Next Article in Journal
Research of Method for Solving Relaxation Modulus Based on Three-Point Bending Creep Test
Previous Article in Journal
The Effect of New Thiophene-Derived Diphenyl Aminophosphonates on Growth of Terrestrial Plants
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 12
Issue 12
10.3390/ma12122020
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Efficient Adsorption of Lead (II) from Aqueous Phase Solutions Using Polypyrrole-Based Activated Carbon

by
Abdulaziz Ali Alghamdi
,
Abdel-Basit Al-Odayni
*,
Waseem Sharaf Saeed
*,
Abdullah Al-Kahtani
,
Fahad A. Alharthi
and
Taieb Aouak
Chemistry Department, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2019, 12(12), 2020; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12122020
Submission received: 20 May 2019 / Revised: 14 June 2019 / Accepted: 19 June 2019 / Published: 24 June 2019
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this study, polypyrrole-based activated carbon was prepared by the carbonization of polypyrrole at 650 °C for 2 h in the presence of four-times the mass of KOH as a chemical activator. The structural and morphological properties of the product (polypyrrole-based activated carbon (PPyAC4)), analyzed by scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, and thermogravimetric analysis, support its applicability as an adsorbent. The adsorption characteristics of PPyAC4 were examined through the adsorption of lead ions from aqueous solutions. The influence of various factors, including initial ion concentration, pH, contact time, and adsorbent dose, on the adsorption of Pb2+ was investigated to identify the optimum adsorption conditions. The experimental data fit well to the pseudo-second-order kinetic model (R2 = 0.9997) and the Freundlich isotherm equation (R2 = 0.9950), suggesting a chemisorption pathway. The adsorption capacity was found to increase with increases in time and initial concentration, while it decreased with an increase in adsorbent dose. Additionally, the highest adsorption was attained at pH 5.5. The calculated maximum capacity, qm, determined from the Langmuir model was 50 mg/g.

1. Introduction

Currently, water pollution is a global issue, with heavy metal pollution representing one of the most serious problems. Therefore, the removal of heavy metals is of special concern to scientists and engineers because of their harmful effects on many life forms [1,2]. Heavy metals, including lead, copper, mercury, chromium, and nickel, commonly enter aquatic systems through effluent discharge from various manufacturing processes, resulting in damages to ecosystems and human health [3,4]. They are non-biodegradable and tend to accumulate in living tissues, particularly in human bodies, causing various diseases and significant physiological disorders such as central nervous system damage [2,5]. Among all heavy metal pollutants, lead is the most common and one of the most toxic, reaching water sources from various industrial activities such as mining, oil refining, metal plating and finishing, and battery manufacturing [4,6]. The maximum contaminant level of lead in drinking water allowed by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the World Health Organization (WHO) is 15 and 50 µg/L, respectively [7]. When lead concentrations become elevated, serious health problems can occur [6]. Lead poisoning can cause kidney damage, anemia, and toxicity symptoms including impaired kidney function, hypertension, and headache [8].
Various technologies are employed for the removal of heavy metals from water including chemical precipitation [9], ion exchange [10,11], reverse osmosis [12], membrane filtration, and adsorption [11,12]. Adsorption is the most efficient and extensively-used removal method. Commonly-used adsorbents are comprised of activated carbon [1,13], zeolite [14], biomasses [15,16], polymers [17,18], and polymer composites [19,20]. However, activated carbon is one of the most effective adsorbents due to its simplicity, high capacity, and ability to remove low concentrations of lead [21,22,23]. There are two basic activation processes, physical and chemical. Physical activation requires higher temperatures compared to chemical activation processes. Chemical activation can be accomplished in one step through the thermal decomposition of raw materials in the presence of chemical reagents like acid, base, or salt.
Although several adsorbents have been utilized for the removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater, no single adsorbent was found to be effective for different types of water pollutants [7]. Therefore, obtaining material with sufficient and desirable adsorption properties is still a challenge for scientists and engineers. Hence, polymer-based adsorbents, including conducting adsorbents such as polyaniline and polypyrrole, in addition to their composites, have received much attention owing to their potential application in the removal of heavy metals from aqueous solutions. They offer advantages such as a high surface area, a porous structure, favorable electrochemical properties, ion exchange capability, facile synthesis, simple operation and regeneration, high stability, and cost effectiveness, which favor their utilization as efficient adsorbents for the removal of water pollutants [24,25,26,27,28].
Polypyrrole powder [29] and polypyrrole-based composites composed of different materials, such as carbon nanotubes [30,31], chitosan [19], and bentonite [20], have recently been employed for the removal of heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions. In addition, the decolorizing efficiency of polypyrrole-coated sawdust has been investigated, with remarkable results [32].
Nitrogen-doped graphene oxide sheets (N-GO), which are investigated in this work, are reported to have a promising surface texture such as high surface area (2871 m2/g) and pore size and distribution, in addition to their excellent gas adsorption and sensing properties [33,34]. The N-GO sheets were prepared using N-containing precursors (e.g., polypyrrole) in the presence of KOH as a chemical activator and were then characterized and tested for CO2 capture ability. Examining the applicability of such interesting materials for the removal of water pollutants, such as heavy metals and dyes, along with other applications is needed to understand and report fully the potential of these adsorbents.
The objective of this study is to investigate the adsorption performance of the as-prepared polypyrrole-based activated carbon (PPyAC4) using the lead ion as a model adsorbate. The effects of various parameters, including adsorbate initial concentration, pH value, and adsorbent dose, on adsorption efficiency were examined.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Pyrrole monomer C4H5N (Py, +98%), ammonium persulfate (NH4)2S2O8 (APS, 98%), lead nitrate Pb(NO3)2 (99%), potassium hydroxide pellets KOH (85%), and sodium hydroxide pellets NaOH (98%) were purchased from Alfa Aesar, Karlsruhe, Germany. Hydrochloric acid HCl (~36%) and methanol (99.5%) were obtained from Fisher Chemical, Loughborough, U.K. All reagents were used as received without any further treatment. Deionized water was used throughout the experimental process.

2.2. Preparation of PPyAC4

The polypyrrole-based activated carbon PPyAC4 was prepared as previously reported by Alghamdi et al. [33]. Briefly, 0.04 mol of pyrrole were added to 600 mL of 0.1 M HCl and stirred for 30 min at 0–5 °C. APS (0.06 mol) was dissolved in 30 mL of deionized water, stirred for 30 min at 0–5 °C, and added dropwise to the monomer solution while stirring at 0–5 °C. The obtained solid product was filtered, washed with distilled water and methanol, and dried under reduced pressure for 48 h. The carbonization of the polypyrrole (PPy) in the presence of KOH as an activating agent was performed in a Carbolite furnace under a nitrogen atmosphere. PPy was thoroughly mixed with KOH in a 1:4 weight ratio, respectively. The mixture was heated at a ramp rate of 3 °C/min and carbonized for 2 h at 650 °C. After cooling, the product was washed several times by 0.5 M HCl, then by water to neutrality. Finally, it was dried in an oven at 100 °C overnight and then in a vacuum oven at 60 °C until a constant weight was achieved.

2.3. Adsorption Experiments

All adsorption experiments were carried out at room temperature (23 ± 2 °C) using 25 mL of a lead ion solution and constant agitation of 130 rpm using a digital orbital shaker (GLF 3017, GmbH, Burgwedel, Germany). For the kinetic adsorption study, 125 mg of PPyAC4 were added to the adsorbate solutions with initial concentrations of 10, 50, and 100 ppm at pH 5.5, and the residual metal ion concentration was determined at the given time intervals (0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 240, and 360 min), using a flame atomic absorption spectrophotometer (FAAS) (PinAAcle 900T, PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) with a deuterium lamp (BGC-D2) and air-acetylene flame, with a detection limit for lead ion in aqueous solutions of 0.01 mg/L. For each measurement, at least three replicates were performed and averaged. Although adsorption seemed to reach equilibrium at approximately 4 h after initial contact time, the solutions were allowed to agitate for a total period of 24 h, after which the residual Pb2+ concentration was measured to ensure equilibrium. The effects of pH (4.0, 5.5, and 7.0), adsorbate initial concentration (10, 50, and 100 ppm), and adsorbent dose (63, 94, and 125 mg) on the adsorption behavior were studied. For the equilibrium isotherm investigation, 125 mg of adsorbent was mixed with 25 mL of 10, 50, 100, or 250-ppm Pb2+ solutions at pH 5.5 with stirring for 6 h. The initial pH of the experimental solutions was adjusted to the desired pH by dropwise addition of 0.1 M HCl or 0.1 M NaOH to the ion solution with stirring and monitoring by a Benchtop pH meter (Orion 3 Star, Thermo Scientific, Beverly, MA, USA), which was calibrated using pH 4.0 and 7.0 buffer solutions prior to measurement.

2.4. Theoretical Calculations

A stock solution of Pb2+ at a concentration of 500 ppm was prepared by dissolving the appropriate amount of Pb(NO3)2 in deionized water. All working solutions of the desired concentrations were obtained by further dilution with deionized water. A standard curve was established using 5-, 10-, 15-, and 20-ppm solutions (R2 = 0.9990). Sample concentrations were calculated according to the Beer–Lambert law with reference to the standard curve.
The equilibrium adsorption capacity and the percent removal of Pb2+ ions (Re%) were calculated using Equations (1) and (2),
q t = ( C 0 − C e ) V m
R e % = ( C 0 − C e C 0 ) × 100
where qt (mg/g) is the adsorption capacity of PPyAC4 for Pb2+ at time t (min) and C0 and Ce (mg/L) are the liquid phase concentrations of Pb2+ before and after adsorption, respectively. V (L) and m (g) are the volume of the adsorption solution and the mass of the dry adsorbent used, respectively.

2.4.1. Adsorption Kinetics

The data obtained from the kinetic tests were fitted to the pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order models as stated by Lagergren-Svenska [35] and Ho-McKay [36], respectively. Pseudo-first-order Equation (3) assumes that the adsorption rate is based on the adsorption capacity. The pseudo-second-order model, Equation (4), is based on the assumption that the adsorption is controlled by the chemisorption mechanism, involving valency forces through electron sharing or transfer between the adsorbent and adsorbate [36,37].
log ( q e − q t ) = l o g ( q e ) − k 1 t 2.303
t q t = 1 k 2 q e 2 + t q e
where qt and qe (mg/g) are the amount of Pb2+ adsorbed per mass of adsorbent (g) at time t (min) and at equilibrium, respectively, and k1 (1/min) and k2 (mg/(g∙min)) are the rate constants of the pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order models, respectively.
The initial adsorption rate (h) can be calculated from the second-order rate constant as in Equation (5) [38].
h = k 2 q e 2

2.4.2. Adsorption Isotherms

The adsorption isotherm experiments were accomplished by shaking 25 mL of Pb2+ solutions of different concentrations (10–250 ppm) with 125 mg of PPyAC4 for 6 h, at pH 5.5. Two well-known models, Langmuir and Freundlich, were used to describe the isothermal characteristics of the adsorbent [39]. The linear forms of these models can be expressed as in Equations (6) and (7). However, the Langmuir isotherm [40] considers adsorption as a chemical phenomenon, assuming that adsorption occurs uniformly on the active sites of the surface and only a monolayer is formed. Freundlich, on the other hand, assumes a heterogeneous surface and an exponential distribution of active sites and their energies [2,41,42,43,44].
Langmuir linear model:
C e q e = C e q m + 1 K L q m
Freundlich linear model:
l o g q e = l o g K F + 1 n l o g C e
where Ce and qe have the same meaning as previously noted, qm (mg/g) is the maximum monolayer adsorption capacity of the adsorbent, KL (L/mg) is the Langmuir constant describing adsorption affinity for the adsorbent, KF (mg/g) (L/mg)1/n is the Freundlich constant related to the multilayer adsorption capacity, and n is the heterogeneity factor, which represents the extent to which the adsorption depends on the equilibrium concentration. The essential feature of the Langmuir equation can be expressed in terms of a separation factor, RL (dimensionless), which is defined by the following equation.
R L = 1 1 + K L C e

2.5. Characterization

The surface morphologies of PPy and PPyAC4 were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JSM-6360 LV, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM-1011, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed on a Mettler Toledo TGA/DSC 1 Star system (Columbus, OH, USA). The sample was heated from 25–800 °C at 25 °C/min under a nitrogen flow of 20 mL/min. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were obtained using a Rigaku XtaLAB mini II benchtop X-Ray crystallography system (The Woodlands, TX, USA), with copper Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å) and a scan speed of 3°/min.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. PPyAC4 Properties

3.1.1. Morphological Analysis

The surface morphology, thermal properties, and crystallinity of the carbonized PPy were analyzed using SEM, TEM, TGA, and XRD. The surface area and porosity, in addition to some other properties, were reported elsewhere (Table 1) [33]. The SEM and TEM images of the PPy used as the carbon precursor (Figure 1a,c) revealed its typical morphology as a cauliflower-like structure with an average diameter of 0.45 µm (reported as 0.59 µm [45] and ~1 µm [34]). This morphology appears to be due to the difficulty with which the dopant intercalates the disordered polymeric chain [46,47], as reported in the case of polythiophene films for which the role of dopant in the polymeric growth, uniformity, and extent of doping were investigated [48]. It has been concluded that the surface homogeneity and defects are related to the increase in the polymer thickness, the type of polymer, and the nature of the dopant. However, the spherical structure of PPy was destroyed through the carbonization process, resulting in a rough, rugged surface consisting of irregular, sharp corners and peel-like particles [34] with little evidence of porosity in the SEM images. The TEM image of PPyAC4 given in Figure 1d indicates the formation of graphene nanosheets; homogeneously-distributed micropores were seen with an average diameter of 12.5 nm, which is slightly higher than that indicated by BET data (2.3 nm). Furthermore, the TEM image depicts highly-abundant and symmetrical pores, with a shape previously determined to be long cylindrical capillaries [33]. The surface area and microporosity values corresponding to this activated carbon, prepared under the same temperature and activator conditions (KOH/PPy = 4) and a similar heating rate and time, have been reported previously [33,34]. The authors reported increased surface area and enhanced porosity characteristics with increased amounts of KOH.

3.1.2. XRD Analysis

Figure 2 shows the X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of PPy and its corresponding activated carbon, PPyAC4. Typically, a broad reflection peak from 2θ = 10–30°, as well as an amorphous structure is observed for PPy. A similar pattern was observed for PPyAC4 in which the peak center was shifted to a lower 2θ value, i.e., from 26.4 to 23.7°, indicating that the interplanar spacing was increased. This could be due to the effect of the activating KOH, which could cause the sheets to be spaced further apart [45]. However, the analysis revealed that the PPyAC4 formed is amorphous in nature with short-disordered graphene sheets indicated by the broad peak at 2θ = 23.7° corresponding to the (002) plane [49]. In addition, the broad peak resulting from PPyAC4 was more symmetrical than the PPy peak, indicating a higher semi-crystalline structure than that of the substrate. A Savitzky–Golay (SG) smoothing method was applied to follow the peak center and the hidden peaks in the diffractogram, as seen in the insert of Figure 2. Thus, the peak shape became clearer, and shoulders could be identified; in addition, a weak peak at 2θ = 52° could be seen.

3.1.3. Thermogravimetric Analysis

The thermal stability of PPy and PPyAC4 was assessed from the TGA and the derivative-TGA (DTG) curves (Figure 3). The DTG curves showed the mid-point decomposition temperature. The initial weight losses at about 83 °C (6%) and 103 °C (7%) for PPy and PPyAC4, respectively, could be attributed to the evaporation of water absorbed on the sample surfaces [50]. Thereafter, a gradual thermal decomposition of the sample backbone was noticed. The residual masses of PPy and PPyAC4 at 800 °C were found to be 44 and 65%, respectively, indicating a higher stability of the carbonaceous material.

3.2. Batch Method Adsorption Studies

All adsorption experiments were carried out at room temperature (i.e., 23 ± 2 °C) with a shaking speed of 130 rpm. The effect of several parameters, such as pH, adsorbate concentration, and adsorbent dose, on adsorption ability were studied.

3.2.1. Effect of Contact Time and Adsorption Kinetics

Figure 4 shows the effect of contact time and Pb2+ concentration on adsorption percentage and capacity. In this figure, it can be seen that the Pb2+ adsorption was rapid in the first stage of adsorption, then slowly increased with time, becoming almost constant after 120 min. This phenomenon can be attributed to the high availability of vacant adsorption sites in the first stage of adsorption, followed by an increase in repulsive forces due to the presence of the adsorbed ions, making the remaining sites more difficult to access [37,41]. It was observed that the ion removal percentage was slightly reduced with an increase in initial concentration (Figure 4 and Figure 5). This behavior could be ascribed to the presence of a higher concentration of adsorbate per unit mass of adsorbent, which may restrict adsorption.
To investigate the mechanism controlling the adsorption processes, the kinetic data collected in this study were fitted to the pseudo-first- and pseudo-second-order models. The linearized-integral equations, Equations (3) and (4), used to examine the two models are represented in Figure 6 and Figure 7. The calculated kinetic parameters are given in Table 2. Herein, the two models showed a good fit with the experimental data. However, the higher correlation coefficient (R2) values obtained from the pseudo-second-order (0.9997, 0.9997, and 0.9996) compared to those of the pseudo-first-order (0.9035, 0.9862, and 0.9507) kinetic model for the initial concentrations of 10, 50, and 100 mg/L, respectively, suggest that the adsorption more closely followed the pseudo-second-order kinetics. It was observed that the pseudo-second-order rate constant (k2) was inversely proportional to the initial concentration of Pb2+, indicating that the surface saturation was dependent on the initial ion concentration. Therefore, at low concentration, the binding sites took up the available ions quickly, but at higher concentration, the adsorption species needed to diffuse to the internal sites by intra-particle diffusion, resulting in reduced adsorption rate [51]. Furthermore, the effect of particle interaction, such as aggregation, may be the reason for the observed adsorption density decreases with the increase in adsorbent dose. In addition, the qe values calculated from the pseudo-second-order model were in agreement with the experimental values. Hence, the rate-limiting step of Pb2+ adsorption seemed to be controlled by a chemical adsorption process through the sharing or exchanging of electrons between adsorbent and adsorbate [22,52]. The initial adsorption rate (h) was also found to increase with increasing initial lead ion concentration.

3.2.2. Effect of pH

The adsorption of heavy metals is significantly affected by the pH of the solution, since it determines adsorbent properties such as surface charge, as well as the adsorbate speciation and degree of ionization in aqueous solutions. Adsorption studies were performed at various pH values; Figure 8 summarizes the adsorption data at pH 4.0, 5.5, and 7.0. The results indicated a higher adsorption percentage and capacity at pH 5.5 compared to those at the other examined pHs, a finding consistent with the literature [2,20,41]. Since the surface of the activated carbon is negative, electrostatic interactions with metal ions are expected. At a lower pH (e.g., 4.0), the adsorption of Pb2+ was low due to competition between protons and Pb2+ ions for the available adsorption sites [2]. As the pH increased from 4.0–5.5, there were fewer protonated active sites leaving more negatively-charged active sites available for electrostatic interaction with and thus adsorption of the positively-charged Pb2+ ions. The slight decrease in adsorption at pH > 5 could be attributed to the formation of soluble hydroxyl complexes, e.g., Pb(OH)+ and/or Pb(OH)2 [53]. Moreover, at pH > 7, lead hydroxide started to precipitate from the solution, making the adsorption studies impossible [54].

3.2.3. Effect of Adsorbent Dosage

Figure 9 shows the effect of adsorbent dosage on the adsorption capacity of PPyAC4 for Pb2+ uptake. It is obvious that by increasing the adsorbent dosage, the adsorption capacity (qe, mg/g) decreased and the adsorption percentage increased as depicted in Figure 9. This might be due to the fact that all active sites were entirely exposed at lower doses, while only a fraction of the active sites were exposed at higher doses [22,55]. Thus, a higher adsorbent dosage may cause aggregation, which decreases the total surface area of adsorbent, leading to a decrease in adsorption [2,41,56].

3.3. Adsorption Isotherms

3.3.1. Langmuir Model

The Langmuir isotherm considers adsorption as a chemical phenomenon. This model assumes that all the available adsorption active sites are similar, the adsorbed species does not interact, and a monolayer is formed during adsorption [40]. The linear form of the Langmuir isotherm was applied for calculation of the corresponding parameters, given in Table 3. The results indicated that the adsorption capacity corresponding to the monolayer adsorption (qm) was 50 mg/g, and KL, the Langmuir constant related to the free energy of adsorption, was 0.02 (L/mg). When the essential parameter, RL, is between zero and one, this indicates favorable adsorption, while RL = 0 and RL ≥ 1 indicate irreversible and unfavorable adsorption isotherms, respectively. Thus, the obtained RL value of 0.450 suggested favorable adsorption of Pb2+ onto PPyAC4.

3.3.2. Freundlich Isotherm

The Freundlich isotherm parameters were calculated and summarized in Table 3. According to the R2 value of both the Langmuir (0.989) and Freundlich (0.995) isotherms, it was concluded that the two models were reasonably suitable for describing adsorption. However, the Freundlich equation provided a better fit than the Langmuir equation. The value of KF indicated moderate affinity for Pb2+. Moreover, the Freundlich model is also characterized by the heterogeneity factor, 1/n. That is, 0.1 < 1/n < 1.0 indicates good adsorption of metal ions onto the adsorbent [53,57]. From the isotherm data (Table 3), it is clear that the Freundlich model well fit the adsorption, suggesting a chemical adsorption process, as indicated by the n value (1.276), the heterogeneity factor.
The adsorption capacity of other adsorbents for Pb2+ ion taken from the literature are given in Table 4 for comparison. The value of maximum adsorption capacity, qm, (mg/g) observed in this work was in good agreement with those found in literature. The differences of lead adsorption capacities are due to the differences in adsorbent properties such as structure, surface area, porosity, and functional groups. Additionally, the selection of the most suitable adsorbent depends on a number of factors such as cost-effectiveness, availability, and reusability. Adsorbents produced from agricultural and industrial wastes are generally less expensive than the synthesized or commercially-available activated carbons. However, the qualities and characteristics of activated carbons depend on both their precursors and activation methods. In Table 4, hazelnut husk, apricot stone, Juniperus procera, coconut shell, and Polygonum orientale Linn are agricultural and naturally-available products, utilized as low-cost materials for the preparation of activated carbon and investigated for the removal of lead ions from wastewater. In addition to their ability of regeneration, their values of qm vary between 13.05 and 98.39 (mg/g). On the other hand, acidified CNTs and PPy/oMWCNT composite (Table 4) are commercial products and are fabricated as adsorbents for lead ion removal. They have moderate adsorption capacities among the compared adsorbents, while their use may be costly. The adsorption capacity of the polypyrrole-based activated carbon (PPyAC4) was comparable. Although the PPyAC4 precursor was relatively inexpensive compared to CNTs, the facile preparation and activation methods can be extended to various polymer precursors, including low-cost, recyclable polymer waste.

4. Conclusions

To understand further the characteristics of the prepared polypyrrole-based activated carbon (PPyAC4), the resulting SEM, TEM, TGA, and XRD data were compared to those of the PPy substrate. PPyAC4 was obtained as an amorphous fine powder exhibiting encouraging surface properties including high surface area and porosity, indicating its potential for use as an adsorbent material for the removal of metal pollutants. The adsorption study demonstrated that PPyAC4 is an effective adsorbent for the removal of lead ions from their aqueous solutions. Adsorption equilibrium was attained within 4 h at the optimum pH of 5.5. The adsorption capacity at equilibrium, qe, was found to be greatly influenced by the concentration and pH of the solution, as well as the adsorbent dosage. The adsorption kinetics obeyed the pseudo-second-order model, suggesting that the rate-limiting step may be chemisorption rather than diffusion. Accordingly, the initial adsorption rate (h) was found to increase with increasing initial Pb2+ concentration, reaching 49.9 (mg/(g·min)) for the 100-ppm/25-mL solution. The adsorption equilibrium of Pb2+ was satisfactorily described by both the Langmuir and Freundlich equations along the studied concentration range, with better correlation to the Freundlich isotherm. The maximum adsorption (qm) calculated from the Langmuir equation was 50 mg/g.

Author Contributions

Data curation, A.-B.A.-O.; formal analysis, A.-B.A.-O.; funding acquisition, A.A.A. and F.A.A.; investigation, W.S.S. and T.A.; methodology, A.-B.A.-O. and W.S.S.; project administration, A.A.-K.; software, W.S.S.; supervision, A.A.-K.; writing, original draft, A.-B.A.-O.; writing, review and editing, A.A.A., A.-B.A.-O., and T.A.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University for funding this work through Research Group No. RGP-1438-040.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Mahmud, H.; Hosseini, S.; Yahya, R. Polymer adsorbent for the removal of lead ions from aqueous solution. Int. J. Tech. Res. Appl. 2014, 11, 04–08. [Google Scholar]
  2. Mohammadi, S.Z.; Karimi, M.A.; Afzali, D.; Mansouri, F. Removal of Pb (II) from aqueous solutions using activated carbon from Sea-buckthorn stones by chemical activation. Desalination 2010, 262, 86–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Amarasinghe, B.; Williams, R. Tea waste as a low cost adsorbent for the removal of Cu and Pb from wastewater. Chem. Eng. J. 2007, 132, 299–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yarkandi, N. Removal of lead (II) from waste water by adsorption. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2014, 3, 207–228. [Google Scholar]
  5. Axtell, N.R.; Sternberg, S.P.; Claussen, K. Lead and nickel removal using Microspora and Lemna minor. Bioresour. Technol. 2003, 89, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mouflih, M.; Aklil, A.; Jahroud, N.; Gourai, M.; Sebti, S. Removal of lead from aqueous solutions by natural phosphate. Hydrometallurgy 2006, 81, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mahmud, H.N.M.E.; Huq, A.O.; binti Yahya, R. The removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater/aqueous solution using polypyrrole-based adsorbents: A review. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 14778–14791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Singh, C.; Sahu, J.; Mahalik, K.; Mohanty, C.; Mohan, B.R.; Meikap, B. Studies on the removal of Pb (II) from wastewater by activated carbon developed from Tamarind wood activated with sulphuric acid. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 153, 221–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Djedidi, Z.; Bouda, M.; Souissi, M.A.; Cheikh, R.B.; Mercier, G.; Tyagi, R.D.; Blais, J.-F. Metals removal from soil, fly ash and sewage sludge leachates by precipitation and dewatering properties of the generated sludge. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 172, 1372–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Islam, M.; Patel, R. Removal of lead (II) from aqueous environment by a fibrous ion exchanger: Polycinnamamide thorium (IV) phosphate. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 172, 707–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kobya, M.; Demirbas, E.; Senturk, E.; Ince, M. Adsorption of heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions by activated carbon prepared from apricot stone. Bioresour. Technol. 2005, 96, 1518–1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. O’Connell, D.W.; Birkinshaw, C.; O’Dwyer, T.F. Heavy metal adsorbents prepared from the modification of cellulose: A review. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 6709–6724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kadirvelu, K.; Thamaraiselvi, K.; Namasivayam, C. Removal of heavy metals from industrial wastewaters by adsorption onto activated carbon prepared from an agricultural solid waste. Bioresour. Technol. 2001, 76, 63–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Blanchard, G.; Maunaye, M.; Martin, G. Removal of heavy metals from waters by means of natural zeolites. Water Res. 1984, 18, 1501–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bailey, S.E.; Olin, T.J.; Bricka, R.M.; Adrian, D.D. A review of potentially low-cost sorbents for heavy metals. Water Res. 1999, 33, 2469–2479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ahluwalia, S.S.; Goyal, D. Microbial and plant derived biomass for removal of heavy metals from wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2007, 98, 2243–2257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Nomanbhay, S.M.; Palanisamy, K. Removal of heavy metal from industrial wastewater using chitosan coated oil palm shell charcoal. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 2005, 8, 43–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, X.; Hu, Q.; Fang, Z.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, B. Magnetic chitosan nanocomposites: A useful recyclable tool for heavy metal ion removal. Langmuir 2008, 25, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, Y.; Xue, Q.; Li, F.; Dai, J. Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater by capacitive deionization using polypyrrole/chitosan composite electrode. Adsorpt. Sci. Technol. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Alawa, B.; Srivstava, J.; Srivastava, A.; Palsania, J. Adsorption of heavy metal Pb (II) from synthetic waste water by polypyrrole composites. Int. J. Chem. Stud. 2015, 3, 04–08. [Google Scholar]
  21. He, Z.-Y.; Nie, H.-L.; Branford-White, C.; Zhu, L.-M.; Zhou, Y.-T.; Zheng, Y. Removal of Cu2+ from aqueous solution by adsorption onto a novel activated nylon-based membrane. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 7954–7958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Li, Y.; Du, Q.; Wang, X.; Zhang, P.; Wang, D.; Wang, Z.; Xia, Y. Removal of lead from aqueous solution by activated carbon prepared from Enteromorpha prolifera by zinc chloride activation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 183, 583–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Deliyanni, E.A.; Kyzas, G.Z.; Triantafyllidis, K.S.; Matis, K.A. Activated carbons for the removal of heavy metal ions: A systematic review of recent literature focused on lead and arsenic ions. Open Chem. 2015, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Weidlich, C.; Mangold, K.-M.; Jüttner, K. Conducting polymers as ion-exchangers for water purification. Electrochim. Acta 2001, 47, 741–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Abdi, M.M.; Kassim, A.; Mahmud, H.E.; Yunus, W.M.M.; Talib, Z.A.; Sadrolhosseini, A.R. Physical, optical, and electrical properties of a new conducting polymer. J. Mater. Sci. 2009, 44, 3682–3686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yao, T.; Wang, C.; Wu, J.; Lin, Q.; Lv, H.; Zhang, K.; Yu, K.; Yang, B. Preparation of raspberry-like polypyrrole composites with applications in catalysis. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2009, 338, 573–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Truong, V.-T.; Lai, P.; Moore, B.; Muscat, R.; Russo, M. Corrosion protection of magnesium by electroactive polypyrrole/paint coatings. Synth. Met. 2000, 110, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mahmud, H.; Hosseini, S.; Yahya, R.B. Removal of Nickel Ions from Aqueous Solution by Polypyrrole Conducting Polymer; Trans Tech Publ: Zurich, Switzerland, 2014; Volume 594, p. 793. [Google Scholar]
  29. Mahmud, H.; Huq, A.; Yahya, R. Polymer-based adsorbent for heavy metals removal from aqueous solution. In Proceedings of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2017; Volume 206, p. 012100. [Google Scholar]
  30. Nyairo, W.N.; Eker, Y.R.; Kowenje, C.; Akin, I.; Bingol, H.; Tor, A.; Ongeri, D.M. Efficient adsorption of lead (II) and copper (II) from aqueous phase using oxidized multiwalled carbon nanotubes/polypyrrole composite. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2018, 53, 1498–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Xing, J.; Zhu, C.; Chowdhury, I.; Tian, Y.; Du, D.; Lin, Y. Electrically switched ion exchange based on polypyrrole and carbon nanotube nanocomposite for the removal of chromium (VI) from aqueous solution. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2018, 57, 768–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ansari, I.; Mosayebzadeh, Z. Removal of basic dye methylene blue from aqueous solutions using sawdust and sawdust coated with polypyrrole. JICS 2010, 7, 339–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Alghamdi, A.; Alshahrani, A.; Khdary, N.; Alharthi, F.; Alattas, H.; Adil, S. Enhanced CO2 Adsorption by Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Oxide Sheets (N-GOs) Prepared by Employing Polymeric Precursors. Materials 2018, 11, 578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Sevilla, M.; Valle-Vigón, P.; Fuertes, A.B. N-doped polypyrrole-based porous carbons for CO2 capture. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2011, 21, 2781–2787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lagegren, S.; Svenska, B. Zur theorie der sogenannten adsorption geloester stoffe. Vaternskapsakad Handl. 1898, 24, 1–39. [Google Scholar]
  36. Ho, Y.-S.; McKay, G. Pseudo-second order model for sorption processes. Process Biochem. 1999, 34, 451–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Guo, J.; Song, Y.; Ji, X.; Ji, L.; Cai, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Song, W. Preparation and Characterization of Nanoporous Activated Carbon Derived from Prawn Shell and Its Application for Removal of Heavy Metal Ions. Materials 2019, 12, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Kalavathy, M.H.; Karthikeyan, T.; Rajgopal, S.; Miranda, L.R. Kinetic and isotherm studies of Cu (II) adsorption onto H3PO4-activated rubber wood sawdust. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2005, 292, 354–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Mohanty, K.; Jha, M.; Meikap, B.; Biswas, M. Removal of chromium (VI) from dilute aqueous solutions by activated carbon developed from Terminalia arjuna nuts activated with zinc chloride. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2005, 60, 3049–3059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Langmuir, I. The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1918, 40, 1361–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Huang, Y.; Li, S.; Chen, J.; Zhang, X.; Chen, Y. Adsorption of Pb (II) on mesoporous activated carbons fabricated from water hyacinth using H3PO4 activation: Adsorption capacity, kinetic and isotherm studies. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 293, 160–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, L.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, R.; Li, Y.; Li, C.; Zhang, C. Adsorption of Pb (II) on activated carbon prepared from Polygonum orientale Linn.: Kinetics, isotherms, pH, and ionic strength studies. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 5808–5814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Freundlich, H. Over the adsorption in solution. J. Phys. Chem 1906, 57, 1100–1107. [Google Scholar]
  44. Salam, O.E.A.; Reiad, N.A.; ElShafei, M.M. A study of the removal characteristics of heavy metals from wastewater by low-cost adsorbents. J. Adv. Res. 2011, 2, 297–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Chitte, H.K.; Bhat, N.V.; Gore, M.A.V.; Shind, G.N. Synthesis of polypyrrole using ammonium peroxy disulfate (APS) as oxidant together with some dopants for use in gas sensors. Mater. Sci. Appl. 2011, 2, 1491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Liu, A.S.; Oliveira, M.A.S. Corrosion control of aluminum surfaces by polypyrrole films: Influence of electrolyte. Mater. Res. 2007, 10, 205–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bazzaoui, M.; Martins, L.; Bazzaoui, E.; Martins, J. New single-step electrosynthesis process of homogeneous and strongly adherent polypyrrole films on iron electrodes in aqueous medium. Electrochim. Acta 2002, 47, 2953–2962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tourillon, G.; Garnier, F. Morphology of conducting organic polymers: Polythiophene and poly (3-methyl thiophene). J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Phys. Ed. 1984, 22, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yu, J.T.; Dehkhoda, A.M.; Ellis, N. Development of biochar-based catalyst for transesterification of canola oil. Energy Fuels 2010, 25, 337–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wu, W.; Yang, L.; Chen, S.; Shao, Y.; Jing, L.; Zhao, G.; Wei, H. Core–shell nanospherical polypyrrole/graphene oxide composites for high performance supercapacitors. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 91645–91653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zafar, M.N.; Nadeem, R.; Hanif, M.A. Biosorption of nickel from protonated rice bran. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 143, 478–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Nuhoglu, Y.; Malkoc, E. Thermodynamic and kinetic studies for environmentaly friendly Ni (II) biosorption using waste pomace of olive oil factory. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 2375–2380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Mouni, L.; Merabet, D.; Bouzaza, A.; Belkhiri, L. Adsorption of Pb (II) from aqueous solutions using activated carbon developed from Apricot stone. Desalination 2011, 276, 148–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Boujelben, N.; Bouzid, J.; Elouear, Z. Removal of lead (II) ions from aqueous solutions using manganese oxide-coated adsorbents: Characterization and kinetic study. Adsorpt. Sci. Technol. 2009, 27, 177–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Gupta, V.; Rastogi, A. Biosorption of lead from aqueous solutions by green algae Spirogyra species: Kinetics and equilibrium studies. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 152, 407–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Depci, T.; Kul, A.R.; Önal, Y. Competitive adsorption of lead and zinc from aqueous solution on activated carbon prepared from Van apple pulp: Study in single-and multi-solute systems. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 200, 224–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Weber, T.W.; Chakravorti, R.K. Pore and solid diffusion models for fixed-bed adsorbers. Aiche J. 1974, 20, 228–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Imamoglu, M.; Tekir, O. Removal of copper (II) and lead (II) ions from aqueous solutions by adsorption on activated carbon from a new precursor hazelnut husks. Desalination 2008, 228, 108–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Li, Y.-H.; Wang, S.; Wei, J.; Zhang, X.; Xu, C.; Luan, Z.; Wu, D.; Wei, B. Lead adsorption on carbon nanotubes. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2002, 357, 263–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ali, I.H.; Al Mesfer, M.K.; Khan, M.I.; Danish, M.; Alghamdi, M.M. Exploring Adsorption Process of Lead (II) and Chromium (VI) Ions from Aqueous Solutions on Acid Activated Carbon Prepared from Juniperus procera Leaves. Processes 2019, 7, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kikuchi, Y.; Qian, Q.; Machida, M.; Tatsumoto, H. Effect of ZnO loading to activated carbon on Pb (II) adsorption from aqueous solution. Carbon 2006, 44, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 12 02020 g001 550
Figure 1. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (top row) and transition electron microscopy (TEM) (bottom row) images of PPy (a,c) and PPyAC4 (b,d). The insert (d) is a 6.5-times magnification of the specified area.
Figure 1. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (top row) and transition electron microscopy (TEM) (bottom row) images of PPy (a,c) and PPyAC4 (b,d). The insert (d) is a 6.5-times magnification of the specified area.
Materials 12 02020 g001
Materials 12 02020 g002 550
Figure 2. The X-ray diffraction patterns of PPy and PPyAC4. The inset is a 50 points (pts) smoothing of the data points according to a Savitzky–Golay (SG) method.
Figure 2. The X-ray diffraction patterns of PPy and PPyAC4. The inset is a 50 points (pts) smoothing of the data points according to a Savitzky–Golay (SG) method.
Materials 12 02020 g002
Materials 12 02020 g003 550
Figure 3. The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) thermograms of PPy (top) and PPyAC4 (bottom) and their corresponding derivative-TGA (DTG) curves.
Figure 3. The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) thermograms of PPy (top) and PPyAC4 (bottom) and their corresponding derivative-TGA (DTG) curves.
Materials 12 02020 g003
Materials 12 02020 g004 550
Figure 4. Adsorption percentage of Pb2+ onto PPyAC4 vs. time at three different concentrations: 10, 50, and 100 ppm. Experimental conditions: adsorbent dose 125 mg/25 mL, agitation speed 130 rpm, pH 5.5, temperature 23 ± 2 °C.
Figure 4. Adsorption percentage of Pb2+ onto PPyAC4 vs. time at three different concentrations: 10, 50, and 100 ppm. Experimental conditions: adsorbent dose 125 mg/25 mL, agitation speed 130 rpm, pH 5.5, temperature 23 ± 2 °C.
Materials 12 02020 g004
Materials 12 02020 g005 550
Figure 5. Adsorption capacity (mg/g) of PPyAC4 vs. time at three Pb2+ concentrations: 10, 50, and 100 ppm. Experimental conditions: adsorbent dose 125 mg/25 mL, agitation speed 130 rpm, pH 5.5, temperature 23 ± 2 °C.
Figure 5. Adsorption capacity (mg/g) of PPyAC4 vs. time at three Pb2+ concentrations: 10, 50, and 100 ppm. Experimental conditions: adsorbent dose 125 mg/25 mL, agitation speed 130 rpm, pH 5.5, temperature 23 ± 2 °C.
Materials 12 02020 g005
Materials 12 02020 g006 550
Figure 6. Pseudo-first-order kinetics of Pb2+ adsorption on PPyAC4 at 10, 50, and 100 ppm. Experimental conditions: adsorbent dose 125 mg/25 mL, agitation speed 130 rpm, pH 5.5, temperature 23 ± 2 °C. (exp = experiment).
Figure 6. Pseudo-first-order kinetics of Pb2+ adsorption on PPyAC4 at 10, 50, and 100 ppm. Experimental conditions: adsorbent dose 125 mg/25 mL, agitation speed 130 rpm, pH 5.5, temperature 23 ± 2 °C. (exp = experiment).
Materials 12 02020 g006
Materials 12 02020 g007 550
Figure 7. Pseudo-second-order kinetic of Pb2+ adsorption on PPyAC4 at 10, 50, and 100 ppm. Experimental conditions: adsorbent dose 125 mg/25 mL, agitation speed 130 rpm, pH 5.5, temperature 23 ± 2 °C. (exp = experiment).
Figure 7. Pseudo-second-order kinetic of Pb2+ adsorption on PPyAC4 at 10, 50, and 100 ppm. Experimental conditions: adsorbent dose 125 mg/25 mL, agitation speed 130 rpm, pH 5.5, temperature 23 ± 2 °C. (exp = experiment).
Materials 12 02020 g007
Materials 12 02020 g008 550
Figure 8. Graphical illustration of the effect of pH on the adsorption capacity and percent removal of lead by PPyAC4. Experimental conditions: adsorbent dose 125 mg/25 mL, agitation speed 130 rpm, temperature 23 ± 2 °C.
Figure 8. Graphical illustration of the effect of pH on the adsorption capacity and percent removal of lead by PPyAC4. Experimental conditions: adsorbent dose 125 mg/25 mL, agitation speed 130 rpm, temperature 23 ± 2 °C.
Materials 12 02020 g008
Materials 12 02020 g009 550
Figure 9. Effect of adsorbent dosage on the adsorption of Pb2+ by PPyAC4. Experimental conditions: adsorbent solution 25 mL, agitation speed 130 rpm, pH 5.5, temperature 23 ± 2 °C.
Figure 9. Effect of adsorbent dosage on the adsorption of Pb2+ by PPyAC4. Experimental conditions: adsorbent solution 25 mL, agitation speed 130 rpm, pH 5.5, temperature 23 ± 2 °C.
Materials 12 02020 g009
Table
Table 1. Polypyrrole-based activated carbon (PPyAC4) properties: Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area, pore volume and diameter, and CO2 uptake capacity at 50 °C and 1.0 atm [33]. The pore diameter calculated from the transmission electron microscope (TEM) image is also included.
Table 1. Polypyrrole-based activated carbon (PPyAC4) properties: Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area, pore volume and diameter, and CO2 uptake capacity at 50 °C and 1.0 atm [33]. The pore diameter calculated from the transmission electron microscope (TEM) image is also included.
SampleSurface Area (m2/g)Average Pore Diameter (nm)Pore Volume (cm3/g)CO2 Uptake Capacity
BETTEMmg/gmmol/g
PPyAC428712.312.50.05449.951.14
Table
Table 2. Kinetic parameters of pseudo-first- and pseudo-second-order equations for Pb2+ adsorption on PPyAC4 at Co = 10, 50, and 100 ppm.
Table 2. Kinetic parameters of pseudo-first- and pseudo-second-order equations for Pb2+ adsorption on PPyAC4 at Co = 10, 50, and 100 ppm.
Co
(mg/L)		qe-exp
(mg/g)		Pseudo-First OrderPseudo-Second-Order
qe
(mg/g)		k1
(1/min)		R2qe
(mg/g)		k2
(g/(mg·min))		R2h
(mg/(g·min))
101.6821.1381.1700.90421.7392.5050.99977.575
508.1044.7101.1190.98638.6210.4080.999730.323
10016.0120.8451.7230.951417.2410.1680.999649.938
Table
Table 3. Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm parameters for Pb2+ adsorption on PPyAC4.
Table 3. Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm parameters for Pb2+ adsorption on PPyAC4.
AdsorbentLangmuirFreundlich
PPyAC4qm (mg/g)KL (L/mg)R2RL1/nnKF (mg/g)(L/mg)1/nR2
500.0200.9890.4500.7841.2761.2420.995
Table
Table 4. Comparison of the adsorption capacity of various adsorbents for Pb2+.
Table 4. Comparison of the adsorption capacity of various adsorbents for Pb2+.
Activated Carbon Sourceqm (mg/g)Adsorption ConditionsRef.
pHT (°C)Co (mg/L)Adsorbent Dosage (g/L)
Hazelnut husk (HH)13.055.71820012.0[58]
Acidified CNTs17.445.0-10-[59]
Apricot stone21.386.020501.0[53]
PPy/oMWCNT composite26.326.02510–1001.0[30]
Juniperus procera30.34.625508.0[60]
Coconut shell76.665.625-2.0[61]
Polygonum orientale Linn98.395.02550–750.6[42]
Polypyrrole-based AC50.05.5231005.0This work

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alghamdi, A.A.; Al-Odayni, A.-B.; Saeed, W.S.; Al-Kahtani, A.; Alharthi, F.A.; Aouak, T. Efficient Adsorption of Lead (II) from Aqueous Phase Solutions Using Polypyrrole-Based Activated Carbon. Materials 2019, 12, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12122020

AMA Style

Alghamdi AA, Al-Odayni A-B, Saeed WS, Al-Kahtani A, Alharthi FA, Aouak T. Efficient Adsorption of Lead (II) from Aqueous Phase Solutions Using Polypyrrole-Based Activated Carbon. Materials. 2019; 12(12):2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12122020

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alghamdi, Abdulaziz Ali, Abdel-Basit Al-Odayni, Waseem Sharaf Saeed, Abdullah Al-Kahtani, Fahad A. Alharthi, and Taieb Aouak. 2019. "Efficient Adsorption of Lead (II) from Aqueous Phase Solutions Using Polypyrrole-Based Activated Carbon" Materials 12, no. 12: 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12122020

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop