Next Article in Journal
Novel Hybrid Composites Based on PVA/SeTiO2 Nanoparticles and Natural Hydroxyapatite for Orthopedic Applications: Correlations between Structural, Morphological and Biocompatibility Properties
Next Article in Special Issue
Strategies for Improving Antimicrobial Properties of Stainless Steel
Previous Article in Journal
Biotribology of Synovial Cartilage: A New Method for Visualization of Lubricating Film and Simultaneous Measurement of the Friction Coefficient
Previous Article in Special Issue
Manipulation of TiO2 Nanoparticle/Polymer Coatings Wettability and Friction in Different Environments
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 13
Issue 9
10.3390/ma13092076
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Progressive Applications of Hyperbranched Polymer Based on Diarylamine: Antimicrobial, Anti-Biofilm and Anti-Aerobic Corrosion

by
Khalid I. Kabel
1,
Ahmed Labena
2,*,
Mohamed Keshawy
1 and
Wael N. Hozzein
3,4
1
Petroleum Applications Department, Egyptian Petroleum Research Institute (EPRI), Nasr City 11727, Cairo, Egypt
2
Processes Development Department, Egyptian Petroleum Research Institute (EPRI), Nasr City 11727, Cairo, Egypt
3
Bioproducts Research Chair, Zoology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
4
Botany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef 62511, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2020, 13(9), 2076; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13092076
Submission received: 8 April 2020 / Revised: 16 April 2020 / Accepted: 20 April 2020 / Published: 30 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Development of Mechanical, Corrosion Resistance, and Antibacterial Properties of Steels)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
New generations of hyperbranched aramids were synthesized from diarylamine and methyl acrylate using an AB2 monomer approach in a straightforward one-pot preparation. The chemical structure of hyperbranched Phenylenediamine/Methyl Acrylate HB(PDMA was confirmed by Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (1HNMR) spectroscopy. In addition, the particle’s size and distribution were recorded using Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS). Moreover, the synthesized HB(PDMA)s displayed broad-spectrum antimicrobial activities against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria as well as yeast strains and anti-biofilm activity where the highest activity was attributed to HB(PDMA)G4 at the lowest Minimum Inhibitory, Minimum Bactericidal, and Fungicidal Concentrations (MIC, MBC, and MFC, respectively). Furthermore, the HB(PDMA)s expressed anti-bacterial activity against isolated Pseudomonas sp. (R301) at a salinity of 35,000 ppm (NaCl). In addition, they revealed different corrosion inhibition efficiencies at the cultivated medium salinity at the estimated minimum bactericidal concentrations. The highest metal corrosion inhibition efficiencies were 59.5 and 94.3% for HB(PDMA)G4 at the Minimum Bactericidal Concentrations (MBCs) and two times Minimum Bactericidal Concentrations (2XMBCs), respectively, in comparison to both negative and positive controls.

1. Introduction

According to their unique chemical and physical properties, hyperbranched polymers (HBP)s have recently been of special interest [1], which can be attributed to their one-pot synthetic route on a large scale when compared to the multiple step synthetic-route of dendrimers. HBPs have low viscosity, good solubility, plentiful of functional groups, and a globular shape [2,3]. Furthermore, hyperbranched polymers have various applications in many fields [4] including chemistry, life science, biotechnology, and the petroleum industry. Their applications in the petroleum industry include demulsifiers [5], corrosion and scale inhibitors [6], oil spill dispersants [7], and asphaltene dispersants [8]. HBPs consist of a central core spread out to form a network of repeating branches ended by characteristic groups, which form an external surface of the polymeric nanoparticle. Their properties depend on the structural characteristics of the core, the branches, and the end-reactive groups [9]. Moreover, HBPs have promising merits as antimicrobial agents. It is highly remarkable that polymeric compounds with specific functional groups as thiols, amines, phenols, and esters have high potential to resist either fungal or bacterial Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial strains [10,11]. The polymerization routes, polycondensation, ring opining, or polyaddition have been used to synthesize HBPs such as aromatic polyesters, polyurethanes, and aromatic polyamides [12,13]. The polycondensation route of ABx monomers has been early proposed by Flory [14]. Furthermore, Gunatillake et al. reported the first preparation of hyperbranched polymer using such routes [15]. Afterward, the synthesis of hyperbranched aramid copolymers by direct polymerization and their properties as well as the effect of the monomer ratio on the mechanical properties were studied by Jikei et al. [16]. Kakimoto et al. [17] prepared hyperbranched aromatic polyamides of the AB2 monomer using direct polymerization and thermal methods. Recently, a commercial diamine and triacid were used to synthesize hyperbranched aramids, in addition to many new synthetic approaches that have been previously reported [18]. However, p-phenylenediamine is considered as one of the most investigated conducting polymers and has attracted much interest in many studies with various practical applications with relation to its high conductivity, outstanding air stability, and special physical–chemical properties compared with other conducting polymers [19]. Many phenylenediamines have been applied as corrosion inhibitors of mild steel [20,21]. It is well known that biocorrosion or Microbially-Influenced Corrosion (MIC) is affected by microbial activities, especially when the organisms are in contact with the metal surface to form a biofilm. Indeed, microbial cells are the building blocks of the biofilms and ease the attachment of cells with a metal surface, changing the electrochemical processes at their interface, thus referring to the extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) [22]. The objective of the present work was to synthesize hyperbranched polymer-aramids using the AB2 monomer approach, p-phenylenediamine, and methyl acrylate in three generations (G2, G3, G4) as an easy one-pot preparation. Moreover, the efficiency of the synthesized HB(PDMA)s were investigated as antimicrobial agents against Gram-positive, Gram-negative bacteria, and yeast strains, and as anti-biofilms (bacterial adhesion) agents. The HB(PDMA)s were evaluated as biocides and corrosion inhibitors against Pseudomonas sp. (R301) at a salinity of 35,000 ppm (NaCl).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

p-phenylenediamine (PD), methyl acrylate (MA), dimethylformamide (DMF), p-toluensulfonic acid (PTSA), tetrahydrofuran (THF) Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC) grade, and methanol were obtained from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and used without further purification. All other chemicals were reagent grade unless otherwise described.

2.2. Synthesis of Hyperbranched Phenylenediamine/Methyl Acrylate HB(PDMA)

In two necked flasks, 10.8 g (0.1 mol) of p-phenylenediamine (PD) was dissolved in 50 mL methanol, and a solution of 12 g (0.125 mol) of methyl acrylate (MA), dissolved in 20 mL of methanol, was added dropwise to the PD solution with continuous stirring under a nitrogen atmosphere for 4 h at 0 °C, and for 24 h at room temperature. The product was purified and evaporated in a vacuum oven at 40 °C to obtain the PDMA monomer. Then, 1.08 g (0.01 mol) of PD (as a core) was dissolved in 40 mL of DMF solvent at room temperature and placed in three necked flasks fitted with a thermometer, dean-stark with condenser, and dropping funnel. Then, 11.64 g (0.16 mol) of the prepared PDMA monomer was added with continuous stirring under a nitrogen atmosphere at 140 °C for 4 h in the presence of 0.1% PTSA (as a catalyst). The product was purified, and the solvent was evaporated in a rotary to obtain HB(PDMA)G2. The reaction was repeated using 23.28 g (0.32 mol) and 46.56 g (0.64 mol) of the PDMA monomer to obtain HB(PDMA)s G3 and G4, respectively. The reaction scheme is illustrated in Figure 1.

2.3. Characterization of the Prepared Hyperbranched Polymers

The chemical structures were recorded using a Nicolet iS10 FTIR spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) in a wavenumber range of 500–4000 cm−1. The 1HNMR spectroscopy was also recorded using a JEOL ECA-500 II spectrometer (500 MHz, JEOL Ltd. Co., Tokyo, Japan) with deuterated dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO-d6) as a solvent. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) was conducted to measure the particle size distribution by using a Zetasizer Nano ZS90 (Malvern Co., Malvern, UK) with a laser angle of 90° at 25 °C. Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) (Waters 515-2410, Waters, USA) was conducted on a GPC-Water 2410 at 40 °C with a refractive index detector using four columns of Styragel HR THF 7.8 × 300 mm, as calibrated by the Polystyrene Ready Cal Standards. The mobile phase was THF with a flow rate of 1 mL/min.

2.4. Antimicrobial Activity Test of the Synthesized HB(PDMA)s

2.4.1. Microbial Strain Standards

Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC® 29737™), Bacillus subtilis (ATCC® 6633™), Escherichia coli (ATCC® 8739™), and Candida albicans (ATCC® CRM10231™) were collected from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD, USA).

2.4.2. Microbial Media and Cultivation Conditions

The bacterial strains were cultivated and enumerated on Mueller Hinton Broth (MHB) or Mueller Hinton Agar (MHA) (Difco, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) at 37 °C with an incubation period of 24 h. Furthermore, Sabouraud Dextrose Broth (SDB) or Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (SDA) (Difco, Sparks, MD, USA) were used for the cultivation and enumeration of the Candida albicans strain at 30 °C for a period of incubation of 48 h.
The antimicrobial activity of the synthesized HB(PDMA)s G2, G3, G4 at a concentration of 10 millimoles (mM) were estimated using a method of agar well (10 mm) diffusion (as previously reported [23]) on MHA and SDA plates for the bacterial and the yeast strains, respectively. After overnight cultivation at 37 °C for the bacterial strains and 48 h at 30 °C for the Candida albicans strain, the biological activity was then evaluated by measuring the clearing zone’s diameter. All tests were performed three times, and the average values were recorded. Furthermore, sterile water was used as a negative control and standard antimicrobial agents’ Amoxicillin (100 ppm), Tetracycline (100 ppm), and Fluconazole (100 ppm) were used as positive controls.

2.4.3. Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MIC)s and Minimum Bactericidal/Fungicidal Concentrations (MBC/MFC)s of the Synthesized HB(PDMA)s

The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) “is defined as the lowest concentration of an antimicrobial agent that inhibits the development of visible microbial growth” [24]. However, the Minimum Bactericidal/Fungicidal Concentration (MBC/MFC) “is the lowest concentration of an antimicrobial agent required for killing 99% of the germ” [25]. The MICs were determined by the two-fold method in 96-well microtiter plates [26,27]. Briefly, the bacteria and yeast strains-inocula were prepared according to the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [28,29]. The bacterial and yeast strains were refreshed twice on MHB at 37 °C for an 18 h incubation period and on SDB at 30 °C for a 48 h incubation period, respectively, after 50% glycerol media reservation. The cultivated bacteria and yeast cells were checked for their purity using MHA and SDA, respectively. Then, the experimental bacterial inocula proceeded. After a purity check, 3–5 separate colonies were collected from the MHA plates and re-cultivated on 10 mL MHB at 37 °C for an overnight incubation period with continuous agitation at 200 rpm. Afterward, the overnight cultures were used as inocula for 10 mL MHB by adjusting their optical density (OD) to 0.2 at 550 mm. The 10 mL MHB cultures were further incubated at 37 °C for 3–4 h (i.e., until they achieved an OD550 of 1–2 under agitation of 200 rpm). Next, the MHB cultures were then diluted using fresh media until obtain an OD550 of 0.2. The experimental bacterial-inocula were readied by diluting the obtained cultivated cultures by 100 dilution folds (DF) and 1000 dilution folds for Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, respectively, to achieve bacterial counts of 1–2 × 108 CFU/mL (colony-forming unit/mL) for Gram-positive bacteria and 1–2 × 109 CFU/mL for Gram-negative bacteria, according to the CLSI [28]. The experiment yeast inoculum was then prepared. After a purity check, 3–5 cells were collected from the SDA plate and allowed to grow on 10 mL SDB at 30 °C for 24 h under continuous agitation at 200 rpm. Afterward, the cultivated cells were diluted by adjusting the OD to 550 to 0.2 according to the CLSI [29], which corresponded to the Candida albicans count of 5 × 106 CFU/mL. We serially diluted 100 µL of the synthesized HB(PDMA)s G2, G3, and G4 (at a concentration of 10 mM) using MHB for the bacterial strains and SDB for the yeast strain onto the micro-titer plates (Nunc GmbH & Co., Wiesbaden, Germany) and further inoculated them with 100 µL of the microbial suspension. There were two controls: positive (microbially inoculated without the synthesized HB(PDMA)s) and negative (only sterile media). After that, the micro-titer plates were incubated under aerobic conditions for an incubation period of 20 h at 37 °C for the bacterial strains and a 48 h incubation period for the Candida albicans strain at 30 °C. In order to visualize the results, 30 µL of 0.01% resazurin (HiMedia) solution was added to each well [30], and the plates were further incubated. The changing of the well’s color to pink indicates a reduction of resazurin (indicates microbial growth). MBC/MFC values of the synthesized HB(PDMA)s G2, G3, and G4 were estimated by taking 10 µL from the wells (before adding the resazurin indicator) that showed no visible growth and were further sub-cultured onto agar media (MHA, SDA plates) [31]. The agar plates were then incubated at 37 °C for 20 h for the bacterial species and at 30 °C for 48 h in the case of C. albicans (i.e., until growth was seen in the control plates). MBC/MFC values were defined as the corresponding concentrations of the synthesized HB(PDMA)s needed to indicate 99.5% killing.

2.5. Anti-Biofilms (Bacterial Adhesion) Activity of the Synthesized HB(PDMA)s and Minimum Biofilm Inhibitory Concentrations (MBICs) Detection

A semi-quantitative adherence assay on 96-well tissue culture plates was used to study the anti- biofilms (the bacterial adhesion of B. subtilis and E. coli) of the synthesized HB(PDMA)s G2, G3, and G4, as previously reported [32]. The bacterial inocula (100 µL) were prepared according to the CLSI method [30] and started with approximate concentrations of 1–2 × 108 CFU/mL and 1–2 × 109 CFU/mL for B. subtilis and E. coli, respectively. We serially diluted 100 µL of the synthesized HB(PDMA)s G2, G3, and G4 (supplemented with 1% Glucose) onto the micro-titer plates. The test was performed parallel with positive (inoculated well without the synthesized HB(PDMA)s) and negative (only sterile media) controls. The plates were then incubated for 20 h at 37 °C. The plates were further cleaned three times with 200 μL of 1× phosphate buffer saline (PBS) at pH 7.4, dried, fixed with ethanol, then subsequently stained with 0.1% Crystal Violet (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Afterward, the plates were washed again and further dried for 2 h [27]. The developed positive result appeared as purple rings that formed on the well’s bottom and side. The minimum biofilm inhibitory Concentrations (MBICs) were calculated as the lowest concentration of the synthesized HB(PDMA)s G2, G3, and G4 that inhibited the development of visible microbial growth adherence (biofilm) on MHB (supplemented with 1% Glucose) after an incubation period.

2.6. Antimicrobial Activity Test of the Synthesized HB(PDMA)s against Isolated Slime Forming Bacteria (SFB) Cultivated at High Salinity (35,000 ppm NaCl) and MIC/MBC Detection

Pseudomonas sp. was isolated from a formation water of the General Petroleum Company, Ras Gharib, Egypt on a Cetrimide Agar (Sigma-Aldrich, (St. Louis, MO, USA) at a salinity of 35,000 ppm (NaCl), purified, identified using 16S rRNA (data not shown), and deposited in GenBank (R301). The anti-bacterial activity of the synthesized HB(PDMA)s G2, G3, and G4 against the isolated SFB, Pseudomonas sp. (R301), at a salinity of 35,000 ppm was evaluated using the method of agar well (10 mm) diffusion as previously reported [23] on MHA at medium salinity (starting concentration of 10 mM). At the end of overnight cultivation at 37 °C, the clearing zone’s diameters were measured. All tests were performed three times, and the average values were recorded. The MIC values of the synthesized HB(PDMA)s G2, G3, and G4 were achieved by the micro-dilution method in 96-well microtiter plates as previously described [26,27]. The results were evaluated as above reported. MBC values of the synthesized HB(PDMA)s G2, G3, and G4 against isolated Pseudomonas sp. were estimated by taking 10 µL of the wells that showed no visible growth and were further sub-cultured onto the CA media at medium salinity. The agar plates were incubated at 37 °C for 20 h (i.e., until the growth was seen in the control plates). MBC values were defined as the corresponding concentrations of the synthesized HB(PDMA)s required for killing 99%.

2.7. Anti-Corrosion Activity of the Synthesized HB(PDMA)s

To evaluate the effect of the synthesized HB(PDMA)s G2, G3, and G4 as corrosion inhibitors for the cultivated Pseudomonas sp. (R301), a method was established using the batch experiments of the modified Nutrient Rich Simulated Seawater (NRSS) at medium salinity. The inocula for the corrosion experiment were enriched for 20 h at 37 °C using the CB media. The different reactors of HB(PDMA)s were established using mild steel coupons (AISI 1018 mild carbon steel strip measuring (1.5 cm × 1.5 cm × 0.32 cm) from COSASCO, Rohrback Cosasco Systems, Inc., Santa Fe Springs, CA, USA). The experiment was determined at MBC and 2XMBC for the isolated Pseudomonas sp. (R301) on the 12-well plates (Nunc GmbH & Co., Wiesbaden, Germany). Two control were performed in parallel to the corrosion and inhibition experiment: (i) the blank’s well (un-inoculated modified NRSS media) and (ii) the control’s well (inoculated with Pseudomonas sp. (R301) without the HB(PDMA)s). These mild steel coupons were first mechanically cleaned using emery papers of different grades, washed with distilled water and acetone, and then finally dried in a desiccator for further use. Furthermore, the weight loss was estimated (comparing the weight of the mild steel coupons before and after the experiment). From the weight loss results, the corrosion rate (g m−2 d−1) and the inhibition efficiency (%) of the metal corrosion were detected [33]. This experiment was then duplicated.
Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM, model Quanta 250 field emission gun, FEG, FEI company, Netherlands) at a magnification power of 25000×, and a gun with an acceleration voltage of 20 KV was used to confirm the corrosion inhibition efficiencies of the HB(PDMA)s at optimum concentrations against the isolated Pseudomonas sp. (R301) at a salinity of 35,000 ppm (NaCl). The mild steel coupons were obtained from the cultivated plate and directly washed with phosphate buffer saline (pH 7.4) for 5 min. Afterward, the coupons were fixed with a solution of 4% glutaraldehyde for 4 h and washed twice with PBS (5 min each), before washing with distilled water (5 min each). The coupons were then dehydrated using gradient concentrations of ethanol (25, 50, 75, and 100%) and kept dried in a desiccator.

3. Results

3.1. Synthesis and Characterization

The synthesized hyperbranched polymers showed good solubility in organic solvents like DMF and THF as well as in polar solvents like methanol and ethanol. The structure of the prepared hyperbranched polymers was confirmed by FT-IR, 1HNMR, and DLS.
The FTIR of the prepared HB(PDMA)s G2, G3, and G4 (see Figure 2) detected the appearance of peaks at 1648 cm−1 and 1557 cm−1, which can be attributed to –CONH; a broad peak at 3200–3600 cm−1 assigned to the primary and secondary amine; a strong band at 3000–2849 cm−1 for the CH alkanes; and bands at 1124 cm−1 and 1173 cm−1assigned to the –C–N– stretches [34].
The 1HNMR spectrum of HBPDMAG3 (see Figure 3, Figures S1 and S2), as a representative HB(PDMA) sample, showed signs of chemical shifts (δ, ppm, DMSO-d6) at 6.3–7.3 ppm corresponding to the aromatic protons; a singlet at 8.1 ppm corresponding to –NH proton; a singlet at 7.9 ppm attributed to –NH2; a singlet at 2.4–2.8 ppm corresponding to methylene groups; and a singlet at 3.5 ppm corresponding to –N–CH2 [35]. The prepared hyperbranched polymers G2, G3, and G4 had the same characteristic peaks.
The structure of a macromolecule can be widely studied by particle size and zeta potential [36]. The particle size distribution of the prepared HB(PDMA)s was measured by DLS and is illustrated in Figure 4a. The highly diluted solution of HB(PDMA) samples were dispersed in methanol, then in 2% diluted-distilled water with 0.01% HCl to protonate the terminal amine groups [29]. We could observe the particle sizes of HB(PDMA)s at.81.98, 93.86, and 107.1 nm of G2, G3, and G4, respectively. The branching number was increased by increasing the particle size. The zeta potential data are as shown in Figure 4b. was increased with increasing the number of branching leading to increasing the number of terminal amine groups as 35.8, 39.8, and 43.5 for HB(PDMA)G2, G3, and G4, respectively.
The molecular weights of the prepared HB(PDMA)s were determined by GPC. The concentrated solution of HBPDMA was dissolved in THF GPC grade, with a flow rate of 1 mL/min; the analysis achieved different molecular weights of Mn = 1820, 4300, and 9200 g mol−1.
The degree of branching (DB) “is one of the most characteristic parameters of hyperbranched polymers due to its correlation between the density of HBP structure and the number and position of the terminal groups.” DB is known as “the ratio of the molar fraction of branched and terminal groups relative to that of the total branching units” [37]. The AB2 polycondensation hyperbranched polymer is the most common type; buildings units may consist of initial (I), dendritic (D), terminal (T), and linear (L) units (see Figure 3). The calculation of the DB value can be estimated from the following equations [38,39]:
DB = (D+T)/(D+T+L)
If the degree of polymerization (BP) is high, the number of T units is near that of D units. So, the above equation can be simplified as Equation (2):
DB = 2D/(2D+L) = 1/(1+L/2D)
The DB of HBPs has been measured by direct and indirect approaches. The direct approaches include NMR spectroscopy measurements. Consider that the compound’s models are important and required to correctly assign the signals of L, D, and T units. The other one is the degradable method by chromatographic analysis, as described by Hawker [40] and Wooley [41], who used the degradable method to determine the DB of HBPs. Furthermore, the indirect viscometry method refers to the Mark–Houwink equation. [ η ] = K M v i s α can be used to detect the DB, depending on the difference between the HBPs and the linear polymer in their intrinsic viscosity ([η]) and molecular weight (Mvis) [42]. Obviously, the most common approach to detect the DB is by NMR spectroscopy. So, by using 1H NMR measurements, all the signals could be referred clearly to the T, D, and L units of the HB(PDMA)G3. The data recorded in Table 1 and illustrated in Figure 3 confirmed the structure and the calculated DB. The calculated values were in good agreement with HB(PDMA)G3 (DB = 66%).

3.2. Applications of the Synthesized HB(PDMA)s

In the present work, the HB(PDMA)s (Figure 1) were applied as broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents against standard microbial strains (two bacterial Gram-positive, one bacterial Gram-negative, and one yeast strains). The results (Table 2 and Figure S3) represented the broad antimicrobial activity of the synthesized HB(PDMA)s G2, G3, and G4 with the zone inhibitions ranging from 15.3–30.0 mm for the bacterial strains and 14.1–27.0 mm for the yeast strain in comparison to the positive control antimicrobial agents.
Overall, the HB(PDMA)s G2, G3, and G4 displayed antibacterial activity against both Gram-positive bacteria (20.0–30.0 mm) and Gram-negative bacteria (15.3–25.0 mm), as previously reported [43,44]. Moreover, the synthesized HB(PDMA)s G2, G3, and G4 showed inhibition activity against standard Gram-positive bacteria at lower MICs/MBCs ranging from 0.039–0.625/0.039–1.25 (mM) in comparison to Gram-negative bacteria (0.312–1.25/0.625–2.5 mM). Moreover, the synthesized HB(PDMA)s G2, G3, and G4 displayed MICs/MFCs ranging from 0.312–2.5/0.3212–2.5 mM. The highest antimicrobial activity effect of the HB(PDMA)s was attributed to HB(PDMA)G4 with inhibition zones of 28–30 mm, 25 mm, and 27 mm for the G+Ve, G−Ve, and candida strains, respectively, with the lowest MICs/MBCs and MICs/MFCs ranging from 0.039–0.078/0.039–0.156 mM, 0.312/0.625 mM, and 0.312/0.312 mM for the Gram-positive, for Gram-negative bacterial strains and yeast strain, respectively in comparison to HB(PDMA)G2 and HB(PDMA)G3 (Table 2 and Table 3). This result may be attributed to the number of branching as well as the increase in the functional groups and the bio-permeability action (size and molecular weight or lipophilic groups) [45].
The predicted mechanism of the broad antibacterial activity of HB(PDMA)s G2, G3, and G4 was related to the electrostatic interaction between the positively charged functional terminal-groups of HB(PDMA)s G2, G3, and G4 structure and the negatively charged bacterial surface phospholipid [46,47]. This interaction may slightly affect the cell’s selective permeability. Moreover, such interactions induce the protein’s denaturation of the membrane, leading to the destabilization of the cell membrane, leakage of the intracellular structure, and finally, the death of the bacterial cells [48]. Furthermore, the hypothesized antifungal activity of HB(PDMA)s G2, G3, and G4 was attributed to the electrostatic interaction between the cationic chain of the synthesized HB(PDMA)s and the negatively charged residues of the macromolecules of the fungal cell surface. This interaction induces leakage of intracellular electrolytes, which may alter the cell wall permeability and is essential to the enzyme system of fungal growth [11]. Overall, the effects of the functional group “p-phenylenediamine“ of HB(PDMA)s have been reputedly reported in many compounds as antimicrobial agents against bacteria and fungi [49,50].
Studies during the last century have provided substantial knowledge on microbial biofilms. Bacterial biofilms are considered as bacterial adhered or attached to biotic or abiotic surfaces, embedded in a complex (self-produced polymeric matrix), and they hard to eradicate with known biocides or antibiotics in comparison to their planktonic counterparts [51]. This may be due to their strong adherence to biotic or abiotic surfaces and/or their high resistance to antimicrobial agents. Therefore, one of the aims in this work was to study the anti-biofilm activity of HB(PDMA)s G2, G3, and G4 against the standard aerobic bacterial-developed biofilms of B. subtilis (ATCC 6633) and E. coli (ATCC 8739). The results reported in Table 4 display the minimum biofilm inhibitory concentrations (MBIC)s at a range of 5.0, 0.625, and 0.312 mM against B. subtilis developed biofilms and at a range of 5.0, 1.25, and 0.625 mM against E. coli developed biofilm for the synthesized HB(PDMA)s G2, G3 and G4, respectively. This result may be attributed to the number of branching, which reflects an increase in the reacted functional groups of the HB(PDMA)s, as previously reported [46,47]. This results in is agreement with the results reported by Labena and co-workers [27].
When bacterial biofilms develop on a metal, they present serious problems in the industry such as severe metal corrosion in comparison to their related planktonic counterparts. Therefore, one attempt of this work was to find a solution for the severity of microbial corrosion, especially those growing in a corrosive medium such as high salinity. Pseudomonas strains are Gram-negative, motile, rod-shaped bacteria, which are frequently observed in a marine-induced corrosion medium [52]. Many reports have focused on the importance of strains such as corrosive bacteria that have been cultivated and detected on carbon steels in a high salinity medium, which reflects severe damage and huge economic impacts [53,54,55]. Therefore, this work was to use the synthesized HB(PDMA)s G2, G3, and G4 as biocides and corrosion inhibitors for such corrosive bacteria at a high salinity medium of 35,000 ppm (NaCl). First, these synthesized compounds displayed antibacterial activity against the isolated and the enriched Pseudomonas sp. (R301) at a salinity of 35,000 ppm (NaCl) using the agar well diffusion method with the inhibition zones of 21, 40, and 44 mm for HB(PDMA)s G2, G3, and G4, respectively, in comparison to benzalkonium chloride (50 ppm) (see Table 5 and Figure S4).
The MIC/MBC results (Table 6) showed that the synthesized HB(PDMA)G4 had the lowest MIC/MBC values of 0.312/0.625 mM in comparison to HB(PDMA)s G2 and G3 with MIC/MBCs of 1.25/2.5, and 0.312/0.625 mM, respectively.
In order to examine the metal corrosion inhibition efficiency of these compounds on the carbon steels at the cultivated medium salinity, a batch experiment was developed. The results (Table 7 and Figure S5) displayed the mean metal corrosion rate for the blank wells (media with 35,000 ppm NaCl) and not-inoculated with Pseudomonas sp. R301) was 1.95 5 g m−2 d−1. These results can be attributed to the effect of the chemisorption of chloride ions on the metal. It has been reported that chloride anions can penetrate the oxide film that may have formed on the metal surface through pores or any defects. Then, they colloidally disperse or breakdown the formed oxide film and increase the permeability. Furthermore, when adsorbed on the metal surface, they favor hydration of the metal ions, increasing the corrosion probability and leading to pitting or crevice corrosion [56]. Moreover, such chloride anions can increase the metal corrosion rate by forming a self-perpetuating cycle, and the other free chloride acts as a corrosion catalyst. Equations (3)–(6) display the reactions between the mild steel and Cl2 ions [57]:
Fe → Fe2+ + 2e−
Fe2+ + 2H2O + 2Cl− →Fe(OH)2 + 2HCl
Fe(OH)2 + 3Cl− → FeCl3 + 2OH− + e−
FeCl + 3H2O → Fe(OH)3 + 3HCl
However, the mean corrosion rate for the control wells (media with 35,000 ppm NaCl) and inoculated with Pseudomonas sp. R301) was 1.5 g m−2 d−1, with a corrosion inhibition efficiency of 22.8%. This result can be attributed to the effect of the isolated Pseudomonas sp. R301 biofilm, which covered the metal surfaces and protected them from the severity of the corrosion caused by salinity, as previously reported [58,59,60]. When the synthesized HB(PDMA)s G2, G3, G4 at MBCs and 2XMBCs were applied in the wells; the metal corrosion rates were reduced by increasing the concentrations of the HB(PDMA)s. The highest metal corrosion inhibition efficiency of 81.5% was achieved at a concentration of 5 mM for HB(PDMA)G2. However, HB(PDMA)G3 at a concentration of 1.25 mM reduced the corrosion rate and displayed a metal corrosion inhibition efficiency of 92.8%. Moreover, HB(PDMA)G4 exhibited the highest metal corrosion inhibition efficiency of 94.3% at a concentration of 0.625 mM in comparison to HB(PDMA)G2 and HB(PDMA)G3. The explanation for the effect of the HB(PDMA)s was attributed to the chemisorption and potentiality of the synthesized compounds to form passive films at the metal–polymer interface, and these reactions depend on the type of interaction between the metal and the synthesized molecules. Furthermore, the ligation capability of such synthesized molecules to a metal substrate plays an important role, which depends on the number of electronic charges and the chelating or active atoms of the synthesized compounds. Moreover, the highest metal corrosion inhibition efficiency of the synthesized HB(PDMA)G4 was attributed to more active centers and the highest possible sites for adsorption on the metal surface [61,62,63].
The corrosion inhibition efficiencies of the synthesized HB(PDMA)s against the isolated and enriched Pseudomonas sp. (R301) at the concentrations of 2XMBCs were confirmed using SEM (Figure 5).

4. Conclusions

HB(PDMA)s at different generations (G2, G3, G4) were successfully synthesized using AB2 monomers (p-phenylenediamine and methyl acrylate) via one-pot preparation as a commercial synthesis method in order to improve the reliability of the synthesis. Furthermore, the chemical structure of the synthesized HB(PDMA)s were successfully confirmed by FTIR and 1HNMR spectroscopy. The particle size of the synthesized HB(PDMA)s was increased by increasing the molecular weights and the number of branching from G2, G3, and G4. The HB(PDMA)s were applied successfully as broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents against Gram-positive, Gram-negative bacteria and Candida albicans strains. The synthesized HB(PDMA)G4 displayed the highest antimicrobial activity at low MICs/MBCs compared with HB(PDMA)G3 and HB(PDMA)G2. Furthermore, the HB(PDMA)s expressed anti-biofilm activity at low MBICs. In addition, HB(PDMA)s showed anti-bacterial effect against isolated and enriched Pseudomonas sp. (R301) that was cultivated at a salinity of 35,000 ppm (NaCl). The highest activity was by the synthesized HB(PDMA)G4 in comparison to HB(PDMA)G3 and HB(PDMA)G2 at the lowest MIC/MBC values. The HB(PDMA)s successfully displayed metal corrosion inhibition efficiencies of 52.5 and 81.5% for HB(PDMA)G2, 56.9 and 92.8% for HB(PDMA)G3, and 59.5 and 94.3% for HB(PDMA)G4 at the MBCs and 2XMBCs, respectively, in comparison to the negative control (un-inoculated media with a salinity of 35,000 ppm NaCl) and the positive control (inoculated with Pseudomonas sp. (R301), without the HB(PDMA)s).

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/13/9/2076/s1, Figure S1: 1HNMR spectrum left shift of the synthesized HB(PDMA)G3, Figure S2: 1HNMR spectrum right shift of the synthesized HB(PDMA)G3, Figure S3: Photos show antimicrobial activity of the HB(PDMA)s at different generations (G2, G3, G4) against different standard microbial strains: (a) Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 29737), (b) Bacillus subtilis (ATCC 6633), (c) Escherichia coli (ATCC 8739), and (d) Candida albicans (ATCC 10231) using a modified agar well diffusion method, Figure S4: Photos display antimicrobial activity of the synthesized HB(PDMA)s against the isolated and enriched Pseudomonas sp. (R301) at a salinity of 35,000 ppm (NaCl), Figure S5: Photo documenting the anti-corrosion activity of the synthesized HB(PDMA)s against the isolated and enriched Pseudomonas sp. (R301) at a salinity of 35,000 ppm (NaCl).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.I.K. and A.L.; Methodology, K.I.K., A.L., and M.K.; Formal analysis, A.L., M.K., and W.N.H.; Investigation, K.I.K., A.L., and W.H.; Resources, K.I.K., W.N.H., and A.L.; Writing—original draft preparation, A.L., W.N.H., and M.K.; Writing—review and editing, K.I.K. and A.L.; Supervision, K.I.K., A.L., and W.N.H.; Funding acquisition, W.N.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors are grateful to the Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP-2019/53), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP-2019/53), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ghosh, A.; Banerjee, S.; Voit, B. Aromatic hyperbranched polymers: Synthesis and application. Adv. Polym. Sci. 2015, 266, 27–124. [Google Scholar]
  2. Wang, D.; Jin, Y.; Zhu, X.; Yan, D. Synthesis and applications of stimuli-responsive hyperbranched polymers. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2017, 64, 114–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Goseki, R.; Tanaka, S.; Ishizone, T.; Hirao, A. Living anionic polymerization of 1,4-divinylbenzene and its derivatives. React. Funct. Polym. 2018, 127, 94–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Caminade, A.-M.; Ouali, A.; Laurent, R.; Majoral, J.-P. Effects of Nanoconfinement on Catalysis; Springer International Publishing: Basel, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 173–207. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bi, Y.; Tan, Z.; Wang, L.; Li, W.; Liu, C.; Wang, Z.; Liu, X.; Jia, X. The demulsification properties of cationic hyperbranched polyamidoamines for polymer flooding emulsions and microemulsions. Processes 2020, 8, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Huang, H.; Yao, Q.; Liu, B.; Shan, N.; Chen, H. Synthesis and characterization of scale and corrosion inhibitors with hyper-branched structure and the mechanism. New J. Chem. 2017, 41, 12205–12217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Carpenter, K.M. Hyberbranched polymers as biocompatible oil dispersants: Influence of salinity, ph, and concentration on dispersion effectiveness. Master’s Thesis, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA, August 2016. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kabel, K.; Abdelghaffar, A.M.; Farag, R.; Maysour, N.; Zahran, M. Synthesis and evaluation of PAMAM dendrimer and PDPF-b-POP block copolymer as asphaltene inhibitor/dispersant. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2014, 41, 457–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Arkas, M.; Eleades, L.; Paleos, C.M.; Tsiourvas, D. Alkylated hyperbranched polymers as molecular nanosponges for the purification of water from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2005, 97, 2299–2305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ahmadi, Y.; Siddiqui, M.T.; Haq, Q.M.R.; Ahmad, S. Synthesis and characterization of surface-active antimicrobial hyperbranched polyurethane coatings based on oleo-ethers of boric acid. Arab. J. Chem. 2020, 13, 2689–2701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kanai, T.; Thirumoolan, D.; Mohanram, R.; Vetrivel, K.; Basha, K.A. Antimicrobial activity of hyperbranched polymers: Synthesis, characterization, and activity assay study. J. Bioact. Compat. Polym. 2015, 30, 145–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ruiz, J.A.R.; López, M.T.; García, F.C.; Garcia, J. Functional aromatic polyamides. Polymers 2017, 9, 414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Jiang, Y.; Loos, K. Enzymatic Synthesis of biobased polyesters and polyamides. Polymers 2016, 8, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Flory, P.J. Molecular size distribution in three dimensional polymers. VI. Branched polymers containing A—R—Bf-1type units. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1952, 74, 2718–2723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gunatillake, P.A.; Odian, G.; Tomalia, N.A. Thermal polymerization of a 2-(carboxyalkyl)-2-oxazoline. Macromolecules 1988, 21, 1556–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jikei, M.; Fujii, K.; Yang, G.; Kakimoto, M.-A. Synthesis and properties of hyperbranched aromatic polyamide copolymers from AB and AB2monomers by direct polycondensation. Macromolecules 2000, 33, 6228–6234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kakimoto, M.-A.; Grunzinger, S.J.; Hayakawa, T. Hyperbranched poly(ether sulfone)s: Preparation and application to ion-exchange membranes. Polym. J. 2010, 42, 697–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Liou, G.-S.; Lin, H.-Y.; Yen, H.-J. Synthesis and characterization of electroactive hyperbranched aromatic polyamides based on A2B-type triphenylamine moieties. J. Mater. Chem. 2009, 19, 7666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Park, Y.; Jung, J.; Chang, M. Research progress on conducting polymer-based biomedical applications. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Zhou, C.; Zhou, C.; Zhang, J. Investigation of corrosion resistance of poly(o-phenylenediamine)-ZnO composites on stainless steel. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2019, 14, 8173–8184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, J.-W.; Li, Y.; Ding, Y.-S.; Pan, K.-F.; Zhao, Q. Coatings corrosion resistance of poly(o-phenylenediamine) on mild steel in 3.5% NaCl: Influence of inorganic acid. JOM 2019, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Labena, A.; Hegazy, M.; Horn, H.; Müller, E. The biocidal effect of a novel synthesized gemini surfactant on environmental sulfidogenic bacteria: Planktonic cells and biofilms. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2015, 47, 367–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Deans, S.; Ritchie, G. Antibacterial properties of plant essential oils. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1987, 5, 165–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lv, Q.; Liu, M.; Wang, K.; Mao, L.; Xu, D.; Zeng, G.; Liang, S.-D.; Deng, F.; Zhang, X.; Wei, Y. Fabrication and biological applications of luminescent polyamidoamine dendrimers with aggregation-induced emission feature. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2017, 75, 292–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mims, C.A.; Playfair, J.H.L.; Roitt, I.M.; Wakelin, D.; Williams, R. Medical Microbiology Review; Mosby Europe: London, UK, 1993; pp. 1–34. [Google Scholar]
  26. Amsterdam, D. Antibiotics in laboratory medicine, 4th ed.; Williams & Wilkins: Baltimore, MD, USA, 1996; pp. 52–111. [Google Scholar]
  27. Labena, A.; Kabel, K.; Farag, R. One-pot synthesize of dendritic hyperbranched PAMAM and assessment as a broad spectrum antimicrobial agent and anti-biofilm. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2016, 58, 1150–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Approved standard M7-A6– Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Reference Method for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically; National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards: Wayne, PA, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  29. Approved Standard M27-A2– Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts; National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards: Wayne, PA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kumar, K.; Giribhattanavar, P.; Sagar, C.; Patil, S. A rapid and simple resazurin assay to detect minimum inhibitory concentrations of first-line drugs for mycobacterium tuberculosis isolated from cerebrospinal fluid. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2018, 12, 157–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Djais, A.I.; Tahir, H.; Hatta, M.; Achmad, H.; Wahyuni, A. Differences of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of moringa leaf extract (Moringa oliefera L.) on bacteria aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans and porphyromonas gingivalis. Ind. J. Pub. Heal. Res. & Devel. 2019, 10, 896–900. [Google Scholar]
  32. Labena, A.; Hegazy, M.A.; Sami, R.; Hozzein, W.N. Multiple applications of a novel cationic gemini surfactant: Anti-microbial, anti-biofilm, biocide, salinity corrosion inhibitor, and biofilm dispersion (Part II). Molecules 2020, 25, 1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Labena, A.; Hegazy, M.; Horn, H.; Müller, E. Cationic gemini surfactant as a corrosion inhibitor and a biocide for high salinity sulfidogenic bacteria originating from an oil-field water tank. J. Surfactants Deterg. 2013, 17, 419–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, Y.-T.; Zhang, Q.-P.; Xiao, F.; Zhou, Y. Graphene oxide promoted synthesis of p-phenylenediamine antioxidants. Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 2016, 86, 356–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Voit, B.I.; Lederer, A. Hyperbranched and highly branched polymer architectures—Synthetic strategies and Major characterization aspects. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 5924–5973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, X.; Guerrand, L.; Wu, B.; Li, X.; Boldon, L.; Chen, W.-R.; Liu, L. Characterizations of polyamidoamine dendrimers with scattering techniques. Polymers 2012, 4, 600–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jeon, I.-Y.; Noh, H.-J.; Baek, J.-B. Hyperbranched macromolecules: From synthesis to applications. Molecules 2018, 23, 657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Zhou, S.; Zhang, D.; Bai, L.; Zhao, J.; Wu, Y.; Zhao, H.; Ba, X. The synthesis of backbone thermo and ph responsive hyperbranched poly(bis(n,n-propyl acryl amide))s by RAFT. Polymers 2016, 8, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Zhang, Y.; Wang, B.; Zhang, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Wen, X.; Bai, L.; Wu, Y. Hyperbranched glycopolymers of 2-(α-d-mannopyranose) ethyl methacrylate and n,n’-methylenebisacrylamide: Synthesis, characterization and multivalent recognitions with concanavalin a. Polymers 2018, 10, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Kambouris, P.; Hawker, C.J. A versatile new method for structure determination in hyperbranched macromolecules. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 1993, 22, 2717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bolton, D.H.; Wooley, K.L. Hyperbranched aryl polycarbonates derived from A2B monomers versus AB2 monomers. J. Polym. Sci., Part A Polym. Chem. 2002, 40, 823–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zheng, Y.; Li, S.; Weng, Z.; Gao, C. Hyperbranched polymers: Advances from synthesis to applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 4091–4130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Xia, J.; Wang, W.; Hai, X.; Shuang, E.; Shu, Y.; Wang, J. Improvement of antibacterial activity of copper nanoclusters for selective inhibition on the growth of gram-positive bacteria. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2019, 30, 421–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yusof, N.A.A.; Zain, N.M.; Pauzi, N. Synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles with chitosan as stabilizing agent and their antibacterial properties against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Int. J. Boil. Macromol. 2019, 124, 1132–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Vasileva-Tonkova, E.; Staneva, D.; Medel, S.; Bosch, P.; Grozdanov, P.; Nikolova, I.; Grabchev, I. Antimicrobial, antibiofilm and cytotoxicity activity of a new acridine hyperbranched polymer in solution and on cotton fabric. Fibers Polym. 2019, 20, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhu, Y.; Ke, J.; Zhang, L. Racing for the Surface; Springer International Publishing: Basel, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 333–354. [Google Scholar]
  47. Rasines, B.; Hernández-Ros, J.M.; Cuevas, N.D.L.; Copa-Patiño, J.L.; Soliveri, J.; Muñoz-Fernández, M. Ángeles; Gómez, R.; De La Mata, F.J. Water-stable ammonium-terminated carbosilane dendrimers as efficient antibacterial agents. Dalton Trans. 2009, 40, 8704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Santos, M.R.E.; Fonseca, A.C.; Mendonça, P.; Branco, R.; Serra, A.C.; Morais, P.V.; Coelho, J.F.J. Recent developments in antimicrobial polymers: A review. Materials 2016, 9, 599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Salem, D.M.; Sallam, M.A.; Youssef, T.N. Synthesis of compounds having antimicrobial activity from alginate. Bioorg. Chem. 2019, 87, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Khan, I.M.; Ahmad, A.; Ullah, M.F. Synthesis, spectroscopic investigations, antimicrobial and DNA binding studies of a new charge transfer complex of o-p-phenylenediamine with 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid. Spectrochim Acta Part A Molec. & Biomol Spectro. 2013, 102, 82–87. [Google Scholar]
  51. Karami, P.; Khaledi, A.; Mashoof, R.Y.; Yaghoobi, M.H.; Karami, M.; Dastan, D.; Alikhani, M.Y. The correlation between biofilm formation capability and antibiotic resistance pattern in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Gene Rep. 2020, 18, 100561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ma, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, R.; Guan, F.; Hou, B.; Duan, J. Microbiologically influenced corrosion of marine steels within the interaction between steel and biofilms: A brief view. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 104, 515–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Xu, D.; Zhou, E.; Zhao, Y.; Li, H.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, D.; Yang, C.; Lin, H.; Li, X.; Yang, K. Enhanced resistance of 2205 Cu-bearing duplex stainless steel towards microbiologically influenced corrosion by marine aerobic Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2018, 34, 1325–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhao, Y.; Zhou, E.; Xu, D.; Yang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, T.; Gu, T.; Yang, K.; Wang, F. Laboratory investigation of microbiologically influenced corrosion of 2205 duplex stainless steel by marine Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm using electrochemical noise. Corros. Sci. 2018, 143, 281–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Jia, R.; Yang, D.; Xu, J.; Xu, D.; Gu, T. Microbiologically influenced corrosion of C1018 carbon steel by nitrate reducing Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm under organic carbon starvation. Corros. Sci. 2017, 127, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Abdolahi, A.; Hamzah, E.; Ibrahim, Z.; Hashim, S. Localised corrosion of mild steel in presence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm. Corros. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2015, 50, 538–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wang, Y.; Liu, C.; Wang, Y.; Li, Q.; Yan, B. Semi-empirical prediction model of chloride-induced corrosion rate in uncracked reinforced concrete exposed to a marine environment. Electrochim. Acta 2020, 331, 135376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ismail, K.; Jayaraman, A.; Wood, T.K.; Earthman, J.C. The influence of bacteria on the passive film stability of 304 stainless steel. Electrochimica Acta 1999, 44, 4685–4692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Labena, A.; Hegazy, M.; Horn, H.; Müller, E. Sulfidogenic-corrosion inhibitory effect of cationic monomeric and gemini surfactants: Planktonic and sessile diversity. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 42263–42278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Morsi, R.E.; Labena, A.; Khamis, E.A. Core/shell (ZnO/polyacrylamide) nanocomposite: In-situ emulsion polymerization, corrosion inhibition, anti-microbial and anti-biofilm characteristics. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2016, 63, 512–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Widyanto, B.; Chaerun, S.K.; Hartomo, W.A.; Rizki, I.N. Biocorrosion behavior of AISI 1006 carbon steel protected by biofilm of Bacillus subtilis by an iron-oxidizing bacterium and a sulfate-reducing bacterium. J. Bio- Tribo-Corrosion 2019, 6, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kabel, K.I.; Kamel, L.A.; Abou-shahaba, R.M.; El-Shenawy, A.E.; Shahen, S. Some water-soluble polymers as corrosion inhibitors for carbon steel in acidic medium. Al Azhar Bull Sci. 2017, 28, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  63. Salam, M.A.; Al-Juaid, S.; Qusti, A.; Hermas, A. Electrochemical deposition of a carbon nanotube-poly(o-phenylenediamine) composite on a stainless steel surface. Synth. Met. 2011, 161, 153–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 13 02076 g001 550
Figure 1. Reaction scheme of the synthesized HB(PDMA)s.
Figure 1. Reaction scheme of the synthesized HB(PDMA)s.
Materials 13 02076 g001
Materials 13 02076 g002 550
Figure 2. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrum of the synthesized HB(PDMA)s.
Figure 2. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrum of the synthesized HB(PDMA)s.
Materials 13 02076 g002
Materials 13 02076 g003 550
Figure 3. 1HNMR spectrum of the synthesized HB(PDMA)G3.
Figure 3. 1HNMR spectrum of the synthesized HB(PDMA)G3.
Materials 13 02076 g003
Materials 13 02076 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) images of the synthesized HB(PDMA)s G2, G3, and G4. (b) Zeta potential images of the synthesized HB(PDMA)s G2, G3 and G4.
Figure 4. (a) Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) images of the synthesized HB(PDMA)s G2, G3, and G4. (b) Zeta potential images of the synthesized HB(PDMA)s G2, G3 and G4.
Materials 13 02076 g004
Materials 13 02076 g005 550
Figure 5. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) images of the control (a); the metal surface with enriched Pseudomonas sp. (R301) at a salinity of 35,000 ppm (NaCl); the blank (b); the metal surface with a salinity of 35,000 ppm (NaCl); the synthesized HB(PDMA)s G2 (c); the synthesized HB(PDMA)s G3 (d); the synthesized HB(PDMA)s G4 (e) against the isolated and enriched Pseudomonas sp. (R301) at a salinity 35,000 ppm (NaCl) at the concentrations of 2XMBCs.
Figure 5. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) images of the control (a); the metal surface with enriched Pseudomonas sp. (R301) at a salinity of 35,000 ppm (NaCl); the blank (b); the metal surface with a salinity of 35,000 ppm (NaCl); the synthesized HB(PDMA)s G2 (c); the synthesized HB(PDMA)s G3 (d); the synthesized HB(PDMA)s G4 (e) against the isolated and enriched Pseudomonas sp. (R301) at a salinity 35,000 ppm (NaCl) at the concentrations of 2XMBCs.
Materials 13 02076 g005
Table
Table 1. The chemical shifts of Proton Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (1HNMR) for the synthesized HB(PDMA)G3 for the determination of D, L, and T units.
Table 1. The chemical shifts of Proton Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (1HNMR) for the synthesized HB(PDMA)G3 for the determination of D, L, and T units.
1H, ppmIntegration, mAssignmentFunctional Groups
8.10611.46D1–NH aromatic
8.10111.46T1
8.0811.46L1
7.3012.69D2H aromatic
7.2711.44D3
6.4241.56T2
6.3610.42L2
6.348.43L3
6.3312.44T3
3.5640.24T4–NH2 aromatic
3.5924.22D4–N–CH2
3.5851.15 WiesbadenL4
Table
Table 2. The antibacterial activity of the synthesized HB(PDMA)s G2, G3, and G4. The results are described as the mean of the inhibition zone diameters (mm).
Table 2. The antibacterial activity of the synthesized HB(PDMA)s G2, G3, and G4. The results are described as the mean of the inhibition zone diameters (mm).
CompoundsStaphylococcus aureus
(ATCC 29737)		Bacillus subtilis
(ATCC 6633)		Escherichia coli
(ATCC 8739)		Candida albicans
(ATCC 10231)
Mean Inhibition Zone (mm)*
HB(PDMA)G220.0 ± 0.817.3 ± 0.215.3± 0.414.1 ± 0.2
HB(PDMA)G327.0 ± 0.428.0 ± 0.424.8 ± 0.620.6 ± 1.2
HB(PDMA)G428.0 ± 0.830.0 ± 0.025.0 ± 0.027.0 ± 0.0
**AMC20.0 ± 0.017.0 ± 0.0--
TE--22.0 ± 0.0-
Flu---17.0 ± 0.2
*mm, millimeters. **AMC, Amoxicillin; TE, Tetracycline; Flu, Fluconazole (100 ppm).
Table
Table 3. The Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs), Minimum Bactericidal Concentrations (MBCs), and Minimum Fungicidal Concentrations (MFCs) of HB(PDMA)s against different standard microbial strains.
Table 3. The Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs), Minimum Bactericidal Concentrations (MBCs), and Minimum Fungicidal Concentrations (MFCs) of HB(PDMA)s against different standard microbial strains.
CompoundsStaphylococcus aureus
(ATCC 29737)		Bacillus subtilis
(ATCC 6633)		Escherichia coli
(ATCC 8739)		Candida albicans
(ATCC 10231)
MIC
*(mM)		MBC
(mM)		MIC
(mM)		MBC
(mM)		MIC
(mM)		MBC
(mM)		MIC
(mM)		MFC
(mM)
HB(PDMA)G20.6251.250.6251.251.252.52.52.5
HB(PDMA)G30.0780.1560.1560.6250.6251.250.6250.625
HB(PDMA)G40.0390.0390.0780.1560.3120.6250.3120.312
* mm, millimoles.
Table
Table 4. The Minimum Biofilm Inhibitory Concentrations (MBICs) of HB(PDMA)s against different standard bacterial biofilms.
Table 4. The Minimum Biofilm Inhibitory Concentrations (MBICs) of HB(PDMA)s against different standard bacterial biofilms.
CompoundsBacillus subtilis
(ATCC6633)		Escherichia coli
(ATCC 8739)
MBIC (mM)MBIC (mM)
HB(PDMA)G25.05.0
HB(PDMA)G30.6251.25
HB(PDMA)G40.3120.625
Table
Table 5. The antibacterial activity of HB(PDMA)s against isolated Pseudomonas sp. (R301) at 35,000 ppm (NaCl).
Table 5. The antibacterial activity of HB(PDMA)s against isolated Pseudomonas sp. (R301) at 35,000 ppm (NaCl).
CompoundsPseudomonas sp. (R301)
Mean Inhibition Zone (mm)
HB(PDMA)G220.6 ± 0.4
HB(PDMA)G340.0 ± 0.0
HB(PDMA)G444.0 ± 0.8
Benzalkonium chloride (50 ppm)32.0 ± 0.0
Table
Table 6. The MICs and MBCs of HB(PDMA) against isolated Pseudomonas sp. (R301) at 35,000 ppm NaCl.
Table 6. The MICs and MBCs of HB(PDMA) against isolated Pseudomonas sp. (R301) at 35,000 ppm NaCl.
CompoundsPseudomonas sp. (R301)
MIC
(mM)		MBC
(mM)
HB(PDMA)G21.252.5
HB(PDMA)G30.3120.625
HB(PDMA)G40.3120.625
Table
Table 7. The corrosion rate and inhibition efficiency (%) of HB(PDMA) at the MBCs and 2XMBCs of the isolated Pseudomonas sp. (R301) at 35,000 ppm (NaCl) in comparison to the blank.
Table 7. The corrosion rate and inhibition efficiency (%) of HB(PDMA) at the MBCs and 2XMBCs of the isolated Pseudomonas sp. (R301) at 35,000 ppm (NaCl) in comparison to the blank.
SamplesConcentration
(mM)		Mean Corrosion Rate
(g m−2 d−1)		Inhibition Efficiency
(%)
Blank-1.95 ± 0.030
Control-1.5 ± 0.1022.8
HB(PDMA)G22.50.92 ± 0.0552.8
HB(PDMA)G25.00.36 ± 0.0181.5
HB(PDMA)G30.6250.83 ± 0.0557.4
HB(PDMA)G31.250.14 ± 0.00592.8
HB(PDMA)G40.3120.79 ± 0.0259.5
HB(PDMA)G40.6250.11 ± 0.0294.3

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kabel, K.I.; Labena, A.; Keshawy, M.; Hozzein, W.N. Progressive Applications of Hyperbranched Polymer Based on Diarylamine: Antimicrobial, Anti-Biofilm and Anti-Aerobic Corrosion. Materials 2020, 13, 2076. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13092076

AMA Style

Kabel KI, Labena A, Keshawy M, Hozzein WN. Progressive Applications of Hyperbranched Polymer Based on Diarylamine: Antimicrobial, Anti-Biofilm and Anti-Aerobic Corrosion. Materials. 2020; 13(9):2076. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13092076

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kabel, Khalid I., Ahmed Labena, Mohamed Keshawy, and Wael N. Hozzein. 2020. "Progressive Applications of Hyperbranched Polymer Based on Diarylamine: Antimicrobial, Anti-Biofilm and Anti-Aerobic Corrosion" Materials 13, no. 9: 2076. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13092076

APA Style

Kabel, K. I., Labena, A., Keshawy, M., & Hozzein, W. N. (2020). Progressive Applications of Hyperbranched Polymer Based on Diarylamine: Antimicrobial, Anti-Biofilm and Anti-Aerobic Corrosion. Materials, 13(9), 2076. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13092076

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop