Next Article in Journal
Microorganism, Carriers, and Immobilization Methods of the Microbial Self-Healing Cement-Based Composites: A Review
Next Article in Special Issue
A Coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian Simulation and Tool Optimization for Belt Punching Process with a Single Cutting Edge
Previous Article in Journal
Methane and Carbon Dioxide Hydrate Formation and Dissociation in Presence of a Pure Quartz Porous Framework Impregnated with CuSn12 Metallic Powder: An Experimental Report
Previous Article in Special Issue
Drilling Force Characterization during Inconel 718 Drilling: A Comparative Study between Numerical and Analytical Approaches
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparison of NSGA-II, MOALO and MODA for Multi-Objective Optimization of Micro-Machining Processes

1
Department of Applied Science and Humanities, MPSTME SVKM’S Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies, Shirpur 425 405, India
2
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sikkim Manipal Institute of Technology, Sikkim Manipal University, Majhitar 737 136, India
3
Department of Automobile Engineering, Saveetha School of Engineering, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai 602 105, India
4
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology, Avadi 600 062, India
5
School of Computing, University of Eastern Finland, FI-70210 Kuopio, Finland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2021, 14(17), 5109; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14175109
Submission received: 2 July 2021 / Revised: 28 August 2021 / Accepted: 31 August 2021 / Published: 6 September 2021

Abstract

The popularity of micro-machining is rapidly increasing due to the growing demands for miniature products. Among different micro-machining approaches, micro-turning and micro-milling are widely used in the manufacturing industry. The various cutting parameters of micro-turning and micro-milling has a significant effect on the machining performance. Thus, it is essential that the cutting parameters are optimized to obtain the most from the machining process. However, it is often seen that many machining objectives have conflicting parameter settings. For example, generally, a high material removal rate (MRR) is accompanied by high surface roughness (SR). In this paper, metaheuristic multi-objective optimization algorithms are utilized to generate Pareto optimal solutions for micro-turning and micro-milling applications. A comparative study is carried out to assess the performance of non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II), multi-objective ant lion optimization (MOALO) and multi-objective dragonfly optimization (MODA) in micro-machining applications. The complex proportional assessment (COPRAS) method is used to compare the NSGA-II, MOALO and MODA generated Pareto solutions.
Keywords: process optimization; metaheuristics; ant lion optimization; dragonfly algorithm; NSGA process optimization; metaheuristics; ant lion optimization; dragonfly algorithm; NSGA

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Joshi, M.; Ghadai, R.K.; Madhu, S.; Kalita, K.; Gao, X.-Z. Comparison of NSGA-II, MOALO and MODA for Multi-Objective Optimization of Micro-Machining Processes. Materials 2021, 14, 5109. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14175109

AMA Style

Joshi M, Ghadai RK, Madhu S, Kalita K, Gao X-Z. Comparison of NSGA-II, MOALO and MODA for Multi-Objective Optimization of Micro-Machining Processes. Materials. 2021; 14(17):5109. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14175109

Chicago/Turabian Style

Joshi, Milan, Ranjan Kumar Ghadai, S. Madhu, Kanak Kalita, and Xiao-Zhi Gao. 2021. "Comparison of NSGA-II, MOALO and MODA for Multi-Objective Optimization of Micro-Machining Processes" Materials 14, no. 17: 5109. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14175109

APA Style

Joshi, M., Ghadai, R. K., Madhu, S., Kalita, K., & Gao, X.-Z. (2021). Comparison of NSGA-II, MOALO and MODA for Multi-Objective Optimization of Micro-Machining Processes. Materials, 14(17), 5109. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14175109

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop