Next Article in Journal
Microstructure Sensitivity on Environmental Embrittlement of a High Nb Containing TiAl Alloy under Different Atmospheres
Next Article in Special Issue
The Influence of Oxidation on the Magnetic, Electrical, and Mechanical Properties of Co40Fe40Yb20 Films
Previous Article in Journal
Different Fiber Reinforcement Effects on Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Long-Term Deflection in Three-Point Bending and Microstructure
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Annealing and Thickness of Co60Fe20Yb20 Nanofilms on Their Structure, Magnetic Properties, Electrical Efficiency, and Nanomechanical Characteristics
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Annealing and Thickness of Co40Fe40Yb20 Thin Films on Various Physical Properties on a Glass Substrate

1
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung 84001, Taiwan
2
Bachelor Program in Interdisciplinary Studies, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, 123 University Road, Section 3, Douliou 64002, Taiwan
3
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, 415 Chien Kung Road, Kaohsiung 80778, Taiwan
4
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 40227, Taiwan
5
Graduate School of Materials Science, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, 123 University Road, Section 3, Douliou 64002, Taiwan
6
Department of Electronic Engineering, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, 123 University Road, Section 3, Douliou 64002, Taiwan
7
Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica, Nankang, Taipei 11529, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(23), 8509; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15238509
Submission received: 19 October 2022 / Revised: 18 November 2022 / Accepted: 26 November 2022 / Published: 29 November 2022

Abstract

:
The aim of this work is to investigate the effect of annealing and thickness on various physical properties in Co40Fe40Yb20 thin films. X-ray diffraction (XRD) was used to determine the amorphous structure of Co40Fe40Yb20 films. The maximum surface energy of 40 nm thin films at 300 °C is 34.54 mJ/mm2. The transmittance and resistivity decreased significantly as annealing temperatures and thickness increased. At all conditions, the 10 nm film had the highest hardness. The average hardness decreased as thickness increased, as predicted by the Hall–Petch effect. The highest low-frequency alternative-current magnetic susceptibility (χac) value was discovered when the film was annealed at 200 °C with 50 nm, and the optimal resonance frequency (ƒres) was in the low frequency range, indicating that the film has good applicability in the low frequency range. At annealed 200 °C and 50 nm, the maximum saturation magnetization (Ms) was discovered. Thermal disturbance caused the Ms to decrease when the temperature was raised to 300 °C. The optimum process conditions determined in this study are 200 °C and 50 nm, with the highest Ms, χac, strong adhesion, and low resistivity, which are suitable for magnetic applications, based on magnetic properties and surface energy.

1. Introduction

CoFe alloys are commonly used in a variety of magnetic devices, such as sensors, actuators, read heads, and magnetic random-access memory (MRAM) [1,2,3]. Most non-crystal glass substrates used for perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA) have a certain degree of rigidity and flatness [4,5]. The soft magnetic underlayer is very helpful for the writing of perpendicular magnetic recording. The role is to help the single pole writer with magnetic field line transmission. It can be written into the material with higher magnetic anisotropy constant (Ku) values. Therefore, it has the potential to improve the thermal stability of the recording medium. The magnetic properties of a CoFe (Cobalt Iron) alloy can be tuned depending on the application by varying the Co to Fe ratio [6,7]. However, the CoFe alloy does not have low coercivity (Hc), and the annealing temperature accelerates the degeneration of magnetic anisotropy faults, making it difficult to meet the magnetic equipment used at high temperatures. One solution for increasing the thermal stability of the CoFe alloy is to add a third element. The common characteristics of rare earth magnetic materials are high saturation magnetization (Ms), Curie temperature (Tc), and magnetic anisotropy field (Hk), particularly. In general, the addition of rare-earth (RE) elements to CoFe alloy can improve its hardness, corrosion resistance, and durability, as well as improve heat resistance and other benefits [8,9,10]. Due to their widespread use in numerous applications, including spintronic, fiber amplifier, photoluminescence, and laser, RE element-doped nanomaterials have become the center of interest. As a result, the primary research goal of this paper is to identify other elements that can be added to CoFe alloys to effectively improve their stability. Ytterbium (Yb) is an important RE element because of its unique optical and magnetic properties, as well as its incompletely filled 4f electronic states [11,12,13]. YAG (Yttrium Aluminum Garnet) nanophosphor powder doped with Yb3+ is an excellent laser material [14]. Moreover, a free or pinned layer of Co40Fe40B20 thin film is frequently utilized in magnetic tunneling junction (MTJ) structures because it has a high tunneling magnetoresistance (TMR) ratio. To test several specific features, this study predominantly formed CoFeYb films using the same Yb and B (Boron) ratio. The innovative aspects of this research include examining annealed CoFeYb thin films to determine if they would change in high temperature environments, as well as investigating the structure and magnetic properties of CoFeYb thin films as a function of thickness. The performance is more sensitive to high operating temperatures and room temperature (RT). However, a few studies on the magnetic, electrical, optical, and nanomechanical properties of CoFeYb films under as-deposited and annealed conditions have been conducted. For the convenience of readers, the abbreviations and full names of proper nouns in this article are listed in Table 1. This study also looks at the thicknesses of CoFeYb in various as-deposited and annealed conditions. Previous research has compared the magnetic and adhesive properties of CoFeYb materials to those of CoFeV and CoFeW in Table 2 [15,16,17].

2. Materials and Methods

CoFeYb with a thickness of 10–50 nm was sputtered onto a glass substrate at room temperature (RT) using a magnetron sputtering direct current (DC) method with a power of 50 W and the four conditions listed below: (a) as-deposited films were kept at RT, (b) annealed at 100 °C for 1 h, (c) annealed at 200 °C for 1 h, and (d) annealed at 300 °C for 1 h. A schematic of the experimental sputtering system is shown in Figure 1. Ar (Argon) operating pressure was 1.54 × 10−3 Torr and the chamber base pressure was 1.07 × 10−7 Torr. CoFeYb alloy with a target composition was 40% Co, 40% Fe, and 20% Yb. With a particular Ar gas, the pressure in the ex-situ annealed condition was 2.5 × 10−3 Torr. Grazing incidence X-ray diffraction (GIXRD) patterns acquired with CuKα1 (PAN analytical X’pert PRO MRD, Malvern Panalytical Ltd., Cambridge, UK) and a low angle diffraction incidence of around two degrees were used to analyze the crystal structure of CoFeYb films. A contact angle (θ) measuring tool (CAM-110, Creating Nano Technologies, Tainan City, Taiwan) was utilized to measure the contact angle using deionized (DI) water and glycerol, which was then used to determine the surface energy [18,19,20]. A spectral intelligent analyzer (Collimage, Taipei, Taiwan) was used to measure the transmittance of CoFeYb. The visible light wavelength ranged from 500 to 800 nm. The electrical properties are detected by four-point probe measurement (Sadhudesign, Hsinchu City, Taiwan). Using the MTS (mechanical testing and simulation) Nano Indenter XP (MTS, Minneapolis, MN, USA) with a Berkovich tip and the continuous stiffness measurement (CSM) method, the hardness of Co40Fe40Yb20 films was examined. Once the load was reduced to 10% of the maximum load, we removed the indent from the surface at the same rate. Measurement should be repeated ten times for each sample with the probe. The indentation load is multiplied by 40 stages, with each step’s indentation depth being recorded. In order to produce more precise data, six indentations from each sample were evaluated, and the standard deviations were averaged. The χac analyzer (XacQuan, MagQu Co., Ltd., New Tapei City, Taiwan) and alternating gradient magnetometer (AGM, PMC, Westerville, OH, USA) were used to investigate the in-plane low-frequency alternate-current magnetic susceptibility (χac) and hysteresis loop of Co40Fe40Yb20 thin films.

3. Results

3.1. Structure

The XRD patterns for each of the four situations are shown in Figure 2. Figure 2a–d show that the film produces no distinctive diffracted peak, indicating that it is amorphous and that the addition of Yb to CoFe alloys causes the refinement of grain size [21]. The figure also shows that the Co40Fe40Yb20 film sputtered on the glass substrate is in an amorphous condition and that the thermal driving force is insufficient to sustain grain growth [21,22,23,24]. The Co40Fe40Yb20 sputtering film is randomly arranged when the substrate is randomly arranged due to the amorphous nature of the glass substrate. When the film is deposited in thicknesses ranging from 10 nm to 50 nm, the film structure is not completely ordered, resulting in the substrate effect.

3.2. Analysis of Surface Energy and Adhesion

The contact angles measured under four conditions using DI water and glycerol are shown in Table 3. The Co40Fe40Yb20 films had contact angles that were reportedly less than 90°, and the drops were almost spherical, which led to good hydrophilicity and wettability. The contact angle can therefore be inferred to be decreasing as the higher annealed temperature increases. It is reasonable to infer that the large grains of annealed material exhibit significant gaps between adjacent grains when the grains are arranged in the material. As the gaps widen and the support between the crystal grains diminishes, the crystal grain size rises and a trend toward reduced contact angles develops. Water easily flows into gaps when it falls on a surface, producing small contact angles, strong adhesion, and high surface energies [25]. Surface energy and adhesion are critical because Co40Fe40Yb20 film can be used as an underlayer or buffer layer. When the surface energy is high, liquid absorption is significant and the contact angle decreases. The surface energy is calculated using Young’s equation and the contact angle [18,19,20].
The surface energy is depicted in Figure 3 under all conditions. The surface energy varied between 28.63 and 34.54 mJ/mm2. The adhesion was strongest when the films had a higher surface energy. According to the calculations, the highest surface energy of 40 nm at 300 °C was 34.54 mJ/mm2.

3.3. Examination of Optical Properties

Figure 4 depicts the optical transmittance (%) spectra at visible wavelengths ranging from 500 nm to 800 nm. As shown in Figure 4a, as the thickness increased from 10 to 50 nm, the transmittance at RT decreased from 76.21% to 26.50%. Figure 4b shows that at a temperature of 100 °C, the transmittance decreased from 77.98% to 25.83%. Figure 4c shows that the transmittance decreased from 84.75% to 27.45% at the 200 °C annealing temperature, while Figure 4d shows that the transmittance decreased from 80.12% to 25.50% at the 300 °C annealing temperature. Only a minor change in transmittance was observed as the annealing temperature increased, and the trend was not immediately apparent. These findings imply that thinner Co40Fe40Yb20 films have a higher transmission rate because thicker films obstruct the incident signal [26,27,28]. The increased grain size with thickness and annealing treatment can be attributed to the improved crystallinity. Crystallinity increases due to the increased ability of add atoms to move to stable sites in the lattice. Thicker films are more homogeneous, resulting in fewer defects and localized states and an increase in the optical band gap [29].

3.4. Electrical Analysis

The resistivity and sheet resistance are depicted in Figure 5a,b under all conditions. The resistivity at 10 nm was not tested because there was insufficient thickness to be examined. The sheet resistance and resistivity of Co40Fe40Yb20 films varied with thickness and annealing treatment. The conduction mechanism of CoFeYb film is thought to be related to the carrier present in the structure. The electrical properties of CoFeYb films are strongly influenced by their as-deposited and annealed environments. However, higher annealed temperatures and thicker thicknesses appear to result in better crystalline structure and lower carrier hindrance in the films, which is the dominant factor of conductivity and leads to lower resistivity. The results show that the sheet resistance and resistivity of CoFeYb films prepared using annealing treatments are lower than those obtained using unheated substrates [30]. In total, the resistivity varied between 0.02 and 113.47 Ω-cm, and the sheet resistance varied between 4.5 × 103 and 5.7 × 107 Ω. The resistivity and sheet resistance of as-deposited and thinner films are higher than those of annealed and thicker films because they have lower electron mobility through the film and more defects and impurities, which increase the presence of electron scattering [31,32].

3.5. Hardness Analysis

Figure 6 demonstrates that the films’ hardness ranged from 7.24 GPa to 7.70 GPa under all circumstances. The hardness shows a decreasing trend as thickness increases. As-deposited films have a harder surface than annealed ones. As the penetration depth increased, the hardness of the thin film with varying glass substrate thicknesses decreased; this could be a characteristic of the substrate when the penetration depth is sufficient [33,34]. The Pharr–Oliver method is commonly used to calculate hardness from loading and unloading curves, which demonstrate the combined hardness of the glass substrate and CoFeYb films [35]. Because of the thinness of the CoFeYb film, it is reasonable to assume that the substrate effect in nano-indentation measurement exists [36,37]. Furthermore, as the thickness increases, the hardness decreases, which is consistent with the Hall–Petch effect [38]. Because the harness value of annealing 300 °C thin film at a thickness of 30 nm is exhibiting abnormal behavior, it can be reasonably concluded that higher annealing treatment induces oxidation or impurity, resulting in dislocations that are difficult to move and increasing hardness [39].

3.6. Magnetic Analysis

Figure 7a–d depict the low-frequency alternative-current magnetic susceptibility (χac) under four conditions. The χac decreased as the frequency increased in the 50–25,000 Hz range. As the film thickness increased from 10 to 50 nm, the corresponding χac value increased. At high frequency, the χac values of all films dropped dramatically. The maximum χac value for as-deposited 50 nm was 0.214. The maximum χac value for the 50 nm film was 0.176 after post-annealing at 100 °C, 0.358 after post-annealing at 200 °C, and 0.280 after post-annealing at 300 °C.
Figure 8 depicts the corresponding maximum χac values under all conditions. Because of the thickness effect, the maximum χac increased [40]. The annealing treatment produced the highest ac value of 0.358 at post-annealing 200 °C of the 50 nm film. Furthermore, due to thermal disturbance, the ac of post-annealing at 300 °C was lower than that at 200 °C.
The maximum χac for the optimal resonance frequency (fres) under four different conditions is shown in Table 4. At the optimal resonance frequency, the maximum χac exhibited the strongest spin sensitivity [41]. The fres value was less than 100 Hz at each thickness. The optimal resonance frequency was determined to be less than 500 Hz, making it appropriate for use in low-frequency sensors, transformers, and magnetic components.
The maximum χac value of the film is 50 nm. As a result, the magnetic properties of a 50 nm film were investigated at various annealing temperatures. Figure 9a depicts the magnetic hysteresis loops of the 50 nm under four different conditions. With an external magnetic field (Hext) of 10 kOe in the plane, the saturated magnetic spin state was visible. The expanded figure shows low Hc, implying that the Co40Fe40Yb20 films have soft magnetization. The saturation magnetization (Ms) of the Co40Fe40Yb20 thin films is shown in Figure 9b under all conditions. The maximum value of Ms is comparable to the χac result after post-annealing at 200 °C. Due to thermal disturbance, the Ms and χac values of 50 nm films annealed at 300 °C were less than those at 200 °C. Ms decreased significantly after post-annealing at 100 °C, owing primarily to the temperature compensation effect [42].
In short, the underneath glass substrate has an effect on significant properties, which is worth discussing. The glass substrate itself is an amorphous structure, so even after heat treatment, the film is still an amorphous structure, resulting in no magnetocrystalline anisotropy and reduced magnetic property, surface energy decreases, transmittance increases, and grain refinement leads to an increase in hardness [43].

3.7. Challenges and Prospects

A new soft magnetic material is Co40Fe40Yb20 thin film. In the future, the question and challenge will be whether it can be used as a free or pinned layer in the MTJ structure. The key question is whether spin polarization can generate high TMR when applied to magnetic fields, as well as have high PMA and improve magnetic recording density.

4. Conclusions

Because of the addition of Yb and insufficient thermal driving force for grain growth, XRD results reveal that the structure is amorphous. A decrease in transmittance indicated that the thickness and interfacial effects were responsible for the transfer of photon signals through the material. The resistivity and sheet resistance significantly decreased as the thickness increased. As-deposited films have a harder surface than annealed ones. Hardness decreased as thickness increased, which is consistent with the Hall–Petch effect. At a post-annealing temperature of 200 °C, which is consistent with χac, the greatest Ms for a 50 nm was observed. The Ms and χac values of the 50 nm film when annealed at 300 °C were lower than those at 200 °C, due to thermal disturbance. As a result, it was discovered that a 50 nm thick film and a 200 °C annealing temperature produced the highest ac and Ms and the lowest resistivity. The films were suitable for use in magnetic storage devices at this temperature because the Ms and χac values were at their highest.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.-J.L., Y.-H.C. (Yung-Huang Chang), C.-C.C. and Y.-T.C.; methodology, Y.-T.C. and C.-L.F., Y.-H.C. (Ying-Hsuan Chen), H.-W.L., S.-H.L. and K.-W.L.; validation, formal analysis, Y.-T.C. and P.-W.C.; investigation, Y.-T.C. and W.-J.L.; resources, C.-L.F., Y.-H.C. (Ying-Hsuan Chen), H.-W.L., T.-H.W., S.-H.L. and K.-W.L.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.-T.C.; writing—review and editing, Y.-T.C. and W.-J.L.; supervision, Y.-T.C. and Y.-H.C. (Yung-Huang Chang); project administration, Y.-T.C., C.-C.C. and T.-H.W.; funding acquisition, W.-J.L.,Y.-H.C. (Yung-Huang Chang) and C.-C.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Science Council, under Grant No. MOST 110-2221-E-992-054-MY3, MOST108-2221-E-224-015-MY3, MOST105-2112-M-224-001, and National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, under Grant No. 112T01.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Science Council, under Grant No. MOST 110-2221-E-992-054-MY3, MOST108-2221-E-224-015-MY3, MOST105-2112-M-224-001, and National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, under Grant No. 112T01.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interests regarding the publication of this paper. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Li, Y.; Zeng, F.; Zhang, S.S.-L.; Shin, H.; Saglam, H.; Karakas, V.; Ozatay, O.; Pearson, J.E.; Heinonen, O.G.; Wu, Y.; et al. Giant Anisotropy of Gilbert Damping in Epitaxial CoFe Films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019, 122, 117203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Zhang, Y.; Ivey, D.G. Electrodeposition of nanocrystalline CoFe soft magnetic thin films from citrate-stabilized baths. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2018, 204, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Conte, R.L.; Gorchon, J.; Mougin, A.; Lambert, C.H.A.; Ghazaly, A.E.; Scholl, A.; Salahuddin, S.; Bokor, J. Electrically controlled switching of the magnetization state in multiferroic BaTiO3/CoFe submicrometer structures. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2018, 2, 091402. [Google Scholar]
  4. Gao, H.; Harumoto, T.; Luo, W.; Lan, R.; Feng, H.; Du, Y.; Nakamura, Y.; Shi, J. Room temperature perpendicular exchange bias in CoNi/(Co,Ni)O multilayers with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy directly induced by FM/AFM interface. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2018, 473, 490–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Iwasaki, S.; Nakamura, Y.; Ouchi, K. Perpendicular magnetic recording with a composite anisotropy film. IEEE Trans. Magn. 1979, 15, 1456–1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, M.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, D.; Lyu, X. Mesoporous CoFe alloy@SiO2 nanocapsules with controllable Co/Fe atomic ratio for highly efficient tunable electromagnetic wave absorption. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 802, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Soundararaj, A.; Mohanty, J. Impact of Deposition Potential on Structural and Magnetic Properties of Nano-Crystalline CoFe Alloy Thin Films. Surf. Eng. Appl. Electrochem. 2020, 56, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ha, N.D.; Phan, M.-H.; Kim, C.-O. Influences of rapid annealing and substrate temperature on the magnetic properties of Co-Fe-V films. J. Appl. Phys. 2006, 99, 08F105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Galimberti, P.; Lay, S.; Antoni-Zdziobek, A.; Coindeau, S.; Veron, M.; Bley, F.; De Boissieu, M. Precipitation and hardening behaviour of the Fe20Co18W alloy aged at 800 °C. Intermetallics 2011, 19, 556–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Noce, R.D.; Benedetti, A.V.; Magnani, M.; Passamani, E.C.; Kumar, H.; Cornejo, D.R.; Ospina, C.A. Structural, morphological and magnetic characterization of electrodeposited Co–Fe–W alloys. J. Alloys Compd. 2014, 611, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Prentice, J.J.; Grant-Jacob, J.A.; Shepherd, D.P.; Eason, R.W.; Mackenzie, J.I. Yb-doped mixed-sesquioxide films grown by pulsed laser deposition. J. Cryst. Growth 2018, 491, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sharma, D.K.; Varshney, M.; Shukla, S.; Sharma, K.K.; Kumar, V.; Sharma, A. Assimilation of Yb defect states in ZnO: Structural, optical and magnetic investigations. Vacuum 2020, 179, 109522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Thangeeswari, T.; Parthipan, G.; Gowtham, S. Impact of rare earth (Dy and Yb) ions doping on magnetic and optical properties of ZnO nanoparticles. AIP Conf. Proc. 2019, 2105, 020003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Diaz-Torres, L.; De la Rosa, E.; Salas, P.; Desirena, H. Enhanced cooperative absorption and upconversion in Yb3+doped YAG nanophosphors. Opt. Mater. 2005, 27, 1305–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, W.J.; Ou, S.L.; Chang, Y.H.; Chen, Y.T.; Chiang, M.R.; Hsu, S.C.; Chu, C.L. Adhesive characteristic, surface morphology, and optical properties of Co40Fe40V20 films. Opt.-Int. J. Light and Electron Optics 2020, 216, 164587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, W.-J.; Chen, Y.-T.; Chang, Y.-H.; Chiang, M.-R.; Li, W.-H.; Tseng, J.-Y.; Chi, P.-W.; Wu, T.-H. Structure and Magnetic Properties of Co40Fe40V20 Thin Films. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2019, 19, 5974–5978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Liu, W.J.; Chang, Y.H.; Ou, S.L.; Chen, Y.T.; Li, W.H.; Jhou, T.Y.; Chu, C.C.; Wu, T.H.; Tseng, S.W. Effect of annealing on the structural, magnetic, surface energy and optical properties of Co32Fe30W38 films deposited by direct-current magnetron sputtering. Coatings 2020, 10, 1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ma, K.; Chung, T.S.; Good, R.J. Surface energy of thermotropic liquid crystalline polyesters and polyesteramide. J. Polym. Sci. 1998, 36, 2327–2337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Owens, D.K.; Wendt, R.C. Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1969, 13, 1741–1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kaelble, D.H.; Uy, K.C. A Reinterpretation of Organic Liquid-Polytetrafluoroethylene Surface Interactions. J. Adhes. 1970, 2, 50–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, L.; Wang, T.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, C.-C.; Lv, H.; Lin, H.; Yu, W.-B.; Huang, C.-J. Effects of ytterbium addition and heat treatment on the mechanical properties and biocorrosion behaviors of Mg–Zn–Zr alloy. J. Magnes. Alloy. 2020, 8, 499–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Eckert, J.; Holzer, J.C.; Johnson, W.L. Thermal stability and grain growth behavior of mechanically alloyed nanocrystalline Fe-Cu alloys. J. Appl. Phys. 1993, 73, 131–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Kube, S.A.; Xing, W.; Kalidindi, A.; Sohn, S.; Datye, A.; Amram, D.; Schuh, C.A.; Schroers, J. Combinatorial study of thermal stability in ternary nanocrystalline alloys. Acta Mater. 2020, 188, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Peng, H.; Huang, L.; Liu, F. A thermo-kinetic correlation for grain growth in nanocrystalline alloys. Mater. Lett. 2018, 219, 276–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pachchigar, V.; Ranjan, M.; Mukherjee, S. Role of Hierarchical Protrusions in Water Repellent Superhydrophobic PTFE Surface Produced by Low Energy Ion Beam Irradiation. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 8675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Romero, R.; Martin, F.; Ramos-Barrado, J.; Leinen, D. Synthesis and characterization of nanostructured nickel oxide thin films prepared with chemical spray pyrolysis. Thin Solid Film. 2009, 518, 4499–4502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tavakoli, M.M.; Dastjerdi, H.T.; Zhao, J.; Shulenberger, K.E.; Carbonera, C.; Po, R.; Cominetti, A.; Bianchi, G.; Klein, N.D.; Bawendi, M.G.; et al. Light Management in Organic Photovoltaics Processed in Ambient Conditions Using ZnO Nanowire and Antireflection Layer with Nanocone Array. Small 2019, 15, e1900508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kapustianyk, V.; Turko, B.; Kostruba, A.; Sofiani, Z.; Derkowska, B.; Dabos-Seignon, S.; Barwiński, B.; Eliyashevskyi, Y.; Sahraoui, B. Influence of size effect and sputtering conditions on the crystallinity and optical properties of ZnO thin films. Opt. Commun. 2007, 269, 346–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shaaban, E. Optical constants and fitted transmittance spectra of varies thickness of polycrystalline ZnSe thin films in terms of spectroscopic ellipsometry. J. Alloys Compd. 2013, 563, 274–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chen, H.-L.; Lu, Y.-M.; Hwang, W.-S. Thickness dependence of electrical and optical properties of sputtered nickel oxide films. Thin Solid Film. 2006, 498, 266–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jassim, S.A.-J.; Zumaila, A.A.R.A.; Al Waly, G.A.A. Influence of substrate temperature on the structural, optical and electrical properties of CdS thin films deposited by thermal evaporation. Results Phys. 2013, 3, 173–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Redjdal, N.; Salah, H.; Hauet, T.; Menari, H.; Chérif, S.; Gabouze, N.; Azzaz, M. Microstructural, electrical and magnetic properties of Fe35Co65 thin films grown by thermal evaporation from mechanically alloyed powders. Thin Solid Film. 2014, 552, 164–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Wen, T.; Gong, J.; Peng, Z.; Jiang, D.; Wang, C.; Fu, Z.; Miao, H. Analysis of continuous stiffness data measured during nanoindentation of titanium films on glass substrate. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2011, 125, 500–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wei, P.-J.; Lin, J.-F. A new method developed to evaluate both the hardness and elastic modulus of a coating–substrate system. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2005, 200, 2489–2496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Oliver, W.C.; Pharr, G.M. An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J. Mater. Res. 1992, 7, 1564–1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Venkatraman, R.; Bravman, J.C. Separation of film thickness and grain boundary strengthening effects in Al thin films on Si. J. Mater. Res. 1992, 7, 2040–2048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Beegan, D.; Laugier, M. Application of composite hardness models to copper thin film hardness measurement. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2005, 199, 32–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhang, S.; Sun, D.; Fu, Y.; Du, H. Recent advances of superhard nanocomposite coatings: A review. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2003, 167, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fu, X.; Jiang, J.; Jiang, X. Research Progress in Interfacial Characteristics and Strengthening Mechanisms of Rare Earth Metal Oxide-Reinforced Copper Matrix Composites. Materials 2022, 15, 5350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Wang, K.; Xu, Z.; Huang, Y.; Qiu, Y.; Dong, S. Magnetic, thermal, electrical properties and crystallization kinetics of Co60Fe20B20 alloy films. Sci. China Mater. 2016, 59, 639–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Yang, S.Y.; Chien, J.J.; Wang, W.C.; Yu, C.Y.; Hing, N.S.; Hong, H.E.; Hong, C.Y.; Yang, H.C.; Chang, C.F.; Lin, H.Y. Magnetic nanoparticles for high-sensitivity detection on nucleicacids via superconducting quantum-interference device basedimmunomagnetic reduction assay. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2011, 323, 681–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bhatt, R.C.; Ye, L.-X.; Hai, N.T.; Wu, J.-C.; Wu, T.-H. Spin-flop led peculiar behavior of temperature-dependent anomalous Hall effect in Hf/Gd-Fe-Co. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2021, 537, 168196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kharmouche, A.; Ch´erif, S.M.; Bourzami, A.; Layadi, A.; Schmerber, G. Structural and magnetic properties of evaporated Co/Si(100) and Co/glass thin films. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2004, 37, 2583–2587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of sputtering system.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of sputtering system.
Materials 15 08509 g001
Figure 2. Thin films made of Co40Fe40Yb20 with X-ray diffraction patterns. (a) as-deposited, (b) post-annealing at 100 °C, (c) post-annealing at 200 °C, and (d) post-annealing at 300 °C.
Figure 2. Thin films made of Co40Fe40Yb20 with X-ray diffraction patterns. (a) as-deposited, (b) post-annealing at 100 °C, (c) post-annealing at 200 °C, and (d) post-annealing at 300 °C.
Materials 15 08509 g002aMaterials 15 08509 g002b
Figure 3. Surface energy of Co40Fe40Yb20 thin films.
Figure 3. Surface energy of Co40Fe40Yb20 thin films.
Materials 15 08509 g003
Figure 4. Transmittance of Co40Fe40Yb20 films. (a) RT, (b) following annealing at 100 °C, (c) following annealing at 200 °C, and (d) following annealing at 300 °C.
Figure 4. Transmittance of Co40Fe40Yb20 films. (a) RT, (b) following annealing at 100 °C, (c) following annealing at 200 °C, and (d) following annealing at 300 °C.
Materials 15 08509 g004aMaterials 15 08509 g004b
Figure 5. (a) Resistivity of Co40Fe40Yb20 thin films. (b) Sheet resistance of Co40Fe40Yb20 thin films.
Figure 5. (a) Resistivity of Co40Fe40Yb20 thin films. (b) Sheet resistance of Co40Fe40Yb20 thin films.
Materials 15 08509 g005
Figure 6. Average hardness of the Co40Fe40Yb20 thin films.
Figure 6. Average hardness of the Co40Fe40Yb20 thin films.
Materials 15 08509 g006
Figure 7. The relationship between the low-frequency alternate-current magnetic susceptibility (χac) and frequency. (a) as-deposited, (b) post-annealing at 100 °C, (c) post-annealing at 200 °C, (d) post-annealing at 300 °C.
Figure 7. The relationship between the low-frequency alternate-current magnetic susceptibility (χac) and frequency. (a) as-deposited, (b) post-annealing at 100 °C, (c) post-annealing at 200 °C, (d) post-annealing at 300 °C.
Materials 15 08509 g007aMaterials 15 08509 g007b
Figure 8. Maximum alternate-current magnetic susceptibility for Co40Fe40Yb20 thin films.
Figure 8. Maximum alternate-current magnetic susceptibility for Co40Fe40Yb20 thin films.
Materials 15 08509 g008
Figure 9. (a) In-plane magnetic hysteresis loop of Co40Fe40Yb20 thin films at 50 nm. (b) Saturation magnetization (MS) of Co40Fe40Yb20 at 50 nm.
Figure 9. (a) In-plane magnetic hysteresis loop of Co40Fe40Yb20 thin films at 50 nm. (b) Saturation magnetization (MS) of Co40Fe40Yb20 at 50 nm.
Materials 15 08509 g009
Table 1. Abbreviations and full names of proper nouns.
Table 1. Abbreviations and full names of proper nouns.
AbbreviationFull Name
XRDX-ray diffraction
χaclow-frequency alternative-current magnetic susceptibility
ƒresoptimal resonance frequency
MSsaturation magnetization
MRAMmagnetic random-access memory
PMAperpendicular magnetic anisotropy
Kumagnetic anisotropy constant
CoFecobalt iron
Hccoercivity
TcCurie temperature
Hkmagnetic anisotropy field
RErare-earth
Ybytterbium
YAGyttrium aluminum Garnet
MTJmagnetic tunneling junction
TMRtunneling magnetoresistance
Bboron
RTroom temperature
DCdirect current
Arargon
GIXRDgrazing incidence X-ray diffraction
θcontact angle
DIdeionized
MTSmechanical testing and simulation
CSMcontinuous stiffness measurement
AGMalternating gradient magnetometer
Hextexternal magnetic field
Table 2. Significant properties for CoFeV, CoFeW, and CoFeYb materials.
Table 2. Significant properties for CoFeV, CoFeW, and CoFeYb materials.
MaterialsMaximum χac
(a.u.)
Surface Energy (mJ/mm2)
Glass/Co40Fe40V20 [15,16]
10–100 nm at RT
0.02–0.0427.8–45.4
Glass/Co32Fe30W38 [17]
10–50 nm at RT and annealed conditions
0.02–0.5222.3–28.4
Glass/Co40Fe40Yb20
10–50 nm at RT and annealed conditions
(Current research)
0.04–0.3528.6–34.5
Table 3. Comparing contact angle and surface energy for Co40Fe40Yb20 thin films from different fabrication processes.
Table 3. Comparing contact angle and surface energy for Co40Fe40Yb20 thin films from different fabrication processes.
ProcessThicknessContact Angle with DI Water (θ)Contact Angle with Glycerol (θ)Surface Energy (mJ/mm2)
As-deposited10 nm76.5°70.9°29.47
20 nm74.4°67.9°30.37
30 nm74.6°67.1°30.86
40 nm69.9°65.3°33.02
50 nm68.8°65.1°33.72
Post-annealing 100 °C10 nm81.3°71.4°28.63
20 nm84.0°72.5°29.19
30 nm79.1°71.6°29.45
40 nm74.1°72.0°29.90
50 nm79.8°69.1°30.61
Post-annealing 200 °C10 nm82.5°71.9°28.82
20 nm86.4°72.8°31.46
30 nm71.8°69.6°31.28
40 nm70.9°70.4°32.48
50 nm74.8°66.3°31.52
Post-annealing 300 °C10 nm79.7°71.8°30.17
20 nm71.1°68.3°32.45
30 nm77.5°67.7°32.35
40 nm77.1°64.7°34.54
50 nm74.8°63.7°34.23
Table 4. The optimal resonance frequency for various thicknesses of films.
Table 4. The optimal resonance frequency for various thicknesses of films.
Thickness
(nm)
As-Deposited Optimal Resonance Frequency (Hz)Post-Annealing at 100 °C of Optimal Resonance Frequency (Hz)Post-Annealing at 200 °C of Optimal Resonance Frequency (Hz)Post-Annealing at 300 °C of Optimal Resonance Frequency (Hz)
10100505050
20501005050
3050505050
4050505050
5050505050
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, W.-J.; Chang, Y.-H.; Chiang, C.-C.; Fern, C.-L.; Chen, Y.-T.; Chen, Y.-H.; Liao, H.-W.; Wu, T.-H.; Lin, S.-H.; Lin, K.-W.; et al. Effect of Annealing and Thickness of Co40Fe40Yb20 Thin Films on Various Physical Properties on a Glass Substrate. Materials 2022, 15, 8509. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15238509

AMA Style

Liu W-J, Chang Y-H, Chiang C-C, Fern C-L, Chen Y-T, Chen Y-H, Liao H-W, Wu T-H, Lin S-H, Lin K-W, et al. Effect of Annealing and Thickness of Co40Fe40Yb20 Thin Films on Various Physical Properties on a Glass Substrate. Materials. 2022; 15(23):8509. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15238509

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Wen-Jen, Yung-Huang Chang, Chia-Chin Chiang, Chi-Lon Fern, Yuan-Tsung Chen, Ying-Hsuan Chen, Hao-Wen Liao, Te-Ho Wu, Shih-Hung Lin, Ko-Wei Lin, and et al. 2022. "Effect of Annealing and Thickness of Co40Fe40Yb20 Thin Films on Various Physical Properties on a Glass Substrate" Materials 15, no. 23: 8509. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15238509

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop