Next Article in Journal
Improving Weak Subgrade Soil Using Different Additives
Next Article in Special Issue
Influence Factors in the Wide Application of Alkali-Activated Materials: A Critical Review about Efflorescence
Previous Article in Journal
Fatigue Cracking Evolution and Model of Cold Recycled Asphalt Mixtures during Different Curing Times
Previous Article in Special Issue
Optimizing the L/S Ratio in Geopolymers for the Production of Large-Size Elements with 3D Printing Technology
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 15
Issue 13
10.3390/ma15134475
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mechanical Strength and Chloride Ions’ Penetration of Alkali-Activated Concretes (AAC) with Blended Precursor

by
Patrycja Duży
1,2,*,
Marta Choinska
2,
Izabela Hager
1,
Ouali Amiri
2 and
Jérôme Claverie
2
1
Chair of Building Materials Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, 31-155 Cracow, Poland
2
Research Institute in Civil and Mechanical Engineering GeM—UMR CNRS 6183, IUT Saint-Nazaire, Nantes University, 44600 Saint-Nazaire, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(13), 4475; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15134475
Submission received: 7 May 2022 / Revised: 9 June 2022 / Accepted: 20 June 2022 / Published: 24 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Geopolymers and Alkali-Activated Materials: Synthesis, Characterization, and Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The purpose of this study was to investigate the properties of hardened alkali-activated concrete, which is considered an eco-friendly alternative to Portland cement concrete. In this paper, the precursors for alkali-activated concrete preparations are blends of fly ash and ground-granulated blast-furnace slag in three slag proportions: 5%, 20%, and 35%, expressed as a percentage of fly ash mass. Thus, three concretes were designed and cast, denominated as AAC5, AAC20, and AAC35. Their physical and mechanical characteristics were investigated at 28 and 180 days, as well as their properties of chloride ion transport. The modified NT BUILD 492 migration test was applied to determine the chloride ions’ penetration of the alkali-activated concretes. Improvement of mechanical strength and resistance to chloride aggression was observed with ground-granulated blast-furnace slag content increase in the compositions of the tested concretes. Mercury intrusion porosimetry tests provided insight into the open pore structures of concretes. A significant decrease in the total pore volume of the concrete and a change in the nature of the pore diameter distribution due to the addition of ground granulated blast furnace slag were demonstrated.

1. Introduction

Cement production alone contributes between 5% to 7% of anthropogenic CO2 emissions worldwide [1]. Alkali-activated concrete (AAC) is an environment-friendly material and is presently accepted as an alternative to conventional concrete [2]. AAC utilizes industrial by-products to reduce CO2 emissions associated with cement production. Despite having been investigated for decades, the application of alkali-activated materials in construction is still very limited [3]. One major reason behind this slow and often underappreciated acceptance of AAC in industries is that there are limited reports related to AAC itself [4]. The work on material that can replace the Portland cement in recent decades has become the target of numerous studies. Due to successive regulations limiting carbon dioxide emissions [5], the intensification of research in this area has resulted in a growing base of theoretical [6] and practical [7,8,9,10] knowledge about alkali-activated binders. As presented by Mendes et al. [11], most of the research data refer to the properties, performances, and durability of alkali-activated pastes and mortars [12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. Alkali-activated concretes are well-accepted in the research community owing to their comparable or even better performances as cement substitutes [19]. However, there is a need for complementary studies with a view to future standardization for the aforementioned concretes.
AAC’s binders are based on aluminosilicate precursors activated by alkaline solution [6]. The most common sources of aluminosilicate mentioned in the literature are fly ash (FA), slag, kaolinite, mining wastes, etc., [20]. In the case of the activator, hydroxides and silicates of alkali metals (mainly sodium or potassium) are used [21,22]. Numerous factors determine the properties of the hardened binder and AAC including liquid/solid ratio, precursor composition [15], activator nature [23], fineness, and degree of crystallinity of precursor [24]. Curing conditions also have a major influence on the final material. Alkali-activated fly ashes need heat curing [25], which is a disadvantage for an eco-friendly approach. In the case of alkali-activated slag, curing at ambient temperature can be applied. However, the short setting time and poor workability of these mixes limit the proper process of casting [26,27]. The use of blended precursor may resolve the problem of curing, which is due to slower reactivity at ambient conditions of alkali-activated blended binders with a lower slag content [28,29]. This optimizes the setting time and the workability of the mixture without additional temperature curing [30]. This approach is increasingly recognized among researchers [3,9] and will be discussed in this paper.
The growing interest in this material has also brought many challenges for researchers. The implementation of the use of AAC requires the determination of a number of its properties, such as for cement concrete. For both Portland cement concrete and AAC, their most important characteristic is compressive strength. However, the influence of the environment on the durability of constructions forces us to define the resistivity of applied materials to aggressive environmental factors. Chloride ions e.g., from seawater or de-icing salts, are considered one of the most dangerous environmental factors for reinforced concrete constructions [31,32] due to corrosion of steel bars. Owing to the lack of testing standards dedicated to AAC, current tests of chloride ion penetration are performed according to the standards for Portland cement concretes. However, their results provide conflicting results. Using the methodology described by ASTM C1556 [33], Kupwade-Patil and Allouche [34] reported that fly-ash-based AAC has better resistance to chloride ion aggression than cement concrete. However, with the use of the same method, Babae and Castel [35] observed a similar performance for AAC based on FA to Portland cement concrete with the evaluation of their electrochemical performances. On the other hand, Olivia and Nikraz [36], in their research based on NT Build 443 [37], presented that FA-based AAC displayed higher values of chloride diffusion coefficient compared to concrete with a cementitious binder. Fan et al. [38] noted that slag addition in alkali-activated binder reduces chloride penetration into AAC. This has also been observed by Chen et al. [39]. The examples of the studies indicate the need for further study of the topic. In case of rapid chloride penetration tests, the result’s discrepancy can be multiplied because of additional conditions during the test e.g., electric voltage being applied [40,41]. Ideas for adapting cement concrete standards for AAC are also emerging. Noushini and Castel [42] proposed a reduction in electric voltage, supporting the idea with research on the electrochemical performance of AAC. The necessity of modifications was also observed by Aiken et al. [43].
The research presented in this paper covers the analysis of the influence of the composition of the precursor used on the strength properties of AAC and the penetration of chloride ions into the material. The tested blends of fly ash and ground granulated blast-furnace slag in three slag proportions, 5%, 20%, and 35%, expressed as a percentage of fly ash mass, and were denominated as AAC5, AAC20, and AAC35, respectively. Due to slag addition, the provided AACs could be cured in ambient conditions, without any heating input. This study refers also to the modification of the chloride ion penetration measurement technique, which is the novelty of this study. The tests presented in this work were carried out 28 and 180 days after the preparation of the samples, which made it possible to consider the influence of aging on the properties of materials. The interpretation of the obtained results was enriched with the analysis of mercury intrusion porosity (MIP) results, which allowed for drawing reliable conclusions.

2. Materials and Methods

The studies were performed on alkali-activated concretes in which FA (Połaniec power plant, Poland) and ground-granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBFS) (Ekocem, Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland) blends were used as precursors. The oxide compositions of both precursors FA and GGBFS used in this research are provided below (Table 1).
The review of oxide compositions of the precursors published by Osio-Norgaard, Gevaudan, and Srubar [44] shows that, in terms of oxide composition, FA and GGBFS used in this study are similar to the precursors described in the above-mentioned data compilation on ashes and slags. The solution used as an activator for the AA binder preparation was an aqueous solution of sodium silicate Geosil® 34417 with an additional amount of water added. The chemical composition of this solution is presented in Table 2.
The blends of precursors were prepared by the substitution of FA with GGBFS in the following proportions, 5%, 20%, and 35%, expressed as a percentage of FA mass. Referring to the precursor compositions, three concretes were prepared denominated as AAC5, AAC20, and AAC35, respectively.
Design assumptions of the mixtures were based on previous experience of the research team with works on alkali-activated mortars [8,9] and examples available in the literature [42]. The trial batches with blended FA/GGBFS binders (0–40%) were prepared. For each trial material, the workability of the mixture, compressive strength, and chloride ion penetration after 28 days were tested. The optimal FA/GGBFS ratios for final research were chosen based on the obtained results. The trial batches of concretes enabled the establishment of the optimal mixing time, which was 5 min for already-prepared ingredients, as well as the alkali-activated paste content. This experimental approach enabled the adjustment of the amount of paste in concrete at a level of 300 dm3/m3.
For each of the designed recipes (presented in Table 3), the following characteristics were kept constant: water/binder (w/b) ratio = 0.37; alkaline solution/binder ratio = 0.53; and the amount of paste in concrete = 300 dm3/m3. Water is the total mass of water added (water added and water contained in Geosil® 34417); binder is a sum of dry components of the precursor FA and GGBFS (by mass); and alkaline solution is the mass of diluted with water Geosil® 34417.
The coarse aggregates were basalt grains composed to form within the range of the grading curve for the concretes (Figure 1).
Basalt aggregate is a crushed igneous rock with an apparent particle density of 3.17 g/cm3 according to EN 1097-6:2013-11 [45], meeting the requirements of the PN-EN 12620+A1:2010 [46] standard. Quartz sand conforming to EN 206+A2:2021-08 [47] was used. The samples were kept in molds under a plastic cover for one day. After that, they were removed and stored in laboratory conditions (18 ± 2 °C; HR = 75%), covered by plastic foil to avoid water evaporation.
The mechanical properties of the hardened AACs were tested on 3 specimens of each material at 28 and 180 days to monitor their evolution over time. Compressive and tensile splitting strength tests were performed according to current standards PN-EN 12390-3 [48], PN-EN 12390-6: 2011 [49], and EN 206+A2:2021-08 [47]. The tests were carried out on cubic samples whose dimensions of the sides were 100 mm.
The most reliable test to determine the resistance to penetration of chlorides is the bulk diffusion test (ASTM C1556-11a [33]). The direct result of this time-consuming measurement is the apparent chloride diffusion coefficient. However, other standards exist that allow a more rapid evaluation of the impact of chloride aggression on concrete. Relations between coefficients obtained by different test methods have been analyzed and presented by Wang and Liu [50].
To test the chloride ion penetration of alkali-activated materials, the NT BUILD 492 method [40,51,52] was selected in this study. The significant advantage of this method is the relatively short duration of the measurement. Due to the application of an electric potential, the ion movement across the saturated sample is accelerated. The specimens were initially vacuum saturated with distilled water. In accordance with the recommendations for AAC tests [42], the test procedure was modified using a reduced electric voltage (10 V instead of 60 V). The NT BUILD 492 scheme is presented in Figure 2a. The average chloride penetration depth was determined by silver nitrate solution, as presented in Figure 2b.
Measurements of the chloride ion diffusion coefficient were carried out on samples of 11 cm in diameter and 5 cm in height after 28 and 180 days of maturation to investigate the coefficient changes over time. For each of the materials, chloride penetration depths were measured on 4 splits of the samples. The results obtained were compared with available data [10] to confirm the consistency of the results obtained with other materials with the same type of blended precursors.
It is well known that porosity, pore size distribution, and tortuosity strongly affect mechanical properties and chloride transport in hardened concretes [31,53,54]. Each material was also subjected to a porosity analysis using mercury porosimetry using Poromaster Micromeritics AutoPore IV. For each type of concrete, a sample of size approx. 1 cm3 was cut from the cylinder sample, and its total porosity and pore size distribution were determined. Depending on the pressure and amount of mercury injected, the pore diameters and their contents in AACs were specified.

3. Results and Discussion

The apparent density at ambient conditions (temp. 20 ± 2 °C) was measured for 20 specimens of each material. The apparent densities of the tested materials after 180 days were: 2.25 g/cm3, 2.30 g/cm3, and 2.38 g/cm3 for AAC5, AAC20, and AAC35, respectively. The standard deviation was less than 0.05 for each AAC. An example of the test specimen is presented in Figure 3.

3.1. Mechanical Characteristics

The results of compressive and splitting tensile strength tests of three concretes are presented in Figure 4a,b.
The results of the compressive and tensile strength tests show that the substitution of FA by GGBFS positively influenced the mechanical properties of AACs. The test results indicate an almost linear relationship between GGBFS content and compressive and splitting tensile strength at 28 days, and in particular, a near double increase between AAC5 (23.7 MPa) and AAC20 (44.8 MPa) and an almost triple increase between AAC5 and AAC35 (68.8 MPa). The GGBFS impacts the microstructure by reducing the porosity (see Section 3.3) and therefore improves the mechanical performance.
The obtained values are generally comparable to results observed in the literature for the AACs with similar compositions [43]. Even for materials with the lowest GGBFS content (5%), the obtained value of compressive strength (23.7 MPa) presents the same order of magnitude as fly-ash-based AACs (100% FA) cured at 70 °C (16 MPa) [43]. It was noted that the mechanical strength of the studied concretes can be slightly higher than for mortars with the same amounts of FA and GGBFS [30,55].
Values obtained at 180 days are also in correlation with the increase in GGBFS content. The impact of aging is positive for all the tested concretes, but especially for AAC5 with the lowest GGBFS content: 23.7 MPa at 28 days and 43.2 MPa at 180 days for compressive strength, and 3.25 MPa at 28 days and 5.11 MPa at 180 days for splitting tensile strength. The reason for the reported phenomena is the low reactivity of alkali-activated fly ash [29] and the high reactivity of GGBFS containing calcium, which is responsible for quick early strength development [26].

3.2. Chloride Ion Penetration and Diffusion Coefficient

After the chloride ion penetration tests were performed, the samples were split and sprayed with silver nitrate AgNO3 solution. The examples of the cross-sections of the samples showing the penetration profile are presented in Figure 5 and Figure 6.
The average values and standard deviations of chloride penetration depth for each sample are presented in Table 4. The results of chloride transport in AACs indicate a strong correlation with GGBFS content: the chloride penetration depth for AAC5 is almost twice that of AAC20, which is more than quadruple that of AAC35. Slag’s impact is therefore clearly pointed out.
The values of the non-steady-state apparent chloride migration coefficients were calculated with the formula 1 [56,57] and are depicted in Figure 7 and Figure 8. The thickness of each specimen was about 50 mm; nevertheless, it was measured precisely for each cylinder. The solution temperature was 20 °C, and the value of applied voltage was 10 V, as already mentioned in the previous section.
D n s s m = R · T Z · F · e Δ E · x d − α x d Δ t
where:
α = 2 · R · T Z · F · e Δ E · e r f − 1 ( 1 − 2 c d c 0 )
  • Dnssm: non-steady state migration coefficient, m2/s;
  • Z: absolute value of ion valence, for chloride, z = 1;
  • F: Faraday constant, F = 9.648 × 104 J/(V‧mol);
  • ΔE: value of applied voltage, V;
  • R: gas constant, R = 8.314 J/(K‧mol);
  • T: average value of the initial and final temperatures in the anolyte solution, K;
  • e: thickness of the specimen, m;
  • xd: average value of the penetration depths, m;
  • Δt: test duration, seconds;
  • erf−1: inverse of error function;
  • cd: chloride concretion at which the colour changes, cd ≈ 0.07 for OPC concrete;
  • c0: chloride concentration in the catholyte solution, N.
Materials 15 04475 g007 550
Figure 7. AACs’ chloride diffusion coefficient values vs. GGBFS content.
Figure 7. AACs’ chloride diffusion coefficient values vs. GGBFS content.
Materials 15 04475 g007
Materials 15 04475 g008 550
Figure 8. AACs’ chloride diffusion coefficient values vs. fc.
Figure 8. AACs’ chloride diffusion coefficient values vs. fc.
Materials 15 04475 g008
In the case of the chloride ion penetration coefficient, a strong linear relationship with the material composition was observed, independently of the material’s aging (Figure 7). In parallel, a linear relationship was highlighted between the chloride coefficient and compressive strength (Figure 8). Both relationships should be due to the effect of the porosity decreasing within slag addition [58], which is discussed in the next section. The modification of the test method enables the comparison of results obtained for geopolymer concrete with reference methods dedicated to Portland cement concrete [33,41,42]. The values of chloride diffusion coefficient after 28 days of curing in ambient conditions show the positive influence of GGBFS content increase: 86.6 × 10−12 m2/s (σ = 3.8), 47.8 × 10−12 m2/s (σ = 6.8), and 9.4 × 10−12 m2/s (σ = 4.6) for AAC5, AAC20, and AAC35, respectively. The results obtained for AAC20 and AAC35 were partially comparable to values available in the literature for AAC with close precursors’ compositions [43] and tested by NT Build 492 without modifications. However, the applied modifications [42] made it possible to carry out the test on the AACs with low slag content with satisfying repeatability in contrast to the inconsistency of results available in the literature [34,35,36,55].
Noushini A. [42] defined the superior limit value of the chloride diffusion coefficient for AACs applied in chloride environments equal to 14 × 10−12 m2/s. This recommendation was based on experimental results according to the standard ASTM C1556 [33]. Values of diffusion coefficient for AAC35, almost regardless of the time seem to be promising even with such strong constraints. However, the rapid test methodology adjusted to AACs requires verification. Indeed, the results obtained are essential to determine the impact of the precursor composition and the material’s age on the resistance to chloride aggression. The transfer of chloride ions in AACs takes place via the pore network of materials. As mentioned before, the low reactivity of FA causes long-term development of AAC’s properties, even for resistance to chloride aggression.

3.3. MIP Porosity

In the case of porous materials such as cement concrete and AAC, their characteristics are strongly dependent on their open porosity. In order to investigate the total volume of pores and their size distribution, Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry tests were undertaken. The results for three AACs are presented in Figure 9 and Figure 10.
MIP tests were conducted after 180 days of the curing process in ambient conditions (20 ± 2 °C). In terms of total pore content of materials, increasing the level of substitution of FA by GGBFS reduces porosity by almost half: AAC5, AAC20, and AAC35 total porosities are 14.28%, 9.18%, and 7.30%, respectively. A strong association between the results and the precursors’ compositions were reported. The reason for this phenomenon is a difference in hydration products formed through the activation of FA and GGBFS [30]. Due to the high calcium content of GGBFS, the main reaction product of the alkali activation process is C-A-S-H gel, which results in a denser matrix [59]. An increase in slag content in the precursor’s composition results in a reduced ratio of geopolymeric gel (N-A-S-H), generated by the alkali activation of FA, to C-A-S-H gel, which leads to a more homogenous and compact structure [28].
The pore size distribution presented in Figure 10 shows the diversity of the internal structure of the concretes. A distinct difference was observed between AAC5 and other materials. The porosity of AAC5 is dominated by 0.04 µm diameter pores, while AAC20 and AAC35 present uniform and continuous pore diameter distributions. Slight peaks of pores of 0.15 µm diameter for AAC20 were noticed as well as 0.09 µm and 1.32 µm for AAC35. However, AAC20 and AAC35 seem to have similar inner structures. The same tendencies were observed for the microstructure of corresponding materials (mortars) and are discussed in the available literature [60].
Certainly, the variable content of GGBFS in precursor compositions triggered changes in the structure’s development process. Except for the slag addition, the AACs’ components were identical, as well as the hardening and storage conditions. Therefore, the results presented in this paper are closely related to the precursor used. Increasing slag content affected the inner structure of material, but changes are much more significant for AAC5 than AAC20. However, other analysed characteristics were affected with a linear trend.
The results presented in this paper show a strong influence of blended precursor composition on the properties of AAC without temperature curing. Taking into consideration ingredients used for the preparation of concretes, it can be assumed that all of the phenomena were caused by a change in FA/GGBFS ratio, resulting finally in concrete porosity change. Geopolymer gel N-A-S-H, formed from the activation of FA, was gradually replaced by C-A-S-H (from alkali activation of GGBFS), which densified the inner structure of materials by affecting the mechanical strength and chloride aggression resistance. The obtained results show almost linear correlations between mechanical strength and chloride ion penetration of AAC; however, it should be noted that there is still a lack of testing procedures dedicated to alkali-activated concrete. The modification of chloride ion penetration measurement [42] applied for the conducted tests shows the necessity of constant development and is an area of the authors’ further research.

4. Conclusions

The conducted research indicates a significant influence of GGBFS addition on the mechanical properties and resistance to chloride aggression of AAC, taking into account the impact of aging of materials. The results of the tests carried out show that it is possible to obtain satisfactory properties for AAC without the need for temperature curing the material. The conducted research allows for drawing general conclusions:
  • The addition of GGBFS significantly reduces the porosity of alkali-activated concretes and changes the pore size distribution from one dominated by a specific pore diameter to continuous pore size distribution.
  • Increasing quasi-linear relationships between the GGBFS content in the material composition and the compressive strength, splitting tensile strength and the value of the chloride diffusion coefficient have been demonstrated.
  • The effect of aging on the improvement of material properties is particularly noticeable in the case of concretes with low GGBFS content.
The presented results indicate the necessity for further research aimed at a better understanding of the mechanism of chloride penetration in AAC and the influence of blast furnace slag addition on the physical and mechanical properties of alkali-activated concretes in view of their durability.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.H., M.C. and O.A.; methodology, M.C. and P.D.; validation, I.H. and O.A.; formal analysis, M.C., O.A. and J.C.; investigation, P.D.; data curation, P.D. and M.C.; writing—original draft preparation, P.D., I.H. and M.C.; writing—review and editing, I.H., M.C., O.A., P.D. and J.C.; visualization, P.D.; supervision, O.A.; project administration, I.H.; funding acquisition, I.H. and M.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors of this research were financially supported by the Polish National Agency for Academic Exchange (NAWA) under the EMMAT program: E-mobility and sustainable materials and technologies PPI/APM/2018/1/00027.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Meyer, C. The greening of the concrete industry. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2009, 31, 601–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. de Azevedo, A.R.G.; Cruz, A.S.A.; Marvila, M.T.; de Oliveira, L.B.; Monteiro, S.N.; Vieira, C.M.F.; Fediuk, R.; Timokhin, R.; Vatin, N.; Daironas, M. Natural Fibers as an Alternative to Synthetic Fibers in Reinforcement of Geopolymer Matrices: A Comparative Review. Polymers 2021, 13, 2493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Van Deventer, J.S.J.; Provis, J.L.; Duxson, P. Technical and commercial progress in the adoption of geopolymer cement. Miner. Eng. 2012, 29, 89–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Nawaz, M.; Heitor, A.; Sivakumar, M. Geopolymers in construction—Recent developments. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 260, 120472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. United Nations. Framework Convention on Climate Change Adoption of the Paris Agreement. In Proceedings of the 21st Conference of the Parties, Paris, France, 30 November–12 December 2015. [Google Scholar]
  6. Provis, J.L.; Van Deventer, J.S.J. Alkali Activated Materials, RILEM State Art Reports, RILEM TC 224-AAM; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2014; Volume 13. [Google Scholar]
  7. Law, D.W.; Adam, A.A.; Molyneaux, T.K.; Patnaikuni, I.; Wardhono, A. Long term durability properties of class F fly ash geopolymer concrete. Mater. Struct. 2014, 48, 721–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hager, I.; Sitarz, M.; Mróz, K. Fly-ash based geopolymer mortar for high-temperature application—Effect of slag addition. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 316, 128168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sitarz, M.; Hager, I.; Choińska, M. Evolution of Mechanical Properties with Time of Fly-Ash-Based Geopolymer Mortars under the Effect of Granulated Ground Blast Furnace Slag Addition. Energies 2020, 13, 1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Duży, P.; Sitarz, M.; Adamczyk, M.; Choińska, M.; Hager, I. Chloride Ions’ Penetration of Fly Ash and Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slags-Based Alkali-Activated Mortars. Materials 2021, 14, 6583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mendes, B.C.; Pedroti, L.G.; Vieira, C.M.F.; Marvila, M.; Azevedo, A.R.G.; de Carvalho, J.M.F.; Ribeiro, J.C.L. Application of eco-friendly alternative activators in alkali-activated materials: A review. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 35, 102010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kalombe, R.M.; Ojumu, V.T.; Eze, C.P.; Nyale, S.M.; Kevern, J.; Petrik, L.F. Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Building Materials for Green and Sustainable Development. Materials 2020, 13, 5699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yao, X.; Yang, T.; Zhang, Z. Compressive strength development and shrinkage of alkali-activated fly ash–slag blends associated with efflorescence. Mater. Struct. 2016, 49, 2907–2918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hu, X.; Shi, C.; Shi, Z.; Zhang, L. Compressive strength, pore structure and chloride transport properties of alkali-activated slag/fly ash mortars. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2019, 104, 103392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhu, H.; Zhang, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Tian, L. Durability of alkali-activated fly ash concrete: Chloride penetration in pastes and mortars. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 65, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chen, J.; Tian, C.; Wei, X. Experimental and simulation study on chloride permeability in cement paste. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 262, 120600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, Y.; Shui, Z.; Gao, X.; Huang, Y.; Yu, R.; Song, Q. Chloride binding capacity and phase modification of alumina compound blended cement paste under chloride attack. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2020, 108, 103537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chi, M.; Huang, R. Binding mechanism and properties of alkali-activated fly ash/slag mortars. Constr. Build. Mater. 2013, 40, 291–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Albitar, M.; Mohamed Ali, M.S.; Visintin, P.; Drechsler, M. Durability evaluation of geopolymer and conventional concretes. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 136, 374–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Singh, B.; Ishwarya, G.; Gupta, M.; Bhattacharyya, K.S. Geopolymer concrete: A review of some recent developments. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 85, 78–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Provis, J.L. Activating solution chemistry for geopolymers. In Geopolymers; Provis, J.L., van Deventer, J.S.J., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing Limited: Oxford, UK, 2019; pp. 50–71. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kaur, M.; Singh, J.; Kaur, M. Synthesis of fly ash based geopolymer mortar considering different concentrations and combinations of alkaline activator solution. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 1534–1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ke, X.; Bernal, S.A.; Hussein, O.H.; Provis, J.L. Chloride binding and mobility in sodium carbonate-activated slag pastes and mortars. Mater. Struct. 2017, 50, 252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Aughenbaugh, K.L.; Stutzman, P.; Juenger, M.C.G. Identifying Glass Compositions in Fly Ash. Front. Mater. 2016, 3, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Bakharev, T. Geopolymeric materials prepared using Class F fly ash and elevated temperature curing. Cem. Concr. Res. 2005, 35, 1224–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nath, P.; Sarker, P.K. Effect of GGBFS on setting, workability and early strength properties of fly ash geopolymer concrete cured in ambient condition. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 66, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Shi, C.; Qu, B.; Provis, J.L. Recent progress in low-carbon binders. Cem. Concr. Res. 2019, 122, 227–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Criado, M.; Palomo, A.; Fernández-Jiménez, A. Alkali activation of fly ashes. Part 1: Effect of curing conditions on the carbonation of the reaction products. Fuel 2005, 84, 2048–2054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Palomo, A.; Alonso, S.; Fernández-Jiménez, A.; Sobrados, I.; Sanz, J. Alkaline activation of fly ashes: NMR study of the reaction products. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2004, 87, 1141–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rafeet, A.M.; Vinai, R.; Soutsos, M.; Sha, W. Effects of slag substitution on physical and mechanical properties of fly ash-based alkali activated binders (AABs). Cem. Concr. Res. 2019, 122, 118–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hooton, R.D.; Thomas, M.D.A.; Standish, K. Prediction of Chloride Penetration in Concrete; Materials Science: Toronto, ON, Canada, 2001; Available online: https://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=690787 (accessed on 7 November 2017).
  32. Bernal, S.A.; Bílek, V.; Criado, M.; Fernández-Jiménez, A.; Kavalerova, E.; Krivenko, P.V.; Palacios, M.; Palomo, A.; Provis, J.L.; Puertas, F.; et al. Durability and testing—Degradation via mass transport. In RILEM State-of-the-Art Reports: Alkali Activated Materials; Provis, J.L., van Deventer, J.S.J., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands; Heidelberg, Germany; New York, NY, USA; London, UK, 2014; Volume 13, pp. 223–276. [Google Scholar]
  33. ASTM C1556-11a; Standard Test Method for Determining the Apparent Chloride Diffusion Coefficient of Cementitious Mixtures by Bulk Diffusion. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2016.
  34. Kupwade-Patil, K.; Allouche, E.N. Examination of Chloride-Induced Corrosion in Reinforced Geopolymer Concretes. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2013, 25, 1465–1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Babaee, M.; Castel, A. Chloride-induced corrosion of reinforcement in low-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Cem. Concr. Res. 2016, 88, 96–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Olivia, M.; Nikraz, H. Durability of fly ash geopolymer concrete in a seawater environment. In Proceedings of the Concrete 2011 Conference, Perth, Australia, 12 October 2011; The Concrete Institute of Australia: Perth, Australia, 2011; pp. 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  37. Nordtest NT BUILD 443; Concrete Hardened: Accelerated Chloride Penetration. NORDTEST: Espoo, Finland, 1995.
  38. Fan, J.; Zhu, H.; Shi, J.; Li, Z.; Yang, S. Influence of slag content on the bond strength, chloride penetration resistance, and interface phase evolution of concrete repaired with alkali activated slag/fly ash. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 263, 120639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chen, Y.; Ji, T.; Yang, Z.; Zhan, W.; Zhang, Y. Sustainable use of ferronickel slag in cementitious composites and the effect on chloride penetration resistance. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 240, 117969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Nordtest NT BUILD 492; Concrete, Mortar and Cement-Based Repair Materials: Chloride Migration Coefficient from Non-Steady State Migration Experiments. NORDTEST: Espoo, Finland, 1999.
  41. ASTM C1202-19; Standard Test Method for Electrical Indication of Concrete’s Ability to Resist Chloride Ion Penetration. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2019.
  42. Noushini, A.; Castel, A. Performance-based criteria to assess the suitability of geopolymer concrete in marine environments using modified ASTM C1202 and ASTM C1556 methods. Mater. Struct. 2018, 51, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Aiken, T.A.; Kwasny, J.; Sha, W.; Tong, K.T. Mechanical and durability properties of alkali-activated fly ash concrete with increasing slag content. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 301, 124330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Osio-Norgaard, J.; Gevaudan, J.P.; Srubar, W.V. A review of chloride transport in alkali-activated cement paste, mortar, and concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 186, 191–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. EN 1097-6:2013-11 Tests for Mechanical and Physical Properties of Aggregates—Part 6: Determination of Particle Density and Water Absorption. Available online: https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/cen/efd7df30-eac1-4445-90eb-9b2958fb2564/en-1097-6-2013 (accessed on 6 May 2022).
  46. EN 12620+A1:2010 Aggregates for Concrete. Available online: https://iss.rs/sr_Cyrl/project/show/iss:proj:26477 (accessed on 1 May 2022).
  47. EN 206+A2:2021-08 Concrete—Specification, Performance, Production and Conformity. Available online: https://www.en-standard.eu/bs-en-206-2013-a2-2021-concrete-specification-performance-production-and-conformity/ (accessed on 5 April 2022).
  48. EN 12390-3:2019 Testing Hardened Concrete—Part 3: Compressive Strength of Test Specimens. Available online: https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/cen/7eb738ef-44af-436c-ab8e-e6561571302c/en-12390-3-2019 (accessed on 20 April 2022).
  49. EN 12390-6:2011 Testing Hardened Concrete—Part 6: Tensile Splitting Strength of Test Specimens. Available online: https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/cen/81ec74fb-9338-4909-a200-6a5042160640/en-12390-6-2009 (accessed on 2 May 2022).
  50. Wang, J.; Liu, E. The relationship between steady-state chloride diffusion and migration coefficients in cementitious materials. Mag. Concr. Res. 2020, 72, 1016–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tang, L. Electrically accelerated methods for determining chloride diffusivity in concrete—Current development. Mag. Concr. Res. 1996, 48, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Tang, L.; Sørensen, H.E. Precision of the Nordic test methods for measuring the chloride diffusion/migration coefficients of concrete. Mater. Struct. Mater. Constr. 2001, 34, 479–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhang, X.; Long, K.; Liu, W.; Li, L.; Long, W.J. Carbonation and Chloride Ions’ Penetration of Alkali-Activated Materials: A Review. Molecules 2020, 25, 5074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Spragg, R.P.; Castro, J.; Li, W.; Pour-Ghaz, M.; Huang, P.-T.; Weiss, J. Wetting and drying of concrete using aqueous solutions containing deicing salts. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2011, 33, 535–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sitarz, M.; Urban, M.; Hager, I. Rheology and Mechanical Properties of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Mortars with Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag Addition. Energies 2020, 13, 2639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. French National Research Project PERFDUB Internal Report. Essai Accéléré de Migration non Stationnaire. Recommandations to the XP P18462 French Standard, Working Group GT1A. 2021. Available online: https://www.omnispace.fr/perfdub/ (accessed on 2 May 2022).
  57. EN 12390-18:2021-08 Testing Hardened Concrete—Part 18: Determination of the Chloride Migration Coefficient. Available online: https://genorma.com/en/project/show/cen:proj:63061 (accessed on 29 April 2022).
  58. Fu, Q.; Bu, M.; Zhang, Z.; Xu, W.; Yuan, Q.; Niu, D. Hydration Characteristics and Microstructure of Alkali-Activated Slag Concrete: A Review. Engineering 2021, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Runci, A.; Serdar, M. Effect of curing time on the chloride diffusion of alkali-activated slag. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2022, 16, e00927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Dudek, M.; Sitarz, M. Analysis of Changes in the Microstructure of Geopolymer Mortar after Exposure to High Temperatures. Materials 2020, 13, 4263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Materials 15 04475 g001 550
Figure 1. Particle size distribution of AACs.
Figure 1. Particle size distribution of AACs.
Materials 15 04475 g001
Materials 15 04475 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) NT BUILD 492 migration test scheme; (b) principle of chloride penetration depth measurement.
Figure 2. (a) NT BUILD 492 migration test scheme; (b) principle of chloride penetration depth measurement.
Materials 15 04475 g002
Materials 15 04475 g003 550
Figure 3. Cross-section of the concrete cylinder sample of 11 cm diameter and 5 cm height.
Figure 3. Cross-section of the concrete cylinder sample of 11 cm diameter and 5 cm height.
Materials 15 04475 g003
Materials 15 04475 g004 550
Figure 4. Mechanical properties of alkali-activated concretes after 28 and 180 days: (a) compressive strength (fc); (b) splitting tensile strength (ft).
Figure 4. Mechanical properties of alkali-activated concretes after 28 and 180 days: (a) compressive strength (fc); (b) splitting tensile strength (ft).
Materials 15 04475 g004
Materials 15 04475 g005 550
Figure 5. Chloride penetration depths of alkali-activated concretes after 28 days: (a) AAC5; (b) AAC20; (c) AAC35.
Figure 5. Chloride penetration depths of alkali-activated concretes after 28 days: (a) AAC5; (b) AAC20; (c) AAC35.
Materials 15 04475 g005
Materials 15 04475 g006 550
Figure 6. Chloride penetration depths of alkali-activated concretes after 180 days: (a) AAC5; (b) AAC20; (c) AAC35.
Figure 6. Chloride penetration depths of alkali-activated concretes after 180 days: (a) AAC5; (b) AAC20; (c) AAC35.
Materials 15 04475 g006
Materials 15 04475 g009 550
Figure 9. Total porosity of alkali-activated concretes.
Figure 9. Total porosity of alkali-activated concretes.
Materials 15 04475 g009
Materials 15 04475 g010 550
Figure 10. Pore size distribution of alkali-activated concretes.
Figure 10. Pore size distribution of alkali-activated concretes.
Materials 15 04475 g010
Table
Table 1. Chemical compositions of FA and GGBFS used in the presented research.
Table 1. Chemical compositions of FA and GGBFS used in the presented research.
wt.%SiO2Al2O3FexOyCaOMgOSO3K2ONa2OP2O5TiO2Mn3O4Cl−
FA52.3028.056.323.051.710.282.510.760.691.350.07-
GGBFS39.317.611.4943.904.150.510.360.47---0.04
Table
Table 2. Chemical composition of Geosil® 34417.
Table 2. Chemical composition of Geosil® 34417.
CharacteristicUnitWoellner Geosil® 34417
Na2O contentwt.%16.74
SiO2 contentwt.%27.5
Densityg/cm31.552
ViscositymPa×s470
Weight ratio (WR = wt.% SiO2/wt. Na2O)-1.64
Molar ratio (MR = mol SiO2/mol Na2O)-1.70
Table
Table 3. Composition of alkali-activated concretes [kg/m3].
Table 3. Composition of alkali-activated concretes [kg/m3].
AAC5BAAC20BAAC35B
FA336.9292.3244.1
GGBFS17.773.1131.4
Alkaline Solution + water189.4195.1200.5
Sand 0/2662.4662.4662.4
Basalt 2/8708.9708.9708.9
Basalt 8/16648.4648.4648.4
water/binder (w/b) ratio0.37
alkaline solution/binder ratio 0.53
amount of paste in concrete 300 dm3/m3
Table
Table 4. The average values and standard deviations of chloride penetration depth of AAC.
Table 4. The average values and standard deviations of chloride penetration depth of AAC.
AAC5AAC20AAC35
28 daysPenetration depth [mm]37.219.14.1
σ—standard deviation 1.82.31.5
180 daysPenetration depth [mm]28.818.37.2
σ—standard deviation2.31.31.3
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Duży, P.; Choinska, M.; Hager, I.; Amiri, O.; Claverie, J. Mechanical Strength and Chloride Ions’ Penetration of Alkali-Activated Concretes (AAC) with Blended Precursor. Materials 2022, 15, 4475. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15134475

AMA Style

Duży P, Choinska M, Hager I, Amiri O, Claverie J. Mechanical Strength and Chloride Ions’ Penetration of Alkali-Activated Concretes (AAC) with Blended Precursor. Materials. 2022; 15(13):4475. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15134475

Chicago/Turabian Style

Duży, Patrycja, Marta Choinska, Izabela Hager, Ouali Amiri, and Jérôme Claverie. 2022. "Mechanical Strength and Chloride Ions’ Penetration of Alkali-Activated Concretes (AAC) with Blended Precursor" Materials 15, no. 13: 4475. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15134475

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop