGPG-H2021-002. This corundum grain also hosts the type griffinite (Al2TiO5; IMA 2021-110; [14]).
In order to characterize the composition and structure of the new minerals and associated phases, we used an electron probe microanalyzer (EPMA) and a high-resolution scanning electron microscope (SEM) with an X-ray energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS) and electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD). A ZEISS 1550VP Field-Emission SEM (ZEISS Group, Oberkochen, Germany) with an Oxford X-Max EDS was used for backscatter electron (BSE) imaging and fast elemental analysis. Quantitative WDS elemental microanalyses of the new minerals were carried out using a JEOL 8200 EPMA (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) (15 kV and 10 nA, focused beam) and processed with the CITZAF correction procedure [19]. The focused electron beam is ~150 nm in diameter.
EBSD analyses at a submicrometer scale were performed using methods described by [20,21] for studies of micron-sized new minerals. An HKL EBSD system on the ZEISS 1550VP Field-Emission SEM was operated at 20 kV and 6 nA in focused beam mode with a 70° tilted stage and in a variable pressure mode (25 Pa). The EBSD system was calibrated using a single-crystal silicon standard. Experimental EBSD patterns allowed the collection of structural information and cell constants that were derived by matching with those of the structures of synthetic phases from the ICSD (Inorganic Crystal Structure Database).
Due to the small size of the samples, most of the physical properties (optical, hardness, fracture, cleavage, habit, density, etc.) were impossible to obtain.

3. Results

3.1. Magnéliite

Magnéliite occurs with alabandite, zirconolite, Ti,Al,Zr-oxide, and hibonite in one inclusion from corundum Grain 767-1 (Figure 1). Other inclusions in this corundum grain contain hibonite and osbornite. It is transparent, occurring as subhedral crystals ~4 μm in size. The Gladstone–Dale relationship [22] gives n = 2.423, obtained from the chemical composition and calculated density.
The chemical composition of magnéliite using EPMA (Table 1) shows an empirical formula (based on 7 O pfu) of (Ti3+1.66Al0.13Ti4+0.15Mg0.10Ca0.01Sc0.01)Σ2.06(Ti4+1.93Zr0.08)Σ2.01O7. The simplified formula is (Ti3+,Al)2Ti4+2O7. The ideal formula is Ti3+2Ti4+2O7, which requires Ti2O3 47.36, TiO2 52.64, total 100 wt%.
The EBSD patterns can be indexed only by the P 1 ¯ Ti4O7-type structure and match the synthetic Ti4O7 cell from [23] (Figure 2), with a mean angular deviation of 0.32°–0.35°, revealing the following cell parameters: a = 5.60(1) Å, b = 7.13(1) Å, c = 12.47(1) Å, α = 95.1(1)°, β = 95.2(1)°, γ = 108.7(1)°, V = 466(2) Å3, and Z = 4. The calculated density is 4.30 g·cm−3 using the empirical formula and the unit-cell volume estimated from the EBSD data.
Magnéliite (Ti3+2Ti4+2O7) is a new Ti-oxide mineral. It belongs to the so-called Magnéli phases, i.e., a series of Ti-oxides homologous with TinO2n−1 (with n = from 4 to 10). The first member of the series, synthetic Ti4O7, is well known (e.g., [23,24,25]). The crystal structure of magnéliite can be considered to be derived from the structure of rutile TiO2 by crystallographic shear of the (121)rutile plane with a 1/2[0–11]rutile vector every four octahedra of rutile [26]. The resulting structure has chains of edge-sharing TiO6 octahedra truncated every four octahedra by the crystallographic shear planes (Figure 3). At room-T, Ti3+ and Ti4+ are disordered among the eight symmetrically independent positions, while at T < 120 K, Ti3+ and Ti4+ are arranged in an ordered fashion to form a Ti3+-Ti4+ pair (bipolarons) and the material becomes a nonmagnetic insulator. Recent data by [26] show that even at room-T some local ordering of Ti3+–Ti3+ and Ti4+–Ti4+ pairs exists.

3.2. Ziroite

Ziroite occurs with baddeleyite, Ce-rich hibonite, and Ti,Al,Zr-oxide in inclusions in corundum Grain 479-1a (Figure 4). Other inclusions in this corundum grain are MgAl-spinel, fluorbritholite-(Ce), osbornite, and hapkeite (Fe2Si). It occurs as irregular crystals ~1–4 μm in size. It is transparent and shows a brownish black tint. The Gladstone–Dale relationship gives n = 2.342.
The chemical composition of ziroite (Table 2) gives rise to an empirical formula (based on 2 O pfu) of (Zr0.72Ti4+0.26Mg0.02Al0.02Hf0.01)Σ1.03O2. The simplified formula is (Zr,Ti)O2. The ideal formula is ZrO2.
The EBSD patterns can be indexed only by the tetragonal P42/nmc zirconia (HT)-type and match the synthetic ZrO2 cell values of [28] (Figure 5), with a mean angular deviation of 0.30–0.36°, revealing the following cell parameters: a = 3.60(1) Å, c = 5.18(1) Å, V = 67.1(3) Å3, and Z = 2. The calculated density is 5.53 g·cm−3 using the empirical formula and the unit-cell volume estimated from the EBSD data.
Ziroite is a tetragonal polymorph of baddeleyite (monoclinic ZrO2). Synthetic ZrO2 with the P42/nmc zirconia (HT)-type structure is well known (Figure 6) (e.g., [28,29,30]). Reported here is the first natural occurrence of tetragonal ZrO2.

3.3. Sassite

Sassite occurs with Ti,Al,Zr-oxide, mullite, osbornite, baddeleyite, alabandite, and Si-rich glass in melt pockets trapped in corundum Grain 1125C1 (Figure 7). The mineral occurs as subhedral-euhedral crystals ~4–16 μm in size. It is transparent with a brown color. The Gladstone–Dale relationship gives n = 2.16.
Sassite (Table 3) shows an empirical formula (based on 5 O pfu) of (Ti3+1.35Al0.49Ti4+0.08Mg0.07)Σ1.99(Ti4+0.93Zr0.06Si0.01)Σ1.00O5. The simplified formula is (Ti3+, Al)2Ti4+O5. The ideal formula is Ti3+2Ti4+O5, which requires Ti2O3 64.29, TiO2 35.71, total 100 wt%.
The EBSD patterns can be indexed only by the orthorhombic Cmcm pseudobrookite-type structure and match the synthetic β-Ti3O5 cell from [31] (Figure 8), with a mean angular deviation of 0.31°–0.35°, revealing the following cell parameters: a = 3.80(1) Å, b = 9.85(1) Å, c = 9.99(1) Å, V = 374(1) Å3, and Z = 4. The calculated density is 3.81 g·cm−3 using the empirical formula and the unit-cell volume estimated from the EBSD data.
Sassite (Ti3+2Ti4+O5) is a new member of the pseudobrookite group, joining pseudobrookite (Fe2TiO5), armalcolite [(Mg,Fe2+)Ti2O5], and griffinite (Al2TiO5; IMA 2021-110) [14]. Synthetic Ti3O5-pseudobrookite is well known (e.g., [31,32]). It is also known as β-Ti3O5 because several polymorphs of Ti3O5 have been described so far. α–Ti3O5 has monoclinic symmetry, C2/m, with a = 9.752(1), b = 3.802(1), c = 9.442(1) Å, and β = 91.55(1)° [33]. β-Ti3O5 has orthorhombic symmetry, Cmcm, a =3.798(2), b = 9.846(3), c = 9.988(4) Å [31], which corresponds to sassite. γ-Ti3O5 has the monoclinic V3O5-type structure, with a = 10.115, b = 5.074, c = 7.182 Å, β = 112°, and C2/c space group [34], which corresponds to the mineral kaitianite, recently described in Allende CV3 carbonaceous chondrite [35]. δ–Ti3O5 has a monoclinic structure and P2/a space group, with lattice parameters a = 9.9651(7), b = 5.0604(4), c = 7.2114(5) Å, and β = 109.3324(9)°, and is related to γ-Ti3O5 by decreasing temperature [36,37]. λ–Ti3O5 is monoclinic C2/m with a = 9.8357(11), b = 3.7935(2), c = 9.9863(7) Å, β = 90.976(6)°, and is related to α–Ti3O5 by a second-order phase transition [38].
Kaitianite was first discovered in association with tistarite and rutile together with other refractory phases of corundum, xifengite, mullite, osbornite, and a new Ti,Al,Zr-oxide mineral in the Allende meteorite [35]; most of these minerals are also found in the melt pockets in corundum from Mt. Carmel. Ti3+-rich phases are common in melt inclusions in those corundum xenocrysts, including tistarite (Ti2O3), magnéliite (Ti3+2Ti4+2O7), sassite (Ti3+2Ti4+O5), and grossmanite. Sc-bearing sassite was identified in the SaU 290 CH3 chondrite as an ultrarefractory phase, labeled as “anosovite,” among the first solids formed in the solar system [39]. While low-temperature α–Ti3O5 is highly ordered (three octahedrally Ti sites, with <Ti–O> = 2.015 Å, 2.033 Å, and 2.033 Å), both sassite and kaitianite show higher degrees of disorder (two crystallographically independent Ti sites, labeled Ti1 and Ti2, are octahedrally surrounded by oxygen atoms, having <Ti1–O> = 2.0271 Å and <Ti2–O> = 2.0385 Å in sassite [31] and <Ti1–O> = 2.0334 Å and <Ti2–O> = 2.0331 Å in kaitianite [34]). In sassite, the TiO6 octahedra are linked by sharing edges and corners, building up a characteristic row extending along the c axis, which is joined to an adjacent row along [100] by sharing edges (Figure 9).

3.4. Mizraite-(Ce)

Mizraite-(Ce) occurs with Ce-silicate and Ti-sulfide in melt pockets between corundum and spinel within Grain 198-8 (Figure 10). Other inclusions in this corundum grain contain Ti,Al,Zr-oxide, ziroite, baddeleyite, thorianite, osbornite, zangboite (TiFeSi2), wenjiite (Ti5Si3), and a [(Mn,Fe,Ti,V,Cr)4Ti2]Si5 alloy. The mineral occurs as euhedral crystals < 1–14 μm in size. It is transparent with a light bluish-green color. The Gladstone–Dale relationship gives n = 1.828.
Mizraite-(Ce) (Table 4) exhibits an empirical formula (based on 19 O pfu) of (Ce0.76Ca0.10La0.07Nd0.01)Σ0.94(Al10.43Mg0.84Ti3+0.60Si0.09Zr0.04)Σ12.00O19. The simplified formula is (Ce,Ca,La)(Al,Mg,Ti3+)12O19. The ideal formula is Ce(Al11Mg)O19, which requires Ce2O3 21.45, Al2O3 73.28, MgO 5.27, total 100 wt%.
The EBSD patterns can be indexed only by the hexagonal P63/mmc magnetoplumbite structure and match the Ce-bearing hibonite cell of [40] (Figure 11), with a mean angular deviation of 0.32°–0.37°, revealing the following cell parameters: a = 5.61(1) Å, c = 22.29(1) Å, V = 608(2) Å3, and Z = 2. The calculated density is 4.16 g·cm−3 using the empirical formula and the unit-cell volume estimated from the EBSD data.
Mizraite-(Ce) is the Ce-analog of hibonite, and is a new member of the magnetoplumbite group (A[B12]O19; [16]); it is the first member presenting the heterovalent substitution A2+ + B3+A3+ + B2+ (Ca2+ + Al3+REE3+ + Mg2+) as the dominant species-defining exchange. Whenever another magnetoplumbite REE-dominant mineral is described, it would represent a new subgroup along with the magnetoplumbite (A = Pb), hawthorneite (A = Ba), and hibonite (A = Ca) subgroups. Hibonite has a general formula of (Ca,Ce)(Al,Ti,Mg)12O19 and an ideal formula of CaAl12O19. Synthetic Ce(Al11Mg)O19 is not reported, whereas La(Al11Mg)O19, La(Al11Mn)O19, and La(Al11Ni)O19 with the hibonite structure have been synthesized [41,42,43]. Terrestrial hibonite often contains minor Ce and other REEs and has a general formula of (Ca,Ce)(Al,Ti,Mg)12O19 [40,44]. Reported here is the first natural occurrence of Ce(Al11Mg)O19, although zoned “hibonite” grains with REE-rich cores (ΣREE > 0.6 atoms per formula unit) have been described by [45] where kalsilite, leucite, and hibonite occur together with spinel, corundum, sphene, perovskite, Ti-phlogopite, and K-feldspar in a granulite-facies gneiss in the Punalur district in Kerala, southern India. The structure of mizraite-(Ce) has the topology of the magnetoplumbite group minerals with Ln3+(Al11M2+)O19 stoichiometry and is made of two structural layers: the hexagonal close-packed R-block, containing the Ln3+ site, the trigonal bipyramidal M2 site, and the octahedral face-sharing M4 site; and the cubic close-packed S-block, containing layers of M5 octahedra interspaced by the M3 tetrahedra and the M1 octahedra (Figure 12). The spinel blocks contain most of the Al3+ in the M1 and M5 sites, and M2+ cations are distributed among the octahedral and tetrahedral sites. The Ln3+ and remaining Al3+ cations are localized in mirror planes, whereas M4 octahedra containing high-charge small cations lie on both sides of the mirror plane (Figure 12). The separation between the two Ln3+ sites of the same mirror plane is equal to the a unit cell parameter (ca. 5.6 Å), whereas between two different mirror planes it is approximately 11 Å.

3.5. Yeite

Yeite occurs with wenjiite (Ti5Si3) and zhiqinite (TiSi2) in Ti-Si alloy inclusions in corundum Grain 198c (Figure 13). Other inclusions in this corundum grain contain type griffinite (Al2TiO5) [14], rutile, baddeleyite, hibonite, osbornite, khamrabaevite, Ti,Al,Zr-oxide, zirconolite, and jingsuiite. Yeite occurs as irregular-subhedral crystals 1.2–3.5 μm in size. It is opaque and shows a black color.
The chemical composition of yeite (Table 5) gives rise to an empirical formula (based on 2 atoms pfu) of (Ti0.995Mn0.003V0.001Cr0.001)(Si0.996P0.004). The simplified formula is TiSi. The ideal formula is TiSi, which requires Ti 63.04, Si 36.96, total 100 wt%. Associated wenjiite has an empirical formula (Ti3.70Mn0.43Cr0.07V0.02)Si3.68. Zhiqinite has an empirical formula Ti0.99Si2.01.
The EBSD patterns of yeite can be indexed only by the orthorhombic Pnma FeB-type structure and match the synthetic TiSi cells of [46,47] (Figure 14), with a mean angular deviation of 0.23°–0.32°, revealing the following cell parameters: a = 6.55(1) Å, b = 3.64(1) Å, c = 4.99(1) Å, V = 119.0(4) Å3, and Z = 4. The calculated density is 4.24 g·cm−3 using the empirical formula and the unit-cell volume estimated from the EBSD data.
In the structure of yeite, each Si atom is coordinated with seven Ti atoms, forming SiTi7 polyhedra (capped trigonal prism, <Si-Ti> = 2.638 Å, distortion index = 0.01259) that share edges, building up a three-dimensional framework (Figure 15). The structure can be also described as TiSi7 polyhedra (<Si-Ti> = 2.636 Å, distortion index = 0.01245), with an odder shape, sharing edges.
Yeite is natural TiSi with the Pnma FeB-type structure. Synthetic TiSi with the Pnma FeB-type structure is well known [46,47]. To our knowledge, yeite is not related to other minerals. Other Ti-Si minerals include zhiqinite with an orthorhombic Fddd TiSi2-type structure [48], kangjinlaite (Ti11Si10) with a tetragonal I4/mmm Ho11Ge10-type structure [49], and a special wenjiite (Ti5Si3) with a hexagonal P63/mcm Mn5Si3-type structure identified in this study.

4. Discussion

The oxide minerals described here are high-temperature phases. They crystallized from melts that were trapped in intracrystalline and interstitial voids in aggregates of corundum crystals [2]. The whole suite of corundum xenoliths is characterized by oxygen fugacity (fO2) below the levels normally encountered in Earth’s upper mantle or crust (IW to IW-9; [50]). We recognize three broad paragenetic types.
Crn-A: these are hopper to skeletal crystals showing strong zoning in Ti due to the uptake of Ti3+ during rapid crystal growth [51]. The composition of the trapped melts is Ca-Mg-Al silicates showing high contents of S as well as incompatible elements. Phase assemblages reflect low fO2, with all Ti as Ti3+ (e.g., tistarite).
Crn-B: these are large homogeneous (unzoned) corundum crystals, which typically show Ti contents > 1 wt%. In these crystals, interstitial pockets contain small amounts of glass, which are typically high in REE, Zr, and other incompatible elements. In phenocrysts, Ti is present as both Ti3+ and Ti4+.
Crn-C: these are texturally similar to Crn-B; however, the Ti contents in corundum are typically low (<0.5 wt% Ti). Rare glasses are rich in LREE and Ba. The presence of more Ti4+ phases (rutile, griffinite) suggests higher mean fO2 than in Crn-A and Crn-B. Hibonite occurs in all three parageneses; in Crn-A and Crn-B, it contains high levels of Ti3+, whereas in Crn-C, the Ti3+ contents are very low.
Magnéliite, sassite, and ziroite are members of a large population of Ti-Al-Zr phases, which include carmeltazite, griffinite, tistarite, rutile, “Allende-like” Ti-Zr-Al oxide [35], kaitianite [52], and many as yet undescribed minerals (Figure 16). Part of this variety is due to the presence of Ti as both Ti3+ and Ti4+, reflecting the differences in fO2 among the three parageneses. Individual phases may show large ranges in solid solution, reflecting substitutions of trivalent (Ti3+, Al) and quadrivalent (Ti4+, Zr) ions.
Magnéliite shows some solid solution of both ZrO2 and Al2O3 (Table 1); it has crystallized from a glass, residual after the crystallization of large hibonite crystals. The type magnéliite is associated with alabandite, which suggests that both crystallized during the ascent of the xenoliths as decreasing pressure led to lower solubility of sulfur in the melt. This assemblage and the low Ti in corundum (0.4 wt% Ti) are characteristic of paragenesis Crn-C.
Sassite is clearly a liquidus phase (Figure 4) together with a Ti-Al-Zr oxide and corundum; the reconstructed melt in these interstitial pockets is low in Si and Ca and very high in Ti, while the residual melt is Al, Si-rich. Sassite shows a very wide range of solid solution toward griffinite (Al2TiO5 [14]; Figure 16). The presence of alabandite and baddeleyite suggests quench crystallization during ascent of the xenolith, which is consistent with the quench crystallization of mullite at low P. This is a typical Crn-B paragenesis.
Ziroite can have a significant solid solution of TiO2 (Table 3; Figure 16). The ability of ziroite to take up Ti can explain the coexistence of ziroite and baddeleyite (Figure 7), as the latter does not appear to take up much Ti. Like sassite, the type ziroite has crystallized from a Ca-Mg-Al-silicate glass, residual after the crystallization of hibonite and a Ti-Al-Zr oxide, in a typical Crn-B paragenesis.
Mizraite-(Ce) is also clearly a liquidus phase, crystallizing from a residual melt high in LREE and S. Its occurrence as interstitial to large exsolved spinel grains suggests that it belongs to paragenesis Crn-B, although the low Ti content of the adjacent corundum (0.4 wt%) is more characteristic of Crn-C.
The study of mixed-valence phases in paragenesis Crn-B, and possibly in Crn-C, provides new information on the interpretation of the origins of the Mt. Carmel corundum-aggregate xenoliths. While the different parageneses share many common features, it has proven difficult to establish common lines of descent between them.
The alloy phases, including yeite as described here, appear as inclusions in aggregates of corundum crystals; they represent trapped melts, melts + crystals, and subsolidus assemblages that formed from the melts on cooling, both prior to eruption and during quenching upon eruption of the host basalts [6]. The immiscible separation of these melts from the coexisting silicate melt under highly reducing conditions allowed the crystallization of Fe-free phases from the silicate melt(s). The chemistry and evolution of these melts through multiple stages of immiscibility have been described in [6]; yeite adds more detail to this picture.
Yeite occurs in spheroidal balls (Figure 13) interpreted as immiscible melts coexisting with the silicate melt from which the enclosing corundum was crystallizing. The smooth, straight, or irregular boundaries between yeite, wenjiite, and zhiqinite suggest that the original melt may have decomposed into mutually immiscible melts or crystallized into the three coexisting phases. However, examination of the phase diagram for the Ti-Si Si binary [53] suggests that the situation was more complex (Figure 17).
This binary is separated into two subsystems by a thermal divide at Ti3Si2; the assemblage TiSi+TiSi2 appears (crystallizes) at a eutectic point (1743 K) on the Si side of the divide, while wenjiite crystallizes from melts on the Ti side of the divide from 2400 K to a eutectic (L → Ti + Ti5Si3) at 1613 K. There is no point at which TiSi coexists with Ti5Si3. However, the average reconstructed composition of the melts in Figure 13 lies near several cotectics (1773–1673 K) in the Fe-Ti-Si ternary system (Figure 18) [54], making it probable that three phases may have crystallized from the melt over a very short T range in the high-temperature part of this ternary system. As noted by [6], the temperatures in the natural system beneath Mt. Carmel probably were lower than those in the synthetic systems due to the coexistence of a fluid phase rich in H2, which can lower temperatures in metallic systems by up to several hundred degrees [55].
These alloy minerals thus illustrate the wide range of immiscible-melt compositions and crystallization conditions captured in the xenoliths from Mt. Carmel and give some new insights into processes in this highly reduced magmatic system. This highly reduced corundum-related assemblage is not simply a one-locality oddity; very similar associations have been reported from the Luobusa ophiolite in SE Tibet [48,49] and from many other localities in intraplate and subduction-zone tectonic settings [2,6]. These occurrences imply a significant role for mantle-derived CH4+H2 fluids in magmatic processes.

5. Conclusions

Reported here is the discovery of five new minerals, magnéliite (Ti3+2Ti4+2O7), ziroite (ZrO2), sassite (Ti3+2Ti4+O5), mizraite-(Ce) (Ce(Al11Mg)O19), and yeite (TiSi), in melt inclusions in corundum xenocrysts from the Mt. Carmel area, Israel. The description of their chemical composition and the crystal structures of the synthetic analogues that match the EBSD data is provided. Many physical properties cannot be obtained because of the extremely reduced dimensions of the grains (nano scale), but the data are sufficient to support their correct identification. These minerals are high-temperature oxide or alloy phases formed under extremely reduced conditions in the upper mantle, and provide new, important insights into the natural origin of super-reduced mineral assemblages.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.M., F.C., L.B. and W.L.G.; Methodology, C.M.; Formal analysis, C.M., F.C., L.B. and W.L.G.; Investigation, C.M., F.C., L.B. and W.L.G.; Resources, V.T.; Data curation, C.M.; Writing—original draft, C.M.; Writing—review & editing, C.M., F.C., L.B. and W.L.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was funded by MIUR-PRIN2017, project “TEOREM deciphering geological processes using Terrestrial and Extraterrestrial ORE Minerals”, prot. 2017AK8C32 (PI: Luca Bindi).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

SEM: EBSD and EPMA analyses were carried out at the Caltech GPS Division Analytical Facility, which is supported, in part, by NSF Grants EAR-0318518 and DMR-0080065. This is contribution 1779 from the ARC Centre of Excellence for Core to Crust Fluid Systems (www.ccfs.mq.edu.au) and 1547 from the GEMOC Key Centre (www.gemoc.mq.edu.au).

Conflicts of Interest

Vered Toledo was employed by Shefa Gems (A.T.M.) Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Xiong, Q.; Griffin, W.L.; Huang, J.-X.; Gain, S.E.M.; Toledo, V.; Pearson, N.J.; O’Reilly, S.Y. Super-reduced mineral assemblages in "ophiolitic" chromitites and peridotites: The view from Mt. Carmel. Eur. J. Mineral. 2017, 29, 557–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Griffin, W.L.; Huang, J.-X.; Thomassot, E.; Gain, S.E.M.; Toledo, V.; O’Reilly, S.Y. Super-reducing conditions in ancient and modern volcanic systems: Sources and behaviour of carbon-rich fluids in the lithospheric mantle. Mineral. Petrol. 2018, 112 (Suppl. S1), 101–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Griffin, W.L.; Bindi, L.; Cámara, F.; Ma, C.; Gain, S.E.M.; Saunders, M.; Alard, O.; Huang, J.-X.; Shaw, J.; Meredith, C.; et al. Interactions of magmas and highly reduced fluids during intraplate volcanism, Mt Carmel, Israel: Implications for mantle redox states and global carbon cycles. Gondwana Res. 2023, 128, 14–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Litasov, K.D.; Kagi, H.; Bekker, T.B. Enigmatic super-reduced phases in corundum from natural rocks: Possible contamination from artificial abrasive materials or metallurgical slags. Lithos 2019, 340–341, 181–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Griffin, W.L.; Toledo, V.; O’Reilly, S.Y. Discussion of “Enigmatic super-reduced phases in corundum from natural rocks: Possible contamination from artificial abrasive materials or metallurgical slags” by Litasov et al. (Lithos, 340–341, p.181–190). Lithos 2019, 348–349, 105122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Griffin, W.L.; Gain, S.E.M.; Saunders, M.; Huang, J.-X.; Alard, O.; Toledo, V.; O’Reilly, S.Y. Immiscible metallic melts in the upper mantle beneath Mount Carmel, Israel: Silicides, phosphides and carbides. Am. Mineral. 2022, 107, 532–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ma, C.; Bindi, L.; Cámara, F.; Toledo, V. Griffinite, IMA 2021–110, in CNMNC Newsletter 66. Mineral. Mag. 2022, 86, 361–362. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ma, C.; Griffin, W.L.; Bindi, L.; Cámara, F.; Toledo, V. Magnéliite, IMA 2021-111, in CNMNC Newsletter 66. Mineral. Mag. 2022, 86, 362. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ma, C.; Griffin, W.L.; Bindi, L.; Cámara, F.; Toledo, V. Ziroite, IMA 2022-013, in CNMNC Newsletter 68. Mineral. Mag. 2022, 86, 854–855. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ma, C.; Griffin, W.L.; Bindi, L.; Cámara, F.; Toledo, V. Sassite, IMA 2022-014, in CNMNC Newsletter 68. Mineral. Mag. 2022, 86, 855. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ma, C.; Griffin, W.L.; Bindi, L.; Cámara, F.; Toledo, V. Mizraite-(Ce), IMA 2022-027, in CNMNC Newsletter 68. Mineral. Mag. 2022, 86, 857. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ma, C.; Griffin, W.L.; Bindi, L.; Cámara, F. Toledoite, IMA 2022-036, in CNMNC Newsletter 66. Mineral. Mag. 2022, 86, 858. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ma, C.; Griffin, W.L.; Bindi, L.; Cámara, F.; Toledo, V. Yeite, IMA 2022-079, in CNMNC Newsletter 70. Mineral. Mag. 2022, 87, 165. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ma, C.; Cámara, F.; Toledo, V.; Bindi, L. Griffinite, Al2TiO5: A new oxide mineral from inclusions in corundum xenocrysts from the Mount Carmel area, Israel. Crystals 2023, 13, 1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Andersson, S.; Magnéli, A. Diskrete Titanoxydphasen im Zusammensetzungsbereich TiO1,75-TiO1,90. Naturwissenschaften 1956, 43, 495–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Holtstam, D.; Hålenius, U. Nomenclature of the magnetoplumbite group. Mineral. Mag. 2020, 84, 376–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Griffin, W.L.; Gain, S.E.M.; Adams, D.T.; Huang, J.-X.; Saunders, M.; Toledo, V.; Pearson, N.J.; O’Reilly, S.Y. First terrestrial occurrence of tistarite (Ti2O3): Ultra-low oxygen fugacity in the upper mantle beneath Mt Carmel, Israel. Geology 2016, 44, 815–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Griffin, W.L.; Gain, S.E.M.; Huang, J.-X.; Saunders, M.; Shaw, J.; Toledo, V.; O’Reilly, S.Y. A terrestrial magmatic hibonite-grossite-vanadium assemblage: Desilication and extreme reduction in a volcanic plumbing system, Mt Carmel, Israel. Am. Mineral. 2019, 104, 207–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Armstrong, J.T. CITZAF: A package of correction programs for the quantitative electron microbeam X-ray analysis of thick polished materials, thin films, and particles. Microbeam Anal. 1995, 4, 177–200. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ma, C.; Rossman, G.R. Barioperovskite, BaTiO3, a new mineral from the Benitoite Mine, California. Am. Mineral. 2008, 93, 154–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ma, C.; Rossman, G.R. Tistarite, Ti2O3, a new refractory mineral from the Allende meteorite. Am. Mineral. 2009, 94, 841–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mandarino, J.A. The Gladstone-Dale relationship. I. Derivation of new constants. Can. Mineral. 1976, 14, 498–502. [Google Scholar]
  23. Marezio, M.; Dernier, P.D. The crystal structure of Ti4O7, a member of the homologous series TinO2n−1. J. Solid State Chem. 1971, 3, 340–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Marezio, M.; McWhan, D.B.; Dernier, P.D.; Remeika, J.P. Structural aspect of the metal-insulator transition in Ti4O7. J. Solid State Chem. 1973, 6, 213–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. le Page, Y.; Marezio, M. Structural chemistry of magnéli phases tin O(2n − 1) (4< n< 9) IV. Superstructure in Ti4O7 at 140 K. J. Solid State Chem. 1984, 53, 13–21. [Google Scholar]
  26. Zhang, Q.; Liu, W.; Zhou, Y.; Li, J.; Sun, T.; Liu, Q.; Ma, Y.; Wang, J.; Li, J.; Zhao, R.; et al. Andersson-Magnéli phases TinO2n−1: Recent progress inspired by Swedish scientists. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2021, 647, 126–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Momma, K.; Izumi, F. VESTA 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2011, 44, 1272–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bondars, B.; Heidemane, G.; Grabis, J.; Laschke, K.; Boysen, H.; Schneider, J.; Frey, F. Powder diffraction investigations of plasma sprayed zirconia. J. Mater. Sci. 1995, 30, 1621–1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Howard, C.J.; Kisi, E.H.; Roberts, R.B.; Hill, R.J. Neutron diffraction studies of phase transformations between tetragonal and orthorhombic zirconia in magnesia-partiallystabilized zirconia. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1990, 73, 2828–2833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bouvier, P.; Djurado, E.; Lucazeau, G.; Le Bihan, T. High-pressure structural evolution of undoped tetragonal nanocrystalline zirconia. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2000, 62, 8731–8737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Onoda, M. Phase transitions of Ti3O5. J. Solid State Chem. 1998, 136, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rusakov, A.A.; Zhdanov, G.S. The crystal structure and the chemical formula of titanic oxide Ti3O5 (Anosovite). Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 1951, 77, 411–414. [Google Scholar]
  33. Åsbrink, S.; Magnéli, A. Crystal structure studies on trititanium pentoxide, Ti3O5. Acta Cryst. 1959, 12, 575–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hong, S.-H.; Åsbrink, S. The structure of γ-Ti3O5 at 297 K. Acta Cryst. 1982, 38, 2570–2576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ma, C.; Beckett, J.R. Kaitianite, Ti3+2Ti4+O5, a new titanium oxide mineral from Allende. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 2021, 56, 96–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Åsbrink, G.; Åsbrink, S.; Magnéli, A.; Okinaka, H.; Kosuge, K.; Kachi, S. A Ti3O5 modification of V3O5-type structure. Acta Chem. Scand. 1971, 25, 3889–3890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Åsbrink, S.; Pietraszko, A. Bond diffractometer measurements on Ti3O5 in the temperature region 90 to 720 K. Phys. Status Solidi A 1991, 128, K77–K81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ohkoshi, S.; Tsunobuchi, Y.; Matsuda, T.; Hashimoto, K.; Namai, A.; Hakoe, F.; Tokoro, H. Synthesis of a metal oxide with a room-temperature photoreversible phase transition. Nat. Chem. 2010, 2, 539–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, A.C.; Ma, C.; Sakamoto, N.; Wang, R.C.; Hsu, W.B.; Yurimoto, H. Mineralogical anatomy and implications of a Ti–Sc-rich ultrarefractory inclusion from Sayh al Uhaymir 290 CH3 chondrite. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2015, 163, 27–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bermanec, V.; Holtstam, D.; Sturman, D.; Criddle, A.J.; Back, M.E.; Scavnicar, S. Nezilovite, a new member of the magnetoplumbite group, and the crystal chemistry of mognetoplumbite and hibonite. Can. Mineral. 1996, 34, 1287–1297. [Google Scholar]
  41. Efremov, V.A.; Chernaya, N.G.; Trunov, V.K.; Pisarenko, V.F. Crystal structure of lanthanum magnesium hexaaluminate. Kristallografiya 1988, 33, 38–42. [Google Scholar]
  42. Gasperin, M.; Saine, M.C.; Kahn, A.; Laville, F.; Lejus, A.M. Influence of M2+ ions substitution on the structure of lanthanum hexaaluminates with magnetoplumbite structure. J. Solid State Chem. 1984, 54, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Laville, F.; Perrin, M.; Lejus, A.M.; Gasperin, M.; Moncorge, R.; Vivien, D. Synthesis, crystal growth, structural determination, and optical absorption spectroscopy of the magnetoplumbite type compound LaNiAl11O19. J. Solid State Chem. 1986, 65, 301–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Curien, H.; Guillemin, C.; Orcel, J.; Sternberg, M. La hibonite, nouvelle espèce minérale. Comptes Rendus Hebd. Des Séances De L’académie Des Sci. 1956, 242, 2845–2847. [Google Scholar]
  45. Sandiford, M.; Santosh, M. A granulite facies kalsilite-leucite-hibonite association from Punalur, Southern India. Mineral. Petrol. 1991, 43, 225–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Brukl, C.E.; Nowotny, H.; Schob, O.; Benesovsky, F. Die Kristallstrukturen von TiSi, Ti(Al,Si)2 und Mo(Al,Si)2. Monatshefte Fuer Chem. 1961, 92, 781–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Svechnikov, V.N.; Kocherzhinskii, Y.A.; Yupko, L.M.; Kulik, O.G.; Shishkin, E.A. Phase diagram of the titanium-silicon system. Dokl. Chem. Technol. 1970, 193, 82–85. [Google Scholar]
  48. Xiong, F.; Xu, X.; Mugnaioli, E.; Gemmi, M.; Wirth, R.; Grew, E.S.; Robinson, P.T.; Yang, J. Two new minerals, badengzhuite, TiP, and zhiqinite, TiSi2, from the Cr-11 chromitite orebody, Luobusa ophiolite, Tibet, China: Is this evidence for super-reduced mantle-derived fluids? Eur. J. Mineral. 2020, 32, 557–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Xiong, F.; Xu, X.; Mugnaioli, E.; Gemmi, M.; Wirth, R.; Yang, J.; Grew, E.S. Wenjiite, Ti10(Si,P,□)7, and kangjinlaite, Ti11(Si,P)10, new minerals in the ternary Ti-P-Si system from the Luobusa ophiolite, Tibet, China. Am. Mineral. 2023, 108, 197–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Griffin, W.L.; Gain, S.E.M.; Cámara, F.; Bindi, L.; Shaw, J.; Alard, O.; Saunders, M.; Huang, J.-X.; Toledo, V.; O’Reilly, S.Y. Extreme reduction: Mantle-derived oxide xenoliths from a hydrogen-rich environment. Lithos 2020, 358–359, 105404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Oliviera, B.B.; Griffin, W.L.; Gain, S.E.M.; Saunders, M.; Shaw, J.; Toledo, V.; Afonso, J.C.; O’Reilly, S.Y. Ti3+ in corundum: Tracing crystal growth in a highly reduced magma. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 2439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Ma, C.; Cámara, F.; Bindi, L.; Toledo, V.; Griffin, W.L. First terrestrial occurrence of kaitianite (Ti3+2Ti4+O5) from the upper mantle beneath Mount Carmel, Israel. Minerals 2023, 13, 1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Fiore, M.; Beneduce, F.; Azevado, C.R.d.F. Simplification of the thermodynamic description of the Ti-Si system. Tecnol. Em Metal. Mater. Mineração 2016, 13, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Weitzer, F.; Schuster, J.C.; Naka, M.; Stein, F.; Palm, M. On the reaction scheme and liquidus surface in the ternary system Fe-Si-Ti. Intermetallics 2008, 16, 273–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Fukai, Y. The Metal-Hydrogen System: Basic Bulk Properties. In Springer Series in Materials Science, 2nd ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2005; Volume 21, 500p. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. BSE images showing magnéliite (Ti4O7) in corundum Grain 767-1. The rectangular area in (a) is enlarged in (b).
Figure 1. BSE images showing magnéliite (Ti4O7) in corundum Grain 767-1. The rectangular area in (a) is enlarged in (b).
Materials 16 07578 g001
Figure 2. (left) EBSD patterns of the magnéliite crystal in Figure 1 at different orientations, and (right) the patterns indexed with the P 1 ¯ Ti4O7-type structure. Blue cross marks the pattern center.
Figure 2. (left) EBSD patterns of the magnéliite crystal in Figure 1 at different orientations, and (right) the patterns indexed with the P 1 ¯ Ti4O7-type structure. Blue cross marks the pattern center.
Materials 16 07578 g002
Figure 3. Detail of the structure of magnéliite (using the atom coordinates form Marezio and Dernier, 1971) projected onto (−556), showing the chains of four-member units of edge-sharing Ti-centered octahedra. Figure obtained using Vesta 3.0 [27].
Figure 3. Detail of the structure of magnéliite (using the atom coordinates form Marezio and Dernier, 1971) projected onto (−556), showing the chains of four-member units of edge-sharing Ti-centered octahedra. Figure obtained using Vesta 3.0 [27].
Materials 16 07578 g003
Figure 4. BSE images showing ziroite (ZrO2) in corundum Grain 479-1a. The rectangular area in (a) is enlarged in (b). The rectangular area in (b) is enlarged in (c).
Figure 4. BSE images showing ziroite (ZrO2) in corundum Grain 479-1a. The rectangular area in (a) is enlarged in (b). The rectangular area in (b) is enlarged in (c).
Materials 16 07578 g004aMaterials 16 07578 g004b
Figure 5. (left) EBSD patterns of the ziroite crystals in Figure 4, and (right) the patterns indexed with the P42/nmc zirconia(HT)-type. Blue cross marks the pattern center.
Figure 5. (left) EBSD patterns of the ziroite crystals in Figure 4, and (right) the patterns indexed with the P42/nmc zirconia(HT)-type. Blue cross marks the pattern center.
Materials 16 07578 g005
Figure 6. The structure of ziroite. Figure obtained using Vesta 3.0 [27].
Figure 6. The structure of ziroite. Figure obtained using Vesta 3.0 [27].
Materials 16 07578 g006
Figure 7. BSE images showing sassite (Ti3+2Ti4+O5) in corundum Grain 1125C1. The rectangular area in (a) is enlarged in (b). The rectangular area in (b) is enlarged in (c).
Figure 7. BSE images showing sassite (Ti3+2Ti4+O5) in corundum Grain 1125C1. The rectangular area in (a) is enlarged in (b). The rectangular area in (b) is enlarged in (c).
Materials 16 07578 g007
Figure 8. (left) EBSD patterns of two sassite crystals in Figure 7, and (right) the patterns indexed with the Cmcm pseudobrookite-type Ti3O5 structure. Blue cross marks the pattern center.
Figure 8. (left) EBSD patterns of two sassite crystals in Figure 7, and (right) the patterns indexed with the Cmcm pseudobrookite-type Ti3O5 structure. Blue cross marks the pattern center.
Materials 16 07578 g008
Figure 9. Detail of the structure of sassite (using atom coordinates form Onoda 1998) projected onto (010), showing the chains of TiO6 octahedra along [001] sharing edges and vertexes. Figure obtained using Vesta 3.0 [27].
Figure 9. Detail of the structure of sassite (using atom coordinates form Onoda 1998) projected onto (010), showing the chains of TiO6 octahedra along [001] sharing edges and vertexes. Figure obtained using Vesta 3.0 [27].
Materials 16 07578 g009
Figure 10. BSE images showing mizraite-(Ce) in corundum Grain 198-8. The rectangular areas in (a) are enlarged in (b,c).
Figure 10. BSE images showing mizraite-(Ce) in corundum Grain 198-8. The rectangular areas in (a) are enlarged in (b,c).
Materials 16 07578 g010
Figure 11. (left) EBSD patterns of two mizraite-(Ce) crystals in Figure 10, and (right) the patterns indexed with the P63/mmc hibonite structure. Blue cross marks the pattern center.
Figure 11. (left) EBSD patterns of two mizraite-(Ce) crystals in Figure 10, and (right) the patterns indexed with the P63/mmc hibonite structure. Blue cross marks the pattern center.
Materials 16 07578 g011
Figure 12. Detail of magnetoplumbite-type structure of mizraite-(Ce), showing the interlayering of S- and R-blocks. Ln3+ cations are located in the R-blocks along with the M2 and M4 sites. Figure obtained using Vesta 3.0 [27].
Figure 12. Detail of magnetoplumbite-type structure of mizraite-(Ce), showing the interlayering of S- and R-blocks. Ln3+ cations are located in the R-blocks along with the M2 and M4 sites. Figure obtained using Vesta 3.0 [27].
Materials 16 07578 g012
Figure 13. BSE images showing yeite (TiSi) with wenjiite (Ti5Si3) and zhiqinite (TiSi2) in corundum Grain 198c. The rectangular areas in (a) are enlarged in (b,c).
Figure 13. BSE images showing yeite (TiSi) with wenjiite (Ti5Si3) and zhiqinite (TiSi2) in corundum Grain 198c. The rectangular areas in (a) are enlarged in (b,c).
Materials 16 07578 g013
Figure 14. (left) EBSD patterns of yeite in Figure 13 at different orientations, and (right) the patterns indexed with the Pnma TiSi structure. Blue cross marks the pattern center.
Figure 14. (left) EBSD patterns of yeite in Figure 13 at different orientations, and (right) the patterns indexed with the Pnma TiSi structure. Blue cross marks the pattern center.
Materials 16 07578 g014
Figure 15. The structure of yeite (using the atom coordinates published by [46]). SiTi7 capped triangular prims in blue. The polyhedra share edges. Figure obtained using Vesta 3.0 [27].
Figure 15. The structure of yeite (using the atom coordinates published by [46]). SiTi7 capped triangular prims in blue. The polyhedra share edges. Figure obtained using Vesta 3.0 [27].
Materials 16 07578 g015
Figure 16. Ti-Al-Zr triplot showing phases from melt inclusions in corundum xenocrysts from the Mt. Carmel area, from [52].
Figure 16. Ti-Al-Zr triplot showing phases from melt inclusions in corundum xenocrysts from the Mt. Carmel area, from [52].
Materials 16 07578 g016
Figure 17. Calculated Ti-Si phase diagram from [53].
Figure 17. Calculated Ti-Si phase diagram from [53].
Materials 16 07578 g017
Figure 18. Liquidus projection for Fe-Si-Ti, modified from [54].
Figure 18. Liquidus projection for Fe-Si-Ti, modified from [54].
Materials 16 07578 g018
Table 1. EPMA analytical results (in wt%, n = 7) for magnéliite.
Table 1. EPMA analytical results (in wt%, n = 7) for magnéliite.
ConstituentMeanRangeSD (σ)Probe Standard
TiO2 *53.5453.28–53.930.17TiO2
Ti2O3 *38.6338.44–38.840.12TiO2
ZrO23.022.86–3.200.11zircon
Al2O32.202.03–2.260.08anorthite
MgO1.361.26–1.510.09forsterite
CaO0.190.17–0.200.01anorthite
Sc2O30.220.20–0.230.01ScPO4
Total99.16
* Total titanium has been partitioned between Ti3+ and Ti4+ for charge balance to make ideal stoichiometry.
Table 2. EPMA analytical results (in wt%, n = 8) for ziroite.
Table 2. EPMA analytical results (in wt%, n = 8) for ziroite.
ConstituentMeanRangeSD (σ)Probe Standard
ZrO278.5276.06–79.921.18zircon
TiO218.2116.68–20.471.18TiO2
HfO21.431.35–1.540.08Hf metal
MgO0.700.62–0.750.05forsterite
Al2O30.870.81–0.950.05anorthite
Total99.73
Table 3. EPMA analytical results (in wt%, n = 13) for sassite.
Table 3. EPMA analytical results (in wt%, n = 13) for sassite.
ConstituentMeanRangeSD (σ)Probe Standard
Ti2O3 *45.3244.81–45.940.30TiO2
TiO2 *37.3236.90–37.830.24TiO2
Al2O311.7310.22–13.020.83anorthite
ZrO23.703.05–5.040.68zircon
MgO1.290.97–1.660.24forsterite
SiO20.240.15–0.460.08anorthite
MnO0.150.10–0.200.04Mn2SiO4
CaO0.070.05–0.120.02ScPO4
Total99.82
* Total titanium has been partitioned between Ti3+ and Ti4+ for charge balance to achieve ideal stoichiometry.
Table 4. EPMA analytical results (in wt%, n = 8) for mizraite-(Ce).
Table 4. EPMA analytical results (in wt%, n = 8) for mizraite-(Ce).
ConstituentMeanRangeSD (σ)Probe Standard
Al2O369.7569.41–70.070.23Al2O3
Ce2O316.3016.13–16.500.14CePO4
* Ti2O35.675.64–5.750.04TiO2
MgO4.454.37–4.510.04forsterite
La2O31.471.40–1.560.06LaPO4
SiO20.720.69–0.790.03anorthite
CaO0.710.69–0.730.02anorthite
ZrO20.670.43–0.810.12zircon
Nd2O30.290.25–0.350.04NdPO4
Total100.02
* Titanium has been assigned to be Ti3+ for charge balance to achieve best stoichiometry.
Table 5. EPMA analytical results (in wt%, n = 7) for yeite.
Table 5. EPMA analytical results (in wt%, n = 7) for yeite.
ConstituentMeanRangeSD (σ)Probe Standard
Ti62.3462.11–62.710.21Ti metal
Si36.5936.47–36.780.10Si metal
P0.180.13–0.250.05GaP
Mn0.180.14–0.310.06Mn2SiO4
Cr0.080.00–0.130.04Cr metal
V0.060.00–0.170.06V metal
Fe0.000.000.00Fe metal
Total99.43
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ma, C.; Cámara, F.; Bindi, L.; Toledo, V.; Griffin, W.L. New Minerals from Inclusions in Corundum Xenocrysts from Mt. Carmel, Israel: Magnéliite, Ziroite, Sassite, Mizraite-(Ce) and Yeite. Materials 2023, 16, 7578. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16247578

AMA Style

Ma C, Cámara F, Bindi L, Toledo V, Griffin WL. New Minerals from Inclusions in Corundum Xenocrysts from Mt. Carmel, Israel: Magnéliite, Ziroite, Sassite, Mizraite-(Ce) and Yeite. Materials. 2023; 16(24):7578. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16247578

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ma, Chi, Fernando Cámara, Luca Bindi, Vered Toledo, and William L. Griffin. 2023. "New Minerals from Inclusions in Corundum Xenocrysts from Mt. Carmel, Israel: Magnéliite, Ziroite, Sassite, Mizraite-(Ce) and Yeite" Materials 16, no. 24: 7578. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16247578

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop