Next Article in Journal
Microstructural Evolution of a 3003 Based Aluminium Alloy during the CSET Process
Previous Article in Journal
Powder Metallurgical Processing and Characterization of Molybdenum Addition to Tungsten Heavy Alloys by Spark Plasma Sintering
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study of Pavement Micro- and Macro-Texture Evolution Due to Traffic Polishing Using 3D Areal Parameters

1
School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
2
School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA
3
Sichuan Communication Surveying & Design Institute Co., Ltd., Chengdu 610041, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2021, 14(19), 5769; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14195769
Submission received: 12 September 2021 / Revised: 17 September 2021 / Accepted: 30 September 2021 / Published: 2 October 2021

Abstract

:
Pavement micro- and macro-texture have significant effects on roadway friction and driving safety. The influence of traffic polish on pavement texture has been investigated in many laboratory studies. This paper conducts field evaluation of pavement micro- and macro-texture under actual traffic polishing using three-dimensional (3D) areal parameters. A portable high-resolution 3D laser scanner measured pavement texture from a field site in 2018, 2019, and 2020. Then, the 3D texture data was decomposed to micro- and macro-texture using Fourier transform and Butterworth filter methods. Twenty 3D areal parameters from five categories, including height, spatial, hybrid, function, and feature parameters, were calculated to characterize pavement micro- and macro-texture. The results demonstrate that the 3D areal parameters provide an alternative to comprehensively characterize the evolution of pavement texture under traffic polish from different aspects.

1. Introduction

1.1. Background

Pavement skid resistance has positive effects on reducing traffic accidents in dry or wet conditions [1]. For example, the skidding risk would increase rapidly when the pavement skid number (SN) from locked-wheel skid testers is below 50 and decrease significantly when the value of SN is over 65 [2]. Additionally, traffic accidents increased 60% when the value of SN decreased from 48 to 33 [3]. Therefore, it is critical to design pavements surface with high skid resistance and wear resistance to ensure driving safety during design life [4].
Skid resistance of pavement surface varies under traffic polishing throughout the design life: It typically increases to a peak at the initial stage and decreases continuously at the following stages of pavement life [5,6]. However, the level of skid resistance is dependent on the wear process of pavement surface texture [7], as the skid resistance of pavement comes directly from the contact between vehicle tires and pavement surface micro- and macro- texture [8]. Pavement surface texture is recognized as the dominating factor influencing pavement skid resistance [9].
Therefore, many studies have been performed to investigate how traffic wear affects pavement texture over time in order to evaluate pavement skid resistance under traffic polish. Pavement texture can be categorized into macro-texture (0.5 mm < wavelength < 50 mm) and micro-texture (wavelength < 0.5 mm) based on the wavelength of its components [10]. The pavement macro-texture provides drainage channels when it rains and comprises the hysteretic component of friction, while the pavement micro-texture provides actual contact with the tire and comprises the adhesion part of friction [11].
Typically, measurement of pavement macro-texture adopts the sand patch method, the outflow meter, or the circular texture meter (CTM) using a two-dimensional (2D) texture profile [12]. Indicators like mean texture depth (MTD), mean profile depth (MPD), or root mean square depth (RMSD) is customarily applied to characterize pavement macro-texture [13]. Besides, the pavement micro-texture is evaluated by indirect friction measurement devices testing at low speed, such as the British portable tester (BPT), the dynamic friction tester (DFT), and the locked-wheel skid trailer [12].
Recently, pavement surface micro-texture was measured with high-resolution cameras in the laboratory to obtain more texture details [14]. Moreover, the advanced high-resolution laser device can conveniently collect three-dimensional (3D) surface texture data from the field and achieve enough accuracy to characterize pavement micro- and macro-texture [15]. The acquisition of high-resolution surface texture information can significantly assist the investigation of the micro- and macro-texture contributions to skid resistance [16].
Further, 3D areal surface texture parameters have been utilized extensively in modern manufacturing industries to control and evaluate the surface finishing of products [17]. The 3D areal texture parameters contain aspects of surface height, spatial, hybrid, function, and feature information, whereas the traditional parameters only contain height information [17]. The areal texture parameters can characterize surface texture functionality and understand texture characteristics in different perspectives that the traditional texture parameter fails to achieve [18]. Therefore, some recent studies attempted to evaluate pavement texture using 3D areal parameters and correlate them with skid resistance [19,20,21]. The study described in this paper used 3D areal parameters to evaluate pavement texture changes under traffic loading.
Many studies have been performed to investigate how traffic polish affects pavement texture over time so that pavement can be constructed with desired texture features to maintain good skid resistance [22]. Several devices were developed to study the wear-resisting feature of pavements in the laboratory, such as the Wehner/Schulze device (W/S) [23], the Aachen polishing machine (APM) [24], and other accelerated polishing machines [25,26,27,28]. These devices evaluate the evolution of pavement texture under simulated traffic polishing in controlled laboratory conditions rather than actual traffic polishing from various vehicles.
Further, Kane et al. proposed a polishing model to predict the surface variation with polishing cycles based on laboratory testing using the W/S machine and adopted the roughness parameters (Rq) to validate the model [29]. Druta et al. conducted accelerated polish testing on stone matrix asphalt (SMA) species and found that MPD had completely different changing trends with BPN during the polish process [30]. Wang et al. tried to quantify the effect of aggregate size with W/S device on polishing resistance, and the texture variation characterized by power spectral density (PSD) showed that the coarser aggregate had a significantly rougher texture [5]. Wu and Abadie simulated the wearing process with an accelerated polishing machine and measured MPD with a CTM, and the results indicated that the MPD values tended to remain constant under different polishing cycles [31]. Plati and Pomoni investigated the long-term field data of skid resistance and macro-texture and found that the MPD and grip number (GN) presented a contrary trend under traffic polish [32].

1.2. Research Need

Several limitations in previous studies have been identified and summarized as follows:
(1)
Many previous studies evaluated pavement wear performance in the laboratory using polishing machines. In laboratory studies, it is challenging to repeat the actual pavement polish process in the field involving traffic polishing from various vehicle types under different environmental conditions such as temperature, precipitation, or freeze-thaw cycles.
(2)
In previous studies, 2D texture profiles were typically collected at the macro-texture level to evaluate pavement texture variation under traffic polish. With the advancement of pavement data collection, high-resolution 3D texture data should be applied to understand better the evolution of asphalt pavement micro- and macro-texture under traffic polish.
(3)
Traditional pavement texture parameters only consider texture height distribution while miss other texture characteristics (such as spatial, hybrid, and so on). Hence, different categories of 3D areal parameters should be explored to characterize pavement micro- and macro-texture under traffic polishing from different aspects.
Therefore, it is necessary to conduct field studies to understand pavement micro- and macro-texture evolution under actual traffic polish using different 3D areal texture parameters.

1.3. Objective

In this study, a field asphalt pavement site was monitored from 2018 to 2020 to study the influence of traffic polish on the evolution of pavement micro- and macro-texture. Pavement 3D texture images were collected using an LS-40 3D laser scanner (HyMIT Measurement Instrument Technology, Austin, TX, USA) for three years. Then, pavement micro- and macro-texture were separated from the obtained 3D texture data using two-dimensional discrete Fourier Transform method and Butterworth filters method 21. Next, twenty 3D areal parameters from five categories (height, spatial, hybrid, function, and feature) were calculated for pavement 3D micro- and macro-texture. The obtained micro- and macro-texture parameters in three years were analyzed to describe the evolution of surface texture under actual traffic polish from different perspectives.

2. Field Data Collection

This study selected the field site on a suburb road paved with dense-graded asphalt mixture (HMA-13) in Yongning avenue, located in an industrial district of Chengdu, China. There were about 3 million passage cars on this site in 2019, and the traffic volume had an 11.9% growth in 2020. The site was constructed in 2018 and monitored until 2020 for pavement texture variations under actual traffic polishing.
Figure 1 shows example pavement images from this site in 2018, 2019, and 2020, individually. Most of the aggregates were coated with bitumen in 2018 when the pavement was just constructed (Figure 1a). After traffic polish from 2018 to 2019, the bitumen layer was gradually removed, and the coarse aggregate was exposed to field environmental effect and traffic polishing and compacting, as shown in Figure 1b. Further, the texture of coarse aggregates in 2020 looked smoother and more aging than that in 2019 due to traffic polish (see Figure 1c).
Figure 2a shows the LS-40 Portable Surface Analyzer (LS-40, HyMIT Measurement Instrument Technology, Austin, TX, USA) that was used to record 3D texture images on this site to quantify pavement texture evolution due to traffic polish. The LS-40 scans a 102.4 × 102.4 mm pavement surface area with height resolution (z) at 0.01 mm and lateral resolution (x, y) at 0.05 mm. From 2018 to 2020, a total number of 42 3D texture images were obtained from the wheel path during each data collection from previously marked locations on this site.
The 3D texture data collected by LS-40 was denoised (see Figure 2b) by a Gaussian smoothing filter with a kernel size of 5 × 5. Then the Fourier transform converted the texture height data into the frequency domain, and the Butterworth filter separated texture components in the frequency domain into micro-texture and macro-texture at a boundary of 2 Hz. Subsequently, the inverse Fourier transform converted the frequency domain micro-texture and macro-texture data back to texture height data, respectively, as shown in Figure 2c,d. The detailed procedure of texture data processing was published in a previous research [21].
Figure 3 shows an example of how 3D pavement micro- and macro-texture changed from 2018 to 2020. It is noteworthy that the height of macro-texture was decreasing over time and tiny stripes formed on the micro-texture along driving direction in 2020. To characterize the evolution of micro- and macro-texture, quantitative analysis is conducted in the following section via 3D areal parameters.

3. Three Dimensional Areal Parameters

In this section, twenty 3D areal texture parameters from five categories (height, spatial, hybrid, functional, and feature) were calculated for both 3D micro- and macro-texture to investigate the evolution of pavement surface texture under actual traffic polishing and environmental impacts. The category, name, and unit of these 3D areal parameters are summarized in Table 1. The detailed definition of these parameters is introduced as follows.

3.1. Height Parameters

The height parameters consider the surface height information, but neglect the horizontal input. In this section, four height parameters, including arithmetic mean height (Sa), root mean square height (Sq), skewness (Ssk), and kurtosis (Sku), were calculated per Equations (1)–(4) [10]. The Sa and Sq measure the overall height of a surface and correlate intensely with each other, and the Ssk and Sku describe the shape of the surface probability density [10]. The Ssk indicates the symmetry of the height probability density curve, and the Sku characterizes the kurtosis of the probability density curve. Pavement surface with positive Ssk would have spike structure, and surface with negative Ssk would have valley structure. Moreover, a higher Sku implies more significant height variation of surface peaks or valleys. Significantly, the Ssk is 0.0 and the Sku is 3.0 when the surface probability density function is Gaussian distribution [33].
S a = 1 A | z ( x , y ) | dxdy
S q = 1 A z ( x , y ) 2   dxdy
S sk = 1 A   S q 3 z ( x , y ) 3   dxdy
S ku = 1 AS q 4 z ( x , y ) 4   dxdy
where A is the area of a 3D image; z is the height value of pixels in a 3D image; x and y are the horizontal coordinates of pixels in a 3D image.

3.2. Spatial Parameters

The calculation of spatial parameters involves the autocorrelation function (ACF) of a 3D texture surface. The ACF calculates the similar degree of a surface z(x, y) and the duplicate surface z(x-τx, y-τy) with a horizontal shift (τx, τy) [17]. Equation (2) shows the function to calculate ACF, and Figure 4a shows the ACF of an obtained LS-40 data as an example. For instance, the ACF is 1.0 when the LS-40 data has a horizontal shift (0, 0), the ACF equals 0.2 when the LS-40 data has a horizontal change along the red circle highlighted in Figure 4a.
The spatial parameters, including autocorrelation length (Sal), texture aspect ratio (Str), and texture direction (Std), were obtained for each LS-40 data per Equations (5)–(8) using 0.2 as the threshold of ACF. Figure 4b illustrates an example of how to calculate r min , r max , and θ from the red circle when ACF = 0.2 [10]. The Sal is defined as the horizontal distance r min that has the fastest decay to ACF = 0.2 [34]. Additionally, the Str is calculated as the ratio of the fastest decay distance rmin to the slowest decay distance rmax, which is the most critical indicator to characterize isotropy of surface texture in the horizontal direction. The surface is isotropic when Str equals 1, and the surface is anisotropic when Str equals 0. Further, the Std gives the angle of rmax for a surface texture, as shown in Figure 4b.
ACF ( τ x , τ y ) = z ( x , y ) z ( x τ x , y τ y ) dxdy z 2 ( x , y ) dxdy
S al = min τ x ,   τ y R   τ x 2 + τ y 2 = r min
where R = { ( τ x , τ y ) : ACF ( τ x , τ y ) 0.2 } .
S tr = r min r max  
S td = θ
where τx and τy are the shifting along and perpendicular to the driving direction, respectively; rmax and rmin are the slowest and fastest decay distance to ACF = 0.2, respectively; θ is the angle between rmax and driving direction.

3.3. Hybrid Parameters

The hybrid parameters describe the height and spacing information of a surface texture. They measure the angular slope of the 3D profile and are handy for assessing friction, adhesion, vibration, etc. The root mean square gradient (Sdq) and developed interfacial area ratio (Sdr) were calculated per Equations (9) and (10) as the hybrid parameters based on the surface local gradient. The Sdq and Sdr can be utilized to assess surface cosmetic flatness and correlate to adhesion property [35]. A flat surface would have both Sdq, and Sdr value equals 0. Besides, a 45° inclined surface would have a Sdq value of 1 and a Sdq value of 41.4%.
S dq = 1 A ( z x ) 2 + ( z y ) 2 dxdy
S dr = 1 A { [ 1 + ( z x ) 2 + ( z y ) 2 1 ] dxdy } × 100 %

3.4. Function Parameters

The function parameters are strongly associated with surface functions, such as wearing, bearing, and hydroplaning. Three sub-categories of functional parameters, material ratio, stratified, and volume, were calculated for 3D micro- and macro-texture data based on the cumulative height distribution curve or material ratio curve. The dashed line in Figure 5 shows examples of the cumulative height curve of the 3D texture. The ordinate is the surface height, and the abscissa is the cumulative probability above a certain height. The function parameters characterize peak, core, and valley features of pavement micro- and macro-texture. Details of how to calculate stratified and volume parameters per the cumulative height curve are introduced as follows.

3.4.1. Material Ratio Parameters

The areal material ratio parameters employ the peak extreme height (Sxp) and the surface section difference (Sdc) to characterize the upper half part and the general height of a surface, respectively [18]. The calculation of Sxp considers the surface part among the mean plane (50%) and the summit (2.5%). The parameter Sdc defines the general height difference of the surface without taking the highest peaks (below 2%) and the lowest valleys (above 98%) into account, as shown in Equations (11) and (12).
S xp = S mc ( 2.5 % ) S mc ( 50 % )
S dc = S mc ( 2 % ) S mc ( 98 % )
where S mc ( p ) is the height value c corresponding to a material ratio p in Figure 5a.

3.4.2. Stratified Parameters

According to the cumulative height distribution curve, the surface topography is stratified into three parts: peak layer, core layer, and valley layer. The three parts of a surface texture are represented by reduced peak height (Spk), core height (Sk), and reduced dale height (Svk), as shown in Figure 5a [10]. The calculation of stratified parameters in this study requires the following steps, as illustrated in Figure 5a:
  • First, a straight line is plotted tangent to the middle part of the dashed cumulative height distribution curve. The tangent line intersects the vertical axes of percentage 0% and 100% at two points, A and B. The corresponding height of A and B are peak and valley thresholds.
  • Then, points C and D are projected on the cumulative height distribution curve for heights A and B to define percentages of Smr1 and Smr2. The height difference of A and B is defined as Sk.
  • The area enclosed below the cumulative height distribution curve and above AC is represented by the triangle ACE that has an equivalent area. The height difference of E and A is defined as Spk.
  • The area enclosed above the cumulative height distribution curve and below BD is represented by the triangle BDF that has an equivalent area. The height difference of F and B is defined as Svk.
Generally, the Spk measures the equivalent height of the surface summit, which is the primary and the most worn surface height. The Sk evaluates the long-term contact height of a surface. The Svk measures the equivalent height of deep grooves, which would hold debris from the upper surface [36].

3.4.3. Volume Parameters

The peak material volume (Vmp), core material volume (Vmc), core void volume (Vvc), and dales void volume (Vvv) were calculated as per Equations (13)–(16) [10] as volume parameters and illustrated in Figure 5b. The material ratios, 10% and 80%, are specified as thresholds of the accumulated height to define peak and void of a surface texture [10]. The Vmp represents the material volume that is most likely to be removed by traffic polish. Moreover, the Vmc measures the material volume polished by traffic but not as much as the Vmp is. The Vvc is the surface void volume opposite to the Vmc. The Vvv indicates the void volume with a cumulative height distribution of the lowest 20%.
V mp = V m ( 10 % )
V mc = V m ( 80 % ) V m ( 10 % )
V vc = V v ( 10 % ) V v ( 80 % )
V vv = V v ( 80 % )
where Vm(mr) is material volume above the height corresponding to a material ratio mr to the highest peak; Vv(mr) is void volume below the height corresponding to a material ratio mr to the lowest valley.
As shown in Figure 5, stratified parameters and volume parameters divide the surface texture into peak, core, and valley with a different method based on the cumulative height distribution curve. To define surface peak and valley, volume parameters use 10% and 80% material ratios, whereas stratified parameters utilize the tangent line of the cumulative height distribution curve to determine mr1 and mr2. Further, volume parameters calculate these layers’ material or void volume, and the stratified parameters estimate equivalent height for surface peak or valley layer.

3.5. Feature Parameters

The feature parameters can be used to characterize specified features of surface texture. The peak density, Spd, is calculated by dividing the number of peaks by the unit area, and the peak curvature, Spc, is the arithmetic mean curvature of significant peaks. A peak is selected as the highest pixel within a 16 by 16 nearest neighbors. These two feature parameters can be applied in surface contact models [37].

4. Evolution of Micro- and Macro-Texture

The evolution of pavement micro- and macro-texture was evaluated by comparing 3D areal texture parameters from the three years’ data collection on the field site. The Figure 6, Figure 7, Figure 9, and Figures 11–14 summarize the variations of height, spatial, hybrid, function, and feature parameters for pavement micro- and macro-texture under actual traffic polishing. In each figure, the lines with markers display the actual 3D parameters from each data collection, while the bar chart in the upper-right corner shows the average number and standard deviation of each 3D parameter.

4.1. Evolution of Height Parameters

The variations of height parameters for pavement micro- and macro-texture under actual traffic polish are shown in Figure 6. For macro-texture from 2018 to 2020, (1) both Sa and Sq had no significant distinction in mean value and standard deviation, indicating that traffic polishing was not decreasing the macro-texture’s height. This result corresponds to a previous study that the MPD values tended to remain constant under different polishing cycles [31]; (2) the negative Ssk indicates that pavement macro-texture had valley structure; (3) the declined average Sku means that the height variation of surface peaks or valleys was decreasing.
For micro-texture from 2018 to 2020, (1) the Sa and Sq had an approximate reduction of 20% from 2018 to 2019, and 5% from 2019 to 2020; (2) the Ssk were positive and decreased year after year, suggesting the spike structure of micro-texture was decreasing; (3) the Sku was greater than that of macro-texture and gradually reduced, which means the considerable height variation of micro-texture was decreasing as well. The evolution of these height parameters means the spike structure of pavement micro-texture was gradually polished under traffic, as illustrated in Figure 3b.

4.2. Evolution of Spatial Parameters

The variation of spatial parameters for pavement micro- and macro-texture is displayed in Figure 7. For macro-texture from 2018 to 2020, (1) the Sal had a 19.5% growth from 2018 to 2019 and stabilized from 2019 to 2020; (2) the Str was around 0.76 during polish, which means the isotropy of macro-texture was unchanged; (3) the Std was fluctuating around zero. Examples of ACF = 0.2 for macro-texture from 2018 to 2020 are shown in Figure 8a: the shape was stable, meaning the spatial characteristics of macro-texture were not changed from 2018 to 2020 under traffic polish.
For micro-texture from 2018 to 2020, (1) the Sal had a descent of 62.3% from 2018 to 2019, and 36.7% from 2019 to 2020; (2) the Str decreased year after year, indicating the texture changed from isotropic to anisotropic under traffic polishing; (3) the Std was fluctuating around zero, and its deviation decreased year after year. As shown in Figure 8b, the shape of ACF = 0.2 was round in 2018 and became long and thin in 2020, which corresponded to Str = rmin/rmax decreased from 1.0 to 0.
The spatial evolution of micro-texture can be seen intuitively from Figure 3b. The micro-texture asperities were isotropically distributed in 2018, corresponding to Str = 1. The micro-texture asperities were anisotropic distributed along the driving direction: stripes appeared in 2020, and the Str equals 0. Thus, the spatial parameters successfully characterize how pavement micro-texture evolved from isotropic to anisotropic along driving direction under traffic polish.

4.3. Evolution of Hybrid Parameters

The variation of hybrid parameters for pavement micro- and macro-texture is displayed in Figure 9. Similar decreasing treads were observed for Sdq and Sdr from 2018 to 2020. For Sdq, a reduction of 46.1% and 32.8% were observed for macro- and micro-texture from 2018 to 2019, and another 16.0% and 11.5% of reduction were observed for macro- and micro-texture from 2019 to 2020. As Sdq is getting closer to 0, it means the texture surface is getting close to flat under traffic polish with angular slope decreased. For Sdr, reductions of 43.4% and 32.8% were observed for macro- and micro-texture from 2018 to 2019, and another 16.0% and 113.4% of reduction for macro- and micro-texture from 2019 to 2020. The evolution of hybrid parameters suggests that the steepness and the developed interfacial area of pavement micro- and macro-texture were decreased year after year under traffic polish.

4.4. Evolution of Function Parameters

Under traffic polishing, the peak and valley of pavement texture change over time. The cumulative height distribution curve of pavement texture provides an ideal tool to visualize how the texture profile changes due to polishing. Figure 10 shows examples of cumulative height distribution curves for macro- and micro-texture over the years. For example, for macro-texture, the material ratio corresponding to height 8 mm were 41.0% in 2018, 30.1% in 2019, and 16.5% in 2020; for micro-texture, the material ratio corresponding to height 0.05 mm were 4.9% in 2018, 3.4% in 2019, and 2.4% in 2020. This implies that the material of pavement texture was worn due to traffic polish.
Notably, the cumulative height distribution curve of macro-texture in 2019 was lower than that of 2018. It means that the texture material was worn, and the texture valley was increased from 2018 to 2019, which should correspond to the bitumen removal process. The cumulative height distribution curve of macro-texture in 2020 was lower at the peak layer and core layer but higher at the valley layer than that of 2019. This phenomenon illustrates that the upper part of macro-texture was removed by traffic polishing and field environmental erosion, and the valley void collected dust, debris, or chipping under traffic polishing. Besides, micro-texture’s cumulative height distribution curve was getting lower year after year, suggesting micro-texture was consistently polished by traffic.

4.4.1. Evolution of Material Ratio Parameters

The variation of material ratio parameters for pavement micro- and macro-texture is displayed in Figure 11. For macro-texture from 2018 to 2020, (1) the Sxp slightly increased from 2018 to 2019 and remained stable after the second polish year; (2) the Sdc kept almost unchanged. For micro-texture from 2018 to 2020, (1) the Sxp had a 20% decrement from 2018 to 2019 and another 7.5% decrement from 2019 to 2020; (2) the Sdc decreased by20% and 6.9%, respectively, after the first and second years of polishing. The material ratio parameters of micro-texture changed more than that of macro-texture by traffic polish, suggesting traffic polish mainly affects materials of micro-texture.

4.4.2. Evolution of Stratified Parameters

The variation of stratified parameters for pavement micro- and macro-texture is displayed in Figure 12. For macro-texture from 2018 to 2020, (1) the Spk increased by 17.6% from 2018 to 2019 and remained unchanged roughly after the second year of polishing, indicating that the peak layer remained unchanged after the bitumen layer was removed; (2) the Svk of macro-texture decreased by 10% and 5.7% for each polishing year, which implies that the valley structure of macro-texture was gradually filled by dust, debris, or residue under traffic polishing; (3) the Sk showed minor variance after two years of traffic polish, which means the core layer of macro-texture was stable under traffic polish. Therefore, the variation of stratified parameters for macro-texture reveals that the traffic polish mainly affects the peak and valley layers but not the core layer of pavement macro-texture.
For micro-texture from 2018 to 2020, (1) the Spk and Sk had significant decrement after the first year’s polish and minor change after the second year’s polish; (2) the mean value and standard deviation of micro-texture Svk was almost zero, because the dale stratification did not exist in the cumulative height distribution curve of micro-texture, as shown in Figure 10b. It means traffic polish affects peak, core, and valley layers of pavement micro-texture.

4.4.3. Evolution of Volume Parameters

Figure 13 shows the variation of volume parameters in three years for pavement micro- and macro-texture. For macro-texture from 2018 to 2020, (1) the Vmp increased 9.9% and 5.9% after each polishing year, suggesting more material from the peak layer was exposed under traffic polish; (2) the Vmc and Vvc remained unchanged, indicating the material and void volume of core layer was unaffected by traffic polish; (3) the Vvv slightly decreased 8.5% and 3.9% sequential under traffic, meaning the void volume of valley layer was gradually reduced by collecting dust, debris, or residue under traffic polishing.
For micro-texture from 2018 to 2020, (1) the Vmp decreased by 42.9% and 14.0%; (2) the Vmc decreased by 16.7% from 2018 to 2019, and changed minor (2.9%) after the second year’s traffic polish; (3) the Vvc had a large descend of 17.8% from 2018 to 2019, and minor change (4.7%) from 2019 to 2020; (4) the Vvv also had consecutive drops of 16.0% and 1.9%. This result implies that traffic polish affects the material and void volume of pavement micro-texture.
Therefore, the volume parameters suggest that traffic polish influences pavement macro-texture in the following aspects: (1) exposed more material from the peak layer into contact; (2) filled up the valley layer with dust, debris, or residue; (3) had a minor impact on the core layer. Additionally, traffic polish consistently reduced the height or volume of pavement micro-texture peak, core, and valley layers.

4.5. Evolution of Feature Parameters

The evolution of feature parameters for macro- and micro-texture is shown in Figure 14. Generally, the Spd of macro-texture had a tiny descend of around 5%, which means the number of contact peaks was reduced by abrasion. The average number of Spc dropped 26.3% after the first year’s polish, corresponding to the removal of the bitumen layer and fine aggregate. Then the Spc had only a 7% drop from 2019 to 2020, because the coarse aggregate in pavement structure was gradually exposed and was harder to get worn than bitumen layer under traffic polish.
Unlike the macro-texture, the Spd of micro-texture was slightly increased year after year, as displayed in Figure 14b. The enlarged micro-texture in Figure 3b also shows more peaks existed on micro-texture over time due to traffic polish. The coarse aggregate exposure from 2018 to 2019 and the new micro-texture generated in the wearing process of coarse aggregates from 2019 to 2020 may contribute to the increased Spd. However, the Spc was lessening by 33% and 17% after each year’s polish, which means the pavement micro-texture was gradually rounded by polish.

5. Conclusions

This paper applies 3D areal parameters to investigate asphalt pavement micro- and macro-texture evolution under actual traffic polish and environmental conditions. The portable 3D laser scanner LS-40 collected high-resolution 3D pavement texture data from predefined locations on a field site in 2018, 2019, and 2020, respectively. The obtained LS-40 data was decomposed into pavement micro- and macro-texture data sets to calculate 3D areal texture parameters. A total number of twenty parameters under five categories (height, spatial, hybrid, functional, and feature) were calculated to study the evolution of pavement micro- and macro-texture under actual traffic polish. The conclusions are summarized as follows:
  • the traffic polish and environmental conditions change the pavement micro-texture as follows: (1) the spike structure was gradually shrunk; (2) the spatial characterization evolved from isotropic to anisotropic; (3) the steepness and the developed interfacial area were decreased; (4) the height or volume of the peak, core, and valley layers reduced consistently; and (5) the peak density increased but peak curvature decrease.
  • the traffic polish and environmental conditions change the pavement macro-texture as follows: (1) the had valley structure and the height variation of surface peaks decreased; (2) the spatial characteristics were not changed under traffic polish; (3) its steepness and the developed interfacial area were decreased; (4) the material of the peak layer removed, and the valley layer filled up with dust, debris, or residue, and (5) the peak density and peak curvature were all decreased.
The results demonstrate the advantage of 3D areal parameters to describe the evolution characterization of pavement micro- and macro-texture under traffic polish. However, this paper only recorded texture data from one asphalt mixture in three years. Thus, it is expected that more asphalt pavement texture categories could be collected for a longer time frame in a future study to understand how traffic polish affects pavement micro- and macro-texture for different pavements. Furthermore, the relationship of texture wear and skid resistance should be studied in the future as well.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.Z.; methodology, Y.Z. and G.Y.; software, Y.Z.; validation, Y.Z. and G.Y.; formal analysis, Y.Z. and G.Y.; investigation, Y.Z.; resources, W.H., Y.L., Y.Q., K.C.P.W.; data curation, Y.Z. and G.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.Z.; writing—review and editing, Y.Z. and G.Y.; visualization, Y.Z.; supervision, W.H., Y.L., Y.Q., K.C.P.W.; project administration, Y.Z.; funding acquisition, W.H., Y.L. and Y.Q. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by [National Natural Science Foundation of China] grant number [51778541 and 51878574], [Sichuan Province Science and Technology Project] grant number [2020YFS0362], and [Sichuan Province Youth Science and Technology Innovation Team] grant number [2021JDTD0023]. The APC was funded by [National Natural Science Foundation of China] grant number [51778541].

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fwa, T. Skid resistance determination for pavement management and wet-weather road safety. Int. J. Transp. Sci. Technol. 2017, 6, 217–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Giles, C.G.; Sabey, B.E. Skidding as a factor in accidents on the roads of Great Britain. In Proceedings of the First International Skid Prevention Conference, Charlottesville, VA, USA, 1959; pp. 27–40. [Google Scholar]
  3. Xiao, J.; Kulakowski, B.T.; Ei-Gindy, M. Prediction of Risk of Wet-Pavement Accidents: Fuzzy Logic Model. Transp. Res. Rec. 2000, 1717, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chu, L.; Fwa, T.F. Incorporating pavement skid resistance and hydroplaning risk considerations in asphalt mix design. J. Transp. Eng. 2016, 142, 04016039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, D.; Liu, P.; Xu, H.; Kollmann, J.; Oeser, M. Evaluation of the polishing resistance characteristics of fine and coarse aggregate for asphalt pavement using Wehner/Schulze test. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 163, 742–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chu, L.; Zhou, B.; Fwa, T.F. Directional characteristics of traffic polishing effect on pavement skid resistance. Int. J. Pavement Eng. 2021, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Do, M.-T.; Tang, Z.; Kane, M.; de Larrard, F. Evolution of road-surface skid-resistance and texture due to polishing. Wear 2009, 266, 574–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kanafi, M.M.; Kuosmanen, A.; Pellinen, T.K.; Tuononen, A.J. Macro- and micro-texture evolution of road pavements and correlation with friction. Int. J. Pavement Eng. 2015, 16, 168–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ueckermann, A.; Wang, D.; Oeser, M.; Steinauer, B. Calculation of skid resistance from texture measurements. J. Traffic Transp. Eng. (Engl. Ed.) 2015, 2, 3–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. ISO. Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Surface Texture: Areal—Part 2: Terms, Definitions and Surface Texture Parameters; ISO 25178-2:2012(en); ISO: London, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gheni, A.; Abdelkarim, O.I.; AbdulAzeez, M.M.; ElGawady, M. Texture and design of green chip seal using recycled crumb rubber aggregate. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 166, 1084–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Flintsch, G.W.; De León, E.; McGhee, K.K.; Ai-Qadi, I.L. Pavement Surface Macrotexture Measurement and Applications. Transp. Res. Rec. 2003, 1860, 168–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Abe, H.; Tamai, A.; Henry, J.J.; Wambold, J. Measurement of Pavement Macrotexture with Circular Texture Meter. Transp. Res. Rec. 2001, 1764, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chen, J.; Huang, X.; Zheng, B.; Zhao, R.; Liu, X.; Cao, Q.; Zhu, S. Real-time identification system of asphalt pavement texture based on the close-range photogrammetry. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 226, 910–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Meegoda, J.N.; Gao, S. Evaluation of pavement skid resistance using high speed texture measurement. J. Traffic Transp. Eng. (Engl. Ed.) 2015, 2, 382–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Zuniga-Garcia, N.; Prozzi, J.A. Contribution of Micro- and Macro-Texture for Predicting Friction on Pavement Surfaces (No. CHPP Report-UTA# 3-2016). Available online: https://www.chpp.egr.msu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/CHPP-Report-UTA3-2017_Texture.pdf (accessed on 12 September 2021).
  17. Leach, R. Characterisation of Areal Surface Texture; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, L.; Wang, K.C.; Li, Q. Geometric texture indicators for safety on AC pavements with 1 mm 3D laser texture data. Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. 2016, 9, 49–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Li, Q.; Yang, G.; Wang, K.C.P.; Zhan, Y.; Wang, C. Novel Macro- and Microtexture Indicators for Pavement Friction by Using High-Resolution Three-Dimensional Surface Data. Transp. Res. Rec. 2017, 2641, 164–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yang, G.; Yu, W.; Li, Q.J.; Wang, K.; Peng, Y.; Zhang, A. Random Forest–Based Pavement Surface Friction Prediction Using High-Resolution 3D Image Data. J. Test. Eval. 2019, 49, 1141–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zou, Y.; Yang, G.; Cao, M. Neural network-based prediction of sideway force coefficient for asphalt pavement using high-resolution 3D texture data. Int. J. Pavement Eng. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dunford, A.M.; Parry, A.R.; Shipway, P.H.; Viner, H.E. Three-dimensional characterisation of surface texture for road stones undergoing simulated traffic wear. Wear 2012, 292, 188–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. BS EN 12697-49: Bituminous Mixtures–Test Methods for Hot Mix Asphalt. Part 49: Determination of Friction after Polishing; BSI: London, UK, 2014.
  24. Wang, D.; Chen, X.; Xie, X.; Stanjek, H.; Oeser, M.; Steinauer, B. A study of the laboratory polishing behavior of granite as road surfacing aggregate. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 89, 25–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lei, C. Study on Pavement Surface Function Accelerated Loading System; Graduate Faculty of South China University of Technology: Guangzhou, China, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  26. Liang, R.Y. Long Term Validation of an Accelerated Polishing Test Procedure for HMA Pavements; Technical Report; Ohio Department of Transportation and the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration: Columbus, OH, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  27. Ren, W.; Han, S.; He, Z.; Li, J.; Wu, S. Development and testing of a multivariable accelerated abrasion machine to characterize the polishing wear of pavement by tires. Surf. Topogr. Metrol. Prop. 2019, 7, 035006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Vollor, T.W.; Hanson, D.I. Development of laboratory procedure for measuring friction of HMA mixtures–PHASE I. In Final Report of NCAT; North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University: Greensboro, NC, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kane, M.; Do, M.T.; Piau, J.M. On the Study of Polishing of Road Surface under Traffic Load. J. Transp. Eng. 2010, 136, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Druta, C.; Wang, L.; Lane, D.S. Evaluation of the MMLS3 for Accelerated Wearing of Asphalt Pavement Mixtures Containing Carbonate Aggregates. Available online: https://www.virginiadot.org/vtrc/main/online_reports/pdf/14-r17.pdf (accessed on 12 September 2021).
  31. Wu, Z.; Abadie, C. Laboratory and field evaluation of asphalt pavement surface friction resistance. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 2018, 12, 372–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Plati, C.; Pomoni, M. Impact of Traffic Volume on Pavement Macrotexture and Skid Resistance Long-Term Performance. Transp. Res. Rec. 2019, 2673, 314–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Blunt, L.; Jiang, X. Advanced Techniques for Assessment Surface Topography: Development of a Basis for 3D Surface Texture Standards "Surfstand"; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  34. Barányi, I.; Czifra, Á.; Kalácska, G. Height-independent topographic parameters of worn surfaces. Int. J. Sustain. Constr. Des. 2011, 2, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Franco, L.A.; Sinatora, A. 3D surface parameters (ISO 25178-2): Actual meaning of Spk and its relationship to Vmp. Precis. Eng. 2015, 40, 106–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Salguero, J.; Del Sol, I.; Vazquez-Martinez, J.; Schertzer, M.; Iglesias, P. Effect of laser parameters on the tribological behavior of Ti6Al4V titanium microtextures under lubricated conditions. Wear 2019, 426–427, 1272–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bush, A.; Gibson, R.; Thomas, T. The elastic contact of a rough surface. Wear 1975, 35, 87–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Pavement surface pictures from the field site: (a) May 2018, (b) June 2019, and (c) July 2020.
Figure 1. Pavement surface pictures from the field site: (a) May 2018, (b) June 2019, and (c) July 2020.
Materials 14 05769 g001
Figure 2. LS-40 and examples 3D texture data: (a) LS-40 Portable Surface Analyzer, (b) Denoised original image, (c) Macro-texture, and (d) Micro-texture.
Figure 2. LS-40 and examples 3D texture data: (a) LS-40 Portable Surface Analyzer, (b) Denoised original image, (c) Macro-texture, and (d) Micro-texture.
Materials 14 05769 g002
Figure 3. Evolution of pavement micro- and macro-texture: (a) Macro-texture, and (b) Micro-texture.
Figure 3. Evolution of pavement micro- and macro-texture: (a) Macro-texture, and (b) Micro-texture.
Materials 14 05769 g003
Figure 4. Calculation of spatial parameters: (a) ACF of an LS-40 data, and (b) rmin, rmax, and θ when ACF = 0.2.
Figure 4. Calculation of spatial parameters: (a) ACF of an LS-40 data, and (b) rmin, rmax, and θ when ACF = 0.2.
Materials 14 05769 g004
Figure 5. Calculation of function parameters: (a) Sketch of stratified parameters, and (b) Sketch of volume parameters.
Figure 5. Calculation of function parameters: (a) Sketch of stratified parameters, and (b) Sketch of volume parameters.
Materials 14 05769 g005
Figure 6. Pavement texture variations via height parameters: (a) Macro-texture, and (b) Micro-texture.
Figure 6. Pavement texture variations via height parameters: (a) Macro-texture, and (b) Micro-texture.
Materials 14 05769 g006
Figure 7. Pavement texture variations via spatial parameters: (a) Macro-texture, and (b) Micro-texture.
Figure 7. Pavement texture variations via spatial parameters: (a) Macro-texture, and (b) Micro-texture.
Materials 14 05769 g007
Figure 8. ACF = 0.2 for pavement macro- and micro-texture: (a) Macro-texture, and (b) Micro-texture.
Figure 8. ACF = 0.2 for pavement macro- and micro-texture: (a) Macro-texture, and (b) Micro-texture.
Materials 14 05769 g008
Figure 9. Pavement texture variations via hybrid parameters: (a) Macro-texture, and (b) Micro-texture.
Figure 9. Pavement texture variations via hybrid parameters: (a) Macro-texture, and (b) Micro-texture.
Materials 14 05769 g009
Figure 10. Cumulative height distribution curve of pavement macro- and micro-texture: (a) Macro-texture, and (b) Micro-texture.
Figure 10. Cumulative height distribution curve of pavement macro- and micro-texture: (a) Macro-texture, and (b) Micro-texture.
Materials 14 05769 g010
Figure 11. Pavement texture variations via material ratio parameters: (a) Macro-texture, and (b) Micro-texture.
Figure 11. Pavement texture variations via material ratio parameters: (a) Macro-texture, and (b) Micro-texture.
Materials 14 05769 g011
Figure 12. Pavement texture variations via stratified parameters: (a) Macro-texture, and (b) Micro-texture.
Figure 12. Pavement texture variations via stratified parameters: (a) Macro-texture, and (b) Micro-texture.
Materials 14 05769 g012
Figure 13. Pavement texture variations via volume parameters: (a) Macro-texture, and (b) Micro-texture.
Figure 13. Pavement texture variations via volume parameters: (a) Macro-texture, and (b) Micro-texture.
Materials 14 05769 g013
Figure 14. Pavement texture variations via feature parameters: (a) Macro-texture, and (b) Micro-texture.
Figure 14. Pavement texture variations via feature parameters: (a) Macro-texture, and (b) Micro-texture.
Materials 14 05769 g014
Table 1. Summary of 3D areal parameters.
Table 1. Summary of 3D areal parameters.
CategoryParametersUnit
Height Parametersarithmetic mean height (Sa)mm
root mean square height (Sq)mm
skewness (Ssk)-
kurtosis (Sku)-
Spatial
Parameters
autocorrelation length (Sal)mm
texture aspect ratio (Str)-
texture direction (Std)rad
Hybrid
Parameters
root mean square gradient (Sdq)-
developed interfacial area ratio (Sdr)%
Function
Related
Parameters
Material Ratio Parameterspeak extreme height (Sxp)mm
surface section difference (Sdc)mm
Stratified Parametersreduced peak height (Spk)mm
core height (Sk)mm
reduced dale height (Svk)mm
Volume
Parameters
peak material volume (Vmp)mm3
core material volume (Vmc)mm3
core void volume (Vvc)mm3
dales void volume (Vvv)mm3
Feature Parameterspeak density (Spd)mm−2
peak curvature (Spc)mm−1
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zou, Y.; Yang, G.; Huang, W.; Lu, Y.; Qiu, Y.; Wang, K.C.P. Study of Pavement Micro- and Macro-Texture Evolution Due to Traffic Polishing Using 3D Areal Parameters. Materials 2021, 14, 5769. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14195769

AMA Style

Zou Y, Yang G, Huang W, Lu Y, Qiu Y, Wang KCP. Study of Pavement Micro- and Macro-Texture Evolution Due to Traffic Polishing Using 3D Areal Parameters. Materials. 2021; 14(19):5769. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14195769

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zou, Yiwen, Guangwei Yang, Wanqing Huang, Yang Lu, Yanjun Qiu, and Kelvin C. P. Wang. 2021. "Study of Pavement Micro- and Macro-Texture Evolution Due to Traffic Polishing Using 3D Areal Parameters" Materials 14, no. 19: 5769. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14195769

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop