Next Article in Journal
Enhanced PTC Effect in Polyamide/Carbon Black Composites
Previous Article in Journal
A Comparative Study of Additive and Subtractive Manufacturing Techniques for a Zirconia Dental Product: An Analysis of the Manufacturing Accuracy and the Bond Strength of Porcelain to Zirconia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Experimental Evaluation of Industrial Mushroom Waste Substrate Using Hybrid Mechanism of Vermicomposting and Effective Microorganisms
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 15
Issue 15
10.3390/ma15155397
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Experimental and Computational Study of Mechanical and Thermal Characteristics of h-BN and GNP Infused Polymer Composites for Elevated Temperature Applications

by
Mantesh C. Choukimath
1,
Nagaraj R. Banapurmath
1,*,
Fahid Riaz
2,*,
Arun Y. Patil
1,
Arun R. Jalawadi
1,
M. A. Mujtaba
3,
Kiran Shahapurkar
4,
T. M. Yunus Khan
5,
Mishal Alsehli
6,
Manzoore Elahi M. Soudagar
7,8 and
I. M. R. Fattah
9,10,*
1
School of Mechanical Engineering, KLE Technological University, Hubballi 580031, India
2
Mechanical Engineering Department, Abu Dhabi University, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 59911, United Arab Emirates
3
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
4
Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Mechanical, Chemical and Materials Engineering, Adama Science and Technology University, Adama 1888, Ethiopia
5
Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia
6
Mechanical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia
7
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University Centre for Research & Development, Chandigarh University, Mohali 140413, India
8
Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Technology, Glocal University, SH-57, Mirzapur Pole, Saharanpur District, Uttar Pradesh 247121, India
9
Centre for Technology in Water and Wastewater (CTWW), Faculty of Engineering and IT, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
10
Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Kajang 43000, Malaysia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(15), 5397; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15155397
Submission received: 16 May 2022 / Revised: 5 July 2022 / Accepted: 8 July 2022 / Published: 5 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applied Engineering Materials: Development, Characterization, Statistical Analysis, Simulation, and Soft Computing)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Polymer-based nanocomposites are being considered as replacements for conventional materials in medium to high-temperature applications. This article aims to discover the synergistic effects of reinforcements on the developed polymer-based nanocomposite. An epoxy-based polymer composite was manufactured by reinforcing graphene nanoplatelets (GNP) and h-boron nitride (h-BN) nanofillers. The composites were prepared by varying the reinforcements with the step of 0.1 from 0.1 to 0.6%. Ultrasonication was carried out to ensure the homogenous dispersion of reinforcements. Mechanical, thermal, functional, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis was carried out on the novel manufactured composites. The evaluation revealed that the polymer composite with GNP 0.2 by wt % has shown an increase in load-bearing capacity by 265% and flexural strength by 165% compared with the pristine form, and the polymer composite with GNP and h-BN 0.6 by wt % showed an increase in load-bearing capacity by 219% and flexural strength by 114% when compared with the pristine form. Furthermore, the evaluation showed that the novel prepared nanocomposite reinforced with GNP and h-BN withstands a higher temperature, around 340 °C, which is validated by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) trials. The numerical simulation model is implemented to gather the synthesised nanocomposite’s best composition and mechanical properties. The minor error between the simulation and experimental data endorses the model’s validity. To demonstrate the industrial applicability of the presented material, a case study is proposed to predict the temperature range for compressor blades of gas turbine engines containing nanocomposite material as the substrate and graphene/h-BN as reinforcement particles.

1. Introduction

In today’s research world, considerable interest has been shifted toward polymer composites embedded with nanofillers and microfillers for high-end technological applications [1]. Many nanofillers are currently used as a strength, temperature, and other property-enhancing catalysts: to name a few, Titanium oxide (TiO2), Molybdenum disulphide (MoS2), Aluminium oxide (Al2O3), Silicon carbide (SiC) and many more [2,3]. These nanocomposites have proven to enhance the material’s mechanical, physical, thermal, and tribological properties [4,5,6,7]. However, in recent days, h-BN is another such nanofiller that is quite similar in properties to MoS2 and graphite [8]. It works at around 900 °C with high thermal stability when compared to MoS2 (1150 °C), Tungsten disulphide (1200 °C), and graphite (3000 °C) [9]. Thermal management systems, neutron shielding, sensors, and improving the thermal and mechanical performances of composites are some of the broad application areas of h-BN-based polymer composites. As per recent studies, h-BN is anticipated to generate around USD 900 million by 2023 [10]. In recent years, much consideration has been given to nano h-BN because of its improved properties (e.g., mechanical strength, high thermal resistance, etc.). h-BN is being utilised progressively due to its excellent combination of properties, which consist of a low density (2.27 g/cm3), high-temperature steadiness, and chemical inertness (corrosion resistance against acids and molten metals) [11,12,13].
GNPs have tremendous scope for multifunctional properties. GNPs comprise minute stacks of graphene sheets having a platelet structure similar to those observed in carbon nanotubes in the generic planar form [14]. GNPs can enhance mechanical properties such as the stiffness, strength, and surface hardness of the matrix material. Polymer-based composites have multi-facets. Epoxy resin thermoset is well known for its low shrinkage after curing, excellent mechanical properties, high chemical stability, and better adhesive bond strength. In addition, the epoxy polymer has anti-wear behaviour during curing [14,15]. Epoxy resin has a broad application in adhesive, composite, and protective coating.
The dispersion technique is crucial for ensuring nanoparticle (NPs) distribution in the polymer matrix. The maximum dosage of NPs in the holding matrix is limited due to critical issues associated with the dispersion technique. Ultrasonication is one such process used in the dispersion of NPs uniformly in the matrix material [16].
Tsuji et al. [17] have reported the science behind the adhesion between epoxy matrix and filler materials such as h-BN and graphite. Owais et al. [18] have emphasised the synergetic effect of different fillers in the epoxy matrix, which has resulted in the enhanced thermal conductivity and electrical resistivity of epoxy nanocomposites. Shi et al. [19] emphasised the improvement in the thermal conductivity of h-BN infused epoxy-based composites. Sun et al. [20] have focused on the overall design and fabrication of Boron nitride microsphere/epoxy composites with good cross-plane thermal conductivity and lower dielectric properties. Gu et al. [21] and Ren et al. [22] have significantly increased thermal conductivity with respect to h-BN embedded polymer composites.
Zhang et al. [23,24] have reported the failure mechanisms of anisotropic conductive films due to the thermal degradation of epoxy material when subjected to temperatures beyond 300 °C and also emphasised the effects of acrylic adhesive property with respect to bonding parameters.
Chung et al. [25] found that the surface treatment of the h-BN particles using the silane 3-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane (GPTMS) has increased thermal conductivity. Jiang et al. [26] highlighted the synergistic effect of functionalised graphene/boron nitride on the thermal conductivity of polystyrene composites. The authors found an enhancement of up to 20% compared with the plain composite. Ejaz et al. [27] have reported the role of GNPs (lower dosage) in improving the strength parameters of epoxy-based adhesive material.
The literature survey scantly highlights the usage of nanofillers with h-BN and GNPs embedded in an epoxy and polyimide matrix for high-temperature applications. Currently, the existing works do not fulfil the high-temperature conditions catering to generic structural applications. Therefore, the present work focuses on the experimental studies and numerical analysis of epoxy reinforced with h-BN and GNP composites for structural applications by varying the reinforcements with the step of 0.1 from 0.1 to 0.6%. To further validate the benefits of this study, this research proposes a case study that uses a simulation of polyimide reinforced with both h-BN and GNP composites for the design of a compressor blade to demonstrate the industrial applicability of novel composite manufactured.
The current work focuses on optimal composition development of h-BN/GNP reinforced in epoxy/polyimide substrate. Furthermore, the future scope of work can be considered for building a working prototype to realise applications in real time for thermal and structural domains.

2. Material and Methodology

The properties of the GNP and h-BN used in this work are mentioned in Table 1; the GNPs and h-BNs were industrial grades with purity ≥ 99.5% and 99.9%. For the current studies, GNP and h-BN NPs were procured from Nanoshell Pvt. Ltd. Punjab, India. The matrix epoxy (Trade name—Lapox—L12, Hardener—K6) material used for the current work was procured from Atul Pvt. Ltd. Polymer division, Gujarat, India. Throughout the fabrication of polymer nanocomposites, GNP and h-BNs were dispersed uniformly. The most crucial step in combining GNP and h-BNs is diffusion. The ultrasonication technique, ultrasonication duration, and specimen casting procedures were all kept constant in all polymer composite preparations. As shown in Table 2, varying amounts of GNP and h-BNs were incorporated into the polymer composite matrix. The prepared composite solution has undergone an ultrasonication process for 50 min to attain the composite’s uniform dispersion.
The simulation work is carried out using a design modeller (CAD tool) and ANSYS workbench mechanical with version 18.2. The exhaustive simulation work led to an outcome of a compressor blade coating materials at an intermediate temperature range of 400 to 500 °C.

2.1. Preparation of Specimens

The GNPs with a purity level of 99.5%, h-BNs with a purity level of 99.9% and a concentration of 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.3%, 0.4%, 0.5% and 0.6% [27] by the total weight of the epoxy matrix was used for the investigation. Two types of composites were prepared. One composite plate was reinforced with only GNP, and the other one was reinforced with GNP and h-BN, as shown in Table 2 and Table 3, in equal proportion. A hardener containing 10% of the weight of plain epoxy matrix was added to start the crystallisation process. To ensure the better dispersion of nanofillers into the parent matrix, all composite mixtures were sonicated for 50 min. The composite was prepared using aluminium moulds with dimensions of 230 mm × 164 mm × 6 mm. The specimens were kept for 24 h of curing. The composite plates were carefully removed from the mould after the curing process. Figure 1a shows the aluminium mould used to prepare composite plates; Figure 1b shows the typical epoxy composite plate (0.2 wt % GNP + h-BN) composite plate sample after removing from the aluminium mould.

Testing Standards

Tensile test specimens were prepared according to ASTM D3039. Table 4 shows the details of the ASTM D3039 [28].
The GNP-based composite specimen details utilised for the 3-point bending analysis were prepared as per ASTM (D7264) [29] and shown in Table 5.
The GNP and h-BN based composite specimen details used for the four-point bending test were prepared as per ASTM (D7264) [29] and are shown in Table 6.

2.2. Experimental Setup

2.2.1. Tensile Test

The tensile test of the PE and prepared nanocomposites was carried out to determine Young’s Modulus (MPa), tensile strength (MPa), and percentage strain failure. Tensile specimens were cut as per ASTM D3039 standards, and testing was carried out in a Tinius Olsen UTM (10 kN capacity) with fixtures movement at 3 mm/min. In total, four specimens were tested for all the combinations, and the results were averaged.

2.2.2. Flexural Test

The flexural properties of PE and nanocomposites were determined using the three-point bending and four-point bending method; these tests are being performed as per ASTM (D7264) standard, and testing was carried out in a Tinius Olsen UTM (10 kN capacity). The flexural modulus and strength were determined from these tests. In total, four specimens were tested for all the combinations, and the results were averaged. The loading was made until the rupture of the external surface of the sample or until a strain reaches a maximum value of 5%, whichever is earlier. A strain rate of 3 mm/min was set for the testing conditions.

2.2.3. Thermogravimetric Analysis

TGA is a method of thermal analysis in which changes in physical and chemical properties of materials are measured as a function of increasing temperature (with constant heating rate) or as a function of time (with constant temperature and/or constant mass loss). Changes in the mass of a sample due to various thermal conditions are studied while the sample is subjected to a program of change in temperature. The TGA was performed in a nitrogen atmosphere and the specimens were subjected to varying temperatures from 25 to 600 °C with a rise in temperature at 10 °C per minute.

2.2.4. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)

The elemental composition of the prepared composites was studied by the FTIR route. The mid-infrared region of 400 to 4000 wavenumbers, which equals wavelengths of 2.5 to 25 microns (10−3 mm), was used during the test to find out the elemental composition of the prepared specimens.

2.2.5. SEM and Energy-Dispersive X-ray Analysis (EDX)

Scanning Electron Microscopy involves imaging samples with the help of electrons. The large depth of field of SEM allows a large amount of sample to be focused at an instant. SEM analysis is used to study the dispersion of nanoparticles in the polymer matrix. A continuous beam of electrons having a wavelength lower than ordinary light is made to fall on the specimen. The back-reflected electrons from the sample, called secondary electrons, are detected in a detector that prepares the SEM image based on the raster scan technique. Specifications of the machine used for SEM imaging are highlighted in Table 7.
The EDX instrument, which is an optional attachment to the JEOL JSM-63OLA, was used for the elemental analysis. The specifications of the EDX instrument are highlighted in Table 8.

3. Results and Discussion

To comprehend the behaviour of the developed composites, the required quantity of reinforcing agents such as GNP and h-BN in the matrix material was evaluated based on the optimum value of load-bearing capacity, increased ductility, and material degradation of the nanocomposites with temperature rise, the tensile test, 4-point bending, 3-point bending and TGA tests.

3.1. Tensile Strength Test

3.1.1. Tensile Test for GNP Based Nanocomposites

This test helps to evaluate the ideal weight percentage of GNP and h-BN for reinforcing with the epoxy matrix for enhancement of the ductile property of the composites. There were in total seven specimens conducted for the tensile strength test; the results were compared between the plain epoxy composite and epoxy nanocomposites reinforced with GNP and h-BN to understand the changes incurred due to reinforcement. Figure 2 shows the variation of the ultimate tensile load for composite reinforced with only GNP. Figure 2 shows that the tensile strength increases as the GNP filler increases. This behaviour is observed until 0.2 wt % of the nanocomposites; this could be due to the homogeneous distribution of GNP fillers in the parent matrix [29], as seen in the SEM micrograph in Figure 8b. The load-bearing capacity of the composite reinforced with GNP (0.2 wt %) increased by 265% compared with the plain epoxy composite.

3.1.2. Tensile Test for GNP and h-BN Based Nanocomposites

Figure 2 also shows the variation of the ultimate tensile load for composite reinforced with GNP and h-BN, respectively. Figure 2 shows that a higher dosage of both GNP and h-BN fillers in the matrix increased the tensile load-bearing capacity. It was observed that with an increase in filler concentration, the composite material’s tensile strength (TS) was increased. The epoxy composite reinforced with GNP and h-BN increased even at a 0.6 weight percentage. The reinforced composite’s load-bearing capacity with GNP and h-BN (0.6 wt %) increased by 219% compared with the plain epoxy composite. However, this behaviour resulted from GNP and h-BN fillers occupying the air pockets, which were open in the pristine epoxy resin. The possible reason for enhancing the results might be the homogenous distribution of fillers in the polymer substrate [29].

3.2. Three-Point Bending Test for GNP-Based Composites

Figure 3 shows the variation of the maximum flexural stress for composite reinforced with only GNP. Figure 3 shows that a lower dosage of GNP favoured enhanced flexural strength more than the higher dosage, as the latter results in an agglomeration of the nanofillers as seen in SEM micrographs. The developed polymer composite material’s flexural tests show that the addition of GNPs into the polymer matrix increases the polymer composite’s load-bearing capacity as the filler material increases to 0.2 wt % of epoxy. This could be due to the proper dispersion of GNP particles throughout the matrix and the resulting strength of the nanocomposite material. The trend of declination is 33 MPa when compared to 0.5 wt % of GNP. Nevertheless, as the filler material increases, the material’s brittleness will enhance due to the shear yielding and deformation of these filler materials. They form irregular patterns even though they are uniformly spread throughout the polymer composites matrix as the load-bearing capacity of the composites decreases.

3.3. Four-Point Bending Test

The four-point bending test provides the modulus of elasticity bending, flexural strain, flexural stress, flexural stress–strain response, and maximum load-bearing capacity of the materials synthesised. Figure 4 shows that maximum flexural stress increased with an increase in the dosage of the GNP and h-BN. The optimum result is obtained at 0.6 wt %. This behaviour is due to the proper dispersion of the nanoparticles in the polymer matrix, as witnessed in the SEM images.

3.4. Thermogravimetric Analysis

TGA is performed to study the nanocomposite’s thermal stability. An optimal sample is considered based on the maximum strength of tensile and flexural tests for the brevity of this work. Prepared composites (both GNP and GNP+h-BN based) were subjected to varying temperatures from 25 to 600 °C with a rise in temperature at 10 °C per minute [29]. Figure 5a shows the TGA analysis of nanocomposites reinforced with GNP. Figure 5b shows the TGA analysis of nanocomposites reinforced with a combination of GNP and h-BN. A 1.3% degradation in the mass occurred at a temperature (Td1.3%) of around 242 °C for the plain epoxy specimen.
In contrast, the same percentage of mass degradation occurs at a temperature of about 340.99 °C for the polymer composite with 0.2 wt % of GNP and 342.43 °C for polymer reinforced with GNP and h-BN at 0.6 wt %. Thus, there was an increase of 40.9%, i.e., an increase of 99 °C for the polymer composite reinforced with GNP compared to a plain epoxy specimen. Furthermore, an increase of 41.5%, i.e., 101.3 °C for the polymer composite reinforced with GNP and h-BN, is obtained compared to the plain epoxy specimen. A 10% residual at a temperature above 500 °C is observed for the polymer nanocomposites, while plain epoxy showed a comparatively lower temperature [29].
Figure 6 shows the TGA test results of nanocomposites reinforced with optimised values wt % of GNP (0.2%) and GH (0.6%). Compared to GH-based composites, GNP filler resulted in higher thermal stability, as is evident from the figure.

3.5. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy

This test helps to understand the bonding between the matrix and filler material used. The FTIR test results of the composites with a varied dosage of nanofillers are carried out. However, for the discussions, an optimal sample is considered based on the higher load-bearing capacity for tensile and flexural test conditions.
Figure 7a shows the FTIR spectrum of polymer composite reinforced with the optimum GNP quantity, i.e., 0.2 wt % of epoxy composites. The peaks corresponding to the amine N-H stretch appear at 3316 cm−1. The peaks at 1507 cm−1 correspond to the presence of the nitro compound group. Furthermore, absorption peaks that occur at 826 cm−1 confirmed the presence of the aromatic C-H bending group. The FTIR spectrum of polymer composite reinforced with the optimum quantity of GNP and h-BN, i.e., 0.6 weight percentage of epoxy composites, is shown in Figure 7b. The peaks corresponding to the amine N-H stretch appear at 3315 cm−1. The peaks at 1508 cm−1 correspond to the presence of the nitro compound group. Furthermore, absorption peaks that occur at 743 cm−1 confirmed the presence of the aromatic C-H bending group [29].

3.6. Scanning Electron Microscope Analysis

The morphology and microstructure of the nanocomposites fracture surface were investigated using an ultrahigh-resolution field emission. SEM is used to investigate the nanoscale interaction of fillers in the holding matrix.
Figure 8 shows micrographs of nanocomposites with GNP reinforcement varied from 0.1 to 0.2 wt % of the parent matrix. Figure 8a infers that smaller voids are visible with lower GNP dosage. Figure 8b shows a uniform distribution of GNP resulting in the formation of interconnected layers, with minimal voids resulting in enhanced mechanical properties [30].
Figure 9 shows that the micrographs of nanocomposites reinforced with GNP and h-BN nanoparticles varied from 0.5 to 0.6 wt % of the parent matrix. From Figure 9a, an agglomeration of the filler material in localised regions was observed. The fractured surface shows an intergranular behaviour of failure, which usually occurs in metal-based compounds. Increasing the dosage of GNP and h-BN from 0.5 to 0.6 wt % in the matrix shows a homogeneous distribution of the fillers throughout the entire substrate. The failure of a composite with a filler material combination results in brittle fracture, similar to a concrete control mix [31].
The EDX analysis validates the number of elemental compounds present in the prepared composites. Table 9 and Table 10 show the elements and the weight percentage of the specimen used. Elements C and O correspond to the epoxy and GNP constituents, and B and N correspond to the h-BN based composite. The combination of GNP and h-BN at 0.6 wt % has enhanced mechanical properties concerning strength and stiffness; this might be due to the percentage rise in boron, nitrogen and oxygen compared to 0.4 wt % h-BN with epoxy resin.

4. Simulation of Polymer-Based Nanocomposites

Industry internet of things (IIOT) has come to the limelight in the last few years with most care for simulation in the design field [32]. The simulation covers software tools with a background such as the finite element method, molecular dynamics, and solid mechanics. Ansys, J-OCTA, Material studio and current software tools are used to analyse the newer materials developed [33]. In this work, the ANSYS workbench is considered as a tool to validate the experimental results.
This section validates the mechanical properties such as total deformation and Von Mises stress of the epoxy-based nanocomposites using a combination of h-BN and GNP as fillers. The lower TGA of epoxy-based nanocomposites demands a higher TGA-based matrix material for high-temperature applications such as compressor blades and internal combustion parts. Polyimide-based nanocomposites were developed for this high-temperature application using ANSYS-based simulation, and the results were predicted solely by numerical methods.
Section 4.1 discusses the numerical results on the epoxy-based nanocomposites reinforced with h-BN and GNP combinations and validation with the experimental work.
Section 4.2 discusses the numerical results of the polyimide-based nanocomposites reinforced with hBN and GNP. The result was validated using the convergence theory.

4.1. Simulation Method

Among the simulation software, ANSYS workbench is currently the leading tool in the industry and can solve multidisciplinary problems. The roadmap for solving this current problem has been considered with the following process map, as shown in Figure 10. Figure 10 discusses the experimental and simulation study in the stepwise process. The entire study ends with a comparative study between the experiment and simulation. The work in the experiment initiates with the procurement of raw materials such as epoxy resin, h-BN and GNP. Then, it involves preparing the raw material to be ready for specimen development and further maintaining the specimen shape and size as per ASTM standards. Afterwards, there is the finalisation of the composition for the hand lay-up method and testing in micro UTM. On the other side, simulation work was carried out in the ANSYS workbench with input parameters such as material property, loads and boundary conditions resulting in deformation and stress values depending on the test conditions, either tensile or flexural. These outcome parameters were compared with experimental results, and an optimal model was re-developed physical and tested for final validation.

4.1.1. Simulation Process

The current simulation tool deals with the flexural strength test geometry model, leading to deformation estimation [33]. For better correlation purposes, one case with PE + 0.6 wt % of GNP was considered with several iterations to converge the solution along with validation.

4.1.2. Material Properties

Details of the material properties of the h-BN and GNP, along with epoxy resin, are shown in Table 11.

4.1.3. Geometry

As mentioned in the earlier section, the CAD model was developed with a suitable size and shape. The model is shown in Figure 11. The entire CAD model is divided into three main clusters; firstly, the main substrate is made out of epoxy resin with a specimen size of 135 mm × 15 mm × 6 mm. However, h-BN and GNP are used separately and built as per a weight ratio of 0.6%. These are built randomly in the entire substrate, matching the weight fraction of the epoxy resin. The focus is to match the composition by weight fraction with h-BN and GNP. The h-BN and GNP cluster is oriented, assuming they will have random directions when mixed in real time before solidification. An ideal condition is arrived at based on the number of iterations to mimic this orientation behaviour. The convergence study is carried out to correlate the compatibility equations with the H-type and P-type methods. The focus here is to reduce the number of experiments by achieving the optimal condition in the dispersion process [34].

4.1.4. Contact Generation

Contact generation between h-BN/GNP and epoxy is assigned with ‘Bonded’ contact. Each of these contacts was considered with a ‘Pure penalty’ approach [35,36]. The details of contact generation are illustrated in Figure 12.

4.1.5. Mesh Generation

Mesh generation has been assigned with mapped face meshing to arrive at the exact solution. The H-type and P-type methods were used to analyse the results. The process uses a tetrahedron element with ten nodes of the second-order condition [37]. From Figure 13, it provides satisfactory mesh conditions while checking other converging conditions. The entire model was solved for 326,363 elements and 857,067 nodes.

4.1.6. Loads and Boundary Conditions

The details were fetched from experimental analysis to arrive at loads and boundary conditions. The three-point bend test is considered with displacement free in the y-direction, while the other two directions were fixed. Figure 14 illustrates the loading details and boundary conditions.

4.1.7. Results and Interpretation

The total deformation has been extracted from the analysis, and details are discussed in Figure 15 [38]. The total deformation observed is 2.56 mm, which is more than 16% higher than the experimental work, but for a typical composite material, the percentage difference should be below 20%. This validates the aforementioned results.

4.1.8. Comparative Study with Validation

Experimental method results were then compared with simulation results with tabular data, as shown in Table 12. The comparative study reveals a percentage error of 16.36, which is well accepted by an industry standard for a composite material; the acceptable error range is 20% [39,40,41].

4.2. h-Boron Nitride and Graphene with Polyimide Substrate

A compressor blade with h-BN and GNP coatings is used to validate the results with polyimide as the substrate. The current application is derived from a gas turbine engine compressor blade. Furthermore, details of the simulation are discussed in Figure 16a–g.
The application selected is based on the subject of temperature, torque and boundary conditions. A similar kind of work on compressor blades was observed in the case of rigid viscoelastic compressor blades by Zhan et al. [42], with strain values 0.22 to 0.47 for given loads and boundary conditions. Temperature gradient and heat flux-based works are scantly reported. In contrast, a structural analysis of compressor blades for gas turbine blades observed a stress field in the blade in the vicinity of t = 0.1 s where bending motions are dominant [43]. In another work, safe fatigue life reduces by about 32% in the case of 8B (rotor blade design) and 40% in the case of 8C (rotor blade design) compared with conventional approaches where aerodynamic forces are omitted [44]. All these are typical cases observed for compressor blades at various loads and boundary conditions.
From Figure 16b, it can be inferred that ‘Bonded’ contact is generated between the blade and base plate as a weldment. The simulation carried out for graphene combination shows a total heat flux of 1.27 × 10 8 W/μm2. The temperature was raised from 500 to 510 °C for both GNP and h-BN material, making it a non-thermal material to dissipate heat comparatively higher than other thermal barrier materials currently in use.

5. Conclusions

The experimental and simulation research indicated that the novel polymer composites reinforced with GNP and h-BN showed better performance than plain epoxy composites. The main conclusions drawn follow.
It was observed that an increase in filler material concentration resulted in an increased tensile property. Still, this nature was observed only up to 0.2 weight percent of the epoxy composite reinforced with GNP, which was followed by a gradual decrease with a higher dosage of GNP. The properties of epoxy composite reinforced with GNP and h-BN increased even at a 0.6 weight percentage. This nature may be because of the nanoparticle’s uniform distribution in the epoxy matrix, as shown in SEM analysis. The composite’s load-bearing capacity with GNP increased by 265% compared with the plain epoxy composite. The composite’s load-bearing capacity with GNP and h-BN increased by 219% compared with the plain epoxy composite.
TGA revealed that the GNP and h-BN reinforced epoxy composite hindered the mass degradation regarding elevated temperature. The material degradation for plain epoxy composites was started at a temperature of around 242 °C. However, the material degradation for epoxy composites reinforced with GNP and GH was started at a temperature of around 340.99 °C and 342.43 °C, respectively. In other words, the initial 1.3% material degradation was enhanced by 40.9% and 41.5% compared to plain epoxy composite.
The numerical simulation using ANSYS workbench to reach the optimal composition endorsed a small error in experiments, less than 20% error, and more than 83% confidence level.
Hence, the novel proposed polymer nanocomposite reinforced with GNP and h-BN can be used for high-temperature applications around 340 °C. This composite with reduced weight and increased mechanical strength can substitute for ceramic-based composites.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.C.C., N.R.B. and A.Y.P.; methodology, M.C.C., N.R.B., A.Y.P. and M.A.; investigation, M.C.C., A.R.J. and M.A.; resources, N.R.B., M.A.M., K.S. and M.A.; formal analysis, M.C.C., A.Y.P., A.R.J. and I.M.R.F.; validation, M.C.C., A.Y.P., A.R.J., M.A.M. and F.R.; writing—original draft preparation, M.C.C., A.R.J., T.M.Y.K., K.S. and I.M.R.F.; writing—review and editing, M.C.C., M.E.M.S., A.Y.P. and K.S.; supervision, N.R.B. and F.R.; project administration, F.R. and M.E.M.S.; funding acquisition and research support, F.R., M.A., T.M.Y.K. and I.M.R.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research has been funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University, Research Group Program R.G.P. 2/129/43; the office of Research and Sponsored Programs of Abu Dhabi University and Taif University Researchers Supporting Project Number (TURSP-2020/205), Taif University.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University for funding this work through the research group program R.G.P. 2/129/43. This research has been partially funded by the Office of Research and Sponsored Programs of Abu Dhabi University. Also, this study was supported by Taif University Researchers Supporting Project Number (TURSP-2020/205), Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Khan, I.; Saeed, I.; Khan, I. Nanoparticles: Properties, applications and toxicities. Arab. J. Chem. 2019, 12, 908–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lim, J.V.; Bee, S.T.; Tin Sin, L.; Ratnam, C.T.; Abdul Hamid, Z.A. A Review on the Synthesis, Properties, and Utilities of Functionalized Carbon Nanoparticles for Polymer Nanocomposites. Polymers 2021, 13, 3547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chan, J.X.; Wong, J.F.; Petrů, M.; Hassan, A.; Nirmal, U.; Othman, N.; Ilyas, R.A. Effect of Nanofillers on Tribological Properties of Polymer Nanocomposites: A Review on Recent Development. Polymers 2021, 13, 286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chang, L.; Friedrich, K. Enhancement effect of nanoparticles on the sliding wear of short fiber-reinforced polymer composites: A critical discussion of wear mechanisms. Tribol. Int. 2010, 43, 2355–2364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shi, S.-C.; Chen, T.-H.; Mandal, P.K. Enhancing the Mechanical and Tribological Properties of Cellulose Nanocomposites with Aluminum Nanoadditives. Polymers 2020, 12, 1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Moghadam, A.D.; Omrani, E.; Menezes, P.L.; Rohatgi, P.K. Mechanical and tribological properties of self-lubricating metal matrix nanocomposites reinforced by carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and graphene—A review. Compos. Part B Eng. 2015, 77, 402–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ji, Z.; Zhang, L.; Xie, G.; Xu, W.; Guo, D.; Luo, J.; Prakash, B. Mechanical and tribological properties of nanocomposites incorporated with two-dimensional materials. Friction 2020, 8, 813–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ribeiro, H.; Trigueiro, J.P.; Lopes, M.C.; Pedrotti, J.J.; Woellner, C.F.; Silva, W.M.; Silva, G.G.; Ajayan, P.M. Enhanced thermal conductivity and mechanical properties of hybrid MoS2/h-BN polyurethane nanocomposites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018, 135, 46560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Backes, C.; Abdelkader, A.M.; Alonso, C.; Andrieux-Ledier, A.; Arenal, R.; Azpeitia, J.; Balakrishnan, N.; Banszerus, L.; Barjon, J.; Bartali, R.; et al. Production and processing of graphene and related materials. 2D Mater. 2020, 7, 022001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hexagonal Boron Nitride Market by Type (Tubes, Rods, Plates, Gaskets, Crucibles, Sheets and Others), By Application (Electrical Insulation, Lubrication Industrial, Coatings & Mold Release, Cosmetics, Composites, Thermal Spray and Others) and—Forecast till 2030, MRFR/CnM/1279-CR, September 2018. Available online: https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/hexagonal-boron-nitride-market-1811 (accessed on 9 June 2022).
  11. Li, T.; Hsu, S. Enhanced Thermal Conductivity of Polyimide Films via a Hybrid of Micro- and Nano-Sized Boron Nitride. J. Phys. Chem. B 2010, 114, 6825–6829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wu, X.; Wang, Z.; Chen, J.; Wang, X.; Qu, X. Research on Preparation and Performance of Epoxy Resin-Boron Nitride Thermal-Conductive Composite. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 394, 022052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Choukimath, M.C.; Banapurmath, N.R.; Patil, A.Y.; Hemadri, S.; Jalawadi, A.R. Light weight polymer Nano composites reinforced with h-BN for high temperature applications. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 872, 012112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Shen, M.-Y.; Liao, W.-Y.; Wang, T.-Q.; Lai, W.-M. Characteristics and Mechanical Properties of Graphene Nanoplatelets-Reinforced Epoxy Nanocomposites: Comparison of Different Dispersal Mechanisms. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sukanto, H.; Raharjo, W.W.; Ariawan, D.; Triyono, J.; Kaavesina, M. Epoxy resins thermosetting for mechanical engineering. Open Eng. 2021, 11, 797–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cohen, S.; Zelikman, E.; Suckeveriene, R.Y. Ultrasonically Induced Polymerization and Polymer Grafting in the Presence of Carbonaceous Nanoparticles. Processes 2020, 8, 1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tsuji, Y.; Kitamura, Y.; Someya, M.; Takano, T.; Yaginuma, M.; Nakanishi, K.; Yoshizawa, K. Adhesion of Epoxy Resin with Hexagonal Boron Nitride and Graphite. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 4491–4504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Owais, M.; Zhao, J.; Imani, A.; Wang, G.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Z. Synergetic effect of hybrid fillers of boron nitride, graphene nanoplatelets, and short carbon fibers for enhanced thermal conductivity and electrical resistivity of epoxy nanocomposites. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2019, 117, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shi, Y.; Lin, G.; Ma, X.; Huang, X.; Zhao, J.; Luo, H.; Sun, D. Boron nitride nanoplatelets as two-dimensional thermal fillers in epoxy composites: New scenarios at very low filler loadings. J. Polym. Eng. 2020, 40, 859–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sun, J.; Wang, D.; Yao, Y.; Zeng, X.; Pan, G.; Huang, Y.; Hu, J.; Sun, R.; Xu, J.; Wong, C. Boron nitride microsphere/epoxy composites with enhanced thermal conductivity. Special Issue: Thermally Conductive but Electrically Insulating Materials for High Voltage Applications. High Volt. 2017, 2, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gu, J.; Zhang, Q.; Dang, J.; Xie, C. Thermal conductivity epoxy resin composites filled with boron nitride. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2011, 36, 1025–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ren, J.; Li, Q.; Yan, L.; Jia, L.; Huang, X.; Zhao, L.; Ran, Q.; Fu, M. Enhanced thermal conductivity of epoxy composites by introducing graphene @ boron nitride nanosheets hybrid nanoparticles. Mater. Des. 2020, 191, 108663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, S.; Park, J.; Paik, K. Joint Morphologies and Failure Mechanisms of Anisotropic Conductive Films (ACFs) During a Power Handling Capability Test for Flex-On-Board Applications. IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Manuf. Technol. 2016, 6, 1820–1826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, S.; Lin, T.; He, P.; Paik, K. Effects of acrylic adhesives property and optimized bonding parameters on Sn-58Bi solder joint morphology for flex-on-board assembly. Microelectron. Reliab. 2017, 78, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chung, S.; Lin, J. Thermal Conductivity of Epoxy Resin Composites Filled with Combustion Synthesized h-BN Particles. Molecules 2016, 21, 670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jiang, F.; Cui, X.; Song, N.; Shi, L.; Ding, P. Synergistic effect of functionalized graphene/boron nitride on the thermal conductivity of polystyrene composites. Compos. Commun. 2020, 20, 100350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ejaz, H.; Mubashar, A.; Uddin, E.; Ali, Z.; Arif, N. Effect of functionalized and non-functionalized GNPs addition on strength properties of high viscous epoxy adhesive and lap shear joints. Polym. Test. 2022, 113, 107680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. ASTM D3039/D3039M-17; 2017 Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2017.
  29. Hallad, S.A.; Banapurmath, N.R.; Patil, V.; Ajarekar, V.S.; Patil, A.; Godi, M.T.; Shettar, A.S. Graphene Reinforced Natural Fiber Nanocomposites for Structural Applications. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 376, 012072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Barros, F.A.; Gamboa, J.M.; Díaz-Ramírez, D.A.; González-Estrada, O.A.; Cruz, R.A. Numerical and experimental study of flexural behaviour in polymer composite materials reinforced with natural fique textiles. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2019, 1247, 012001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Patil, A.Y.; Banapurmath, N.R.; Sumukh, E.P.; Chitawadagi, M.V.; Khan, T.Y.; Badruddin, I.A.; Kamangar, S. Multi-Scale Study on Mechanical Property and Strength of New Green Sand (Poly Lactic Acid) as Replacement of Fine Aggregate in Concrete Mix. Symmetry 2020, 12, 1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dhaduti, S.; Ganachari, S.R.; Patil, A.Y. Prediction of injection molding parameters for symmetric spur gear. J. Mol. Model. 2020, 26, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Patil, A.Y.; Banapurmath, N.R.; Shivangi, S.U. Feasibility study of epoxy coated Poly Lactic Acid as a sustainable replacement for River sand. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 267, 121750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Patil, A.Y.; Banapurmath, N.R.; Sunal, S. Review on period of biodegradability for natural fibers embedded in Poly Lactic Acid as a bio-composites. In Biodegradation Pollutants and Bioremediation Principles; Patil, A.Y., Banapurmath, N.R., Sunal, S., Eds.; Taylor and Francis Publication: Abingdon, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  35. Kohli, A.; Ishwar, S.; Charan, M.J.; Adarsha, C.M.; Patil, A.Y.; Kotturshettar, B.B. Design and Simulation study of pineapple leaf reinforced fiber glass as an alternative material for prosthetic limb. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 872, 012118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yashasvi, D.N.; Badkar, J.; Kalburgi, J.; Koppalkar, K.; Purohit, K.; Patil, A.Y.; Fattepur, G.; Kotturshettar, B.B. Simulation study on mechanical properties of a sustainable alternative material for electric cable cover. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 872, 012016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kandekar, P.; Acharaya, A.; Chatta, A.; Kamat, A.; Patil, A.Y.; Shettar, A.S. A feasibility study of plastic as an alternative to air package in performance vehicle. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 872, 012076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Patil, A.Y.; Banapurmath, N.R.; Yaradoddi, J.S.; Kotturshettar, B.B.; Shettar, A.S.; Basavaraj, G.D.; Keshavamurthy, R.; Khan, T.M.Y.; Mathd, S. Experimental and simulation studies on waste vegetable peels as bio-composite fillers for light duty applications. Arab. J. Eng. Sci. 2019, 44, 7895–7907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yavagal, P.S.; Kulkarni, P.A.; Patil, N.M.; Salimath, N.S.; Patil, A.Y.; Savadi, R.S.; Kotturshettar, B.B. Cleaner production of edible straw as replacement for thermoset plastic. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 32, 492–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Totla, S.K.; Pillai, A.M.; Chetan, M.; Warad, C.; Patil, A.Y.; Kotturshettar, B.B. Analysis of Helmet with Coconut Shell as the Outer Layer. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 32, 365–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Patil, A.Y.; Banapurmath, N.R.; Kotturshettar, B.B.; Lekha, K.; Roseline, M. Limpet teeth-based polymer nanocomposite: A novel alternative biomaterial for denture base application. In Fiber-Reinforced Nanocomposites: Fundamentals and Applications; Han, B., Nguyen, T.A., Subrahmanya Bhat, K., Sharma, S., Longbiao, L., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhan, M.; Liu, Y.; Yang, H. A 3D rigid-viscoelastic FEM simulation of compressor blade isothermal forging. J. Mater. Processing Technol. 2001, 117, 56–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Batailly, A.; Agrapart, Q.; Millecamps, A.; Brunel, J. Experimental and numerical simulation of a rotor/stator interaction event localised on a single blade within an industrial high-pressure compressor. J. Sound Vib. 2016, 375, 308–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Li, Q.; Piechna, J.; Müeller, N. Simulation of fatigue failure in composite axial compressor blades. Mater. Des. 2011, 32, 2058–2065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 15 05397 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) Aluminium mould of 230 mm × 164 mm × 6 mm size, (b) Epoxy composite plate (0.2 wt % GNP and h-BN).
Figure 1. (a) Aluminium mould of 230 mm × 164 mm × 6 mm size, (b) Epoxy composite plate (0.2 wt % GNP and h-BN).
Materials 15 05397 g001
Materials 15 05397 g002 550
Figure 2. Samples vs. ultimate load of tensile test for composite with GNP and samples vs. ultimate load of tensile test for composite with GNP + h-BN.
Figure 2. Samples vs. ultimate load of tensile test for composite with GNP and samples vs. ultimate load of tensile test for composite with GNP + h-BN.
Materials 15 05397 g002
Materials 15 05397 g003 550
Figure 3. Maximum flexural stress of 3-point bending test.
Figure 3. Maximum flexural stress of 3-point bending test.
Materials 15 05397 g003
Materials 15 05397 g004 550
Figure 4. Maximum flexural stress of 4-point bending test.
Figure 4. Maximum flexural stress of 4-point bending test.
Materials 15 05397 g004
Materials 15 05397 g005a 550Materials 15 05397 g005b 550
Figure 5. (a) TGA test results of nanocomposites reinforced with GNP and (b) TGA test results of nanocomposites reinforced with GNP and h-BN.
Figure 5. (a) TGA test results of nanocomposites reinforced with GNP and (b) TGA test results of nanocomposites reinforced with GNP and h-BN.
Materials 15 05397 g005aMaterials 15 05397 g005b
Materials 15 05397 g006 550
Figure 6. TGA test results of nanocomposites reinforced with optimised wt % of GNP and GH.
Figure 6. TGA test results of nanocomposites reinforced with optimised wt % of GNP and GH.
Materials 15 05397 g006
Materials 15 05397 g007a 550Materials 15 05397 g007b 550
Figure 7. (a) FTIR result of the nanocomposite reinforced with GNP (0.2 wt %). (b) FTIR result of the composite reinforced with GNP and h-BN (0.6 wt %).
Figure 7. (a) FTIR result of the nanocomposite reinforced with GNP (0.2 wt %). (b) FTIR result of the composite reinforced with GNP and h-BN (0.6 wt %).
Materials 15 05397 g007aMaterials 15 05397 g007b
Materials 15 05397 g008 550
Figure 8. Patterns of nanocomposites with different reinforcement (a) 0.1 wt % (b) 0.2 wt % of GNP.
Figure 8. Patterns of nanocomposites with different reinforcement (a) 0.1 wt % (b) 0.2 wt % of GNP.
Materials 15 05397 g008
Materials 15 05397 g009 550
Figure 9. Patterns of nanocomposites with different reinforcement (a) 0.5 wt % (b) 0.6 wt % of GNP and h-BN.
Figure 9. Patterns of nanocomposites with different reinforcement (a) 0.5 wt % (b) 0.6 wt % of GNP and h-BN.
Materials 15 05397 g009
Materials 15 05397 g010 550
Figure 10. Process map for simulation vs. experimental work.
Figure 10. Process map for simulation vs. experimental work.
Materials 15 05397 g010
Materials 15 05397 g011 550
Figure 11. Epoxy and h-Boron Nitride/Graphene.
Figure 11. Epoxy and h-Boron Nitride/Graphene.
Materials 15 05397 g011
Materials 15 05397 g012 550
Figure 12. Contact generation.
Figure 12. Contact generation.
Materials 15 05397 g012
Materials 15 05397 g013 550
Figure 13. Mapped face meshing.
Figure 13. Mapped face meshing.
Materials 15 05397 g013
Materials 15 05397 g014 550
Figure 14. Mapped face meshing.
Figure 14. Mapped face meshing.
Materials 15 05397 g014
Materials 15 05397 g015 550
Figure 15. Total Deformation.
Figure 15. Total Deformation.
Materials 15 05397 g015
Materials 15 05397 g016a 550Materials 15 05397 g016b 550
Figure 16. Compressor blade (a) Geometry, (b) Contact generation, (c) Mesh generation, (d) Loads and boundary conditions, (e) Temperature gradient for h-BN coating, (f) Heat flux, (g) Thermal error, (h) Temperature gradient for graphene coating, (i) Heat flux, (j) Thermal error.
Figure 16. Compressor blade (a) Geometry, (b) Contact generation, (c) Mesh generation, (d) Loads and boundary conditions, (e) Temperature gradient for h-BN coating, (f) Heat flux, (g) Thermal error, (h) Temperature gradient for graphene coating, (i) Heat flux, (j) Thermal error.
Materials 15 05397 g016aMaterials 15 05397 g016b
Table
Table 1. Properties of the GNP and h-BN used in this study.
Table 1. Properties of the GNP and h-BN used in this study.
SpecificationsDimensions (GNP)Dimensions (h-BN)
Diameter2–4 (nm)60 (nm)
Purity99.5 (%)99.9 (%)
Density2.3 (g/cm3)2.29 (g/cm3)
Molecular Weight12.01 (g/mol)24.82 (g/mol)
Young’s Modulus1 (TPa)3.5 (TPa)
Melting Point>3600 (°C)2527 (°C)
Table
Table 2. Test specimen details (Epoxy + GNP).
Table 2. Test specimen details (Epoxy + GNP).
No.Specimen
Reference		ElementsPercentage of
GNPs by wt
1PEPlain epoxy0.0
2GNP1Plain epoxy + GNPs0.1
3GNP2Plain epoxy + GNPs0.2
4GNP3Plain epoxy + GNPs0.3
5GNP4Plain epoxy + GNPs0.4
6GNP5Plain epoxy + GNPs0.5
7GNP6Plain epoxy + GNPs0.6
Table
Table 3. Test specimen details (GNP and h-BN).
Table 3. Test specimen details (GNP and h-BN).
Sample No.Specimen
Reference		ConstituentsPercentage of
GNP and h-BNs by wt
1PEPlain epoxy0.0
2GH1Plain epoxy + GNPs + h-BN0.1
3GH2Plain epoxy + GNPs+ h-BN0.2
4GH3Plain epoxy + GNPs+ h-BN0.3
5GH4Plain epoxy + GNPs+ h-BN0.4
6GH5Plain epoxy + GNPs + h-BN0.5
7GH6Plain epoxy + GNPs+ h-BN0.6
Table
Table 4. Sample Characteristics (Tensile).
Table 4. Sample Characteristics (Tensile).
No.ParametersDetails
1.Number of samples tested per combination04
2.Specimen size165 mm × 19 mm × 6 mm
3.Epoxy resinsL-12
4.% of GNP/h-BN0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5 and 0.6% by weight of epoxy resin
Table
Table 5. Sample Characteristics (Flexural Test).
Table 5. Sample Characteristics (Flexural Test).
No.ParametersDetails
1.Number of samples tested per combination04
2.Specimen size135 mm × 15 mm × 6 mm
3.Epoxy resinL-12
4.% of GNP/h-BN0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5 and 0.6% by weight of Epoxy resin.
Table
Table 6. Sample Characteristics (Four-Point Bending).
Table 6. Sample Characteristics (Four-Point Bending).
No.ParametersDetails
1.Number of samples tested per combination04
2.Specimen size230 mm × 13 mm × 6 mm
3.Epoxy resinL-12
4.% of GNP/h-BN0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5 and 0.6% by weight of epoxy resin
Table
Table 7. Specification of SEM.
Table 7. Specification of SEM.
ParametersDetails
Instrument make
Resolution		JEOL JSM-63OLA
4 nm
Electron gunTungsten filament
Table
Table 8. Specification of EDX attachment.
Table 8. Specification of EDX attachment.
ParametersDetails
Instrument make
Acc. voltage		6380(LA)
20.0 kV
Probe current1.00000 nA
Table
Table 9. Different species present in 0.4 wt % of h-BN in epoxy.
Table 9. Different species present in 0.4 wt % of h-BN in epoxy.
ElementWeight %
B4.20
N8.44
C68.32
O18.62
Table
Table 10. Different species present in 0.6 wt % of GNP and h-BN in epoxy.
Table 10. Different species present in 0.6 wt % of GNP and h-BN in epoxy.
ElementWeight %
B4.89
N15.09
C47.52
O32.50
Table
Table 11. Material properties for h-BN and GNP.
Table 11. Material properties for h-BN and GNP.
Sl. No.MaterialYoung’s Modulus,
MPa		Poisson’s RatioDensity
(kg/m3)
1Epoxy resin130 × 1030.331400
2h-BN16 × 1030.242100
3GNP 1 × 1060.32300
Table
Table 12. Comparative study.
Table 12. Comparative study.
DescriptionExperimental MethodSimulation Method% of Error
Total deformation
(in mm)		2.22.5616.36
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Choukimath, M.C.; Banapurmath, N.R.; Riaz, F.; Patil, A.Y.; Jalawadi, A.R.; Mujtaba, M.A.; Shahapurkar, K.; Khan, T.M.Y.; Alsehli, M.; Soudagar, M.E.M.; et al. Experimental and Computational Study of Mechanical and Thermal Characteristics of h-BN and GNP Infused Polymer Composites for Elevated Temperature Applications. Materials 2022, 15, 5397. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15155397

AMA Style

Choukimath MC, Banapurmath NR, Riaz F, Patil AY, Jalawadi AR, Mujtaba MA, Shahapurkar K, Khan TMY, Alsehli M, Soudagar MEM, et al. Experimental and Computational Study of Mechanical and Thermal Characteristics of h-BN and GNP Infused Polymer Composites for Elevated Temperature Applications. Materials. 2022; 15(15):5397. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15155397

Chicago/Turabian Style

Choukimath, Mantesh C., Nagaraj R. Banapurmath, Fahid Riaz, Arun Y. Patil, Arun R. Jalawadi, M. A. Mujtaba, Kiran Shahapurkar, T. M. Yunus Khan, Mishal Alsehli, Manzoore Elahi M. Soudagar, and et al. 2022. "Experimental and Computational Study of Mechanical and Thermal Characteristics of h-BN and GNP Infused Polymer Composites for Elevated Temperature Applications" Materials 15, no. 15: 5397. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15155397

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop