Next Article in Journal
Tomato-Processing By-Product Combustion: Thermal and Kinetic Analyses
Next Article in Special Issue
Estimation of Heating Temperature for Fire-Damaged Concrete Structures Using Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System
Previous Article in Journal
Fabrication of Diatomite/Silicalite-1 Composites and Their Property for VOCs Adsorption
Previous Article in Special Issue
Field Validation of a Magnetic Sensor to Monitor Borehole Deviation during Tunnel Excavation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Monolithic Structure-Optical Fiber Sensor with Temperature Compensation for Pressure Measurement

1
School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang 524088, China
2
School of Optoelectronic Engineering and Instrumentation Science, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
3
School of mathematics and computer science, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang 524088, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2019, 12(4), 552; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12040552
Submission received: 7 January 2019 / Revised: 3 February 2019 / Accepted: 4 February 2019 / Published: 13 February 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Structural Health Monitoring for Civil Engineering Materials)

Abstract

:
In this paper, an optical fiber pressure sensor cascading a diaphragm-assisted Fabry-Perot interferometer (FPI) and a fiber Bragg grating (FBG) is proposed and demonstrated. The sensor comprises an optical fiber, a fused-silica ferrule, and a fused-silica diaphragm. We use a femtosecond laser firstly to fabricate a pit on the end face of the ferrule and then investigate the laser heat conduction welding and deep penetration welding technology for manufacturing the seepage pressure sensor of the all-fused-silica material. We develop a sensor based on a monolithic structured FPI without adhesive bonding by means of all-laser-welding. The pressure characteristics of the sensor have good linearity at different temperatures. Also, the monolithic structured sensor possesses excellent resolution, hysteresis, and long-term stability. The environmental temperature obtained by the FBG is employed to compensate for the difference in seepage pressure at different temperatures, and the difference in seepage pressure responses at different temperatures is shown to be very small after temperature compensation.

1. Introduction

The failure of a levee can cause flood damage, posing a serious threat to human residential areas and infrastructures. Seepage is one of the main factors leading to the ultimate failure of a levee. Also, large hydropower projects mostly adopt a scheme for dams of tens of meters or even more than 100 m in height. Changes in the seepage field will inevitably cause a change in seepage pressure, which will change the external load acting on the body of levees and dams, thus changing the distribution of the stress field of levees and dams. This leads to hydraulic fractures, deformation, and the instability of levees and dams in their entirety. Previous research has proposed the seepage-stress coupling model to analyze the effect of seepage on the safety of levees and dams [1,2]. The well-known break event of the Teton dam was the result of seepage failure [3]. Therefore, seepage pressure monitoring is a very important element for the safety and the stability of levees and dams.
Seepage pressure monitoring has changed to the precise measurement of automation and the construction of the levees and the dams with smart materials. The traditional monitoring method involves the use of the differential resistance electronic sensor, which is sensitive to electromagnetic disturbance, is moisture-proof, and is resistant to conductivity and corrosion problems. However, the requirements for waterproofing and other electrical parameters of wires and devices are very strict, and their long-term stability is poor. Therefore, it is very challenging to achieve high resolution and high accuracy measurement for the seepage pressure of levees and dams. The technology used for the seepage pressure monitoring of levees and dams is beginning to move towards optical fiber sensing technology so as to achieve the purpose of health monitoring of levees and dams. Optical fiber sensors are excellent candidates for constructing smart levees and dams because of many advantages of optical fiber sensing technology, such as their intrinsic safety, good insulation performance, strong immunity to electromagnetic interference, high sensitivity, high temperature resistance, and excellent distributed monitoring ability, and they are an effective way to address the seepage pressure monitoring problem of levees and dams. The Fabry–Perot interferometer (FPI) optical fiber pressure sensors have drawn great attention due to their high sensitivity and anti-polarization fading characteristic, and they have been extensively investigated in the fields of pressure [4,5,6] and strain [6,7,8,9] monitoring since 1988 [10]. The diaphragm-assisted FPI optical fiber sensors, which were first reported in 1991 [11], are the one of the important types of FPI sensor, and they have become the research focus in the field of acoustic wave [12,13], photo-acoustic spectroscopy [14,15], and for the improvement of performance parameters for dynamic and static pressure measurements [16,17,18,19,20]. The diaphragm-assisted configurations are more suitable for pressure measurement fields requiring high sensitivity and high resolution. However, diaphragm-assisted FPI optical fiber sensors are usually composed of several materials or several elements [15,17,18,20]. A mismatch in the coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) between materials will cause undesirable stresses to press against each other. The stress will degrade the performance of the FPI sensors and even cause their failure. Also, even if the diaphragm-assisted FPI optical fiber sensor configurations are made up of a kind of material, the current common bonding adhesive of epoxy [21] will influence the performance of sensor, and the adhesive of epoxy will decompose at high temperatures. Additionally, this will cause a large temperature dependence due to the adhesive of epoxy having a different CTE from the materials of the sensor. In order to improve performance, some of the FPI sensors are manufactured in a vacuum environment [22,23] or are composed of monolithic material [24,25]. The requirement of the fabrication in a vacuum is relatively high. The monolithic sapphire in literature [24] can eliminate the mismatch in CTE, but it is more expensive than fused-silica. Laser welding provides a technical method for the fabrication of optical fiber sensors based on monolithic fused-silica. The temperature dependence of optical fiber pressure sensors is quite significant and will lead to a relatively large measurement error. The specific temperature compensation method by fiber Bragg grating (FBG) was described in a previous publication [26] by our group. It is well known that FBG has a good temperature response, while the FPI sensor performs well in terms of sensitivity to pressure. Hence, the multiplexing of FBG and FPI can effectively reduce the error in pressure measurement. Additionally, to achieve higher resolution, the demodulation algorithm for demodulating FP cavity length has become a research focus, and a Vernier demodulation algorithm was reported by our group [27].
In this paper, an optical fiber pressure sensor cascading a diaphragm-assisted FPI and an FBG is proposed and demonstrated. Fabrication of all-laser-welding of FPI leads to the formation of a monolithic structure of all-fused-silica materials as the seepage pressure sensor. The FPI possesses an open FP cavity due to the CO2 laser deep penetration point welding between the single mode optical fiber (SMF) and the fused-silica ferrule, which eliminates the undesirable pressure on the inside surface of the diaphragm and improves the temperature stability of the sensors. The fused-silica diaphragm is welded on the ferrule end face by CO2 laser heat conduction welding. The FPI manufactured by all-laser-welding has a good performance and stability, because no adhesive of epoxy is involved. In order to avoid the measurement error induced by temperature change, FBG is spliced to be very close to the FP cavity. The temperature compensation by FBG is carried out.

2. Operating Principles and Fabrication of Sensor

2.1. Operating Principles

A cascaded sensor based on FPI and FBG is shown in Figure 1. The optical fiber end face and the inside surface of diaphragm constitute the two mirrors for the Fabry-Perot (FP) cavity. Light from the optical source propagates to the end face of SMF and is partly reflected, forming a reference light for the FPI, and then it propagates to the inside surface of the diaphragm and is also partly reflected, forming a sensing light of the FPI. The sensing light reflected back is coupled into the SMF and forms interference spectra with the reference light. The FP cavity length, L, is obtained by demodulating the interference spectra via a Vernier demodulation algorithm. For the FPI fiber sensor, the diaphragm will deflect due to the applied pressure. If the diaphragm is clamped in a rigid, round shape, the deflection of the diaphragm center, Y, under the applied pressure, P, can be expressed as [28]
Y = 3 ( 1 μ 2 ) P 16 E h 3 ( a 2 r 2 ) 2 ,
where μ, E, h, and a are the Poisson’s ratio, the Young’s modulus, the thickness, and the effective radius of diaphragm, respectively, and r is the radial distance to the diaphragm center. The L value will change with the deflection of the diaphragm when the environmental pressure is applied to the FPI sensor. Therefore, the interference pattern of FPI is modulated by the applied pressure, which will be used for the demodulation of the L value. After determining the material of the sensor, the sensitivity of the diaphragm-assisted FPI sensor, Y/P, depends on h and a. The desired sensitivity can be obtained by designing suitable a and h according to practical application and the preparation process.
The effective refractive index and the grating period of the FBG will vary when the temperature changes, so the Bragg wavelength, λB, is sensitive to temperature. The λB-shift, ΔλB, with temperature change, ΔT, can be expressed as
Δ λ B = 2 ( Λ n e f f T + n e f f Λ T ) Δ T ,
where Λ, neff, and T are the period of the FBG, the effective refractive index, and the environmental temperature. Accordingly, temperature variation can be simply acquired with the FBG by means of measuring the ΔλB of the FBG. The λB can be directly obtained by a peak search algorithm.

2.2. Fabrication of Seepage Pressure Sensor

The seepage pressure sensor consists of all-fused-silica materials, which are, respectively, SMF, a fused-silica ferrule with a conical cup, and a fused-silica diaphragm. The fused-silica ferrule is shown in Figure 2a–c. Figure 2a shows a side view micrograph, and Figure 2b depicts a top view micrograph of the conical cup end face. We used a femtosecond laser to fabricate a bowl-shaped pit in the non-conical end face, and the top view micrograph is shown in Figure 2c. The sensor was fabricated by CO2 laser (GEM-60, Coherent Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) welding, and the laser welding system is shown in Figure 3, where the pink dotted frame is for the heat conduction welding of the diaphragm, while the red dotted frame is for the deep penetration welding between the SMF and the inner wall of the ferrule. The diaphragm and the SMF were welded, in turn, to the end face and the inner wall of the ferrule. First, we welded the diaphragm onto the bowl-shaped end-surface of the ferrule by laser heat conduction welding. During welding, the ferrule and the diaphragm remain stationary while the laser beam rotates at 500 mm/s for 1000 circles. Next, we inserted a SMF connected to a sm125 (Optical Sensing Interrogator, Micron Optics Inc. Atlanta, GA, USA) into the through-hole of the ferrule, and then a FP cavity was constructed by the end-face of the SMF and the inside surface of the diaphragm. The FP cavity length was designed to be approximately 115 μm and is monitored in real-time by the sm125. The L value was calculated by our Vernier demodulation algorithm. At last, we fixed the SMF to the inner wall of the ferrule by laser deep-penetration point welding. During welding, the ferrule, the SMF, and the laser beam remain stationary. Laser deep-penetration welding causes a keyhole effect until the SMF is fixed on the inner wall of the ferrule. The microscope in Figure 3 is used to monitor the welding between the ferrule and the SMF. A schematic diagram of sensor is shown in Figure 1, where the inset on the left shows the deep penetration welding point of SMF, and the inset on the right illustrates the heat conduction welding of the diaphragm. The all-fused-silica structure for FPI can avoid the performance decline of the sensor due to materials pressing against each other due to the difference in CTE.

3. Experiment and Results

Figure 4 depicts the experimental system that was used to determine the pressure characteristics of the FPI sensor at different temperatures and to test the temperature characteristics of the FBG. The mixed FBG and FPI sensor was placed into a temperature furnace together with a platinum resistance thermometer. The temperature was displayed on a thermometer 1502A (Fluke Co., Everett, WA, USA) with an accuracy of 0.2 °C. The environmental temperature obtained by the FBG was used to compensate for the pressure measurement errors of the FPI sensor due to temperature variation. The light beam emitted by the sweeping laser in the sm125 was launched into the SMF, and then reached the FBG and the FPI in turn. Also, the sm125 was employed to monitor the returned spectra with an accuracy of 4 pm and a wavelength range of 1510–1590 nm, and this was displayed on the personal computer. The reflected mixed spectra of the FPI and the FBG are shown in Figure 5, where the spectrum peak corresponds to the FBG reflection wavelength and the periodic interference spectrum was produced by the FPI. The FP cavity length was calculated by the Vernier demodulation algorithm.
As described above, the FPI was used to measure the seepage pressure, while the FBG was only designed to measure the temperature of the environment. The pressure acting on the diaphragm was supplied by a hydraulic piston pressure gauge (3100 series, General Electric Co., Boston, MA, USA), and the pressure guide port of pressure conduction connector was connected to the oil tube for the hydraulic gauge, as shown in the test system depicted in Figure 5. The packaged sensor and its package structure are shown in Figure 6. The pressure characteristics of the sensor were demonstrated from 0 to 1 MPa with an interval of 0.1 MPa at different temperatures, and the temperature characteristics of FBG were measured from 26.4 to 5.6 °C. The temperature in the levee and the dam body is affected by the reservoir water, and the temperature is usually near or below the ordinary temperature. The seepage pressure response characteristics of FPI are shown in Figure 7 at 26.4, 16.5, 10.6, and 5.6 °C. The results show that the pressure of the FPI sensor has good linearity at different temperatures, and the sensitivity is about 1.732 nm/kPa. However, the seepage pressure has slightly differences at different temperatures due to the temperature-pressure cross-sensitivity of the sensor. The cross-sensitivity will lead to measurement error for pressure when the environmental temperature varies. The change in FP cavity length is shown in Figure 8 at 15 minutes at 0 MPa, and its standard deviation is 1.16 × 10−2 kPa. We used twice the standard deviation as the resolution of the FPI sensor, so the resolution of the sensor is 2.3 Pa.
In order to reduce the measurement error caused by the difference in pressure response at different temperatures, we used the environmental temperature obtained by the FBG for temperature compensation of the FPI. The temperature calibration curve of the FBG under atmospheric pressure is shown in Figure 9, and the temperature sensitivity is 0.011 nm/°C. After temperature compensation, the calibration curves of the FPI sensor at different temperatures were as shown in Figure 10. The seepage pressure measurement deviation caused by temperature-pressure cross-sensitivity of the FPI sensor was well compensated.
Hysteresis is an important performance factor for high accuracy monitoring of the seepage pressure of levees and dams. The measurement of pressure at a normal atmospheric temperature was continuously repeated for three cycles of forward and reverse travel, and the results are shown in Figure 11. The results indicate that the hysteresis error of the sensor is very small, and the maximum pressure deviation is 0.21 kPa in the range of 0–1 MPa.
To verify the long-term stability of the FPI sensor, we recorded the changes in cavity length over time each day, and the daily cavity length values are the result of the average cavity length measured at one hour intervals. Figure 12a,b depict the long-term stability of the FPI sensor for about one month at 0 MPa and 1 MPa, respectively. It can be seen from Figure 12 that the cavity length of the FPI sensor has good stability. The maximum pressure fluctuation is about 0.8 kPa, and there is no change trend in a single direction. Additionally, we interrupted the data acquisition on May 31 and resumed the data acquisition on June 5. Before re-collecting data, we artificially changed the pressure and then quickly recovered it to 0 MPa, so Figure 12a shows that the cavity length has a sudden change between the data for May 31 and June 5. This process of change indicates a sensitive response of the sensor to environmental pressure. The pressure response characteristics of the FPI seepage sensor on May 19 and June 19 are shown in Figure 13. The results illustrate that they are basically in accordance.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we presented an optical fiber pressure sensor cascading a diaphragm-assisted FPI and an FBG. The presented sensor consists of homogenous fused-silica materials and was fabricated by CO2 laser all-welding, which formed a seepage pressure sensor with a monolithic structure. The monolithic structure makes no difference to the CTE between materials, keeping the diaphragm and the ferrule from pressing each other and improving the performance of the sensor. Moreover, laser deep penetration point welding opens the FP cavity, resulting in there being no problem related to measurement error caused by residual air in the FP cavity squeezing the diaphragm due to temperature rise. The pressure of the monolithically structured FPI sensor has good linearity at different temperatures. We used the cascading FBG temperature sensor to compensate for the difference in seepage pressure responses at different temperatures due to the temperature-pressure cross-sensitivity of sensor. The resolution of the FPI sensor is 2.3 Pa. Additionally, the monolithically structured sensor possesses excellent hysteresis and long-term stability. The results show that both its resolution and stability are better than those of previously reported sensors using monolithic sapphire and stainless steel. The proposed sensor could be widely used to sense pressure in harsh environments, such as damp, corrosive, and high temperature environments due to its all-laser-welding.

Author Contributions

W.W. (Wenhua Wang) and X.Z. conceived the measurement; W.W. (Wenhua Wang) fabricated the sensors; X.Z. researched the demodulation algorithm, W.W. (Wenhua Wang), X.Z. and W.W. (Weina Wu) performed the experiments and elaborated the data; all authors analyzed the data and revised the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program for Undergraduate of GDOU (NO. CXLL2018178), China, the Science and Technology Planning of Guangdong Province (NO. 2015A030401094), China, and the Scientific Research Project for Innovation and Strengthening College Engineering of GDOU (NO. 2017052504), China.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tsang, Y.W.; Witherspoon, P.A. Hydromechanical behavior of a deformable rock fracture subject to normal stress. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 1981, 86, 9187–9198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Esaki, T.; Hojo, H.; Kimura, T.; Kameda, N. Shear-flow coupling test on rock joints. In Proceedings of the 7th international Congress on Rock Mechanics, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 16 September 1991; pp. 389–392. [Google Scholar]
  3. Busch, L.A. Experiencing the Teton dam failure. Int. Water Power Dam Constr. 2002, 54, 38–41. [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen, K.; Yu, Z.; Gong, Z.; Yu, Q. Lock-in white-light-interferometry-based all-optical photoacoustic spectrometer. Opt. Lett. 2018, 43, 5038–5041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zhang, Z.; He, J.; Du, B.; Zhang, F.; Guo, K.; Wang, P. Measurement of high pressure and high temperature using a dual-cavity Fabry–Perot interferometer created in cascade hollow-core fibers. Opt. Lett. 2018, 43, 6009–6012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Islam, M.; Ali, M.; Lai, M.H.; Lim, K.S.; Ahmad, H. Chronology of Fabry-Perot Interferometer Fiber-Optic Sensors and Their Applications: A Review. Sensors 2014, 14, 7451–7488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kersey, A.D.; Berkoff, T.A.; Morey, W.W. Multiplexed fiber Bragg grating strain-sensor system with a fiber Fabry–Perot wavelength filter. Opt. Lett. 1993, 18, 1370–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Murphy, K.A.; Gunther, M.F.; Vengsarkar, A.; Claus, R.O. Quadrature phase-shifted, extrinsic Fabry–Perot optical fiber sensors. Opt. Lett. 1991, 16, 273–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Huang, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Chen, X.; Wang, A. Intrinsic Fabry-Perot fiber sensor for temperature and strain measurements. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2005, 17, 2403–2405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lee, C.; Taylor, H.F. Interferometric optical fibre sensors using internal mirrors. Electron. Lett. 1988, 24, 193–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wolthuis, R.; Mitchell, G.; Saaski, E.; Hartl, J.; Afromowitz, M. Development of medical pressure and temperature sensors employing optical spectrum modulation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1991, 38, 974–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ma, J.; Xuan, H.; Ho, H.L.; Jin, W.; Yang, Y.; Fan, S. Fiber-Optic Fabry-Perot Acoustic Sensor with Multilayer Graphene Diaphragm. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2013, 25, 932–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chen, K.; Gong, Z.; Guo, M.; Yu, S.; Qu, C.; Zhou, X.; Yu, Q. Fiber-optic Fabry–Perot interferometer based high sensitive cantilever microphone. Sens. Actuators: A 2018, 279, 107–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gong, Z.; Chen, K.; Yang, Y.; Zhou, X.; Yu, Q. Photoacoustic spectroscopy based multi-gas detection using high-sensitivity fiber-optic low-frequency acoustic sensor. Sens. Actuators B 2018, 260, 357–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gong, Z.; Ke, C.; Zhou, X.; Yang, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Zou, H.; Yu, Q. High-Sensitivity Fabry–Perot Interferometric Acoustic Sensor for Low-Frequency Acoustic Pressure Detections. J. Lightwave Technol. 2017, 35, 5276–5279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ma, J.; Jin, W.; Ho, H.L.; Dai, J.Y. High-sensitivity fiber-tip pressure sensor with graphene diaphragm. Opt. Lett. 2012, 37, 2493–2495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Zhu, C.; Chen, Y.; Zhuang, Y.; Fang, G.; Liu, X.; Huang, J. Optical Interferometric Pressure Sensor Based on a Buckled Beam with Low-Temperature Cross-Sensitivity. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2018, 67, 950–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhu, J.; Wang, M.; Chen, L.; Ni, X.; Ni, H. An optical fiber Fabry–Perot pressure sensor using corrugated diaphragm and angle polished fiber. Opt. Fiber Technol. 2017, 34, 42–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Donlagic, D.; Cibula, E. All-fiber high-sensitivity pressure sensor with SiO2 diaphragm. Opt. Lett. 2005, 30, 2071–2073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Li, C.; Yu, X.; Lan, T.; Liu, J.; Fan, S. Insensitivity to Humidity in Fabry–Perot Sensor with Multilayer Graphene Diaphragm. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2018, 30, 565–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Eom, J.; Park, C.J.; Lee, B.H.; Lee, J.H.; Kwon, I.B.; Chung, E. Fiber optic Fabry–Perot pressure sensor based on lensed fiber and polymeric diaphragm. Sens. Actuators A 2015, 225, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shi, J.; Wang, Y.; Xu, D.; He, Y.; Jiang, J.; Xu, W.; Zhang, H.; Su, G.; Yan, C.; Yan, D.; et al. Remote Gas Pressure Sensor Based on Fiber Ring Laser Embedded with Fabry-Pérot Interferometer and Sagnac Loop. IEEE Photonics J. 2016, 5, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xu, J.; Pickrell, G.R.; Wang, X.; Yu, B.; Cooper, K.L.; Wang, A. Vacuum-sealed high temperature high bandwidth fiber optic pressure and acoustic sensors. SPIE 2005, 5998, 599809. [Google Scholar]
  24. Yi, J.; Lally, E.; Wang, A.; Xu, Y. Demonstration of an All-Sapphire Fabry–Perot Cavity for Pressure Sensing. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2011, 23, 9–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yi, J. Adhesive-free bonding of monolithic sapphire for pressure sensing in extreme environments. Sensors 2018, 18, 2712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zhou, X.; Yu, Q. Wide-Range Displacement Sensor Based on Fiber-Optic Fabr-Perot Interferometer for Subnanometer Measurement. IEEE Sens. J. 2011, 11, 1602–1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Giovanni, M.D. Flat and Corrugated Diaphragm Design Handbook; Mercel Dekker: New York, NY, USA, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  28. Zhou, X.; Yu, Q.; Peng, W. Simultaneous measurement of down-hole pressure and distributed temperature with single fiber. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2012, 23, 085102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the cascaded sensor of the Fabry-Perot interferometer (FPI) and the fiber Bragg grating (FBG); inset on the left: deep penetration point welding between the single mode optical fiber (SMF) and the ferrule; inset on the right: heat conduction welding of diaphragm.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the cascaded sensor of the Fabry-Perot interferometer (FPI) and the fiber Bragg grating (FBG); inset on the left: deep penetration point welding between the single mode optical fiber (SMF) and the ferrule; inset on the right: heat conduction welding of diaphragm.
Materials 12 00552 g001
Figure 2. Photo micrograph of the fused-silica ferrule: (a) side view, (b) and (c) top view of end face for the conical cup and bowl-shaped pit in the non-conical end face.
Figure 2. Photo micrograph of the fused-silica ferrule: (a) side view, (b) and (c) top view of end face for the conical cup and bowl-shaped pit in the non-conical end face.
Materials 12 00552 g002
Figure 3. Laser welding system for fabrication of the FPI sensor. The pink dotted frame is for the heat conduction welding of diaphragm, while the red dotted frame is for the deep penetration point welding between the SMF and the inner wall of the ferrule.
Figure 3. Laser welding system for fabrication of the FPI sensor. The pink dotted frame is for the heat conduction welding of diaphragm, while the red dotted frame is for the deep penetration point welding between the SMF and the inner wall of the ferrule.
Materials 12 00552 g003
Figure 4. Calibration/test system for the pressure/temperature of the FPI/FBG multiplexing sensor.
Figure 4. Calibration/test system for the pressure/temperature of the FPI/FBG multiplexing sensor.
Materials 12 00552 g004
Figure 5. Illustration of the mixed spectra of the FPI/FBG multiplexing sensor.
Figure 5. Illustration of the mixed spectra of the FPI/FBG multiplexing sensor.
Materials 12 00552 g005
Figure 6. (a) The packaged FPI/FBG sensor and (b) its packaged structure.
Figure 6. (a) The packaged FPI/FBG sensor and (b) its packaged structure.
Materials 12 00552 g006
Figure 7. Pressure response characteristics of the FPI/FBG seepage pressure sensor at different temperatures.
Figure 7. Pressure response characteristics of the FPI/FBG seepage pressure sensor at different temperatures.
Materials 12 00552 g007
Figure 8. Measurement standard deviation of the FPI sensor.
Figure 8. Measurement standard deviation of the FPI sensor.
Materials 12 00552 g008
Figure 9. Temperature characteristics of the FBG.
Figure 9. Temperature characteristics of the FBG.
Materials 12 00552 g009
Figure 10. Calibration curves for the FPI/FBG pressure sensor at different temperatures after temperature compensation; inset: enlargement at 0.4 MPa.
Figure 10. Calibration curves for the FPI/FBG pressure sensor at different temperatures after temperature compensation; inset: enlargement at 0.4 MPa.
Materials 12 00552 g010
Figure 11. Hysteresis for the FPI/FBG seepage pressure sensor; inset: enlargement at 0.6 MPa.
Figure 11. Hysteresis for the FPI/FBG seepage pressure sensor; inset: enlargement at 0.6 MPa.
Materials 12 00552 g011
Figure 12. Long-term stability of the FPI/FBG seepage pressure sensor at (a) 0 MPa and (b) 1 MPa.
Figure 12. Long-term stability of the FPI/FBG seepage pressure sensor at (a) 0 MPa and (b) 1 MPa.
Materials 12 00552 g012
Figure 13. Pressure response characteristics of the FPI seepage sensor on May 19 and June 19.
Figure 13. Pressure response characteristics of the FPI seepage sensor on May 19 and June 19.
Materials 12 00552 g013

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, W.; Zhou, X.; Wu, W.; Chen, J.; He, S.; Guo, W.; Gao, J.; Huang, S.; Chen, X. Monolithic Structure-Optical Fiber Sensor with Temperature Compensation for Pressure Measurement. Materials 2019, 12, 552. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12040552

AMA Style

Wang W, Zhou X, Wu W, Chen J, He S, Guo W, Gao J, Huang S, Chen X. Monolithic Structure-Optical Fiber Sensor with Temperature Compensation for Pressure Measurement. Materials. 2019; 12(4):552. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12040552

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Wenhua, Xinlei Zhou, Weina Wu, Jihua Chen, Shenlong He, Weifeng Guo, Junbin Gao, Shaoxin Huang, and Xuanhua Chen. 2019. "Monolithic Structure-Optical Fiber Sensor with Temperature Compensation for Pressure Measurement" Materials 12, no. 4: 552. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12040552

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop