Next Article in Journal
Comparison of Hot Deformation Behavior Characteristics Between As-Cast and Extruded Al-Zn-Mg-Cu (7075) Aluminum Alloys with a Similar Grain Size
Next Article in Special Issue
Monitoring the Corrosion of Steel in Concrete Exposed to a Marine Environment
Previous Article in Journal
Chitosan Biopolymer from Crab Shell as Recyclable Film to Remove/Recover in Batch Ketoprofen from Water: Understanding the Factors Affecting the Adsorption Process
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Influence of Surface Wettability and Topography on the Bioactivity of TiO2/Epoxy Coatings on AISI 316L Stainless Steel
Article

Activation and Repassivation of Stainless Steels in Artificial Brines as a Function of pH

1
Slovenian National Building and Civil Engineering Institute, Dimičeva ulica 12, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
2
OMV Austria Exploration & Production GmbH, Protteser Strasse 40, 2230 Gaenserndorf, Austria
3
Department of General, Analytical and Physical Chemistry, Montanuniversitaet Leoben, Franz Josef-Strasse 18, 8700 Leoben, Austria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2019, 12(23), 3811; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12233811
Received: 22 October 2019 / Revised: 14 November 2019 / Accepted: 16 November 2019 / Published: 20 November 2019
When planning oil wells with stainless steel components, two possible reasons for depassivation have to be considered—chemical depassivation caused by acidizing jobs and mechanical depassivation caused by various tools and hard particles. The study explores conditions causing chemical activation of investigated steels and circumstances under which repassivation occurs after activation. The main focus of the study is to determine, how quickly various steels can repassivate under different conditions and to find pH values where repassivation will occur after depassivation. The investigated steels were ferritic (martensitic or bainitic) in the cases of 13Cr, 13Cr6Ni2Mo, and 17Cr4Ni2Mo, austenitic in the case of 17Cr12Ni2Mo, and duplex (austenitic and ferritic) in the case of 22Cr5Ni3Mo. Potentiodynamic experiments were employed to obtain electrochemical properties of investigated steels, followed by immersion tests to find ultimate conditions, where the steels still retain their passivity. After obtaining this information, scratch tests were performed to study the repassivation kinetics. It was found that repassivation times are similar for nearly all investigated steels independent of their chemical composition and microstructure. View Full-Text
Keywords: stainless steels; activation; repassivation stainless steels; activation; repassivation
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Mujanović, E.; Zajec, B.; Kosec, T.; Legat, A.; Hönig, S.; Zehethofer, G.; Mori, G. Activation and Repassivation of Stainless Steels in Artificial Brines as a Function of pH. Materials 2019, 12, 3811. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12233811

AMA Style

Mujanović E, Zajec B, Kosec T, Legat A, Hönig S, Zehethofer G, Mori G. Activation and Repassivation of Stainless Steels in Artificial Brines as a Function of pH. Materials. 2019; 12(23):3811. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12233811

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mujanović, Emir, Bojan Zajec, Tadeja Kosec, Andraž Legat, Stefan Hönig, Gerald Zehethofer, and Gregor Mori. 2019. "Activation and Repassivation of Stainless Steels in Artificial Brines as a Function of pH" Materials 12, no. 23: 3811. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12233811

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop