Next Article in Journal
The Antibacterial Efficacy and In Vivo Toxicity of Sodium Hypochlorite and Electrolyzed Oxidizing (EO) Water-Based Endodontic Irrigating Solutions
Previous Article in Journal
Fused Deposition Modeling of Poly (lactic acid)/Macadamia Composites—Thermal, Mechanical Properties and Scaffolds
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Self-Sensing Carbon Nanotube Composites Exposed to Glass Transition Temperature

1
Civil and Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering, Hanyang University ERICA, Ansan, Gyeonggi-do 15588, Korea
2
Civil and Coastal Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon PL7 8AA, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2020, 13(2), 259; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13020259
Submission received: 9 December 2019 / Revised: 6 January 2020 / Accepted: 6 January 2020 / Published: 7 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Advanced Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology)

Abstract

:
This paper reported the effect of high temperature on the electro-mechanical behavior of carbon nanotube (CNT) reinforced epoxy composites. CNT/epoxy composites were fabricated by dispersing CNTs in the epoxy matrix using a solution casting method. Electrical conductivity measurements obtained for the CNT/epoxy composites indicated a steadily increasing directly proportional relationship with CNT concentration with a percolation threshold at 0.25 wt %, reaching a maximum of up to 0.01 S/m at 2.00 wt % CNTs. The electro-mechanical behavior of CNT/epoxy composites were investigated at a room temperature under the static and cyclic compressive loadings, resulting that the change in resistance of CNT/epoxy composites was reduced as increasing CNT concentration with good repeatability. This is due to well-networked CNTs conducting pathways created within the solid epoxy matrix observed by scanning electron microscopy. Temperature significantly affects the electro-mechanical behavior of CNT/epoxy composites. In particular, the electro-mechanical behavior of CNT/epoxy composites below the glass transition temperature showed the similar trend with those at room temperature, whereas the electro-mechanical behavior of CNT/epoxy composites above the glass transition temperature showed an opposite change in resistance with poor repeatability due to unstable CNT network in epoxy matrix.

1. Introduction

In recent years, carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have attracted considerable interest for many industrial applications [1,2,3]. CNTs possess excellent mechanical, electrical, electronic, optical, chemical and thermal properties, which, when combine with their very high aspect ratio and large surface area, have made them an excellent candidate for smart composite materials [4,5,6,7]. In this context, CNT reinforced composite materials have been investigated for smart composite applications such as for gas detection [8], structural integrity self–sensing [9] and actuators [10]. Unlike conventional materials, CNT reinforced composites have many advantages such as being relatively light in weight, having good corrosion resistance and waterproofing, and with the potential for self-sensing applications. For example, Ku-Herrera et al. [11] studied the strain sensitivity of nanocomposites containing a small amount of CNTs. They found that the mechanical properties of the nanocomposite were improved during compression testing reaching a maximum value, in terms of gauge factor, at 0.3 wt % of CNT content. Ayatollahi et al. [12] investigated the effect of CNT concentration on the mechanical and electrical properties of CNTs/epoxy nanocomposite. They found that both of the mechanical and electrical properties were improved especially for a 1.0 wt % CNTs.
The strain sensing capability of CNT nanocomposites is considered to be a key requirement for future structural health monitoring techniques and applications. To overcome these problems and requirements, some studies have tried to develop novel self-sensing nanocomposites for these types of applications [13,14,15,16,17]. Bouhamed et al. [6] fabricated a CNT/epoxy nanocomposite and focused on the behavior of the nanocomposite under strain applications. The results showed a higher changing in resistance happen at low CNTs concentration and the strain sensitivity at this content was 14.19. In addition, Dinh et al. [18] investigated the behavior of adding CNTs to epoxy when fabricating a self-sensing nanocomposite structure. They found that for an applied and stepped changed cyclic pressure, the electrical resistance of the structure increased with increasing pressure and decreased with decreasing pressure. During room temperature, testing the nanocomposite structure remained stable and showed excellent reproducible results. Shen et al. [7] studied changes in electrical resistance of self-sensing CNTs in epoxy nanocomposite during compression testing. They observed that when the compression load increased the electrical resistance of the nanocomposite decreased, thus, indicating that it exhibited a measurable piezoresistive effect.
The effect of temperature on CNT reinforced composites has been studied for different filler-resin composites. Gojny and Schulte [19] investigated the effect of multi-walled CNTs on the thermo-mechanical properties of MWCNT/epoxy composites and found that increasing concentrations of MWCNTs as well as functionalizing MWNCTs leads to an increase of the glass transition temperature with higher interfacial interaction between the CNT and the polymer matrix. Godara et al. [20] reported that CNT reinforced epoxy/carbon fiber composites showed significant decrease in thermal expansion and increase in fracture toughness Mode-1. However, although previous researchers have investigated material properties of CNT reinforced composites, they did not consider the effect of glass transition temperature on the electro-mechanical behavior of CNT reinforced composite materials, which is critical parameter for real structural health monitoring application, and is described here for the first time. This omission leaves a gap in our understanding of the phenomena, since we know that when the temperature increases, the stiffness of the combined matrix and CNTs is likely to decrease due to its nature of polymer. Under these conditions, the electrical resistance of the CNTs themselves may also change due to unstable CNT network. The extent of these changes remains largely unknown. Therefore, in this study, we investigated the temperature dependence of the electro-mechanical behavior of CNT/epoxy composites.

2. Materials and Methods

A filler material used for the CNT/epoxy composite was high purity (>95.0 wt %) and chemical vapor deposition grown multi-walled carbon nanotubes from US Research Nanomaterials Inc. (Houston, TX, USA). The average diameter and length of CNTs were 4–10 nm and 50 µm, respectively. A low viscosity epoxy resin type (IN2 Epoxy Infusion Resin) combined with a hardener (AT30 slow) were obtained from Easy Composite (Stoke-on-Trent, UK). The viscosity of the matrix resin was 200–450 mPas and a pot life was 80–100 min at a room temperature. The solvent used for dispersion of CNTs was high purity of acetone (> 95%) supplied by Acros Organics Ltd (Loughborough, UK).
The CNT/epoxy composites were fabricated by uniformly dispersing the CNTs in the epoxy matrix as described in authors’ previous studies [21,22,23]. Firstly, various concentrations of the CNTs (0–2.5 wt %) were weighed out and mixed in 60 mL of acetone in a beaker. A high intensity and high frequency horn-type ultrasonicator (BR-20MT-10L, 1000 W) was used to ensure full and uniform dispersion of the CNTs in the epoxy resin. This approach was used to negate the van der Waals forces that exist between the CNTs and which tend to make them clump together. In this study, the ultrasonicator operated in an ice bath in the pulsed mode (45 s on and 15 s off) for 30 min to minimize any overheating effect. Following sonication of the CNTs, a weighed amount of epoxy resin was added to the mixture and dispersed again using the ultrasonicator for another 5 minutes. The fully dispersed mixture was then placed in an oven at 70 °C for 24 h to evaporate the acetone. Once evaporation was completed, the hardener (AT30) was added, with a mix ratio of 100:30, and thoroughly mixed for a further 5 min. The mixture was then degassed for 20 min in a vacuum chamber to remove any damaging air bubbles from the mixture. The mixture produced in this way was then cast in a mold to produce the desired specimen configuration needed for testing. Finally, the mixture was cured 24 h at room temperature and then for a further 24 h post cure at 60 °C to ensure the full completion of the cure process. All samples were cut into 25 mm diameter cylinder with 20 mm in height for the electro-mechanical response of CNT/epoxy composites.
A fracture surface of the specimen was observed using a scanning electron microscope (JEOL JSM-7001F, Tokyo, Japan) at 30 kV to assess the dispersion of CNTs in the matrix. The samples were coated with a thin gold film using sputter coating (QUORUM-Q150TES, Laughton, UK) for 10 min. For the electrical conductivity, two different multimeters (Keithley 6517B for high resistance and Keithley 2700 for nominal resistance) was used to record resistance. To minimize measurement errors due to the contact resistance between the tip of test probe, both electrodes of the specimen was painted with high purity silver, eliminating an issue for the contact resistance to use two-probe method. Two-probe method was applied for the measurement of the electrical resistance for our specimens because of simple experiment. The electrical conductivity (σ) of samples was calculated using Equation (1).
σ = L A R
where R is the electrical resistance of the sample, A and L are a cross-sectional area and the length of the samples, respectively. The compression testing of the specimens was carried out using a universal testing machine (Instron 5582, Norwood, MA, USA). In order to investigate the effect of temperature on the electromechanical behavior of the specimens, the static and cyclic compressive loading was applied to the specimens at a displacement control of 0.5 mm/min. Temperature was controlled by placing the specimens in a heater box, as shown in Figure 1. Prior to testing, the specimens were hold for 1 h for uniform temperature distribution. During the static and cyclic loading, the change in resistance of the specimens was recorded using Keithley 2700 with 7700 data acquisition (DAQ) system.

3. Results

Figure 2a showed the electrical conductivity for the CNT/epoxy nanocomposites as a function of CNT concentrations. Pure epoxy is non-conductive materials with 1 × 10−14 S/m. A significant increase in the electrical conductivity was observed when the concentration of CNTs increased from 0.2 wt % to 0.5 wt %, indicating a percolation threshold. Thereafter, the electrical conductivity gradually increased up to 2.5 wt % CNTs. The percolation threshold, i.e., the minimum CNT content in the matrix after which no significant change in the electrical conductivity is observed, occurred at around 0.25 wt % CNTs. The observed increased in electrical conductivity of the CNT/epoxy composite is due to a well-developed CNT network structure (conducting pathways) created within the matrix material as shown in Figure 3. The effectiveness of electron transfer between the CNTs is very highly dependent on this CNTs spacing distance. In this study, the maximum electrical conductivity of CNT/epoxy composite reached was 5.25 × 10−2 S/m at 2.5 wt % CNTs. The experimental data were also analyzed using a percolation theory, σ = σ 0 ( p p c ) t , σ 0 is a parameter depending on the electrical conductivity of CNT, p is the volume fraction of CNTs, p c is the volume fraction corresponding to the percolation threshold, t is the critical exponent, as shown in Figure 2b, where p c and t are 2.34 and 2.0, respectively. Note that the value of t obtained proves that the CNT networks are deformed as a three-dimensional aspect inside the nanocomposite matrix.
The electro-mechanical response of CNT/epoxy composites was investigated under both static and cyclic compressive loadings. Figure 4a showed the change in resistance of CNT/epoxy composites under the static compressive loadings at room temperature. It can be clearly seen that the resistance of all specimens decreased with increasing compressive loading with nonlinear behavior. Additionally, the piezo-resistive behavior of CNT/epoxy composites is similar to that observed by Yin et al. [24], which significantly depends on CNT concentration. A higher CNT content lead to a smaller resistance change during the compressive loadings. This could be due to the fact that increasing CNTs concentration reduces the inter-particle distance between adjacent CNTs, thus allowing the potential for greater possible contact between them under that compressive loading. Figure 4b,c showed the change in resistance of the CNT/epoxy composites under cyclic compressive loadings within elastic region at the room temperature. The resistance changes for the specimen showed excellent correspondence with the changes in the applied compressive strain. It was also observed that CNT/epoxy composite with higher CNT concentration provides lower strain sensitivity under the cyclic compressive loadings.
Temperature generally affects the materials properties of CNT reinforced composite [25,26,27]. Figure 5 showed the influence of temperature on the change in resistance of CNT/epoxy composites at rest. All CNT/epoxy composites presented a positive temperature coefficient, where the resistance of all samples increased at elevated temperature. The positive temperature coefficient for CNT/epoxy composites can be explained by the rearrangement of CNT network brought about by the volumetric expansion of epoxy matrix as the temperature rises. It can be noted that the change, with temperature, in the normalized resistance for the sample with the highest CNT concentration is smaller than for the low CNT. This behavior can be associated with the better stability of CNT network structure, associated with the higher CNTs concentrations, facilitating better electron transfer through the inter-particle channels [28].
Although there has been much research on the effect of temperature on electrical properties of carbon nanotube reinforced composites at rest, there has been no research on the electro-mechanical behavior of those materials under the different temperatures. Therefore, we studied the electro-mechanical behavior of CNT/epoxy composite with 65 °C of the glass transition temperature [29] under static as well as cyclic compressive loadings. Figure 6a showed the change in resistance of 1.0 wt % CNT/epoxy composites under the static compressive loading at various temperatures. It was observed that the resistance behavior of samples varies with applied temperature. The specimens exposed to 20–60 °C showed the similar electro-mechanical behavior during the static compressive loading, whereas the specimen with 70 °C showed significant reduction in resistance compared to those with 20–60 °C and the specimen with 80 °C showed the increase in resistance which is an opposite trend with the samples with 20–60 °C. Figure 6b showed the electro-mechanical behavior of CNT/epoxy composites under the cyclic compressive loadings. For specimens tested between 20–60 °C, the resistance change observed remained remarkably consistent in nature during the cyclic compressive loadings. However, above this temperature range, those tested in 70 and 80 °C exhibited a different resistance response with poor repeatability, which is not applicable for repeatable sensing application. Considering their glass transition temperature (Tg) of 65 °C, Tg significantly affects the electro-mechanical response of CNT/epoxy composites. It can be speculated, shown in the Figure 7, that the irreversible volumetric change of CNT/epoxy composite due to Tg would increase in the inter-distance between CNTs and thus regenerate CNT network, destroying conductive pathways and thus increasing resistance under the compressive loadings.

4. Conclusions

The present study investigated the electro-mechanical behavior of carbon nanotube reinforced epoxy composites at various temperature. It was found that temperature significantly affects the electro-mechanical behavior of CNT/epoxy composites. In particular, the CNT/epoxy composites exposed to above glass transition temperature showed an opposite and unrepeatable electro-mechanical behavior under the compressive loadings compared to those exposed to below glass transition temperature. CNT/epoxy composites may enable potential applications to sensors and sensor-integrated materials. However, the influence of temperature on the electro-mechanical behavior for CNT/epoxy composite must be considered.

Author Contributions

S.-H.J. conceived, designed, and performed all experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper and supervised the overall research. L.-Y.L. discussed the research. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Korean Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement (KAIA) grant funded by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (19CTAP-C151808-01) in South Korea.

Acknowledgments

The author acknowledges any support of Mohammed Al-Bahrani for sample preparation and experiments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Peng, H.; Li, Q.; Chen, T. Industrial Applications of Carbon Nanotubes; William Andrew: Norwich, NY, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  2. De Volder, M.F.; Tawfick, S.H.; Baughman, R.H.; Hart, A.J. Carbon nanotubes: Present and future commercial applications. Science 2013, 339, 535–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Paradise, M.; Goswami, T. Carbon nanotubes—Production and industrial applications. Mater. Des. 2007, 28, 1477–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Costa, P.; Silva, J.; Ansón-Casaos, A.; Martinez, M.T.; Abad, M.J.; Viana, J.; Lanceros-Méndez, S. Effect of carbon nanotube type and functionalization on the electrical, thermal, mechanical and electromechanical properties of carbon nanotube/styrene–butadiene–styrene composites for large strain sensor applications. Compos. Part B Eng. 2014, 61, 136–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Hu, N.; Fukunaga, H.; Atobe, S.; Liu, Y.; Li, J. Piezoresistive strain sensors made from carbon nanotubes based polymer nanocomposites. Sensors 2011, 11, 10691–10723. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bouhamed, A.; Al-Hamry, A.; Müller, C.; Choura, S.; Kanoun, O. Assessing the electrical behaviour of MWCNTs/epoxy nanocomposite for strain sensing. Compos. Part B Eng. 2017, 128, 91–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shen, J.; Buschhorn, S.; de Hosson, J.T.M.; Schulte, K.; Fiedler, B. Pressure and temperature induced electrical resistance change in nano-carbon/epoxy composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2015, 115, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, J.; Lu, Y.; Ye, Q.; Cinke, M.; Han, J.; Meyyappan, M. Carbon nanotube sensors for gas and organic vapor detection. Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 929–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chung, D. Carbon materials for structural self-sensing, electromagnetic shielding and thermal interfacing. Carbon 2012, 50, 3342–3353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, C.; Thostenson, E.T.; Chou, T.W. Sensors and actuators based on carbon nanotubes and their composites: A review. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2008, 68, 1227–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ku-Herrera, J.; Avilés, F.; Seidel, G. Self-sensing of elastic strain, matrix yielding and plasticity in multiwall carbon nanotube/vinyl ester composites. Smart Mater. Struct. 2013, 22, 085003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ayatollahi, M.; Shadlou, S.; Shokrieh, M.; Chitsazzadeh, M. Effect of multi-walled carbon nanotube aspect ratio on mechanical and electrical properties of epoxy-based nanocomposites. Polym. Test. 2011, 30, 548–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Park, J.M.; Jang, J.H.; Wang, Z.J.; Kwon, D.J.; DeVries, K.L. Self-sensing of carbon fiber/carbon nanofiber-epoxy composites with two different nanofiber aspect ratios investigated by electrical resistance and wettability measurements. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2010, 41, 1702–1711. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mohiuddin, M.; Hoa, S.V. Temperature dependent electrical conductivity of CNT-PEEK composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2011, 72, 21–27. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cao, X.; Wei, X.; Li, G.; Hu, C.; Dai, K.; Guo, J.; Zheng, G.; Liu, C.; Shen, C.; Guo, Z. Strain sensing behaviors of epoxy nanocomposites with carbon nanotubes under cyclic deformation. Polymer 2017, 112, 1–9. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chowdhury, S.A.; Saha, M.C.; Patterson, S.; Robison, T.; Liu, Y.T. Highly Conductive Polydimethylsiloxane/Carbon Nanofiber Composites for Flexible Sensor Applications. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2019, 4, 1800398. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Charara, M.; Abshirini, M.; Saha, M.C.; Altan, M.C.; Liu, Y.T. Highly sensitive compression sensors using three-dimensional printed polydimethylsiloxane/carbon nanotube nanocomposites. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 2019, 30, 1216–1224. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dinh, N.T.; Kanoun, O. Temperature-compensated force/pressure sensor based on multi-walled carbon nanotube epoxy composites. Sensors 2015, 15, 11133–11150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Gojny, F.H.; Schulte, K. Functionalisation effect on the thermo-mechanical behaviour of multi-wall carbon nanotube/epoxy-compo sites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2004, 64, 2303–2308. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Godara, A.; Mezzo, L.; Luizi, F.; Warrier, A.; Lomov, S.V.; Van Vuure, A.W.; Gorbatikh, L.; Moldenaers, P.; Verpoest, I. Influence of carbon nanotube reinforcement on the processing and the mechanical behaviour of carbon fiber/epoxy composites. Carbon 2009, 47, 2914–2923. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jang, S.H.; Yin, H.M. Effective electrical conductivity of carbon nanotube-polymer composites: A simplified model and its validation. Mater. Res. Express 2015, 2, 045602. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jang, S.H.; Yin, H.M. Effect of aligned ferromagnetic particles on strain sensitivity of multi-walled carbon nanotube/polydimethylsiloxane sensors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 106, 141903. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Jang, S.H.; Yin, H.M. Characterization and modeling of the effective electrical conductivity of a carbon nanotube/polymer composite containing chain-structured ferromagnetic particles. J. Compos. Mater. 2017, 51, 171–178. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yin, G.; Hu, N.; Karube, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, Y.; Fukunaga, H. A carbon nanotube/polymer strain sensor with linear and anti-symmetric piezoresistivity. J. Compos. Mater. 2011, 45, 1315–1323. [Google Scholar]
  25. Guadagno, L.; De Vivo, B.; Di Bartolomeo, A.; Lamberti, P.; Sorrentino, A.; Tucci, V.; Vertuccio, L.; Vittoria, V. Effect of functionalization on the thermo-mechanical and electrical behavior of multi-wall carbon nanotube/epoxy composites. Carbon 2011, 49, 1919–1930. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. He, X.J.; Du, J.H.; Ying, Z.; Cheng, H.M.; He, X.J. Positive temperature coefficient effect in multiwalled carbon nanotube/high-density polyethylene composites. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 86, 062112. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chu, Y.C.; Weng, M.H.; Lin, W.Y.; Tsai, H.J.; Hsu, W.K. A carbon nanotube-epoxy interface improved damping below the glass transition temperature. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 21271–21276. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zeng, Y.; Lu, G.; Wang, H.; Du, J.; Ying, Z.; Liu, C. Positive temperature coefficient thermistors based on carbon nanotube/polymer composites. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 6684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Al-Bahrani, M.; Graham-Jones, J.; Gombos, Z.; Al-Ani, A.; Cree, A. High-efficient multifunctional self-heating nanocomposite-based MWCNTs for energy applications. Int. J. Energy Res. 2019. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Electro-thermo-mechanical test set-up.
Figure 1. Electro-thermo-mechanical test set-up.
Materials 13 00259 g001
Figure 2. (a) Electrical conductivity and (b) curve fitting of CNT/epoxy composites.
Figure 2. (a) Electrical conductivity and (b) curve fitting of CNT/epoxy composites.
Materials 13 00259 g002
Figure 3. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of (a) pristine epoxy and (b) CNT/epoxy composite (2.0 wt %).
Figure 3. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of (a) pristine epoxy and (b) CNT/epoxy composite (2.0 wt %).
Materials 13 00259 g003
Figure 4. (a) Change in resistance of CNT/epoxy composites under static compressive loading; (b) electro-mechanical response of CNT/epoxy composites (2.0 wt %) under cyclic compressive loadings, (c) maximum peak at three cycles for all CNT/epoxy composites.
Figure 4. (a) Change in resistance of CNT/epoxy composites under static compressive loading; (b) electro-mechanical response of CNT/epoxy composites (2.0 wt %) under cyclic compressive loadings, (c) maximum peak at three cycles for all CNT/epoxy composites.
Materials 13 00259 g004aMaterials 13 00259 g004b
Figure 5. The effect of temperature on the change in resistance of CNT/epoxy composites at rest.
Figure 5. The effect of temperature on the change in resistance of CNT/epoxy composites at rest.
Materials 13 00259 g005
Figure 6. Electro-mechanical behavior of CNT/epoxy composites (1.0 wt %) under (a) static compressive loading and (b) cyclic compressive loading.
Figure 6. Electro-mechanical behavior of CNT/epoxy composites (1.0 wt %) under (a) static compressive loading and (b) cyclic compressive loading.
Materials 13 00259 g006
Figure 7. Schematic illustration of microstructure of CNT/epoxy composite (a) below the glass transition temperature and (b) above the glass transition temperature.
Figure 7. Schematic illustration of microstructure of CNT/epoxy composite (a) below the glass transition temperature and (b) above the glass transition temperature.
Materials 13 00259 g007

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jang, S.-H.; Li, L.-Y. Self-Sensing Carbon Nanotube Composites Exposed to Glass Transition Temperature. Materials 2020, 13, 259. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13020259

AMA Style

Jang S-H, Li L-Y. Self-Sensing Carbon Nanotube Composites Exposed to Glass Transition Temperature. Materials. 2020; 13(2):259. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13020259

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jang, Sung-Hwan, and Long-Yuan Li. 2020. "Self-Sensing Carbon Nanotube Composites Exposed to Glass Transition Temperature" Materials 13, no. 2: 259. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13020259

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop