Next Article in Journal
Formation of Structure and Properties of Two-Phase Ti-6Al-4V Alloy during Cold Metal Transfer Additive Deposition with Interpass Forging
Previous Article in Journal
Compressive Properties of Functionally Graded Bionic Bamboo Lattice Structures Fabricated by FDM
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study on the Adhesion Performance of Asphalt-Calcium Silicate Hydrate Gel Interface in Semi-Flexible Pavement Materials Based on Molecular Dynamics

School of Civil Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2021, 14(16), 4406; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14164406
Submission received: 25 May 2021 / Revised: 20 July 2021 / Accepted: 4 August 2021 / Published: 6 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Construction and Building Materials)

Abstract

:
The interface between an asphalt binder and a calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) gel is a weak point of semi-flexible pavement material. In this study, the adhesion performance of asphalt-C-S-H gel interface in semi-flexible pavements at a molecular scale has been investigated. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were applied to establish three asphalt binders: 70# asphalt binder (the penetration is 70 mm), PG76-22 modified asphalt binder (a kind of asphalt binder that can adapt to the highest temperature of 76 °C and the lowest temperature of −22 °C), and S-HV asphalt binder (super high viscosity). The effects of different temperatures and SBS modifier contents on interfacial adhesion were explored. The obtained results showed that temperature variations had little effect on the adhesion work of the asphalt-C-S-H gel interface. It was also found that by increasing the content of SBS modifier, the adhesion work of the asphalt-C-S-H gel interface was increased. The molecular weight of each component was found to be an important factor affecting its molecular diffusion rate. The addition of SBS modifier could regulate the adsorption of aromatics by C-S-H gel in the four components of asphalt binder and improve the adsorption of resins by C-S-H gel.

1. Introduction

Traditional asphalt pavements are widely used in road engineering due to the good adhesion between asphalt binder and aggregates. However, asphalt pavement, as a viscoelastic material [1,2,3] suffers from long-term aging, rutting, fatigue cracking, and water erosion, which seriously affect its durability [4,5,6,7,8]. Compared with traditional asphalt pavement, semi-flexible pavement (SFP) has remarkable stiffness and durability and excellent pavement bearing capacity and rutting resistance [9,10,11,12,13,14,15].
In previous research, great efforts have mainly been made to improve the performance of asphalt binders, aggregates, and cement mortar in semi-flexible pavements, as well as their influence on cracked materials [16]. Yang [17] performed a cyclic wheel load and runway test-bed tests and found that the mechanical characteristics of semi-flexible materials were improved when the asphalt mixture air void was up to 26%. Zhang et al. [18] studied the effects of the compositions and formulations of cement paste and cement mortar on grouting performance, compared them in terms of fluidity, strength, and dry shrinkage, and finally found the best formula: the best water–cement ratio is 0.58, the best fly ash content is 10%, and the best mineral powder content is 10%. Ding et al. [19] found that the high- and low-temperature stabilities of semi-flexible pavement materials were higher than those of ordinary asphalt pavement materials and an increase in porosity improved the performance of matrix asphalt mixtures. Setyawa [20] studied the compressive performance of grouted macadam and determined the relationships between asphalt skeleton, cement slurry, and the type and size of aggregate. Husain [21] investigated the aggregate gradation, durability, and strength of cementitious materials through statistical analyses and obtained the effect of gradation on SFP material properties.
Although a great number of research has been conducted on the macroscopic performance of semi-flexible pavements, the asphalt-C-S-H gel interface is a weak point of this kind of pavement material and only microscopic analyses can reveal the interaction mechanism of the asphalt-C-S-H gel interface. As an increasingly mature tool, molecular dynamics (MD) can not only directly simulate the macroscopic evolution of matters, but also provide clear images of microstructures and particle motion, as well as their relationships and macroscopic properties. The application of MD simulation in asphalt mixtures is becoming increasingly popular, as it can describe the behavior of asphalt at a molecular level and determine the relationship between chemical composition and asphalt binder macroscopic properties such as viscosity, aging effect, self-healing performance, and diffusion behavior. These findings can also be applied to study the nano-mechanical properties of asphalt binders and asphalt aging [22,23,24,25,26,27].
In this study, MD was applied to establish 70# asphalt-C-S-H gel, PG76-22 modified asphalt-C-S-H gel, and S-HV modified asphalt-C-S-H gel models. In terms of the three aspects of adsorption strength, diffusion law and solubility law, it was found that the adhesion ability of the asphalt-C-S-H gel interface with different SBS contents was affected by variations in temperature and asphalt binder composition.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

2.1.1. Asphalt Binder Model

Asphalt has very complex chemical compositions with a variety of hydrocarbons and their non-metallic derivatives (a mixture of hydrocarbons and non-hydrocarbons). Therefore, it cannot be described as a single pure compound. In 1969, Corbett [28] developed a four-component analysis method to classify asphalt into saturates, aromatics, resins, and asphaltenes, which were widely applied in the design and micro-mechanism of asphalt materials on the molecular scale. Using this four-component asphalt model, researchers have evaluated the compatibility of asphalt and modifiers, the adhesion between asphalt and aggregate, and the effect of oxidative aging on asphalt binders [29,30,31,32]. In this research, a four-component asphalt model was established based on MS molecular dynamics software to perform simulation experiments, as shown in Figure 1.
In order to obtain a reasonable four-component asphalt model, initial density was set to 1 g/cm3 and pre-equilibrium operation of 100ps was carried out under NPT ensemble (temperature and pressure were set to 298K and 1 atm, respectively). Then, NPT simulations were performed under 500ps to reduce the unreasonable structures in the model. Finally, a stable asphalt model was obtained by 100ps simulation in NVE ensemble. The optimized asphalt model is shown in Figure 2.
In order to investigate the influence of different asphalt types on the interface, styrene–butadiene–styrene (SBS) was selected as an asphalt modifier and its molecular formula is shown in Figure 3. Asphalt with 4.27% SBS modifier was adopted for the simulation of PG76-22 modified asphalt and 11.8% SBS modifier was used for ultra-high viscosity modified asphalt (S-HV). The optimized molecular models of the two modified bitumen types are presented in Figure 4. The detailed compositions of the three asphalt binders are listed in Table 1.

2.1.2. C-S-H Gel Model

The hydration product of ordinary portland cement is mainly calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H), which is the key component determining cement properties. Figure 5 presents the SEM image of C-S-H gel. Since Grudemo [33] and Taylor [34] first studied the hydration products of cement, many researchers have carried out in-depth research on these products, developed a series of molecular models, and applied them in practical engineering. At present, the models developed by Hamid [35] and Bonaccorsi [36] are considered the best C-S-H models. In this study, the Bonaccorsi model was adopted as the initial C-S-H gel model in MD simulations.
The chemical formula of C-S-H is Ca9Si6O18(OH)6·8H2O. In this study, the component proportions given in Table 2 were used to prepare C-S-H gel unit cells using MS software. The molecular model of each component is shown in Figure 6. The edge lengths am, bm, and cm of the unit cells were 1.0576nm, 0.7265nm, and 1.0931nm, respectively. In order to make simulation systems more realistic, it was necessary to expand single cells. In this research, the dimensions of expanded crystals were 4am × 3bm × 2cm.
In order to establish an optimal C-S-H gel model, first the developed model was optimized. The initial density of gel model in this study was set to 2.325 g/cm3. 100 ps and 50 ps simulations were carried out under NPT and NVE ensembles, respectively (the temperature was set to 298K and pressure was 1atm). Then, an NPT calculation was performed under 500ps condition to reduce the number of unreasonable structures in the model. Finally, the optimal model was obtained by 100ps calculation in an NVE ensemble. The C-S-H gel molecular structure is shown in Figure 7.

2.1.3. Asphalt–C-S-H gel Model

In order to study the adhesion properties of different types of asphalt components on C-S-H gel surface at different temperatures, interfacial molecular models were constructed for different asphalt types and C-S-H gel. The models had a three-layer structure with the lower layer being C-S-H gel mixture, the middle layer being asphalt mixture, and the upper layer being the 50 Å vacuum layer. Four temperatures of −15 °C, 25 °C, 65 °C, and 105 °C were simulated. The interface models, as shown in Figure 8, were named Model A (70#asphalt), Model B (PG76-22 modified Asphalt), and Model C (S-HV modified asphalt).

2.2. Evaluation Index

2.2.1. Adhesion Work

Adhesion work between asphalt and C-S-H gel is defined as the decrease of interfacial free energy of the whole system due to the adhesion of asphalt to C-S-H gel. That is, increase of adhesion work increased the amount of released energy and improved adhesion performance. In this work, adhesion work was applied for the characterization of adsorption strength between different types of asphalt and C-S-H gel, as expressed in Equation (1).
E = Ea + EbEab,
where △E is adhesion work between asphalt and C-S-H gel (kcal/mol); Ea is energy in the presence of asphalt alone (kcal/mol); Eb is energy in the presence of C-S-H gel alone (kcal/mol); and Eab is the total energy of asphalt and C-S-H gel (kcal/mol).
Among them, adhesion was composed of Van der Waals and Coulomb electrostatic forces, as stated in Equation (2).
E = △Evdw + △Ecoulomb,
where △Evdw and △Ecoulomb are adhesive works due to Van der Waals and Coulomb electrostatic forces (kcal/mol), respectively.

2.2.2. Diffusion Coefficient

The diffusion coefficient is an important index in measuring the permeation and diffusion abilities of particles. In this study, the diffusion coefficient was applied for the characterization of the movement and migration abilities of the four components of asphalt on C-S-H gel surface. Using the Einstein equation, the diffusion coefficient was calculated from the long-time limit of mean azimuth shift. Diffusion coefficient and mean square displacement (MSD) were calculated using Equations (3) and (4), respectively.
M S D ( t ) = | r i   ( t ) r i   ( 0 ) | 2 ,
where ri (t) is the position vector of particle i at time t; ri (0) is the position vector of particle i at initial time; and < > denotes the average of all atoms in the group.
D = 1 6 lim t d d t i = 1 N | r i   ( t ) r i   ( 0 ) | 2 ,
where N is the number of particles diffused in the system and D is the diffusion coefficient of particles (m2/s).

2.2.3. Relative Concentration

Relative concentration can characterize the aggregation degree of substances in a certain range. It was found that the increase in relative concentration increased the content of asphalt components away from the surface of the C-S-H gel. When an asphalt component had a continuous peak concentration in a range away from the surface of the C-S-H gel, that asphalt component was aggregated in that range. The relative concentration profile of each asphalt component was applied to characterize its concentration variation on C-S-H gel surface at different temperatures, as stated in Equation (5).
Ω = m i M I   ×   100 % ,
where ω is relative concentration; I is the mass of an asphalt component in a layer; i represents any of the four components of asphalt, i.e., saturates, aromatics, resins, and asphaltenes; and M i is the total mass of an asphalt component.

2.3. Methods

The research method and technical workflow of this paper are shown in Figure 9. Firstly, three asphalt models and the C-S-H gel model were established, and then the established models were verified. Finally, the results were compared and analyzed based on three evaluation indexes.

3. Results

3.1. Model Verification

3.1.1. Asphalt Model

In order to verify the validity and applicability of the proposed asphalt molecular model, density and solubility parameters were adopted as evaluation indicators. The simulation and experimental results are summarized in Table 3.
It can be seen from Table 3 that the density and solubility of the asphalt structure simulated in this paper were both within the range of practical reference values. Among them, the simulation value of relative density was close to the lower limit, while that of the solubility parameter was close to the upper limit of the actual reference value. Due to differences in the composition of material complexity, a difference between simulated and actual values in this range was acceptable. In terms of relative density and solubility parameters, the asphalt molecular model developed in this study was found to be precise and reliable and could be used in subsequent MD simulations.

3.1.2. C-S-H Gel Model

In order to verify the validity of the C-S-H gel model developed in this research, its physical properties after optimization were simulated. According to calculations, the Young’s modulus of the gel model along the X direction was 31.6 GPa, which was consistent with the Young’s modulus range of C-S-H gel reported in references [38,39,40,41,42]. The calculated Young’s modulus was close to the upper limit of Young’s modulus range reported in the literature, because there was a certain difference between the purity of real and simulated materials and crystal was prone to defects. However, the physical values calculated by simulation were still within the range of experimentally obtained values. Therefore, the C-S-H gel model established in this study proved to be more reasonable and could be applied for subsequent MD simulations.

3.2. Adsorption Strength

According to the results obtained from MD calculations, using Equations (1) and (2) and the principle of adsorption strength, the values of the three types of asphalt and C-S-H gel at different temperatures were calculated, as given in Table 4.
It can be seen from Table 4 that for different types of asphalt, adhesion work between asphalt and C-S-H gel was mainly due to Coulomb electrostatic force, which accounted for more than 99%. The reason for this observation is that C-S-H gel is alkaline and has electrostatic interactions with polar molecules in asphalt. For the same type of asphalt, slight adhesion energy changes were witnessed at different temperatures, which indicated that temperature had little effect on the adhesion work between asphalt and C-S-H gel. Regarding different bitumen types at the same temperature, the order of adhesion work was 70# asphalt < PG76-22 modified asphalt < S-HV modified asphalt, which was because the SBS modifier content affected adhesion such that higher SBS modifier contents resulted in greater adhesion between the asphalt and C-S-H gel.

3.3. Diffusion Law

In order to analyze the diffusion laws of different asphalt types at different temperatures, as shown in Figure 10, the diffusivity changes of each component of 70# asphalt, PG76-22 modified asphalt, and S-HV modified asphalt at −15 °C, 25 °C, 65 °C, and 105 °C.
As can be seen from Figure 10a, the order of the diffusivity of the four components of asphalt at the same temperature was asphaltenes < resins < aromatics < saturates. This was contrary to the order of the molecular weight of asphalt components. Among them, the diffusion rate of saturates were found to be the highest and most affected by temperature, especially at temperatures above 65 °C. This was mainly because the diffusion rates of the four components of asphalt were strongly and negatively related to their molecular weight.
As could be seen from Figure 10b, the diffusion rate of light component saturates were the highest, followed by the aromatics component. Compared with 70# and S-HV modified asphalt types, the diffusion rate of saturates in PG76-22 modified asphalt was linearly increased. This revealed that the diffusion rate of saturates could be steadily increased by adding appropriate amounts of SBS modifier. At temperatures below 20 °C, the diffusion rate of asphaltenes was higher than that of resins. However, at temperatures above 20 °C, the diffusion curves of asphaltenes and resins were intertwined with each other, indicating that SBS modifier could enhance the diffusion rate of asphaltenes and weaken that of light components in asphalt.
It can be seen in Figure 10c that the diffusion rate of the SBS modifier component of S-HV modified asphalt was higher than that of PG76-22 modified asphalt, which was due to the content of SBS modifier, indicating that the increase in modifier content increased molecular movement. Among them, saturates were greatly decreased at low temperatures. The order of diffusion rate of each component of S-HV modified asphalt was negatively correlated with that of molecular weight, which was lower than that of 70# asphalt at the same temperature, especially the light component, which greatly increased its durability. This showed that SBS modifier had a great influence on the diffusion rates of light components and higher modifier contents decreased the diffusion rates of light components in asphalt.

3.4. Solubility Law

Since physical and chemical reactions between asphalt and C-S-H gel often take place at room temperature, in order to simulate actual situations the surface concentration variations of C-S-H gel by components of different asphalt types were studied. The solubility of each asphalt component along the X direction was simulated under equilibrium state at 25 °C.
As shown in Figure 11, the solubility of saturates in asphalt near the surface of the C-S-H gel was the highest and there were small peaks and obvious aggregations. From the solubility curve of saturates, it was seen that the order from near to far from the surface of C-S-H gel at the highest peak was as follows: 70# asphalt, PG76-22 modified asphalt, and S-HV modified asphalt, which was proportional to the content of modifier.
As can be seen in Figure 12, a great similarity was observed between the aromatics solubility curves of 70# and S-HV modified asphalts after 10 Å. The solubility of aromatics in PG76-22 modified asphalt was high at both ends and low in the middle, while this was not the case for S-HV modified asphalt. This revealed that 4.27% modifier content had a greater effect on the solubility of aromatic phenols adsorbed onto the surface of C-S-H gel than that containing 11.8% modifier content, and an appropriate amount of modifier content could regulate the adsorption of aromatics and C-S-H gel.
As can be seen in Figure 13, the solubility curves of resins were mainly concentrated in the range of 20 to 30 Å. The order of the area surrounded by the solubility curve and along the direction of the X axis in the range of 0 to 10 Å was as follows: 70# asphalt < PG76-22 modified asphalt < S-HV modified asphalt, which corresponded to the amount of modifier. Addition of modifiers improved adsorption capacity between resins and C-S-H gel.
As shown in Figure 14, the solubility of asphaltenes in PG76-22 modified asphalt had the greatest difference from those of S-HV and PG76 modified asphalts. The maximum value of asphaltenes appeared in the range of 15 Å to 20 Å and the solubility of asphaltenes at both ends was low, indicating that asphaltenes presented aggregation behavior in the middle. Relatively speaking, the distribution of asphaltenes in 70# and S-HV modified asphalts was more uniform.

4. Conclusions

In order to study the adsorption performance of the interface between asphalt and C-S-H gel, three types of asphalt binder and C-S-H gel models were developed by MD. The effects of different asphalt components and temperatures on the adsorption performance of asphalt-C-S-H gel interface were analyzed. The following main conclusions were drawn.
(1) Adhesion work between different types of asphalt binder and C-S-H gel was in the following order: S-HV modified asphalt > PG76-22 modified asphalt > 70# asphalt, which was consistent with SBS modifier content. Adhesion work was mainly provided by Coulomb electrostatic force and the electrostatic interaction between asphalt and C-S-H gel surface was increased by the increase in temperature.
(2) The adsorption rates of the four components of 70# asphalt on the surface of C-S-H gel was in the following order: saturates > aromatics > resins > asphaltenes, which indicates that molecular weight affected the diffusion rate to some extent. The addition of SBS modifier weakened the diffusion rate of light components in asphalt and an increase in SBS modifier content decreased the diffusion rate of light components.
(3) From the saturate concentration curves of different types of asphalt at 25 °C, it was seen that the order from near to far from the surface of C-S-H gel at the highest peak was: 70# asphalt, PG76-22 modified asphalt, S-HV modified asphalt, which was proportional to SBS modifier content. The addition of an appropriate amount of SBS modifier could adjust the adsorption of aromatics and C-S-H gel and improved the adsorption of resins and C-S-H gel.

Author Contributions

B.H.: investigation and writing. W.H.: conceptualization, supervision, validation, and writing. J.Y.: software. Z.X.: validation. K.W.: conceptualization, funding acquisition, and resources. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This publication is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51908154, No. 51878193) and Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou (No. 201804010231). The authors would like to thank of the National Supercomputing Center in Shenzhen for their support with Materials Studio 7.0.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Xu Cai for his technical support and assistance in experimental activities.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.

References

  1. Bazzaz, M.; Darabi, M.K.; Little, D.N.; Garg, N. A Straightforward Procedure to Characterize Nonlinear Viscoelastic Response of Asphalt Concrete at High Temperatures. Transp. Res. Rec. 2018, 2672, 481–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bazzaz, M.; Darabi, M.K.; Little, D.N.; Garg, N. Effect of Evotherm-M1 on Properties of Asphaltic Materials Used at NAPMRC Testing Facility. J. Test. Eval. 2020, 48, 2256–2269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Darabi, M.K.; Huang, C.-W.; Bazzaz, M.; Masad, E.A.; Little, D.N. Characterization and validation of the nonlinear viscoelastic-viscoplastic with hardening-relaxation constitutive relationship for asphalt mixtures. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 216, 648–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Baghaee Moghaddam, T.; Karim, M.; Abdelaziz, M. A review on fatigue and rutting performance of asphalt mixes. Sci. Res. Essays 2011, 6, 670–682. [Google Scholar]
  5. Alkaissi, Z.A. Effect of high temperature and traffic loading on rutting performance of flexible pavement. J. King Saud Univ. Eng. Sci. 2020, 32, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Suo, Z.; Wong, W.G. Nonlinear properties analysis on rutting behaviour of bituminous materials with different air void contents. Constr. Build. Mater. 2009, 23, 3492–3498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fontes, L.P.T.L.; Trichês, G.; Pais, J.C.; Pereira, P.A.A. Evaluating permanent deformation in asphalt rubber mixtures. Constr. Build. Mater. 2010, 24, 1193–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Morea, F.; Agnusdei, J.O.; Zerbino, R. The use of asphalt low shear viscosity to predict permanent deformation performance of asphalt concrete. Mater. Struct. 2011, 44, 1241–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. An, S.; Ai, C.; Ren, D.; Rahman, A.; Qiu, Y. Laboratory and field evaluation of a novel cement grout asphalt composite. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2018, 30, 04018179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gong, M.; Xiong, Z.; Chen, H.; Deng, C.; Chen, X.; Yang, J.; Zhu, H.; Hong, J. Evaluation on the cracking resistance of semi-flexible pavement mixture by laboratory research and field validation. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 207, 387–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cai, X.; Huang, W.; Wu, K. Study of the self-healing performance of semi-flexible pavement materials grouted with engineered cementitious composites mortar based on a non-standard test. Materials 2019, 12, 3488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Mayer, J.; Thau, M. Jointless Pavements for Heavy-Duty Airport Application: The Semi-Flexible Approach; American Society of Civil Engineers: Reston, VA, USA, 2001; pp. 87–100. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hassan, K.; Setyawan, A.; Zoorob, S. Effect of cementitious grouts on the properties of semi-flexible bituminous pavement. In Proceedings of the 4th European Symposium on Performance of Bituminous and Hydraulic Materials in Pavement, Nottingham, UK, 11–12 April 2002; pp. 113–120. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ling, T.Q.; Zheng, X.W.; Ling, M.; Xiong, C.H.; Dong, Q. Research on performance of water-retention and temperature-fall semi-flexible pavement material. China J. Highw. Transp. 2010, 23, 7–11, 17. [Google Scholar]
  15. Liu, P.F.; Wang, D.W.; Otto, F.; Hu, J.; Oeser, M. Application of semi-analytical finite element method to evaluate asphalt pavement bearing capacity. Int. J. Pavement Eng. 2018, 19, 479–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Simone, A.; Mazzotta, F.; Eskandarsefat, S.; Sangiorgi, C.; Vignali, V.; Lantieri, C.; Dondi, G. Experimental application of waste glass powder filler in recycled dense-graded asphalt mixtures. Road Mater. Pavement Des. 2019, 20, 592–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Yang, B.; Weng, X. The influence on the durability of semi-flexible airport pavement materials to cyclic wheel load test. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 98, 171–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, J.; Cai, J.; Pei, J.; Li, R.; Chen, X. Formulation and performance comparison of grouting materials for semi-flexible pavement. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 115, 582–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ding, Q.J.; Sun, Z.; Shen, F.; Huang, S.L. The performance analysis of semi-flexible pavement by the volume parameter of matrix asphalt mixture. Adv. Mater. Res. 2010, 168–170, 351–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Setyawan, A. Asessing the compressive strength properties of semi-flexible pavements. Procedia Eng. 2013, 54, 863–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Husain, N.M.; Karim, M.R.; Mahmud, H.B.; Koting, S. Effects of aggregate gradation on the physical properties of semiflexible pavement. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2014, 2014, 529305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Yao, H.; Dai, Q.; You, Z. Molecular dynamics simulation of physicochemical properties of the asphalt model. Fuel 2016, 164, 83–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fallah, F.; Khabaz, F.; Kim, Y.-R.; Kommidi, S.R.; Haghshenas, H.F. Molecular dynamics modeling and simulation of bituminous binder chemical aging due to variation of oxidation level and saturate-aromatic-resin-asphaltene fraction. Fuel 2019, 237, 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sun, D.; Lin, T.; Zhu, X.; Tian, Y.; Liu, F. Indices for self-healing performance assessments based on molecular dynamics simulation of asphalt binders. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2016, 114, 86–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ding, Y.; Huang, B.; Shu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Woods, M.E. Use of molecular dynamics to investigate diffusion between virgin and aged asphalt binders. Fuel 2016, 174, 267–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xu, M.; Yi, J.; Feng, D.; Huang, Y.; Wang, D. Analysis of adhesive characteristics of asphalt based on atomic force microscopy and molecular dynamics simulation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 12393–12403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Gao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Gu, F. Molecular dynamics investigation of interfacial adhesion between oxidised bitumen and mineral surfaces. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 479, 449–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Corbett, L.W. Composition of asphalt based on generic fractionation, using solvent deasphaltening, elution-adsorption chromatography, and densimetric characterization. Anal. Chem. 1969, 41, 576–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kowalewski, I.; Vandenbroucke, M.; Huc, A.Y.; Taylor, M.J.; Faulon, J.L. Preliminary results on molecular modeling of asphaltenes using structure elucidation programs in conjunction with molecular simulation programs. Energy Fuels 1996, 10, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xu, G.; Wang, H. Molecular dynamics study of oxidative aging effect on asphalt binder properties. Fuel 2017, 188, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dong, Z.; Liu, Z.; Wang, P.; Gong, X. Nanostructure characterization of asphalt-aggregate interface through molecular dynamics simulation and atomic force microscopy. Fuel 2017, 189, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chu, L.; Luo, L.; Fwa, T.F. Effects of aggregate mineral surface anisotropy on asphalt-aggregate interfacial bonding using molecular dynamics (md) simulation. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 225, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Grudemo, A. Discussion of the structure of cement hydration compounds. In Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on the Chemistry of Cement, London, UK, 15–20 September 1952. [Google Scholar]
  34. Taylor, H.F.W. Proposed structure for calcium silicate hydrate gel. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1986, 69, 464–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hamid, S.A. The crystal structure of the 11 natural tobermorite Ca2.25[Si3o7.5(OH)1.5]·1H2O. Z. Für Krist. Cryst. Mater. 1981, 154, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bonaccorsi, E.; Merlino, S.; Taylor, H.F.W. The crystal structure of jennite, Ca9Si6O18(Oh)6·8H2O. Cem. Concr. Res. 2004, 34, 1481–1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Naber, C.; Kleiner, F.; Becker, F.; Long, N.-T.; Roessler, C.; Etzold, M.A.; Neubauer, J. C-S-H pore size characterization via a combined nuclear magnetic resonance (nmr)-scanning electron microscopy (sem) surface relaxivity calibration. Materials 2020, 13, 1779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Constantinides, G.; Ulm, F.-J. The effect of two types of C-S-H on the elasticity of cement-based materials: Results from nanoindentation and micromechanical modeling. Cem. Concr. Res. 2004, 34, 67–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mondal, P.; Shah, S.; Marks, L. A reliable technique to determine the local mechanical properties at the nanoscale for cementitious materials. Cem. Concr. Res. 2007, 37, 1440–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Constantinides, G.; Ulm, F.-J. The nanogranular nature of C–S–H. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 2007, 55, 64–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. DeJong, M.J.; Ulm, F.-J. The nanogranular behavior of C-S-H at elevated temperatures (up to 700 °C). Cem. Concr. Res. 2007, 37, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhu, W.; Hughes, J.J.; Bicanic, N.; Pearce, C.J. Nanoindentation mapping of mechanical properties of cement paste and natural rocks. Mater. Charact. 2007, 58, 1189–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Three-dimensional structure diagram of the four components of asphalt: (a) asphaltenes; (b) resins; (c) saturates; and (d) aromatics. Note: white atoms = H, black atoms = C, yellow atoms = S, blue atoms = N, red atoms = O.
Figure 1. Three-dimensional structure diagram of the four components of asphalt: (a) asphaltenes; (b) resins; (c) saturates; and (d) aromatics. Note: white atoms = H, black atoms = C, yellow atoms = S, blue atoms = N, red atoms = O.
Materials 14 04406 g001aMaterials 14 04406 g001b
Figure 2. Structure of unit cell of four-component asphalt.
Figure 2. Structure of unit cell of four-component asphalt.
Materials 14 04406 g002
Figure 3. SBS modifier molecular model.
Figure 3. SBS modifier molecular model.
Materials 14 04406 g003
Figure 4. Two molecular models of modified asphalt: (a) PG76-22 modified asphalt (SBS modifier parameters 4.27%); (b) S-HV (SBS modifier parameters 11.8%).
Figure 4. Two molecular models of modified asphalt: (a) PG76-22 modified asphalt (SBS modifier parameters 4.27%); (b) S-HV (SBS modifier parameters 11.8%).
Materials 14 04406 g004
Figure 5. SEM image of C-S-H [37].
Figure 5. SEM image of C-S-H [37].
Materials 14 04406 g005
Figure 6. The molecular model of C-S-H gel components. (a) H2O molecular model; (b) Ca+ ion model; (c) OH ion model; (d) Si3O10 molecular model.
Figure 6. The molecular model of C-S-H gel components. (a) H2O molecular model; (b) Ca+ ion model; (c) OH ion model; (d) Si3O10 molecular model.
Materials 14 04406 g006
Figure 7. The molecular model of C-S-H gel.
Figure 7. The molecular model of C-S-H gel.
Materials 14 04406 g007
Figure 8. Interface adhesion models for different asphalt types. (a) Model A (70# asphalt); (b) Model B (PG76-22 modified asphalt); (c) Model C (S-HV modified asphalt).
Figure 8. Interface adhesion models for different asphalt types. (a) Model A (70# asphalt); (b) Model B (PG76-22 modified asphalt); (c) Model C (S-HV modified asphalt).
Materials 14 04406 g008
Figure 9. Research methods and technical workflow.
Figure 9. Research methods and technical workflow.
Materials 14 04406 g009
Figure 10. Diffusion coefficients of asphalt samples with different SBS contents at different temperatures. (a) 70# asphalt; (b) PG76-22 modified asphalt; (c) S-HV modified asphalt.
Figure 10. Diffusion coefficients of asphalt samples with different SBS contents at different temperatures. (a) 70# asphalt; (b) PG76-22 modified asphalt; (c) S-HV modified asphalt.
Materials 14 04406 g010
Figure 11. Solubility distribution of saturates.
Figure 11. Solubility distribution of saturates.
Materials 14 04406 g011
Figure 12. Solubility distribution of aromatics.
Figure 12. Solubility distribution of aromatics.
Materials 14 04406 g012
Figure 13. Solubility distribution of resins.
Figure 13. Solubility distribution of resins.
Materials 14 04406 g013
Figure 14. Solubility distribution of asphaltenes.
Figure 14. Solubility distribution of asphaltenes.
Materials 14 04406 g014
Table 1. Detailed composition of three asphalt materials.
Table 1. Detailed composition of three asphalt materials.
Chemical Fractions70# AsphaltPG76-22 Modified AsphaltS-HV Modified Asphalt
Chemical FormulaNumber of MoleculesMass Fraction (%)Chemical FormulaNumber of MoleculesMass Fraction (%)Chemical FormulaNumber of MoleculesMass Fraction (%)
AsphaltenesC149H177N3O2S2119.74%C149H177N3O2S2118.89%C149H177N3O2S2117.41%
ResinsC59H85NOS324.07%C59H85NOS323.04%C59H85NOS321.23%
SaturatesC22H46514.54%C22H46513.92%C22H46512.83%
AromaticsC46H50S741.65%C46H50S739.87%C46H50S736.73
SBS C35H5614.27%C109H118111.80%
Table 2. Proportions of C-S-H gel composition.
Table 2. Proportions of C-S-H gel composition.
NameH2OCa+OHSi3O10
Crystal ratio8962
Mass ratio (%)12.0430.1217.0440.80
Table 3. Comparison of simulated and experimental results of the asphalt layer.
Table 3. Comparison of simulated and experimental results of the asphalt layer.
ProjectRelative DensitySolubility Parameter
Simulated value1.00/(J cm−3)1/2
Actual reference value1.02 ± 0.0222.59
Table 4. Adhesion work between three asphalt types and C-S-H gel.
Table 4. Adhesion work between three asphalt types and C-S-H gel.
Temperature (°C)−152565105
70#asphalt (kcal/mol)Evdw61.20272.1657.0363.34
Ecoulomb9932.609792.889789.7310,052.12
E9993.8119865.049846.7610,115.46
PG76-22 (kcal/mol)Evdw64.4591.36697.5288.83
Ecoulomb10,575.0310,442.4610,475.2510,576.89
E10,639.4910,533.8310,572.7710,665.72
S-HV (kcal/mol)Evdw51.9857.6842.8667.13
Ecoulomb11,352.9511,310.6011,418.1311,365.12
E11,404.9311,368.2811,460.9911,432.25
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hu, B.; Huang, W.; Yu, J.; Xiao, Z.; Wu, K. Study on the Adhesion Performance of Asphalt-Calcium Silicate Hydrate Gel Interface in Semi-Flexible Pavement Materials Based on Molecular Dynamics. Materials 2021, 14, 4406. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14164406

AMA Style

Hu B, Huang W, Yu J, Xiao Z, Wu K. Study on the Adhesion Performance of Asphalt-Calcium Silicate Hydrate Gel Interface in Semi-Flexible Pavement Materials Based on Molecular Dynamics. Materials. 2021; 14(16):4406. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14164406

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hu, Bei, Wenke Huang, Jinlou Yu, Zhicheng Xiao, and Kuanghuai Wu. 2021. "Study on the Adhesion Performance of Asphalt-Calcium Silicate Hydrate Gel Interface in Semi-Flexible Pavement Materials Based on Molecular Dynamics" Materials 14, no. 16: 4406. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14164406

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop