Next Article in Journal
The Effect of Inner Friction on Concrete Fracture Behavior under Biaxial Compression: A 3D Mesostructure Study
Next Article in Special Issue
The Effect of the ZrO2 Loading in SiO2@ZrO2-CaO Catalysts for Transesterification Reaction
Previous Article in Journal
Theoretical Study on the Aggregation of Copper Clusters on a Liquid Surface
Previous Article in Special Issue
Impact of Support (MCF, ZrO2, ZSM-5) on the Efficiency of Ni Catalyst in High-Temperature Conversion of Lignocellulosic Biomass to Hydrogen-Rich Gas
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 12
Issue 23
10.3390/ma12233878
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Magnetic Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt and Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt@SiO2 Structures for HDN of Indole

by
Robinson Dinamarca
1,2,
Verónica Valles
3,
Brenda Ledesma
3,
Cristian H. Campos
1,
Gina Pecchi
1,4 and
Andrea Beltramone
3,*
1
Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad de Concepción, Edmundo Larenas 129, 4030000 Casilla 160-C, Concepción, Chile
2
Facultad de Educación, Universidad de Concepción, Chile
3
Centro de Investigación en Nanociencia y Nanotecnología (NANOTEC), Facultad Regional Córdoba, Universidad Tecnológica Nacional, Maestro López y Cruz Roja Argentina, 5016, Córdoba, Argentina
4
Millenium Nuclei on Catalytic Processes towards Sustainable Chemistry (CSC), Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Av Libertador Bernardo O’Higgins 340 (3542000) Santiago, Chile
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2019, 12(23), 3878; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12233878
Submission received: 1 November 2019 / Revised: 18 November 2019 / Accepted: 21 November 2019 / Published: 24 November 2019
(This article belongs to the Collection Catalysts: Preparation, Catalytic Performance and Catalytic Reaction)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The effect of a second porous SiO2 shell in the activity and selectivity of the Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt catalyst in the hydrodenitrogenation of indole is reported. The double Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt@SiO2 structure was prepared by coating Fe3O4 nanoparticles with tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) with a further impregnation of 1.0 wt.% of Pt on the (3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane functionalized Fe3O4@SiO2 structures. The second porous SiO2 shell, obtained by using a hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) template, covered the Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt catalyst with a well-defined and narrow pore-sized distribution. The full characterization by TEM, inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES), XRD, and N2 adsorption isotherm at 77 K and vibrating sample magnetometry (VSM) of the catalysts indicates homogeneous core@shell structures with a controlled nano-size of metallic Pt. A significant effect of the double SiO2 shell in the catalytic performance was demonstrated by both a higher activity to eliminate the nitrogen atom of the indole molecule present in model liquid fuel and the improvement of the catalytic stability reaching four consecutive reaction cycles with only a slight conversion level decrease.

1. Introduction

The presence of polyaromatic and cyclic compounds in diesel negatively affects the environment and reduces the quality of diesel, as well as lowers the cetane number, which is indicative of the ease of ignition thereof. Hydrotreatment is one of the most efficient methods for the removal of N and S from refinery currents, as well as for the saturation of alkenes and aromatics [1,2,3,4]. It is important to highlight the multiplicity of reactions that come into play in hydrotreatment in this area of study. Taking into account the different elements that are considered contaminants in the refining processes of the petrochemical industry, within hydrotreatment we can distinguish hydrodesulfurization (HDS), hydrodenitrogenation (HDN), hydrodeoxygenation (HDO), hydrodemetalization (HDM), and hydrodearomatization (HDA). The HDS has been extensively studied because sulfur is a pollutant that is present in higher proportions in crude oils of lower quality and also as an important catalyst deactivator because of poisoning [5,6,7,8,9]. However, removal of nitrogen from organic compounds present in various fractions of crudes is harder than sulfur removal, which leads to the importance of the study of the HDN reaction. In this process of heterogeneous catalysis, the industry currently uses variations of the following combinations: Co(Ni)Mo(W)/Al2O3. In this arch for highly active and selective hydrotreatment catalysts for the oil industry, there are numerous works based on catalysts mainly with noble metals as active sites, since although they have a higher cost, the high conversions achieved justify their promising uses. Likewise, our previous works have shown that the acid support, the formation of bimetallic alloys, and the introduction of heteroatoms can greatly improve the performance of deposited metals in the active phase [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. In this way of looking for more efficient catalysts, the supports with large surface areas have been greatly studied since they can achieve a great dispersion of the active phase, significantly improving the yield of the reactions. In this sense, the support materials have been the protagonists of various studies. Among the most studied are metal oxides, such as Al2O3 [4,5,6,7,8,9], and materials with different degrees of porosity, such as MCM (Mobil Composition of Matter), SBA, Santa Barbara Amorphous type material and zeolites [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18].
Among the challenges that arise in the development of catalysts for the refining of crude oil, the factors associated with their reuse are decisive, including the characteristics that allow the separation of the catalyst from the reaction medium, as well as its recovery and the degree of activity that can be maintained in multiple reaction cycles. Accordingly, other interesting catalysts are core-shell nanoparticles (CSNs), designated as core@shell, that are formed with nuclei (inner materials) and shells (external material) at nanoscale. These types of materials have many applications, specifically in the field of heterogeneous catalysis, allowing the design, both in terms of the core and the casing, to achieve synergy between the two towards greater efficiency, yield, and selectivity. Depending on the constituent materials, they can be classified as CSN combinations of core shell: inorganic/inorganic, organic/organic, inorganic/organic, and inorganic/organic. Organic CSNs require polymerization techniques to prepare the organic core, shell, or both, while inorganic CSNs can be categorized as silica-based CSNs and metal-based CSNs. Silica-based CSNs have been extensively studied because silica is considered inert, that is, a simple dispersant of the active phase, although some authors have shown that they can react with metal precursors to form silicates of Ni, Co, Cu, Zn, and Ce with different reactivity [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. Core@shell silica microspheres with ultra-small encapsulated nanoparticles of Pd have been highlighted as efficient and easily recyclable for the catalytic hydrogenation of various groups of olefins, alkynes, keto, and nitro groups [28,29]. One application of the combination of the properties of the core and the shell is the development of magnetically separable catalysts, a quality that represents a significant improvement when evaluating the reuse of a catalyst. Polshettiwar et al. [30] reported the synthesis of supported nanoparticles of Ni-ferrite with excellent magnetic recovery in hydrogenation and transfer hydrogenation reactions. Scähtz et al. [31] in their review article made an extensive analysis of various catalysts supported in ferrite nanoparticles, highlighting their properties for magnetic separation. The application of core@shell silica microspheres, with ultra-small encapsulated nanoparticles of Pt, in the catalytic hydrotreatment process was not found in the literature. The main objective of this work is to develop homogeneous core@shell structures with a controlled nano-size of metallic Pt and study the effect of the double SiO2 shell in the catalytic performance in the HDN of indole.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Synthesis

All reagents were used without purification or treatment provided; these were acquired from Sigma® (Darmstadt, Germany) and Merck® (Darmstadt, Germany) Company. The Fe3O4–NPs were synthesized by a solvothermal method following Long et al. [32], and FeCl3 (Merck®) was dissolved in a polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP K30, Sigma®) solution in ethylene glycol (EG, Merck®) with sodium acetate as nucleating agent. The mixture was transferred to a Teflon autoclave and isothermally treated at 200 °C for 8 h. The solid obtained was separated by magnetization and washed several times with absolute ethanol. The Fe3O4-core NPs were coated with SiO2 using the Stöber method [32]. Fe3O4–NPs were dispersed in a mixture of ethanol, water, and ammonia, and after that tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS, Merck®) was slowly added to the dispersion under stirring for 6 h. The Fe3O4@SiO2 solid was separated by magnetization and washed several times with an ethanol–water mixture. In order to promote an active Pt immobilization and dispersion on the surface of the material, the surface of the Fe3O4@SiO2 was functionalized with (3-aminopropyl)trimethoxysilane (AMPTS, Merck®, 1 mL g−1 of solid), a coupling agent refluxing in toluene for 24 h under mechanical stirring. The solid was separated by magnetization, washed with a toluene–acetone mixture, and dried in an oven at 50 °C for 12 h. The functionalized material was dispersed in a K2PtCl6 (Merck®) solution with an amount of precursor necessary to produce 1.0 wt.% systems with respect to Fe3O4@SiO2. The material was placed in contact with the solution for 3 h under mechanical stirring and then reduced with a fresh solution of NaBH4 (Merck®). The second coating of SiO2 was deposited on the Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt surface by a modified Stöber method reported previously [33] using TEOS as a precursor, triethanolamine (TEA) as a basic catalyst, and hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB, Sigma®) as a stabilized and soft template. Finally, the CTAB template was removed by ion exchange using ammonium nitrate in ethanol dissolution under reflux conditions, obtaining the Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt@mSiO2 material.

2.2. Characterization

The morphology and microanalysis of the structures were studied by scanning transmission electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (STEM-EDS) using an FEI Tecnai ST F20 microscope (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) operating at 200 kV. Up to 300 individual metal particles were counted for each catalyst, and the surface area-weighted mean Pt diameter (dp) was calculated using the software ImageJ 1.48 (Wayne Rasband, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). Adsorption isotherms were obtained at 77 K in a Micromeritics ASAP 2010 instrument (Norcross, GA, USA). X-ray powder diffraction profiles were obtained in a Rigaku Diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å) and a nickel filter (Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan). The magnetic behavior was studied using a Lakeshore series 7400 vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) in an applied field of 20 kOe at 27 °C (Lakeshore, New Orleans, LA, USA). Pt and Fe contents were determined by inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) with a Perkin–Elmer Optima 2100 DV instrument (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA). The catalyst contents were determined after digestion in a 1:3 mixture of HNO3:HCl. X-ray source spectrophotometry (XPS) was obtained on a STAIB Instruments brand RQ-300 X-ray Source spectrophotometer (XPS RQ300/2, StaibInstrumente GmbH, Langenbach, Germany). The monochromatic radiation used as an excitation source is that of Al Kα (hν = 11486.6 eV) operated at 75 W.

2.3. Catalytic Activity

The hydrodenitrogenation reactions of indole were carried out at 250 °C and 15 atm of H2 and 500 rpm in a 600 mL stirred autoclave (Parr Pressure Reactor 4536, Parr Instrument Company, Moline, IL, USA). The typical procedure was as follows: 150 ppm of N as indole was dissolved in 50 mL of dodecane (0.01 mol L−1). The mixture was placed into the autoclave and the catalyst (250 mg) was transferred to the reactor. The reaction time was 8 h; samples were taken every hour. The products were analyzed with a HP 5890 Series II GC and HP-5 capillary column and identified by GC/MS.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization

Figure 1 presents the high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) for the image sequence obtained at each step of the catalyst synthesis; the Fe3O4-core image is shown in Figure 1a. Figure 1b reveals that the CSNs, where the Fe3O4 core is covered by a layer of SiO2, were close to 45 nm thick (Table 1). In Figure 1c,d, a successful impregnation-reduction process obtaining Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt and Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt@mSiO2 catalysts can be seen, respectively. Both catalysts present similar Pt size distribution and an average particle size of 3.5 nm (Table 1). The SiO2 coating generated by the Stöber method did not modify the distribution or increase the average size of the Pt–NPs on the surface of the material. The micrographs show the formation of a uniform coating on the surface of both catalysts, with channels perpendicular to the surface that correspond to the porosity of the material formed during the removal of the organic CTAB template used as a porosity directing agent. The preferential alignment of the surfactant and the silica oligomer with the core@shell in the performed structures is noticeable.
The catalysts were characterized by ICP-OES to determine the Pt content, as summarized in Table 1. The Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt catalyst contains slightly lower Pt than the nominal value, while for the Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt@mSiO2 catalysts the Pt loading is largely lower than the nominal. The larger difference in the Pt content for Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt@mSiO2 is attributed to the second mSiO2 shell of core@shell particles and not due to the leaching effect. When the mesoporous SiO2 shell is coated around the Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt structures, a uniform increase in the size of the second shell is observed, reaching 51 nm of thickness in mean diameter (see Table 1). The increase of the thickness provides a dilution of the Pt active phase compared to the Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt structures, in the same way as the increase of the SiO2 shell thickness.
Figure 2 illustrates the XRD patterns of the synthesized materials. All systems show the diffraction peaks characteristic of magnetite, Fe3O4 (JCPDS 19-0629) [34]. The Fe3O4 phase was not modified during the SiO2 coating. This finding indicates that the crystalline phase of the material is restricted to the magnetite core. Only for the Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt is a diffraction peak at 2θ = 39° detected, corresponding to the surface metallic Pt (JCPDS 04–0802). The low intensity of this signal is attributed to the average particle size of the Pt clusters below the detection limit of the XRD technique. The high dispersion of the Pt crystalline phase is in line with the homogenous distribution of Pt–NPs on the surface of the SiO2 shell observed by HR-TEM, and the surface XPS technique confirms the presence of metallic Pt (see below).
Figure 3 shows the spectra of Pt 4f7/2 for the Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt catalyst, with a BE of 70.9 eV attributed to the metallic Pt species. Surface metallic Pt was not detected in the system with the second SiO2 coating; this was attributed to the coverage with the second shell.
Table 1 presents the results obtained for SBET calculated from the N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms at 77 K shown in Figure 4. The Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt shows an isotherm typical of type II materials and a SBET value of 11 m2 g−1. After the deposition of the second shell, the isotherm changes to mesoporous type IV materials with a large increase in the specific area. The catalyst Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt@mSiO2 displayed an isotherm type IV with a hysteresis loop type H3 pores typical for cylindrical pores according to the IUPAC (International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry) classification [35]. The isotherm exhibits two distinguished inflections in the adsorbed amount. The first one at P/P0 = 0.4–0.6 is attributed to the pores created after CTAB micelles removal [36,37], and the second one at P/P0 close to 0.8 which can be ascribed rather to the effect of interparticle voids present between some coalesced aggregates of the material [38]. The pore size distribution shows a bimodal distribution with a narrow distribution centered at 3.8 nm and a wider distribution centered at 14 nm associated with the interstitial spaces of the aggregates of the particles. The narrow distribution of mesopores at 3.8 nm is attributed to the removed CTAB organic template. These results are in line with both the shape of isotherm’s hysteresis loop and the TEM characterization for the observed core@shell aggregates.
Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt and Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt@mSiO2 materials exhibit the ferromagnetic properties of the started Fe3O4–NPs, as can be seen in Figure 5. The magnetic saturation (Ms) value of the Fe3O4–NPs changes with subsequent coverage, due to the relative decrease of Fe3O4 content with respect to the presence of the SiO2 shell. The Fe3O4 core corresponds to magnetization curves with an absence of a hysteresis cycle, characteristic of superparamagnetic materials. The decrease of the Ms of 91 emug−1 for magnetite phase (Fe3O4) to 45 emu g−1 for Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt and 25 emu g−1 for Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt@mSiO2 is a result of the effect of the coating with SiO2. Even though the relative lower range of value of Ms 25–45 emug−1 was enough for the efficient removal below 1 min of the micro-sized particles, it reflected the ability of these catalysts to respond to an external magnetic field, which allows for quick separation from the liquid phase [39].

3.2. Catalytic Activity

The reaction network of the hydrodenitrogenation of indole proposed by Zhang and Ozkan is shown in Scheme 1 [40]. According to this pathway, ethylcyclohexane (ECH) and ethylbenzene (EB) are the two main products from HDN of indole. Path 1 indicates the hydrogenolysis of indoline (HIN) to o-ethylaniline (OEA) and path 2 indicates the hydrogenation of indoline (HIN) to octahydroindole (OHIN). A secondary route from o-ethylaniline (OEA) (path 3) to o-ethylcyclohexylamine (OECHA) and then to ethylcyclohexene (ECHE) is also included. The only identified products, after the experiments performed in this work, were indoline (HIN), o-ethylaniline (OEA), ethylbenzene (EB), and ethylcyclohexane (ECH); these accounted for almost 95% of the total products.
Figure 6 shows the conversion of indole as a function of time for the two synthesized catalysts. It is clearly observed that the catalyst with the mesoporous silica coating Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt@mSiO2 is much more active than the uncoated catalyst, reaching a complete conversion at 8 h of reaction, while Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt only reaches 50% conversion. Figure 7 shows the molar fraction of the reaction system for both catalysts. In the case of Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt (Figure 7a), we can observe that indoline is formed first, then OEA, and that the appearance of EB and ECH is very slow. Contrary for Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt@mSiO2 (Figure 7b), the consumption of indole and the appearance of EB and especially ECH (the denitrogenated products) is very fast. The percentage of denitrogenated products (% HDN) was calculated and listed in Table 2. In the table, the results were compared with those of a typical HDN catalyst NiMo/Al2O3 Criterion DN200 [11]. This catalyst was presulfided according to our previously reported results [11]. Catalyst Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt@mSiO2 reached a higher % HDN value compared with the other two catalysts. A control reaction was carried out using Fe3O4@SiO2 as a catalyst under the same conditions and no activity was obtained, confirming the non-catalytic activity of the support.
The better activity of Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt@mSiO2 compared with the NiMo/Al2O3 catalyst can be related to the high hydrogenating capacity of platinum in Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt@mSiO2. In the case of both core@shell structures, it is very clear that the difference in activity is due to the presence of the second porous shell and not to the dispersion of the platinum nanoparticles.
The large difference in activity has to be explained in relation to the presence of the mesoporous silica layer and in the greater surface area of Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt@mSiO2 compared with Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt. Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt@mSiO2 possesses cylindrical channels perpendicular to the surface that corresponds to the porosity of the material formed during the removal of the organic template. The synthesis of such coating was carried out using triethanolamine (TEA), which confers a basic property, leading to a negatively charged surface of the SiO2. Moreover, due to the removal of CTAB that was performed by ion exchange using ammonium nitrate in ethanol dissolution, this exchange by NH4+ cations enables adherence as counterions. The presence of these cations generates a slight surface acidity in the porous SiO2 of the second coating [41] which benefits HDN reactions, as we have reported previously [11]. This is also evidenced in the larger amount of ECH with respect to EB for the Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt@mSiO2 catalyst, similar to other acid catalysts [11]. On the other hand, in line with previous reports for heterogeneous core-shell catalysts with porous coatings, the porosity of the second coating generates a confinement effect into the cylindrical pores that favor the adsorption of the reactants and the re-adsorption of the intermediates of the reaction, increasing the contact time between intermediates and the platinum active catalytic species [42].

Reutilization Study

Catalyst reuse is important from an industrial point of view. In this case, the catalysts have been tested during four catalytic cycles. The samples were washed several times with a mixture of methanol and water previous to the reaction. Figure 8 shows that the activity slightly decreases after the third recycle in the case of Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt@mSiO2, but the loss in activity is higher in the case of Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt. The higher stability of Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt@mSiO2 could be due to the presence of the second porous silica coating that inhibits the loss of the metal charge and prevents sintering. The stabilization achieved after the second layer of silica allows the successive reuse of the catalyst. In addition, the magnetic characteristics of this catalyst facilitates the separation process, which is very important from the practical and economic perspective in any industrial process.

4. Conclusions

In this work, we studied the effect of a second porous SiO2 shell in the activity and selectivity of the Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt catalyst in the hydrodenitrogenation of indole. The core–shell structures were applied for the first time in the indole HDN process. We found that the presence of a mesoporous SiO2 coating dramatically increases the activity of the catalyst. The great difference in activity was explained in terms of a confinement effect of the intermediate’s products of the reaction in the second SiO2 layer. This coating of slightly acidic character, and with parallel mesochannels, favored the re-adsorption and transformation into denitrogenated products, allowing the Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt@mSiO2 catalyst to remain active after several catalytic cycles, and its magnetic character allows its easy separation and recovery.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.P., C.H.C., and A.B.; methodology, formal analysis, and investigation R.D., V.V., and B.L.; writing—original draft preparation R.D., V.V.; writing—review and editing, G.P, C.H.C. and A.B.; supervision, G.P., C.H.C, and A.B.; project administration, G.P.; funding acquisition, G.P.

Funding

This research was funded by CONICYT-Chile grant Fondecyt 1170083.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Egorova, M.; Prins, R. Competitive hydrodesulfurization of 4,6-dimethyldibenzothiophene, hydrodenitrogenation of 2-methylpyridine, and hydrogenation of naphthalene over sulfided NiMo/γ-Al2O3. J. Catal. 2004, 224, 2782–2787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Egorova, M.; Prins, R. Mutual influence of the HDS of dibenzothiophene and HDN of 2-methylpyridine. J. Catal. 2004, 221, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nassreddine, S.; Massin, L.; Aouine, M.; Geantet, C.; Piccolo, L. Thiotolerant Ir/SiO2–Al2O3 bifunctional catalysts: Effect of metal—Acid site balance on tetralin hydroconversion. J. Catal. 2011, 278, 253–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kishore Kumar, S.A.; John, M.; Pai, S.M.; Niwate, Y.; Newalkar, B.L. Low temperatura hydrogenation of aromaticsover Pt–Pd/SiO2–Al2O3 catalyst. Fuel Process. Technol. 2014, 128, 303–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jongpatiwut, S.; Li, Z.; Resasco, D.E.; Alvarez, W.; Sughrue, E.; Dodwell, G. Competitive hydrogenation of poly-aromatic hydrocarbons on sulfur-resistant bimetallic Pt-Pd catalysts. Appl. Catal. 2004, 262, 241–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Stanislaus, A.; Marafi, A.; Rana, M.S. Recent advances in the science and technology of ultra low sulfur diesel (ULSD) production. Catal. Today 2010, 153, 1–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lebeau, B.; Bonne, M.; Comparot, J.D.; Rousseau, J.; Michelin, L.; Blin, J.L.; Brunet, S. HDS of 4,6-dimethyldibenzothiophene overCoMoSsupportedmesoporous SiO2-TiO2 materials. Catal. Today 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Beltramone, A.R.; Resasco, D.E.; Alvarez, W.E.; Choudhary, T.V. Simultaneous Hydrogenation of Multiring Aromatic Compounds over NiMo Catalyst. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2008, 47, 7161–7166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cinibulk, J.; Vit, Z. Preparation of MO/Al2O3 sulfidecatalystsmodifiedby Ir nanoparticles. Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 2002, 143, 443–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ledesma, B.C.; Martínez, M.L.; Beltramone, A.R. Iridium-supported SBA-15 modifiedwith Ga and Al as a highly active catalyst in thehydrodenitrogenation of quinoline. Catal Today 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ledesma, B.C.; Anunziata, O.A.; Beltramone, A.R. HDN of indoleover Ir-modified Ti-SBA-15. Appl. Catal. B 2016, 192, 220–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Valles, V.A.; Ledesma, B.C.; Rivoira, L.P.; Cussa, J.; Anunziata, O.A.; Beltramone, A.R. Experimental designoptimization of the tetralin hydrogenationover Ir–Pt-SBA-15. Catal. Today 2016, 271, 140–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Valles, V.A.; Ledesma, B.C.; Juárez, J.; Gómez Costa, M.B.; Anunziata, O.A.; Beltramone, A.R. Noblebimetallicsupported CMK-3 as a novel catalystforhydrogenation of tetralin in thepresence of sulfur and nitrogen. Fuel 2017, 188, 155–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Valles, V.A.; Ledesma, B.C.; Pecchi, G.A.; Anunziata, O.A.; Beltramone, A.R. Hydrogenationof tetralin in presence of nitrogenusing a noble-bimetalliccoupleover a Ti-modifiedSBA-15. Catal. Today 2017, 282, 111–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ledesma, B.C.; Valles, V.A.; Rivoira, L.P.; Martínez, M.L.; Anunziata, O.A.; Beltramone, A.R. Hydrogenation of tetralin over Ir catalystssupportedontitania-modified SBA-16. Catal. Lett. 2014, 144, 783–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ledesma, B.C.; Juárez, J.M.; Beltramone, A.R. Short time synthesis of titaniamodified-CMK-3 carbonmesostructure as supportfor Ir-catalystapplied in catalytic hydrotreating. Catal. Today 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Valles, V.A.; Balangero Bottazzi, G.; Martínez, M.L.; Gómez Costa, M.B.; Anunziata, O.A.; Beltramone, A.R. Hydrogenation of Tetralin over Ir-Containing Mesoporous Catalysts. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51, 7185–7195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Meynen, V.; Cool, P.; Vansant, E.F. Verifiedsyntheses of mesoporousmaterials. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2009, 125, 170–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pachon, L.D.; Rothenberg, G. Transition-metal nanoparticles: Synthesis, stability and the leaching issue. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2008, 22, 2882–2899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Burattin, P.; Che, M.; Louis, C.J. Characterization of the Ni(II) Phase Formed on Silica Upon Deposition−Precipitation. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 7060–7074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, N.; Xu, Y.-J. Aggregation- and Leaching-Resistant, Reusable, and Multifunctional Pd@CeO2 as a Robust Nanocatalyst Achieved by a Hollow Core–Shell Strategy. Chem. Mater. 2013, 25, 1979–1988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, B.; Chen, B.; Wang, Y.; Guo, F.; Li, Z.; Shi, D. Preparation of highly fluorescent magnetic nanoparticles for analytes-enrichment and subsequent biodetection. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 353, 426–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Fourmond, V.; Stapf, S.; Li, H.; Buesen, D.; Birrell, J.; Ruediger, O.; Lubitz, W.; Schuhmann, W.; Plumere, N.; Leger, C. Mechanism of Protection of Catalysts Supported in Redox Hydrogel Films. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 5494–5505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zhang, Y.; Li, P. Porous Zr-doped SiO2 shell/TiO2 core nanoparticles with expanded channels for photocatalysis. Mater. Des. 2015, 88, 1250–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Majewski, A.J.; Wood, J.; Bujalski, W. Nickel–silica core@shell catalyst for methane reforming. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2013, 38, 14531–14541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gawande, M.B.; Goswami, A.; Asefa, T.; Guo, H.; Biradar, A.V.; Peng, D.-L.; Zboril, R.; Varma, R.S. Core–shell nanoparticles: Synthesis and applications in catalysis and electrocatalysis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 7540–7590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, X.; He, B.; Hu, Z.; Zeng, Z.; Han, S. Current advances in precious metal core–shell catalyst design. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2014, 15, 043502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Biradar, A.V.; Biradar, A.A.; Asefa, T. Silica–Dendrimer Core–Shell Microspheres with Encapsulated Ultrasmall Palladium Nanoparticles: Efficient and Easily Recyclable Heterogeneous Nanocatalysts. Langmuir 2011, 27, 14408–14418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shi, Y.-L.; Asefa, T. Tailored Core−Shell−Shell Nanostructures:  Sandwiching Gold Nanoparticles between Silica Cores and Tunable Silica Shells. Langmuir 2007, 23, 9455–9462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Polshettiwar, V.; Baruwati, B.; Varma, R.S. Nanoparticle-supported and magnetically recoverable nickel catalyst: A robust and economic hydrogenation and transfer hydrogenation protocol. Green Chem. 2009, 11, 127–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Scahtz, A.; Reiser, O.; Stark, W.J. Nanoparticles as Semi-Heterogeneous Catalyst Supports. Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16, 8950–8967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Long, Y.; Liang, K.; Niu, J.; Yuan, B.; Ma, J. Pt NPs immobilized on core–shell magnetite microparticles: Novel and highly efficient catalysts for the selective aerobic oxidation of ethanol and glycerol in water. Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 8660–8668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Yang, J.; Shen, D.; Wei, Y.; Li, W.; Zhang, F.; Kong, B.; Zhang, S.; Teng, W.; Fan, J.; Zhang, W.; et al. Monodisperse core-shell structured magnetic mesoporous aluminosilicate nanospheres with large dendritic mesochannels. Nano Res. 2015, 8, 2503–2514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, W.; Shen, F.; Hong, R. Solvothermal synthesis of magnetic Fe3O4 microparticles via self-assembly of Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Particuology 2011, 9, 179–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Thommes, M.; Kaneko, K.; Neimark, A.V.; Olivier, J.; Rodriguez-Reinoso, F.; Rouquerol, J.; Sing, K. Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 2015, 87, 1051–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Esmaeili, S.; Zanjanchi, M.; Golmojdeh, H.; Shariati, S. Synthesis, characterization and photocatalytic studies of MCM-41 mesoporous silica core-shells doped with selenium oxide and lanthanum ions. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2020, 292, 109714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Costa, J.A.; De Jesus, R.; Santos, D.; Mano, J.; Romão, L.; Paranhos, C. Recent progresses in the adsorption of organic, inorganic, and gas compounds by MCM-41-based mesoporous materials. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2020, 291, 109698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Reich, S.; Svidrytski, A.; Höltzel, A.; Wang, W.; Kübel, C.; Hlushkou, D.; Tallarek, U. Transport under confinement: Hindrance factors for diffusion in core-shell and fully porous particles with different mesopore space morphologies. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2019, 282, 188–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Teng, Z.; Su, X.; Chen, G.; Tian, C.; Li, H.; Ai, L.; Lu, G. Superparamagnetic high-magnetization composite microspheres with Fe3O4@SiO2 core and highly crystallized mesoporous TiO2 shell. Colloid Surf. A 2012, 402, 60–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, L.; Ozkan, U.S. Hydrodenitrogenation of indole over NiMo sulfide catalysts. Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 1996, 101, 1223–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lanzafame, P.; Barbera, K.; Papanikolaou, G.; Perathoner, S.; Centi, G.; Migliori, M.; Catizzone, E.; Giordano, G. Comparison of H+ and NH4+ forms of zeolites as acid catalysts for HMF etherification. Catal. Today 2018, 304, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bao, J.; He, J.; Zhang, Y.; Yoneyama, Y.; Tsubaki, N. A Core/Shell Catalyst Produces a Spatially Confined Effect and Shape Selectivity in a Consecutive Reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2008, 47, 353–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Materials 12 03878 g001 550
Figure 1. HR-TEM of the synthesized Fe3O4–NPs and core@shell structures. (a) Fe3O4; (b) Fe3O4@SiO2; (c) Fe3O4@SiO2-Pt; (d) Fe3O4@SiO2-Pt@mSiO2.
Figure 1. HR-TEM of the synthesized Fe3O4–NPs and core@shell structures. (a) Fe3O4; (b) Fe3O4@SiO2; (c) Fe3O4@SiO2-Pt; (d) Fe3O4@SiO2-Pt@mSiO2.
Materials 12 03878 g001
Materials 12 03878 g002 550
Figure 2. XRD of the synthesized Fe3O4–NPs and core@shell structures.
Figure 2. XRD of the synthesized Fe3O4–NPs and core@shell structures.
Materials 12 03878 g002
Materials 12 03878 g003 550
Figure 3. X-ray source spectrophotometry (XPS) of the Pt 4f7/2 of the Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt core@shell structure.
Figure 3. X-ray source spectrophotometry (XPS) of the Pt 4f7/2 of the Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt core@shell structure.
Materials 12 03878 g003
Materials 12 03878 g004 550
Figure 4. N2 adsorption isotherms and pore size distribution of the core@shell structures.
Figure 4. N2 adsorption isotherms and pore size distribution of the core@shell structures.
Materials 12 03878 g004
Materials 12 03878 g005 550
Figure 5. Vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) of the synthesized Fe3O4–NPs and core@shell structures.
Figure 5. Vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) of the synthesized Fe3O4–NPs and core@shell structures.
Materials 12 03878 g005
Materials 12 03878 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Reaction pathways for hydrodenitrogenation (HDN) of indole: indole (IND), indoline (HIN), o-ethylaniline (OEA), ethylbenzene (EB), octahydroindole (OHIN), o-ethylcyclohexylamine (OECHA), ethylcyclohexene (ECHE), and ethylcyclohexane (ECH).
Scheme 1. Reaction pathways for hydrodenitrogenation (HDN) of indole: indole (IND), indoline (HIN), o-ethylaniline (OEA), ethylbenzene (EB), octahydroindole (OHIN), o-ethylcyclohexylamine (OECHA), ethylcyclohexene (ECHE), and ethylcyclohexane (ECH).
Materials 12 03878 sch001
Materials 12 03878 g006 550
Figure 6. Indole conversion over the synthesized catalysts.
Figure 6. Indole conversion over the synthesized catalysts.
Materials 12 03878 g006
Materials 12 03878 g007 550
Figure 7. Molar fraction of indole and products in HDN reaction (a) Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt; (b) Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt@mSiO2.
Figure 7. Molar fraction of indole and products in HDN reaction (a) Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt; (b) Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt@mSiO2.
Materials 12 03878 g007
Materials 12 03878 g008 550
Figure 8. Reutilization study of the catalysts at 5 h of reaction time.
Figure 8. Reutilization study of the catalysts at 5 h of reaction time.
Materials 12 03878 g008
Table
Table 1. HR-TEM characterization, inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES), SBET, and Pt 4f7/2 binding energy.
Table 1. HR-TEM characterization, inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES), SBET, and Pt 4f7/2 binding energy.
CatalystsCore Mean Diameter (nm)Thickness SiO2 Mean Diameter (nm)Pt Mean Diameter (nm)Pt Content (%)SBET (m2 g−1)Pt 4f7/2 (eV)
Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt229 ± 7545 ± 123.6 ± 1.00.7 (1.0) (2)1170.9
Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt@mSiO2231 ± 4296 ± 15 (51 ± 14) (1)3.4 ± 0.80.35 (1.0) (2)178--
(1) Second shell thickness SiO2 mean diameter in brackets; (2) nominal value in brackets.
Table
Table 2. Indole conversion and % HDN of the catalysts at reaction time of 8 h.
Table 2. Indole conversion and % HDN of the catalysts at reaction time of 8 h.
CatalystsIndole Conversion% HDN 1
Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt5530
Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt@mSiO29888
NiMo/Al2O3 [11]5030
1% HDN= 100 × (ECH + EB)/(ECH+EB+OEA+HIN).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dinamarca, R.; Valles, V.; Ledesma, B.; Campos, C.H.; Pecchi, G.; Beltramone, A. Magnetic Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt and Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt@SiO2 Structures for HDN of Indole. Materials 2019, 12, 3878. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12233878

AMA Style

Dinamarca R, Valles V, Ledesma B, Campos CH, Pecchi G, Beltramone A. Magnetic Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt and Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt@SiO2 Structures for HDN of Indole. Materials. 2019; 12(23):3878. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12233878

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dinamarca, Robinson, Verónica Valles, Brenda Ledesma, Cristian H. Campos, Gina Pecchi, and Andrea Beltramone. 2019. "Magnetic Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt and Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt@SiO2 Structures for HDN of Indole" Materials 12, no. 23: 3878. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12233878

APA Style

Dinamarca, R., Valles, V., Ledesma, B., Campos, C. H., Pecchi, G., & Beltramone, A. (2019). Magnetic Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt and Fe3O4@SiO2–Pt@SiO2 Structures for HDN of Indole. Materials, 12(23), 3878. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12233878

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop