Next Article in Journal
Lime Treatment of Coal Bottom Ash for Use in Road Pavements: Application to El Jadida Zone in Morocco
Next Article in Special Issue
Wire Ropes and CFRP Strips to Provide Masonry Walls with Out-Of-Plane Strengthening
Previous Article in Journal
The Utilization of Cell-Penetrating Peptides in the Intracellular Delivery of Viral Nanoparticles
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Simulation Study to Calculate a Structure Conceived by Eugène Viollet-le-Duc in 1850 with Finite Element Analysis
Open AccessFeature PaperArticle

Effectiveness of Nanolime as a Stone Consolidant: A 4-Year Study of Six Common UK Limestones

1
BRE Centre for Innovative Construction Materials, Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK
2
Department of Architecture and Built Environment, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UK
3
Building Conservation & Geospatial Survey, Technical Conservation Department, Historic England, The Engine House, Fire Fly Avenue, Swindon SN2 2EH, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2019, 12(17), 2673; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12172673
Received: 23 July 2019 / Revised: 12 August 2019 / Accepted: 14 August 2019 / Published: 22 August 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Reinforcement and Repair Materials for Masonry Structures)
Protecting stone buildings from weathering and decay is a major challenge in the conservation of built heritage. Most of the stone consolidants currently available are well suited to silicate stones, but are less compatible with limestone. In this paper we present for the first time the results over a 4-year period of various consolidation treatments carried out using nanolime on 6 of the most representative and significant stones used in historic buildings in the United Kingdom. Tests investigated the influence of stone type, environmental conditions and pre-treatments on the effectiveness of the consolidation treatment. A comprehensive and rigorous testing programme was carried out to evaluate the short (12 weeks) and longer-term (4 years) effects. Stone samples were characterised before and after treatment using light and electron microscopy, sorptivity tests and a novel methodology employing drilling resistance to interrogate the near surface effects. Results show that for some of the stones, such as Clunch and Bath Stone, the positive effect of the treatment with nanolime is noticeable after 4 years since application. However, results for other stones such as Portland and magnesian limestone showed that the initial beneficial effect of the treatment is reduced after 4 years. Nanolime treatment of Ham Stone produced an unnoticeable effect on the continuous natural reduction of the drilling resistance of the specimen over time. The results presented are of immense value to conservators as they provide essential guidance on the most appropriate repair approach. Impact to the conservation industry will be to avoid the use of nanolime on stones where there is no perceivable benefit, reducing the risk of adverse effects, including potential damage to buildings. In additional costs will be saved which might otherwise have been spent on ineffective treatments. View Full-Text
Keywords: nanolime; limestone; drilling resistance; consolidation nanolime; limestone; drilling resistance; consolidation
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Tzavellos, S.; Pesce, G.L.; Wu, Y.; Henry, A.; Robson, S.; Ball, R.J. Effectiveness of Nanolime as a Stone Consolidant: A 4-Year Study of Six Common UK Limestones. Materials 2019, 12, 2673.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map

1
Back to TopTop