Next Article in Journal
Application of DFT Simulation to the Investigation of Hydrogen Embrittlement Mechanism and Design of High Strength Low Alloy Steel
Next Article in Special Issue
Atomic Layer Deposition of HfO2 Films Using TDMAH and Water or Ammonia Water
Previous Article in Journal
Interface Optimization of Metal Quantum Dots/Polymer Nanocomposites and their Properties: Studies of Multi-Functional Organic/Inorganic Hybrid
Previous Article in Special Issue
Microstructure and Antimicrobial Properties of Zr-Cu-Ti Thin-Film Metallic Glass Deposited Using High-Power Impulse Magnetron Sputtering
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Electrical and Structural Properties of Semi-Polar-ZnO/a-Al2O3 and Polar-ZnO/c-Al2O3 Films: A Comparative Study

Institute of Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Al. Lotników 32/46, 02-668 Warsaw, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(1), 151; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16010151
Submission received: 31 October 2022 / Revised: 30 November 2022 / Accepted: 19 December 2022 / Published: 23 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Atomic Layer Deposition: From Fundamentals to Applications)

Abstract

In this work, the properties of ZnO films of 100 nm thickness, grown using atomic layer deposition (ALD) on a–(100) and c–(001) oriented Al2O3 substrate are reported. The films were grown in the same growth conditions and parameters at six different growth temperatures (Tg) ranging from 100 °C to 300 °C. All as-grown and annealed films were found to be polycrystalline, highly (001) oriented for the c–Al2O3 and highly (101) oriented for the a–Al2O3 substrate. The manifestation of semi-polar-(101) and polar (001)–oriented ZnO films on the same substrate provided the opportunity for a comparative study in terms of the influence of polarization on the electrical and structural properties of ZnO films. It was found that the concentration of hydrogen, carbon, and nitrogen impurities in polar (001)–oriented films was considerably higher than in semi-polar (101)–oriented ZnO films. The study showed that when transparent conductive oxide applications were considered, the ZnO layers could be deposited at a temperature of about 160 °C, because, at this growth temperature, the high electrical conductivity was accompanied by surface smoothness in the nanometer scale. On the contrary, semi-polar (101)–oriented films might offer a perspective for obtaining p-type ZnO films, because the concentration of carbon and hydrogen impurities is considerably lower than in polar films.
Keywords: ZnO; strain; microstrain; dislocation density; morphology; SIMS; electrical conductivity ZnO; strain; microstrain; dislocation density; morphology; SIMS; electrical conductivity

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mishra, S.; Paszkowicz, W.; Sulich, A.; Jakiela, R.; Ożga, M.; Guziewicz, E. Electrical and Structural Properties of Semi-Polar-ZnO/a-Al2O3 and Polar-ZnO/c-Al2O3 Films: A Comparative Study. Materials 2023, 16, 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16010151

AMA Style

Mishra S, Paszkowicz W, Sulich A, Jakiela R, Ożga M, Guziewicz E. Electrical and Structural Properties of Semi-Polar-ZnO/a-Al2O3 and Polar-ZnO/c-Al2O3 Films: A Comparative Study. Materials. 2023; 16(1):151. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16010151

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mishra, Sushma, Wojciech Paszkowicz, Adrian Sulich, Rafal Jakiela, Monika Ożga, and Elżbieta Guziewicz. 2023. "Electrical and Structural Properties of Semi-Polar-ZnO/a-Al2O3 and Polar-ZnO/c-Al2O3 Films: A Comparative Study" Materials 16, no. 1: 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16010151

APA Style

Mishra, S., Paszkowicz, W., Sulich, A., Jakiela, R., Ożga, M., & Guziewicz, E. (2023). Electrical and Structural Properties of Semi-Polar-ZnO/a-Al2O3 and Polar-ZnO/c-Al2O3 Films: A Comparative Study. Materials, 16(1), 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16010151

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop