Correction: Białobrzeska, B.; Jasiński, R. Resistance to Abrasive Wear with Regards to Mechanical Properties Using Low-Alloy Cast Steels Examined with the Use of a Dry Sand/Rubber Wheel Tester. Materials 2023, 16, 3052

This manuscript is a resubmission of an earlier submission. The following is a list of the peer review reports and author responses from that submission.

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Cosidering that the authors have properly answered to all the main issues of the first revision i suggest publication for this work.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

Once again, we would like to thank you for reviewing our manuscript and recommending it for publication. Please look at the attached certificate that confirms that the manuscript has been reviewed by a native speaker. If you have additional questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

                                                                                              With regards

                                                                                              Authors

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Article entitled “Resistance to abrasive wear with regards to mechanical properties using low-alloy cast steels examined with the use of a dry sand/rubber wheel tester” has been reviewed. The authors have done a different and beautiful work. But, there are few things need to be corrected and included in the manuscript for better understanding of carried research work to the readers. 1- The novelty of the study should be further explained (in introduction…). 2- More references (different studies) should be added to the introduction. (recent studies, 2020-2022). 3- it will be useful to give general information about different studies. Also, more information should be given about the materials used in the study. 4- More information on tensile testing should be given in the "Materials and Methods  " section. (Crosshead speed, humidity, ambient temperature (as value), etc.) The dimensions of the samples should be given in 3D (or tech. drawing). How was the crosshead speed determined? (and ? mm/min) 5- Conclusions section should be enriched a little more. (especially with values) 6- More literature studies should be added to the introduction and other sections (DOIs given). DOI-1  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-021-06243-w  (info about tensile tests…Crosshead speed, humidity, ambient temperature (as value), etc.) DOI-2  https://doi.org/10.26701/ems.989945 (info about tensile tests…Crosshead speed, humidity, ambient temperature (as value), etc.) 7- The article will be ready for publication after the specified revisions are made. After revision, I would like to review the article again.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

We would like to thank you for reading and evaluating our article and pointing out things we can improve. Below are the answers to your questions. If you have additional questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

                                                                                            With regards

                                                                                             Authors

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Paper entitled "Resistance to abrasive wear with regards to mechanical properties using low-alloy cast steels examined with the use of a dry sand/rubber wheel tester" has been reviewed.

The authors have revised the paper carefully and the revised version could be published in the journal.

Decision- Accept

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

we would like to thank you for recommending our manuscript for publication.

With regards

Authors