Next Article in Journal
Improvement of White Spruce Wood Dimensional Stability by Organosilanes Sol-Gel Impregnation and Heat Treatment
Next Article in Special Issue
Outstanding Tensile Properties and Their Origins in Twinning-Induced Plasticity (TWIP) Steels with Gradient Substructures
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis of Silver-Coated Bioactive Nanocomposite Scaffolds Based on Grafted Beta-Glucan/Hydroxyapatite via Freeze-Drying Method: Anti-Microbial and Biocompatibility Evaluation for Bone Tissue Engineering
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dilatometric Study of Phase Transformations in 5 Mn Steel Subjected to Different Heat Treatments
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Effects of Silicon Content and Tempering Temperature on the Microstructural Evolution and Mechanical Properties of HT-9 Steels

Materials 2020, 13(4), 972; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13040972
by Junkai Liu 1, Wenbo Liu 1, Zhe Hao 1, Tiantian Shi 1, Long Kang 2, Zhexin Cui 1 and Di Yun 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Materials 2020, 13(4), 972; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13040972
Submission received: 17 January 2020 / Revised: 17 February 2020 / Accepted: 19 February 2020 / Published: 21 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments to the Author:
The authors of this paper designed two kinds of HT-9 experimental steels to investigate how the Si content and the tempering temperature affect the mechanical properties of these experimental steels. It is an interesting investigation, however, some details may be considered by the authors:

 

Introduction

COMMENT: Page 1, line 34: I suggest the authors to add more recent references.

COMMENT: Page 2, line 44: More recent references could be added.

 

Results

COMMENT: Page 4, line 119: The lack of difference between different samples could be further discussed.

COMMENT: Page 6, line 119: This difference from the results of other researchers may be further commented.

 

The reported data are discussed and commented and the results support the authors conclusions. Therefore, I think that this paper is suitable for publication.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,

I found your work interesting and clearly-exposed.

Best Regards.

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

I am greatly indebted to you for your review!

Best regards.

Reviewer 3 Report

[20, 27] - template, no systematics,
What is Fig. 1 for?
Figs. 1, 9, 10.
Illegible scales.
Fig. 3 - illegible graduations and markings,
in 2 # (0.42Si) steel sample - 0.42 Si ...,
no phase marks on some Figs.
Hardly legible phase markings on some Figs.
100nm - 100 nm,
Conclusion 2 is poorly represented in paper.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Back to TopTop