Next Article in Journal
Theoretical and Experimental Investigation of Warpage Evolution of Flip Chip Package on Packaging during Fabrication
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparison of NSGA-II, MOALO and MODA for Multi-Objective Optimization of Micro-Machining Processes
Previous Article in Journal
Determining Johnson-Cook Constitutive Equation for Low-Carbon Steel via Taylor Anvil Test
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Geometry-Based Welding Distortion Prediction Tool
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Drilling Force Characterization during Inconel 718 Drilling: A Comparative Study between Numerical and Analytical Approaches

Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology—Dubai Campus, Dubai P.O. Box 341055, United Arab Emirates
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2021, 14(17), 4820; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14174820
Submission received: 3 July 2021 / Revised: 12 August 2021 / Accepted: 20 August 2021 / Published: 25 August 2021

Abstract

In drilling operations, cutting forces are one of the major machinability indicators that contribute significantly towards the deviations in workpiece form and surface tolerances. The ability to predict and model forces in such operations is also essential as the cutting forces play a key role in the induced vibrations and wear on the cutting tool. More specifically, Inconel 718—a nickel-based super alloy that is primarily used in the construction of jet engine turbines, nuclear reactors, submarines and steam power plants—is the workpiece material used in the work presented here. In this study, both mechanistic and finite element models were developed. The finite element model uses the power law that has the ability to incorporate strain hardening, strain rate sensitivity as well as thermal softening phenomena in the workpiece materials. The model was validated by comparing it against an analytical mechanistic model that considers the three drilling stages associated with the drilling operation on a workpiece containing a pilot hole. Both analytical and FE models were compared and the results were found to be in good agreement at different cutting speeds and feed rates. Comparing the average forces of stage II and stage III of the two approaches revealed a discrepancy of 11% and 7% at most. This study can be utilized in various virtual drilling scenarios to investigate the influence of different process and geometric parameters.
Keywords: Inconel; drilling force; FEA; modeling material removal Inconel; drilling force; FEA; modeling material removal

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pervaiz, S.; Samad, W.A. Drilling Force Characterization during Inconel 718 Drilling: A Comparative Study between Numerical and Analytical Approaches. Materials 2021, 14, 4820. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14174820

AMA Style

Pervaiz S, Samad WA. Drilling Force Characterization during Inconel 718 Drilling: A Comparative Study between Numerical and Analytical Approaches. Materials. 2021; 14(17):4820. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14174820

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pervaiz, Salman, and Wael A. Samad. 2021. "Drilling Force Characterization during Inconel 718 Drilling: A Comparative Study between Numerical and Analytical Approaches" Materials 14, no. 17: 4820. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14174820

APA Style

Pervaiz, S., & Samad, W. A. (2021). Drilling Force Characterization during Inconel 718 Drilling: A Comparative Study between Numerical and Analytical Approaches. Materials, 14(17), 4820. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14174820

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop