Next Article in Journal
Influence of Pore-Size Distribution on the Resistance of Clay Brick to Freeze–Thaw Cycles
Previous Article in Journal
Fabrication and Characterization of the Newly Developed Superalloys Based on Inconel 740
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

NiO/Carbon Aerogel Microspheres with Plum-Pudding Structure as Anode Materials for Lithium Ion Batteries

Department of Materials Engineering, Taizhou University, Taizhou 318000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2020, 13(10), 2363; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13102363
Submission received: 9 April 2020 / Revised: 19 May 2020 / Accepted: 20 May 2020 / Published: 21 May 2020

Abstract

:
To enhance the electrochemical performance of nickel oxide as anode materials for lithium ion batteries, NiO/carbon aerogel microspheres with a plum-pudding structure were designed and prepared by a sol-gel technique followed by two calcination processes under different atmospheres. Carbon aerogel microspheres (pudding) can act as a buffering and conductive matrix to enhance the structural stability and conductivity of the embedded NiO particles (plums), which are quite advantageous to the cycling performance and rate capability. Consequently, NiO/carbon aerogel microspheres with a plum-pudding structure deliver an initial charge capacity of 808 mAh g−1 and a reversible capacity retention of 85% after 100 cycles. The enhancement in electrochemical performance relative to pure NiO microspheres suggests that the design of a plum-pudding structure is quite effective.

1. Introduction

Transition-metal oxides, especially iron group metal oxides, are developing as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries because of their high capacity, low cost, easy preparation, and environmentally friendly nature. They deliver high capacities ranging from 700 to 1000 mAh g−1 based on the mechanism of reversible conversion reaction [1,2]. The reaction involves large volume expansion and causes particle pulverization, which further leads to the separation of materials from the electrode, and the generation of new surfaces to produce more solid electrolyte interface (SEI). Therefore, iron group metal oxide anode materials often exhibit poor actual electrochemical performance including fast capacity fading and low coulombic efficiency, making it currently difficult for the materials to meet practical applications.
Fabricating nanostructured composites is the most frequent method to enhance the electrochemical performance of energy conversion and storage materials [3,4,5,6,7,8]. The nanostructures can increase the reaction interface and shorten the charge transport distance, thus reducing electrode polarization. Forming composites usually produces better conductivity and structural stability. During the past decade, various nanostructures have been designed for active materials such as low-dimensional [9,10], porous [11,12], spherical [13,14,15,16], hollow [17,18], core/shell [19], yolk/shell [20,21], and so on, meanwhile, conductive ductile matrices such as metal [22,23] and/or carbon [24,25,26] have been introduced to fabricate nanocomposites. It is known from these examples that many novel-structured nanocomposites show significantly enhanced electrochemical performance. Therefore, rational designing of the structure and component of electrode materials is extremely crucial to the improvement of electrochemical performance.
In this present work, NiO/carbon aerogel microspheres with a plum-pudding structure were well designed, carefully fabricated, and tested in detail as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. The plum-pudding structure significantly enhanced the reversible capacity, cycling stability, and rate capability.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Preparation

The sample was prepared by a sol-gel method using nickel salt and resorcinol-formaldehyde (RF) organics as raw materials. Microsphere particles can be obtained by controlling RF monomer concentration in the initial solution [27], and metals or metal oxides can be produced after the subsequent carbothermal reduction or air oxidation processes, respectively [28]. The preparation proceeded in three steps, as shown in Figure 1. The first step was the preparation of a NiCl2/RF aerogel precursor. In a 200 mL beaker, 10 mmol nickel chloride, 60 mmol resorcinol, 9 mL formaldehyde (37 wt%), and 0.5 mL hydrochloric acid (37 wt%) were dissolved in 80 mL deionized water to form a solution. The beaker was covered by plastic wrap and placed in a water bath maintained at 80 °C for 3 h. The resulting gel was dried at 80 °C for several days in air until the weight became stable. The second step was the carbonization of the NiCl2/RF aerogel. In a quartz-tube furnace, the NiCl2/RF aerogel was carbonized at 750 °C for 3 h under flowing argon and a Ni/C aerogel was produced. The last step was the oxidation of the Ni/C aerogel. In a box furnace, the Ni/C aerogel was calcined in air at 445 °C for 16 h in air using a heating rate of 2.5 °C min−1 as well as a free cooling rate, and the final product (i.e., NiO/C aerogel microspheres) was obtained.
Pure NiO microspheres were also prepared for a comparison of electrochemical performance by calcining the Ni/C aerogel in air at 445 °C for 24 h under the same other conditions.

2.2. Material Characterization

The samples were characterized by means of X-ray diffraction (XRD, D8 advance, Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM, S-4800, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan, equipped with energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS)).

2.3. Electrochemical Measurements

For electrochemical tests, a slurry was prepared to fabricate working electrodes. The slurry consisted of active materials, acetylene black, and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) (dissolved in N-methyl-pyrrolidone (NMP)) in a mass ratio of 8:1:1. Working electrodes, in which the areal density of the electrode material was about 0.9 mg cm−2, were fabricated by spreading the slurry on copper foil, drying in vacuum, and being punched into wafers. In an argon-filled glove box, the working electrode was assembled into a 2025 coin-type half-cell, together with a lithium wafer as a counter electrode, and 1 M LiPF6 dissolved in a mixed solvent of ethylene carbonate (EC), dimethyl carbonate (DMC), and ethyl methyl carbonate (EMC) with a volume ratio of 1:1:1 as the electrolyte.
Electrochemical investigations were performed at a constant temperature of 25 °C. The cells were subjected to galvanostatic discharge and charge tests on a program-controlled battery test system (CT2001A, LAND, Wuhan, China) at 100 mA g−1 between 0.02 and 3 V for 100 cycles. Subsequently, the current density was changed to 200, 500, 1000, 2000, and 100 mA g−1 in sequence for the evaluation of rate capability. The specific capacity was calculated from the mass of NiO/C composite in the electrode including NiO and carbon aerogel. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) analysis of the electrodes was performed on an electrochemical workstation (PGSTAT302N, Metrohm Autolab, Utrecht, The Netherlands) between 0 and 3 V using a scan rate of 0.1 mV s−1. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was also carried out on the electrochemical workstation over a frequency range of 0.01 to 100 kHz using a small voltage signal of 5 mV in amplitude.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 2a presents the SEM image of Ni/C aerogel. The aerogel was constructed by interconnected microspheres, and most of them were quite regular in shape. They were close in diameter and the average value was about 4 μm. From some broken microspheres, some particles could be seen, and according to the magnified image (Figure 2b), the particles were sharp-edged and embedded inside the carbon microsphere matrix. The EDS pattern (Figure 2c) recorded on the particle area showed elements of Ni and C, and no other elements were identified, indicative of complete carbonization and reduction.
After the calcination process of Ni/C aerogel in air, the sample preserved its spherical structure, as shown in Figure 3a, but the diameter of microspheres shrank severely to the average value of about 2.0 μm. The embedded particles were highly dispersed inside the carbon aerogel microsphere, exhibiting a plum-pudding structure, just like plums (particles) embedded in a pudding (carbon aerogel microsphere) matrix. The particles had submicron sizes ranging from 200 to 700 nm. Figure 3b is a magnified image of a broken microsphere with the internal particles exposed. It can be identified that the carbon aerogel microsphere had a mesoporous structure and contained some void spaces. The internal particles were submicron-sized spheres assembled by nanoparticles, quite different from the original nickel particles, which was caused by the oxidation. To observe the particles deep inside the carbon microsphere, the sample was ground for some time to produce a small number of fragments, and the resulting cross-sectional image is presented in Figure 3c. The particles showed the same morphology, and the EDS pattern recorded on the particle area (Figure 3d) showed only the peaks of Ni, O, and C, confirming that the internal particles were also oxidized.
Figure 4 presents the XRD pattern of plum-pudding structured NiO/C aerogel microspheres. A group of strong diffraction peaks agreed well with the standard data of NiO with a rock-salt structure (JCPDS card no. 47-1049). The pattern also exhibited a broad peak around 23° with low intensity, which is the typical diffraction characteristic of amorphous carbon [29]. Diffraction peaks of other substances were not obvious, indicating that organic carbonization and nickel oxidation were both complete.
Figure 5 shows the SEM image of the pure NiO sample produced by the calcination of Ni/C aerogel in air for 24 h. Apparently, the carbon aerogel was completely burnt out, leaving only NiO microspheres with a regular shape. According to the weight loss of the sample, it was calculated that the carbon content in the NiO/C aerogel composite was about 13 wt%.
As anode materials of lithium-ion batteries, the electrochemical performances of plum-pudding structured NiO/C microspheres and NiO microspheres were tested together for comparison. Their galvanostatic discharge-charge curves tested at 100 mA g−1 are compared in Figure 6. For both samples, except for the first irreversible discharge curve, the subsequent charge and discharge curves were similar. The NiO/C electrode delivers a first charge capacity (reversible capacity) of 808 mAh g−1, while for the NiO electrode, this value was 690 mAh g−1. The reversible capacity of the NiO/C composite exceeded the theoretical value of nickel oxide (718 mAh g−1), and the extra capacity should be ascribed from the carbon aerogel. According to the previously reported research, it is possible for the carbon aerogel to contribute a high reversible capacity derived from the micropores in the amorphous regions as well as the graphene layers in the graphite crystallites [29,30,31]. To study this further, the CV results are compared in Figure 7. Both electrodes showed a strong peak in the first cathodic curve, which corresponded to the first lithiation process including the formation of SEI and the conversion reaction of NiO to Ni. The subsequent anodic/cathodic curves were quite similar in shape, indicative of reversible reactions. The cathodic peaks around 1.1 V were related to the reduction of NiO to Ni and the anodic peaks around 2.2 V were attributed to the re-oxidation of Ni to NiO. However, there was a major difference between their curves. In the curves of the NiO/C electrode (Figure 7a), the CV characteristics of graphite (i.e. lithiation peak near 0 V and delithiation peak around 0.2 V) could be well distinguished, while in those of the NiO electrodes (Figure 7b), these peaks did not exist. This confirms the reversible lithium storage of the carbon aerogel.
Figure 8a compares their capacity evolution until 100 cycles at a current density of 100 mA g−1. The NiO/C electrode showed a higher capacity throughout the cycle, and its reversible capacity retention after 100 cycles was 85%, higher than that of the NiO electrode (71%), and indicative of better cycling performance. Figure 8b compares the evolution of their coulombic efficiency. Apart from the first two cycles, the coulombic efficiency of NiO/C electrode was mostly higher, indicative of the better reversibility of electrochemical reactions.
Figure 9 compares the rate capability of two electrodes. The cells, which have experienced 100 cycles at 100 mA g−1, continued to be tested at higher current densities of 200, 500, 1000, 2000 mA g−1, and eventually, 100 mA g−1. The capacities decreased with current densities, but at each current density, the NiO/C electrode delivered higher capacities than those of the NiO electrode, indicative of enhanced high-rate capability.
Figure 10 shows the Nyquist plots of two electrodes after 100 cycles. The plots were composed of a semicircle in the medium frequency region and a sloping line in the low frequency region. The equivalent circuit inserted in the figure was used to fit the plot. The circuit components of Rs, Rf, Rct, W, and C represent the electrolyte resistance, SEI resistance, charge transfer impedance, diffusion-controlled Warburg impedance, and capacitance, respectively. The fitting results showed that the values of Rf and Rct for the NiO/C electrode were 10.05 and 57.87 Ω, respectively, lower than those of the NiO electrodes (31.12 and 114.2 Ω, respectively), suggesting that the NiO/C electrode exhibited enhanced electrode kinetics.
The enhanced electrochemical performance of the NiO/C electrode was attributed to its plum-pudding nanocomposite structure, that is, spherical NiO particles were embedded in carbon aerogel microspheres. Carbon aerogel microspheres have at least four advantages. First, the carbon aerogel effectively disperses NiO particles, and enables each particle to fully participate in the electrochemical reaction. Second, the carbon aerogel can act as a porous elastic matrix, which can buffer the volume expansion of NiO particles and thus suppress pulverization. Third, the interconnected carbon microspheres can form a highly conductive network, which helps to improve electronic conductivity and reduce electrode polarization [32]. Fourth, the carbon aerogel is active toward lithium, which is beneficial to increase the capacity of the composite. As a result, the NiO/C electrode exhibits higher reversible capacity, better cycling stability, and high-rate capability.
Due to the above-mentioned structural advantages, relative to many previously reported NiO-based anode materials [15,17,33,34,35,36,37], the NiO/C aerogel microspheres with a plum-pudding structure in this present work also showed competitive electrochemical performance, as shown in Table 1. The enhancement of their electrochemical performance fully confirms the effectiveness of this structural design, and it is believed that this structure can also be applied to other electrode materials.

4. Conclusions

In summary, NiO/carbon aerogel microspheres with a plum-pudding structure were successfully prepared by a sol-gel process combined with a carbonization process in argon as well as a calcination process in air. The composite particle contained the carbon aerogel microspheres and the spherical NiO particles embedded inside. As anode materials for lithium-ion batteries, NiO/C aerogel microspheres exhibit significant enhancement in electrochemical performance including reversible capacity, cycling stability, and rate capability compared to those of the NiO microspheres. The enhancement is ascribed to the plum-pudding nanocomposite structure, as the carbon aerogel microspheres have the ability of stabilizing the structure of active materials, improving the electrode conductivity, and increasing the specific capacity.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.H.; Methodology, R.G. and Y.L.; Validation, R.G. and Y.C.; Formal Analysis, Y.L.; Investigation, R.G. and Y.C.; Resources, Y.L.; Data Curation, Y.C.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, R.G. and X.H.; Writing—Review & Editing, X.H.; Supervision, X.H.; Project Administration, X.H.; Funding Acquisition, X.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Taizhou University (grant number 0103230002).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Poizot, P.; Laruelle, S.; Grugeon, S.; Dupont, L.; Tarascon, J.M. Nano-sized transition-metal oxides as negative-electrode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Nature 2000, 407, 496–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Poizot, P.; Laruelle, S.; Grugeon, S.; Tarascon, J.M. Rationalization of the low-potential reactivity of 3d-metal-based inorganic compounds toward Li. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2002, 149, A1212–A1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Huang, X.H.; Wu, J.B.; Guo, R.Q.; Lin, Y.; Zhang, P. Aligned nickel-cobalt oxide nanosheet arrays for lithium ion battery applications. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2014, 39, 21399–21404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Huang, X.H.; Wu, J.B.; Cao, Y.Q.; Zhang, P.; Lin, Y.; Guo, R.Q. Cobalt nanosheet arrays supported silicon film as anode materials for lithium ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 203, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhong, W.W.; Huang, J.D.; Liang, S.Q.; Liu, J.; Li, Y.J.; Cai, G.M.; Jiang, Y.; Liu, J. New prelithiated V2O5 superstructure for lithium-ion batteries with long cycle life and high power. ACS Energy Lett. 2020, 5, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, L.; Gu, C.; Ge, X.; Zhang, J.; Zhu, H.; Tu, J.P. A NiCo2O4 shell on a hollow Ni nanorod array core for water splitting with enhanced electrocatalytic performance. ChemNanoMat 2018, 4, 124–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shen, S.J.; Zhong, W.W.; Huang, X.H.; Lin, Y.; Wang, T.L. Ordered ZnO/Ni hollow microsphere arrays as anode materials for lithium ion batteries. Materials 2019, 12, 1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Wang, L.; Yuan, Y.F.; Zhang, T.; Chen, Q.; Guo, S.Y. Co3O4 hollow nanospheres/carbon-assembled mesoporous polyhedron with internal bubbles encapsulating TiO2 nanosphere for high-performance lithium ion batteries. Nanotechnology 2019, 30, 355401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Oh, S.H.; Park, J.S.; Jo, M.S.; Kang, Y.C.; Cho, J.S. Design and synthesis of tube-in-tube structured NiO nanobelts with superior electrochemical properties for lithium-ion storage. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 347, 889–899. [Google Scholar]
  10. Gu, L.L.; Xie, W.H.; Bai, S.; Liu, B.L.; Xue, S.; Li, Q.; He, D.Y. Facile fabrication of binder-free NiO electrodes with high rate capacity for lithium-ion batteries. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 368, 298–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jiang, T.C.; Bu, F.X.; Feng, X.X.; Shakir, I.; Hao, G.L.; Xu, Y.X. Porous Fe2O3 nanoframeworks encapsulated within three-dimensional graphene as high-performance flexible anode for lithium-ion battery. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 5140–5147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wu, K.; Geng, B.J.; Zhang, C.; Shen, W.W.; Yang, D.W.; Li, Z.; Yang, Z.B.; Pan, D.Y. Hierarchical porous arrays of mesoporous Co3O4 nanosheets grown on graphene skin for high-rate and high-capacity energy storage. J. Alloy. Compd. 2020, 820, 153296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bai, Z.C.; Ju, Z.C.; Guo, C.L.; Qian, Y.T.; Tang, B.; Xiong, S.L. Direct large-scale synthesis of 3D hierarchical mesoporous NiO microspheres as high-performance anode materials for lithium ion batteries. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 3268–3273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Han, W.J.; Qin, X.Y.; Wu, J.X.; Li, Q.; Liu, M.; Xia, Y.; Du, H.D.; Li, B.H.; Kang, F.Y. Electrosprayed porous Fe3O4/carbon microspheres as anode materials for high-performance lithium-ion batteries. Nano Res. 2018, 11, 892–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lv, P.P.; Zhao, H.L.; Zeng, Z.P.; Gao, C.H.; Liu, X.; Zhang, T.H. Self-assembled three-dimensional hierarchical NiO nano/microspheres as high-performance anode material for lithium ion batteries. App. Surf. Sci. 2015, 329, 301–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, J.B.; Yan, D.; Hou, S.J.; Lu, T.; Yao, Y.F.; Chua, D.H.C.; Pan, L.K. Metal-organic frameworks derived yolk-shell ZnO/NiO microspheres as high-performance anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 335, 579–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tian, J.Y.; Shao, Q.; Dong, X.J.; Zheng, J.L.; Pan, D.; Zhang, X.Y.; Cao, H.L.; Hao, L.H.; Liu, J.R.; Mai, X.M.; et al. Bio-template synthesized NiO/C hollow microspheres with enhanced Li-ion battery electrochemical performance. Electrochim. Acta 2017, 261, 236–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mao, Y.Q.; Shen, X.Y.; Wu, Z.H.; Zhu, L.P.; Liao, G.H. Preparation of Co3O4 hollow microspheres by recycling spent lithium-ion batteries and their application in electrochemical supercapacitors. J. Alloy. Compd. 2020, 816, 152604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, B.B.; Wang, G.; Cheng, X.M.; Wang, H. Synthesis and electrochemical investigation of core-shell ultrathin NiO nanosheets grown on hollow carbon microspheres composite for high performance lithium and sodium ion batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 306, 1193–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, G.M.; Li, Y.; Chen, J.; Zhao, P.P.; Li, D.G.; Dong, Y.H.; Zhang, L.P. Synthesis and research of egg shell-yolk NiO/C porous composites as lithium-ion battery anode material. Electrochim. Acta 2017, 245, 941–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, X.H.; Wang, J.Y.; Chen, Z.H.; Yang, K.; Zhang, Z.X.; Shi, Z.X.; Mei, T.; Qian, J.W.; Li, J.H.; Wang, X.B. Yolk-double shell Fe3O4@C@C composite as high-performance anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 822, 153656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bell, J.; Ye, R.; Ahmed, K.; Liu, C.; Ozkan, M.; Ozkan, C.S. Free-standing Ni-NiO nanofiber cloth anode for high capacity and high rate Li-ion batteries. Nano Energy 2015, 18, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, C.W.; Song, Y.; Xu, L.B.; Yin, F.X. In situ encapsulation of Co/Co3O4 nanoparticles in nitrogen-doped hierarchically ordered porous carbon as high performance anode for lithium-ion batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 380, 122545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Xu, J.; Zhang, W.X.; Chen, Y.; Fan, H.B.; Su, D.W.; Wang, G.X. MOF-derived porous N-Co3O4@N-C nanododecahedral wrapped with reduced graphene oxide as high capacity cathodes for lithium-sulfur batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 2729–2807. [Google Scholar]
  25. Shi, W.P.; Zhang, Y.M.; Key, J.L.; Shen, P.K. Three-dimensional graphene sheets with NiO nanobelt outgrowths for enhanced capacity and long term high rate cycling Li-ion battery anode material. J. Power Sources 2018, 379, 362–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chen, X.L.; Xiao, T.; Wang, S.L.; Li, J.; Xiang, P.; Jiang, L.H.; Tan, X.Y. Superior Li-ion storage performance of graphene decorated NiO nanowalls on Ni as anode for lithium ion batteries. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2019, 222, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Elkhatat, A.M.; Al-Muhtaseb, S.A. Advances in tailoring resorcinol-formaldehyde organic and carbon gels. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 2887–2903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Leventis, N.; Chandrasekaran, N.; Sadekar, A.G.; Mulik, S.; Sotiriou-Leventis, C. The effect of compactness on the carbothermal conversion of interpenetrating metal oxide/resorcinol-formaldehyde nanoparticle networks to porous metals and carbides. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 7456–7471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yang, X.Q.; Huang, H.; Zhang, G.Q.; Li, X.X.; Wu, D.C.; Fu, R.W. Carbon aerogel with 3-D continuous skeleton and mesopore structure for lithium-ion batteries application. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2015, 149, 657–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, N.P.; Shen, J.; Liu, D. A Fe2O3 nanoparticle/carbon aerogel composite for use as an anode material for lithium ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 97, 271–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hao, F.B.; Zhang, Z.W.; Yin, L.W. Co3O4/carbon aerogel hybrids as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries with enhanced electrochemical properties. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 8337–8344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Khodabakhshi, S.; Fulvio, P.F.; Andreoli, E. Carbon black reborn: Structure and chemistry for renewable energy harnessing. Carbon 2020, 162, 604–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Pan, Y.; Zeng, W.J.; Hu, R.; Li, B.; Wang, G.L.; Li, Q.T. Investigation of Cu doped flake-NiO as an anode material for lithium ion batteries. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 35948–35956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Qiu, Y.; Huang, H.; Song, W.L.; Gan, Y.P.; Wang, K.; Zhang, J.; Xia, Y.; Liang, C.; He, X.P.; Zhang, W.K. In-situ electrolytic synthesis and superior lithium storage capability of Ni-NiO/C nanocomposite by sacrificial nickel anode in molten carbonates. J. Alloy. Compd. 2020, 834, 155111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, X.J.; Fan, L.L.; Li, X.F.; Shan, H.; Chen, C.; Yan, B.; Xiong, D.B.; Li, D.J. Enhanced anode performance of flower-like NiO/RGO nanocomposites for lithium-ion batteries. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2018, 217, 547–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wu, H.J.; Wang, Y.Q.; Zheng, C.H.; Zhu, J.M.; Wu, G.L.; Li, X.H. Multi-shelled NiO hollow spheres: Easy hydrothermal synthesis and lithium storage performances. J. Alloy. Compd. 2016, 685, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Pang, H.C.; Guan, B.Q.; Sun, W.W.; Wang, Y. Metal-organic-frameworks derivation of mesoporous NiO nanorod for high-performance lithium ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 213, 351–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the material preparation process.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the material preparation process.
Materials 13 02363 g001
Figure 2. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) characterization results of the Ni/C aerogel microspheres obtained after the carbonization process in argon: (a) low magnification image, (b) high magnification image, and (c) the corresponding energy dispersive spectrum (EDS).
Figure 2. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) characterization results of the Ni/C aerogel microspheres obtained after the carbonization process in argon: (a) low magnification image, (b) high magnification image, and (c) the corresponding energy dispersive spectrum (EDS).
Materials 13 02363 g002
Figure 3. SEM characterization results of the NiO/C aerogel microspheres produced after the calcination in air: (a) low magnification image, (b) high magnification image, (c) cross-sectional image and (d) the corresponding EDS pattern.
Figure 3. SEM characterization results of the NiO/C aerogel microspheres produced after the calcination in air: (a) low magnification image, (b) high magnification image, (c) cross-sectional image and (d) the corresponding EDS pattern.
Materials 13 02363 g003
Figure 4. X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of NiO/C aerogel microspheres with a plum-pudding structure.
Figure 4. X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of NiO/C aerogel microspheres with a plum-pudding structure.
Materials 13 02363 g004
Figure 5. SEM image of NiO microspheres prepared by burning out the carbon aerogel in air.
Figure 5. SEM image of NiO microspheres prepared by burning out the carbon aerogel in air.
Materials 13 02363 g005
Figure 6. Galvanostatic discharge-charge curves of (a) the NiO/C electrode and (b) NiO electrode.
Figure 6. Galvanostatic discharge-charge curves of (a) the NiO/C electrode and (b) NiO electrode.
Materials 13 02363 g006
Figure 7. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves of (a) the NiO/C and (b) NiO electrodes.
Figure 7. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves of (a) the NiO/C and (b) NiO electrodes.
Materials 13 02363 g007
Figure 8. Comparison of (a) cycling performance and (b) coulombic efficiency between the two electrodes.
Figure 8. Comparison of (a) cycling performance and (b) coulombic efficiency between the two electrodes.
Materials 13 02363 g008
Figure 9. Comparison of the rate capability of two electrodes.
Figure 9. Comparison of the rate capability of two electrodes.
Materials 13 02363 g009
Figure 10. Comparison of the Nyquist plots of two electrodes.
Figure 10. Comparison of the Nyquist plots of two electrodes.
Materials 13 02363 g010
Table 1. Comparison in electrochemical performance between some published NiO-based anode materials and the NiO/C sample in the present work.
Table 1. Comparison in electrochemical performance between some published NiO-based anode materials and the NiO/C sample in the present work.
MaterialInitial Reversible Capacity mAh g−1Capacity Retention % (Nth)Current Density mA g−1Reference
NiO nano/microspheres73596 (100)100[15]
NiO/C hollow microspheres76083 (100)100[17]
Cu-doped NiO nanoflakes1108.959 (50)100[33]
Ni−NiO/C nanocomposite914.1170 (300)100[34]
NiO/rGO nanoflowers996.970 (100)100[35]
NiO double-shelled hollow spheres964.314 (100)200[36]
NiO mesoporous nanorods73739 (100)100[37]
NiO/C aerogel microspheres80885 (100)100This work

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Guo, R.; Huang, X.; Lin, Y.; Cao, Y. NiO/Carbon Aerogel Microspheres with Plum-Pudding Structure as Anode Materials for Lithium Ion Batteries. Materials 2020, 13, 2363. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13102363

AMA Style

Guo R, Huang X, Lin Y, Cao Y. NiO/Carbon Aerogel Microspheres with Plum-Pudding Structure as Anode Materials for Lithium Ion Batteries. Materials. 2020; 13(10):2363. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13102363

Chicago/Turabian Style

Guo, Renqing, Xiaohua Huang, Yan Lin, and Yiqi Cao. 2020. "NiO/Carbon Aerogel Microspheres with Plum-Pudding Structure as Anode Materials for Lithium Ion Batteries" Materials 13, no. 10: 2363. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13102363

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop