The Effect of Sterilization on the Accuracy and Fit of 3D-Printed Surgical Guides
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Karami, D.; Alborzinia, H.R.; Amid, R.; Kadkhodazadeh, M.; Yousefi, N.; Badakhshan, S. In-office guided implant placement for prosthetically driven implant surgery. Craniomaxillofac. Trauma Reconstr. 2017, 10, 246–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Younes, F.; Cosyn, J.; De Bruyckere, T.; Cleymaet, R.; Bouckaert, E.; Eghbali, A. A randomized controlled study on the accuracy of free-handed, pilot-drill guided and fully guided implant surgery in partially edentulous patients. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2018, 45, 721–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Angelis, F.; Papi, P.; Mencio, F.; Rosella, D.; Di Carlo, S.; Pompa, G. Implant survival and success rates in patients with risk factors: Results from a long-term retrospective study with a 10 to 18 years follow-up. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2017, 21, 433–437. [Google Scholar]
- Torabinejad, M.; Anderson, P.; Bader, J.; Brown, L.J.; Chen, L.H.; Goodacre, C.J.; Kattadiyil, M.T.; Kutsenko, D.; Lozada, J.; Patel, R.; et al. Outcomes of root canal treatment and restoration, implant-supported single crowns, fixed partial dentures, and extraction without replacement: A systematic review. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2007, 98, 285–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lekholm, U.; Gunne, J.; Henry, P.; Higuchi, K.; Linden, U.; Bergstrom, C.; van Steenberghe, D. Survival of the Branemark implant in partially edentulous jaws: A 10-year prospective multicenter study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 1999, 14, 639–645. [Google Scholar]
- Howe, M.S.; Keys, W.; Richards, D. Long-term (10-year) dental implant survival: A systematic review and sensitivity meta-analysis. J. Dent. 2019, 84, 9–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Albrektsson, T.; Zarb, G.; Worthington, P.; Eriksson, A.R. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: A review and proposed criteria of success. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 1986, 1, 11–25. [Google Scholar]
- Brandt, J.; Brenner, M.; Lauer, H.C.; Brandt, S. Accuracy of a template-guided implant surgery system with a CAD/CAM-based measurement method: An in vitro study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 2018, 33, 328–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Canullo, L.; Tallarico, M.; Radovanovic, S.; Delibasic, B.; Covani, U.; Rakic, M. Distinguishing predictive profiles for patient-based risk assessment and diagnostics of plaque induced, surgically and prosthetically triggered peri-implantitis. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2016, 27, 1243–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cassetta, M.; Giansanti, M.; Di Mambro, A.; Stefanelli, L.V. Accuracy of positioning of implants inserted using a mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guide in the edentulous maxilla and mandible. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 2014, 29, 1071–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Colombo, M.; Mangano, C.; Mijiritsky, E.; Krebs, M.; Hauschild, U.; Fortin, T. Clinical applications and effectiveness of guided implant surgery: A critical review based on randomized controlled trials. BMC Oral Health 2017, 17, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tahmaseb, A.; Wismeijer, D.; Coucke, W.; Derksen, W. Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: A systematic review. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 2014, 29, 25–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- D’Haese, J.; Van De Velde, T.; Komiyama, A.; Hultin, M.; De Bruyn, H. Accuracy and complications using computer-designed stereolithographic surgical guides for oral rehabilitation by means of dental implants: A review of the literature. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res. 2012, 14, 321–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Katsoulis, J.; Pazera, P.; Mericske-Stern, R. Prosthetically driven, computer-guided implant planning for the edentulous maxilla: A model study. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res. 2009, 11, 238–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ozan, O.; Turkyilmaz, I.; Ersoy, A.E.; McGlumphy, E.A.; Rosenstiel, S.F. Clinical accuracy of 3 different types of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in implant placement. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2009, 67, 394–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dawood, A.; Marti Marti, B.; Sauret-Jackson, V.; Darwood, A. 3D printing in dentistry. Br. Dent. J. 2015, 219, 521–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sennhenn-Kirchner, S.; Weustermann, S.; Mergeryan, H.; Jacobs, H.G.; Borg-von Zepelin, M.; Kirchner, B. Preoperative sterilization and disinfection of drill guide templates. Clin. Oral Investig. 2008, 12, 179–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, P.N.; Palenik, C.J.; Blanchard, S.B. Microbial contamination and the sterilization/disinfection of surgical guides used in the placement of endosteal implants. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 2011, 26, 274–281. [Google Scholar]
- Medical Devices Coordination Group. MDCG 2021-24: Guidance on Classification of Medical Devices; Medical Devices Coordination Group: Brussels, Belgium, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Goodman, H.S.; Carpenter, R.D.; Cox, M.R. Sterilization of dental instruments and devices—An update. Am. J. Infect. Control 1994, 22, 90–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, A.F.; Tsoi, J.K.H.; Matinlinna, J.P.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Z.F. Effects of different sterilization methods on surface characteristics and biofilm formation on zirconia in vitro. Dent. Mater. 2018, 34, 272–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Balan, G.; Grigore, C.A.; Budacu, C.C.; Calin, A.; Constantin, M.; Luca, C.M. Antisepsis, disinfection sterilization—Methods used in dentistry. Rev. Chim.-Buchar. 2017, 68, 186–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silinder, M.; Özer, A. Sterilization methods and the comparison of E-Beam sterilization with gamma radiation sterilization. FABAD J. Pharm. Sci. 2009, 34, 12. [Google Scholar]
- Grzelak, A.W.; Jeffkins, S.; Luo, L.; Stilwell, J.; Hathcock, J. Impact of X-ray irradiation as an equivalent alternative to gamma for sterilization of single-use bioprocessing polymers. Biotechnol. Prog. 2023, e3339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Türker, N.S.; Özer, A.Y.; Kutlu, B.; Nohutcu, R.; Sungur, A.; Bilgili, H.; Ekizoglu, M.; Özalp, M. The effect of gamma radiation sterilization on dental biomaterials. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2014, 11, 341–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Türker, S.; Özer, A.Y.; Kutlu, B.; Nohutcu, R.; Bilgili, H.; Ozturk, D.; Özalp, M.; Sungur, A. Gamma Irradiation Studies I. Dental Grafts. J. Med. Devices 2011, 5, 031011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Croonenborghs, B.; Smith, M.A.; Strain, P. X-ray versus gamma irradiation effects on polymers. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2007, 76, 1676–1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carvalho, F.G.; Goncalves, L.S.; Carlo, H.L.; Soares, C.J.; Correr-Sobrinho, L.; Puppin-Rontani, R.M. Influence of sterilization method on the bond strength of caries-affected dentin. Braz. Oral Res. 2009, 23, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shaheen, E.; Alhelwani, A.; Van De Casteele, E.; Politis, C.; Jacobs, R. Evaluation of dimensional changes of 3D printed models after sterilization: A pilot study. Open Dent. J. 2018, 12, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rutala, W.A.; Weber, D.J. Disinfection and sterilization: An overview. Am. J. Infect. Control 2013, 41 (Suppl. S5), S2–S5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rutala, W.A.; Weber, D.J. Reprocessing semicritical items: Current issues and new technologies. Am. J. Infect. Control 2016, 44 (Suppl. S5), e53–e62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Török, G.; Gombocz, P.; Bognár, E.; Nagy, P.; Dinya, E.; Kispélyi, B.; Hermann, P. Effects of disinfection and sterilization on the dimensional changes and mechanical properties of 3D printed surgical guides for implant therapy—Pilot study. BMC Oral Health 2020, 20, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- SHERAprint-sg; Shera Werkstoff-Technologie GmbH.: Lemförde, Germany, 2017.
- SG Surgical Guide; NextDent by 3D Systems GmbH.: Soesterberg, The Netherlands, 2021.
- V-Print SG; Voco: Cuxhaven, Germany, 2018.
- Optiprint Guide 385; Dentona AG: Dortmund, Germany, 2022.
- LuxaPrint Ortho; DMG Chemisch-Pharmazeutische Fabrik GmbH.: Hamburg, Germany, 2016.
- Marei, H.F.; Alshaia, A.; Alarifi, S.; Almasoud, N.; Abdelhady, A. Effect of steam heat sterilization on the accuracy of 3D printed surgical guides. Implant. Dent. 2019, 28, 372–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gielisch, M.; Heimes, D.; Thiem, D.G.E.; Boesing, C.; Krumpholtz, M.; Al-Nawas, B.; Kammerer, P.W. Steam-sterilized and degradable fused filament fabrication-printed polylactide/polyhydroxyalkanoate surgical guides for dental implants: Are they accurate enough for static navigation? Int. J. Bioprint. 2023, 9, 655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matheus, D.M.; Gomes, E.A.; Barcellos, D.C.; Rosetti, E.P.; Margonar, R. Linear dimensional accuracy of stereolithographic surgical guide after chemistry and physics sterilization. J. Stomatol. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2022, 123, 510–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pop, S.I.; Dudescu, M.; Mihali, S.G.; Pacurar, M.; Bratu, D.C. Effects of disinfection and steam sterilization on the mechanical properties of 3D SLA- and DLP-printed surgical guides for orthodontic implant placement. Polymers 2022, 14, 2107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Group | Product | Wavelength Compatibility | 3D Printer | Composition (in wt. %) |
---|---|---|---|---|
S | Sheraprint-SG | 385 nm/405 nm | SHERAprint 30 |
|
L | LuxaPrint Ortho | 385 nm/405 nm | DMG 3Delux |
|
V | V-Print SG | 385 nm | Solflex 350 |
|
O | Optiprint guide 385 | 385 nm | Asiga Max |
|
N | NextDent SG | 405 nm | NextDent 5100 |
|
C | Luxatemp-Flurescence | - | - |
|
Group | Mean ± SD (µm) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Before Sterilization (500 g Load) | After Sterilization (500 g Load) | After Sterilization (1800 g Load) | |
S | 144 ± 68 bc, A | 1100 ± 106 ab, B | 419 ± 120 ab, AB |
N | 125 ± 30 b, A | 814 ± 275 a, B | 308 ± 102 a, AB |
V | 149 ± 52 bc, A | 623 ± 229 a, B | 273 ± 74 a, AB |
O | 216 ± 48 cd, A | 823 ± 186 a, B | 290 ± 126 a, A |
L | 254 ± 5 d, A | 1910 ± 552 b, B | 509 ± 131 b, AB |
C | 58 ± 11 a, A | 1374 ± 610 ab, B | 348 ± 284 ab, A |
Group | Median Values (µm) | |
---|---|---|
Variations between P1 & P2 | Variations between P1 & P3 | |
S | 955 cd | 260 a |
N | 638 abc | 178 a |
V | 428 a | 138 a |
O | 581 ab | 94 a |
L | 1487 d | 250 a |
C | 1347 bcd | 245 a |
Group | Median Values of Measured Angles (°) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before Sterilization | After Sterilization | |||||
Angle 1 | Angle 2 | Angle 3 | Angle 1 | Angle 2 | Angle 3 | |
S | 79.7 | 49.8 | 50.7 | 80.1 | 50.1 | 50.0 |
N | 79.5 | 49.8 | 50.0 | 80.8 | 49.9 | 50.0 |
V | 79.9 | 50.0 | 50.5 | 80.2 | 49.5 | 50.3 |
O | 79.7 | 50.4 | 50.1 | 80.8 | 49.8 | 49.4 |
L | 80.4 | 50.1 | 49.8 | 79.8 | 49.5 | 50.2 |
C | 80.0 | 50.0 | 49.6 | 80.8 | 49.6 | 49.8 |
Group | Median Values of Angle Variation before and after (°) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Angle 1 | Angle 2 | Angle 3 | |
S | 0.9 | 1.6 | 0.7 |
N | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.2 |
V | 1.1 | 0.8 | 1.2 |
O | 1.2 | 1.0 | 0.4 |
L | 1.1 | 1.4 | 0.9 |
C | 1.4 | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Yazigi, C.; Chaar, M.S.; Busch, R.; Kern, M. The Effect of Sterilization on the Accuracy and Fit of 3D-Printed Surgical Guides. Materials 2023, 16, 5305. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16155305
Yazigi C, Chaar MS, Busch R, Kern M. The Effect of Sterilization on the Accuracy and Fit of 3D-Printed Surgical Guides. Materials. 2023; 16(15):5305. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16155305
Chicago/Turabian StyleYazigi, Christine, M. Sad Chaar, Reinhard Busch, and Matthias Kern. 2023. "The Effect of Sterilization on the Accuracy and Fit of 3D-Printed Surgical Guides" Materials 16, no. 15: 5305. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16155305
APA StyleYazigi, C., Chaar, M. S., Busch, R., & Kern, M. (2023). The Effect of Sterilization on the Accuracy and Fit of 3D-Printed Surgical Guides. Materials, 16(15), 5305. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16155305