Next Article in Journal
Influence of Undergarments on the Comfort Level of Scoliosis Brace Wearers
Next Article in Special Issue
Gray Model Study of Strength and Pore Structure of Recycled Concrete Powder (RCP) Concrete Based on Low-Field NMR Technology
Previous Article in Journal
Investigation of Hydrogen and Oxygen Evolution on Cobalt-Nanoparticles-Supported Graphitic Carbon Nitride
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Replacing Fine Aggregate with Fly Ash on the Performance of Mortar
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study on the Deterioration Mechanism of Magnesium Oxychloride Cement under an Alkaline Environment

1
Qinghai Provincial Key Laboratory of Nanomaterials and Technology, College of Physics and Electronic Information Engineering, Qinghai Minzu University, Xining 810007, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Advanced Processing and Recycling of Non-Ferrous Metals, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China
3
Key Laboratory of Comprehensive and Highly Efficient Utilization of Salt Lake Resources, Qinghai Institute of Salt Lake, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining 810008, China
4
Key Laboratory of Salt Lake Resources Chemistry of Qinghai Province, Xining 810008, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(17), 5924; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16175924
Submission received: 31 July 2023 / Revised: 22 August 2023 / Accepted: 28 August 2023 / Published: 30 August 2023

Abstract

:
The deterioration process and deterioration mechanism of magnesium oxychloride cement (MOC) in an alkaline environment were studied using a scanning electron microscope (SEM), an X-ray diffractometer (XRD), a Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FT-IR) and a micro-electro-hydraulic servo pressure testing machine to investigate the effects of soaking time in 10 wt.% NaOH solution on the macro- and micro-morphology, phase composition and compressive strength of MOC samples. The results show that the deterioration of MOC samples under an alkaline environment is mainly caused by the alkaline environment providing more OH ions, which can react with 5Mg(OH)2·MgCl2·8H2O (P 5) in the sample. The resulting reaction gives rise to a faster decomposition of 5Mg(OH)2·MgCl2·8H2O (P 5) and a substantial reduction in the strength of the sample, and finally leads to a gradual deterioration of MOC samples. Meanwhile, immersion time exhibits a significant effect on MOC samples. The extension of immersion time coincides with more OH ions entering the sample, and the greater presence of OH ions increases the likelihood that more P 5 will produce a hydrolysis reaction, further resulting in the increased deterioration of the sample. After soaking for 6 h in alkaline media, the main phase composition of the surface layer of an MOC sample changes to MgO and Mg(OH)2, and its microscopic morphology is also dominated by round sheets, giving rise to a sharp decrease in its compressive strength (52.2%). When the immersion time is prolonged to 72 h, OH ions have already immersed into the inner core of the sample, causing the disappearance of P 5 from the whole sample. At the same time, both the surface and inner core of the sample exhibit a disc-shaped morphology, and chalking phenomena also appear on the surface of the sample. This reduces the compressive strength of the sample to 13.5 MPa, only 20% of its compressive strength in water. The compressive strength of the sample after 120 h of immersion is as low as 8.6 MPa, which is lower than that of the sample dipped in water for 21 days (9.5 MPa). As a result, the MOC samples studied in alkaline environments exhibit a faster deterioration rate, mainly because of a faster hydrolysis reaction by P 5, caused by more OH ions.

1. Introduction

Qarhan Salt Lake is a large, comprehensive deposit of potassium and magnesium salts located in the middle and eastern part of Qaidam Basin in Qinghai Province, China. It is mainly composed of liquid mixed with some solids, where the stock of KCl is 2.9862 × 108 t and the content of MgCl2 is 38.5622 × 108 t [1]. Since 1957, scientists have carried out a large number of studies on the development of potash fertilizer and its applications. Now, Qarhan Salt Lake is China’s largest potash production base. However, there are significant quantities of bischofite accumulating in Qarhan Salt Lake after years of potassium extraction and production, forming “magnesium damage.” This seriously affects the surrounding environment. At present, the exploiting the application of magnesium oxychloride cement (MOC) has become an ecological, economic, effective and novel way to solve the problem presented by large amounts of bischofite, in addition to using bischofite to produce metallic magnesium, magnesium oxide, magnesium hydroxide, magnesium compound whisker and other magnesium products [2,3].
MOC, a good adhesive material, is formed in the ternary system composed of MgO, MgCl2 and H2O, which is also called Sorel Cement, and was found by Sorel et al. in 1867 [4,5,6]. MOC possesses a series of advantages including high strength, fast hardening, good elasticity, high surface gloss and a simple preparation process [7]. Today, it is described as an ecological and environmentally friendly material due to its energy-saving, fire prevention, heat insulation and sound insulation properties [8]. Additionally, MOC has a low carbon footprint. Ondřej Jankovský et al. [9] have pointed out that both 3Mg(OH)2‧MgCl2·8H2O (Phase 3) and 5Mg(OH)2·MgCl2·8H2O (Phase 5) in MOC possess the capacity for fast mineral carbonation and have high maximum theoretical values of CO2 uptake capacity. Therefore, MOC is widely used in door core panels, building partition panels, arts and crafts, and transportation boxes.
In recent years, the research on MOC materials has mainly focused on the development of raw materials, performance optimization and functional applications, which has led to a wealth of research achievements [10,11,12,13]. However, there are few studies on the durability of MOC materials, which is not only attributable to their own composition and structure, but also to the external service environment. Different service environments determine the deterioration process and deterioration rate of materials. Furthermore, research on the deterioration mechanism of materials under different service environments can provide engineering experience that enhances the design and optimization of materials. This can significantly reduce the economic cost of the materials while extending their life. For example, Hadi H. Edan et al. [14] studied the durability of eco-efficient, self-compacting concrete (SCC) using partially contained waste walnut shell particles as fine aggregate, and found that the SCC mixture containing 40% WS possessed the lowest compressive strength of 23.7 MPa due to having more empty space and less compactness. Meanwhile, the density, compressive and splitting tensile strengths of all SCC mixes decreased after periods of exposure to both H2SO4 and MgSO4 solution attacks. Nibras Y. Alani et al. [15] investigated the performance of SCC containing nano clay at elevated temperatures and exposed to a MgSO4 attack, and pointed out that the nano clay incorporating SCC specimens possessed higher durability properties. With respect to MOC, so far, the effects of a high salt environment, high heat environment, dry-wet cyclic environment and long-term indoor environment on the deterioration properties of MOC materials have also been reported [16,17,18,19]. However, if MOC materials are exposed to an environment with chemical substances, such as the alkaline environment of a production workshop, they may be damaged by chemical erosion. Yet, there are few reports on the corrosion damage to MOC that may be caused by an alkaline environment. Therefore, it is necessary to study the deterioration performance and process of MOC in an alkaline environment.
In this paper, based on the full immersion experiment, SEM, XRD, FT-IR and micro-electro-hydraulic servo pressure testing machines were used to study the evolutions of the macro- and micro-morphology, quality, phase composition and compressive strength of MOC samples in 10 wt.% NaOH solution with immersion time. Simultaneously, the deterioration process and deterioration mechanism of MOC samples under an alkaline environment were revealed. This would enrich and develop the durability theory concerning MOC materials in special environments.

2. Materials and Experiment

2.1. Principal Raw Materials

Bischofite, a kind of white crystal, is the by-product generated through the extraction of potassium, which originates from Golmu in Qinghai Province. Its chemical composition is mainly MgCl2·6H2O, as listed in Table 1.
Light-burned magnesia comes from the calcination of magnesite produced in Haicheng in Liaoning Province. Its activity is 50.51% and its chemical composition is mainly MgO, as shown in Table 2.

2.2. Preparation of MOC Samples

Firstly, 23.5 wt.% MgCl2 aqueous solution was prepared. Secondly, MOC samples were fabricated on the basis of a 7.2:1:16 molar ratio of active MgO, MgCl2 and H2O. Their detailed preparation process was as follows: light-burned magnesia powders and pre-prepared 23.5 wt.% MgCl2 aqueous solution were mixed evenly via constant stirring to form a slurry, which was injected into a 20 mm × 20 mm × 20 mm cube mold to harden in an indoor environment (at a temperature of 21 ± 1 °C, with 40 ± 1% humidity). After 24 h, the MOC samples were taken out from the mold, and continued to cure for 28 days under an indoor environment. These were the MOC slurry samples, and were labeled as 0 h.

2.3. Immersion Experiment

Firstly, a NaOH aqueous solution with a mass fraction of 10% was prepared, and then the MOC slurry samples were completely soaked in this alkaline solution which was renewed every hour, according to the literature [20]. The samples were taken out from the alkaline media after 1 h, 6 h, 9 h and 12 h, respectively. Meanwhile, the weight and compressive pressure of the samples were tested immediately. The compressive strength of the MOC samples before and after immersion were also separately calculated according to Equation (1). At the same time, their standard deviations were obtained.
P = F 4 × 10
where F is the pressure, viz, the average value of 6 samples, and its unit is KN; 4 is the sample area, and its unit is cm2; P is the ultimate compressive strength of the sample, given in MPa.

2.4. Characterization

A CP513 electronic balance was used to evaluate the weight of the MOC sample, in which 6 parallel specimens were taken, and each specimen was weighed 5 times. The obtained average value was namely the mass of the samples, and the corresponding standard deviations were achieved. Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, SU8010, Hitachi High-Tech, Tokyo, Japan) was used to study the micro-morphology of the sample, and the acceleration voltage was 2.0 kV. Before the analysis, the surface of the sample was sprayed with gold. The phase composition of the sample was detected using an X-ray diffractometer (XRD, D8 Discover, Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) with a copper target as the anode. The scanning angle was 5–80° and the scanning step was 0.02°. A Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FT-IR, Nexus, Thermo-Nicolet, Madison, NY, USA) was applied to test the characteristic peak of the phase composition with a resolution of 4 cm−1 at a scan range from 4000 to 400 cm−1. A micro-electro-hydraulic servo pressure testing machine (model HYE-300B-D, Beijing sanyuweiye testing machine Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) was used to test the compressive pressure of the sample and calculate the compressive strength of the sample under the condition of a loading rate of 2.4 KN/s, according to the Chinese national standard GB/T 17671-1999 [21].

3. Results

3.1. Macroscopic Morphology Analyses

Macroscopic photos of MOC samples soaked in 10 wt.% NaOH solution for different periods of time are shown in Figure 1. It can be seen from Figure 1 that the surface of the MOC slurry sample (0 h) is milky white. With the extension of the immersion time from 6 h to 120 h, the color of the surface of the MOC sample gradually darkens, but the sample still remains intact, and no apparent cracks can be observed. Additionally, there is no serious damage or any falling-off phenomenon occurring at the corners.

3.2. Weight Analyses

Figure 2 presents the weight of the MOC samples dipped in 10 wt.% NaOH media for different periods of time. As can be seen from Figure 2, the quality of the MOC sample before immersion (0 h) is 15.59 g. With prolonging the soaking time, the MOC sample becomes slightly heavy. See 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, 72 h and 120 h presented in Figure 2. This may be due to the fact that the increased content in the sample is greater than the amount that is lost from the sample.

3.3. Compressive Strength Analyses

The relationship between the compressive strength of the MOC samples and the immersion time in 10 wt.% NaOH solution is presented in Figure 3. It can be observed from Figure 3 that the compressive strength of the MOC slurry sample that was steeped for 0 h is 83.7 MPa, but with the extension of soaking time, the compressive strength of the MOC sample gradually decreases, and the reduced extent is much larger. Compared with the compressive strength of the MOC sample before soaking (0 h), the compressive strength of the sample after immersion for 6 h decreased by 52.2%, and it declined by nearly 70% after 12 h. When the immersion time was further extended to 72 h, the compressive strength was only 16.1% of what it was before immersion (0 h). After immersing for 120 h, the compressive strength of the sample is as low as 8.6 MPa. These data indicate that the alkaline environment has a great influence on the mechanical properties of the MOC samples.

3.4. Microscopic Morphology Analyses

Figure 4 displays the micro-morphology of the surface and inner core of the MOC samples steeped in 10 wt.% NaOH solution for different periods of time. It can be seen from Figure 4 that with the extension of soaking time, an obvious alteration in the microscopic morphology of the surface layer and inner core of the sample takes place. The surface and inner core of the MOC slurry sample (0 h) both exhibit a gel-like and rod-like morphology; see Figure 4(a1,a2). They interleave with each other and are relatively compact, which is conducive to improving the mechanical properties of the MOC sample. After soaking for 6 h, a round-sheet morphology appears on the surface of the sample (Figure 4(b1,b2)). This morphology is more obvious when the immersion time is extended to 24 h, but the inner core is still gel-like and rod-like, as presented in Figure 4(d1,d2). It can be observed from Figure 4(e1,e2) that after soaking in alkaline solution for 72 h, the surface layer and inner core of the sample both possess round-sheet morphologies, and the surface layer also presents a granular morphology, indicating that the surface layer of the sample appears affected by a powder phenomenon after the immersion of 72 h. At the same time, the NaOH solution has already penetrated into the inside of the sample. From Figure 4(f1,f2), it can be observed that after 120 h, the chalking phenomenon on the surface of the sample is more serious, and the round-sheet morphology of the inner core is more obvious, which also suggests that the deterioration of the sample is even worse.

3.5. Phase Composition Analyses

According to the literature [22,23], MOC is mainly composed of 5Mg(OH)2·MgCl2·8H2O (abbreviated as 5·1·8 phase, P 5), Mg(OH)2, MgCO3, CaCO3, MgO, SiO2 and other components. Figure 5 shows XRD patterns of the MOC samples dipped in 10 wt.% NaOH solution for different periods of time. As can be seen from Figure 5, compared with the MOC slurry samples (0 h), the diffraction peaks of P 5 in the surface layer of the samples disappear after immersion. Moreover with the extension of soaking time, the diffraction peaks of MgO slightly decrease, yet the diffraction peaks of Mg(OH)2 gradually increase. This indicates that after dipping the MOC samples into the alkaline media, P 5 in the surface layer fades away and the content of MgO slightly declines; however, the content of Mg(OH)2 is augmented.
XRD patterns with respect to the inner cores of MOC samples soaked in 10 wt.% NaOH solution for different periods of time are presented in Figure 6. It can be seen from Figure 6 that compared with the samples before immersion (0 h), the diffraction peaks of P 5 that existed in the inner core of the MOC sample decrease slightly after an immersion time of 6 h, and they almost disappear after 72 h. This indicates that the NaOH solution has already penetrated into the inner core of the sample after being dipped in 10 wt.% NaOH solution for 72 h, resulting in an obvious change in the main phase composition of the inner core of the sample. This is consistent with the results in Figure 4.

3.6. FT-IR Spectra Analyses

Figure 7 displays the FT-IR spectra of the surface layer of the MOC samples soaked in 10 wt.% NaOH solution for different periods of time. Researchers [24,25] have pointed out that the stretching vibration absorption band of the Mg-O bond is near 530 cm−1, which belongs to the characteristic peak of MgO. Between 3330 cm−1 and 3500 cm−1 is the characteristic peak of the vibration of the coordinated water molecules. The sharp absorption peaks at 3670 cm−1 and 3610 cm−1 are the non-aqueous hydroxyl (−OH) stretching vibration peak superimposed on the crystal water, which are the characteristic peaks of P 5. The difference in peak intensity at 3700 cm−1 indicates that the content of Mg(OH)2 is diverse. As can be observed from Figure 7, the characteristic peak near 3610 cm−1 disappears after soaking treatment in comparison with the MOC slurry sample (0 h), indicating that there is no P 5 present in the surface layer of the sample. This effect is produced when the samples suffer from erosion caused by the alkaline solution. At the same time, the characteristic peak near 3700 cm−1 gradually increases, while the characteristic peak near 530 cm−1 slightly decreases, suggesting that immersion treatment in alkaline media increases the content of Mg(OH)2 in the surface layer of the sample, yet decreases the content of MgO somewhat, which is in accord with the XRD analysis in Figure 5.
Figure 8 presents the FT-IR spectra of the inner cores of the MOC samples soaked in 10 wt.% NaOH solution for different periods of time. As can be seen from Figure 8, compared with the sample dipped in the alkaline media for 0 h, the characteristic peak near 3610 cm−1 disappears after an immersion time of 72 h, indicating that the P 5 in the inner core of the sample vanishes. In addition, the characteristic peak at 3700 cm−1 gradually increases with the extension of soaking time, but the characteristic peak near 530 cm−1 gradually weakens, suggesting that prolonging the immersion time in the alkaline solution increases the amount of Mg(OH)2 in the inner core of the sample, yet decreases MgO content slightly, which is consistent with the results of XRD analysis in the inner core shown in Figure 6.

4. Discussion

Magnesium oxychloride cement is an air-hardening, inorganic cementitious material which is prepared by mixing light-burned magnesia powders into MgCl2 solution to form a paste, which is then injected into the mold to harden in the air [26]. In general, the main hydration products of magnesium oxychloride cement are magnesium hydroxide (Mg(OH)2) and magnesium oxychloride, including 3Mg(OH)2·MgCl2·8H2O (abbreviated as 3·1·8 phase, P 3) and 5Mg(OH)2·MgCl2·8H2O (abbreviated as 5·1·8 phase, P 5), see Equations (2)–(4) [27]. Additionally, in this study, since the molar ratio of active MgO/MgCl2 is greater than 6, the MOC slurry samples are mainly composed of P 5, Mg(OH)2 and unreacted active MgO, as shown in the XRD patterns of samples (0 h) in Figure 5 and Figure 6.
MgO + H2O→Gel Mg(OH)2
3MgO + MgCl2 + 11 H2O→3Mg(OH)2·MgCl2·8H2O
5MgO + MgCl2 + 13 H2O→5Mg(OH)2·MgCl2·8H2O
When the MOC sample is used in water, it will be damaged mainly by the OH ions that form the weak ionization of H2O, which will make P 5 in the sample hydrolyze, and cause the active MgO to be hydrated (see Formulas (5) and (6)), and finally result in the deterioration of the sample, as shown in Figure 9. Figure 9 displays the macroscopic and microscopic morphology, compressive strength and phase composition of the MOC samples soaked in water for different periods of time. As can be observed from Figure 9, when the MOC sample is immersed in water for 3 days (72 h), there are macroscopic cracks on the surface of the sample. In the meantime, the amounts of P 5 and MgO decrease, yet Mg(OH)2 content increases in the surface layers of the samples. Furthermore, the microscopic morphology of the surface layers and inner cores of the samples are still in a gel state and needle-rod shape, and the compressive strength is 68.3 MPa. When the soaking time is further extended to 21 days, the macroscopic cracks become wide and long, and crisscross each other. The P 5 and MgO in the entire sample almost disappear, and the Mg(OH)2 content increases sharply. The microscopic morphology of the sample surface becomes flaky, and the inner core also exhibits an obvious sheet morphology. As a result, the compressive strength decreases to 9.5 MPa. These results indicate that when the MOC sample is dipped in water for 3 days, only the outer layer is slightly degraded, resulting in a decrease in the mechanical properties of the sample. However, when the MOC sample is soaked for 21 days, the water molecules completely immerse the inside of the sample, causing a battery of changes comprising the macro-morphology, the micro-morphology of the surface layer and inner cores, along with the main phase composition. These result in a significant decrease in the mechanical properties of the sample.
Mg(OH)2·MgCl2·8H2O + OH→5Mg(OH)2 + MgCl2(Loss)
active MgO + OH→Mg(OH)2
However, when MOC samples are applied in alkaline environments, they are eroded by OH ions which come from not only the weak ionization of H2O, but also the strong ionization of NaOH. This results in a higher content of OH ions in the solution and a faster hydrolysis reaction for P 5 (Equation (5)). While P 5 is the main strength phase, its decrease in content inevitably leads to the reduction in the mechanical properties of the sample. Therefore, when the MOC sample is soaked in 10 wt.% NaOH solution for 72 h, P 5 almost disappears from the entire sample. The surface and inner core of the sample exhibit a circular sheet morphology, and the surface layer also exhibits the phenomenon of micronization. The compressive strength of the sample is reduced to 13.5 MPa, which is only 20% of that in water. After steeping for 120 h (5 days), the compressive strength of the sample is reduced to 8.6 MPa, which is lower than when it has been immersed in water for 21 days (9.5 MPa).
In addition, MgO is an alkaline oxide, and the alkaline environment inhibits the hydration reaction of MgO. As a result, the MgO content in the MOC samples only decreases slightly with the extension of soaking time in 10 wt.% NaOH solution. The volume of Mg(OH)2 is larger than that of MgO, but it is much smaller than that of P 5; for this reason, the overall volume of MOC material does not expand significantly with the extension of soaking time in alkaline solution. Therefore, when the MOC sample is dipped in alkaline solution for 72 h, although its mechanical properties are greatly reduced, the sample’s surface is still intact, which differs from those samples soaked in water for 3 days (72 h). After an immersion time of 3 h in water, the sample possesses a relatively high compressive strength, but small cracks appear on the surface of the sample.
Obviously, the degradation mechanism of the MOC samples in an alkaline environment is unlike that demonstrated by water. The former is mainly a product of the alkaline environment which provides more OH ions, which can then react with P 5 in the sample, leading to a faster decomposition of the main strength phase P 5 in the sample, and further results in a substantial reduction in the strength of the sample and its gradual deterioration. The possible mechanism is shown in Figure 10.

5. Conclusions

  • The deterioration of the MOC sample in an alkaline environment is mainly due to the fact that the alkaline environment provides more OH ions, which can react with P 5 in the sample, giving rise to a faster decomposition of the main strength phase P 5 in the sample. This further results in a substantial reduction in the strength of the sample and its gradual deterioration.
  • Immersion time also exhibits a significant effect on the MOC sample. With the prolongation of the immersion time of the sample in an alkaline medium, a greater number of OH ions can enter the sample, which causes increasing P 5 to undergo a hydrolysis reaction, and results in more serious deterioration for the sample. The MOC slurry sample is mainly composed of P 5, Mg(OH)2 and MgO. Meanwhile, it possesses a gel-like and a needle-like micro-morphology, which are interleaved with each other and relatively compact. As a result, the MOC slurry sample has a high compressive strength of 83.7 MPa. After soaking for 6 h in an alkaline medium, the main phase composition of the surface layer of the MOC sample changes to MgO and Mg(OH)2, and the microscopic morphology is also dominated by a round-sheet, resulting in a sharp decrease in compressive strength (52.2%). When the immersion time is extended to 72 h, OH ions have already been immersed into the inner core of the sample, giving rise to the disappearance of P 5 from the entire sample. Meanwhile, both the surface layer and inner core of the sample exhibit a round-sheet morphology, and a powdering phenomenon also appears on the surface layer. Therefore, the compressive strength of the sample is reduced to 13.5 MPa, which is only 20% of its strength when dipped into water. After immersion for 120 h (3 days), the compressive strength of the sample is as low as 8.6 MPa, which is weaker than that when it has been steeped in water for 21 days (9.5 MPa), presenting a faster deterioration rate.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.A.; methodology, C.C.; software, C.C.; validation, L.A.; formal analysis, L.A.; investigation, C.C.; resources, C.C.; data curation, C.C.; writing—original draft preparation, C.C.; writing—review and editing, L.A. and C.C.; visualization, L.A. and C.C.; supervision, L.A. and C.C.; project administration, validation, editing, F.Y. and J.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors would like to acknowledge the Independent Innovation Fund of Qinghai Minzu University and Tianjin University (2022TQ03), the Top Talents program of “Kunlun Talents High-end Innovation and Entrepreneurship Talents” of Qinghai Province, and the Applied Basic Research in Qinghai Province (2021-ZJ-737). They collectively funded this project.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author and the first author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Qinghai Institute of Salt Lake, Chinese Academy of Sciences. 60 Years of Salt Lake Research of Chinese Academy of Science; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  2. Chang, C.G.; Dong, J.M.; Xiao, X.Y.; Zheng, W.X.; Wen, J.; Li, Y.; Huang, Q.; Man, Y. Long-term mechanical properties and micro mechanism of magnesium oxychloride cement concrete. Adv. Cem. Res. 2020, 32, 371–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, K.; Wang, Y.S.; Yao, N.; Zhang, A. Recent progress of magnesium oxychloride cement: Manufacture, curing, structure and performance. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 255, 119381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sorel, S.T. Sur un nouveau ciment magnesien. C. R. Hebd. Seances Acad. Sci. 1867, 65, 102–104. [Google Scholar]
  5. Paterson, J.H. Magnesium oxychloride cement. J. Soc. Chem. Ind. 1924, 43, 215–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sorre, C.A.; Armstrong, C.R. Reactions and equilibria in magnesium oxychloride cements. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1976, 59, 51–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Guo, Y.Y.; Zhang, Y.X.; Soe, K.; Pulham, M. Recent development in magnesium oxychloride cement. Struct. Concr. 2018, 19, 1290–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Xu, B.W.; Ma, H.Y.; Hu, C.L.; Yang, S.Q.; Li, Z.J. Influence of curing regimes on mechanical properties of magnesium oxychloride cement-based composites. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 102, 613–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jankovský, O.; Lojka, M.; Lauermannová, A.; Antončík, F.; Pavlíková, M.; Záleská, M.; Sedmidubský, D. Car-bon Dioxide Uptake by MOC-Based Materials. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 2254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Záleská, M.; Pavlíková, M.; Jankovský, O.; Lojka, M.; Pivák, A.; Pavlík, Z. Experimental Analysis of MOC Composite with a Waste-Expanded Polypropylene-Based Aggregate. Materials 2018, 11, 931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, Y.C.; Wei, L.Z.; Yu, J.T.; Yu, K.Q. Mechanical properties of high ductile magnesium oxychloride ce-ment-based composites after water soaking. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2019, 97, 248–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zuo, Y.F.; Xiao, J.H.; Wang, J.; Liu, W.J.; Li, X.G.; Wu, Y.Q. Preparation and characterization of fire retardant straw/magnesium cement composites with an organic-inorganic network structure. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 171, 404–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chang, C.G.; Dong, J.M.; Zheng, W.X.; Wen, J.; Yan, F.Y.; Xiao, X.Y.; An, L.Y. Long-term Properties of Aeolian Sand-magnesium Oxychloride Cement Composites and Its Engineering Application. J. Wuhan Univ. Technol. Sci. Ed. 2023, 38, 842–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Edan, H.H.; Hilal, N.; Sor, N.H.; Tawfik, T.A. Durability and Hardened Characteristics with SEM Analysis of Eco-Efficient Self-Compacting Concrete Partially Contained Waste Walnut Shell Particles as Fine Aggregate. Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Civ. Eng. 2023, 52, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Alani, N.Y.; Al-Jumaily, I.A.; Hilal, N. Performance of self-compacting concrete containing nano clay at ele-vated temperatures and MgSO4 attack. Eur. J. Environ. Civ. Eng. 2023, 27, 3001–3019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chang, C.G.; An, L.Y.; Zheng, W.X.; Wen, J.; Dong, J.M.; Yan, F.Y.; Xiao, X.Y. Research and Engineering Applica-tion of Salt Erosion Resistance of Magnesium Oxychloride Cement Concrete. Materials 2021, 14, 7880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Chang, C.G.; An, L.Y.; Lin, R.; Wen, J.; Dong, J.M.; Zheng, W.X.; Yan, F.Y.; Xiao, X.Y. Effect of Calcination Tem-perature on Mechanical Properties of Magnesium Oxychloride Cement. Materials 2022, 15, 607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chang, C.G.; Wen, J.; Dong, J.M.; Zheng, W.X.; Yan, F.Y.; Xiao, X.Y. Effect of carbonization on evolution process of microstructure of magnesium oxychloride cement. Inorg. Chem. Ind. 2022, 54, 61–65. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  19. Chang, C.G.; An, L.Y.; Dong, J.M.; Zheng, W.X.; Wen, J.; Yan, F.Y.; Xiao, X.Y. Study on Deterioration Process of Magnesium Oxychloride Cement under the Environment of Dry–Wet Cycles. Materials 2023, 16, 1817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, Y.; Yu, H.F. Rapid Assessment Method for Water Resistance of Magnesium Oxychloride Cement Basedon Measurement of High-temperature Erosion Thicknes. J. Chin. Ceram. Soc. 2014, 42, 1047–1054. [Google Scholar]
  21. GB/T 17671-1999; Method of Testing Cements-Determination of Strength. The State Bureau of Quality and Technical Supervision: Beijing, China, 1999.
  22. Li, Y.; Li, Z.J.; Pei, H.F.; Yu, H.F. The inflfluence of FeSO4 and KH2PO4 on the performance of magnesium ox-ychloride cement. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 102, 233–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Li, X.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, X.X.; Zheng, W.X.; Chang, C.G.; Ren, X.F.; Zeng, J.B.; Hai, C.X.; Shen, Y. Experimental in-vestigation of thermal and mechanical properties of magnesium oxychloride cement with form-stable phase change material. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 186, 670–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Záleská, M.; Pavlíková, M.; Pivák, A.; Maruiak, S.; Jankovsk, O.; Lauermannová, A.M.; Lojka, M.; Antončík, F.; Pavlík, Z. MOC Doped with Graphene Nanoplatelets: The Influence of the Mixture Preparation Technology on Its Properties. Materials 2021, 14, 1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Guo, Y.Y.; Zhang, Y.X.; Soe, K.; Hutchison, W.D.; Timmer, H.; Poblete, M.R. Effect of fly ash on mechanical prop-erties of magnesium oxychloride cement under water attack. Struct. Concr. 2020, 21, 1181–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xiao, X.Y.; Chang, C.G.; Zheng, W.X.; Fang, J.H.; Huang, S.J.; Wen, J.; Dong, J.M.; An, S.X. Study on Mechanical Property of Pavement Built with Magnesium Oxychloride Cement Concrete. J. Salt Lake Res. 2016, 24, 50–54. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhang, Z.Y.; Dai, C.L.; Zhang, Q.C.; Guo, B.Z.; Liu, W.L. Study on formation mechanism of phase 5 and phase 3. Sci. China Ser. B 1991, 1, 82–89. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Macroscopic photos of MOC samples soaked in alkaline solution for different periods of time.
Figure 1. Macroscopic photos of MOC samples soaked in alkaline solution for different periods of time.
Materials 16 05924 g001
Figure 2. Weight of MOC samples immersed in alkaline solution for different periods of time.
Figure 2. Weight of MOC samples immersed in alkaline solution for different periods of time.
Materials 16 05924 g002
Figure 3. Compressive strength of MOC samples dipped in alkaline solution for different times.
Figure 3. Compressive strength of MOC samples dipped in alkaline solution for different times.
Materials 16 05924 g003
Figure 4. Microscopic morphologies of the surface layer and inner core of MOC samples soaked in alkaline solution for different periods of time.
Figure 4. Microscopic morphologies of the surface layer and inner core of MOC samples soaked in alkaline solution for different periods of time.
Materials 16 05924 g004aMaterials 16 05924 g004b
Figure 5. XRD patterns for the surface layer of MOC samples after being dipped in the alkaline solution for different periods of time.
Figure 5. XRD patterns for the surface layer of MOC samples after being dipped in the alkaline solution for different periods of time.
Materials 16 05924 g005
Figure 6. XRD patterns for the inner core of MOC samples after being immersed in alkaline solution for different periods of time.
Figure 6. XRD patterns for the inner core of MOC samples after being immersed in alkaline solution for different periods of time.
Materials 16 05924 g006
Figure 7. FT-IR spectra of the surface layer of samples steeped in alkaline solution for different times.
Figure 7. FT-IR spectra of the surface layer of samples steeped in alkaline solution for different times.
Materials 16 05924 g007
Figure 8. FT-IR spectra of inner cores of samples dipped in alkaline solution for different periods of time.
Figure 8. FT-IR spectra of inner cores of samples dipped in alkaline solution for different periods of time.
Materials 16 05924 g008
Figure 9. Macroscopic morphology (a1,b1,c1), micro-morphologies of surface (a2,b2,c2) and inner core (a3,b3,c3), compressive strength (d) and XRD patterns of surface layer (e) and inner core (f) for MOC samples soaked in water for different durations: (a1a3) 0 days, (b1b3) 3 days, (c1c3) 21 days.
Figure 9. Macroscopic morphology (a1,b1,c1), micro-morphologies of surface (a2,b2,c2) and inner core (a3,b3,c3), compressive strength (d) and XRD patterns of surface layer (e) and inner core (f) for MOC samples soaked in water for different durations: (a1a3) 0 days, (b1b3) 3 days, (c1c3) 21 days.
Materials 16 05924 g009
Figure 10. Schematic diagram of deterioration mechanism of MOC sample in the alkaline environment.
Figure 10. Schematic diagram of deterioration mechanism of MOC sample in the alkaline environment.
Materials 16 05924 g010
Table 1. Chemical composition of bischofite.
Table 1. Chemical composition of bischofite.
CompositionMgCl2NaClMgSO4KClCaCl2Water-Insoluble MatterH2O
Content (wt.%)44.900.130.060.010.030.2754.6
Table 2. Chemical composition/(wt.%) of light burned magnesia.
Table 2. Chemical composition/(wt.%) of light burned magnesia.
CompositionMgOMgCO3CaCO3Free CaOAcid-Insoluble Matter
Content (wt.%)69.5219.801.340.388.41
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

An, L.; Chang, C.; Yan, F.; Peng, J. Study on the Deterioration Mechanism of Magnesium Oxychloride Cement under an Alkaline Environment. Materials 2023, 16, 5924. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16175924

AMA Style

An L, Chang C, Yan F, Peng J. Study on the Deterioration Mechanism of Magnesium Oxychloride Cement under an Alkaline Environment. Materials. 2023; 16(17):5924. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16175924

Chicago/Turabian Style

An, Lingyun, Chenggong Chang, Fengyun Yan, and Jianhong Peng. 2023. "Study on the Deterioration Mechanism of Magnesium Oxychloride Cement under an Alkaline Environment" Materials 16, no. 17: 5924. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16175924

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop