Next Article in Journal
Correction: Li, P., et al. Research on Erosion-Corrosion Rate of 304 Stainless Steel in Acidic Slurry via Experimental Design Method. Materials 2019, 12, 2330
Next Article in Special Issue
Possibilities of Manufacturing Products from Cermet Compositions Using Nanoscale Powders by Additive Manufacturing Methods
Previous Article in Journal
Forming Features and Properties of Titanium Alloy Billets After Radial-Shear Rolling
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hydrometallurgical Process for Tantalum Recovery from Epoxy-Coated Solid Electrolyte Tantalum Capacitors
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:

Aluminum-Alumina Composites: Part I: Obtaining and Characterization of Powders

KINETICA Engineering Center, National University of Science and Technology MISIS, 119991 Moscow, Russia
Laboratory of Energy Storage Substances, Joint Institute for High Temperatures of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 125412 Moscow, Russia
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2019, 12(19), 3180;
Original submission received: 29 August 2019 / Revised: 25 September 2019 / Accepted: 26 September 2019 / Published: 27 September 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Metallurgy of Non-ferrous, Rare and Precious Metals)


The process of advanced aluminum-alumina powders production for selective laser melting was studied. The economically effective method of obtaining aluminum-alumina powdery composites for further selective laser melting was comprehensively studied. The aluminum powders with 10–20 wt. % alumina content were obtained by oxidation of aluminum in water. Aluminum oxidation was carried out at ≤200 °C. The oxidized powders were further dried at 120 °C and calcined at 600 °C. Four oxidation modes with different process temperatures (120–200 °C) and pressures (0.15–1.80 MPa) were investigated. Parameters of aluminum powders oxidation to obtain composites with 10.0, 14.5, 17.4, and 20.0 wt. % alumina have been determined. The alumina content, particle morphology, and particle size distribution for the obtained aluminum-alumina powdery composites were studied by XRD, SEM, laser diffraction, and volumetric methods. According to the obtained characteristics of aluminum-alumina powdery composites, they are suitable for the SLM process.

1. Introduction

Selective laser melting (SLM) for 3D metal object production is a rapidly developing field of science and technology. 3D printing of aluminum alloys and aluminum matrix composites (AMC) is pretending to become the leading technology for the production of complex shape details for aerospace and automotive engineering [1,2,3,4,5,6,7].
The SLM process parameters (laser power, scanning speed, powder feeding rate, etc.) have a decisive influence on the 3D object characteristics [8,9,10,11]. The quality of the initial powder is quite significant as well [12,13]. The properties of aluminum-based alloys are well suited to produce complex shape objects of high strength and density by SLM processes [14].
There are many problems in structure formation (for example, porosity) of 3D sintered objects formed by using the powders with a broad particle size distribution. The powders with spherical particles having a narrow size distribution is the best initial material to obtain 3D objects with high quality by SLM. This provides a compact packaging of particles in a melted layer and a stable feeding rate of the powder. For example, aluminum powders with a particle size from 30 to 100 μm are typically used for 3D printing by the SLM process [15,16].
Disadvantages of aluminum powders for additive technologies are their poor flowability, low emissivity factor, high conductivity, and low mechanical properties of synthesized 3D objects [17,18]. On the opposite side, aluminum powders reinforced with refractory additives allow to obtain sintered objects with excellent properties, such as good wear resistance, high hardness, and tensile strength [19]. In such powders, aluminum is the matrix phase and it forms a percolating network during sintering, and the refractory additive is the reinforcement and crystallization center [20]. SiC, TiC, TiB2, or Al2O3 can be used as a refractory additive [21]. However, the use of Al2O3 eliminates the possibility of formation of side phases during sintering and interaction of the reinforcement with the aluminum matrix. aluminum-alumina composites are considered as raw materials for the synthesis of potential lightweight and high-strength alloys for aircraft and automotive industry [19].
Aluminum particles covered with an alumina shell (Al core and Al2O3 shell) is an interesting raw material for 3D printing. The Al core and Al2O3 shell structure of the particles has higher stability, emissivity, thermal resistance, and aging properties in comparison with non-oxidized aluminum particle [22]. The flowability of such powder is also much higher due to lower surface energy and, as a result, lesser cohesion forces. Despite some advantages, high aluminum oxide content in the obtained object could decrease its strength properties. That is why alumina content in composites should be strictly controlled.
There are different ways of obtaining aluminum-alumina powder composites from aluminum powder. The most obvious is the oxidation of aluminum by air or oxygen [23,24,25]. However, the oxidation of small particles causes the formation of hollow alumina spheres [23]. As the initial material for the SLM process, hollow alumina has unacceptable characteristics (see Figure 1). Oxidation of aluminum powder in water is one of the possible solutions [26,27]. The aluminum particle oxidation process can be stopped at any oxidation degree by reagent separation (water and aluminum) at a certain time. The oxidized powder can be deleted from the water by filtering or sedimentation. This method is perfectly suitable for producing Al core and Al2O3 shell powdery composites.
The oxidation of nano- and micron-sized aluminum powders by water is widely studied [22,23,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33]. The majority of publications [22,28,29,30,31,34] dealt with the different points of obtaining hydrogen by the reaction of aluminum with water. The primary purpose of such works is an increase in the Al + H2O reaction rate because aluminum is passivated by oxide layer [26,31,34]. Many works on the aluminum powder oxidation by water and steam are devoted to the theoretical aspects of the aluminum oxidation and hydrogen obtaining [28,34]. Some studies have shown that high oxidation temperatures lead to the following problems: Poorly ordered crystal structure of oxidation products, agglomeration of particles, low specific surface area and micropores in oxidation products [31]. The effect of mechanochemical activation on the reaction kinetics in Al–H2O system was studied, and the effect of alkali metals was investigated [22,28,29,30]. The oxidation of the micron-sized aluminum powder by water for the synthesis of pore-free aluminum-alumina composites was also proposed [35]. This oxidation leads to the formation of aluminum particles with an oxide surface layer (Al core and Al2O3 shell) [28,31,36].
The aim of this work is to study the process of oxidation of aluminum with water for the manufacture of Al core and Al2O3 shell powder composites and the obtained powder’s comprehensive characterization.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Aluminum Powder

Micron-sized aluminum powder (purchased from RUSAL Co., Russia) was used as the initial material to obtain aluminum-alumina composite. Aluminum powder was produced by molten aluminum spraying. The elemental composition of aluminum powder was studied by using the ThermoScientific X–2 mass spectrometer with inductively coupled plasma gun (ICP–MS method). The powder size distribution curves were obtained with the Fritsch Analysette 22 particle size analyzer.

2.2. Aluminum-Alumina Powder Composites

The method of obtaining the aluminum-alumina composite powder consisted of two stages:
  • Oxidation of aluminum powder by water at pressure 0.15–1.80 MPa;
  • Powder drying at 120 °C and calcination of the aluminum-alumina composite in a furnace at 600 °C.

2.2.1. Oxidation of Aluminum Powder by Water (Stage 1)

The first stage of obtaining the aluminum-alumina powder composites was the oxidation of aluminum powder by water. The oxidation process was executed in the high-pressure reactor which was described in [37]. Three kilograms of suspension of aluminum powder and distilled water (mass ratio of H2O/Al = 2) was added into the reactor. The reactor had a volume of five liters, and it was made of stainless steel with Teflon thermal isolation inside. An anchor-type agitator with 100 rotations per minute stirred the suspension continuously.
The temperature and the pressure inside the reactor were controlled by thermocouple type K (Ni–CrNi) and pressure sensor. When the pressure and temperature values were above a certain limit, additional cool water was added to the reactor to reduce its temperature. High heating is associated with the exothermic reaction of aluminum oxidation, which emits from 418 to 438 kJ/(mol Al) of heat (Equations (1) and (2))
Al + 3 H2O → Al(OH)3 + 1.5 H2 − 438 kJ
Al + 2 H2O → AlOOH + 1.5 H2 − 418 kJ
The H2O/Al suspension was poured into the reactor, and the suspension was continuously mixed. The suspension was heated at 3 K/min rate to a certain temperature (see Table 1). The mixture of hydrogen and steam was transferred to the heat exchanger where the water was condensed and returned to the reactor. Hydrogen was a byproduct, and it was released into the atmosphere. Solid products of the reaction (Al + Al(OH)3 + AlOOH) were removed from the bottom of the reactor. The resulting solid reaction products (Al + Al(OH)3 + AlOOH) were separated from the residual water by the filtration process.

2.2.2. Drying and Calcination (Stage 2)

The thermal treatment consisted of drying and calcination.
The wet powder from Stage 1 (Al + Al(OH)3 + AlOOH) was loaded into stainless steel containers. The container was placed in the Binder VD drying box. The drying process was executed for 1 h at 120 ° C.
Then, the dried powder was subjected to the calcination. This stage was necessary for the conversion of all crystalline modifications of oxidation products (Al(OH)3, AlOOH, etc.) to γ–Al2O3. The calcination process was carried out for five hours at 600 °C (LHT 08/16 Nabertherm laboratory furnace).

2.2.3. Characterization

Products of chemical interaction of powdery aluminum with water (reactions (1) and (2)) were identified in [28]. Reactions (1) and (2) were proceeded in parallel depending on the process temperature. According to [22], oxidation products after Stage 1 were presented by Al(OH)3, AlOOH, and θ-Al2O3. The possibility of γ–Al2O3 formation from reactions 1 and 2 was not reported. Further thermal treatment was needed to convert aluminum hydroxides into the aluminum oxides (3).
AlOOH/Al(OH)3 → Al2O3 + H2O, T = 600 °C
The alumina content in the resulting aluminum-alumina powdery composites was determined by the amount of hydrogen, which was released during the oxidation of aluminum powder by water. However, aluminum-alumina composites were further oxidized during the calcination process. Therefore, the aluminum content in the finally obtained composites was determined by the volumetric method [25].
The morphological properties of the finally obtained aluminum-alumina composites were studied on the JEOL JSM–7407F microscope. The phase composition of the composites was studied by the EQUINOX 1000 X-ray diffractometer.

3. Results

3.1. Aluminum Powder Characterization

The elemental composition of the initial aluminum powder is presented in Table 2. The most significant impurities were Ga (0.09 wt. %), Zn and Ce (both 0.08 wt. %), Fe, and La (both 0.07 wt. %). According to the size distribution curves (see Figure 2), the particles of the initial Al powder had a diameter from 1 to 120 µm.
SEM images of the initial aluminum powder are shown in Figure 3. The particles were spherical or spheroidal. Several agglomerates consisting of smaller spherical particles were observed.
Thus, the low impurities content together with the relatively narrow particle size distribution and spherical particles’ shape makes this initial aluminum powder suitable as a raw material for further oxidation and core–shell composites preparation.

3.2. Oxidation of Aluminum Powder

Four oxidation modes were studied to obtain aluminum-alumina powdery composites with the alumina content from 10.0 wt. % for mode A (see Figure 4a) to 20.0 wt. % for mode D (see Figure 4d and Table 1). The higher amount of released hydrogen for mode D compared to mode A corresponded to a higher alumina content in the powder. The higher alumina content correlated with the higher oxidation temperature and longer reaction time (see Figure 4). According to Figure 4, oxidation of aluminum by water was initiated at a temperature of about 68 °C. This can be explained by the partial permeability of the surface oxide layer at this temperature.
The curves of hydrogen yield (Figure 4) had approximately the same slope for all studied oxidation modes. The oxidation rate was increased linearly as the oxidation temperature increased. The reason for that was the active self-sustaining exothermic reaction of aluminum with water, which has been reported in numerous publications [22,30,31,34]. For the studied modes, the suppression of the reaction rate due to the protective layer formation on aluminum particles was not found.
The alumina content in composites directly depended on the oxidation duration: For mode A the oxidation duration was 30 min and the alumina content was 10 wt.%. For mode D, the oxidation duration was 140 min and the alumina content was 20 wt.%.

3.3. Effect of the Oxidation Mode on the Particles’ Properties

SEM images of the obtained aluminum-alumina powdery composites (before drying and calcination) are shown in Figure 5.
Comparison of the images in Figure 3 and Figure 5 shows that aluminum particles did not change their spherical shape after oxidation in water. The relatively smooth surface of aluminum particles was covered with a gibbsite-boehmite layer of oxidation products (see Figure 5a, right image). The hydroxide layer on the particles had an irregular structure formed by plate crystals (Figure 5a). Agglomerates of particles were also observed. The size of these agglomerates was larger than 100 µm (see Figure 5b, left image) and they were larger than the average diameter of Al particles (see Figure 3, left image).
After deep oxidation (mode D), the aluminum particles did not change their shape (see Figure 5b). A small part of the hydroxide layer was separated from the surface, and individual particles were present in the sample (see Figure 5b, right image). The hydroxide layer on the particles oxidized in mode D consists of larger crystals, and it looks denser.
SEM images of aluminum-alumina powdery composites after heat treatment are shown in Figure 6. The particles were predominantly spherical. Nevertheless, there were some agglomerates, which are explained by the sintering of particles during the calcination process. After the deep oxidation (mode D) there were no agglomerates (see Figure 6b). A thicker oxide surface layer was preventing the sintering of particles. The presence of agglomerates had a little effect on the particle size distribution.
XRD patterns for the aluminum-alumina powdery composites (after heating and calcination) for the different alumina contents are shown in Figure 7. Analysis of XRD patterns shows that in addition to aluminum, the presence of γ–Al2O3 was found. The relative intensity of the peaks corresponding to γ–Al2O3 correlates with the alumina content of the aluminum-alumina powdery composites. Absence of any other crystalline phase in the aluminum-alumina powdery composites was observed. Particle size distribution curves for aluminum-alumina powdery composites with alumina content of 10.0 wt. % and 20.0 wt. % are shown in Figure 8. Both powders (see Figure 8) have a rather narrow particle size distribution. More than 90% of the particles have a size from 20 to 80 µm. In general, the size distribution curves of aluminum-alumina powdery composites were the same as for the initial aluminum powders (see Figure 2).
The average particle size of aluminum-alumina composites was 41–42 µm. This value was also average for the initial aluminum powder (see Figure 2). The calculated value mean oxide film thickness for average particle varied from 1.5 µm (mode A) to 3 µm (mode D) (Figure 5). A small change in the particle size distribution curves was, probably, due to the swelling of the particles because of the lower density of the oxide layer compared to aluminum. This could be explained by the absence of pores in the obtained powders. This is a significant advantage in comparison with partially oxidized powers in gaseous (oxygen, carbon dioxide) mediums which usually have a large pore volume [24,38].

4. Conclusions

The method of obtaining aluminum-alumina powdery composites for their subsequent sintering by selective laser melting has been studied. Initial micron-sized aluminum powders were oxidized in water at 120–200 °C and 0.15–1.8 MPa pressure. Oxidation products were dried at 120 °C and calcined at 600 °C. Four high-pressure high-temperature oxidation modes were considered. The alumina content, particle morphology, and particle size distribution for the obtained aluminum-alumina powdery compositions were studied by XRD, SEM, laser diffraction, and volumetric methods.
The temperature of the oxidation process affected the alumina content in the composites. The alumina content was 10.0 wt. % for 120 °C and it was increased to 20.0 wt. % at 200 °C. The beginning of the oxidation reaction of aluminum for all modes was observed at 68 °C.
The particles of the initial aluminum powder had a spherical shape and did not change significantly after processing. The average particle size and size distribution did not differ significantly from the initial aluminum powder indicating low porosity of the formed oxide layer. According to the obtained characteristics of aluminum-alumina powdery composites, they are suitable for further sintering. However, for the removal of agglomerates and additional sieving with 100 µm mesh size is necessary.
Synthesis of 3D objects from aluminum-alumina powdery composites by the SLM process will be considered in the future.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.G. and A.N.; data curation, G.A. and O.B.; formal analysis, A.A.; investigation, M.V., A.Z. and E.S.; methodology, S.K.; resources, A.A.; supervision, A.G.; visualization, K.S. and A.O.; writing—original draft, K.S.; writing—review & editing, A.N.


The work is financially supported by Russian Science Foundation (RSF), grant № 19-79-30025.


The authors thank the MISIS Academic Writing University Center for its assistance in the preparation of this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. Eyers, D.R.; Potter, A.T. Industrial Additive Manufacturing: A manufacturing systems perspective. Comput. Ind. 2017, 92, 208–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rauch, E.; Unterhofer, M.; Dallasega, P. Industry sector analysis for the application of additive manufacturing in smart and distributed manufacturing systems. Manuf. Lett. 2017, 120, 305–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kok, Y.; Tan, X.P.; Wang, P.; Nai, M.L.S.; Loh, N.H.; Liu, E.; Tor, S.B. Anisotropy and heterogeneity of microstructure and mechanical properties in metal additive manufacturing: A critical review. Mater. Des. 2018, 139, 565–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Herzog, D.; Seyda, V.; Wycisk, E.; Emmelmann, C. Additive manufacturing of metals. Acta Mater. 2016, 117, 371–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Szemkus, S.; Kempf, B.; Jahn, S.; Wiehl, G.; Heringhaus, F.; Rettenmayr, M. Laser additive manufacturing of contact materials. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2018, 252, 612–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Riberio, F. 3D printing with metals. Comput. Control Eng. J. 1998, 9, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xu, W.; Brandt, M.; Sun, S.; Elambasseril, J.; Liu, Q.; Latham, K.; Xia, K.; Qian, M. Additive manufacturing of strong and ductile Ti-6Al-4V by selective laser melting via in situ martensite decomposition. Acta Mater. 2015, 85, 74–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Martin, J.H.; Yahata, B.D.; Hundley, J.M.; Mayer, J.A.; Schaedler, T.A.; Pollock, T.M. 3D printing of high-strength aluminum alloys. Nature 2017, 549, 365–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Kaufmann, N.; Imran, M.; Wischeropp, T.M.; Emmelmann, C.; Siddique, S.; Walther, F. Influence of Process Parameters on the Quality of Aluminum Alloy EN AW 7075 Using Selective Laser Melting (SLM). Phys. Procedia 2016, 83, 918–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ding, Y.; Muñiz-Lerma, J.A.; Trask, M.; Chou, S.; Walker, A.; Brochu, M. Microstructure and mechanical property considerations in additive manufacturing of aluminum alloys. MRS Bull. 2016, 41, 745–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gu, H.; Gong, H.; Dilip, J.J.S.; Pal, D.; Hicks, A.; Doak, H.; Stucker, B. Effects of Powder Variation on the Microstructure and Tensile Strength of Ti-6Al-4V Parts Fabricated by Selective Laser Melting. Int. J. Powder Metall. 2015, 51, 470–483. [Google Scholar]
  12. Yin, S.; Yan, X.; Chen, C.; Jenkins, R.; Liu, M.; Lupoi, R. Hybrid additive manufacturing of Al-Ti6Al4V functionally graded materials with selective laser melting and cold spraying. Mater. Process. Technol. 2018, 255, 650–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, B.; Wildman, R.; Tuck, C.; Ashcroft, I.; Hague, R. Investigaztion the effect of particle size distribution on processing parameters optimisation in selective laser melting process. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium—An Additive Manufacturing Conference, Austin, TX, USA, 8–10 August 2011; pp. 227–238. [Google Scholar]
  14. Zhang, H.; Zhu, H.; Qi, T.; Hu, Z.; Zeng, X. Selective laser melting of high strength Al–Cu–Mg alloys: Processing, microstructure and mechanical properties. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2016, 656, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pozdniakov, A.V.; Churyumov, A.Y.; Loginova, I.S.; Daubarayte, D.K.; Ryabov, D.K.; Korolev, V.A. Microstructure and properties of novel AlSi11CuMn alloy manufactured by selective laser melting. Mater. Lett. 2018, 225, 33–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Manca, D.R.; Churyumov, A.Y.; Pozdniakov, A.V.; Ryabov, D.K.; Korolev, V.A.; Daubarayte, D.K. Novel heat-resistant Al-Si-Ni-Fe alloy manufactured by selective laser melting. Mater. Lett. 2019, 236, 676–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sercombe, T.B.; Li, X. Selective laser melting of aluminium and aluminium metal matrix composites: Review. Mater. Technol. 2016, 31, 77–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yu, W.H.; Sling, S.L.; Chua, C.K.; Kuo, C.N.; Tian, X.L. Particle-reinforced metal matrix nanocomposites fabricated by selective laser melting: A state of the art review. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2019, 104, 330–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Durai, T.G.; Das, K.; Das, S. Synthesis and characterization of Al matrix composites reinforced by in situ alumina particulates. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2007, 445–446, 100–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Surappa, M.K. Aluminium matrix composites: Challenges and opportunities. Sadhana 2003, 28, 319–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pramod, S.L.; Bakshi, S.R.; Murty, B.S. Aluminum-Based Cast In Situ Composites: A Review. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2015, 24, 2185–2207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tikhov, S.F.; Fenelonov, V.B.; Sadykov, V.A.; Potapova, Y.V.; Salanov, A.N. Porous Al2O3/Al Metal Ceramics Prepared by the Oxidation of Aluminum Powder under Hydrothermal Conditions Followed by Thermal Dehydration: I. Composition and Macrocharacteristics of Composites. Kinet. Catal. 2000, 41, 826–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rai, A.; Park, K.; Zhou, L.; Zachariah, M.R. Understanding the mechanism of aluminum nanoparticle oxidation. Combust. Theory Modell. 2006, 10, 843–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Vorozhtsov, A.B.; Lerner, M.; Rodkevich, N.; Nie, H.; Abraham, A.; Schoenitz, M.; Dreizin, E.L. Oxidation of nano-sized aluminum powders. Thermochimica Acta 2016, 636, 48–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  25. Antipina, S.A.; Zmanovskii, S.V.; Gromov, A.A.; Teipel, U. Air and water oxidation of aluminum flake particles. Powder Technol. 2017, 307, 184–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Streletskii, A.N.; Kolbanev, I.V.; Borunova, A.B.; Butyagin, P.Y. Mechanochemical Activation of Aluminum: 3. Kinetics of Interaction between Aluminum and Water. Colloid J. 2005, 67, 631–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Vlaskin, M.S.; Shkolnikov, E.I.; Lisicyn, A.V.; Bersh, A.V.; Zhuk, A.Z. Computational and experimental investigation on thermodynamics of the reactor of aluminum oxidation in saturated wet steam. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2010, 35, 1888–1894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, H.Z.; Leung, D.Y.C.; Leung, M.K.H.; Ni, M. A review on hydrogen production using aluminum and aluminum alloys. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2009, 13, 845–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kravchenko, O.V.; Semenenko, K.N.; Bulychev, B.M.; Kalmykov, K.B. Activation of aluminum metal and its reaction with water. J. Alloy. Compd. 2005, 397, 58–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shmelev, V.; Nikolaev, V.; Lee, J.H.; Yim, C. Hydrogen production by reaction of aluminum with water. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2016, 41, 16664–16673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Shkolnikov, E.I.; Shaitura, N.S.; Vlaskin, M.S. Structural properties of boehmite produced by hydrothermal oxidation of aluminum. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2013, 73, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lysenko, A.P.; Nalivayko, A.Y. Optimization of electrolysis during the high-pure aluminium oxide obtaining, using electrochemical method of aluminium oxidation. Tsvetnye Met. 2017, 1, 28–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Nalivaiko, A.Y.; Lysenko, A.P.; Pak, V.I.; Ivanov, M.A. Feasibility Assessment for Leucosapphire Production from Aluminum Oxide Prepared Electrochemically. Refract. Ind. Ceram. 2018, 55, 80–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ilyukhina, A.V.; Kravchenko, O.V.; Bulychev, B.M. Studies on microstructure of activated aluminum and its hydrogen generation properties in aluminum/water reaction. J. Alloy. Compd. 2017, 690, 321–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ambaryan, G.; Valyano, G.; Zhuk, A.; Shkolnikov, E.; Gromov, A.; Zmanovsky, S.; Vlaskin, M. Partial oxidation of aluminum powder for obtaining a controlled amount of aluminum oxide on the surface of aluminum. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Env. Sci. 2018, 168, 012021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  36. Lisitsyn, A.V.; Dombrovsky, L.A.; Mendeleyev, V.Y.; Grigorenko, A.V.; Vlaskin, M.S.; Zhuk, A.Z. Near-infrared optical properties of a porous alumina ceramics produced by hydrothermal oxidation of aluminum. Infrared Phys. Technol. 2016, 77, 162–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Grigorenko, A.V.; Ambaryan, G.N.; Valyano, G.E.; Vlaskin, M.S.; Gromov, A.A.; Zmanovsky, S.V. Kinetics of Aluminum Micron Powder Oxidation in Hot Distilled Water and Product Microstructure Investigation. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 381, 012028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Nie, H.; Schoenitz, M.; Dreizin, E.L. Oxidation of differently prepared Al-Mg alloy powders in oxygen. J. Alloy. Compd. 2016, 685, 402–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
Figure 1. Scheme of the slow oxidation of aluminum particle by air and water.
Figure 1. Scheme of the slow oxidation of aluminum particle by air and water.
Materials 12 03180 g001
Figure 2. Size distribution curve for the initial aluminum powder.
Figure 2. Size distribution curve for the initial aluminum powder.
Materials 12 03180 g002
Figure 3. SEM images of the initial aluminum powder.
Figure 3. SEM images of the initial aluminum powder.
Materials 12 03180 g003
Figure 4. Yield of the released hydrogen and reaction temperature vs. reaction time for the following oxidation modes: (a) A, (b) B, (c) C, (d) D.
Figure 4. Yield of the released hydrogen and reaction temperature vs. reaction time for the following oxidation modes: (a) A, (b) B, (c) C, (d) D.
Materials 12 03180 g004
Figure 5. SEM images of the oxidized aluminum powders at different modes (before drying and calcination): (a) A, (b) D.
Figure 5. SEM images of the oxidized aluminum powders at different modes (before drying and calcination): (a) A, (b) D.
Materials 12 03180 g005
Figure 6. SEM images of the oxidized aluminum powders at different modes (after drying and calcination processes): (a) A, (b) D.
Figure 6. SEM images of the oxidized aluminum powders at different modes (after drying and calcination processes): (a) A, (b) D.
Materials 12 03180 g006
Figure 7. XRD patterns of aluminum-alumina powdery composites: 1) 20.0 wt. % Al2O3, 2) 14.5 wt. % Al2O3, 3) 10.0 wt. % Al2O3.
Figure 7. XRD patterns of aluminum-alumina powdery composites: 1) 20.0 wt. % Al2O3, 2) 14.5 wt. % Al2O3, 3) 10.0 wt. % Al2O3.
Materials 12 03180 g007
Figure 8. Particle size distribution of aluminum-alumina powder composites with the alumina content a) 10.0 wt. % and b) 20.0 wt. %.
Figure 8. Particle size distribution of aluminum-alumina powder composites with the alumina content a) 10.0 wt. % and b) 20.0 wt. %.
Materials 12 03180 g008
Table 1. Parameters of obtaining aluminum-alumina powdery composites.
Table 1. Parameters of obtaining aluminum-alumina powdery composites.
ModeParameters of Stage 1
Maximal Temperature, °CPressure, MPaVolume of the Released H2, LitersAlumina Content, wt. %Mean Alumina Layer Thickness *, µm
*: Calculated for mean particle diameter particle.
Table 2. Parameters of obtaining aluminum-alumina powdery composites.
Table 2. Parameters of obtaining aluminum-alumina powdery composites.
Element, wt. %
Cr, Ti, Co, Y, Cu, and volatiles0.35

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gromov, A.A.; Nalivaiko, A.Y.; Ambaryan, G.N.; Vlaskin, M.S.; Buryakovskaya, O.A.; Kislenko, S.A.; Zhuk, A.Z.; Shkolnikov, E.I.; Slyusarskiy, K.V.; Osipenkova, A.A.; et al. Aluminum-Alumina Composites: Part I: Obtaining and Characterization of Powders. Materials 2019, 12, 3180.

AMA Style

Gromov AA, Nalivaiko AY, Ambaryan GN, Vlaskin MS, Buryakovskaya OA, Kislenko SA, Zhuk AZ, Shkolnikov EI, Slyusarskiy KV, Osipenkova AA, et al. Aluminum-Alumina Composites: Part I: Obtaining and Characterization of Powders. Materials. 2019; 12(19):3180.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gromov, Alexander A., Anton Yu. Nalivaiko, Grayr N. Ambaryan, Mikhail S. Vlaskin, Olesya A. Buryakovskaya, Sergey A. Kislenko, Andrey Z. Zhuk, Evgeniy I. Shkolnikov, Konstantin V. Slyusarskiy, Alexandra A. Osipenkova, and et al. 2019. "Aluminum-Alumina Composites: Part I: Obtaining and Characterization of Powders" Materials 12, no. 19: 3180.

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop