Next Article in Journal
A Multifunctional Mineral Binder for Plywood Production: The Effect of Manufacturing Parameters on Bonding Quality
Previous Article in Journal
A Design of Experiment Approach for Surface Roughness Comparisons of Foam Injection-Moulding Methods
Open AccessArticle

Dry Sliding Friction of Tool Steels and Their Comparison of Wear in Contact with ZrO2 and X46Cr13

1
Faculty of Special Technology, Alexander Dubcek University of Trenčín, 911 06 Trenčín, Slovakia
2
Department of Political Science, Alexander Dubcek University of Trenčín, 911 06 Trenčín, Slovakia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2020, 13(10), 2359; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13102359
Received: 26 March 2020 / Revised: 15 May 2020 / Accepted: 18 May 2020 / Published: 20 May 2020
Tool steels are used in stamping, shearing processes, and as cutting tools due to their good mechanical properties. During their working cycle, steels are subject to aggressive conditions such as heat stress, fatigue, and wear. In this paper, three tool steels, namely X153CrMoV12, X37CrMoV5-1, and X45NiCrMo4 were selected against two types of bearing balls, ZrO2 and X46Cr1. All measurements were performed on a UMT TriboLab universal tribometric instrument under dry conditions. The main objective of the experiment was to analyze and compare tool steel wear in contact with two kinds of bearing balls with a diameter of 4.76 mm. This evaluation is focused on the hardness, surface roughness, and microstructure of all samples and on the impact of the input parameters on the resulting wear. All three types of tool steels were measured in the basic annealed state and, subsequently, in the state after hardening and tempering. Experimental results show that tool steels, belonging to high strength steels, can successfully represent wear resistant steels. The content of carbide elements, their size, and shape in the microstructure play an important role in the friction process and subsequent wear. Three types of loads were used and compared in the experiments 30, 60, and 90 N. Increasing the load results in significant degradation of the material on the sample surface. Lastly, the impact of hardness and roughness of materials on wear has also been proven. If abrasive wear occurs in the friction process, there is a greater degree of wear than that of adhesive wear. This is due to less abrasive particles, which behave like a cutting wedge and are subject to subsequent deformation strengthening due to the load increase, which adversely affects the further friction process. Analysis of the results showed that the ZrO2 ceramic ball showed significantly better wear values when compared to the X46Cr13 stainless steel ball. It also improves the values of the coefficient of friction with respect to the type of wear that occurs when the experimental materials and counterparts are in contact. View Full-Text
Keywords: tool steel; tribology; ZrO2 counterpart; coefficient of friction tool steel; tribology; ZrO2 counterpart; coefficient of friction
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Krbata, M.; Eckert, M.; Bartosova, L.; Barenyi, I.; Majerik, J.; Mikuš, P.; Rendkova, P. Dry Sliding Friction of Tool Steels and Their Comparison of Wear in Contact with ZrO2 and X46Cr13. Materials 2020, 13, 2359.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop