Next Article in Journal
Thermomechanical Response of Polycarbonate/Aluminum Nitride Nanocomposites in Material Extrusion Additive Manufacturing
Next Article in Special Issue
Improving the p-Type CuCrO2 Thin Film’s Electrical and Optical Properties
Previous Article in Journal
Preparation of Collagen/Hydroxyapatite Composites Using the Alternate Immersion Method and Evaluation of the Cranial Bone-Forming Capability of Composites Complexed with Acidic Gelatin and b-FGF
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 15
Issue 24
10.3390/ma15248805
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

High Seebeck Coefficient from Screen-Printed Colloidal PbSe Nanocrystals Thin Film

by
Viviana Sousa
1,2,
Guillaume Savelli
3,
Oleg I. Lebedev
4,
Kirill Kovnir
5,6,
José H. Correia
7,8,
Eliana M. F. Vieira
7,8,
Pedro Alpuim
1,2 and
Yury V. Kolen’ko
2,*
1
Center of Physics of the Universities of Minho and Porto, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal
2
International Iberian Nanotechnology Laboratory, 4715-330 Braga, Portugal
3
University Grenoble Alpes, CEA-Liten, 17 av. Des Martyrs, 38000 Grenoble, France
4
Laboratoire CRISMAT, UMR 6508, CNRS-ENSICAEN, 14050 Caen, France
5
Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA
6
Ames National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Ames, IA 50011, USA
7
CMEMS-UMinho, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal
8
LABBELS–Associate Laboratory, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(24), 8805; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15248805
Submission received: 27 October 2022 / Revised: 2 December 2022 / Accepted: 4 December 2022 / Published: 9 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanostructural Thin Films: Microstructure and Optical Properties)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Thin-film thermoelectrics (TEs) with a thickness of a few microns present an attractive opportunity to power the internet of things (IoT). Here, we propose screen printing as an industry-relevant technology to fabricate TE thin films from colloidal PbSe quantum dots (QDs). Monodisperse 13 nm-sized PbSe QDs with spherical morphology were synthesized through a straightforward heating-up method. The cubic-phase PbSe QDs with homogeneous chemical composition allowed the formulation of a novel ink to fabricate 2 μm-thick thin films through robust screen printing followed by rapid annealing. A maximum Seebeck coefficient of 561 μV K−1 was obtained at 143 °C and the highest electrical conductivity of 123 S m−1 was reached at 197 °C. Power factor calculations resulted in a maximum value of 2.47 × 10−5 W m−1 K−2 at 143 °C. To the best of our knowledge, the observed Seebeck coefficient value is the highest reported for TE thin films fabricated by screen printing. Thus, this study highlights that increased Seebeck coefficients can be obtained by using QD building blocks owing to quantum confinement.

1. Introduction

Thin-film thermoelectric (TE) generators have recently attracted considerable attention in the information and communication technology applications, particularly for the long-term powering of internet-of-things (IoT) devices [1]. Classically, thin-film TEs are fabricated by means of effective but expensive vacuum-based techniques, such as chemical or physical vapor deposition techniques [2,3,4]. One key challenge in fabricating thin-film TEs is establishing alternative cheap deposition methods that yield high-quality thin film of TE material over large-area substrate [5,6,7]. For instance, the ability to use solution-based screen printing to deposit TE thin films would be advantageous owing to the cost-effectiveness and high throughput of this industrially relevant deposition technique [8].
Screen printing relies on a screen with a prepatterned mesh of specific size, where viscous ink is forced to pass through the mesh toward the substrate, with the help of a squeegee. This technique affords few-micrometer-sized TE thin films with compact material packing. Moreover, screen printing allows different substrates and patterns, which widens the range of TE generator geometries [9]. Notably, to improve ink adhesion to the substrate as well as its processability, the ink formulation demands an organic binder, which typically decreases the electrical conductivity of the resultant TE thin film. Accordingly, subsequent heat or chemical treatments of the screen-printed TE thin films are needed to achieve the required high electrical conductivity of the resultant functional film.
From the TE point of view, the intrinsically small dimensions of quantum dots (QDs) provide a natural reduction in thermal conductivity down to 0.9 W m−1 K−1 via phonon scattering at the QD interfaces [10]. Moreover, quantum confinement has been proposed to enable materials with outstanding Seebeck coefficients because of sharp features of carrier density-of-states near Fermi energy, in combination with selective carrier filtering at the QD interfaces [11,12,13]. Interestingly, QDs with TE properties could be used as building blocks for the fabrication of the TE thin films [14,15]. The QDs are typically synthesized by colloidal synthesis that employ long-chain organic capping ligands to passivate the QD surfaces and to provide a barrier to coalescence. Accordingly, the as-synthesized QDs are well-dispersible in non-polar organic solvents forming a stable colloidal dispersion, and hence, could be easily introduced into the formulation of the ink for screen printing.
One fundamental challenge in the TE thin film design involves the printed fabrication of the film from TE-relevant QDs. There are several hurdles in this direction during thin-film printing and processing, including the preservation of the QD particle sizes needed to exhibit the quantum confinement effect while avoiding any possible changes in the phase and chemical compositions of constituting QDs. Hence, screen-printed TE thin films from QDs are not common, and most of the reported works are dedicated to the screen printing of TE thin films from non-quantum materials, such as Bi2Te3 [1,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24], Sb2Te3 [25,26], Ag2Se [27,28,29] or PbTe [30], obtained by high-temperature melting and high-energy ball milling. In this work, we synthesized crystalline and compositionally homogeneous colloidal PbSe QDs using a heating-up method. Stable and viscous ink based on PbSe QDs was then formulated using ethyl cellulose as a binder and terpineol as a solvent. This novel ink enables the reliable fabrication of PbSe thin films by means of screen printing followed by a rapid heat treatment. Finally, the temperature-dependent TE properties of the resultant ca. 2 μm-thick films consisting of PbSe QDs were investigated, and the observed electrical conductivity and Seebeck coefficient value trends are highlighted.

2. Experimental Methods

2.1. Materials

Lead (II) acetate trihydrate (Pb(ac)2∙3H2O, ≥99.99%), selenium (Se, 100 mesh powder, ≥99.5%), trioctylphosphine (TOP, 97%), oleic acid (OA, 90%), 1-octadecene (ODE, 90%), ethyl cellulose (EC, 48% ethoxyl) and terpineol were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA. Analytical reagent grade hexane and toluene (99.8%) were purchased from Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA. Acetone (≥99.5%), isopropanol (≥99.8%), and ethanol (≥99.8%) were purchased from Honeywell, Charlotte, NC, USA.

2.2. Synthesis of PbSe QDs

To prepare the PbSe QDs, a previously reported colloidal synthesis protocol was adapted and modified [31]. First, 1 M Se solution in TOP (TOP:Se) was prepared by dissolving 7.89 g of Se powder in 100 mL of TOP while stirring overnight at 60 °C. In a typical experiment to prepare PbSe QDs, Pb(ac)2∙3H2O (2.8 g, 7.4 mmol), OA (6.6 g, 23.4 mmol), ODE (50 mL, 156.3 mmol) and 1 M TOP:Se solution (12 mL) were loaded under ambient conditions into a 250 mL three-neck round-bottom flask, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, thermocouple, condenser, and vacuum adapter. Next, the flask was attached to a Schlenk line, and the mixture was degassed under vacuum at 130 °C for 2 h while stirring to remove low boiling liquids, such as possible water and acetic acid admixtures. Then, the vacuum was switched to Ar, and the water reflux was initiated. Under continuous stirring, the flask was then rapidly heated to 190 °C and kept at this temperature for 10 min. Next, the resultant dark reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature (RT) using a water bath. Afterwards, the as-synthesized PbSe QDs were washed by the addition of 25 mL of ethanol and collected by centrifugation at 9000 rpm for 5 min. The resultant solid was washed with solvent mixture of hexane and isopropanol (1:3) and again collected by centrifugation. Finally, the size of the PbSe QDs was selected by dispersing of centrifuged solid in 15 mL of toluene followed by centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 10 min. The resultant supernatant with colloidal PbSe QDs was stored in closed vial at 4 °C. The concentration of PbSe QDs in toluene was estimated gravimetrically, and adjusted to be 30 mg/mL.

2.3. Fabrication of PbSe QD Thin Films

2.3.1. Ink Formulation

A 5% solution of ethyl cellulose in terpineol was prepared by dissolving the appropriate amount of EC in terpineol at 50 °C while stirring. To prepare an ink, 25% weight content of the PbSe QDs in solid form was added to the appropriate amount of 5% EC solution in terpineol. The ink was mixed first with a spatula and then probe sonication was used to improve QDs’ dispersion. The ink was sonicated on 5 min cycles with 5 s of sonication at 40% amplitude and 5 s pause. To achieve high dispersion of the PbSe QDs in the ink, 3 cycles were performed. Finally, the ink was let stir at 50 °C overnight.

2.3.2. Substrate Preparation

A 500 nm-thick silicon dioxide (SiO2) layer was grown by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition on Si (100) substrate. The resultant SiO2/Si substrate was then diced with 0.7 × 2 cm2 and 2 × 2 cm2 dimensions using an automatic dicing saw. The substrates were consecutively cleaned with acetone and isopropanol by ultrasonication for 5 min. Then, the substrates were dried by N2 flow, and finally, subjected to oxygen plasma cleaning for 10 min.

2.3.3. Screen Printing

To obtain the TE thin films from PbSe QDs on SiO2/Si substrates, six layers of ink were screen-printed using a homemade screen printer having 180 threads cm−1 mesh count while drying at 80 °C for 3 min on a hot plate in between each deposition.

2.3.4. Heat Treatment

The heat treatment was performed on a Thermal CVD MicroSys 400 System (Roth & Rau, Hohenstein-Ernstthal, Germany). The as-printed TE thin films were first annealed at 600 °C for 15 min under vacuum, and then under H2 gas flow of 100 sccm at 600 °C for 15 min to remove residual organics (ink components and QDs’ capping ligand).

2.4. Characterization

The phase composition of the PbSe QDs and the resultant thin films were analyzed using X-ray diffraction (XRD). The data were collected using an X’Pert PRO diffractometer (PANalytical, Malvern, UK) with Ni-filtered Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.541874 Å) and a PIXcel detector. The XRD patterns were matched to International Centre for Diffraction Data (ICDD) PDF-4 database using the HighScore software package (PANalytical, Malvern, UK).
To investigate the morphology and the chemical composition of the synthesized PbSe QDs, high-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF–STEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy in STEM mode (STEM−EDX) were carried out using a JEM-ARM200F electron microscope (Jeol, Tokyo, Japan), operated at 200 kV. QDs’ size distribution was estimated using ImageJ software package. The thickness and the surface morphology of the TE thin films were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) using Quanta 650 FEG ESEM (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA).
Electrical resistivity and charge mobility were measured by a simultaneous Hall Effect and Van der Paw method at RT. These measurements allowed to determine the surface and volume concentration of carriers, electron mobility and electrical conductivity. The results obtained are an average of five measurements with 5% error.
The Seebeck coefficient and electrical conductivity, in the temperature range from RT to 200 °C, were measured using a ZEM-3 system (ULVAC). The scheme of measurement is available in the Figure S1 of the Supplementary Material. The results are an average of three measurements at four different temperatures (30 °C, 90 °C, 140 °C, and 200 °C) with three different thermal gradients (10 °C, 20 °C, and 30 °C). The results obtained are an average value with 7% error.

3. Results

3.1. Monodisperse, Phase-Pure and Chemically Uniform Cubic-Phase PbSe QDs

PbSe QDs were prepared by a facile heating-up colloidal synthesis, relaying on the reaction between organometallic Pb precursor and Se solution in TOP under inert atmosphere. The as-synthesized PbSe QDs adopted a nearly spherical shape with monodisperse size distribution of 13 ± 1 nm, as shown in the representative low-magnification and high-resolution HAADF–STEM images (Figure 1a,c,d). The XRD pattern of the as-synthesized PbSe QDs (Figure 2) matched well the standard pattern for cubic-phase PbSe (ICDD no. 04-002-6293). The square-like atomic arrangement and well-resolved lattice spacing, observed in the high-resolution HAADF–STEM image (Figure 1d), further confirm the formation of crystalline cubic-phase PbSe QDs. The STEM–EDX element maps evidence the uniform distribution of Pb and Se elements within the QDs (Figure 1b). To evaluate the thermal behavior of the as-synthesized PbSe QDs, the powdered sample was subjected to a thermogravimetric analysis in Ar, which indicates that the PbSe phase itself did not show any significant weight loss before 650 °C (Figure S2). At the same time, the observed ca. 6.3% of weight loss before 450 °C (Figure S2) was associated with the evaporation of the residual toluene solvent as well as the degradation of the oleate capping ligand [32].

3.2. Phase-Pure and Relatively Compact PbSe QD Thin Films

Having high-quality PbSe QDs in hand, we further formulated a novel ink for screen printing. Since oleate-capped colloidal QDs could be well-dispersed in non-polar organic solvents, the ink was formulated based on terpineol solvent while using ethyl cellulose as a binder [33]. This newly developed ink affords reliable screen printing of the PbSe QD thin films onto SiO2/Si rigid substrates under ambient conditions. Rapid annealing of the as-printed films in vacuum (15 min) and H2 (15 min) at a temperature of 600 °C was then conducted to largely eliminate the organic matter from the printed thin films to improve their electrical conductivity.
Notably, the heat treatment did not affect the morphology or phase compositions of the original PbSe QD building blocks. Specifically, the XRD analysis (Figure 2) of the as-fabricated thin film demonstrated the same crystal structure of cubic-phase PbSe (ICDD no. 04-002-6293). Moreover, additional reflections could be observed in the XRD pattern of the film (Figure 2), which are associated with the SiO2/Si from the film substrate. Regardless of the conducted heat treatment, the presence of the residual carbon was still detected in the final PbSe QD thin films, as confirmed by Raman spectroscopy (Figure S3) [34].
The morphology of the films was observed by SEM, and the results indicate that the surface of the film exhibited a nanoparticulate appearance (Figure 3a). This suggests the presence of pristine PbSe QDs in the film, i.e., the PbSe QDs were not molten during rapid heat treatment at 600 °C. Figure 3b displays a cross-sectional SEM image of a PbSe QD thin film, wherein a PbSe QDs layer of around 2 μm was observed. Regardless of the relatively compact appearance of the PbSe QD thin film, it could be observed from Figure 3 that the film exhibited surface roughness, as well as a certain degree of porosity. The latter was most likely developed because of the liberation of the organic matter during rapid heat treatment.

3.3. PbSe QD Thin Films with Low Electrical Conductivity but High Seebeck Coefficient

To explore a potential application of the fabricated nanostructured PbSe QD thin films as thermoelectrics, we investigated their electronic properties as well as temperature-dependent electrical conductivity (σ) and Seebeck coefficient (S). Electrical properties, measured at RT by the Hall effect, revealed that PbSe QD thin films exhibited a bulk carrier concentration of 3.8 × 1018 cm−3, electron mobility of 7.9 × 10−1 cm2 V−1 s−1, and a quite low σ = 50 S m−1. The σ and S were then measured from RT to 200 °C in air (Figure 4a). Importantly, no oxidation of the PbSe phase was detected during such measurements (Figures S3 and S4), highlighting a good stability of the PbSe QD thin films within this temperature range at ambient conditions. The σ increased with the increase in the temperature, showing typical semiconductor behavior, and accordingly, the highest σ = 123 S m−1 was reached at 200 °C. The σ value is expected to continue increasing with temperature. A maximum value of S = 561 μV K−1 was observed at 143 °C. The measured positive S values indicate that PbSe QDs are p-type semiconductors with holes as the majority carriers. Power factor (PF) calculations resulted in a maximum value of PF = 2.47 × 10−5 W m−1 K−2 at 143 °C (Figure 4b).
Notably, the thermoelectric characterization of the thin films is a non-trivial task. In the current study, the σ and S was also evaluated by using a two-probe custom-made equipment, and compared with the values above in Table S1, obtained using the four-probe method.

4. Discussion

Phase-pure colloidal PbSe QDs with a monodisperse size of 13 nm and uniform chemical composition were obtained using the heat-up method. The QDs were formulated into novel ink and screen-printed on SiO2/Si substrate. After rapid heat treatment under an inert atmosphere, 2 μm-thick PbSe QD thin films were fabricated and their TE properties were investigated. To compare our results for the as-fabricated thin films, an extensive list of the reported screen-printed film thermoelectrics was analyzed and compared in Figure 5. Notably, screen-printable thin films reported so far typically employ TE particles obtained by high-temperature melting and high-energy ball-milling techniques for the fabrication of the films with a thickness of tens of microns [1,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,35,36,37,38,39]. In contrast, here, we show that it is possible to obtain 2 μm screen-printed PbSe QD thin films with interesting thermoelectric properties from QD building blocks obtained by the colloidal synthesis route.
The S at room temperature for our PbSe thin films reached 176 μV K−1 and a maximum of 561 μV K−1 at 143 °C, outperforming reported screen-printed TE thin films (Figure 5). For instance, Pb0.98Na0.02Te–2 mol% SrTe screen-printed thin film only reached a maximum of 400 μV K−1 at 350 °C [30]. The observed high S in our thin films is most likely related to the quantum confinement effect of key constituent PbSe particles. Notably, our PbSe nanocrystals had an average size of 13 nm (Figure 1), which was well below the quantum confinement upper limit of 46 nm set by the Bohr radius of an exciton (electron-hole pair) for PbSe QDs [12]. In turn, quantum confinement has been theoretically proposed to enable materials with an outstanding Seebeck coefficient [40,41], and several studies have experimentally verified this prediction in particular conditions [42,43,44]. Specifically, the Seebeck voltage arises from the disorder of the equilibrium distribution of charge carriers, described by the Fermi–Dirac distribution. It is a measure of the variation in σ(E) above and below the Fermi surface, i.e., by the logarithmic derivative of σ with E. From another point of view, S can also be understood as the average energy per carrier. Outstanding S can be reached by quantum confinement via (i) inducing sharp features in the carrier’s density of electronic states near Fermi energy (high dn(E)/dE), and (ii) introducing energy barriers to selectively scatter charge carriers according to their sign and energy (enhancing dμ(E)/dE).
In the literature, thin films produced from different lead chalcogenide QDs showed a higher Seebeck coefficient than the respective bulk material. For example, Yan and co-workers [45] produced thin films from PbTe nanowires with diameters below 30 nm reaching high S > 470 μV K−1, while Tai and co-workers [46] obtained S = 628 μV K−1 for their thin films, which are a huge enhancement in comparison with S = 265 μV K−1 of bulk PbTe. In another study, Zhou and co-workers [47] reported thin films from PbTe QDs of 8–14 nm, which reached S above 500 μV K−1. Yang and co-workers [48] fabricated thin films of PbSe(SnS2) QDs with S = –420 μV K−1 near 200 °C. A higher Seebeck coefficient value of 580 μV K−1 at room temperature was also reported by Nugraha and co-workers [49] for PbS QD thin films. Interestingly, Yang and co-workers [50] prepared PbSe QD thin films exhibiting a Seebeck coefficient > 600 μV K−1, which is considerably high when compared with the best S = 380 μV K−1 near 100 °C for bulk PbSe [51].
The observed decreasing trend in the S after reaching its maximum at 143 °C (Figure 4a) could be due to the excitation of the minority charge carriers over the bandgap (Eg), despite the fact that some technical issues with the measurement cannot be completely ruled out as a reason for a sharp six-fold decrease in the S value at 200 °C. Interestingly, regardless of the observed drop in thermopower at 200 °C, the electrical conductivity kept increasing with temperature (Figure 4a). Such behavior could be rationalized by the different compensation effect occurring due to the electrons from valence and conduction bands, that does not affect the electrical conductivity and the thermopower in a similar manner. Specifically, the thermopower is quite sensitive to the band asymmetry in relation to the Fermi level. As the temperature increases, electronic states in a thicker shell around the Fermi level will participate in the thermoelectric transport. Accordingly, the change in the Seebeck coefficient with temperature may not be uniform [52]. The bandgap of the produced material can be estimated following Goldsmid–Sharp formalism as Eg = 2e|Smax|Tmax = 0.50 eV, where e is the elementary charge, Smax is the maximum Seebeck value reached, and Tmax is the absolute temperature at which Smax occurs [53]. The bandgap calculated for the as-fabricated PbSe QD thin films (Eg = 0.50 eV) is larger than the one of bulk PbSe (Eg = 0.27 eV) [16]. The observed increased bandgap of the thin films might be due to the quantum confinement effect of the PbSe QDs with small particle size (Figure 1) [54].
The σ of PbSe QD thin films, near RT, measured by the Hall effect was quite low σ = 50 S m−1. Even at 200 °C, the maximum value obtained was σ = 123 S m−1, which is significantly lower when compared with σ = 1.84 × 104 S m−1 of bulk PbSe [51], or with other screen-printed thin-film TE materials presented in Figure 5. We then increased the thickness of our PbSe QD thin films from 2 μm to 3.5 μm by decreasing the screen printer’s mesh counts from 180 to 120 threads cm−1, and determined the σ at RT. The σ results listed in Table S2 confirm that a thicker PbSe QD layer could increase the σ of the film by nearly twice as much [20]. Nevertheless, the obtained value σ = 165 S m−1 was still far from the 104 S m−1 order when compared with the other screen-printed materials (Figure 5).
On the basis of the above results, one could deduce that although we were able to develop a baseline approach to PbSe QD thin films with an excellent Seebeck coefficient, the electrical conductivity of the thin films was prohibitively low with respect to real TE applications. The measured low value of the σ can be related to the small contact conductance between the spherical semiconducting QDs [55], since it is known that conventional semiconducting behavior will not be achieved if the spherical QDs are not fused into bulk by heat treatment [56]. Besides sintering, another interesting opportunity to increase the conductivity of the network of spherical semiconductor QDs is afforded by conformal deposition of additional conductive material onto connected spherical QDs, for example, using atomic layer deposition, thus increasing the electrical conductivity through the increase in contact area between spherical QDs [55,57]. One could also synthesize faceted QDs, for example, cubic-shaped, and then face-to-face assemble them into the QD thin film. Such a film is expected to exhibit enhanced σ as a consequence of the significantly increased contact area between cubic-shaped QDs as compared to spherical-shaped QDs. The explorations of the aforementioned approaches towards the increase in the σ of our PbSe QD thin films are the subject of our ongoing research efforts.

5. Conclusions

We demonstrate screen printing technology as an easy-to-scale-up approach to fabricate thermoelectric PbSe thin films with a thickness of a few micrometers and potential for near-RT application. This was achieved through (i) a straightforward colloidal synthesis of high-quality PbSe QD building blocks by means of the heat-up method, which allowed obtaining narrow-size and spherical-shape PbSe QDs, (ii) judicious formulation of a novel screen-printable PbSe QD ink obtained from well-dispersed QDs into a polymeric matrix, and (iii) a practical fabrication of the PbSe QD thin films by means of screen printing followed by rapid annealing, applied to eliminate ink organic precursors that could hinder QDs’ charge transport. We propose that owing to the quantum confinement effect from the PbSe QDs’ small size, the resultant thin films exhibit an outstanding Seebeck coefficient (561 μV K−1 at 143 °C), revealing the high potential of PbSe QDs for TE applications near RT. At the same time, the intrinsic shortcoming of the QD building blocks, namely, the small contact conductance between the spherically shaped QDs, led to very poor electrical conductivity (123 S m−1) of the final PbSe QD thin films. Studies on overcoming this shortcoming with the help of atomic layer deposition of the conductive layer are currently underway in our laboratories.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ma15248805/s1, Figure S1: Scheme of four-probe method (ZEM-3) (on the left) and two-probe custom-made equipment (on the right) that were used for electrical resistivity and Seebeck coefficient measurements; Figure S2: Thermogravimetric analysis of PbSe QDs; Figure S3: Raman spectra of PbSe QD thin film fabricated by screen printing followed by heat treatment and the same film after calcination at 200 °C for 30 min; Figure S4: Comparison of the XRD patterns of the as-synthesized PbSe QDs and PbSe QD thin-film material after calcination at 200 °C for 30 min; Table S1: Electrical conductivity and Seebeck coefficient results for PbSe QD thin films, measured at room temperature, by different methods; Table S2: Electrical conductivity and Seebeck coefficient results for PbSe QD thin films with different thicknesses, measured by two-probe custom-made equipment at room temperature. References [34,58,59,60,61,62] are cited in the Supplementary Materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.S. and Y.V.K.; methodology, V.S. and G.S.; investigation, V.S., G.S., O.I.L. and E.M.F.V.; supervision, E.M.F.V., P.A. and Y.V.K.; writing—original draft preparation, V.S.; writing—review and editing, G.S., O.I.L., K.K., J.H.C., E.M.F.V., P.A. and Y.V.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

V.S. acknowledges support by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) PhD Fellowship under Grant No. SFRH/BD/143750/2019. This research was supported in part by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program through the EnABLES project under Grant Agreement no. 730957. P.A. also acknowledges support from National Funds through the FCT in the framework of the Strategic Funding UIDB/04650/2020. E.M.F. Vieira thanks to CMEMS-UMinho Strategic Project UIDB/04436/2020 and UIDP/04436/2020. InfrastructuresMicro&NanoFabs@PT, operation code NORTE 01-0145-FEDER-022090, PORNorte, Portugal 2020.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

V.S. acknowledges support by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) PhD Fellowship under Grant No. SFRH/BD/143750/2019. This research was supported in part by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program through the EnABLES project under Grant Agreement no. 730957. P.A. also acknowledges support from National Funds through the FCT in the framework of the Strategic Funding UIDB/04650/2020. E.M.F. Vieira thanks to CMEMS-UMinho Strategic Project UIDB/04436/2020 and UIDP/04436/2020. InfrastructuresMicro&NanoFabs@PT, operation code NORTE 01-0145-FEDER-022090, PORNorte, Portugal 2020.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chen, C.W.; Liao, C.N. Enhanced thermoelectric properties of screen-printed Bi–Sb–Te films on flexible substrate by electrical sintering process. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2021, 259, 124006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zheng, Z.H.; Shi, X.L.; Ao, D.W.; Liu, W.D.; Chen, Y.X.; Li, F.; Chen, S.; Tian, X.Q.; Li, X.R.; Duan, J.Y.; et al. Rational band engineering and structural manipulations inducing high thermoelectric performance in n-type CoSb3 thin films. Nano Energy 2021, 81, 105683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ao, D.W.; Liu, W.D.; Chen, Y.X.; Wei, M.; Jabar, B.; Li, F.; Shi, X.L.; Zheng, Z.H.; Liang, G.X.; Zhang, X.H.; et al. Novel Thermal Diffusion Temperature Engineering Leading to High Thermoelectric Performance in Bi2Te3-Based Flexible Thin-Films. Adv. Sci. 2022, 9, 2103547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zheng, Z.H.; Zhang, D.L.; Jabar, B.; Chen, T.B.; Nisar, M.; Chen, Y.F.; Li, F.; Chen, S.; Liang, G.X.; Zhang, X.H.; et al. Realizing high thermoelectric performance in highly (0l0)-textured flexible Cu2Se thin film for wearable energy harvesting. Mater. Today Phys. 2022, 24, 100659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Burton, M.; Howells, G.; Atoyo, J.; Carnie, M. Printed Thermoelectrics. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2108183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hossain, M.K.; Hossain, S.; Ahmed, M.H.; Khan, M.I.; Haque, N.; Raihan, G.A. A Review on Optical Applications, Prospects, and Challenges of Rare-Earth Oxides. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2021, 3, 3715–3746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Khan, S.; Hossain, M.K. Chapter 2—Classification and properties of nanoparticles. In Nanoparticle-Based Polymer Composites; Woodhead Publishin: Sawston, UK, 2022; pp. 15–54. [Google Scholar]
  8. Jaldurgam, F.F.; Ahmad, Z.; Touati, F. Synthesis and performance of large-scale cost-effective environment-friendly nanostructured thermoelectric materials. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zeng, M.; Zavanelli, D.; Chen, J.; Saeidi-Javash, M.; Du, Y.; Leblanc, S.; Snyder, G.J.; Zhang, Y. Printing thermoelectric inks toward next-generation energy and thermal devices. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2022, 51, 485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Piotrowski, M.; Franco, M.; Sousa, V.; Rodrigues, J.; Deepak, F.L.; Kakefuda, Y.; Kawamoto, N.; Baba, T.; Owens-Baird, B.; Alpuim, P.; et al. Probing of Thermal Transport in 50 nm Thick PbTe Nanocrystal Films by Time-Domain Thermoreflectance. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 27127–27134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Mao, J.; Liu, Z.; Ren, Z. Size effect in thermoelectric materials. Quantum Mater. 2016, 1, 16028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yazdani, S.; Pettes, M.T. Nanoscale self-assembly of thermoelectric materials: A review of chemistry-based approaches. Nanotechnology 2018, 29, 432001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Dresselhaus, M.S.; Chen, G.; Tang, M.Y.; Yang, R.; Lee, H.; Wang, D.; Ren, Z.; Fleurial, J.-P.; Gogna, P. New directions for low-dimensional thermoelectric materials. Adv. Mater. 2007, 19, 1043–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ortega, S.; Ibáñez, M.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Kovalenko, M.V.; Cadavid, D.; Cabot, A. Bottom-up engineering of thermoelectric nanomaterials and devices from solution-processed nanoparticle building blocks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 3510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Yin, D.; Dun, C.; Gao, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Carroll, D.L.; Swihart, M.T. Controllable Colloidal Synthesis of Tin(II) Chalcogenide Nanocrystals and Their Solution-Processed Flexible Thermoelectric Thin Films. Small 2018, 14, 1801949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Slade, T.J.; Bailey, T.P.; Grovogui, J.A.; Hua, X.; Zhang, X.; Kuo, J.J.; Hadar, I.; Snyder, G.J.; Wolverton, C.; Dravid, V.P.; et al. High Thermoelectric Performance in PbSe–NaSbSe2 Alloys from Valence Band Convergence and Low Thermal Conductivity. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9, 1901377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Varghese, T.; Dun, C.; Kempf, N.; Saeidi-Javash, M.; Karthik, C.; Richardson, J.; Hollar, C.; Estrada, D.; Zhang, Y. Flexible Thermoelectric Devices of Ultrahigh Power Factor by Scalable Printing and Interface Engineering. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 1905796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Navone, C.; Soulier, M.; Plissonnier, M.; Seiler, A.L. Development of (Bi,Sb)2(Te,Se)3-based thermoelectric modules by a screen-printing process. J. Electron. Mater. 2010, 39, 1755–1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wu, H.; Liu, X.; Wei, P.; Zhou, H.Y.; Mu, X.; He, D.Q.; Zhu, W.T.; Nie, X.L.; Zhao, W.Y.; Zhang, Q.J. Fabrication and Characterization of Brush-Printed p-Type Bi0.5Sb1.5Te3 Thick Films for Thermoelectric Cooling Devices. J. Electron. Mater. 2017, 46, 2950–2957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shin, S.; Kumar, R.; Roh, J.W.; Ko, D.S.; Kim, H.S.; Kim, S.I.; Yin, L.; Schlossberg, S.M.; Cui, S.; You, J.M.; et al. High-Performance Screen-Printed Thermoelectric Films on Fabrics. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 7317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Feng, J.; Zhu, W.; Deng, Y.; Song, Q.; Zhang, Q. Enhanced Antioxidation and Thermoelectric Properties of the Flexible Screen-Printed Bi2Te3 Films through Interface Modification. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2019, 2, 2828–2836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Varghese, T.; Hollar, C.; Richardson, J.; Kempf, N.; Han, C.; Gamarachchi, P.; Estrada, D.; Mehta, R.J.; Zhang, Y. High-performance and flexible thermoelectric films by screen printing solution-processed nanoplate crystals. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 33135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Cao, Z.; Koukharenko, E.; Tudor, M.J.; Torah, R.N.; Beeby, S.P. Screen printed flexible Bi2Te3-Sb2Te3 based thermoelectric generator. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2013, 476, 012031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cao, Z.; Koukharenko, E.; Tudor, M.J.; Torah, R.N.; Beeby, S.P. Flexible screen printed thermoelectric generator with enhanced processes and materials. Sens. Actuator A Phys. 2016, 238, 196–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. We, J.H.; Kim, S.J.; Cho, B.J. Hybrid composite of screen-printed inorganic thermoelectric film and organic conducting polymer for flexible thermoelectric power generator. Energy 2014, 73, 506–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kim, S.J.; We, J.H.; Kim, J.S.; Kim, G.S.; Cho, B.J. Thermoelectric properties of p-type Sb2Te3 thick film processed by a screen-printing technique and a subsequent annealing process. J. Alloys Compd. 2014, 582, 177–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, D.; Zhao, Y.; Yan, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Shi, P.; Xue, C. Screen-Printed Flexible Thermoelectric Device Based on Hybrid Silver Selenide/PVP Composite Films. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Mallick, M.M.; Rösch, A.G.; Franke, L.; Ahmed, S.; Gall, A.; Geßwein, H.; Aghassi, J.; Lemmer, U. High-Performance Ag-Se-Based n-Type Printed Thermoelectric Materials for High Power Density Folded Generators. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 19655–19663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mallick, M.M.; Rösch, A.G.; Franke, L.; Gall, A.; Ahmad, S.; Geßwein, H.; Mazilkin, A.; Kübel, C.; Lemmer, U. New frontier in printed thermoelectrics: Formation of β-Ag2Se through thermally stimulated dissociative adsorption leads to high ZT. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 16366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Han, C.; Tan, G.; Varghese, T.; Kanatzidis, M.G.; Zhang, Y. High-Performance PbTe Thermoelectric Films by Scalable and Low-Cost Printing. ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 3, 818–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cadavid, D.; Ortega, S.; Illera, S.; Liu, Y.; Ibáñez, M.; Shavel, A.; Zhang, Y.; Li, M.; López, A.M.; Noriega, G.; et al. Influence of the Ligand Stripping on the Transport Properties of Nanoparticle-Based PbSe Nanomaterials. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2020, 3, 2120–2129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kolen’ko, Y.V.; Bañobre-López, M.; Rodríguez-Abreu, C.; Carbó-Argibay, E.; Sailsman, A.; Piñeiro-Redondo, Y.; Cerqueira, M.F.; Petrovykh, D.Y.; Kovnir, K.; Lebedev, O.I.; et al. Large-scale Synthesis of Colloidal Fe3O4 Nanoparticles Exhibiting High Heating Efficiency in Magnetic Hyperthermia. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 8691–8701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sousa, V.; Gonçalves, B.F.; Rosen, Y.S.; Virtuoso, J.; Anacleto, P.; Cerqueira, M.F.; Modin, E.; Alpuim, P.; Lebedev, O.I.; Magdassi, S.; et al. Over 6% Efficient Cu(In,Ga)Se2 Solar Cell Screen-Printed from Oxides on Fluorine-Doped Tin Oxide. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2020, 3, 3120–3126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Liu, Y.; Sun, B.; Tajcmanova, L.; Liu, C.; Wu, J. Effect of carbon residues structures on burnout characteristic by FTIR and Raman spectroscopy. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. Spectrochim. Acta A 2022, 272, 120947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ankireddy, K.; Menon, A.K.; Iezzi, B.; Yee, S.K.; Losego, M.D.; Jur, J.S. Electrical Conductivity, Thermal Behavior, and Seebeck Coefficient of Conductive Films for Printed Thermoelectric Energy Harvesting Systems. J. Electron. Mater. 2016, 45, 5561–5569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lee, H.B.; We, J.H.; Yang, H.J.; Kim, K.; Choi, K.C.; Cho, B.J. Thermoelectric properties of screen-printed ZnSb film. Thin Solid Films 2011, 519, 5441–5443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lee, H.B.; Yang, H.J.; We, J.H.; Kim, K.; Choi, K.C.; Cho, B.J. Thin-film thermoelectric module for power generator applications using a screen-printing method. J. Electron. Mater. 2011, 40, 615–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Weber, J.; Potje-Kamloth, K.; Haase, F.; Detemple, P.; Völklein, F.; Doll, T. Coin-size coiled-up polymer foil thermoelectric power generator for wearable electronics. Sens. Actuator A Phys. 2006, 132, 325–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, Y.; Ren, W.; Shi, P.; Liu, D.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, M.; Ye, Z.G.; Jing, W.; Tian, B.; Jiang, Z. A highly thermostable In2O3/ITO thin film thermocouple prepared via screen printing for high temperature measurements. Sensors 2018, 18, 958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Hicks, L.D.; Dresselhaus, M.S. Effect of quantum-well structures on the thermoelectric Bgure of merit. Phys. Rev. B 1993, 47, 727–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hicks, L.D.; Harman, T.C.; Dresselhaus, M.S. Use of quantum-well superlattices to obtain a high figure of merit from nonconventional thermoelectric materials. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1993, 63, 3230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ohta, H.; Kim, S.; Mune, Y.; Mizoguchi, T.; Nomura, K.; Ohta, S.; Nomura, T.; Nakanishi, Y.; Ikuhara, Y.; Hirano, M.; et al. Giant thermoelectric Seebeck coefficient of a two-dimensional electron gas in SrTiO3. Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 129–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Harman, T.C.; Taylor, P.J.; Walsh, M.P.; LaForge, B.E. Quantum dot superlattice thermoelectric materials and devices. Science 2002, 297, 2229–2232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Shimizu, S.; Bahramy, M.S.; Iizuka, T.; Ono, S.; Miwa, K.; Tokura, Y.; Iwasa, Y. Enhanced thermopower in ZnO two-dimensional electron gas. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 6438–6443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Yan, Q.; Chen, H.; Zhou, W.; Hng, H.H.; Yin, F.; Boey, C.; Ma, J. A Simple Approach for PbTe Nanowires with Enhanced Thermoelectric Properties. Chem. Mater. 2008, 20, 6298–6300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tai, G.; Zhou, B.; Guo, W. Structural characterization and thermoelectric transport properties of uniform single-crystalline lead telluride nanowires. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 11314–11318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhou, W.; Zhu, J.; Li, D.; Hng, H.H.; Boey, F.Y.C.; Jan, M.; Zhang, H.; Yan, Q. Binary-Phased nanoparticles for enhanced thermoelectric properties. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 3196–3200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yang, D.; Lu, C.; Yin, H.; Herman, I.P. Thermoelectric performance of PbSe quantum dot films. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 7290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Nugraha, M.I.; Kim, H.; Sun, B.; Haque, M.A.; De Arquer, F.P.G.; Villalva, D.R.; El-Labban, A.; Sargent, E.H.; Alshareef, H.N.; Baran, D. Low-Temperature-Processed Colloidal Quantum Dots as Building Blocks for Thermoelectrics. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9, 1803049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yang, H.; Wong, E.; Zhao, T.; Lee, J.D.; Xin, H.L.; Chi, M.; Fleury, B.; Tang, H.Y.; Gaulding, E.A.; Kagan, C.R.; et al. Charge Transport Modulation in PbSe Nanocrystal Solids by AuxAg1-x Nanoparticle Doping. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 9091–9100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Huang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, H.; Pennycook, S.J.; Zhao, L.-D. Enhancing Thermoelectric Performance of p-Type PbSe through Suppressing Electronic Thermal Transports. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2019, 2, 8236–8243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhang, B.; Guo, F.; Zhang, L.; Zhu, M.; Zheng, Y. Controllable sign reversal of Seebeck coefficient and the large tunability of: ZT value of plumbene: A first-principles study. J. Mater. Chem. C 2021, 9, 16645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Goldsmid, H.J.; Sharp, J.W. Estimation of the thermal band gap of a semiconductor from Seebeck measurements. J. Electron. Mater. 1999, 28, 869–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zevalkink, A.; Smiadak, D.M.; Blackburn, J.L.; Ferguson, A.J.; Chabinyc, M.L.; Delaire, O.; Wang, J.; Kovnir, K.; Martin, J.; Schelhas, L.T.; et al. A practical field guide to thermoelectrics: Fundamentals, synthesis, and characterization. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2018, 5, 021303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Staller, C.M.; Gibbs, S.L.; Gan, X.Y.; Bender, J.T.; Jarvis, K.; Ong, G.K.; Milliron, D.J. Contact Conductance Governs Metallicity in Conducting Metal Oxide Nanocrystal Films. Nano Lett. 2022, 22, 5009–5014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Greenberg, B.L.; Robinson, Z.L.; Ayino, Y.; Held, J.T.; Peterson, T.A.; Andre Mkhoyan, K.; Pribiag, V.S.; Aydil, E.S.; Kortshagen, U.R. Metal-insulator transition in a semiconductor nanocrystal network. Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, eaaw1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Lanigan, D.; Thimsen, E. Contact Radius and the Insulator-Metal Transition in Films Comprised of Touching Semiconductor Nanocrystals. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 6744–6752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Blackburn, J.L.; Chappell, H.; Luther, J.M.; Nozik, A.J.; Johnson, J.C. Correlation between Photooxidation and the Appearance of Raman Scattering Bands in Lead Chalcogenide Quantum Dots. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2011, 2, 599–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kuzivanov, M.O.; Zimin, S.P.; Fedorov, A.V.; Baranov, A.V. Raman Scattering in Lead Selenide Films at a Low Excitation Level. Opt. Spectrosc. 2015, 119, 938–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Vaqueiro, P. Chapter 1. Synthesis and Property Measurements of Thermoelectric Materials; Royal Society of Chemistry: London, UK, 2021; ISBN 9781788019590. [Google Scholar]
  61. Masoumi, S.; Noori, A.; Shokrani, M.; Hossein-Babaei, F. Apparatus for Seebeck Coefficient Measurements on High-Resistance Bulk and Thin-Film Samples. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2020, 69, 3070–3077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Alleno, E.; Bérardan, D.; Byl, C.; Candolfi, C.; Daou, R.; Decourt, R.; Guilmeau, E.; Hébert, S.; Hejtmanek, J.; Lenoir, B.; et al. Invited Article: A Round Robin Test of the Uncertainty on the Measurement of the Thermoelectric Dimensionless Figure of Merit of Co0.97Ni0.03Sb3. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2015, 86, 011301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 15 08805 g001 550
Figure 1. Representative low-magnification (a,c) and high-resolution (d) HAADF–STEM images of the as-synthesized PbSe QDs, together with the simultaneously collected STEM–EDX elemental maps of Pb, Se, and their mixture (b).
Figure 1. Representative low-magnification (a,c) and high-resolution (d) HAADF–STEM images of the as-synthesized PbSe QDs, together with the simultaneously collected STEM–EDX elemental maps of Pb, Se, and their mixture (b).
Materials 15 08805 g001
Materials 15 08805 g002 550
Figure 2. XRD patterns of the as-synthesized PbSe QDs (bottom) and the resultant PbSe QD thin film (top).
Figure 2. XRD patterns of the as-synthesized PbSe QDs (bottom) and the resultant PbSe QD thin film (top).
Materials 15 08805 g002
Materials 15 08805 g003 550
Figure 3. Representative surface (a) and cross-sectional (b) SEM images of the PbSe QD thin film, fabricated through screen printing followed by rapid heat treatment.
Figure 3. Representative surface (a) and cross-sectional (b) SEM images of the PbSe QD thin film, fabricated through screen printing followed by rapid heat treatment.
Materials 15 08805 g003
Materials 15 08805 g004 550
Figure 4. Temperature-dependent electrical conductivity and Seebeck coefficient (a), as well as Power Factor (b) of the p-type PbSe QD thin films.
Figure 4. Temperature-dependent electrical conductivity and Seebeck coefficient (a), as well as Power Factor (b) of the p-type PbSe QD thin films.
Materials 15 08805 g004
Materials 15 08805 g005 550
Figure 5. Comparison of the Seebeck coefficient and electrical conductivity for different reported thermoelectric thin films fabricated using the screen printing technique [1,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,35,36,37,38,39].
Figure 5. Comparison of the Seebeck coefficient and electrical conductivity for different reported thermoelectric thin films fabricated using the screen printing technique [1,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,35,36,37,38,39].
Materials 15 08805 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sousa, V.; Savelli, G.; Lebedev, O.I.; Kovnir, K.; Correia, J.H.; Vieira, E.M.F.; Alpuim, P.; Kolen’ko, Y.V. High Seebeck Coefficient from Screen-Printed Colloidal PbSe Nanocrystals Thin Film. Materials 2022, 15, 8805. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15248805

AMA Style

Sousa V, Savelli G, Lebedev OI, Kovnir K, Correia JH, Vieira EMF, Alpuim P, Kolen’ko YV. High Seebeck Coefficient from Screen-Printed Colloidal PbSe Nanocrystals Thin Film. Materials. 2022; 15(24):8805. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15248805

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sousa, Viviana, Guillaume Savelli, Oleg I. Lebedev, Kirill Kovnir, José H. Correia, Eliana M. F. Vieira, Pedro Alpuim, and Yury V. Kolen’ko. 2022. "High Seebeck Coefficient from Screen-Printed Colloidal PbSe Nanocrystals Thin Film" Materials 15, no. 24: 8805. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15248805

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop